1 measurement of the single transverse- spin asymmetry of forward neutrons in p-p collisions at...

36
1 Measurement of the single transv erse-spin asymmetry of forward n eutrons in p-p collisions at RHI C-PHENIX Manabu Togawa for the PHENIX collaboration from Kyoto University

Upload: emmeline-osborne

Post on 17-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

Measurement of the single transverse-spin asymmetry of forward neutrons in p-p

collisions at RHIC-PHENIX

Manabu Togawa

for the PHENIX collaboration

from Kyoto University

2

Outline

• Motivation

• PHENIX neutron measurement– Setup– Neutron asymmetry at sqrt(s)=200GeV

• Simulation study• Estimation of asymmetry error at 2005 RUN

– First measurement of neutron asymmetry at sqrt(s)=410GeV

• Summary

3

Motivation• In the forward neutron production, there are some inte

resting behaviors.– In ISR experiment, pp sqrt(s)=30~63GeV, cross section of forward

neutron production at low pT was measured to be larger than at high pT. [left pict.]

– In the RHIC IP12 experiment, pp sqrt(s)=200GeV. We found large single transverse-spin asymmetry AN (-10%) [right pict.]

– PHENIX data can shed new light to understand the production mechanism.

<AN>=-0.1090.0072

Kinematics ±2.8mrad

Forward region

xFNucl. Phys. B109 (1976) 347-356

4

• Does Feynman scaling hold when going to RHIC energy?

• From the ISR result, C.S. are well scaling by xF at 30<sqrt(s)<63 GeV..

• Forward neutron C.S. has peak structure and it is well described by pion exchange model.

• What is the mechanism of neutron asymmetry ?– pion exchange model

• Asymmetry can be appeared by interference of spin flip amplitude with other’s one.

– Twist-3 model• It can explain asymmetries of forwar

d pion (E704).• Based on pQCD, does it work in suc

h forward kinematics?

Eur.Phys.J.A7:109-119,2000

xF

xF dependencesqrt(s) >= 200GeV - cross section - asymmetry

pT dependencesqrt(s) >= 200GeV - asymmetry

5

Forward neutron measurement at PHENIX

~ 1800cm

10cm±2.8mrad

PHENIX Collision Point

Dx magnetblue beam yellow beam

LRRL

LRRLN

NNNN

NNNN

PA

1

AN ~1

P

1

N total

To calculate asymmetry, use square root formula.

Typical energy distribution

GeV

* Energy calibration was done by CuCu data. (1 neutron peak)

scintillator

100GeV

sqrt(s)=200GeV

At 2005 RUN, sqrt(s) = 200, 410GeV polarized proton beams.

Trigger set sqrt(s)=200 sqrt(s)=410

NORTH or SOUTH 12M 11M

(NORTH or SOUTH) & Minbias

90M 72M

NORTH & SOUTH 30M 20M

GeV

6

ZDC (Zero Degree Calorimeter) and SMD (Shower Max Detector)

beam

beam

~ 1800cm

10cm±2.8mrad

PHENIX Collision Point

Dx magnetblue beam yellow beam

150

unit:mm

100

Hadronshower

5

Hadron Calorimeter

(sampling by Tungsten and fiber plates.)

5.1λT 149X0 (3 ZDCs)Energy resolution ~20% @ 100GeV

Position resolution ~1cm @ 50GeV (sim).

7

Neutron asymmetry at PHENIX from RUN5 data (200GeV)

LRRL

LRRLraw

NNNN

NNNNA

Using square root formula.

Detector

Forward

Raw

as

ymm

etry

Backward

Raw

as

ymm

etry

8

Simulation study• ZDC and SMD have not been measured energy and

position resolution less than 100GeV.– In the test experiment, energy resolution was measured 100

and 160GeV by proton beam.

• It is necessary to study the response by simulation.– Asymmetry is smeared by position resolution

GeV GeV

~ 21% ~ 20%

Real data (1 neutron @ CuCu data)

Simulation out (neutron 100GeV input)

Simulation is based on geant3.

9

Estimation of asymmetry error - energy dependence -

LRRL

LRRLraw

NNNN

NNNNA

)200(@100~

GeVs

energyxF

• A has energy dependence ?– Flat at IP12 experiment.– In this forward region,

rawN

total

raw AP

AN

A11

~

simulation studyError reach ~ 10-3 order

Asymmetry definition

10

Estimation of asymmetry error - pT dependence -

222

22

*ryx

yxEpT

simulation studyError reach ~ 10-3 order

pT distribution at sqrt(s) = 200GeV

pT(GeV)

r

(0,0)

(x,y)

n

detector

Max x and y : ~5 cm r ~ 1800 cm

0.1GeV

11

Asymmetry at 410GeV

Forward

Raw

as

ymm

etry

Backward

Raw

as

ymm

etry

First measurement

• Asymmetry remains in higher energy region.– pT is larger compared with 200GeV.– Local polarimeter needs this asymmetry until 500GeV in RHI

C spin program. it is expected to remain at 500GeV !

pT(GeV)

Analysis cut effect is uncorrected.

12

Summary• We took forward neutron data at sqrt(s)=200 an

d 410 GeV in 2005 RUN at RHIC-PHENIX.• The expected asymmetry error at 2005 RUN w

ere estimated.– Asymmetry will be obtained with 10-3 accuracy. – Energy and pT resolution were estimated by simulati

on.

• Neutron asymmetry at sqrt(s)=410GeV was measured for the first time.– It remains in such high energy.– It is expected that asymmetry will remain when go t

o sqrt(s) = 500GeV.

13

Back up

14

How to measure how longitudinal?

AL 1

P

AN 1

P L R

L R

Parity violation : allow by weak decay unconvincing

Basic idea is from FNAL704 (AN of forward pion)

The E704 experiment at Fermilab

pp XSqrt(s)=19.4GeVpT=0.2~2.0GeV/c

15

Electro Magnetic Cal-based System

-performance-

Calibrated with the beam experiment at SLAC.

E/E ~ 10/sqrt(E) %Noise ~ 1.4GeVx = y ~ 0.15cm for x = y ~ 0.5cm for N

Particle ID logic

16

EMCal based results

Succeed in 0 reconstructionM/M ~ 9.3%

Average beam pol. ~ 11%Calculate asymmetry using sqrt root formula.

17

Hadron Cal-basedsystem (1 ZDC)

-performance-Energy is calibrated by using cosmic-ray data and simulation. Flat response E>20GeV

E/E ~ 40 to 50 % at E>20GeVx ~ 3 to 4cm(post shower)

Particle ID logic

18

Shower MAX Detector

For x-pos : 7For y-pos : 8

150

Unit : mm

• For measuring neutron position, SMD (Shower Max Detector) was installed btw ZDC1 and ZDC2. – Arrays of plastic scintillators – Obtain the position by calculating the center of gravity of

shower generating in first ZDC.– Position resolution ~1cm @ 50GeV neutron (simulation

study).

1 ZDC

SMD

100

5

Hadronshower

19

Looking neutron peak

After subtract pedestals and apply calibration constant. To match 1 neutron peak is 100. (should be 100 GeV)

SOUTH NORTH

20

ZDC shape

GeV

BLUE : SOUTHRED : NORTH

Very agree both shape after calibration.

21

Gluon polarization• To understand the spin structure in the nucleon•     -> 1/2(proton) = 1/2DS(quark) + DG + L

ALL ( ) ( )

( ) ( )

ALL ~g(x1)

g(x1)

ei2

i

qi(x2)

ei2

i

qi(x2)ˆ a LL (qg q)

γ

For ex. gq -> qγ

Measured in DIS Calculated by pQCD

The experiment of longitudinal polarized proton collide had been started from this year by introducing the spin rotator.

22

Square root furmula

LRRL

LRRLN

NNNN

NNNN

PA

1

AN ~1

P

1

N total

where : N total N R N R N L N L

23

• Calculate for each bunch.• As a fit function,

Fit for all bunch as D,AB,AY

variables. (55 bunch mode at RUN3)

ALR (i) NL (i) NR (i)

NL (i) NR (i)

ALR D AB PB AY PY

1 DAB PB DAY PY

NL(R) : Number of Left(Right) D : detector asymmetryAB : BLUE asymmetryAY : YELLOW asymmetryPB : BLUE polarizationPY : YELLOWpolarization

Measured by CNI polarimeter

Our measurement

Bunch Fittinig

Pol derection

24

Neutron energy (sim)neutron put to center

Input energy

Input energy

Ou

tput

ene

rgy

En

ergy

reso

lution

25

Xpos

Ypos

Neutron energy

Neutron energy* Position resolution is defined as RMS.

Input line

Position resolution (sim)neutron put to center

26

Neutron energy (sim)neutron put to edge

* Resolution is defined as RMS/Energy

27

Asymmetry as function of ZDC2 cut

beam

Gamma stop at ZDC1.Neutron hadron shower goes to ZDC2.

28

Reducing asymmetry valueby energy and position smearing

Input : neutron with flat energy distribution, 10 ~ 100GeV input positions are flat for x and y.

29

EMCal based results

Calibrated for the photon only.

<AN>=-0.1090.0072

<AN>=-0.1080.0087Detector

Hadron Cal based results

<AN>=-0.1090.0072

AN 1

P L R

L R

30

As a local polarimeter system

PHOBOS BRAHMS

STARPHENIX

Spin Rotators

Siberian Snakes

RHIC ( Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider )CNI polarimeter

• One of the main program of RHIC experiment is that the determination of the polarized parton distribution function.– It needs longitudinally polarized proton-proton collision.

• Polarimeter at the collision point is necessary to confirm “beam is longitudinal”. (Local polarimeter)

31

RUN5(2005) result.

AAT

AL

2

1cos

A

A

A

A TL

<(RawAsymmetry)/(pol.)/A>

BLUE 9.5 ± 2.2 (%)

YELLOW 15.5 ± 2.4 (%)

Through the RUN5, longitudinal component : <pL/p> BLUE = 99.54 ± 0.12 ± 0.03 (%)<pL/p> YELL = 98.78 ± 0.24 ± 0.06 (%)

32

Fill by fill analysisby sqrt formula

33

Bunch shuffling : sqrt formula (sim with 1% asymmetry)

Forward LR Forward UD

Backward LR Backward UD

34

Bunch shuffling : sqrt formula (forward region)

BLUE LR BLUE UD

YELLOW LR YELLOW UD

35

Bunch shuffling : sqrt formula (backward region)

BLUE LR BLUE UD

YELLOW LR YELLOW UD

36