1 the fact act – an overview the fact act an overview of the final rulemaking on identity theft...

50
1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney, Division of Privacy and Identity Protection Federal Trade Commission

Upload: shona-wilkins

Post on 16-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

1

The FACT Act – An Overview

The FACT Act

An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and

Address Discrepancies

Naomi LefkovitzAttorney, Division of Privacy and Identity ProtectionFederal Trade Commission

Page 2: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

2

Statutory Provisions Implemented

The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (FACT Act) amended the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)

Sections 114 and 315 of the FACT Act

Rules: 72 Fed. Reg. 63718 (November 9, 2007)

http://www.ftc.gov/os/fedreg/2007/november/071109redflags.pdf

Page 3: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

3

Background

Joint rulemaking Final rules published November 9, 2007 Full compliance required by November 1, 2008

Page 4: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

4

Identity Theft Red Flags

FACT Act Section 114

FCRA Section 615(e)

16 CFR 681.2 and 681.3

Page 5: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

5

Identity Theft Red Flags

Risk-based final rule Guidelines (Appendix A) Supplement A (26 examples of red flags)

Page 6: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

6

Purpose of the Red Flags Rule

To detect and stop identity thieves using someone else’s identifying information at your institution to commit fraud.

Distinct from data security

Page 7: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

7

Covered Entities

“Financial institutions” and “creditors” must conduct a periodic risk assessment to determine if they have “covered accounts.”

Page 8: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

8

Definitions

From the FCRA, a “financial institution” is:

A state or national bank A state or federal savings and loan association A mutual savings bank A state or federal credit union, or Any other person that directly or indirectly holds a

transaction account* belonging to a consumer

* From the Federal Reserve Act, Sec. 19(b) - an account that allows withdrawals by negotiable or transferable instrument, payment orders of withdrawal, telephone transfers, or similar items to make payments or transfers to 3rd persons or others.

Page 9: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

9

Definitions (cont’d)

From ECOA, a “creditor” is:

Any person who regularly extends, renews, or continues credit

Any person who regularly arranges for the extension, renewal, or continuation of credit, or

Any assignee of an original creditor who participates in the decision to extend, renew, or continue credit

Page 10: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

10

Definitions (cont’d)

An “account” is: a continuing relationship established by a

person with an FI or creditor to obtain a product or service for personal, household, or business purposes.

Page 11: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

11

Definitions (cont’d)

A “covered account” is:

A consumer account designed to permit multiple

payments or transactions, and Any other account for which there is a reasonably

foreseeable risk from identity theft

Page 12: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

12

Scenario #1

Rural U. has about 1100 students and is located in a small town surrounded by miles of farmland. Tuition is due before classes begin, but a few students are permitted to pay on an installment plan. Students can use cash, credit card, or their student photo ID card for various goods and services on the campus such as at the bookstore or the health clinic. For students who use their ID card, the bookstore sends a bill due upon receipt. The health clinic also bills for amounts unpaid by insurance.

Page 13: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

13

Scenario #2

Metro U. serves about 40,000 students in an urban setting. It has many graduate schools, and is affiliated with a hospital. Students have a variety of loan options, including the Perkins Loan Program. In many cases, loan amounts are applied directly to tuition, but students can also get checks directly for living expenses. Metro U. also provides students with a debit card, Metrobucks, linked to a prepaid declining balance account. Students can use the Metrobucks card on and off campus to purchase food, books, etc. Students also have the option to link the Metrobucks card to a checking account at Big Bank.

Page 14: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

14

Program Requirement

Financial institutions and creditors with covered accounts must implement a written Identity Theft Prevention Program to detect, prevent, and mitigate identity theft in connection with: the opening of a covered account, or any existing covered account

Page 15: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

15

Program Requirement (con’t)

The Program must be appropriate to the size and complexity of the financial institution or creditor and the nature and scope of activities.

Page 16: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

16

Elements of the Program Must include reasonable policies and procedures to:

Identify relevant red flags* and incorporate them into the Program

Detect red flags that are part of the Program Respond appropriately to any red flags that are detected Ensure the Program is updated periodically to address

changing risks

* A red flag is a pattern, practice, or specific activity that could indicate identity theft

Page 17: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

17

Administration of the Program

Obtain approval of the initial Program by the board or a committee thereof

Thereafter may designate a senior management employee to oversee: Development, implementation, and administration of

the Program Training of appropriate staff Service provider arrangements

Page 18: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

18

Consideration of the Guidelines

Rules require:

Consideration of the Guidelines Incorporation of appropriate Guidelines into the Program

Page 19: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

19

Identity Theft

Red Flag Guidelines

Page 20: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

20

Overview of the Guidelines

I. Incorporate existing policies and procedures

II. Identify relevant red flags

III. Procedures to detect red flags

IV. Appropriate responses to red flags

V. Periodic updating of the Program

VI. Administering the Program

VII. Other legal requirements

Page 21: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

21

I. Incorporate Existing Policies and Procedures

Existing anti-fraud program Information security program

Page 22: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

22

II. Identify Relevant Red Flags

Risk factors for identifying relevant red flags are:

Types of covered accounts offered or maintained Methods provided to open or access covered

accounts Previous experiences with identity theft

Page 23: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

23

II. Identify Relevant Red Flags (cont’d)

Sources of red flags are:

Incidents of identity theft that have been experienced

Methods of identity theft reflecting changes in identity theft risks

Applicable supervisory guidance

Page 24: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

24

II. Identify Relevant Red Flags (cont’d)

Five categories of red flags* are:

Alerts, notifications, or other warnings received from consumer reporting agencies or service providers

Presentation of suspicious documents Presentation of suspicious personal identifying information Unusual use of, or other suspicious activity related to, a covered

account Notice from customers, victims of identity theft, or law enforcement

authorities

* 26 examples are found in Supplement A

Page 25: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

25

III. Procedures to Detect Red Flags

Verify identity Authenticate customers Monitor transactions Verify validity of address changes

Page 26: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

26

IV. Appropriate Responses to Red Flags

Monitor accounts Contact customer Change passwords Close and reopen account Refuse to open account Don’t collect on or sell account (against the true

consumer) Notify law enforcement No response is warranted

Page 27: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

27

V. Periodic Updating of the Program

Experience with identity theft Changes in methods of identity theft Changes in methods to detect, prevent, and

mitigate identity theft Changes in types of accounts offered Changes in business arrangements

Page 28: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

28

VI. Administering the Program

Oversight of the Program by the Board or a senior management employee involves:

Assigning specific responsibility for

implementation Reviewing reports Approving material changes in the Program

Page 29: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

29

VI. Administering the Program (cont’d)

Reports to the Board or senior management employee: At least annually Address material matters

Service provider arrangements Effectiveness of the policies and procedures in

addressing the risk of identity theft in connection with covered accounts

Significant incidents involving identity theft and management’s response

Recommendations for material changes to the Program

Page 30: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

30

VI. Administering the Program (cont’d)

Oversight of service providers:

Ensure the service provider’s activities are

conducted in accordance with reasonable policies

and procedures designed to detect, prevent, and

mitigate the risk of identity theft

Page 31: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

31

VII. Other Legal Requirements

Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) Other FCRA provisions (e.g. 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2,

information furnisher duties to update or correct inaccurate information, and not report inaccurate information)

Page 32: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

32

Examples of Red Flags (Supp. A)

Warning from consumer reporting agencies

Suspicious documents

Suspicious personal information

Inconsistent with external information sources

Documents provided for identification appear to be altered

Fraud or active duty alert included in consumer report

Page 33: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

33

Examples of Red Flags (cont’d)

Unusual use of account

Notice from customers Customer notifies institution about identity theft.

Account used in a manner that is not consistent with historical patterns of activity

Page 34: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

34

Enforcement of Red Flags Rules

Administrative enforcement under Section 621 of the FCRA.

No private right of action State Attorneys General No criminal penalties

Page 35: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

35

Don’t Panic!

The Programs are risk-based and flexible.

Consider the bigger picture.

Page 36: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

36

Rule on

Duties of Card Issuers Regarding Changes of

Address

Page 37: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

37

Identity Theft Red Flags

FACT Act Section 114

FCRA Section 615(e)

16 CFR 681.3

Page 38: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

38

Covered Entities

Financial institutions or creditors that issue debit or credit cards.

Page 39: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

39

Address Validation

A card issuer must have reasonable policies and procedures to assess an address change when:

A consumer sends a notice of address change, and The card issuer receives a request for an

additional or replacement card within at least the first 30 days after the address change notice.

Page 40: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

40

Address Validation (con’t)

Before issuing the additional or replacement card, the card issuer must:

Notify* the cardholder of the request and allow a reasonable means to report an incorrect address change, or

Otherwise assess the validity of the address change in accordance with its Identity Theft Prevention Program

*Notice can be given at the cardholder’s former address or by any other communication means agreed upon.

Page 41: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

41

Alternative Timing

The card issuer may fulfill the requirements of this rule when it receives the address change notification, before receiving the request for the additional or replacement card.

Page 42: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

42

Form of Notice

The notice may be written or electronic, but it must be clear and conspicuous* and be provided separately from regular correspondence with the cardholder.

*reasonably understandable and designed to call attention to the nature and significance of the information.

Page 43: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

43

Rule on

Notices of

Address Discrepancy

Page 44: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

44

Notices of Address Discrepancy

FACT Act Section 315

FCRA Section 605(h)

16 CFR 681.1

Page 45: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

45

Notices of Address Discrepancy

Duties of users of consumer reports that

receive a “notice of address discrepancy”

from a nationwide consumer reporting agency

(NCRA as defined in FCRA)

Page 46: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

46

Notices of Address Discrepancy

“Notice of address discrepancy” notifies the

user of a substantial difference between:

Address the user provided, and Address in the NCRA’s files

Page 47: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

47

Notices of Address Discrepancy

Regulatory Requirement:

The user must have reasonable policies andprocedures to establish a reasonable belief that theconsumer report relates to the consumer about whom the report was requested

Page 48: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

48

Notices of Address Discrepancy

Establishing a reasonable belief –– Examples

Compare information in the consumer report to information the user:

Maintains in its records Obtains from third-party sources Obtained to comply with CIP rules

Verify information in the consumer report with the consumer

Page 49: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

49

Notices of Address Discrepancy

Regulatory Requirement:

The user must have reasonable policies and procedures tofurnish a confirmed address for the consumer to the NCRA,when the user:

Can form a reasonable belief that the report relates to the consumer

Establishes a continuing relationship with the consumer Regularly furnishes information to the NCRA

Page 50: 1 The FACT Act – An Overview The FACT Act An Overview of the Final Rulemaking on Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Naomi Lefkovitz Attorney,

Naomi Lefkovitz

Federal Trade Commission

[email protected]

(202) 326-3058