1

2nd Australian based CGSIC Meeting

Ground based Regional Augmentation System (GRAS)

Keith McPherson, Manager GNSS

2

GRAS Definition

A system providing GNSS augmentation service by which the user receives information directly from ground-based transmitters, allowing continuous reception of the service over a large geographical area (200Nm+). The ground components may be interconnected in a network

A system providing GNSS augmentation service by which the user receives information directly from ground-based transmitters, allowing continuous reception of the service over a large geographical area (200Nm+). The ground components may be interconnected in a network

3

Rationale behind GRAS• Availability of (D)GNSS is paramount for Air Traffic Management(ATM) development

• Impact on both Navigation, Surveillance and Communications

• Availability must be from gate-to-gate

• Minimum of new systems for CNS – cost efficiency

• Value added service to CNS/ATM – improved business cases

• Available for all user groups at reasonable costs

• High latitudes

• National and/or Regional sovereign control of the service delivery is vital

4

Aircraft GNSS integrity feed…

GNSS Receiver

GPS/GLONASS/GALILEO

Navigation datalink Communications datalink

GRAS ADS-B Service

5

Alternative Augmentation - GRAS

Key BenefitsKey Benefits

Enroute navigation over entire continent

Non-Precision ApproachesApproaches with vertical guidance (APV-II)

No single point of failure for whole system

Relatively inexpensive compared to US and European augmentation systems

Expected potential to further reduce current navigation aids

6

GRAS usage• En-route

• APV I/II CAT I

• Surface movement guidance

• ADS-B Surveillance

7

GRAS Concept

GPS Constellation

GRS GMSSatcom orTerrestrial

Links

Satcom orTerrestrial

LinksGVS

L

LL

VHF

Users

GRAS Master Station• processes GRS data• determines GPS

corrections & integrity status

• generates SBAS messages

GRAS Ref. Stn

• collects GPS meas. & data

• formats/sends data to GMS

GRAS VHF Stn•Receives & verifies SBAS messages

•converts to GBAS..format

•broadcasts GRASmessages at VHF

User Equip.•receives GPS

& GRAS data•computes SARPs-based nav solution

GPS Constellation

GRS GMSSatcom orTerrestrial

Links

Satcom orTerrestrial

Links

Satcom orTerrestrial

Links

Satcom orTerrestrial

LinksGVS

L

LL

VHF

Users

GRAS Master Station• processes GRS data• determines GPS

corrections & integrity status

• generates SBAS messages

GRAS Ref. Stn

• collects GPS meas. & data

• formats/sends data to GMS

GRAS VHF Stn•Receives & verifies SBAS messages

•converts to GBAS..format

•broadcasts GRASmessages at VHF

User Equip.•receives GPS

& GRAS data•computes SARPs-based nav solution

8

Technical concept

GRAS Data Link

Automatic GroundStation selection

GBASFormat

VHF Data Links

Terrestrial Data Link

LargeAirport

SmallAirport

9

• Ground Reference Stations– Broome– Carnavon– Perth– Darwin– Alice Springs

GRAS Schematic

• Master Control Stations– Brisbane & Melbourne

Data Lines

(Operational Concept)Not to Scale

VHF Transmitters– Using current VHF voice

transmission sites– Connected by data-line to Master

Control Station

– Ceduna– Thursday I– Mackay– Canberra– Hobart

10

VHF Sites Across Australia

11

GRAS Architecture

Ground network

GRAS Broadcast

Interface to other systems, e.g. other GRAS stations or SBAS/EGNOS(external GRAS)

Remote service monitoring etc.

12

GRAS LATERAL ERROR POINT COOK APPROACH RWY 35

RUN 35

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

10

9.6

9

9.3

7

9.0

3

8.6

8

8.3

4 8

7.6

5

7.3

6.9

5

6.5

9

6.2

4

5.8

9

5.5

4

5.1

8

4.8

2

4.4

6

4.0

9

3.7

2

3.3

6 3

2.6

5

2.3

1.9

4

1.6

1.2

6

0.9

3

0.6

0.2

8

NM TO THRESHOLD

ME

TR

ES

LATERAL ERROR

CAT 1 NSE LIMIT

13

GRAS VERTICAL ERROR POINT COOK APPROACH RWY 35

RUN 35

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

10

9.6

9

9.3

7

9.0

3

8.6

8

8.3

4 8

7.6

5

7.3

6.9

5

6.5

9

6.2

4

5.8

9

5.5

4

5.1

8

4.8

2

4.4

6

4.0

9

3.7

2

3.3

6 3

2.6

5

2.3

1.9

4

1.6

1.2

6

0.9

3

0.6

0.2

8

NM TO THRESHOLD

ME

TR

ES

VERTICAL ERROR

CAT 1 NSE LIMIT

14

VHF Cross-over Tests

Melbourne

Cooma

Sydney

HobartTasmania

New South Wales

Albury

15

VHF Cross-over Interference (None so far)

Slots A & H Equal Power Level Slots A & B Equal Power Level

Slots A & B Closer to Cooma

16

20 August 2001

-110

-100

-90

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10014074 10015074 10016074 10017074 10018074 10019074 10020074 10021074 10022074 10023074 10024074 10025074

dB

m Melbourne

Cooma

17

GRAS

Navigation Surveillance

En-route through APV to Surface navigation

GNSS AUGMENTATION

ATC, aircraft and surface vehicles

18

GRAS in perspectiveSBAS

+ Wide Coverage- ComplexityInstitutional

GBAS+ Local(23Nm)

- Dedicated landingSystem

Expensive

ABAS+ Autonomous- High End A/C

GRAS+ Regional service

Step wise implementationAdded value service

- Line of sight

19

GRAS today

• Sent to ICAO for standardisation (GNSSP) uses GBAS message format with minor changes

• Solid manufacturing support

• RTCA and EUROCAE MOPS and MASPS to be completed

• Service identical to GBAS standard.

• GRAS supports PVT and is compatible to GNSSP PVT

• Need for broader understanding and inclusion in regional programs as an alternative, regional solution

20

ICAO Approval Status GRAS

• Concept presented to ICAO – Air Navigation Commission tasked GNSS Panel to

develop SARPs 1999– Australia (Airservices) selected to lead SARPs

development

• Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs)– November 2000 - Concept of Operations developed– March 2001 - first draft of SARPs distributed– November 2001 - text mostly accepted by ICAO– October 2002 - final text agreed– 2002-2003 - validation process– April 2003 - approval sought from GNSS Panel

21

ANY QUESTIONS ??

Old Navigator

New Navigator