1 t. fornek [email protected] 1 lusi xcs fidr june 17, 2009 thomas fornek project manager june...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
215 views
TRANSCRIPT
1 T. [email protected]
LUSI XCS FIDRJune 17, 2009
Thomas Fornek
Project Manager
June 17, 2009
LUSIX-Ray Correlation Spectroscopy
Instrument Final Instrument Design Review
INTRODUCTION
2 T. [email protected]
LUSI XCS FIDRJune 17, 2009
LUSI WBS Organization
WBS TITLE
1.1 Project Management
1.2. X-ray Pump Probe Instrument (XPP)
1.3 Coherent X-ray Imaging Instrument (CXI)
1.4X-ray Correlation Spectroscopy
Instrument (XCS)
1.5 Diagnostics and Common Optics (DCO)
1.6 Controls and Data Acquisition (CDA)
3 T. [email protected]
LUSI XCS FIDRJune 17, 2009
6
1 2 34 5
LCLSLUSI
H6
Offset MonochromatorExp. ChamberDetector
Beam Transport
Near Experimental Hall Far Experimental Hall
XPPXCS CXI
AMOH6
Part of LCLS FES
ARRA Funds
SXR
InstallationPart of LCLS
Project description (1)
XCSMono
X-ray Transport
LUSI is Providing Instruments for Three of the Six LCLS Instrument Hutches
4 T. [email protected]
LUSI XCS FIDRJune 17, 2009
Project description (2)
XPPWBS 1.2
LCLS AMO
XCS Offset MonochromatorWBS 1.5
X-ray transport tunnel (200 m)
XCSWBS 1.4
H6
CXIWBS 1.3
LCLSSXR
5 T. [email protected]
LUSI XCS FIDRJune 17, 2009
Project Status (1)
LUSI Baseline Performance (through Apr09)TPC = $60M (MIE = $55.1M, OPC = $4.9M)CD-4 = August 2012TPC >26% Complete, TEC >18% CompleteContingency on MIE = $11.8M
33.2% on remaining work
OPC is complete $50K remaining for close-out
ARRA Funds ($33.6M) Received in AprilPart of the $60M TPC
Most recent added scope to enhance LUSI science program
Large Offset Monochromator for XPPFocusing lens for CXI
6 T. [email protected]
LUSI XCS FIDRJune 17, 2009
Project Status (2)
Design CompletionXPP Instrument Design through FIDR
CD-3 Ready
CXI Instrument FIDR Held June 3
CD-3 Ready Now - Solid Instrument Configuration
XCS Instrument FIDR in June
90% CD-3 Ready Now - Instrument configuration is solid
Diagnostics and Common Optics Design
90% CD-3 Ready Now
Harmonic Rejection Mirror PDR held June 15
Controls and Data Acquisition
100% CD-3 Ready Now
Inherited Designs from LCLS comprise many items
7 T. [email protected]
LUSI XCS FIDRJune 17, 2009
Project Status (3)
Final DOE-IPR Status Review Report ReceivedResponses have been prepared to the report recommendations
Preparing for the July 15, 2009 CD-3 ReviewThe XCS FIDR is the final pre-requisite for this milestone
Held in Germantown
LUSI PM, Instrument Scientists and Controls Rep to travel
Working on the second part of the Baseline Change to incorporate ARRA effects into the baseline
This change incorporates two L2 milestones into schedule
One of these milestones is XCS “Early Science” Instrument Complete
First month of reporting on ARRA accounts has been completed
Some corrections are needed to the baseline – These are nearing completion
9 T. [email protected]
LUSI XCS FIDRJune 17, 2009
Schedule Advancement
XCS “Early Science” allows for a functioning XCS instrument one year earlier than original schedule
Milestone Current
Baseline
Advanced
Baseline
CD-3 April 2010 October 2009
XPP Early Science October 2010 October 2010
CXI Early Science August 2011 June 2011
XCS Early Science (New) NA August 2011
Project Ready for CD-4 (New) NA March 2012
CD-4 August 2012 August 2012
10 T. [email protected]
LUSI XCS FIDRJune 17, 2009
April StatusSLAC Linear Accelerator CenterMenlo Park, California
Cumulative to Date
WBS[2] ActualBudgeted Cost Cost Variance Latest
Work Work Work Schedule Cost Budgeted Revised VarianceScheduled Performed Performed Estimate
1.1 PROJ ECT MANAGEMENT 2,353,987 2,353,987 2,265,241 0 88,746 4,955,382 4,896,892 58,490 1.00 1.04
1.2 X-RAY PUMP PROBE (XPP) 2,167,147 2,078,757 2,066,028 -88,390 12,729 5,728,269 5,680,774 47,495 0.96 1.01
1.3 COHERENT X-RAY IMAGING (CXI) 1,249,718 1,246,825 1,041,390 -2,893 205,435 9,890,267 9,913,328 -23,061 1.00 1.20
1.4 X-RAY CORRELATION SPECTROSCOPY (XCS)
911,719 819,441 836,065 -92,278 -16,624 6,995,690 7,056,112 -60,422 0.90 0.98
1.5 DIAGNOSTICS & COMMON OPTICS 1,213,822 1,203,493 1,191,269 -10,329 12,224 8,311,095 8,541,527 -230,433 0.99 1.01
1.6 CONTROLS AND DATA ACQUISITION 516,891 504,095 514,934 -12,796 -10,839 7,223,124 7,259,346 -36,223 0.98 0.98
Gen. and Admin. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Undist. Budget 0 0 0
Sub Total 8,413,284 8,206,598 7,914,927 -206,685 291,671 43,103,826 43,347,980 -244,154
Management Resrv. (MIE) 11,996,174 11,752,020 244,154
Total MIE 8,413,284 8,206,598 7,914,927 -206,685 291,671 55,100,000 55,100,000 0 0.98 1.04
2.0 Other Project Costs (OPC) 4,851,861 4,851,861 4,851,861 0 0 4,851,861 4,851,861 0
Management Resrv. (OPC) 48,139 48,139 0
Total OPC 4,851,861 4,851,861 4,851,861 0 0 4,900,000 4,900,000 0
Sub Total (MIE+OPC) 13,265,145 13,058,459 12,766,788 -206,685 291,671 47,955,687 48,199,841 -244,154
Total Management Reserve 12,044,313 11,800,159 244,154
Total Project Cost (TPC) 13,265,145 13,058,459 12,766,788 -206,685 291,671 60,000,000 60,000,000 0
SPI CPI
At Completion
LUSI Cost/Schedule Status Report (April 2009)
Performance DataIndices
Date: 6/1/2009
11 T. [email protected]
LUSI XCS FIDRJune 17, 2009
Project Risks and Mitigation
LUSI Follows the LCLS Risk Management Plan and uses the LCLS Risk Registry
LCLS Project Management Document 1.1-002
Risk Registry Updated May, 2009
Major RisksDo something to cause loss or suspension of ARRA funds
Annual funding - Continuing Resolutions (Retired)
Foreign procurements – Dollar fluctuation, sole source
Loss and/or availability of critical personnel (Exercised)
Ability to place procurements in a timely manner
CXI mirror delivery, performance
XPP, XCS Monochromator delivery, performance
XPP, XCS Detector delivery, performance
13 T. [email protected]
LUSI XCS FIDRJune 17, 2009
LCLS Directorate – Detail 1/2009
LCLS DirectorateDale KnutsonMark Reichanadter, Deputy
Business Office
Cindy LoweTBD - Deputy
Accelerator Systems Division
John SeemanTBD - Deputy
P. Miller, Accelerator Safety Officer
Engineering & Physics Division
Dave SchultzJames Krebs, Deputy
TBD – ES&H Coordinator
Experimental Facilities Division
Jochen SchneiderTBD - Chief Operating Officer
TBD – Beam Line Safety Officer
Strategic Projects Division
John Galayda
M. Scharfenstein – Construction Safety
ESH / Work Planning & ControlMichael Scharfenstein
Richard Hislop
Special ProjectsRichard M. Boyce
Uli Wienands
AdministrationHelen O’Donnell, LA De Wan, B. Espiritu, D. Ford, S. Matni, R. Matter, D. Mitchell, P. Tank
14 T. [email protected]
LUSI XCS FIDRJune 17, 2009
Strategic Projects Division (SPD)
John Galayda
M. Scharfenstein, Construction Safety
LCLS Construction ProjectJ. Galayda
M. Reichanadter, DeputyJ. Albino, AD, Civil Const.
LUSI MIE ProjectT. Fornek
TBD, Deputy
RSBJ. Albino
G. Herman, K. Chan-Hui PULSED. Rich
Future UpgradesJ. Galayda
Project Org = 7 FTEs
Project Org = 83 FTEs
Project Org = 10 FTEs
Project Org = 27 FTEs
15 T. [email protected]
LUSI XCS FIDRJune 17, 2009
LUSI Project’s Integrated Project Team
DOE-HQHarriet Kung, Acquisition Executive
T.E. Kiess, Program Manager
DOE-SSOH. Joma
DOE Federal Project Director
SLACT. Fornek
LUSI Project Manager RM Boyce - Deputy
WBS 1.2 XPP IIT
D. Fritz(Instr. Scientist)
WBS 1.3 CXI IIT
S. Boutet(Instr. Scientist)
WBS 1.4 XCS IIT
A. Robert(Instr. Scientist)
WBS 1.5 Diagnostics &
Common OpticsY. Feng
(Lead Scientist)
Instrument TeamLeaders
DOE-SSO Support
WBS 1.6Data Acquisition
& ControlsG. Haller
(Lead)
LCLS Directorate SupportEngineering, Procurement, QA, ES&H, Finance & Budget, PMCS
Technical Configuration Control Committee
.
Installation ManagerB. Poling
16 T. [email protected]
LUSI XCS FIDRJune 17, 2009
CHARGE - 1
Technical ScopeIs the design of the partial instrument mature and technically sound to enable early scientific experiments at LCLS?
Have all of the major interfaces been identified and incorporated in the design?
Have design reviews been performed?
Is the design likely to meet performance expectations?
ManagementIs the instrument team organized and staffed to successfully achieve the milestone?
Have all the major risks been identified and effectively managed?
Are procurements appropriately planned for the partial instrument?
17 T. [email protected]
LUSI XCS FIDRJune 17, 2009
CHARGE - 2
Cost and ScheduleAre the cost and schedule reasonable to achieve the planned scope?
Have the XCS cost and schedule been recently updated?
Is there sufficient cost and schedule contingency to ensure successful completion of the partial instrument on schedule?
ES&HAre all related ES&H aspects being properly addressed?
Overall ReadinessIs XCS ready to begin fabrication and installation at LCLS to begin conducting early scientific experiments?