100 µm defect-related recombination and free-carrier diffusion near an isolated defect in gaas mac...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 100 µm Defect-related recombination and free-carrier diffusion near an isolated defect in GaAs Mac Read and Tim Gfroerer, Davidson College, Davidson, NC](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d145503460f949e8a03/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
100 µm 100 µm
100 µm100 µm
Defect-related recombination and free-carrier diffusion near an isolated defect in GaAs
Mac Read and Tim Gfroerer, Davidson College, Davidson, NCMark Wanlass, National Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO
Conduction Band
Valence Band
ENER
GY
Defect LevelHEAT
HEAT
+
-
Conduction Band
Valence Band
LIGHT
+
-
Defect-related Recombination Radiative Recombination
Electrons can recombine with holes in semiconductors by hopping through localized defect states and releasing heat. This defect-related trapping and recombination process is a loss mechanism that reduces the efficiency of many semiconductor devices.
Motivation
D
-
x
y D-
- +
d
+
-
--+
D
d
Low-excitation
Defect Electron Hole
High-excitation
+
++
y
x
Diffusion
The carrier lifetime is determined by how long it takes an electron to find a suitable hole for recombination. At low excitation density, electrons are more likely to encounter a defect before a hole, allowing for defect-related trapping and recombination. At high excitation, the electrons and holes don’t live as long, reducing the diffusion length d and the probability of reaching a defect before radiative recombination occurs.
Simple Model Results
Photoluminescence images are obtained from an undoped GaAs/GaInP heterostructure. The excitation intensity-dependent images shown above center on an isolated defect in the thin, passivated GaAs layer.
Experimental Images
100 µm 100 µm
100 µm 100 µm
We model the defect as an isolated pixel with an augmented rate of defect-related recombination An. Diffusion to this pixel reduces the carrier density n near the defect, and since brightness is proportional to the radiative rate Bn2, the adjacent region appears darker. This model yields poor agreement between experiment and theory.
If we allow the defect rate coefficient A to vary with excitation, we can reproduce our experimental results. However, variation of A with excitation is non-physical. We need a better model for defect-related recombination.
Complex Model Results
AbstractWhen defects are present in semiconductors, localized energy levels appear within the bandgap. These new electronic states accommodate heat-generating recombination – a problematic energy loss mechanism in many semiconductor devices. But at high excitation, the density of electrons and holes is higher, so they encounter each other more frequently. Early encounters augment light-emitting recombination, reducing the average lifetime and diffusion distance so the carriers are less likely to reach defects. In images of the light emitted by GaAs, we observe isolated dark regions (defects) where the darkened area decreases substantially with increasing excitation. When we model the behavior with a simulation that allows for lifetime-limited diffusion and defect-related recombination only through mid-bandgap energy levels, we do not obtain good agreement between the experimental and simulated images. A more sophisticated model which allows for an arbitrary distribution of defect levels within the bandgap produces results that are more consistent with experimental images.
The algorithm to find steady state carrier densities (n) in each pixel follows a simple rate equation including generation, recombination, and Laplacian diffusion:
)()( tDiffusion
rate
ionrecombinat
Radiative
rate
ionrecombinat
Defect
rate
Generationtn
Time Step Algorithm
Where:
• We use Laplacian diffusion to determine the flux between adjacent pixels during each time step and then calculate new carrier densities.
• We allow the diffusion process to continue until the average lifetime of the generated carriers is reached.
2
2 )(
dx
ndDDiffusion n
Rates
ncombinatioRe(Depend on the model)
Simple Recombination ModelSimple Model Assumptions:
* All defect states are located near the middle of the bandgap so we neglect thermal excitation of carriers into bands.
Method: We determine the 2 A coefficients (one for the defect pixel and one for the non-defective pixels) that minimizes the error between the measured and simulated efficiencies.
ndNdP
2BnAn
rate
ionrecombinat
Total
Where: dN = number of electrons in the conduction band dP = number of holes in the valence band n = total number of excited carriers A = defect constant B = radiative constant
Complex Recombination Model
dNdPBdDPdNdDNdPA
rate
ionrecombinat
Total
**)**(
Where: Aτ = 1 / defect capture time (1/τ ) dDn = number of trapped electrons dDp = number of trapped holes
-0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4
1E16
1E17
DO
S (
#/cm
3)
Defective Pixel DOS vs Energy
Energy (% of band gap)
The new defect-related DOS function shown above fits our radiative efficiency measurements by generating asymmetric band filling. When the electron traps are saturated, the concentration of electrons in the conduction band dN rises sharply with excitation. Since a high concentration of holes dP is already present in the valence band, a rapid increase in the radiative rate BdPdN occurs.
We thank Jeff Carapella for growing the test structures, and Caroline Vaughan and Adam Topaz for their work on finding the DOS functions. We also thank the Davidson Research Initiative and the Donors of the American Chemical Society – Petroleum Research Fund for supporting this work.
Acknowledgments
Conclusions• Even for high-quality semiconductor materials with few defects, diffusion can lead to significant defect
recombination at low excitation intensity.• At low density, carriers diffuse more readily to defective regions rather than recombining radiatively, producing
larger effective “dead” areas.• Assigning a single defect coefficient to each pixel and allowing for diffusion does not yield good agreement, but
by allowing the coefficient to change with laser intensity, we can reproduce the experimental images.• A more sophisticated model which allows for an arbitrary distribution of defect levels within the bandgap
produces results that are more consistent with experimental images.