1 dynamical and thermodynamical modulations of future...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Dynamical and thermodynamical modulations of future changes in landfalling 1
atmospheric rivers over North America 2
3
Yang Gao, Jian Lu, L. Ruby Leung, Qing Yang, Samson Hagos and Yun Qian 4
Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 5
Richland, Washington, USA 6
Correspondence to: Dr. L. Ruby Leung ([email protected]) 7
8
2
Abstract 9
This study examines the changes of landfalling atmospheric rivers (ARs) over the west coast of 10
North America in response to future warming using outputs from the Coupled Model 11
Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5). The result reveals a strikingly large increase of AR 12
days by the end of the 21st century in the RCP8.5 climate change scenario, with fractional 13
increases ranging between ~50% and 600%, depending on the seasons and landfall locations. 14
These increases are predominantly controlled by the super-Clausius-Clapeyron rate of increase 15
of atmospheric water vapor with warming, while changes of winds that transport moisture in the 16
ARs, or dynamical effect, mostly counter the thermodynamical effect of increasing water vapor, 17
limiting the increase of AR events in the future. The consistent negative effect of wind changes 18
on AR days during spring and fall can be linked to the robust poleward shift of the subtropical jet 19
in the North Pacific basin. 20
Keywords: Atmospheric rivers, CMIP5, global warming, Clausius-Clapeyron relation, jet 21
stream shift 22
23
3
1. Introduction 24
Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are narrow corridors of water vapor in the lower troposphere that 25
tranverse several thousand kilometers and transport over 90% of atmospheric moisture across 26
subtropical boundaries from their tropical source to midlatitude destinations globally [Zhu and 27
Newell, 1998]. In North Pacific, when atmospheric rivers make landfall at the coastal western 28
United States, they can bring about record-setting precipitations, causing water-related hazards 29
such as floods and mudslides [Dettinger, 2011; Lavers et al., 2011; Leung and Qian, 2009; 30
Neiman et al., 2011; Ralph et al., 2006]. ARs can also have benevolent impacts to society by 31
relieving drought impacts [Dettinger, 2013; Witze, 2015]. 32
Considerable efforts have been made to study the historical AR events in the Pacific and their 33
hydrological impacts to the western states of America [Dettinger, 2013; Jiang et al., 2014; Leung 34
and Qian, 2009; Neiman et al., 2008; Payne and Magnusdottir, 2014; Ralph and Dettinger, 2012; 35
Ralph et al., 2004]. Given that the water vapor holding capacity of the atmosphere increases 36
following the Clausius-Clapeyron relation [Held and Soden, 2006], the number of the ARs could 37
increase in an alarming rate as climate warms. Recently, [Lavers et al., 2013] examined ARs that 38
make landfall in the United Kindom in the simulations of CMIP5 and found that the frequency of 39
these landfalling ARs is projected to double by the end of this century under the RCP 8.5 climate 40
change scenario. Their results also suggested that the increase of ARs arises mainly from the 41
increase of moisture as climate warms, while the contribution from the change of winds that 42
transport moisture is hardly detectable. By analyzing the A2 scenario of CMIP3, Dettinger [2011] 43
found that the number and intensity of wintertime ARs making landfall in California remain 44
roughly unchanged by the end of the 21st century, but the years with many AR episodes and the 45
number of ARs with much-larger-than-historical water vapor transport is projected to increase. 46
4
More recently, [Warner et al., 2015] evaluated ARs along the North America west coast 47
simulated by 10 CMIP5 models under RCP8.5 and found the number of days of IVT above the 48
historical 99th
percentile increasing by almost three times by the end of the 21st century. However, 49
they did not detect ARs directly from the simulations, and their results for the 99th
percentile IVT 50
may be relevant mainly to the most intense ARs. 51
As the atmospheric circulation in the North Pacific and the related transient variability will be 52
significantly modified under global warming (e.g., [Barnes and Polvani, 2013; Gao et al., 2014; 53
Neelin et al., 2013]). This will inevitablly exert an influence on the distribution of landfalling 54
ARs, but dynamical changes are arguably less certain than thermodynamical changes. In this 55
study, we will take it as our central task to use the full CMIP5 archive to i) document the 56
seasonal characteristics of landfalling ARs over the west coast and their changes under future 57
warming and ii) identify the dynamical and thermodynamical contributions to these changes. 58
2. Data and method 59
A total of 24 CMIP5 models are used in this study (see Table S1 for the list). The climate 60
change statistics of ARs are obtained by contrasting two 30-year periods, i.e., historical period 61
1975-2004 and future warming period 2070-2099 under RCP 8.5 [Moss et al., 2010; Vuuren et 62
al., 2011]. To evaluate the performance of the CMIP5 models in capturing the statistics of the 63
ARs, four reanalysis datasets are used. More details regarding the CMIP5 data and the four 64
reanalysis data were discussed in section 1 in the supplementary material. We adopt the 65
canonical IVT-based criteria for detecting ARs, while taking into consideration the coarse 66
vertical resolution of the CMIP5 data archive (only levels at 1000hPa, 850hPa, 700hPa, and 67
5
500hPa are archived). The IVT was calculated by vertically integrating the moisture transport 68
between 1000 hPa and 500 hPa pressure levels [Lavers et al., 2012; Warner et al., 2015] as 69
𝐼𝑉𝑇 = √(1
𝑔∫ 𝑞𝑢 𝑑𝑝
500
1000)
2
+ (1
𝑔∫ 𝑞𝑣 𝑑𝑝
500
1000)
2
, 70
where g is the gravitational acceleration, q is layer mean specific humidity, 𝑢 and 𝑣 are zonal and 71
meridional wind, respectively. With one reanalysis dataset (CFSR), we also confirm that IVT 72
calculated using only 4 vertical layers as with the CMIP5 models introduced negligible 73
uncertainty compared to using 16 layers from 1000 hPa to 500 hPa. 74
Following [Lavers and Villarini, 2013; Lavers et al., 2012], we first identify the ARs that make 75
landfall in the west coast of North America between 25°N to 60°N, as indicated by the colored 76
grid cells in Figure 1. Except Alaska and northern Canada (they belong to the same group), the 77
coastal grids are grouped into 7 bins from 25°N to 60°N, each spanning 5° in latitude. For each 78
model, we first compute the daily IVT for the 30-year historical period (denoted as 𝑉1𝑄1) and the 79
30-year future warming period (𝑉2𝑄2), respectively. On each day, the maximum IVT along the 80
west coast is recorded and the corresponding grid is identified; it is then evaluated against the 81
85th
percentile of the IVT of the bin group that the grid belongs to. The 85th
percentile threshold 82
is estimated using all the daily data for each of the 8 bins for each model separately. 83
If the IVT value of the identified grid exceeds the threshold, we search backward for the 84
maximum IVT values among the four adjacent grids (northwest/west/southwest/south) and 85
assess whether any of them also exceeds the 85th
percentile threshold of that bin. The upstream 86
search continues until none of the IVT values of the four upstream grids exceeds the threshold, 87
yielding the track of a prospective AR. If the track spans longer than 2000 km [Neiman et al., 88
6
2008; Ralph et al., 2004], we compute its mean vertically integrated water vapor (IWV) by 89
averaging over all the grids occupied by this track. If the equivalent precipitable water of the 90
resultant mean IWV is greater than 2 cm, an AR is detected and all the track grids are construed 91
to have an AR day [Ralph et al., 2004; Wick et al., 2013]. Similar to Lavers et al. [2012], no 92
width criterion is considered in our AR detections. Figure 1 shows an example of an AR track 93
that battered the northwest coast of the US on Dec 28, 1998 from ERA-Interim. 94
3. Results 95
3.1 AR climatology in CMIP5 simulations 96
To evaluate the credence of the CMIP5 models in capturing the basic statistics of the AR events, 97
we compare the number of AR days within the 8 coastal bins in each season from the CMIP5 98
models against the four reanalysis datasets in Figure 2. Overall, the CMIP5 multi-model 99
ensemble mean (MME) tracks remarkably well the latitudinal and seasonal variations of AR 100
events, with an exception of the underestimation of the springtime number of AR days near the 101
southwest coast of the US (the bin between 35°N and 40°N). Consistent with previous studies, 102
landfalling ARs are more prevalent during fall and winter (e.g., [Neiman et al., 2008]). The peak 103
of the landfall shifts from the higher latitudes to the Californian coast from fall to winter; it 104
becomes smaller and retreats poleward more abruptly from the colder to warmer season. In 105
addition, there are also considerable AR events that make landfall in the Alaska coast in summer 106
(about 4/bin/season, see Neiman et al. [2008]). To further assess the fidelity of the CMIP5 107
models, we also composite the IVT, near surface velocity, and sea level pressure (SLP) based on 108
the AR events for CMIP5 multi-model ensemble (MME; Figure S1) and ERA-Interim (Figure 109
S2), and found consistent spatial distributions. 110
7
3.2 The change of ARs and thermodynamical and dynamical modulations 111
The impact of climate change on the statistics of landfalling ARs is elucidated in Figure 3 by 112
comparing the numbers of AR days estimated from the present-day simulations for 1975-2004 113
(black) with those from the future RCP 8.5 scenario for 2070-2099 (red), with the percentage 114
increase indicated on the top row of the numbers. The Student’s t test is used to assess whether 115
the MME differences are statistically significant, with the significant differences highlighted in 116
red. It is striking to see that the increases in all seasons over all the coastal areas of North 117
America are significant, and the west coast will experience a manyfold increase of AR days, 118
ranging from doubling (near California coast during winter and spring) to 6 times (along the 119
Alaskan coast in spring), depending on the seasons and locations. However, caution should be 120
used in the interpretation of the changes near the west coast of the US and Mexico during 121
summer, as AR events are very rare so the sample size may not yield a credible assessment. 122
In an attempt to separate the effect of wind changes or dynamical effects from that of increasing 123
moisture or thermodynamical effects in the projected increase of AR days, for each model, each 124
season, and each grid point, we rescale the present-day IVT by a factor of 𝑞𝑚2
𝑞𝑚1, where qm is the 125
thirty-year average of the IWV over the eastern Pacific basin (25°N to 55°N, 180°W to 130°W) 126
for the corresponding model and season, and subscript 1 and 2 indicate the present-day and 127
future episodes, respectively. The resultant IVT, referred to as 𝑉1�̅�2 symbolically, is used to 128
identify ARs in a conjured-up scenario in which the present day wind advects the moisture 129
scaled to have the same mean moisture of the future warmer climate. An example of the 130
probability distributions of historical, future and rescaled IVT is shown in Figure S3. We apply 131
the AR detection procedure to the rescaled data and the resulting statistics of ARs are plotted as 132
8
the blue lines in Figure 3. The difference between the blue line 𝑉1�̅�2 and the black solid line 133
(representing 𝑉1𝑄1) can be construed as the contribution of increasing water vapor in the future 134
climate to the total change of the AR frequency, and the corresponding percentage increases are 135
indicated by the numbers in the 2nd
row in Figure 3. Alternatively, one could also scale the future 136
scenario case (𝑉2𝑄2) back with the ratio of 𝑞𝑚1
𝑞𝑚2, and contrasting 𝑉2𝑄2 (red lines) with 𝑉2�̅�1 137
(orange lines) should result in the same thermodynamical effect. Quantitatively similar fractional 138
changes result from 𝑉2𝑄2 − 𝑉2�̅�1 compared to 𝑉1�̅�2 − 𝑉1𝑄1 (not shown). Through the rescaling 139
above, one may also infer the effect of the changing advection wind in the ARs, or the dynamical 140
modulation, by comparing 𝑉2�̅�1 against 𝑉1𝑄1, or 𝑉2𝑄2 against 𝑉1�̅�2. The percentage differences 141
of (𝑉2�̅�1 − 𝑉1𝑄1)/𝑉1𝑄1 are shown as the color-coded numbers in the 3rd row in Figure 3, with 142
the red numbers indicating significant differences at 95% confidence level. As a cross-validation, 143
we also compute the percentage changes of (𝑉2𝑄2 − 𝑉1�̅�2)/𝑉2𝑄2 and the result is qualitatively 144
consistent, but with non-negligible difference. 145
As explained in section 4 in the supplementary material, the condition for the rescaling to work 146
is that the rate of increase of the IVW in the ARs can be approximated by that of the seasonal 147
mean IVW, i.e., 𝑞𝑚2
𝑞𝑚1
𝑞1
𝑞2= 1. This holds true only approximately, as ARs are associated with 148
anomalously high moisture and strong low-level winds, which may respond to future warming 149
differently compared to the seasonal mean. But for most cases, the approximation has an error of 150
up to about 10% (see Table S2), which may be tolerable for the purpose of qualitative evaluation 151
for the relative contributions of dynamical and thermodynamical effects. For a sufficiently small 152
error, the dynamical ((𝑉2�̅�1 − 𝑉1𝑄1)/𝑉1𝑄1) and thermodynamical ((𝑉1�̅�2 − 𝑉1𝑄1)/𝑉1𝑄1) effects 153
from this rescaling exercise should add up to the total change. However, adding the 3rd
row to the 154
9
2nd
row does not result in the numbers in the 1st row in Figure 3. This is mainly because i) the 155
rescaling for the dynamical effect is very sensitive to the accuracy of the assumption 𝑞𝑚2
𝑞𝑚1
𝑞1
𝑞2= 1 156
(see the 2nd
term of equation S3) and ii) the co-variation component between the change of wind 157
and moisture is ignored in the rescaling approach. As such, the numbers listed in Figure 3 can 158
only be interpreted heuristically. Nevertheless, it is clear that water vapor increase plays an 159
overwhelmingly dominant role in the increase of AR days, while the dynamical effects are 160
ubiquitously negative or negligible for almost all seasons and over all latitudinal areas with only 161
one exception: a positive dynamical contribution of 39% to the increase of the spring time ARs 162
near the Alaskan coast. Statistically significant dynamical effects are found in the change of ARs 163
in spring and fall, with the largest dynamical reduction (by 46%) associated with the ARs that 164
influence the California-Oregon border in fall. This seasonal dependence of the dynamical 165
modulation is not by coincident; its connection to the underlying large-scale circulation will be 166
discussed later in this section. 167
Since this rescaling to estimate the dynamical effect has ignored the co-variation component, it 168
risks underestimating the dynamical modulation on the frequency of ARs. If viewing the co-169
variation component as being organized by the storm track dynamics so that it can be ascribed to 170
the dynamical effect, we can infer the total dynamical effect by taking the difference between the 171
first and second row of numbers. The result would be qualitatively similar (in seasonality and 172
latitudinal structure) to that from the direct rescaling, but with much larger magnitude. For 173
example, the total dynamical reduction on the ARs reaching the coast between 40°N and 50°N in 174
spring season amounts to >100% (compared to the modest numbers estimated from the direct 175
rescaling). In view of this ambiguity, a more rigorous approach to further quantify the dynamical 176
contribution to the AR change from changing atmospheric circulation is warranted. 177
10
The thermodynamical dominance on the increase of the ARs can also be illustrated by the 178
Clausius-Clapeyron (C-C) scaling following the approach of Lavers et al. [2013]. This is done by 179
rescaling the specific humidity by the C-C ratio of increase (7%/oC) based on the near surface 180
temperature increase averaged over the eastern Pacific basin (25°N to 55°N, 180°W to 130°W). 181
The resultant statistics of ARs (denoted by 𝑉1�̅�𝑐𝑐) is presented as the black dashed line in Figure 182
3 and its discrepancies (in terms of fractional difference) from the AR statistics based on scaling 183
by the actual future humidity (𝑉1�̅�2), i.e., (𝑉1�̅�2 − 𝑉1�̅�𝑐𝑐)/𝑉1�̅�2, are displayed in the fourth row 184
of numbers in Figure 3. It is interesting to note that the C-C scaling underestimates the actual 185
increase of the water vapor in the ARs throughout all seasons and for all coast areas of North 186
America. This appears to be consistent with the super-C-C increase of column-integrated water 187
vapor associated with the precipitation extreme simulated in an idealized aquaplanet model in Lu 188
et al. [2014]. However, its origin is less clear because ARs can draw moisture from multiple 189
pathways [Ryoo et al., 2015], so the C-C ratio and warming that influence AR moisture in the 190
future may deviate from the C-C ratio and the mean warming over the eastern Pacific that are 191
used in the C-C scaling. It suffices to say, however, that the C-C scaling largely explains the 192
CMIP5 ensemble mean change in AR days in the future. 193
3.3 The change of AR pathways 194
In view of the negative impact of the circulation changes on the occurrence of ARs, it would be 195
interesting to examine the related pattern of the AR pathways upstream in the North Pacific. To 196
this end, we first compute for each grid the frequency of occurrence of the ARs based on the 197
detected AR tracks for the present-day and future IVT, i.e., 𝑉1𝑄1 and 𝑉2𝑄2, respectively, as well 198
as the rescaled IVT 𝑉1�̅�2 and 𝑉2�̅�1. Then the fractional change of frequency through 199
operation(𝑉2𝑄2 − 𝑉1�̅�2)/𝑉2𝑄2 represents the dynamical modulation on the typical pathways of 200
11
the landfalling ARs at the west coast. The results for all four seasons are presented in Figure 4, 201
and these results, with larger sample sizes, are consistent with those from the operation of 202
((𝑉2�̅�1 − 𝑉1𝑄1)/𝑉1𝑄1) (not shown). Consistent with the negative dynamical effect on the AR 203
frequency at the landfall regions, the frequency of the AR pathways is also reduced by the wind 204
changes over the oceanic regions to the west of the North American coast. These reductions are 205
significant and robust for spring, summer and fall seasons. In winter, there is an increase of AR 206
pathways to the west of the Mexican coast, appearing to be guided by the enhanced westerly 207
wind there. However, this increase does not result in significant landfall. It is interesting to note 208
that the dynamically induced change of frequency is characterized by a southeast-northwest 209
dipole in both spring and fall, consistent with the northward and slightly westward shift of the 210
circulation pattern indicated by the composite SLP anomalies (contours in Figure 4a,c). 211
As the poleward shift of the subtropical high is most robust in spring and fall seasons [Simpson 212
et al., 2014] as the regional signal of the expansion of the Hadley circulation [Lu et al., 2007], 213
we underscore that a poleward shift of the mean circulation may also project on a weakening of 214
the ARs. This is because the poleward shift of the mean circulation structure will shift the origins 215
and pathways of the AR to higher latitudes, as ARs have been associated with wave breaking in 216
the storm track [Ryoo et al., 2013]. As a consequence the ARs may be weakened by the reduced 217
water vapor available from the cooler surface that provides the moisture for ARs near their 218
origins and/or along their pathways [Hagos et al., 2015]. Despite model consistency in projecting 219
negative impact of circulation changes on AR days, analysis discussed in section 5 of the 220
supplementary material suggests that uncertainty in projecting the meridional shift of the 221
subtropical high in the eastern basin of the Pacific contributes to considerable inter-model spread 222
in the change of the AR days during winter near the southern coast of the US. Hence the co-223
12
variation of moisture and wind changes that influence AR changes in a warmer climate should be 224
further investigated in the future. 225
Conclusions 226
We investigated the seasonal variations of ARs and their prospect of change in a warming 227
climate under the RCP8.5 scenario over the coastal regions of the western US and Canada, 228
including Alaska. Despite the relatively coarse horizontal resolutions of the CMIP5 climate 229
models to capture the full intensity of ARs, they do a very reasonable job in capturing the 230
observed seasonality in the frequency of occurrence of ARs and even the intensity of the 231
moisture transport therein. Under the future RCP8.5 climate change scenario, owing 232
predominantly to the increase of water vapor, the number of AR days increases ubiquitously for 233
all coastal regions and for all seasons, with magnitudes ranging from 50% to more than 6 times. 234
It is especially noteworthy that the greatest increase in frequency occurs to the ARs landfalling in 235
the Alaskan coast in summer, reaching almost 13 days by the end of the 21st century (compared 236
to 4 days in the present climate). 237
A simple rescaling analysis is performed to tease out the relative importance of the changing 238
water vapor and the changing wind to the projected increase of ARs. Almost for all seasons and 239
all the coastal regions examined, the thermodynamical (water vapor) effect dominates the 240
dynamical (wind) one in the total increase, with significant negative dynamical contributions 241
detected for the west coast of the conterminous US and Canada for spring and fall and a 242
significant positive dynamical contribution to the ARs reaching Alaskan coast in spring. On the 243
other hand, no significant dynamical effect can be detected in the wintertime change of the ARs, 244
13
which may be a result of large inter-model uncertainties in the projections of winter time 245
circulation pattern over the eastern North Pacific among the CMIP5 models. 246
We caution that for the rescaling to work, an assumption has been made that the fractional 247
increase of the IWV in the ARs, which tends to occur at the tail of the IWV distribution, equals 248
to the fractional increase of the seasonal mean IWV. As our results suggest that this is not a very 249
accurate approximation, the rescaling approach for the role of the dynamics should be taken as 250
heuristic. Nevertheless, confidence can be assigned to the qualitative conclusions about the 251
dynamical modulations on the ARs. 252
253
Acknowledgments 254
This study was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Biological and 255
Environmental Research (BER) as part of the Regional and Global Climate Modeling program. 256
PNNL is operated for DOE by Battelle Memorial Institute under contract DE-AC05-76RL01830. 257
We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme's Working Group on Coupled 258
Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP, and we thank the climate modeling groups (listed in 259
Table S1 of the supporting information) for producing and making available their model output. 260
261
References 262
Barnes, E. A., and L. Polvani (2013), Response of the midlatitude jets, and of their variability, to 263
increased greenhouse gases in the CMIP5 models, Journal of Climate, 26(18), 7117-7135. 264
Dettinger, M. D. (2011), Climate change, atmospheric rivers, and floods in California – A multimodel 265
analysis of storm frequency and magnitude changes, JAWRA Journal of the American Water 266
Resources Association, 47(3), 514-523. 267
14
Dettinger, M. D. (2013), Atmospheric rivers as drought busters on the U.S. west coast, Journal of 268
Hydrometeorology, 14(6), 1721-1732. 269
Gao, Y., L. R. Leung, J. Lu, Y. Liu, M. Huang, and Y. Qian (2014), Robust spring drying in the 270
southwestern U.S. and seasonal migration of wet/dry patterns in a warmer climate, Geophysical 271
Research Letters, 41(5), 2014GL059562. 272
Hagos, S., L. R. Leung, Q. Yang, C. Zhao, and J. Lu (2015), Resolution and dynamical core dependence 273
of atmospheric river frequency in global model simulations, Journal of Climate, 28(7), 2764-274
2776. 275
Held, I. M., and B. J. Soden (2006), Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming, 276
Journal of Climate, 19(21), 5686-5699. 277
Jiang, T., K. J. Evans, Y. Deng, and X. Dong (2014), Intermediate frequency atmospheric disturbances: A 278
dynamical bridge connecting western U.S. extreme precipitation with East Asian cold surges, 279
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 119(7), 2013JD021209. 280
Lavers, D. A., and G. Villarini (2013), The nexus between atmospheric rivers and extreme precipitation 281
across Europe, Geophysical Research Letters, 40(12), 3259-3264. 282
Lavers, D. A., G. Villarini, R. P. Allan, E. F. Wood, and A. J. Wade (2012), The detection of atmospheric 283
rivers in atmospheric reanalyses and their links to British winter floods and the large-scale 284
climatic circulation, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 117(D20), D20106. 285
Lavers, D. A., R. P. Allan, E. F. Wood, G. Villarini, D. J. Brayshaw, and A. J. Wade (2011), Winter 286
floods in Britain are connected to atmospheric rivers, Geophysical Research Letters, 38(23), 287
L23803. 288
Lavers, D. A., R. P. Allan, G. Villarini, B. Lloyd-Hughes, D. J. Brayshaw, and A. J. Wade (2013), Future 289
changes in atmospheric rivers and their implications for winter flooding in Britain, Environmental 290
Research Letters, 8(3), 034010. 291
15
Leung, L. R., and Y. Qian (2009), Atmospheric rivers induced heavy precipitation and flooding in the 292
western U.S. simulated by the WRF regional climate model, Geophysical Research Letters, 36(3), 293
L03820. 294
Lu, J., G. A. Vecchi, and T. Reichler (2007), Expansion of the Hadley cell under global warming, 295
Geophysical Research Letters, 34(6), L06805. 296
Lu, J., L. Ruby Leung, Q. Yang, G. Chen, W. D. Collins, F. Li, Z. Jason Hou, and X. Feng (2014), The 297
robust dynamical contribution to precipitation extremes in idealized warming simulations across 298
model resolutions, Geophysical Research Letters, 41(8), 2014GL059532. 299
Moss, R. H., et al. (2010), The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment, 300
Nature, 463, 747-756. 301
Neelin, J. D., B. Langenbrunner, J. E. Meyerson, A. Hall, and N. Berg (2013), California winter 302
precipitation change under global warming in the coupled model intercomparison project phase 5 303
ensemble, Journal of Climate, 26(17), 6238-6256. 304
Neiman, P. J., F. M. Ralph, G. A. Wick, J. D. Lundquist, and M. D. Dettinger (2008), Meteorological 305
characteristics and overland precipitation impacts of atmospheric rivers affecting the west coast 306
of North America based on eight years of SSM/I satellite observations, Journal of 307
Hydrometeorology, 9(1), 22-47. 308
Neiman, P. J., L. J. Schick, F. M. Ralph, M. Hughes, and G. A. Wick (2011), Flooding in western 309
washington: the connection to atmospheric rivers, Journal of Hydrometeorology, 12(6), 1337-310
1358. 311
Payne, A. E., and G. Magnusdottir (2014), Dynamics of landfalling atmospheric rivers over the north 312
Pacific in 30 years of MERRA reanalysis, Journal of Climate, 27(18), 7133-7150. 313
Ralph, F. M., and M. D. Dettinger (2012), Historical and national perspectives on extreme west coast 314
precipitation associated with atmospheric rivers during December 2010, Bulletin of the American 315
Meteorological Society, 93(6), 783-790. 316
16
Ralph, F. M., P. J. Neiman, and G. A. Wick (2004), Satellite and CALJET aircraft observations of 317
atmospheric rivers over the eastern north Pacific Ocean during the winter of 1997/98, Monthly 318
Weather Review, 132(7), 1721-1745. 319
Ralph, F. M., P. J. Neiman, G. A. Wick, S. I. Gutman, M. D. Dettinger, D. R. Cayan, and A. B. White 320
(2006), Flooding on California's Russian River: role of atmospheric rivers, Geophysical Research 321
Letters, 33(13), L13801. 322
Ryoo, J.-M., D. E. Waliser, D. W. Waugh, S. Wong, E. J. Fetzer, and I. Fung (2015), Classification of 323
atmospheric river events on the U.S. West Coast using a trajectory model, Journal of Geophysical 324
Research: Atmospheres, 2014JD022023. 325
Ryoo, J.-M., Y. Kaspi, D. W. Waugh, G. N. Kiladis, D. E. Waliser, E. J. Fetzer, and J. Kim (2013), 326
Impact of Rossby Wave Breaking on U.S. West Coast Winter Precipitation during ENSO Events, 327
Journal of Climate, 26(17), 6360-6382. 328
Simpson, I. R., T. A. Shaw, and R. Seager (2014), A diagnosis of the seasonally and longitudinally 329
varying midlatitude circulation response to global warming, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 330
71(7), 2489-2515. 331
Vuuren, D., et al. (2011), The representative concentration pathways: an overview, Climatic Change, 332
109(1-2), 5-31. 333
Warner, M. D., C. F. Mass, and E. P. Salathé (2015), Changes in winter atmospheric rivers along the 334
North American west coast in CMIP5 climate models, Journal of Hydrometeorology, 16(1), 118-335
128. 336
Wick, G. A., P. J. Neiman, and F. M. Ralph (2013), Description and validation of an automated objective 337
technique for identification and characterization of the integrated water vapor signature of 338
atmospheric rivers, Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on, 51(4), 2166-2176. 339
Witze, A. (2015), California study targets rivers in the sky, Nature, 517(7535), 424-425. 340
Zhu, Y., and R. E. Newell (1998), A proposed algorithm for moisture fluxes from atmospheric rivers, 341
Monthly Weather Review, 126(3), 725-735. 342
17
Figures 343
344
Figure 1. An example of IVT distribution associated with an atmospheric river event on Dec 28 1998 from ERA-345
Interim reanalysis data. Only IVT greater than 400 kg m-1
s-1
(close to 85th
percentile of historical period) is shown. 346
The black contours indicate the daily total precipitation on that day, with a minimum contour value of 4 mm, at 2 347
mm interval. The color-coded squares are the grids used to detect landfalling ARs, and grids with the same color 348
belong to the same latitude bin. 349
350
351
352
353
354
355
18
356
Figure 2. Seasonal variations of the number of atmospheric river days in the eight latitudinal bins from 25° to 60°N 357
estimated from each of the CMIP5 models (gray) and their MME mean (blue line) during 1975-2004, and from four 358
reanalysis data sets: CFSR (solid red), ERA-INTERIM (solid green), MERRA (dashed red), and NCEP1 (dashed 359
green) during 1979-2004. 360
19
361
Present: 𝑉1𝑄1 RCP8.5: 𝑉2𝑄2 𝑉2�̅�1 𝑉1�̅�2 362
Figure 3. Number of AR days by seasons for 8 latitudinal bins along the x-axis for the present day (1975-2004, 363
black) and future climate under RCP8.5 (2070-2099, red) simulated by the CMIP5 MME. Also shown are the 364
number of AR days determined by rescaling the future IVT (𝑉2�̅�1, orange), rescaling the present-day IVT 365
(𝑉1�̅�2, blue), and rescaling the present-day IVT with the C-C rate (dashed black). The shading indicates one 366
standard deviation of the inter-model spread. In each panel, the numbers in the first row indicate the percentage 367
change of AR days in future compared to present; the second row shows the effect of increasing moisture; the third 368
row shows the effect of wind changes; the fourth row indicates the differences between the rescalings using future 369
mean water vapor versus the C-C ratio. Red numbers are statistically significant at 95% level. 370
20
371
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of the MME mean dynamical modulation on AR frequency (in percentage) determined 372
from the future IVT versus present day IVT scaled by the ratio of future to present seasonal mean water vapor. Only 373
grid points with landfalling ARs detected in at least 10 CMIP5 models and more than 70% of these models agreeing 374
on the sign of the dynamical change are displayed. Overlaid are the composite sea level pressure differences 375
between the AR days determined from the future and scaled IVT, with thick dark gray contours for positive values 376
and light thin gray contours for negative values at contour intervals of 40 Pa. Similar differences for winds are 377
shown by the vectors. 378
379
380
381
382
383