1 climate change: california experience to: appa national conference john roukema director silicon...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Climate Change: California ExperienceTo: APPA National conference
John Roukema
Director
Silicon Valley Power
June 16, 2009
2
Agenda
• California legislation
• Municipal approach to energy efficiency– Partnerships– Targets, reporting and progress
• Renewable energy portfolios
• Silicon Valley Power
3
California Legislation• Legislation over last few years
– State loading order for new resources– No new investment in Coal– Renewable Portfolio Standard
• Defined by local agency (Legislation pending to fix)• 33% by 2020• REC eligibility, Out of state vs. in state, oversight
– Set energy efficiency targets for ten years• Report annually
– Solar initiative sets goals for state• SVP’s share 30MW
• AB32 Climate Change
66
SB 1037
2009 Report
- KEMA Efficiency Measure Quantification
Studies 2006, 2008, 2009
- E3 Reporting Tool, v2006-08
- Custom Measure Guidelines
- Measurement & Evaluation Reports
AB 2021 Targets
2007 Report
Submitted
March 16,
2009Submitte
d
March 16,
2009
Submitted
October1,
2007Submitte
d
October1,
2007
Reporting Confirms Public Power Commitment
SB 1037
2007 Report
SB 1037
2008 Report
Submitted
March 17,
2008Submitte
d
March 17,
2008Submitted
March 15,
2007Submitte
d
March 15,
2007
Supporting Documentation
8
• $220 M spent on energy efficiency since 2006
• More than $3 of benefits for every $1 spent (TRC analysis)
• Work to sustain effectiveness– Program saturation occurs quickly– Requires creativity, constant change– Uncertainty in behavior-based
programs (not just lighting)
8
Public Power Views on Energy Efficiency
1010
• Focus on specific numbers guarantees analytical failure
• Trends much more important to gauge progress
• Key Implications for 2009– Economy may skew next year’s analysis– Customer behavior unpredictable
• Can’t force customer to invest in energy efficiency
Analytical Considerations
The Importance of Trends
1111
Realistic Trends Provide Effective Policy Tool
AB 2021 Targets
Program Savings
Public Power Savings vs Targets
Source: CMUA SB1037 Report, March 2009
1212
NCPA MemberCA Eligible
RenewablesAll
Renewables RPS GoalAlameda 55% 77% Maintain at least 40% renewables through
2020.Biggs 17% 65% 20% renewables as resources added.
Gridley 14% 67% 20% renewables as resources added.
Healdsburg 42% 65% 20% renewables.
Lodi 27% 52% 20% by 2010, maintaining at least that level going forward.
Lompoc 30% 55% 20% with no specified date.
Palo Alto 19% 66% 33% by 2020. Interim goals of 30% by 2012.
Port of Oakland 8% 45% 20% by 2017.
Plumas Sierra 11% 54% 20% by 2017.
Redding 15% 41% 20% by 2017.
Santa Clara 30% 49% 33% by 2020.
Roseville 9% 27% 20% by 2017.
Truckee Donner 16% 22% 21% by 2010.
TID 4% 17% 20% by 2017. Note: new 100 MW wind project in 2009 will raise RPS above 24%
Ukiah 53% 74% Maintain at least 20%.
CA Eligible Renewables
All Renewables
NCPA Member Cumulative RPS
20% 42%
NCPA Owned Generation
72% 94%
2008 Annual RPS Status – NCPA
1. Renewable energy, expressed in percent of retail sales
2. California eligible is defined in Section 399.12 of the Public Utilities Code
NCPA Members
Eligible Renewables
4% - 55%
All Renewables
17% - 77%
13
Silicon Valley Power
• Municipal Utility– Owned and Operated by the City of Santa Clara
• 117,000 residents• 51,000 Customers
– Clean, reliable, competitively priced electricity– 490 MW Peak Load– 3,000 Gwh/year– 73% load factor– 90% of Sales are Commercial and Industrial
14
Silicon Valley Power• SVP Owns and Operates 7 Power Plants
– Four small hydro plants– Natural gas combined cycle and peaking plants– Cogeneration plant– 24 hour trading and scheduling
• SVP Partners in 9 Power Plants– Northern California Power Agency (NCPA)
• Geothermal, Large Hydro, Natural gas
– MSR Public Power Agency (MSR)• Coal and Wind
– Transmission Agency of Northern California (TANC)
18
Where does this leave SVP?
• Carbon intensity: 650-750 pounds/kWh• Depending hydro condition
• With load growth need to be 450 pounds/kWh• Options
• Replace coal • Continue renewable development• Reduce load
19
Energy Efficiency Programs
For $5 to 6 M per year: – Commercial & Industrial Programs
• 25,860,913 kWh in first year savings
– Residential Programs• 914,530 kWh in first year savings
– Total FY 07-08 Savings • 26,775,443 kWh
– Goal for FY 07-08 was 25,765,000– Goal for FY 08-09 is 27,339,560
20
Residential Programs• Free In Home & Online Energy Audits• CFL Give a ways• Refrigerator Replacement & Recycling Rebates• Attic Insulation Rebates• Solar Electric Rebates• LCD Monitor Rebates• Whole House Fan Rebate• SVP Plug Ins Catalog• Solar Attic Fan Rebate • AC Replacement & Recycling Rebates • Pool Pump Rebate • Ceiling Fan Rebates
21
Commercial & Industrial Programs• Free Energy Audits• Free Design Assistance• Lighting Rebates• Motor & VFD Rebates• HVAC & Chiller Rebates• Commercial Washing Machine Rebates• Food Service Equipment Rebates• New Construction Incentives• LEED Incentives• Solar Electric Rebates• Customer Directed Rebate• Energy Innovator Grant
22
Third Party C&IEnergy Efficiency Programs
• Compressed Air Management Program (CAMP)• Keep Your Cool Program• Retrocommissioning Program• Express Efficiency Program • Data Center Optimization Program (DCOP) • Preschool Energy Efficiency Program
23
SVP Energy Innovator Awards
• Environmental Innovator– Santa Clara University (over 100 employees)– Echelon Corporation (100 employees or less)
• Energy Efficiency Partner– Sierra Meat Company (over 100 employees)– PDM Steel Services Center (100 employees or less)
• Green power Champion– Applied Materials (over 100 employees)
25
Lessons Being Learned• We are facing major challenges
– Won’t go away
• Be proactive in energy efficiency and renewables– Protect the customers interests
– Provides validity to concerns
– Reduces costs in long run
• Get your message out early and often– Take an active role in developing regulations
Public Power must focus on common concernsWe have more common ground than differences