1 bucket eradication status & action plans presentation to select committee on land &...

1

Bucket EradicationBucket EradicationStatus & Action PlansStatus & Action Plans

Presentation to Select Committee on Land & Presentation to Select Committee on Land & Environmental AffairsEnvironmental Affairs

Dated the 23Dated the 23rdrd of February 2007 of February 2007

Presented by: MEC MaferekaPresented by: MEC Mafereka

2

Definition of a Bucket System to Definition of a Bucket System to be Eradicatedbe Eradicated

Elimination of a historic plastic or any other Elimination of a historic plastic or any other form of bucket system in formalized areas form of bucket system in formalized areas and replacing it with a suitable approved and replacing it with a suitable approved alternative.alternative.

3

Current Status on Eradication of Current Status on Eradication of Buckets in the Free StateBuckets in the Free State

Total buckets 2004Total buckets 2004 160 000160 000 Current BacklogCurrent Backlog Jan 2007Jan 2007 88 791 88 791 Buckets eradicated to date Jan 2007Buckets eradicated to date Jan 2007 71 209 71 209 Funding required to eradicate current backlog @ Funding required to eradicate current backlog @

R9000/bucket as per Policy 2006 R9000/bucket as per Policy 2006 R799.1 millionR799.1 million Funding required to eradicate current backlog @ an average Funding required to eradicate current backlog @ an average

unit cost in the FS @ R12 534/bucket unit cost in the FS @ R12 534/bucket R1 113 billionR1 113 billion Funding available currentlyFunding available currently R 679.9 mR 679.9 m ShortfallShortfall R 566.1mR 566.1m

4

Current Status on Eradication of Current Status on Eradication of Buckets in the Free StateBuckets in the Free State

PROVINCE

Progress 1st quarter (Apr06-Jun06)

Progress 2nd quarter (July06-Sep06)

Progress 3rd quarter (Oct06-Dec06)

Buckets removed Jan07

Total Removed Apr06-Jan07

Backlog at end Jan 07

FREE STATE

SETSOTO 0 350 150 500 1,000 14,000

NKETOANE 330 300 90 0 720 9,060

DIHLABENG 234 1,170 100 0 1,504 3,213

LETSIMENG 0 120 180 220 520 1,349

MANGAUNG 0 0 0 0 0 9,500

MANTSOPA 0 0 0 549 549 5,069

MATJHABENG 1,156 0 100 2,851 4,107 8,279

MOHOKARE 0 294 0 0 294 1,537

NALEDI 0 293 15 755 1,063 -584

MOQHAKA 2,580 290 60 0 2,930 2,859

METSIMAHOLO 2,067 0 0 0 2,067 156

MAFUBE 52 60 0 0 112 1,256

MASILONYANA 200 100 60 0 360 7,130

NALA 0 0 0 0 0 9,026

TSWELOPELE 0 80 0 0 80 3,547

TIKOLOGO 0 0 0 0 0 3,718

KOPANONG 0 0 0 0 0 3,244

PHUMELELA 0 110 338 1,588 2,036 685

MAL A PHOFUNG 0 0 0 0 0 300

NGWATHE 2,212 2,601 27 0 4,840 5,447

FS TOTAL 8,831 5,768 1,120 6,463 22,182 88,791

5

Delivery Hot Spot Areas in the Delivery Hot Spot Areas in the Free State Free State • The Free State has challenges of Water The Free State has challenges of Water

Resources in the following Municipal areas:Resources in the following Municipal areas:

DihlabengDihlabeng Sterkfontein-QwaqwaSterkfontein-Qwaqwa NketoaneNketoane NgwatheNgwathe Jagersfontien-FauresmithJagersfontien-Fauresmith Rouxville-SmithfieldRouxville-Smithfield TokologoTokologo

• As a result, it becomes extremely difficult to As a result, it becomes extremely difficult to eradicate buckets with waterborne sanitation.eradicate buckets with waterborne sanitation.

6

Delivery Hot Spot Areas in the Delivery Hot Spot Areas in the Free State (Cont …)Free State (Cont …)

n Most municipalities have capacity problems with their Most municipalities have capacity problems with their sewer treatment plants, they will require upgrading and sewer treatment plants, they will require upgrading and the province has a short fall of R500 million.the province has a short fall of R500 million.

n Few existing sewer treatment plants have spare Few existing sewer treatment plants have spare capacity.capacity.

n Some municipalities are currently not eradicating buckets Some municipalities are currently not eradicating buckets until they have DoRA allocations in the new financial until they have DoRA allocations in the new financial

year year (see slide on current status on eradication)(see slide on current status on eradication)

7

Potential Problem Areas in Potential Problem Areas in WSAsWSAs

n Most municipalities experience shortage of technical Most municipalities experience shortage of technical skills, the department of LG&H together with DWAF have skills, the department of LG&H together with DWAF have made available engineers to assist with technical made available engineers to assist with technical supervision at the WSAs.supervision at the WSAs.

n A water supply master plan has been developed and it A water supply master plan has been developed and it should be implemented as soon as funding is availableshould be implemented as soon as funding is available

n A decision making tool to guide municipalities for the A decision making tool to guide municipalities for the choice of sanitation of technology, referred to as the choice of sanitation of technology, referred to as the sanitation strategy document, has been developed & sanitation strategy document, has been developed & municipalities to adhere to it.municipalities to adhere to it.

8

Potential Problem Areas in Potential Problem Areas in WSAsWSAs (Cont…) (Cont…)

• Enforce implementation role-out plan as Enforce implementation role-out plan as presented, through continuous monitoringpresented, through continuous monitoring

• Review unit cost to meet current average Review unit cost to meet current average in FSin FS

• Obtain additional R 566 million to enable Obtain additional R 566 million to enable the eradication of 45 000 units not yet the eradication of 45 000 units not yet fundedfunded

• Ensure that detail action plans, focused on Ensure that detail action plans, focused on sustainability are being implementedsustainability are being implemented

9

Expenditure Performance Expenditure Performance To Jan 2007To Jan 2007

Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %

Letsemeng (FS161) 5,229,898.97 2,178,388.78 42% 4,312,000.00 4,312,000.00 100% - - 0%

Kopanong (FS162) 5,735,882.48 - 0% 4,737,040.00 2,471,265.25 52% 10,000,000.00 - 0%

Mohokare (FS163) 4,081,213.10 - 0% 8,649,840.00 5,966,827.85 69% - - 0%

Xhariep (DC16)

Naledi (FS171) 3,488,097.29 3,168,850.00 91% 4,145,600.00 3,324,555.13 80% - - 0%

Mangaung (FS172) 84,955,938.53 52,478,523.12 62% - - 0% 2,000,000.00 - 0%

Mantsopa (FS173) 7,186,380.09 4,431,700.33 62% 7,359,121.00 5,696,101.09 77% 9,100,000.00 4,601,447.32 51%

Motheo (DC17)

Masilonyana (FS181) 10,423,575.79 2,674,606.24 26% 29,320,696.50 8,875,356.31 30% - - 0%

Tokologo (FS182) 5,077,338.58 1,607,296.34 32% 5,303,914.00 2,759,323.79 52% - - 0%

Tswelopele (FS183) 8,147,798.58 5,241,800.89 64% 6,937,025.00 4,780,181.27 69% - - 0%

Matjhabeng (FS184) 68,130,408.67 1,101,545.29 2% 15,602,145.00 940,817.84 6% - - 0%

Nala (FS185) 16,993,205.86 16,138,671.91 95% 9,191,500.00 3,491,428.13 38% - - 0%

Lejweleputswa (DC18)

Setsoto (FS191) 24,420,561.24 13,747,512.53 56% 7,505,503.00 7,505,503.00 100% - - 0%

Dihlabeng (FS192) 15,708,677.60 10,861,168.22 69% 4,690,036.50 4,690,036.50 100% - - 0%

Nketoana (FS193) 9,446,462.92 4,784,688.08 51% 5,807,000.00 4,420,381.20 76% - - 0%

Maluti-a-Phofung (FS194) 50,946,080.03 33,144,387.25 65% - - 0% - - 0%

Phumelela (FS195) 6,829,988.03 2,895,628.61 42% 9,552,280.00 9,552,280.00 100% - - 0%

Thabo Mofutsanyana (DC19) 20,447,308.55 1,971,409.68 10% - - 0% - - 0%

Moqhaka (FS201) 13,999,129.61 14,616,544.42 104% 5,082,760.00 4,435,681.23 87% - - 0%

Ngwathe (FS203) 15,251,956.60 8,637,567.48 57% 7,641,980.50 4,855,155.57 64% - - 0%

Metsimaholo (FS204) 14,077,195.66 7,516,845.89 53% 2,554,120.00 2,554,120.00 100% - - 0%

Mafube (FS205) 6,555,860.30 3,582,012.00 55% 7,270,000.00 4,731,520.58 65% - - 0%

Fezile Dabi (DC20)

397,132,958.48 190,779,147.06 48% 145,662,561.50 85,362,534.74 59% 21,100,000.00 4,601,447.32 22%

FREE STATE PROVI NCE: FI NANCI ALS 2006/ 2007: 31 J anuary 2007

MunicipalityMIG 2006/ 2007 Bucket Eradication SMIF

10

Budget Constraints Budget Constraints

Current BacklogCurrent Backlog Jan 2007Jan 2007 88 791 88 791 Buckets eradicated to date Jan 2007Buckets eradicated to date Jan 2007 71 209 71 209 Funding required to eradicate current backlog @ Funding required to eradicate current backlog @

R9000/bucket as per Policy 2006 R9000/bucket as per Policy 2006 R799.1 millionR799.1 million Funding required to eradicate current backlog @ an average Funding required to eradicate current backlog @ an average

unit cost in the FS @ R12 534/bucket unit cost in the FS @ R12 534/bucket R1 113 billionR1 113 billion Funding available currentlyFunding available currently R 679.9 mR 679.9 m ShortfallShortfall R 566.1mR 566.1m

11

Provincial Delivery ConstraintsProvincial Delivery Constraints

• Shortage of funding to eliminate all buckets by October Shortage of funding to eliminate all buckets by October 2007 2007

• Ceiling cost per bucket currently of R9000 is not Ceiling cost per bucket currently of R9000 is not adequate vs. the current average cost of R12 534adequate vs. the current average cost of R12 534

• Poor attendance by municipal key staff and politicians in Poor attendance by municipal key staff and politicians in most meetings most meetings

• No proper roll out plans were available at municipalities No proper roll out plans were available at municipalities during the bucket eradication workshopsduring the bucket eradication workshops

• Shortage of water in certain municipalities Shortage of water in certain municipalities • Insufficient capacity on the existing bulk infrastructureInsufficient capacity on the existing bulk infrastructure• Some LMs are extending their Programmes to 2008/09 Some LMs are extending their Programmes to 2008/09

12

Implementation Plan MantsopaImplementation Plan Mantsopa

1. Workshop attendance

Mayor/Speaker partlyMunicipal Manager yesTechnical Manager yesChief Financial OfficernoCommunity yes

3. Performance To Date

Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Mantsopa 7,186,380 3,153,246 44% 7,359,121 4,656,194 63% 9,100,000 3,458,573 38% 23,645,501 11,268,013 48%

4. Implementation Role-Out Plan

Local Municipality Backlog at Jan 07Total

Available Funding

Units to be const.with

available funding (@ R12 534)

Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07 Apr-07 May-07 Jun-07 Jul-07 Aug-07 Sep-07

Units requirin

g Funding

Mantsopa 5,618 44,062,627 3,515 415 567 676 717 660 481 - 2,103

5. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action1 WR DWAF2 BI LM

3 FV NT/MIGNeed R17mil for 1700 buckets, R30mil for bulk infra; R1,4mil/ann O&M

Totals

Description

Bulk water supply to Tweespruit (e.g. pipe from Amelia dam)Upgrade & extension of STW in Thaba Patchoa, Hobhouse and Tweespruit

MunicipalityMIG 2006/2007 Bucket Eradication SMIF

Mantsopa Local Municipality

13

Implementation Plan MohakareImplementation Plan Mohakare


Mayor/Speaker partlyMunicipal Manager partlyTechnical Manager yesChief Financial Officer noCommunity yes


Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Mohokare 4,081,213 - 0% 8,649,840.00 5,966,827.85 69% - - 0% 12,731,053 2,269,235 18%


Local Municipality Backlog at Jan 07Total Available

Funding

Units to be const.with available

funding (@ R12 534)


Units requirin

g Funding

Mohokare 1,537 16,601,655 1,325 111 145 174 194 203 197 173 127 - 212

5. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action1 WR LM/DWAF2 BI LM3 FV MIGFunding allocation and cash flow problem.

Totals

Description

Water resource to Rouxville, Smithfield and Zastron to be upgraded. Agree on best suitable options.Fasttract Oxidation dam upgrading in Zastron and Smithfield to accept sewage. Survey, submit BP for replacement of old AC water supply pipes utilizing Grant Materials


Mohakare Local Municipality

14

Implementation Plan NalediImplementation Plan Naledi


Mayor/Speaker yesMunicipal Manager noTechnical Manager yesChief Financial Officer noCommunity yes


Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Naledi 3,488,097.29 2,996,812.68 86% 4,145,600.00 3,139,842.08 76% - - 0% 7,633,697.29 6,136,654.76 80%


Local Municipality Backlog at Jan 07Total Available

Funding

Units to be const.with available

funding (@ R12 534)


Units requirin

g Funding

Naledi 171 2,142,908 171 30 60 81 0

5. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action1 SL LM

Totals

Description

Fast track implementation of Oxidation dam upgrading in Wepener to accept sewage (BP not yet submitted). Attend to sewage spillage in Dewetsdorp.


Naledi Local Municipality

15

Implementation Plan LetsemengImplementation Plan Letsemeng


Mayor/Speaker noMunicipal Manager noTechnical Manager yesChief Financial OfficernoCommunity yes


Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Letsemeng 5,229,899 712,838 14% 4,312,000 2,607,097 60% - - 0% 9,541,899 3,319,935 35%



Available Funding




Units requirin

g Funding

Letsemeng 1,349 12,138,753 968 114 156 186 197 182 132 - 380

5. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action1 WR DWAF2 Inst LM3 FV LMLow affordability & need for improved cost recovery (low financial viability)

Totals

Description

Bulk water supply to Petrusburg & supplementation to Jacobsdal & LuckhoffLack of skills and capacity to operate bulk infrastructure (STW & WTW) & cost recovery


Letsemeng Local Municipality

16

Implementation Plan KopanongImplementation Plan Kopanong


Mayor/Speaker partlyMunicipal Manager noTechnical Manager yesChief Financial OfficernoCommunity yes


Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Kopanong 5,735,882 - 0% 4,737,040 2,022,264 43% 10,000,000 - 0% 20,472,922 2,022,264 10%



Available Funding




Units requirin

g Funding

Kopanong 3,244 24,287,376 1,938 229 312 373 395 364 265 - 1,306

4. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action1 WR/FV LM2 BI/Inst LM3 SL/FV LM

Water resource cannot accommodate increased water requirement. LM and community can't afford increased O&M cost evident from already existing debt.Oxidation ponds overflowing in Springfontein, Reddersburg, Faurismith and Edenburg. Although areas can not accept increased sewage runoff, upgrading project have not been initiated as they have not apparently not been identified in the ISP's. O&M not effeBuckets in Ha-Rasebei (350) not yet registered with MIG. 185 VIP's in Bethulie being upgraded to water borne sanitation.

Bucket Eradication SMIF Totals

Description

Kopanong Local Municipality

MunicipalityMIG 2006/2007

17

Implementation Plan MangaungImplementation Plan Mangaung


Mayor/Speaker noMunicipal Manager noTechnical Manager yesChief Financial OfficeryesCommunity no


Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Mangaung 84,955,939 51,728,181 61% - - 0% 2,000,000 - 0% 86,955,939 51,728,181 59%



Available Funding




Units requirin

g Funding

Mangaung 9,500 30,000,000 2,393 - 352 494 767 562 219 7,107

4. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action1 FV MIG/DWAF2 Inst LM3 SL DWAF

Description

MLM requires funding confirmation of full funding requirement by 15 Jan-07 before contractually committing the Contractors. Tenders have been called for and are closing on 15 December 2006City manager to intervene if procurement process is delayed by the capacity problems experienced by the supply chain management office Requiring confirmation from DWAF on application to upgrade Bloemspruit Sewage Treatment Plant (R8 mil) for 2010 bid.

MunicipalityMIG 2006/2007 Bucket Eradication SMIF Totals

Mangaung Local Municipality

18

Implementation Plan NalaImplementation Plan Nala


Mayor/Speaker noMunicipal Manager noTechnical Manager yesChief Financial Officer noCommunity yes


Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Nala 16,993,206 13,959,277 82% 9,191,500.00 3,491,428.13 38% - - 0% 26,184,706 15,776,430 60%



Available Funding




Units requirin

g Funding

Nala 9,026 81,787,674 6,525 642 855 1,025 1,126 1,130 1,010 738 - 2,501

4. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action1 Inst LM/MIG2 BI LM/MIG3 Int/FV LM

Reprogramming projects to meet the 2007 target. Their programming currently extends to the 2008/09 financial year, due to unavailability of funds and procurement delays.Move forward phased upgrading of upgrade planning of Wesselsbron Sewage Treatment plant in order to accommodate increased sewage runoff due to waterborne systems.No recently approved organogramme and uncertainty over roles and responsibilities due to management changes. Increased O&M requirement costs will place further demands on already limited staff capacity and high water tariffs.

Nala Local Municipality


Description

19

Implementation Plan MasilonyanaImplementation Plan Masilonyana


Mayor/Speaker partlyMunicipal Manager partlyTechnical Manager noChief Financial Officer noCommunity yes


Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Masilonyana 10,423,576 2,200,816 21% 29,320,696.50 8,875,356.31 30% - - 0% 39,744,272 9,315,813 23%


Local Municipality Backlog at Dec 06Total

Available Funding




Units requirin

g Funding

Masilonyana 7,130 69,620,200 5,555 546 728 873 958 962 859 629 - 1,575

4. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action1 FV LM

2 Inst LM

3 WR/BI DWAF/MIGWater shortage in Brandfort, Verkeerdevlei, Winburg; Upgrade of WTW in Theunissen, Soutpan

Totals

Description

Affordability of services (>R3mil/a O&M increase); Financial management

Lack of skills and capacity to operate bulk infrastructure (STW & WTW) & cost recovery


Masilonyana Local Municipality

20

Implementation Plan TokologoImplementation Plan Tokologo


Mayor/Speaker noMunicipal Manager noTechnical Manager partlyChief Financial Officer noCommunity yes


Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Tokologo 5,077,339 450,943 9% 5,303,914 867,494 16% - - 0% 10,381,253 1,318,438 13%



Available Funding




Units requirin

g Funding

Tokologo 3,718 25,236,420 2,013 296 415 485 472 345 - 1,705

4. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action1 WR LM/DWAF2 Ins LM/DWAF3 Env LM/DWAF

Description

Water resource problems in Boshoff, Hertzogville and Dealesville, consequently decided on VIPs. BP approval urgently required by DWAFNo approved organogramme or effective management structure. Quality monitoring and O&M subsequently problematic and lack of VIP maintenance plan currently threatening VIP service choice.DWAF required to assist with project implementation and water quality (especially nitrates) monitoring.

Tokologo Local Municipality


21

Implementation Plan TswelopeleImplementation Plan Tswelopele


Mayor/Speaker yesMunicipal Manager yesTechnical Manager yesChief Financial Officer noCommunity yes


Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Tswelopele 8,147,799 4,426,423 54% 6,937,025 4,780,181 69% - - 0% 15,084,824 9,206,604 61%


Local Municipality Backlog at Dec 06Total

Available Funding




Units requirin

g Funding

Tswelopele 3,547 25,744,394 2,054 302 424 494 482 352 - 1,493

4. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action1 WR DWAF/MIG2 FV LM

Totals

Description

BP approval urgently required by DWAF / MIGAffordability of WB sanitation possible tariff adjustment, water losses & condition of meters


Tswelopele Local Municipality

22

Implementation Plan MatjhabengImplementation Plan Matjhabeng


Mayor/Speaker yesMunicipal Manager partlyTechnical Manager yesChief Financial Officer yesCommunity yes


Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Matjhabeng 68,130,409 - 0% 15,602,145.00 940,817.84 6% - - 0% 83,732,554 - 0%



Available Funding




Units requirin

g Funding

Matjhabeng 11,130 90,602,145 7,229 853 1,165 1,391 1,473 1,358 988 - 3,901

4. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action1 BI LM2 FV LM3 SP LMIllegal connections & blocked sewers (need awareness & policing)

Totals

Description

Urgent need for bulk infra refurbishment & water loss reductionAffordability of WB sanitation due to high tariff, water losses & condition of meters


Matjabeng Local Municipality

23

Implementation Plan MetsimaholoImplementation Plan Metsimaholo


Mayor/Speaker yesMunicipal Manager partlyTechnical Manager yesChief Financial Officer noCommunity yes


Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Metsimaholo 14,077,196 5,196,985 37% 2,554,120 2,554,120 100% - - 0% 16,631,316 7,751,105 47%



Available Funding




Units requirin

g Funding

Metsimaholo 156 1,037,400 83 - 40 43 73

4. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action1 Inst LM

Totals

Description

Employ suitable skills for 34 vacancies at STW & WTW (training of new staff)

Metsimaholo Local Municipality


24

Implementation Plan NgwatheImplementation Plan Ngwathe


Mayor/Speaker yesMunicipal Manager yesTechnical Manager yesChief Financial Officer yesCommunity yes


Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Ngwathe 15,251,957 2,357,518 15% 7,641,980.50 4,855,155.57 64% - - 0% 22,893,937 3,859,263 17%



Available Funding




Units requirin

g Funding

Ngwathe 5,447 42,362,775 3,380 399 545 650 689 635 462 - 2,067

4. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action1 BI LM2 FV LM3 WR LMWater shortage in Edenville /Ngwathe (feasibility completed)

Totals

Description

Urgent upgrading of STW and refurbishment of WTW & pipes Shortfall of R50mil on bulk infra capital; finance for R1.9 mil/a O&M


Ngwathe Local Municipality

25

Implementation Plan MafubeImplementation Plan Mafube


Mayor/Speaker partlyMunicipal Manager noTechnical Manager noChief Financial Officer noCommunity yes


Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Mafube 6,555,860 2,888,296 44% 7,270,000.00 4,731,520.58 65% - - 0% 13,825,860 7,243,088 52%



Available Funding




Units requirin

g Funding

Mafube 1,256 11,267,608 899 106 145 173 183 169 123 - 357

4. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action1 BI LM2 WR LM3 Inst LM

Upgrade of WTW (except Frankfort) and all STWInvestigate water losses and take appropriate actionsLack skilled staff at STW and WTW

Mafube Local Municipality


Description

26

Implementation Plan MoqhakaImplementation Plan Moqhaka


Mayor/Speaker partlyMunicipal Manager yesTechnical Manager yesChief Financial Officer yesCommunity yes


Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Moqhaka 13,999,130 14,487,513 103% 5,082,760 4,435,681 87% - - 0% 19,081,890 18,923,195 99%



Available Funding




Units requirin

g Funding

Moqhaka 2,859 19,659,429 1,568 231 324 378 368 269 - 1,291

4. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action1 SL LM2 WR DWAF

Totals

Description

Socio-political pressure to upgrade 1600 dry sanitation to waterborneWater loss reduction; Water augmentation to Steynsrus (Kroonstad in medium term)


Moqhaka Local Municipality

27

Implementation Plan PhumelelaImplementation Plan Phumelela




Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Phumelela 6,829,988 2,895,629 0% 9,552,280 9,552,280 100% - - 0% 16,382,268 12,447,909 76%



Available Funding




Units requirin

g Funding

Phumelela 685 - - 1,273 1,000 448

4. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action1 FV MIG2 BS LM3 WR DWAFAwaiting DWAF feasibility study funding approvals for Memel & Warden and response on Vrede funding application

Totals

Description

Warden STW upgrading to be expedited to accommodate increased sewage run-off


Phumelela Local Municipality

28

Implementation Plan MalutiImplementation Plan Maluti




Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Maluti-a-Phofung 50,946,080 29,398,580 58% - - 0% - - 0% 50,946,080 29,398,580 58%



Available Funding




Units requirin

g Funding

Maluti-A-Phofung 300 1,995,000 159 80 79 141

4. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action1 WR DWAF2 BI MIG3 FV LM/MIGConcerns raised regarding high rock content and increased cost expected in Mabolela, Maubane and Rietpark

Totals

Description

Feedback on bulk water supply to Qwaqwa requiredAwaiting approvals for Harrysmith outfall sewer, Kestell Tholong sewer reticulation and Makholokweng bulk sewer and pumping main.

Maluti- a- Phofung Local Municipality


29

Implementation Plan NketoanaImplementation Plan Nketoana




Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Nketoana 9,446,463 4,062,854 43% 5,807,000.00 4,420,381.20 76% - - 0% 15,253,463 6,505,943 43%



Available Funding




Units requirin

g Funding

Nketoana 9,060 63,612,911 5,075 746 1,047 1,222 1,190 870 - 3,985

4. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action

1 WR LM/DWAF

2 SL MIG

3 FV DWAF/LMLM currently paying large TCTA charge for water use above quota, of over R2-00/kl. Although some demand management action have been taken, township areas are to be metered and cost recovery figures improved.

Totals

Description

Ministerial task team to be revived to evaluate possible use of Petronet Bulk supply between Bethlehem and Kroonstad, currently being investigated by LM. Line only available in 2009, but could result in huge saving if compared with regional supply scheme LM will consider upgradeable VIP's provided that MIG commit to making funding available for waterborne, once water resource issue has been resolved (2009). Seen as only way to resolve socio-political problem or prevent re-occurrence of Arlington situation


Nketoana Local Municipality

30

Implementation Plan SetsotoImplementation Plan Setsoto1. Workshop attendance

Mayor/Speaker yesMunicipal Manager yesTechnical Manager yesChief Financial Officer yesCommunity yes


Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Setsoto 24,420,561 8,080,620 33% 7,505,503 7,505,503 100% - - 0% 31,926,064 15,586,123 49%



Available Funding




Units requirin

g Funding

Setsoto 14,000 96,425,000 7,693 - 908 1,240 1,480 1,568 1,445 1,052 - 6,807

4. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action

1 WR DWAF2 BI LM

Totals

Description


Need for bulk water supply to Senekal (investigate local /regional options)Upgrade STW at Ficksburg (Marquard & Senekal in medium term); Reduce water losses

31

Implementation Plan DihlabengImplementation Plan Dihlabeng




Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure % Allocation Expenditure %Dihlabeng 15,708,678 7,052,015 45% 4,690,037 4,690,037 100% - - 0% 20,398,714 11,742,052 58%



Available Funding




Units requirin

g Funding

Dihlabeng 3,213 21,366,450 1,705 251 352 410 400 292 - 1,508

4. Key Challenges

Priority Type Action1 WR LM 2 BI MIG/LM3 WR LMAll individual sites metered, but water demand management programme to be initiated and bulk meters increased.

Totals

Description

Water resource problems to Paul Roux & Rosendal. Petronet Bulk supply between Bethlehem and Kroonstad, currently being investigated by LM. Line only available in 2009, but could result in huge saving if compared with regional supply scheme from BethelehemLM will consider upgradeable VIP's provided that MIG commit to making funding available for waterborne, once water resource issue has been resolved (2009).


Dihlabeng Local Municipality

32

Detail funding per LMDetail funding per LM

Funding Requirement i.t.o. R9000

ceiling

Funding Requirement i.t.o. average R12 534

Available 06/07 Funding

2007/08 Allocation

Total Available Funding

Shortfall against Ceiling

Shortfall against average

MotheoNaledi 171 -584 1,539,000 2,143,314 1,005,758 1,137,150 2,142,908 603,908 -406 Mohokare 1,537 1,537 13,833,000 19,264,758 6,380,605 10,221,050 16,601,655 2,768,655 -2,663,103 Mangaung 13,647 9,500 122,823,000 171,051,498 - 30,000,000 30,000,000 -92,823,000 -141,051,498 Sub-totals 15,355 10,453 138,195,000 192,459,570 7,386,362 41,358,200 48,744,562 -89,450,438 -143,715,008

XhariepLetsemeng 1,569 1,349 14,121,000 19,665,846 1,704,903 10,433,850 12,138,753 -1,982,247 -7,527,093 Kopanong 3,244 3,244 29,196,000 40,660,296 2,714,776 21,572,600 24,287,376 -4,908,624 -16,372,920 Mantsopa 5,618 5,069 50,562,000 70,416,012 2,702,927 41,359,700 44,062,627 -6,499,373 -26,353,385 Sub-totals 10,431 9,662 93,879,000 130,742,154 7,122,606 73,366,150 80,488,756 -13,390,244 -50,253,398

LejweleputswaNala 9,026 9,026 81,234,000 113,131,884 7,374,347 74,413,327 81,787,674 553,674 -31,344,210 Masilonyana 7,130 7,130 64,170,000 89,367,420 22,205,700 47,414,500 69,620,200 5,450,200 -19,747,220 Tokologo 3,718 3,718 33,462,000 46,601,412 4,436,420 20,800,000 25,236,420 -8,225,580 -21,364,992 Tswelopele 3,547 3,547 31,923,000 44,458,098 2,156,844 23,587,550 25,744,394 -6,178,606 -18,713,704 Matjhabeng 11,130 8,279 100,170,000 139,503,420 15,602,145 75,000,000 90,602,145 -9,567,855 -48,901,275 Sub-totals 34,551 31,700 310,959,000 433,062,234 51,775,455 241,215,377 292,990,832 -17,968,168 -140,071,402

Fezile DabiMetsimaholo 156 156 1,404,000 1,955,304 - 1,037,400 1,037,400 -366,600 -917,904 Ngwathe 5,447 5,447 49,023,000 68,272,698 6,140,235 36,222,540 42,362,775 -6,660,225 -25,909,923 Mafube 1,256 1,256 11,304,000 15,742,704 2,915,208 8,352,400 11,267,608 -36,392 -4,475,096 Moqhaka 2,859 2,859 25,731,000 35,834,706 647,079 19,012,350 19,659,429 -6,071,571 -16,175,277 Sub-totals 9,718 9,718 87,462,000 121,805,412 9,702,522 64,624,690 74,327,212 -13,134,788 -47,478,200

Thabo MofutsanyanaPhumelela 2,273 685 20,457,000 28,489,782 - - - -20,457,000 -28,489,782 Maluti-A-Phofung 300 300 2,700,000 3,760,200 - 1,995,000 1,995,000 -705,000 -1,765,200 Nketoana 9,060 9,060 81,540,000 113,558,040 3,363,911 60,249,000 63,612,911 -17,927,089 -49,945,129 Setsoto 14,500 14,000 130,500,000 181,743,000 - 96,425,000 96,425,000 -34,075,000 -85,318,000 Dihlabeng 3,213 3,213 28,917,000 40,271,742 - 21,366,450 21,366,450 -7,550,550 -18,905,292 Sub-totals 29,346 27,258 264,114,000 367,822,764 3,363,911 180,035,450 183,399,361 -80,714,639 -184,423,403FS TOTALS 99,401 88,791 894,609,000 1,245,892,134 79,350,857 600,599,867 679,950,724 -214,658,276 -565,941,410

Local MunicipalityBacklog at

(Dec 06)

Required Funding Available Funding Shortfall

Backlog at (Jan 07)

33

Establish Capacity ConstraintsEstablish Capacity Constraints

• Most rural municipalities are not able to attract the right Most rural municipalities are not able to attract the right caliber of skill/expertise they requirecaliber of skill/expertise they require

• No sufficient monitoring of water services delivery at No sufficient monitoring of water services delivery at municipal levelmunicipal level

• Low expenditure of project implementationLow expenditure of project implementation• Lack of capacity in engaging communities in service Lack of capacity in engaging communities in service

delivery issuesdelivery issues• Lack of capacity at municipal level to facilitate revenue Lack of capacity at municipal level to facilitate revenue

collection and credit control collection and credit control • Lack of technical expertise mostly in Water & sewer Lack of technical expertise mostly in Water & sewer

treatment plants, hence water quality problems treatment plants, hence water quality problems

1 bucket eradication status & action plans presentation to select committee on land &...

Documents

eradication of buckets

free state total buckets

current status

eradication slide

current backlogjan

free state setsoto03501505001

free state province

free state cont n