1 engineering issues for fpccd vtx detector y. sugimoto kek july 24, 2007
TRANSCRIPT
1
Engineering issues for FPCCD VTX Detector
Y. Sugimoto
KEK
July 24, 2007
2
FPCCD 5m pixel size, 15m epi-l
ayer Accumulate signal during a
train and read out between trains Moderate readout speed ~
10Mpix/s No power cycling
Two wafers make a doublet, and three doublets make the detector
Operate at low temperature ~220K ladders are put inside a cryostat
5m
p- epitaxial layer
p++ substrate
n channel
5065
100
15
80
CCD
R-Z ViewLayer R (mm)
1 20
2 22
3 32
4 34
5 48
6 50
3
Readout channels
One readout channel covers 128x13000(L1-L2)/128x20000(L3-L6) pixels
For outer layers, larger pixel size may be acceptable and could be 128x13000
Wafer size (mm2) r.o. ch/wafer # of wafers # of r.o. channels
L1 10x65 16 15()x2(z) 480
L2 10x65 16 15()x2(z) 480
L3 20x100 32 16()x2(z) 1024
L4 20x100 32 16()x2(z) 1024
L5 20x100 32 24()x2(z) 1536
L6 20x100 32 24()x2(z) 1536
Total 220 6080
4
Engineering challenge
Power consumption and cooling method Wafer thinning and the ladder design Installation method …. …. ….
5
Power consumption Heat source
Ohmic loss in gate electrode (probably negligible)
CCD source follower and load resister
Readout ASIC Clock driver
CCD and ASIC must be inside the cryostat
Clock driver may be put outside the cryostat
Most of power is consumed by “drivers”
No heat source in the image area
Our R&D goal: Electronics: < 100 W in the cryostatMechanics: Compatible with 100W
6
Power consumption
R&D status Sensor R&D
First custom CCD in FY2007 4ch/chip, 4 different source follower designs Smallest power consuming channel: ~10mW/ch
Readout ASIC Amp, CDS, and charge-sharing SAR ADC Design completed, submission in September 4ch/chip < 10mW/ch if output is not connected (driving 100
load with 1V pulse consumes ~10mW!)
7
Wafer thinning Two methods are considered
Partial thinning by etching (like DEPFET collab) Easy to handle More material (thick frame)
Total thinning by etching or mechanical method Less material Hard to handle (wire bonding OK?) Flatness ?
8
Partial thinning Sample CCDs; Front side processed 300m thick frame and 20m thick image area Flatness is poor 20m looks too thin
9
FEA of Ladders
Si (CCD wafer) RVC (Reticulated Vitreous Carbon)
10 cm
Epoxy
Deformation by self-weight is calculated byFEA program COMSOL
10
FEA of Ladders Parameters (assumption)
Geometry
Density (g/cm3) X0 (g/cm2) E (GPa)
Si 2.33 21.8 110
Epoxy 1.15 40.9 3
RVC 0.05 42.7 0.031
Thickness Weight Radiation length
Si 50 m 0.01165 g/cm2 0.0534%X0
Epoxy 50 m 0.00573 g/cm2 0.014%X0
RVC 2 mm 0.0084 g/cm2 0.0234%X0
Epoxy 50 m 0.00573 g/cm2 0.014%X0
Si 50 m 0.01165 g/cm2 0.0534%X0
Sum 0.04316 g/cm2 0.1582%X0
0.08%X0/layer
11
FEA of Ladders
Results Maximum deformation:
Without gap : vmax=0.536 m
With 0.2mm gap : vmax
=0.723 m For longer ladders
vmax ~ l4 ~8.6 m for 20cm ladder without gap
12
Summary and future prospect
Among many engineering issues to be studied for FPCCD vertex detector, we have started study for Power consumption (sensor/ASIC R&D) Wafer thinning and ladder design
Due to lack of resources, these studies are at very primitive stage
As a long term goal (~2012?), construction of full size engineering model (dummy detector) would be necessary