1 ganesh iyer product line design and price customization part 1: decision process and optimization...
TRANSCRIPT
1Ganesh Iyer
Product Line Design and Price CustomizationPart 1:
Decision Process and Optimization Methodology
XMBA 206.1Summer 2008
2Ganesh Iyer
Examples of Versioning
Turbo tax http://www.turbotax.com/
Statistical Software Packages http://www.systat.com/store/
Adobe http://www.adobe.com/products/main.html
3Ganesh Iyer
Microsoft Office: Product Line (Versioning) in Action
Office 2000Developer
Office 2000Premium
Office 2000Professional
Office 2000Small Business
Office 2000Standard
4Ganesh Iyer
Palm Pilot: Product-line in Action
Palmm505Color$449
Palmm500$399
Palm VIIx$399
Palm IIIxe$179
Palm m100$129
Palm Vx$299
5Ganesh Iyer
Cambridge Software Corporation (CSC)
If CSC offers only one version of Modeler, which version should it
offer? At what price?
Should the firm offer more than one version of Modeler? If so, which versions should it offer? At what prices?
6Ganesh Iyer
Cost, Demand, and Willingness-to-Pay Estimates
"Student" "Commerical" "Industrial"
Product Development Cost $100,000 $200,000 $500,000
Variable Cost Per Unit $15 $25 $35
Market Segment Size Segment Willingness to PayDev. Cost (Per Unit)
Large, Multidivisional 5,000 $150,000 $150 $1,200 $2,500 Corporations
Corporate R&D and 2,000 $100,000 $100 $1,000 $2,000 University Laboratories
Consultants and 20,000 $200,000 $200 $300 $600 Professional Companies
Small Buisnesses 15,000 $200,000 $175 $225 $300
Students 500,000 $300,000 $50 $60 $100
7Ganesh Iyer
Product Line Pricing: Optimization Methodology and Decision Process
Key Principle: Backwards Induction Optimization Procedure (Decision Tree)
Two Step Decision Process = Backwards Induction
Stage 2Pricing and Targeting
Stage 1Product Choice
BackwardsInduction
8Ganesh Iyer
Decision ProcessStage 2: Pricing and Targeting for a given product
Suppose CSC introduces “student” version, what is the optimal price?
Relevant Costs» What are the relevant costs at this stage of decision making?
– segment development cost– variable cost (per unit)
» Is product completion cost a relevant cost at this stage?
Economic Trade-off: » unit contribution-margin vs. volume (# segments served).» choose the price which gives the maximum total contribution.» Total Contribution = Unit Price Volume - Segment Dev. Cost(s).
Can the optimal price of CSC be different from $ 50, $ 100, $ 150, $ 175 or $ 200?
9Ganesh Iyer
Student version
Table 1: Contribution Analysis for Modeler “Student” Version
Price Segments Served
Unit Contribution
Seg. Dev. Costs
Demand Total Contribution
(‘000s) $ 200 Consultants $ 185 $ 200,000 20,000 $ 3,500 $ 175 Consultants
Small Bus. $ 160 $ 400,000 35,000 $ 5,200
$ 150 Consultants Small Bus. Large Corp.
$ 135 $ 550,000 40,000 $ 4,850
$ 100 Consultants Small Bus. Large Corp. R&D, U Lab.
$ 85 $ 650,000 42,000 $ 2,920
$ 50 Consultants Small Bus. Large Corp. R&D, U Lab. Students
$ 35/$ 15*** $ 950,000 542,000 $ 8,020
*** CSC sells to student segment through college book stores which get 40 % commission so that
CSC nets only 60 % of the sale price of $ 50.
Above would imply that optimal price for “student” version is $ 50 at which all the 5 segments
are served and the Total Contribution from this version is $ 8,020,000.
If this version is chosen then the Net contribution after Product development costs is
8,020,000 – 100,000 = 7,920,000.
But is this really the case
10Ganesh Iyer
Single-version Case: Fixed Cost Trap
Segment Size 5,000 2,000 20,000 15,000 500,000
Segment Dev. Cost $150,000 $100,000 $200,000 $200,000 $300,000
"Student" $100,000; $15
$200 $185 $3,500,000 $3,400,000$175 $160 $3,000,000 $2,200,000 $5,100,000$150 $135 $525,000 $2,500,000 $1,825,000 $4,750,000$100 $85 $275,000 $70,000 $1,500,000 $1,075,000 $2,820,000$50 $35 $25,000 ($30,000) $500,000 $325,000 $7,200,000 $7,950,000
$15
Key Learning: Look out for Fixed Cost traps in decision making.
11Ganesh Iyer
Total Contribution Analysis for all products
Derive the Total Contribution if CSC instead offered “commercial” or “industrial” version » Backwards induction Management has already figured out its optimal
pricing policies in these contingencies.
Table 2: Contribution Analysis For “Commercial” and “Industrial” versions
Version Optimal Price Segments Served Total Contribution “Commercial” $ 225 Consultants
Small Bus. Large Corp. R&D,U Lab.
$ 7,750,000
“Industrial” $ 600 Consultants Large Corp. R&D,U Lab.
$ 14, 805,000
12Ganesh Iyer
Step 2: Product ChoiceNet contribution analysis
Choose the version which gives the maximum Net Contribution » What becomes relevant at this stage?
Product Development cost» Student = 100,000
» Commercial = 200,000
» Industrial = 500,000Table 3: Optimal Choice of Versions
Version Optimal Price Segments Served Net Total Contribution
“Student” $ 50 Consultants Small Bus. Large Corp. R&D,U Lab. Students
$ 7,950,000
“Commercial” $ 225 Large Corp. R&D,U Lab. Consultants Small Bus.
$ 7,550,000
“Industrial” $ 600 Large Corp. R&D,U Lab. Consultants
$ 14, 305,000
13Ganesh Iyer
Optimal Single Product
Optimal Single product design means 3 interrelated decisions» Product = Industrial
» Price = $ 600.
» Targeting = 3 high-end segments viz. Large Corp., Labs and Consultants segments.
This is where pricing, product design and segmentation come together.
14Ganesh Iyer
Recap…two-stage process.
Stage 2Pricing and Targeting
Stage 1Product Choice
BackwardsInduction
15Ganesh Iyer
Single-version Case
Unit Large, Corporate R&D Consultants and Small Students TOTAL NETContribution Multidivisional and University Professional Businesses CONTRIBUTION
Corporations Laboratories CompaniesSegment Size 5,000 2,000 20,000 15,000 500,000
Segment Dev. Cost $150,000 $100,000 $200,000 $200,000 $300,000
"Student" $100,000; $15
$200 $185 $3,500,000 $3,400,000$175 $160 $3,000,000 $2,200,000 $5,100,000$150 $135 $525,000 $2,500,000 $1,825,000 $4,750,000$100 $85 $275,000 $70,000 $1,500,000 $1,075,000 $2,820,000$50 $35 $25,000 ($30,000) $500,000 $325,000 $7,200,000 $7,950,000
$15"Commerical" $200,000; $25
$1,200 $1,175 $5,725,000 $5,525,000$1,000 $975 $4,725,000 $1,850,000 $6,375,000$300 $275 $1,225,000 $450,000 $5,300,000 $6,775,000$225 $200 $850,000 $300,000 $3,800,000 $2,800,000 $7,550,000$60 $35 $25,000 ($30,000) $500,000 $325,000 $5,200,000 $5,850,000
"Industrial" $500,000; $35
$2,500 $2,465 $12,175,000 $11,675,000$2,000 $1,965 $9,675,000 $3,830,000 $13,005,000$600 $565 $2,675,000 $1,030,000 $11,100,000 $14,305,000$300 $265 $1,175,000 $430,000 $5,100,000 $3,775,000 $9,980,000$100 $65 $175,000 $30,000 $1,100,000 $775,000 $12,200,000 $13,780,000
16Ganesh Iyer
Product Line
In the single-version case CSC ignores the largest segment = students = 500,000. Why?» Negative price effect (reduction in unit contribution) outweighed the
positive volume effect (demand expansion).
Is there some other way to include the Students segment? » Offer 2 versions with Students segment buying one version and other
segments buying the other version?
Two possible options: (1) “Industrial” + “Commercial” versions or “Industrial” + “Student” versions.
Consider “Industrial” and ‘Student” version why? » In the single-version case, if CSC were to introduce “Commercial”
version, it would have ignored the “students” segment.
17Ganesh Iyer
Qualitative Benefits of selling to studentsCatch ‘em young
Pricing to lock consumers in youth» Apple
» Gaming
» WSJ student edition
» Pharmaceutical firms and medical interns.
What are the advantages?» Loyalty through consumer investments in learning
» Sell upgrades in future.
18Ganesh Iyer
Two Products: Pricing and Targeting
How will you price the student version?» Price_Student = $50.
Can you charge $ 600 for the Industrial version as in the single product case?» What are the considerations?
Considerations that are different in the pricing of 2 products compared to one product?» No purchase of high quality product does not mean zero purchase.
Table 4: Consumer Surplus with “Industrial” version @ $600 and “Student” version @ $50
“Student” version “Industrial” version
Large Corp $100 (= $150 - $50) $1900 (=$2500-$600)
Labs $ 50 (=$100 - $50) $1400 (=$2000-$600)
Consultants $ 150 (=$200 - $50) $ 0 (=$600-$600)
19Ganesh Iyer
Pricing the Industrial Version Key Principle: Self-Selection/Cannibalization
Table 5: Maximum Price for “industrial” version consistent with consumer “self-selection”
Surplus from Maximum Price for “Student” version “Industrial” version
Large Corp $100 $2400 (=$2500-$100)
Labs $ 50 $1950 (=$2000-$50)
Consultants $ 150 $450 (=$600-$150)
Maximum Price for = Willingness-to-pay (EV) - Surplus from“Industrial” version for “Industrial” version “Student”
version
20Ganesh Iyer
Contribution of the Industrial Version
Table 6: Revised Contribution Analysis for Modeler “Industrial” Version
Price Segments Served
Unit Contribution
Seg. Dev. Costs
Demand Total Contribution
(‘000s) $ 2400 Large Corp. $ 2365 $ 150,000 5,000 $ 11,675 $ 1950 Large Corp.
R&D, ULab. $ 1915 $ 250,000 7,000 $ 13,155
$ 450 Large Corp. R&D, U Lab. Consultants
$ 415 $ 450,000 27,000 $ 10,755
• Optimal price of “Industrial” version = $ 1950
• Optimal targeting is the 2 high-end segments (Large Corp. and Labs).
• Net Contribution from “Industrial” version is $12,655,000.
21Ganesh Iyer
Contribution of the Student Version
Other 3 segments buy the Student version.
Table 7: Revised Contribution Analysis for Modeler “Student” Version
Demand Unit Contribution Total Contribution (Net of Seg. Dev. Cost) Consultants 20,000 $ 35 $ 500,000
Small Business 15,000 $ 35 $ 325,000
Students 500,000 $ 15 $ 7,200,000
Less:
Product Completion Cost $ 100,000
Net Total Contribution: $ 7, 925, 000
22Ganesh Iyer
Product Line Design and Pricing: Summary
CSC introduced two versions– Industrial at $1950– Student at $50
This allowed Cambridge to increase profit from $14,305,000 to $20,580,000 (plus $6,275,000).
In addition, students are served leading to greater future potential as they move to commercial and industrial employment.
23Ganesh Iyer
Product Line Design
Part 2: Strategic and Managerial Considerations
24Ganesh Iyer
Product Line Strategy Pros & Cons
There are economic benefits to a product line pricing strategy using several products, but these benefits must be weighed against the costs
1. Management complexity and coordination.2. Potential consumer confusion = Diverse product line means less
focused positioning
There are questions that cannot be answered by numbers alone “What do the people in the firm really want?”
1. How does your sales force react to selling too many versions?
25Ganesh Iyer
Different ways to create product lines
Design to accentuate the needs of different groups of customers. Emphasizing customer differences allows you to extract, through the product line versions, a higher fraction of the total value you create.
Features to emphasize differences: » Speed of Operation – Mathematical software» Support -- Software with & w/o documentation. Minitab» Capability -- 7 versions of Kurzweil’s voice recognition software
differentiated on range & type of vocabulary
Need not be physical features» Time (Delay): PAWW Financial Network -- $50/month for real-time
quote & $8.95/month for 20-minute delayed quote
26Ganesh Iyer
How to Implement Product Lines
Identify the best features to distinguish the different versions of the product/service
Need to determine which features will be highly valuable to some customers but of little value to others.
Goal: Create the “right” # of versions -- targeted at the “right”
customer segments by setting the “right” prices.
Strategic Issue -- Cannibalization: Will the high-end customers buy the higher priced version? How to dissuade them from buying the lower priced version?
27Ganesh Iyer
How to Prevent Cannibalization?
How did we do it in the Cambridge case?
28Ganesh Iyer
Preventing Cannibalization: Disabling Attributes
Intel sells 486DX chip for $1000.
Intel disables the math coprocessor of the DX chip and makes the SX chip (thus incurring a cost of $50).
Intel sells the 486SX chip for $800!
So Intel sells a damaged product that actually costs more to make for a lower price.
What is going on here?
29Ganesh Iyer
Product Line Design: Disabling Attributes
Problem facing Intel when it introduced 486 chip (two types of early adopters):
E, G (50% of each type), E is willing to pay more and performs lots of math calculations
Res. Price Buyer Revenues
$1000 E $1000
$800 E & G $1600
What should Intel price the 486?
30Ganesh Iyer
Disabling Attributes
If Intel can charge different prices to different users
» $800 to G» $1000 to E
» Total: $1800
Price discrimination can earn the seller an extra 200!
But there is a caveat……..
31Ganesh Iyer
Disabling Attributes
The seller wants to charge G less than E for the same 486 chip.
At the same time, the seller has to prevent E from buying the product meant for G. What does the seller do?
The seller disables the math coprocessor for G!» Actually incurs a cost of doing so (say $10)
» But makes $200 extra from E.
32Ganesh Iyer
Controlling CannibalizationTwo Methods
Potential Cannibalization: If the low-end version is “too
attractive”, it may attract some customers who would other wise
pay a premium for the high-end version
Method #1: Cut the price of your high-end version to ensure that your high-value customers buy the high end version.
Method #2: Damage your low-end version “enough” to make it unattractive to the high-end segment
33Ganesh Iyer
34Ganesh Iyer
Learning: Optimal Product Line Design and Pricing
Point #1: Identify the attributes/features that are highly valued by some customer segments yet of little importance to other customer segments
Point #2: Greater the differences among the customers in their intensity of preference for the differentiating attribute, the wider is the product line.
Point # 3: Find the best way to reduce cannibalization.
Qualitative Issues while selecting # of Versions: Costs of complexity can be large. Consumers may get confused if the positioning of the different versions is
not distinct. Salesforce buy-in.
35Ganesh Iyer
Sequential versus Simultaneous Product Launch
In reality, firms can choose to introduce the different versions sequentially? If you chose to introduce the versions sequentially, what is the order of sequential introduction? Why?
What factors would you consider while deciding whether to introduce the versions simultaneously versus sequentially?