1
0 1 2 3 4 5 km
2
Preliminary volumes
• Zirkon Gamma
Gross rock volume: 4,6 – 7,2 Mm3
HCPV: 1,0 – 1,7 Mm3
If oil; STOOIP: 0,8 – 1,3 SMm3 Chance of making a discovery: 44% If discovery: chance of oil: 70%
chance of gas: 30%
• Zirkon Beta Gross rock volume: 3,5 – 6,5 Mm3 HCPV: 0,7 – 1,6 Mm3 If oil; STOOIP: 0,5 – 1,3 SMm3 Chance of making a discovery: 50% If discovery: chance of oil: 50%
chance of gas: 50%
• Zirkon Alfa
Gross rock volume: 7,0 – 11,0 Mm3 HCPV: 1,4 – 2,8 Mm3 If oil; STOOIP: 1,1 – 2,2 SMm3 Chance of making a discovery: 69% If discovery: chance of oil: 40%
chance of gas: 60%
Jaspis
Zirkon
Alfa
Zirkon
Beta
Zirkon
Gamma
0 1 2 3 km
3
Top Brent; old interpretation Top Brent; new interpretation
Zirkon
Alfa
Zirkon
Beta
Zirkon
Gamma
4
Topp NessBunn kritt
Topp NER
ST8511R92
ST9607FAR
Topp Tarbert
Zirkon Beta
5
Topp Tarbert
Topp NessBunn kritt
Topp NER
ST8511R92
ST9607FARZirkon Beta
6
1980 1980
1940
19401940
1940
1980 1980
1900 1900
1900 1900
Zirkon Gamma
L 2795
L 2753
L 2795 (Far offset -96, WG) – Zirkon Gamma (north)
L 2753 (Far offset -96, WG) – Zirkon Gamma (south)
7
ST 9607 far offset amplitudes
draped on top of Tarbert structure
Gullfaks
Zirkon Gamma
Zirkon Alfa
Zirkon Beta
B-35 gas
South
North
•Prospect evaluation focusing specifically on the;
•trapping geometry
•Evaluate of the process of the slump geometry.
•Discuss the fluid fill/migration route
•Establish a drilling and drainage strategy.