02 land 2d surveys modified

33
Land 2D Geometry & Surveys

Upload: petro-man

Post on 12-May-2017

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

Land 2D Geometry & Surveys

Page 2: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

Aim of this Course

The aim of this course is to understand the geophysical &

operation concerns of acquiring 2D seismic surveys

Page 3: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

Objectives of this Course

At the end of this course you will be able to:

• Define the various 2D acquisition geometries

• Understand 2D spread roll-on & roll-off

• Understand 2D fold & coverage

• Understand the effect of skips & offsets on CMPs

• Understand different source geometries

Page 4: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

What is 2D Seismic Acquisition?

• 2 Dimensions – Distance along line & time

• Build up a cross-section of data along line

• Single receiver line – may be straight or crooked

• Sources between receiver stations & offset from line

• Multiple intersecting lines in a prospect

Page 5: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Prospect Geometry

Page 6: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

Why 2D?

• Exploration Surveys

• Fast Results

• Large scale, regional picture, low resolution

– Noisy due to poor attenuation of cross-line noise

– Distorted view – only looking in plane of 2D line

• Identify areas of interest & target in 3D

Page 7: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Line Geometry

• Which direction do you choose for your 2D line?

DIP

2D Line Direction

Page 8: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Geometry – Off-End

• Source at one end of live receiver spread

• Occurs at start or end of spread

• Is half the live spread operationally (channel count) &

geophysically (CMPs)

• Only geometry for marine acquisition

Coverage

Page 9: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Geometry – Asymmetric Split-Spread

• Unequal numbers of live receivers on each side of shot

• Occurs during roll-on & roll-off

Coverage

Page 10: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Geometry – Symmetrical Split-Spread

• Occurs within parts of the line where its number of live channels is less

than the total line length

• Also known as full spread, the channel count is greater than off-end but

greater than/equal to asymmetric split spread

• Occurs when equal number of channels and CMP’s exists on either side

of the shot point

Coverage

Page 11: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Geometry – Spread Roll

• In Marine we pull the receivers behind the vessel – End-on shooting

– The “live spread” = active length of streamer

• In Land we have the advantage of being able to lay the receivers along

our entire line

– Only limitation is amount of equipment available

• However we only shoot into some of these receivers for any one shot –

the live spread i.e. the channels on which we will record for that shot

• The live spread rolls-along the length of our line from start to end

• At the start of the line we shoot end-on, then roll-on asymmetrically until

we have achieved full symmetrical split-spread & do full-spread roll until

we roll-off the end of the line

Page 12: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Geometry – Spread Roll

Start of

Line

End of

Line

Far Trace Offset

Live Spread e.g. 200 Channels @ 50m int. 50m

Live Spread Template (as described in client parameter letter)

1st Shot: End-on

Roll-On

Asymmetrical Symmetrical Asymmetrical Last Shot: End-on

Roll-Off Full Spread

Page 13: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Technique – Coverage Build-up

1 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 CMP Fold

CMPs

Stacking Diagram

1st Full Fold CMP

Page 14: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Technique - Coverage Build-up

Area of FULL FOLD

As required by Client

0

Full Fold Full Fold

2D Line

Start of

Line End of

Line

Fo

ld F

old

Live Spread

¼ Live

Spread

¼ Live

Spread

Page 15: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Coverage – Coverage Build-up

• Client only cares about full-fold extent

• To achieve clients full-fold we need to extend the line in each direction –

extra source & receiver points

• Client won’t pay for more shots than necessary – therefore fold must

build-up as quickly as possible

• For SP=RP, first shot starts ¼ live spread from full-fold edge

• Why End-on spread for 1st & last shot? – no point shooting split-spread

where CMP’s don’t contribute to full-fold

Area of FULL FOLD

As required by Client

Page 16: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Fold

• 2D Fold is given by the length of the coverage area divided by

the moveup

2D Fold = RPint

SPint x

N

2

Where: RPint = Receiver station interval (m)

SPint = Source station interval (m)

N = Number of live receivers per shot

• Example: RPint = SPint = 50m, N = 200, Fold = 100

Page 17: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Fold

Relationships between moveup & fold where:

• RP = SP

– then F = Chn/2 i.e.. 2 CMPs between shots

• RP = 2*SP

– then F = Chn i.e.. 1 CMP between shots

• RP = SP/2

– then F = Chn /4 i.e.. 4 CMPs between shots

Page 18: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

Offset – Far Trace Offset

Far Trace Offset (FTO)

• Approximately target depth

• Shows data from the last group of receivers for each source point

• Has to be sufficient for NMO discrimination of primaries & multiples

• Can be extended (e.g. 120% target depth) to identify multiples

• If extended too far, reflections no longer hyperbolic, NMO stretch too

great FTO = Target Depth

Target Depth

Z

Page 19: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

Offsets – Near Trace Offset

Near Trace Offset (NTO)

• Shows shallowest reflector of interest

• Normally < 1 station interval maximum, typically 0.5 station interval

• Shows data from the first group of receivers from each source point

• Important for static corrections

• Important for NMO velocities (small offset = zero moveout)

Page 20: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

Offsets – Source & Receiver Skips

• Source and/or receiver skips result in loss of near-offset & shallow

information

Near Offset/Shallow Data Loss

First Breaks

• Far-offsets provide coverage at depth, however fold is reduced

• This can pose problems if near-surface information required – e.g. for

statics

• For skips greater than ½ spread length we loose continuity completely

Page 21: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

Is this anomaly real?

or

is it a static problem?

X

T

Anomaly or Statics?

• Even after compensations and In-fills you cannot recover the

information

• Need both sources & receivers in the area for near-offset information

Page 22: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Source Offsets

Offset CMPs

Offset CMPs

SP Lateral Offset

SP

SP Lateral Offset

SP SP RP RP RP RP RP RP RP CMPs S/L & R/L

• The shifted CMPs are grouped (binned) with the CMPs on the main

line resulting in SMEARING of the subsurface reflections

Page 23: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Receiver Offsets

CMPs Offset

CMPs Offset

RP Lateral Offset

RP Lateral Offset

S/L & R/L SP SP SP RP RP RP RP RP

CMP’s

• Offset receiver stations – the effect is identical to a source offset

• Typically offsets < 200m allowed

Page 24: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Offsets

• 200m surface offsets give 100m CMP offsets

• No significant increase in smear

• However, crossline noise becomes significant

• Need some crossline protection in arrays

Inline

CrossLine

Page 25: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

Multiple Coverage - Binning

• In the perfect world all our reflection points would come from the same

place – the CMP

• In reality sources & receivers may be shifted from theoretical positions

due to obstacles, positioning errors etc.

• Reflection points no longer coincide

• A scheme must be devised to group traces as if they came from the

same location so they can be stacked - BINNING

Page 26: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Acquisition – Crooked Lines

• Lines are rarely straight, they deviate around obstacles

• Have to bin CMPs along a line of best fit & process

CMPs

Binning ( Start of 3D?)

Page 27: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Acquisition – Crooked Lines

• The greater q, the greater the smear

• Therefore limit q (client/contract dependant)

q

CMP smear

CMP smear CMP smear Obstacle

Page 28: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Acquisition – Crooked Lines

• Reduced smearing by separating sources & receivers

• Vibrators can go around the dune, geophones can be laid

across the top

q

Dune - Obstacle

CMP’s

RP

SP

R/L & S/L

Page 29: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Acquisition – Crooked Lines

Page 30: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Acquisition

Page 31: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Vibrator Moveup

Inline Array – Moveup within the VP

• 4 sweeps/VP, 6.25m moveup/sweep, 6.25m moveup between VPs

25.00m

25.00m

SWEEP 1

SWEEP 2

SWEEP 3

SWEEP 4

6.25m 14.50m

Not to Scale

Page 32: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Vibrator Moveup

Parallelogram Array – Standing Sweeps

• Standing Sweeps x 4 & 25m moveup between VPs

15.00m

10.75m

6.50m 10.75m

21.50m

25.00m

25.00m

25.00m

Not to Scale

Page 33: 02 LAND 2D Surveys Modified

2D Vibrator Moveup

Parallelogram Array – Move up within the VP

• 4 sweeps/VP, 3.38m moveup/sweep, 14.88m moveup between VPs

25.00m

25.00m

25.31m

3.38m

14.88m

Not to Scale