1 results from the grape model atsushi kurosawa research and development division, the institute of...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 1 Results from the GRAPE Model Atsushi KUROSAWA Research and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi,](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649ce65503460f949b498c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Results from the GRAPE Model
Atsushi KUROSAWAResearch and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE)Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi, Minato, Tokyo 105-0003 JAPAN
Phone (+81) 3-3508-8894 / Fax (+81) 3-3501-1735 E-mail : [email protected]
Expert Meeting on Assessment of Contributions to Climate ChangeUK Met Office, Bracknell UK
September 25-27, 2002
The views are solely those of the individual author and do not represent organizational view of the Institute of Applied Energy
![Page 2: 1 Results from the GRAPE Model Atsushi KUROSAWA Research and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi,](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649ce65503460f949b498c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Outline [1] GRAPE MODEL AND CLIMATE MODULE
[2] PHASE 2 RESULTS GLOBAL SCALE ASSESSMENT AND SENSITIVITY RUNS
[3] SUMMARY
![Page 3: 1 Results from the GRAPE Model Atsushi KUROSAWA Research and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi,](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649ce65503460f949b498c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
ENERGY
CLIMATE
IMPACT LAND USE
ECONOMY
CO2,CH4,N2O
(Fossil
Fuel)
Energy CostEnergy Trade
Carbon Trade
Biom
ass Energy
Atm
ospheric
Tem
perature
Lan
duse
Rel
ated
Cos
t
Fo
od T
rade
Carbon(Deforestation)
CH4(Livestock,Rice)
N2O(Fertilizer),etc
[1] GRAPE MODEL AND CLIMATE MODULE
![Page 4: 1 Results from the GRAPE Model Atsushi KUROSAWA Research and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi,](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649ce65503460f949b498c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4CLIMATE CHANGE
CO2
Em.
Ocean
CH4
Em.
N2OConc.
CH4
Conc.
CO2
Conc.Atmosphere
N2OEm.
Rice Field
Other GHGsEm.
Forest
Fos.FuelConsumption
ChemicalIndustry
FertilizedSoil
Livestock
Fos. Fuel Production
Concentration→ Rad. Forc.
Emissions
Rad.Forcing
TemperatureSources
![Page 5: 1 Results from the GRAPE Model Atsushi KUROSAWA Research and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi,](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649ce65503460f949b498c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
[2] PHASE 2 RESULTS GLOBAL SCALE ASSESSMENT AND SENSITIVITY RUNS # Formulation Emissions to Concentrations CO2 - Four Box model CH4,N2O – One Box model Concentrations to Rad. Forcings IPCC WGI TAR Rad. Forcings to Temp. Change & SLR Two Box model # Evaluation Period 10 year step
![Page 6: 1 Results from the GRAPE Model Atsushi KUROSAWA Research and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi,](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649ce65503460f949b498c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
# Sensitivity Run Past Emissions : EDGAR Future Emissions : IPCC SRES A2 Marker
Start End Case 1 1890 2000 - default Case 2 1990 2100 Case 3 1890 2100
![Page 7: 1 Results from the GRAPE Model Atsushi KUROSAWA Research and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi,](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649ce65503460f949b498c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
# Regional Contibution Assessment Example : Region A Contribution >>> Nature + Region A Emission
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
(Time)
(Em
issi
ons) Human Region D
Human Region CHuman Region BHuman Region ANature
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
(Time)
(Em
issi
ons) Human Region D
Human Region CHuman Region BHuman Region ANature
Start End
Definition of Contribution = (change of param. in regional calculation) / (change of param. in global calculation)
![Page 8: 1 Results from the GRAPE Model Atsushi KUROSAWA Research and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi,](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649ce65503460f949b498c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
# Cumulative Emissions
Relative Contribution to Cumulative CO2 Emissions
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
case 1 case 2 case 3
International Bunker
ALM
ASIA
REF
OECD90
![Page 9: 1 Results from the GRAPE Model Atsushi KUROSAWA Research and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi,](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649ce65503460f949b498c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Relative Contribution to CO2 Concentration
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
case 1 case2 case3
ALM
ASIA
REF
OECD90
# Concentrations
CO2 Concenrtation (case1)
250
300
350
400
1890
1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
(ppm)
OECD90
REF
ASIA
ALM
WORLD
CO2 Concentration (case2)
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2060
2070
2080
2090
2100
(ppm)
OECD90
REF
ASIA
ALM
WORLD
CO2 Concentration (case3)
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
1890
1920
1950
1980
2010
2040
2070
2100
(ppm)
OECD90
REF
ASIA
ALM
WORLD
![Page 10: 1 Results from the GRAPE Model Atsushi KUROSAWA Research and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi,](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649ce65503460f949b498c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Relative Contribution to Radiative Forcing
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
case 1 case2 case3
ALM
ASIA
REF
OECD90
# Radiative Forcing
Radiative Forcing (case1)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
1890
1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
(W/m2)
OECD90
REF
ASIA
ALM
WORLD
Radiative Forcing (case2)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2060
2070
2080
2090
2100
(W/m2)
OECD90
REF
ASIA
ALM
WORLD
Radiative Forcing (case3)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1890
1920
1950
1980
2010
2040
2070
2100
(W/m2)
OECD90
REF
ASIA
ALM
WORLD
![Page 11: 1 Results from the GRAPE Model Atsushi KUROSAWA Research and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi,](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649ce65503460f949b498c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
# Temperature Change
Relative Contribution to Global-Average Temperature Change
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
case 1 case2 case3
ALM
ASIA
REF
OECD90
Temparature Change (case1)
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1890
1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
(deg C)
OECD90
REF
ASIA
ALM
WORLD
Temparature Change (case2)
0
1
2
3
4
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2060
2070
2080
2090
2100
(deg C)
OECD90
REF
ASIA
ALM
WORLD
Temparature Change (case3)
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
1890
1920
1950
1980
2010
2040
2070
2100
(deg C)
OECD90
REF
ASIA
ALM
WORLD
![Page 12: 1 Results from the GRAPE Model Atsushi KUROSAWA Research and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi,](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649ce65503460f949b498c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
# Sea Level Rise
Relative Contribution to Sea Level Rise (by Thermal Expansion)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
case 1 case2 case3
ALM
ASIA
REF
OECD90
Sea Level Rise (Thermal Expansion, case1)
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
1890
1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
(m)
OECD90
REF
ASIA
ALM
WORLD
Sea Level Rise (Thermal Expansion, case2)
-0.005
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1890
1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
(m)
OECD90
REF
ASIA
ALM
WORLD
Sea Level Rise (Thermal Expansion, case3)
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
1890
1920
1950
1980
2010
2040
2070
2100
(m)
OECD90
REF
ASIA
ALM
WORLD
![Page 13: 1 Results from the GRAPE Model Atsushi KUROSAWA Research and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi,](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649ce65503460f949b498c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
# Strength of Non-Linearity -- Regional sum is not equal to 100%.Parameter Period (Reg.Sum) – (Global)
CO2 Conc. Past (case 1) -15%Future (case 2) -31%Past+Future (case 3) -3%
Rad Forcing Past -14%Future -37%Past+Future 25%
Temp Past 5%Future -31%Past+Future 25%
SLR Past 39% Future 31%
Past+Future 30%
![Page 14: 1 Results from the GRAPE Model Atsushi KUROSAWA Research and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi,](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649ce65503460f949b498c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
[3] SUMMARY
# Strong non-linearity is observed. # Treatment of natural emission?
# Historical evaluation start date should be 1760 as default value since this period is considered as the beginning of human interventions.
![Page 15: 1 Results from the GRAPE Model Atsushi KUROSAWA Research and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi,](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649ce65503460f949b498c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Thank you for your kind attention.