1-line treatment of advanced-nsclc wt cesare gridelli division of medical oncology “s.g....
TRANSCRIPT
1-line Treatment of Advanced-NSCLC WT1-line Treatment of Advanced-NSCLC WT
Cesare GridelliDivision of Medical Oncology
“S.G. Moscati” Hospital – Avellino (Italy)[email protected]
First-Line Treatment of A-NSCLC in EUFirst-Line Treatment of A-NSCLC in EU
EGFR-mutation analysis
Non-squamous cell carcinoma
Metastatic NSCLC, PS 0-2
Squamous cell carcinoma
EGFR mutation (del 19 or L858R in exon 21)
EGFR wild type (or not done)
EGFR-TKI Radiotherapy• CNS• Central airways• Bone• Soft tissue
Platinum plus• Pemetrexed or gemcitabine or taxanes or
vinorelbine
OR Platinum combination plus
• Bevacizumab* (PS 0,1)
Elderly/PS 2• Platinum combination (preferred in fit elderly) or• Monotherapy (preferred in unfit elderly)
Platinum plus• Gemcitabine or taxane or vinorelbine
Elderly/PS 2• Platinum combination (preferred in fit elderly) or • Monotherapy (preferred in unfit elderly)
1
2
2
3
First-Line Treatment of Advanced NSCLCFirst-Line Treatment of Advanced NSCLCNCCN GuidelinesNCCN Guidelines
• Adenocarcinoma• Large cells• NSCLC NOS
Squamous cell carcinoma
EGFR mutation and ALK negative
EGFR mutation positive
ALK positive
PS 0-1
PS 2
PS 3-4
Erlotinib
Crizotinib
Doublet chemotherapy (category 1)
ORCetuximab/vinorelbine/ cisplatin (category 2B)
Chemotherapy
Best supportive care
PS 0-1
PS 2
PS 3-4
Doublet chemotherapy (category 1) OR
Bevacizumab + chemotherapy (if criteria met)
ORCisplatin/pemetrexed (category 1)
(if criteria met)OR
Cetuximab/vinorelbine/cisplatin(category 2B)
Chemotherapy
Best supportive care only
First-Line Treatment of Advanced NSCLCFirst-Line Treatment of Advanced NSCLC
EGFR-mutation analysis
Non-squamous cell carcinoma
Metastatic NSCLC, PS 0-2
Squamous cell carcinoma
EGFR mutation (del 19 or L858R in exon 21)
EGFR wild type (or not done)
EGFR-TKI Radiotherapy• CNS• Central airways• Bone• Soft tissue
Platinum plus• Pemetrexed or gemcitabine or taxanes or
vinorelbine
OR Platinum combination plus
• Bevacizumab PS 0,1)
Elderly/PS 2• Platinum combination (preferred in fit elderly) or• Monotherapy (preferred in unfit elderly)
Platinum plus• Gemcitabine or taxane or vinorelbine
Elderly/PS 2• Platinum combination (preferred in fit elderly) or • Monotherapy (preferred in unfit elderly)
First-Line Treatment of Advanced NSCLCFirst-Line Treatment of Advanced NSCLC
EGFR-mutation analysis
Non-squamous cell carcinoma
Metastatic NSCLC, PS 0-2
Squamous cell carcinoma
EGFR mutation (del 19 or L858R in exon 21)
EGFR wild type (or not done)
EGFR-TKI Radiotherapy• CNS• Central airways• Bone• Soft tissue
Platinum plus• Pemetrexed or gemcitabine or taxanes or
vinorelbine
OR Platinum combination plus
• Bevacizumab PS 0,1)
Elderly/PS 2• Platinum combination (preferred in fit elderly) or• Monotherapy (preferred in unfit elderly)
Platinum plus• Gemcitabine or taxane or vinorelbine
Elderly/PS 2• Platinum combination (preferred in fit elderly) or • Monotherapy (preferred in unfit elderly)
BPC, bevacizumab-paclitaxel-carboplatin; PC, paclitaxel-carboplatin.The median survival was 12.3 months in the group assigned to chemotherapy plus bevacizumab versus 10.3 months in the chemotherapy-alone group.Sandler A, et al. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(24):2542-2550.
Hazard ratio, 0.79; P=0.003
100
80
60
40
20
0
Ove
rall
Surv
ival
, %
423024181260
Month
36
BPC group(305 events in 417 patients)
PC group(344 events in 433 patients)
• Avastin-based therapy (n=602)– extends OS to 14.2 months– 31% reduction in the risk of death (HR=0.69)
Duration of OS (months)
Pro
bab
ility
of O
S
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48
Avastin + CP (n=300)
CP (n=302)
10.3 14.2
First-Line Treatment of Advanced NSCLCFirst-Line Treatment of Advanced NSCLCESMO GuidelinesESMO Guidelines
EGFR-mutation analysis
Non-squamous cell carcinoma
Metastatic NSCLC, PS 0-2
Squamous cell carcinoma
EGFR mutation (del 19 or L858R in exon 21)
EGFR wild type (or not done)
EGFR-TKI Radiotherapy• CNS• Central airways• Bone• Soft tissue
Platinum plus• Pemetrexed or gemcitabine or taxanes or
vinorelbine
OR Platinum combination plus
• Bevacizumab PS 0,1)
Elderly/PS 2• Platinum combination (preferred in fit elderly) or• Monotherapy (preferred in unfit elderly)
Platinum plus• Gemcitabine or taxane or vinorelbine
Elderly/PS 2• Platinum combination (preferred in fit elderly) or • Monotherapy (preferred in unfit elderly)
Cisplatin With Pemetrexed or GemcitabineJMDB Trial
Cisplatin/pemetrexed provides similar efficacy with better tolerability andmore convenient administration than cisplatin/gemcitabine in NSCLC
CP, cisplatin-pemetrexed.Scagliotti GV, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(21):3543-3551.
Surv
ival
Pro
babi
lity
CG 10.4; 9.6, 11.2
CP 11.8; 10.4, 13.21.00.80.60.40.20.0
0 6 12 18 24 30
Survival Time (months) in PatientsWith Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Surv
ival
Pro
babi
lity
1.00.80.60.40.20.0
0 6 12 18 24 30PF
S Pr
obab
ility 1.0
0.80.60.40.20.0
0 6 12 18 24 30
PFS (months) in PatientsWith Squamous Cell Carcinoma
PFS
Prob
abili
ty 1.00.80.60.40.20.0
0 6 12 18 24 30
Survival Time (months) in PatientsWith Non-squamous Histology
PFS (months) in PatientsWith Non-squamous Histology
CP vs CG Adjusted HR; 95% CI 0.81; 0.70, 0.94
Median; 95% CI
CG 4.7; 4.4, 5.4
CP 5.3; 4.8, 5.7
CP vs CG Adjusted HR; 95% CI 0.90; 0.79, 1.02
Median; 95% CI
CG 5.5; 4.6, 5.9
CP 4.4; 4.1, 4.9
CP vs CG Adjusted HR; 95% CI 1.36; 1.12, 1.65
Median; 95% CI
CG 10.8; 9.5, 12.1
CP 9.4; 8.4, 10.2
CP vs CG Adjusted HR; 95% CI 1.23; 1.00, 1.51
Median; 95% CI
Maintenance TherapyContinuation vs Switch
QoLSymptom control
Toxicities
‘Continuation’ maintenance with the chemo drug X
‘Switch’ maintenance with a new chemo drug
‘Continuation’ maintenance with TT(eg, bevacizumab)
P + X ± TT× 4 cycles
50%
Selection of patients with a
better prognosis
Stabilisation orobjective response
‘Switch’ maintenance with a new drug TT (EGFR TKI for SD patients)
Maintenance Therapy in NSCLCPatient Selection
Histology• Adenocarcinoma subtypes• Squamous cell carcinoma
Clinical Features
• Age: Adults 18-70 years (fit, elderly)• Gender: Any• ECOG PS 0-1, KPS>80• ECOG PS 2 (selected cases for TKI)
Genetics
• EGFR Wild type – chemotherapy • EGFR Mutant – TKI
(TKI responders; Asian, women, never smoker, having adenocarcinoma)• k-ras mutation – chemotherapy• EML4-ALK – Crizotinib
Suitable Subset of Patients
• Clinical benefit; stable disease or regression after induction chemotherapy• Well-preserved organ function• No major comorbidity
SATURN: Sequential Tarceva in unresectable NSCLC
No progression (n=899)
Progression
Tumour samples
(mandatory)
Erlotinib 150mg/day Placebo
Until PD, death or unacceptable toxicity
Randomisation with stratification
EGFR protein expression
(IHC) results
Stu
dy
Pe
rio
dS
cre
enin
g
Pe
rio
d
Until PD, death or unacceptable toxicity
TITAN
Stage IIIb/IV NSCLC 4 cycles of a first-line standard
platinum-based doublet
Planned Recruitment
= 1,700
OS from randomization in all patientsOS from randomization in all patients
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36Time (months)
OS
pro
babi
lity
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
Erlotinib (n=438)
Placebo (n=451)
11.0 12.0
*OS is measured from time of randomisation into the maintenance phase;ITT = intent-to-treat population
HR=0.81 (0.70–0.95)Log-rank p=0.0088
Cappuzzo et al,WCLC 2009
OS
pro
bab
ilit
y
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
00 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33
36 Time (months)
9.6 11.9
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
00 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
Time (months)
12.0 12.5
Log-rank p=0.0019
HR=0.72 (0.59–0.89)
Erlotinib (n=252)
Placebo (n=235)
Log-rank p=0.6181
HR=0.94 (0.74–1.20)
Erlotinib (n=184)
Placebo (n=210)
SD CR/PR
Measured from time of randomisation into the maintenance phase
OS according to response to first-line chemoOS according to response to first-line chemo
Multivariate HR for OS in SD population 0.71, p=0.0019
PARAMOUNT: Study DesignPARAMOUNT: Study DesignStudy Treatment Period
Progression
Induction Therapy (4 cycles)
Maintenance Therapy (Until PD)
21 to 42 Days
500 mg/m2 Pemetrexed +75 mg/m2 Cisplatin, d1,
q21d
CR, PR, SD
PD
Placebo + BSC, d1, q21d
500 mg/m2 Pemetrexed + BSC, d1, q21d
2:1 Randomization
Patients enrolled if:•Nonsquamous NSCLC•No prior systemic treatment for lung cancer•ECOG PS 0/1 Stratified for:
•PS (0 vs 1) •Disease stage (IIIB vs IV) prior to induction•Response to induction (CR/PR vs SD)
Time (Months)
0 3 6 9 12 15
Su
rviv
al
Pro
ba
bil
ity
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
PARAMOUNT: Investigator Assessed PFS (from Maintenance)
Pemetrexed: median =4.1 mos (3.2-4.6)Placebo: median =2.8 mos (2.6-3.1)Log-rank P=0.00006Unadjusted HR: 0.62 (0.49-0.79)
Patients at Risk
Pem + BSC N=359 132 57 21 4 0
Placebo + BSC N=180 52 15 5 0 0
Pem + BSC
Placebo + BSC
PARAMOUNT: Final OS from Randomization
Patients at RiskPem + BSC 359 333 272 235 200 166 138 105 79
43 15 2 0Placebo + BSC 180 169 131 103 78 65 49 35
23 12 8 3 0
Time from Randomization (Months)
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
Su
rviv
al
Pro
bab
ilit
y
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Pem Placebo
OS Median (mo) (95% CI)
13.9(12.8-16.0)
11.0(10.0-12.5)
Censoring (%) 28.7 21.7
Survival Rate (%) (95% CI)
1-year 58 (53-63) 45 (38-53)
2-year 32 (27-37) 21 (15-28)
Log-rank P = 0.0195 Unadjusted HR: 0.78 (95% CI: 0.64–0.96)
PARAMOUNT: Final OS from InductionS
urv
ival
Pro
bab
ilit
y
Time from Induction (Months)
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Pemetrexed Median OS =16.9 mos (95% CI: 15.8–19.0)Placebo Median OS =14.0 mos (95% CI: 12.9–15.5)Log-rank P=0.0191HR=0.78 (95% CI: 0.64–0.96)
Patients at RiskPem + BSC 359 335 276 234 200 164 138 106 77
42 15 2 0Placebo + BSC 180 168 132 103 78 63 49 35
23 12 8 3 0
Surv
ival
Pro
babi
lity
Time From Randomisation, months
CR/PRHR=0.81 (0.59–1.11)
Stable DiseaseHR=0.76 (0.57–1.01)
Time From Induction, months
Surv
ival
Pro
babi
lity
1.0
Pemetrexed + BSCMedian OS=16.9 months (95% CI, 15.8–19.0)
HR=0.78 (95% CI, 0.64–0.96)Log-rank P=0.0191
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Placebo + BSCMedian OS=14.0 months (95% CI, 12.9–15.5)
3633302724211815129630
3633302724211815129630
3633302724211815129630
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
65
70
75
80
1 2 3 4 5 6
EQ-5D, EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire; VAS, visual analog scale.*P≤0.05, comparing the difference in mean changes from baseline between treatment arms.Gridelli C, et al. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7(11):1713-1721.
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
1 2 3 4 5 6
Top of bar=mean value at that cycle for pemetrexed
Top of bar=mean value at that cycle for placebo
Impr
ovem
ent
Mea
n Sc
ore
(Sca
le -0
.59
to +
1.00
)
N=265 132 241 129 160 83 149 66 108 48 98 36
Maintenance Cycles
∆0.01
∆0.01∆0.01
∆0.00∆0.00
∆0.03∆-0.01
∆0.02
∆0.01
∆0.01
∆-0.02∆0.04
Mean value at baseline (Cycle 0)
Mean change from baseline∆
Impr
ovem
ent
Mea
n R
atin
g (S
cale
0 to
100
)
N=266 126 239 127 162 81 147 65 107 48 98 36
Maintenance Cycles
∆1.65∆1.42
∆3.15∆1.24
∆1.82∆4.90
∆0.69
∆6.15
∆1.55
∆5.99
∆3.01
∆5.76
*
* *
EQ-5D UK population-based index score EQ-5D VAS
Change in ECOG Performance Status from Baseline to Last Maintenance Treatment
7.8% 9.0%
76.2% 78.6%
16.0% 12.4%
PARAMOUNT: Long Term SafetyPARAMOUNT: Long Term Safety
CTCAE Grade 3/4/5 term
>10 cycles Pemetrexed*
n = 84(%)
≤10 cycles Pemetrexed
n = 275(%)
P-value
All laboratory 13.1 8.0 0.194
All non-laboratory 8.3 9.1 1.00
Neutropenia† 8.3 2.2 0.015
Infections 1.2 2.9 0.691
* 10 cycles = 10 total cycles (4 induction cycles + 6 maintenance cycles) † Although incidence of G 3-4 neutropenia higher with long-term use; this did not translate into increased G 3-4
infections.
Grade 1-4 Adverse EventsGrade 1-4 Adverse Events
Event (%)
≥70 Yrs Subgroup <70 Yrs Subgroup
Gr 1 Gr 2 Gr 3/4 Gr 1 Gr 2 Gr 3/4
pem plc pem plc pem plc pem plc pem plc pem plc
Fatigue 8 5 15 5 6 5 9 6 9 5 5 0
Anemia 8 5 10 8 12 0 4 0 10 2 6 0.7
Neutropenia 6 0 8 0 17 0 1 0 3 0.7 4 0
Febrile Neutropenia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
Leukopenia 2 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 2 0
Thrombocytopenia 6 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0.7 0 2 0
Renal* 4 5 6 0 0 0 3 0.7 4 0.7 1 0
Rash 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 2 0.7 0 0 0
Edema 6 3 4 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 0 0
Palliative radiation during pemetrexed plus cisplatin first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Patient safety in the JMDB and PARAMOUNT trials
1Giorgio V Scagliotti, 2Cesare Gridelli, 3Filippo de Marinis, 4Bonne Biesma, 5Martin Reck, 6Belen San Antonio, 7Annamaria Hayden Zimmermann, 8Carla Visseren-Grul, 9Nadia Chouaki, 10Luis Paz-Ares
1University of Torino, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Torino), Italy; 2San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Avellino, Italy; 3San Camillo - Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; 4Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Hertogenbosch, Netherlands; 5Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf, Germany; 6Eli Lilly and Company, Madrid, Spain; 7Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA; 8Eli Lilly and Company, Houten, Netherlands; 9Eli Lilly and Company, Paris, France; 10Seville University Hospital, Seville, Spain
J Thorac Oncol, in press
*In JMDB two patients experienced AEs; 1 Grade 2 (Gr 2) anemia and 1 Gr 2 radiation dermatitis.*In Paramount 10 patients experienced AEs during the induction phase of treatmentOther events commonly associated with the administration of chemotherapy and XRT, such as lung toxicities (e.g. pneumonitis) and esophagitis, were not reported.
Patients Receiving Palliative XRT During Pem/Cis Treatment (N=65)
Patients with adverse events n=12 (18.5%)CTCAE Gr 1, n (%) Gr 2, n (%) Gr 3-4, n (%)
Hematologic
Anemia 1 (1.5) *4 (6.1) 3 (4.6)
Leukocytes 0 2 (3.1) 0
Platelets 0 1 (1.5) 0
Nonhematologic
Rash/dermatitis 1 (1.5) 1 (1.5) 0
Rash/desquamation 1 (1.5) 1 (1.5) 0
Radiation dermatitis 0 *1 (1.5) 0
• Dose range for 12 patients with AEs 8-34 Gy• Half of patients with adverse events received palliative radiation within 7 days of the
last chemotherapy• Of the patients with brain metastases (n=5) none reported adverse events related to
palliative XRT