1 brookhaven science associates nsls-ii asac-2007, april. 23, 2007 nslsii footprint f. willeke,...
TRANSCRIPT
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
NSLSII Footprint
F. Willeke, April 23, 07
• Accomodation of Extra Long Straights
• Considerations for Accommodating a possible ERL Upgrade into NSLSII
2 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
Outline
Extra Long Straights• reducing symmetry• quasi symmetry preserving solutions• footprint preserving solutions
Accommodating a possible ERL Upgrade into the NSLSII site• Requirements and constraints for an ERL• Performance of an ERL using the NSLSII Ring to distribute the Beams• A possible Parameter Set• Beam Loss and Shielding• Considerations which determine S.C. Linac Overall Length• A possible Footprint of a NSLSII-ERL Facility• Items to be included in present planning to ease later upgrade of an ERL
3 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
CD-1 Footprint
15-fold Lattice symmetry
27 Beam lines from Insertion devices
30 Beam lines from bends
3 Utility straight sections
15 of which see hard x-rays from 3-pole wiggler
Symmetry will be weakly broken to 3-or-5 fold
Because of large aperture dipoles in 3/5 locations
4 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
Integrations of Extra-Long Straights
Several Possibilities to implement:
Reducing the lattice super-periodicity from 15 to 3 or 5 by introducing different achromats with extra long straights
Inserting just two long straights optically matched to the achromat with a transparent lattice x,y = n x 2 Bengtsson
Impact on footprint
Extra-Long Straight Motivation: Nano-focussed beam and experiments with inelastically scattered soft X-rays would profit from extra long straight sections with an active undulator lengths of 10m-12m
3-foldor 5-fold symmetry
Quasi 15-fold symmetry
5 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
A solution based on Transparent Insertion
x=-1.039, y=-3.01 Total length: 23.73 m, free length 3 x 5.83 m x/y: 1.8/1.4 , 3.0/1.3, 1.8/1.4
23m Insert
On-Energy Transparent Opticsx, y = n x 2
Courtesy Guo Wei Ming
Requires verification for realistic conditions, (6D-beam, imperfections, ….)
Needs time
6 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
A Possible Strategy of Providing extra long Straights
Problem:
Lattice Design effort has been centered in optimizing the achromatic super-period.
Still to do: Integration of the entire ring with damping wigglers and insertion devices
and verification of the stability and dynamic aperture
Deadline for freezing the foot print: End of May (driven by start of CF Title I design )
There is not sufficient time to work out a well thought through concept of X-long straights, integrate it and assure stability of the entire ring.
Desirable to base long straights on solutions which are compatible with the food print of a 15-fold symmetric lattice
Can finalize the symmetric lattice in a timely fashion to start building design and engineering design
Can continue to work on way to implement extra long straights and on assurance of single particle stability without time pressure of CD2
7 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
Two examples of implementation of extra-long straightsin 15-fold symmetric footprint
Shorten Straights
Shorten Arcs
T = T015 T = T0
13 T1 ≈ T014
T1 = T120+T1
21+T130+T1
22+ T140 +T1
h.o ≈ T0
= T020 =T0
21=0 =T022=0 =T0
40 ≠T0h.o=T0
30=0
Require(breaks symmetry)
Decomposition of lattice map in linear, nonlinear and chromatic parts
8 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
Making a longer Long-Straights by Shortening two Short-Straights
Lengthening long straight = 2 x shortening the short shtraight
Maximum long : 18m
9 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
Geometry and Optics
90
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
Geometry of the Lattice
Possible Beam Optics
10 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
ERL Integration Considerations
(Nota bene: this is no attempt to lay out an ERL)
11 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
Requirements and Constraints
Ī• Beam Losses critical, present Shielding insufficient• Should go for significantly larger brightness• should plan for higher energy than storage ring• Should allow for sufficient Linac length• Planning for ERL should minimize the additional effort for NSLSII• Bending for returns and injection into the ring should be minimized• Preserve an FEL option• No planning which modifies the site appearance in an unfavorable way• Necessary additional tunnels necessary should stay clear from existing buildings• ERL should be planned such, that construction and commissioning can be parallel to NSLSII running• Stay clear from road North of the site• Stay clear from road West of the site
12 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
Beam Losses ERL
Beam Energy 4 GeV
Beam Current 0.2 A
Loss level 1E-6
Power Loss 400 W
Particle Loss rate 1.25E12 Hz
Storage Ring
Beam Energy 3.6 GeV
Beam Current 0.6 A
lifetime 2 h
Particle Loss rate 1.35E9 Hz
Ratio off losses 831
Necessary increase in Shielding 1.56 m
13 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
Short Parameter List
Energy 4 GeV
Beam Current 200 mA
Normalized Emittance 0.5 m
Energy Spread 10 -4
Bunch Length 0.5 mm
Linac gradient 10 MV/mLinac Length 723 m
14 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
Comparison of Brightness
• NSLS NSLS-II ERL• Energy, GeV 2.8 3 4• Current, mA 275 500 200• Emittance X, nm 53 0.5 0.1• Emittance Y, nm 0.117 0.005 0.1• Energy spread, % 0.084 0.1 0.01• BetaX, m 1.114 3.3 7 • BetaY, m 0.407 1 7• Dispersion X, m 0.15 0 0• • Undulator • • Period, cm 1.25 1.4 14• Length, m 0.3375 2 18• K 1.1 2 2
15 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
Brightness
1013
10
15
10
17
10
19
10
21
Pho
t/s/
0.1%
bw/m
m2 /m
r2
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910keV
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9100keV
Photon Energy
ERLNSLS-IINSLS
Courtesy Timur Shaftan
16 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
Flux Calculation
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
Pho
t/s/
0.1%
bw
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910keV
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9100keV
Photon Energy
Courtesy Timur Shaftan
17 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
Possible Site Layout Compatible with NSLSII as planned
Possible Footprint
Vertical cut through the site
source
Dump
Linac I
Linac II
Return Arc
FEL Hall
~7m
Scale in [m]
18 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
Detail Footprint
Commissioning loop
FEL
Exp Hall
Possible Injection Scheme
Horizontally separated vertical bends
Lambertson septa
s
s
D
Scale in [m]
Scale in [m]
19 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
What needs to be done now:
• Include a small radial vault underneath the Eastside of the Ring• Rotate the facility footprint clockwise by ~25 Degree
25degree
20 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007
Conclusions
Due to a compressed schedule and limited resources it might not be possible to include extra long straights in a timely fashion in the NSLSII footprint
Intend to base a later upgrade to extra long straights on a footprint with 15-fold lattice symmetry
need to select potential positions soon, because we need
- to enlarge the tunnel at these locations somewhat
- to build-in some flexibility into the ratchet wall
In order to ease the later integration of an ERL/FEL driven by a superconducting LINAC as a major upgrade project, some small modifications of the NSLSII footprint appear to be advisable:
• A small clockwise rotation
• A small piece of tunnel underneath the East-side of NSLSII
• shielding issue cannot be resolved, would have to be addressed in a different way