1). is it soup yet?...yes charles… you never owed me any money…as the money…the $5000, in the...

Indictment-Charles...Its going on 150 days...is it soup yet?

www-scannedretina.com - 1 of 14 - [email protected] - 714-964-4056

1). IS IT SOUP YET?

IS IT SOUP YET?

2). ObjectiveObjective:



The original intent:

The original intent of commissioning this project was for the creation of a community of legal scholars to participate in updating and existing indictment, submitted to the public venue by what is believed to be the National Liberty Alliance (NLA.)

3.1). Transcription-3Please find following…the salient points of the telephone exchange of March 15, 2018,

which prompted and created the ‘project’ to recreate and upgrade the publicly published (the suspected NLA created document ) ‘Indictment’ to become a formidable tool by which to pursue…▪ real justice for murdered American hero, Lavoy Finicum, ▪ highlight and promote the extraordinary work of several other notable Americans,

and ▪ to obtain the release of Randy Due.

3.2). Transcription-1Arnie….Greetings interesting times we live in… thank you for your response. The document

seems to be in line with what a legitimate indictment would appear to be to me and I'm not an expert.

3.3). TranscriptionCharles—-It is a good starting point if we have a competent legal team…We can build on that…

3.4). TranscriptionArnie….well my thought was…

suppose I have a process server deliver the document to Mr. Sessions even though it appears here he was copied…

But there's no guarantee.

Has this document actually been posted as it indicates with the case number it reflects



I N D I C T M E N T – Presented on behalf of the American sovereigns.

3.5). TranscriptionCharles—-Good…good… good…

I can give you halfhearted responses to what you're trying to engineer here…

or I could suggest to you that we get people like Hartford and a few other prominent scholars to go over and arrive at consensus and do it right…

and then put it in front of Mr. sessions or somebody

3.6). TranscriptionArnie…okay what will it take to do this?

3.7). TranscriptionCharles—-Well a little funding would help…

3.8). TranscriptionArnie…What do you need?

3.9). TranscriptionCharles—-

https://scannedretina.com/2018/03/29/i-n-d-i-c-t-m-e-n-t-presented-on-behalf-of-the-american-sovereigns/



I need to distribute to my law team I need to clear $100 to Hartford- $100 to probably this woman Mel -

perhaps you know Howard Griswold?

well if I can get a consensus between Howard Griswold and Hartford Vandyck

then…then…then…we can move forward with results from the document

3.10). TranscriptionArnie…Okay what what's the total budget that you estimate?

3.11). TranscriptionCharles—-For the entire project?

3.12). TranscriptionArnie…yes

3.13). TranscriptionCharles—-5…5 grand we could produce the results of that workable for five thousand dollars

A thousand to Hartford… I can give a thousand dollars to Howard Griswold become newly involved within my circle… still getting used to working the…

As a prominent scholar he kicks ass arnie…

and but but they are older guys and take no smoke and mirrors…

they got their own ways of doing things…

and I can build a consensus between them… and I believe I can…

we can make this fly.

3.14). Transcription



Arnie…okay send me an invoice PayPal invoice. Can you do that?

3.15). TranscriptionCharles—-I believe I can do that… anything else you'd like to chat about now

3.16). TranscriptionCharles—-I… I'm certain I can do this…

Hartford and Howard and I will get that approval to do this and you will… will… will… forward you …

might take me a day…

there's something to get the invoice all printed up there worked out for you…

not familiar with how to do that in PayPal but I'm sure I can do it…

yeah I should have an answer for you within 24 hours. (Arnie’s observation - Seems to recognize the urgency)

3.17). TranscriptionArnie…there is of course no guarantees…but we would be like to have some measure of

confidence among those involved in terms of what they believe we can accomplish.

because as I look at it… you know none of de facto players are legitimate.

Even Trump—but at least he is essentially pulling the same stunt as those who have claimed to be president over the last what 50 years—or hundred years.

But with Trump making a global statement and giving notice to the sovereignty of the American people…

how can anybody dispute that…

and as a sovereign Americans it's time for us to stand up and act like sovereign Americans!



3.18). TranscriptionCharles—-right on

3.19). TranscriptionSo based on what Charles proposed and assured…

The project was funded. Note the $5,000 was not a donation to the church.

3.20). Transcription



3.21). TranscriptionThe Switch…Shortly After the funds were received in a subsequent phone call Charles then revealed

some of those upon whom he had indicated he would rely to create the group of scholars were not available.

Charles—-Then I said four or five more words then she hung up the phone on me…it was really

cold and abrupt, and…and…and…so bottom line is I don't think I'm going to be able to bring in Howard. It would be a pleasant surprise if I can…but I'm very pessimistic about hearing anything more from Howard and another couple of people that she was really close with.

They seemed like honorable people to me that road on her coattails and she seems seriously peeved at me for I don't believe I gave her any legitimate reason to be peeved at me.

3.22). TranscriptionArnie…you see you are not the judge of that…



3.23). TranscriptionCharles—-I know…I know… if you feel like giving her a call and ask her about why Charles Stuart

is such a butthead maybe you will trigger her to explain to me why she's got a problem with me?

3.24). TranscriptionArnie…Well it must be pretty solid in her mind.

3.25). Transcription-2Conclusion:Arnie…As of April 15, 2018, no such community of legal scholars exists. Charles has stated he

is making progress…

It is time to recognize our short-comings and alter our course of action. It is time to admit failure of the initial agreement to materialize, lick our respective wounds and restructure the project?

4). Was the objective ever achieved?Was the objective ever achieved?

5). I "Deny" that i owe you any money, Mr Rosner.On May 15, 2018, at 3:51 PM, conferences-gc-usa <conferences-gc-

[email protected]> wrote:I "Deny" that i owe you any money, Mr Rosner.

I have already "Denied" the same, in past email communications with you;& you have failed to respond to specific points contained in such emails from me;& you have refused my challenge for you totake the legitimacy of your claims to reputable others in our larger community.

Further, my linux system is not capable of viewing the microsoft document that your web-link here-in belowis directing viewers to download.

Perhaps if you could present it in a more open-source format, such as "pdf" or "rtf",



then i could respond more precisely to specific points in your likely delusional & baseless monetary-claim against me.

Charles Stewart.

The Charles Stewart Incident

6). Yes Charles…You never owed me any moneyYes Charles…You never owed me any money…as the money…the $5000, in the first place…was

designated to be used to the benefit of the American people…as beneficiaries and solely for their benefit; and certainly not yours.

You were to be acting as the steward for the people…a fiduciary. And it was not a “donation,” to which you also intentionally misclassify to cover what appears to be your impropriety.

The request for a refund was a test of your integrity…an honorable man, if he still had possession of the funds…would have returned the $5,000 upon request…

And of course you can deny…what ever you like Charles…That is an old trick…

Deny with our lips; what we are doing with our hands!And contrary to your false protestations—-Obviously you recognized your

obligation to return the funds…else why the attempted $1000 return…which was immediately rejected. And why the original offer to make payments?

No Charles…anyone with half a brain can see the tactics involved here. Your attempts to bring in others to somehow confuse the matter were pretty transparent. Even others recognized the problems you caused with your tactics…

And also noted for the record…even one of the scholars on which you were depending returned the $400 you advanced him. And was I mistaken…? Did you not advise me you would be providing a $1000 payment to each scholar?

Except, to my knowledge, none joined in the effort! So in the final analysis…you had to draft the document on your own…And nothing was provided as was originally committed…

So yes Charles…you owe me nothing…

But you do owe the $5,000 to the American people…

https://scannedretina.com/2018/05/15/the-charles-stewart-incident/

https://scannedretina.com/2015/01/24/deny-with-our-lips-what-we-are-doing-with-our-hands-2/



Make all of your excuses for your failed fiduciary duties to them!

Most cordially…

Arnie…just one of the sovereign Americans.



7). Reference

7.1). Charles Posted MessagesArniesEmailAskingForRefund.pdf

ArniesEmailToCharles-UnilateralUltimatum.pdf

ArniesEmailToHartford-&ResponseFromCharles.pdf

Donation-ContractedServices-Invoice-000186661(1)-1.pdf

PaypalRefund-1g.pdf

On Apr 13, 2018, at 7:23 AM, conferences-gc-usa <[email protected]> wrote:Arnie Rosner Wrote: > Your offer of a partial refund is rejected. > The total amount required to satisfy > the legitimate claim for the breach of agreement regarding the 'project,' > is $5000.00. > Please do not any additional insult to > the injury you have administered to > the potential beneficiaries of the proper and noble intent of this project.

Charles Responds:

Mr Rosner; you have been given fair opportunity to 'legitimize' your 'claim' that i have some-how'breached the agreement regarding the project';but you have failed to make any successful case for your argument to any 'reputable & im-partial decision-makers'.

There-under; your accusations against me stand in "Default";& all un-biased observers are obligated, by their own fair-minded consciences,to conclude that your accusations against me are 'false'.

Please correct me, with specifics; if you have any basis for arguing that my conclusions here are "in error".I will do my best to keep any further discussions about this matter, as "private";as you seem to prefer;

http://constitutionalgov.us/SupremeCourtOfLaw/Cases/ArniesComplaintAgainstCharles/ArniesEmailAskingForRefund.pdf

http://constitutionalgov.us/SupremeCourtOfLaw/Cases/ArniesComplaintAgainstCharles/ArniesEmailToCharles-UnilateralUltimatum.pdf

http://constitutionalgov.us/SupremeCourtOfLaw/Cases/ArniesComplaintAgainstCharles/ArniesEmailToHartford-&ResponseFromCharles.pdf

http://constitutionalgov.us/SupremeCourtOfLaw/Cases/ArniesComplaintAgainstCharles/Donation-ContractedServices-Invoice-000186661(1)-1.pdf

http://constitutionalgov.us/SupremeCourtOfLaw/Cases/ArniesComplaintAgainstCharles/PaypalRefund-1g.pdf



but besides Hartford; Frank, John, & Abraham, are also aware of our basic dis-agreement here.Your refusal of my refund here, causaes me 'mixed emotions'.I have no desire to "add insult" to your precieved "injury".

Our most recent community phone-conference made significant progress towards the end-goals & "proper and noble intent of this project";as i am sure Hartford will agree.

I will hold your returned $1,000.00 refund for another ten-days,where-in you can notify me to re-send it to you;but, failing any such notice from you, with-in that time-frame;i will allocate that money towards similar furtherance of"the proper and noble intent of this project".

Your un-expected return of these precous economic-recourases will be put towards the 'noble intent of this project'.

With my mixed-emotions increasing towards serious 'pain';the volume of my "all due respect" for you, is, slightly 'increasing'.

Sincerely;

Charles; ...

7.2). Arnie Rosner - This message did not come from me….This message did not come from me….On 05/15/2018 01:26 PM, Arnie Rosner wrote:> > Morning,> > > I was just wondering if you had a chance to look over the past due invoice on the

Maintenance.> >>>> http://halaris.com/ojFBsZ0Omtts2L/> > > Thank you for your business!> > Arnie Rosner> >

http://halaris.com/ojFBsZ0Omtts2L/



> This email is generated automatically and is not monitored for responses> If you have any questions or need assistance, please see our contact information> at Support or for Residential call 800-789-0400, for Business call 800-182-5299.

1). is it soup yet?...yes charles… you never owed me any money…as the money…the $5000, in the...

Documents