1

0 1 2 3 4 5 km

2

Preliminary volumes

• Zirkon Gamma

Gross rock volume: 4,6 – 7,2 Mm3

HCPV: 1,0 – 1,7 Mm3

If oil; STOOIP: 0,8 – 1,3 SMm3 Chance of making a discovery: 44% If discovery: chance of oil: 70%

chance of gas: 30%

• Zirkon Beta Gross rock volume: 3,5 – 6,5 Mm3 HCPV: 0,7 – 1,6 Mm3 If oil; STOOIP: 0,5 – 1,3 SMm3 Chance of making a discovery: 50% If discovery: chance of oil: 50%

chance of gas: 50%

• Zirkon Alfa

Gross rock volume: 7,0 – 11,0 Mm3 HCPV: 1,4 – 2,8 Mm3 If oil; STOOIP: 1,1 – 2,2 SMm3 Chance of making a discovery: 69% If discovery: chance of oil: 40%

chance of gas: 60%

Jaspis

Zirkon

Alfa

Zirkon

Beta

Zirkon

Gamma

0 1 2 3 km

3

Top Brent; old interpretation Top Brent; new interpretation

Zirkon

Alfa

Zirkon

Beta

Zirkon

Gamma

4

Topp NessBunn kritt

Topp NER

ST8511R92

ST9607FAR

Topp Tarbert

Zirkon Beta

5

Topp Tarbert

Topp NessBunn kritt

Topp NER

ST8511R92

ST9607FARZirkon Beta

6

1980 1980

1940

19401940

1940

1980 1980

1900 1900

1900 1900

Zirkon Gamma

L 2795

L 2753

L 2795 (Far offset -96, WG) – Zirkon Gamma (north)

L 2753 (Far offset -96, WG) – Zirkon Gamma (south)

7

ST 9607 far offset amplitudes

draped on top of Tarbert structure

Gullfaks

Zirkon Gamma

Zirkon Alfa

Zirkon Beta

B-35 gas

South

North

•Prospect evaluation focusing specifically on the;

•trapping geometry

•Evaluate of the process of the slump geometry.

•Discuss the fluid fill/migration route

•Establish a drilling and drainage strategy.