1 n ational a gricultural s tatistics s ervice washington, d.c. practical considerations in...

48
1 National Agricultural Statistics Service Washington, D.C. Practical Considerations in Selecting Statistical Disclosure Methodology for Tabular Data BTS Confidentiality Seminar Series, March 2003

Upload: trevor-elliott

Post on 27-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

Practical Considerations in

Selecting Statistical Disclosure

Methodology for Tabular DataBTS Confidentiality Seminar Series, March 2003

2

Examples in the Presentation are Based on Actual

Occurrences

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

3

Data have been changed to protect

the innocent

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

4

Goals:

•Discuss Decision Factors•Discuss Alternatives•Present Illustrations•Provide a Perspective for

Future Decisions

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

5

DECISION FACTORS - 1

What is your data structure?

Household, establishment, opinion, census data, sample results, etc…

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

6

DECISION FACTORS - 2

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

What are your population characteristics?

Limited variation, extremely clustered, highly skewed,

etc…

7

DECISION FACTORS - 3

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

Who are your customers?• Casual readers• In-depth analysts• People (companies)

from the data population• Etc…

8

DECISION FACTORS - 4

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

What decisions will be made by your customers?•Social Research Studies•Economic Investment Decisions•Implementation of Government Programs

•Etc…

9

BASIC SUPPRESSION APPROACHES

•(n, p) Rules•(p, k) Rules•(n, p, t) Rules

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

10

Should You Publish Your Suppression Rule?

•Conventional wisdom says NO!

•It might be essential for certain situations

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

11

BASIC NASS APPROACHES

•(p, k) Rule for Ag Census •(n, p) Rule for Periodic

Surveys•Special Techniques

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

12

SPECIAL TECHNIQUES

• Signed Release Agreements (Waivers)

• Geographic Combinations• Size Group Combinations• Reclassification of Categories

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

13

WAIVERS

• Large Operations• Permission to Publish is Requested• Must Agree in Writing• Updated Annually

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

14

Waiver ExampleHypothetical Pecan Production Example 1/

State Production – 1,000lbs

AL 15,000

GA 80,000

LA 18,000

NM 35,000

TX 30,000

All Other 2/ 31,850

US 209,850

1/ Assumes One person controls all Arizona Production2/ Includes AZ, AR, CA, FL, KS, MS, NC, OK, SC

15

Waiver ExamplePecan Production Example, Actual Results

State 2000 Production/1,000lbs

AL 15,000

AZ 14,500

AR 900

CA 3,400

FL 3,300

GA 80,000

KS 550

LA 18,000

MS 3,500

NM 35,000

NC 1,600

OK 2,500

SC 1,600

TX 30,000

US 209,850

16

Geographic Combinations

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

Hypothetical Olive Acreage

States Growers Acres

CA 1,363 37,714

FL 2 2

U.S. Total 1,365 37,716

Traditional Approach

CA 1,363 (D)

FL 2 (D)

U.S. Total 1,365 (D)

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual farms.

17

Geographic Combinations

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

Handling hypothetical Olive data

Situation by moving Florida Olives to “Other”

Olive Acreage

States Growers Acres

CA 1363 37,714

U.S. Total 1363 37,714

18

Size Group Example

Percent of Farms, by Economic Sales Class, U.S. 2001

Economic Sales Class Percent of Total Farms

$1,000 - $2,499 25.3

$2,500 - $4,999 15.3

$5,000 - $9,999 13.4

$10,000 - $24,999 12.5

$25,000 - $49,999 8.7

$50,000 - $99,999 8.6

$100,000 - $249,999 8.9

$250,000 - $499,999 4.1

$500,000 - $999,999 2.0

$1,000,000+ 1.2

Total 100.0

19

Size Group ExampleNumber of Farms: Economic Sales Class by State and Region,

2001

State and Region

Economic Sales Class

$1,000 - $9,999 $10,000 - $99,999 $100,000 & Over

Number Number Number

Northeast

CT 2,450

ME 4,200

MA 3,200

NH 2,100

NJ 6,400

NY 17,800 11,000 8,700

PA 32,800 16,500 9,700

RI 350

VT 3,500

Other States 10,600 3,800

Total 72,800 38,100 22,200

20

Reclassification Example

Hypothetical Potato Variety Data, 1 State

Fall Potatoes: Percent of Major Varieties Planted,

State and Varieties Percent of Planted Acres

R Burbank 71.0

Ranger R 12.0

R Norkotah 7.5

Shepody 3.4

Silverton R 2.4

De Wolf 1.0

Other 2.7

TOTAL 100.0

However, assume that deWolf is a new variety planted only on one large farms

21

Reclassification Example

Actual Potato Variety Data, 1 State

Fall Potatoes: Percent of Major Varieties Planted,

State and Varieties Percent of Planted Acres

R Burbank 71.0

Ranger R 12.0

R Norkotah 7.5

Shepody 3.4

Silverton R 2.4

Other 3.7

TOTAL 100.0

22

CASE STUDY

Agricultural Marketing Service implementation of mandatory price

reporting law illustrates basic decision factor principles.

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

23

OUTLINE

• Define the problem• Explain the approach• Describe the solution• Present some results

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

24

Large meat packers must report details of

all purchase transactions.

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

25

Data must be reported by fixed times each day.

ANDSummaries published

an hour later.

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

26

AMS must protect confidentiality in

issuing summaries.

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

27

90% of slaughteris in 114 plants,

owned by 65 companies.

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

28

4 Companies:

•80% of fed cattle•80% of fed lambs•55% of all hogs

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

29

AMS adopted a 3/60 standard for each

data cell.

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

30

At least three companies and no

company exceeding 60%.

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

31

AMS never identified how many companies were in an aggregate.

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

32

AMS did not distinguish

blank cells from suppressed cells.

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

33

Many (24 %) daily reports were

suppressed plus many cells in released

reports.

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

34

Some observers calculated 90% suppression.

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

35

When in Doubt – Examine the Data!

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

36

Plant

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A X X X X X X X

B X

C X X X X X X X X X X X

D X X X X X X X

E X X X

F X X X X X X X X X X X

G X X X X X X X

H X X X X X X X X X X X

I X

SEQUENCE DAY

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

37

When are proprietary data

not unique?

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

38

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

A new 3/70/20 confidentiality

standard based on 60-days of data.

39

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

At least 3 companies

operated 50% of the time.

40

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

No company had more than 70 percent of the

volume.

41

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

No company would be exposed more than 20% of the

time.

42

Nearly all cattle daily reports and all cells

now released.

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

43

EXAMPLE TALLY Cattle Open Market, One Region, Daily

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

3 or more

68%

Concen. 47%

Exposure

2%

44

EXAMPLE TALLYCattle Forward Contracts, National, Daily

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

3 or more 41%

Concen. 51%

Exposure 6%

45

Modification 1

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

Cattle forward contracts are now published weekly

46

Modification 2

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

All swine packer sales alternatives weighted together

daily.

47

Modification 3

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.

Lamb purchases accumulated until

the 3/70/20 is reached.

48

Author Contact Information

• Rich Allen• Deputy Administrator, NASS• Room 5905 South Building• 1400 Independence Ave., S.W.• Washington, D.C. 20250-2001• 202-690-8141 Fax 202-690-1311• [email protected]

National Agricultural Statistics ServiceWashington, D.C.