10.13.15 final pc packet items 43 to 82
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
1/690
Agenda Item No.:43.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 13, 2015
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion
SUBJECT:GPA-61055 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: THE ERNEST A. BECKER IV AND KATHLEEN C. BECKERFAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: R
(RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AND RNP (RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD
PRESERVATION) TO: SC (SERVICE COMMERCIAL) on 10.00 acres at the southeast corner
of Elkhorn Road and Hualapai Way (APNs 125-19-101-002 and 010), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-
60894]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 11/18/2015
PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 2 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0
RECOMMENDATION:Staff recommends DENIAL
BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report - GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057 [PRJ-60894]3. Supporting Documentation - GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057 [PRJ-60894]4. Photo(s) - GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057 [PRJ-60894]
5. Justification Letter - GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057 [PRJ-60894]
6. Protest Postcard - GPA-61055 and ZON-61056 [PRJ-61057]7. Protest Letter - GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057 [PRJ-60894]
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
2/690
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
3/690
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
4/690
GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057 [PRJ-60894]
YK
AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2015DEPARTMENT: PLANNINGITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: THE ERNEST A. BECKER IV AND
KATHLEEN C. BECKER FAMILY TRUST
** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **
CASE
NUMBERRECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
GPA-61055 Staff recommends DENIAL.
ZON-61056 Staff recommends DENIAL. GPA-61055
SDR-61057 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:GPA-61055
ZON-61056
** CONDITIONS **
SDR-61057 CONDITIONS
Planning
1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for General Plan Amendment
(GPA-61055) and Rezoning (ZON-61056) shall be required, if approved.
2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time may be filed forconsideration by the City of Las Vegas.
3. All development shall be in conformance with the building elevations, date stamped09/15/15, and the site plan, landscape plan, date stamped 09/16/15, except as amended by
conditions herein.
4. A Waiver from Title 19.08.040 B 6 is hereby approved, to allow for commercial buildings
to be located away from the street frontage.
5. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department of Building andSafety.
6. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set submittedfor building permit.
7. The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staff to determine themost appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots. The mapping
action shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance of any building permits.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
5/690
GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057 [PRJ-60894]
YK
Conditions Page Two
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
8. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape
Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at the same
time application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground sprinkler systemis required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory manner; the landscape
plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility
of any traffic control device.
9. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants and
water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of any
combustible structures.
10. A Comprehensive Construction Staging Plan shall be submitted to the Department of
Planning for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. The
Construction Staging Plan shall include the following information: Design and location ofconstruction trailer(s); design and location of construction fencing; all proposed temporary
construction signage; location of materials staging area; and the location and design of
parking for all construction workers.
11. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be satisfied,
except as modified herein.
Public Works
12. Where such does not exist, dedicate 50 feet for Hualapai Way, 50 feet for Elkhorn Road, 30
feet for Eula Street, and 30 feet for Wittig Avenue adjacent to this site prior to the issuanceof off-site permits. Additionally, dedicate appropriate radius corners and grant appropriate
easements at all four corners of this site per Standard Drawing #201.3.S1, additionalright-of-way per Standard Drawing #201.1 on Hualapai way and Elkhorn Road, and a bus
turnout/right turn lane per Standard Drawing #234.4 on Elkhorn Road prior to the issuance
of off-site permits.
13. Construct all half-street improvements on Hualapai Way, Elkhorn Road, Wittig Avenue,
and Eula Street per current City Standards including traffic signal underground
infrastructure at the southeast corner of Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road adjacent to thissite concurrent with development of this site. All existing off-site improvements damaged
or removed by this development shall be restored at its original location and to its originalwidth concurrent with development of this site.
14. Unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer, construct sidewalk on at least one side of
all access drives connecting this site to the adjacent public streets concurrent with
development of this site. The connecting sidewalk shall extend from the sidewalk on thepublic street to the first intersection of the on-site roadway network and shall be terminated
on-site with a handicap ramp.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
6/690
GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057 [PRJ-60894]
YK
Conditions Page Three
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
15. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section of the Department of Fire Services to
discuss fire requirements for the proposed use of this facility.
16. All private improvements and landscaping installed with this project shall be situated and
maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at all
development access drives and abutting street intersections.
17. Submit an Encroachment Agreement to the City of Las Vegas for all landscaping and
private improvements in the Hualapai Way, Elkhorn Road, Eula Street, and Wittig Avenue
public rights-of-way adjacent to this site. The applicant must carry an insurance policy forthe term of the Encroachment Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally
insured entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall remove
property encroaching in the public right- of way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the
terms of the City's Encroachment Agreement. The installation and maintenance of allprivate improvements in the public right of way shall be the responsibility of the adjacent
property owner(s) and shall be transferred with the sale of the property for the entire term
of the Encroachment Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the EncroachmentAgreement with the Land Development Section of the Department of Building and Safety
(702 229 4836).
18. A Traffic Impact Analysis must be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public
Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits, submittal of any
construction drawings or the recordation of a Map subdividing this site, whichever may
occur first. Comply with the recommendations of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis
prior to occupancy of the site. The Traffic Impact Analysis shall also include a sectionaddressing Standard Drawings #234.1 #234.2 and #234.3 to determine additional right-of-
way requirements for bus turnouts adjacent to this site, if any; dedicate all areasrecommended by the approved Traffic Impact Analysis. All additional rights of way
required by Standard Drawing #201.1 for exclusive right turn lanes and dual left turn lanes
shall be dedicated prior to or concurrent with the commencement of on site developmentactivities unless specifically noted as not required in the approved Traffic Impact Analysis.
Phased compliance will be allowed if recommended by the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis. No recommendation of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis, nor compliance
therewith, shall be deemed to modify or eliminate any condition of approval imposed bythe Planning Commission or the City Council on the development of this site.
19. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by the
Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits orsubmittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve
all drainageways recommended in the approved drainage plan/study. The developer of this
site shall be responsible to construct such neighborhood or local drainage facilityimprovements as are recommended by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage
Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
7/690
GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057 [PRJ-60894]
YK
Staff Report Page One
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting to have an undeveloped 10-acre site located on the southeast corner
of Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road designated as commercial property for the development of a60,900 square-foot shopping center. Currently the property has a residential land use and zoning
designation. The specific request is for a General Plan Amendment (GPA-61055) from: R
(Rural Density Residential) and RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation) to: SC (Service
Commercial) and a Rezoning (ZON-61056) from: R-E (Residence Estates) to: C-1 (Limited
Commercial); and a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-61057) with a Waiver. Staffrecommends denial of all three applications. Staffs recommendation is based on the need for a
residential transition from low to medium density residential on this site. If denied, the sitewould remain a residentially zoned property and no building permits would be issued for
commercial development.
ISSUES
A Waiver is required to allow commercial buildings to be located away from corner streetfrontage. Staff does not support this request.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
01/09/13
The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (ANX-46720) 10.02 acres at
the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Hualapai Way. It was effective on01/22/13.
Most Recent Change of Ownership
12/30/92 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership on both parcels.
Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
There are no records on file at this time.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
8/690
GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057 [PRJ-60894]
YK
Staff Report Page Two
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
Pre-Application Meeting
08/24/15
Staff met with the applicant and reviewed plans for a proposed shopping
center on 10.02 acres at the southeast corner of Hualapai Way and ElkhornRoad. Staff determined that a General Plan Amendment, Rezoning and SiteDevelopment Plan Review applications would be required. The GPA requires
a neighborhood meeting. After discussing the project with the applicant, the
applicant stated that their intent was to submit a final application that wouldrequire no Deviations, Waivers or Exceptions from Title 19 development
standards.
Neighborhood Meeting
09/22/15
Start: 6:00 p.m. End: 7:00 p.m.
Applicant4 CLV Staff3 Public37Issues:
Two people were in favor of the project and 35 were opposed;
Vacancy rate in commercial center on the SWC of Hualapai Way andElkhorn Road is already high, another is not needed;
Always been on the Plans as an R-E zoned residential property;
Fears of additional traffic on nearby residential streets; and
Some residents were more in favor of keeping it residential, but wouldsupport slightly higher densities.
Field Check
09/03/15Staff visited the site and found an undeveloped parcel with desert vegetation
throughout. No issues were noted.
Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 10.02
SurroundingProperty
Existing Land UsePer Title 19.12
Planned or SpecialLand Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
Subject Property Undeveloped
R (Rural DensityResidential)
R-E (Residence Estates)RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation)
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
9/690
GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057 [PRJ-60894]
YK
Staff Report Page Three
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per Title 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use DesignationExisting Zoning District
North Undeveloped L (Low DensityResidential) R-1 (Single-FamilyResidential)
South
UndevelopedRL (Residential Low)
Clark County
R-E (Rural Estates
Residential District) ClarkCounty
Single Family,
Dwelling
East
Undeveloped RNP (Rural
NeighborhoodPreservation) Clark
County
R-E (Rural Estates
Residential District) Clark
CountySingle Family,
Dwelling
West Shopping Center
PCD (Planned
Community
Development)
PD (PlannedDevelopment)
Master Plan Areas Compliance
No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification Assessment) N/A
Project of Regional Significance N/A
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Pursuant to Title 19.08.070, the following standards apply:
Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 600 Feet Y
Min. Setbacks
Front
Side
Corner
Rear
10 Feet
10 Feet10 Feet
20 Feet
28 Feet
N/A26 Feet
27 Feet
Y
N/AY
Y
Max. Lot Coverage 50 % 18 % Y
Max. Building Height N/A 35 Feet Y
Trash EnclosureScreened, Gated, w/ a Roof or
Trellis
Screened, Gated, w/
a Roof or TrellisY
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
10/690
GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057 [PRJ-60894]
YK
Staff Report Page Four
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
Pursuant to Title 19.08, the following standards apply:
Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided ComplianceRatio Trees
Buffer Trees:
North
South
East
West
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
22 Trees
30 Trees
29 Trees29 Trees
22 Trees
30 Trees
29 Trees29 Trees
Y
Y
YY
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 110 Trees 110 Trees Y
Parking Area Trees
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
end of each row of spaces
81 Trees 81 Trees Y
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHSMin. Zone Width
North
South
East
West
15 Feet
15 Feet15 Feet
15 Feet
15 Feet
15 Feet15 Feet
15 Feet
Y
YY
Y
Wall Height 6 Feet Adjacent to Residential 6 Feet Y
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Governing Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Hualapai Way Primary ArterialPlanned Streets and
Highways Map100 Y
Elkhorn Road Primary ArterialPlanned Streets and
Highways Map100 Y
Wittig AvenueMinor Collector
StreetTitle 19.04 60 Y
Eula StreetMinor Collector
StreetTitle 19.04 60 Y
Pursuant to Title 19.04 Complete Streets Standards apply:Streetscape Standards Required Provided Compliance
Hualapai WayPrimary
ArterialFrom back of curb installa three-foot wide amenity
area and a five-foot wide
sidewalk.
From back of curb
install a three-foot wide
amenity area and afive-foot wide
sidewalk.
YElkhorn RoadPrimary
Arterial
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
11/690
GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057 [PRJ-60894]
YK
Staff Report Page Five
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
Streetscape Standards Required Provided Compliance
Wittig AvenueMinor
Collector Street From back of curb installa five-foot wide amenity
area and a five-foot widesidewalk.
From back of curb
install a five-foot wideamenity area and a
five-foot wide
sidewalk.
YEula StreetMinor Collector
Street
Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Use
Gross Floor
Area or
Number of
Units
Required Provided Compliance
Parking
Ratio
Parking Parking
Regular
Handi-
capped Regular
Handi-
capped
Shopping
Center60,900 SF
1 Per 250
SF244
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 244 293 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 237 7 282 11 Y
Loading Spaces 4 6 Y
Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
To place commercial buildingsadjacent to street frontage on
corner parcels.
To allow for commercial buildingsto be located away from the street
frontage on corner parcels.
Denial
ANALYSIS
The subject site is located in the Centennial Hills Sector of the General Plan and has a currentGeneral Plan designation of R (Rural Density Residential) and RNP (Rural Neighborhood
Preservation) and zoning of R-E (Residence Estates). This is a proposal to amend the General
Plan designation to SC (Service Commercial) and Rezone to C-1 (Limited Commercial). The
Service Commercial category allows low to medium intensity retail, office, or other commercialuses that serve primarily local area patrons and that do not include more intense general
commercial characteristics. Examples include neighborhood shopping centers, theaters, and
other places of public assembly and public and semi-public uses. This category also includesoffices either singly or grouped as office centers with professional and business services.
The proposed Service Commercial General Plan designation is not compatible with the existing
residential uses. Although the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plans Newly Developing Areas Policy
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
12/690
GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057 [PRJ-60894]
YK
Staff Report Page Six
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
3.1.5 states: That urban hubs at the intersections of primary roads, containing a mix of high
density residential, commercial and office uses, and containing pedestrian linkages, be
supported and Policy 3.1.2, which states: That new residential neighborhoods emphasizepedestrian linkages within the neighborhood, ready access to transit routes, linkages to schools,
integration of local service commercial activities within a neighborhood center that is within
walking distance of homes in the neighborhood be supported; the specific conditions of thissite make it non-compatible with surrounding residential development.
There has been little evidence of substantial residential growth in the area north of CC-215 and
west of Grand Canyon Drive with only 1,217 new housing unit permits being issued in the pasttwo years for this 4,269.76 acre area.
The proposed 60,900 square-foot retail shopping center is similar in design to other such
commercial projects found in the northwest area of the city. The center will feature a majoranchor tenant, such as a grocery store, with smaller retail and restaurant pads throughout the site.
A convenience store with fuel pumps is proposed for the northwest corner of the project. A
Waiver is requested to allow commercial buildings to be located away from the corner streetfrontages. The applicant has indicated that the proposed tenants have requested that parking
being visible in front of their proposed stores as part of their business model. Staff does not
support this request. Both the commercial use and the specific design is not compatible with theresidential development of the area.
The residential rural neighborhoods on the east and south of the properties will be buffered from
the project with a six-foot high wall on the south and a three-foot high landscape berm on the
east. A 15-foot wide landscape buffer, in addition to complete street landscape standards, willencircle the project. Staff finds that a more appropriate residential development would be more
suitable as a transition from the low density residential development on the east and south of thesite with the higher density residential developments to the north and west of the site.
The main ingress and egress drives to the project are located off the two primary arterial streets.
However, there is a drive aisle proposed off Eula Street. This drive aisle will allow traffic tobypass the primary arterial roads and use Eula Street, which is not designed to handle such traffic
volumes. This will create a negative impact on the adjacent residential areas, specifically those
that front onto to Eula Street. Staff advised the applicant to work to eliminate vehicle assess
from Eula Street. The applicant indicated a desire to maintain their original proposal, keepingthe Eula Street vehicle access.
This project required a Development Impact Notice and Assessment (DINA) form based on the
number of daily trips the project is expected to generate. On average 550 daily trips are expectedto be added to Elkhorn Road and 11,016 daily trips are expected to be added to Hualapai Way.
Both rights-of-way, once completely developed, will be capable of handling these expected trips.
Overall, staff believes that commercial development is not appropriate and cannot be designed to
be compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhoods. For these reasons, staff
recommends denial of all three applications.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
13/690
GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057 [PRJ-60894]
YK
Staff Report Page Seven
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
FINDINGS (GPA-61055)
Section 19.16.030(I) of the Las Vegas Zoning Code requires that the following conditions be metin order to justify a General Plan Amendment:
1. The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is compatible
with the existing adjacent land use designations,
The proposed amendment is not compatible with the existing adjacent residential land
uses. The Las Vegas 2020 Master Plans Map 15 Potential Future Urban Hubs andTransit Routes does not designate the intersection of Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road as
such an urban hub. Although the Newly Developing Areas chapter of the Las Vegas 2020
Master Plan supports development of such hubs via policy 3.1.5, which states: That
urban hubs at the intersections of primary roads, containing a mix of high densityresidential, commercial and office uses, and containing pedestrian linkages, be
supported, this specific intersection is not identified as such and therefore is not
compatible for the area.
2. The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment will be compatible with
the existing adjacent land uses or zoning districts,
The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment are not compatible with
the existing adjacent land use and zoning designations. This location is not identified
on Map 15 of the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan as a site for future commercial
development.
3. There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility, and other facilities to
accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General Plan
Amendment; and
The site is primarily accessed by Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road, two, 100-foot Primary
Arterials, as designated by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways.
4. The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and policies
that include approved neighborhood plans.
This proposed amendment is not in conformance with the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan,as it does not identify the intersection of Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road as a future
urban hub site.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
14/690
GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057 [PRJ-60894]
YK
Staff Report Page Eight
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
FINDINGS (ZON-61056)
In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the PlanningCommission or City Council must affirm the following:
1. The proposal conforms to the General Plan.
The proposed SC (Service Commercial) General Plan designation for this site is not
supported by staff; therefore, the proposed C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning is not in
conformance with the General Plan.
2. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the rezoning
will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning districts.
The uses allowed by the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district are not compatible
with the surrounding land uses and zoning district.
3. Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.
There is approved, undeveloped commercial property located nearby indicating that there
is not a current need for additional commercial zoning in the area.
4. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.
The site is primarily accessed by Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road, two 100-foot PrimaryArterials, as designated by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. These rights-of-way
would be adequate to meet the traffic demands that could be generated with the proposed
zoning district; however, residential development would be more compatible with theadjacent developments.
FINDINGS (SDR-61057)
In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) thePlanning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:
1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and
development in the area;
The proposed commercial development is not compatible with the adjacent residential
neighborhoods. Specifically, this location is not designated as a future urban hub in the
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
15/690
GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057 [PRJ-60894]
YK
Staff Report Page Nine
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan and the project is not designed to Title 19 standards as
evidenced by the Waiver to allow commercial buildings to be located away from the
corner street frontages. Additionally, the driveway access to Eula Street is not
compatible with adjacent residential development.
2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the Design
Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other duly-
adopted city plans, policies and standards;
The proposed development is not compatible with the Community Design Element of
the General Plan and the Development Standards of the Unified Development Code,
both of which encourage buildings to be located adjacent to corner street frontages in
order to encourage walkability.
3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or
neighborhood traffic;
The site is primarily accessed by Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road, two, 100-foot PrimaryArterials, as designated by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. Eula Street provides
secondary access to the site. Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road are adequate to meet the
traffic demands that could be generated with this proposal. However, the drive aisle onto
Eula Street will have a negative impact on the properties that front Eula Street.
4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;
The buildings are typical stucco encased wood and concrete structures with tile roof and
stone accent architectural details. The color pallet features desert colors of pales, yellows
and Nepal and will blend well with residential and commercial development in the area.
5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic
features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatible
with development in the area;
The project will create an undesirable and unsightly appearance by locating all the parking
around the perimeter of the project and not locating the buildings along the property linesand/or street frontages.
6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety and
general welfare.
As this site is not designated as a commercial urban hub in the Las Vegas 2020 MasterPlan; approval of the project would not be in the general welfare of the public.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
16/690
GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057 [PRJ-60894]
YK
Staff Report Page Ten
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 47
NOTICES MAILED 191 - GPA-61055 and ZON-61056
191 - SDR-61057
APPROVALS 0
PROTESTS 0
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
17/690
GPA-61055
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
18/690
Application Number: PRJ-60894
Application/Petition For: GPA, ZON, SDR
ProjectAddress (Location): SEC HUALAPAI AND ELKHORN
Project Name HAULAPAI PLAZA
Assessors Parcel #(s): 12519101002, 12519101010
Ward #: WARD 6 (STEVEN D. ROSS)
s the Application InformationCorrect:
Yes
f no, ...change what
General Plan Designation: Proposed: Select
Zoning District: Proposed: Select
Gross Acres:
Lots/Units:
Additional Information:
Applicant First Name: Ernest A. Becker IV and Kathleen C. Becker Family Trust
Applicant Last Name: Ernest A. Becker IV and Kathleen C. Becker Family Trust
Applicant Address: 8090 South Durango Drive, Suite 115
Applicant City: Las Vegas
Applicant State: Nevada
Applicant Zip: 89113
Applicant Phone: 702-395-9244 X415
Applicant Fax: 702-395-4155
Applicant Email: [email protected]
Rep First Name: Ernest A.
Rep Last Name: Becker IV
Rep Address: 8090 South Durango Drive, Suite 115
Rep City: Las Vegas
Rep State: Nevada
Rep Zip: 89113
Rep Phone: 702-395-9244 X415
Rep Fax: 702-395-4155
Rep Email: [email protected]
Page 1 o8/31/2015 2:14:07 PM
CLV Planning - Application Form
GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
19/690
certify that I am the applicant andhat the information submitted withhis application is true and accurateo the best of my knowledge and
belief. I understand that the City isnot responsible for inaccuracies innformation presented, and thatnaccuracies, false information or
ncomplete application may causehe application to be rejected. Iurther certify that I am the owner
or purchaser (or option holder) ofhe property involved in this
application, or the lessee or agentully authorized by the owner to
make this submission. Accept:
Yes
s the Owner Information Correct: Yes
f no, ...change what
Owner(s) ADDR1 ADDR2BECKER ERNEST A IV & K C FAMTR
8090 S DURANGO DR #115 LAS VEGAS, NV 89113-4427
CLVEPLAN Applicant Company Title Email
Aravind Yelamanchili CLV IT Contractor [email protected]
Ernest A Becker IV Ernest A. Becker IV and KathleenC. Becker Family Trust
Trustee [email protected]
Page 2 o8/31/2015 2:14:07 PM
CLV Planning - Application Form
GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
20/690
A
A
AA
A
A
A
A
A
AA
A
A
A
AA
AA
AA
A
AAAA
A
A
A
AA
A
GPA-61055
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
21/690
G
6 1 0
O 6 1
0 6
S 6 1 0
S
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
22/690
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
23/690
G P
A 6 1 0 5 5
Z O N 6
1 0 5 6 a n d S D R 6
1 0 5 7 R E V I S E D
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
24/690
GPA-61055[PRJ-6
0894]-GENERALPLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
ZON-61056ANDS
DR-61057-
APPLICANT/OWNE
R:THEERNESTA.BECK
ERIVANDKATHLEENC.BECKERFAMILYTRUST
SOUTHEASTCORN
EROFELKHORNROADANDHUALAPAIWAY
09/03/15
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
25/690
GPA-61055[PRJ-6
0894]-GENERALPLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
ZON-61056ANDS
DR-61057-
APPLICANT/OWNE
R:THEERNESTA.BECK
ERIVANDKATHLEENC.BECKERFAMILYTRUST
SOUTHEASTCORN
EROFELKHORNROADANDHUALAPAIWAY
09/03/15
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
26/690
GPA-61055[PRJ-6
0894]-GENERALPLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
ZON-61056ANDS
DR-61057-
APPLICANT/OWNE
R:THEERNESTA.BECK
ERIVANDKATHLEENC.BECKERFAMILYTRUST
SOUTHEASTCORN
EROFELKHORNROADANDHUALAPAIWAY
09/03/15
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
27/690
A
A
A
A
A
A A A
A
A
GPA-61055, ZON-61056 and SDR-61057
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
28/690
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
29/690
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
30/690
Agenda Item No.:44.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 13, 2015
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion
SUBJECT:ZON-61056 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-61055 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/
OWNER: THE ERNEST A. BECKER IV AND KATHLEEN C. BECKER FAMILY TRUST -For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: C-1
(LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on 10.00 acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and
Hualapai Way (APNs 125-19-101-002 and 010), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-60894]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
C.C.: 11/18/2015
PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 2 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0
RECOMMENDATION:Staff recommends DENIAL
BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:1. Consolidated Backup2. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-61056 and SDR-61057 [PRJ-60894]
3. Supporting Documentation
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
31/690
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Pleaserefer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
32/690
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
33/690
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
34/690
ZON-61056
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
35/690
A
A
AA
A
A
A
A
A
AA
A
A
A
AA
AA
AA
A
AAAA
A
A
A
AA
A
ZON-61056
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
36/690
Agenda Item No.:45.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 13, 2015
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion
SUBJECT:SDR-61057 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-61055 AND ZON-
61056 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/ OWNER: THE ERNEST A. BECKER IV ANDKATHLEEN C. BECKER FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Site
Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 60,900 SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL
SHOPPING CENTER AND A WAIVER TO ALLOW COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS TO BE
LOCATED AWAY FROM CORNER PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY on 10.00 acres at the
southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Hualapai Way (APNs 125-19-101-002 and 010), R-E(Residential Estates) [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial] Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-
60894]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 11/18/2015
PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 2 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:
BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:1. Consolidated Backup2. Supporting Documentation
3. Protest Postcard
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
37/690
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Pleaserefer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
38/690
SDR-61057
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
39/690
SDR 61057
The Ernest A. Backer IV & Kathleen C. Becker Family Trust
SEC Elkhorn Road & Hualapai Way
Proposed 72.9 thousand square foot retail center.
First Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
SHOPPING CENTER [1000 SF] 46.4
42.94 1,992
AM Peak Hour 1.00 46
PM Peak Hour 3.73 173
Second Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
DRIVE-IN BANK [1000 SF] 5.1
148.15 756
AM Peak Hour 12.35 63
PM Peak Hour 25.82 132
Third Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)CONVENIENCE MARKET W/GAS
[FUELING POSITIONS]16
542.60 8,682
AM Peak Hour 16.57 265
PM Peak Hour 19.07 305
Fourth Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)FAST-FOOD WITH DRIVE-THRU [1000
SF] 4
496.12 1,984
AM Peak Hour 49.35 197
PM Peak Hour 33.84 135
Total Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
SHOPPING CENTER [1000 SF] 72.9
42.94 13,414
AM Peak Hour 1.00 571
PM Peak Hour 3.73 745
Existing traffic on all nearby streets:Elkhorn Road
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 550
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 44
Hualapai Way
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 11,016
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 881
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
40/690
Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:
Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
Elkhorn Road 16,300
Hualapai Way 25,400
This project will add approximately 13,414 trips per day on Elkhorn Rd., Hualapai Wy, Eula Ave. and Wittig Ave. Elkhornis currently at about 3 percent of capacity and Hualapai is at about 43 percent of capacity. After this project, Elkhorn isexpected to be at about 86 percent of capacity and Hualapai to be at about 96 percent of capacity. Counts are not
available for Eula or Wittig, but they are believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 745 additional cars, or twenty-five every twominutes.
Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
41/690
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
42/690
Agenda Item No.:46.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 13, 2015
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion
SUBJECT:GPA-61258 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES - For possible action on a requestfor a General Plan Amendment FROM: SC (SERVICE COMMERCIAL) TO: PF (PUBLIC
FACILITIES) on 4.85 acres on the southeast corner of Lake Mead Boulevard and Pink Rose
Street (APN 139-21-314-001), Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-61257]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
C.C.: 11/18/2015
PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL
BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report - GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267 [PRJ-61257]3. Supporting Documentation - GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267 [PRJ-61257]
4. Photo(s) - GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267 [PRJ-61257]5. Justification Letter - GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267 [PRJ-61257]
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
43/690
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
44/690
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
45/690
GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267 [PRJ-61257]
NE
AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2015DEPARTMENT: PLANNINGITEM DESCRIPTION:
** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **
CASE
NUMBERRECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
GPA-61258 Staff recommends APPROVAL.
ZON-61259 Staff recommends APPROVAL. GPA-61258
SDR-61267 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: GPA-61258
ZON-61259
** CONDITIONS **
SDR-61267 CONDITIONS
Planning
1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Rezoning (ZON-61258)
shall be required, if approved.
2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time may be filed for
consideration by the City of Las Vegas.
3. All development shall be in conformance with site plan(s) date stamped 09/23/15; and
landscape plan and building elevations date stamped 09/14/15, except as amended by
conditions herein.
4. A Waiver from Title 19.10.020 is hereby approved, to allow a 5-foot, 4-inch wide
landscape buffer along a portion of the north property line, adjacent to the parking lot,where a 15-foot wide buffer is required for residential adjacency.
5. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department of Building andSafety.
6. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set submittedfor building permit.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
46/690
GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267 [PRJ-61257]
NE
Conditions Page Two
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
7. The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staff to determine the
most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots. The mapping
action shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance of any building permits.
8. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape
Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at the sametime application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground sprinkler system
is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory manner; the landscape
plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility
of any traffic control device.
9. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants and
water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of any
combustible structures.
10. Prior to the submittal of a building permit application, the applicant shall meet with
Department of Planning staff to develop a comprehensive address plan for the subject site.A copy of the approved address plan shall be submitted with any future building permit
applications related to the site.
11. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be satisfied,
except as modified herein.
Public Works
12. Prior to the issuance of any permits, dedicate 30-feet of right-of-way along the south side
of Winter Snow Avenue from Tonopah Drive to Pink Rose Street including the remainingportion of the cul-de-sac where the two streets intersect. Additionally, grant a 5-foot
Pedestrian Access Easement adjacent to the existing right-of-way on Lake Mead
Boulevard. The recordation of a Parcel Map, such as PMP-60740, may be used to satisfythis condition.
13. In accordance with code requirements of Title 13.16 and 13.56, remove all substandard
improvements (sidewalk) and replace with new improvements meeting Current CityStandards concurrent with development of this site. All existing paving damaged or
removed by this development shall be restored at its original location and to its originalwidth concurrent with development of this site.
14. Construct a median in Lake Mead Boulevard to restrict lefts into the egress only driveway
on Lake Mead Boulevard concurrent with on-site development activities. Additionally,
construct the driveway on Lake Meade Boulevard to be egress only. The geometric designfor both the median and the driveway shall meet the approval of the City Traffic Engineer.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
47/690
GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267 [PRJ-61257]
NE
Conditions Page Three
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
15. Relocate the existing school zone flasher on the north side of Lake Mead Boulevard to a
location acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer concurrent with on-site development
activities.
16. Landscape and maintain all unimproved right-of-way adjacent to this site. All landscaping
and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and maintained so asto not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at all development access
drives and abutting street intersections.
17. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by theDepartment of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits or
submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve
all drainageways recommended in the approved drainage plan/study. The developer of this
site shall be responsible to construct such neighborhood or local drainage facilityimprovements as are recommended by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage
Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
48/690
GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267 [PRJ-61257]
NE
Staff Report Page One
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request to amend a portion of the Southeast Sector Plan of the General Plan from SC
(Service Commercial) to PF (Public Facilities) on 4.85 acres on the southeast corner of LakeMead Boulevard and Pink Rose Street. The two additional companion requests consists of a
request for a Rezoning (ZON-61259) from R-E (Residence Estates) to C-V (Civic); and for a
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-61267) for a proposed 55,000 square-foot building for a
Public School, Primary Use, with a Waiver of the Landscape Buffer standard. The project
proposed is an expansion of the existing West Preparatory Institute School for AcademicExcellence at Charles I. West Hall (West Prep Academy) onto a vacant lot to the north of the
existing campus that will include a new 55,000 square-foot building to house the elementaryschool and replace the existing 25 portables. The expansion also includes an additional 65
parking spaces for staff and visitors, and new play areas including a kindergarten playground, a
general play area, and a new sodded play field. The Waiver requested is for a portion of therequired Landscape Buffer along Lake Mead Boulevard, adjacent to the proposed parking lot.
Staff finds the proposed West Prep Academy Elementary School Addition to be compatible with
the existing school campus and surrounding area; and the Waiver requested to be minor in
nature; therefore, staff recommends approval of the Site Development Plan Review andrequested Waiver.
Amending the General Plan designation to PF (Public Facilities) and Rezoning the subject site toC-V (Civic) allows for the proposed elementary school expansion to be combined with the
existing campus to the south into one harmonious campus site through a remapping action. The
PF (Public Facilities) General Plan designation as well as the proposed C-V (Civic) zoning
district are intended for public uses such as schools, and is compatible and harmonious with thesurrounding area; therefore, staff recommends approval of both the General Plan Amendment
and Rezoning applications. If these applications are denied, the General Plan designation would
remain SC (Service Commercial), the zoning would remain R-E (Residence Estates) preventing
the applicant from completing a remapping application to combine the two adjacent parcels intoone harmonious school campus. A Special Use Permit would then be required for a Public
School, Primary on an R-E (Residence Estates) zoned lot.
ISSUES
Public Works has granted an administrative approval for a Waiver of the Complete StreetsStandard.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
49/690
GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267 [PRJ-61257]
NE
Staff Report Page Two
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
Title 19.10.020 requires property adjacent to residential uses be subject to the landscape
buffer standards of 19.08.040. A Waiver is being requested for a portion of the landscapebuffer along the northern property line adjacent to the parking lot, for a proposed a five-foot
landscape buffer where 15-feet is required. Staff is recommending approval of the Waiver
request.
Per Title 19.030 the existing West Prep Academy to the south of the subject site has beendeemed parking impaired. With this proposed expansion, West Prep Academy will be
replacing the existing 25 portable buildings that currently house 50 classrooms, with the
proposed expansion to the north. The proposed expansion will include 35 classrooms, and an
additional 65 parking spaces where currently only 122 spaces are provided for. This willdecrease the required parking with the reduction in classrooms, and increase the parking
being provided for from 122 to 187.
The proposed General Plan Amendment request must be approved in order for the requestedRezoning to C-V (Civic) to be approved.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.
No relevant City actions.
Most Recent Change of Ownership
06/23/06 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.
Related Building Permits/Business Licenses
No related building permits, and/or business licenses.
Pre-Application Meeting
09/11/15A pre-application meeting was held with staff where the submittal
requirements for a General Plan Amendment and Rezoning were discussed.
Neighborhood Meeting
10/28/15A neighborhood meeting is scheduled to be held at the West Prep Academy
cafeteria located at 2050 Saphire Stone Avenue at 6:00 p.m.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
50/690
GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267 [PRJ-61257]
NE
Staff Report Page Three
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
Field Check
09/22/15
Staff conducted a field check and observed the subject vacant lot adjacent to
the existing West Prep Academy.
09/29/15
Staff conducted a field check of the existing West Prep Academy at 1:20 p.m.
and observed a full parking lot, with 36 vehicles parked along Saphire StoneAvenue, 10 vehicles parked along Pink Rose Street, and 4 vehicles parked
along Winter Snow Avenue. The parked vehicles appeared to be overflow
staff parking from the existing parking lot as no parents were observedwaiting for their children at the time.
Details of Application Request
Site Area
Net Acres 4.85
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use
Per Title 19.12
Planned or Special
Land Use DesignationExisting Zoning District
Subject Property VacantSC (ServiceCommercial)
R-E (Residence Estates)
North Vacant
Multifamily Residential
(City of North Las
Vegas)
R-3 [Multifamily (City ofNorth Las Vegas)]
South West PreparatoryAcademy PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
East Office LI/RC-PB (Planned Business
Park)
West VacantSC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Master Plan Areas Compliance
West Las Vegas Plan *Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District - 105 Feet YOther Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification Assessment) N/A
Project of Regional Significance N/A
* Objective 2.6: To improve the amount and quality of infill development on vacant andunderutilized lands within established areas of the city.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
51/690
GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267 [PRJ-61257]
NE
Staff Report Page Four
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Pursuant to19.10.020 , the following standards are proposed:Standard *Provided
Lot Size 211,266 SF
Lot Width 325 Feet
Setbacks
Front
Side
Corner
Rear
10 Feet15Feet
171Feet
375Feet
Distance Between Buildings 30Feet
Lot Coverage 26%Building Height 26 Feet
Trash Enclosure Existing
Mech. Equipment Existing
*A Site Development Plan Review establishes minimum development standards for property inthe C-V (Civic) zoning district. The standards shall be designed to ensure compatibility of thedevelopment with existing and planned development in the surrounding area.
Pursuant to19.08.110, the following standards apply:
Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
North
South
East
West
1 Tree / 20 Linear FeetN/A
Existing
**
29 TreesN/A
Existing
**
29 TreesN/A
N/A
3
YN/A
N/A
N/A
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES **29 Trees 32 Trees **Y
Parking Area Trees
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Spaces, plus 1 tree at theend of each row of spaces
21 Trees 22 Trees Y
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHSMin. Zone Width Required Provided Compliance
North
South
East
West
15 Feet
ExistingExisting
N/A
*5 Feet and 16.5 Feet
N/AN/A
0 and 13
*N
N/AN/A
**Y
Wall Height Not Indicated Not Indicated N/A
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
52/690
GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267 [PRJ-61257]
NE
Staff Report Page Five
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
*The applicant is requesting a Waiver of the Landscape Buffer requirement for a portion of theLandscape Buffer along Lake Mead Boulevard, adjacent to the parking lot, to provide a 5-foot
landscape buffer where fifteen feet is required for residentially adjacent property.**The minimum development standards, including the Landscape Buffer requirements whenadjacent to commercially zoned property, are established through the Site Development Reviewprocess.
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Governing Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Lake Mead
BoulevardPrimary Arterial
Master Plan of Streets
and Highways100 Y
*Pursuant to Title 19.18.030, the following parking standards apply for a parking impaired
site:
Parking
Use Gross
Floor
Area or
Number
of Units
Existing Parking Gross
Floor
Area or
Number
of Units
Proposed Parking
Public
or
PrivateSchool,
Primary
Class-
rooms
Parking
Ratio
ParkingClass-
roomsParking
Ratio
Parking
Regular Handi-
capped
Regular Handi-
capped
115 1: 0.94114 8
100 1: 1.87176 11
122 187
* Per Title 19.18.030 the existing West Prep Academy has been deemed parking impaired. Thecurrent site houses 65 classrooms in the main structure and an additional 50 classrooms beingprovided through 25 portables. The proposed parking configuration demonstrates a 15classroom reduction with the elimination of the portable classrooms, and 65 additionalparking spaces for a new combined site parking ratio of 1: 1.87.
Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
To provide a 15-foot wide
landscape buffer along the
northern property line.*
To allow a five-foot
wide landscape bufferalong a portion of the
northern property line
adjacent to the parking
lot.
Approval
*Title 19.10.020 requires property adjacent to residential uses be subject to the landscape bufferstandards of 19.08.040(F).
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
53/690
GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267 [PRJ-61257]
NE
Staff Report Page Six
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
ANALYSIS
The applicant is proposing to amend the General Plan designation from SC (ServiceCommercial) to PF (Public Facilities), and to rezone the subject site from R-E (Residence
Estates) to C-V (Civic). The proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezoning are appropriate,
since the PF (Public Facilities) General Plan designation and the C-V (Civic) zoning district areintended for public uses such as schools. The West Prep Academy has been in existence on the
parcel just south of the subject site, approval of this application allows for the applicant to
complete remapping action (PMP-60740) and combine the two parcels into one for a harmonious
educational campus serving students K (Kindergarten) through the 12th
Grade. The proposedGeneral Plan designation of PF (Public Facilities) and the proposed zoning district of C-V
(Civic) are more appropriate for the existing use as they are intended for public uses such as
schools, than both the current General Plan designation of SC (Service Commercial) and the
current zoning district of R-E (Residence Estates). Staff recommends approval of bothapplications.
In addition to the General Plan Amendment and the Rezoning applications, the applicant has alsorequested a Site Development Plan Review for the proposed West Prep Academy Elementary
School Addition to be constructed on a 4.85 acre vacant lot adjacent to the north of the existing
West Prep Academy. The primary goal of the proposed addition is to eliminate the twenty-fiveportables that currently house 50 classrooms, and to provide the students with a permanent
educational facility. The elementary school addition site will also provide the students additional
play areas specifically designed for each age group: elementary, middle-school, and senior high-
school. In addition, a designated school bus loading and unloading area capable of
accommodating up to eight school buses at once will also be incorporated into the expansionarea. The proposed school addition also includes 65 additional parking spaces for staff members
and visitors, and a student drop-off/pick-up zone in front of the elementary school addition. Theaddition of a designated bus loading zone, student drop-off/pick-up zone, and 65 additional
parking spaces will improve site circulation for students, parents, staff, and area residents. Staff
finds the proposed elementary school addition to be compatible and harmonious with the existingschool site, as well as the surrounding residential and commercial developments and
recommends approval of this application.
While the applicant does their best to predict the number of students enrolling each school year,there will be times when enrollment exceeds classroom availability. The applicant has
acknowledged that in times of need, up to four portables may be brought in to be housed wherethe basketball courts are to provide enough classroom space when enrollment fluctuates beyond
their estimations.
The applicant has requested a Waiver of the Landscape Buffer requirements for residential
adjacency for a portion of the landscape buffer along Lake Mead Boulevard adjacent to theproposed parking lot. The reduced landscape buffer was a result of the need for a twenty-four
foot fire lane adjacent to the parking area. The applicant not only met the required landscape
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
54/690
GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267 [PRJ-61257]
NE
Staff Report Page Seven
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
buffer requirement for the remaining portion adjacent to Lake Mead Boulevard, but extended it
to 16.5 feet to compensate for the reduced landscaping adjacent to the proposed parking lot. Staff
finds the Waiver request to be minor in nature since the adjacent residentially zoned property tothe north is separated from the subject site by Lake Mead Boulevard, a 100-foot primary arterial,
and will not be directly impacted by a portion of this landscape buffer being reduced to 5 feet.
Staff recommends approval of the Waiver request.
Per Title 19.04.010, where a proposed development is adjacent to existing improvements, the
Director of Public Works shall determine the extent to which it is appropriate to implement the
standards outlined in this Chapter and approve, if necessary, designs for the transition fromexisting improvements to those that meet the standards of this Chapter; staff acknowledged the
existing improvements (sidewalk) already in place along Lake Mead Boulevard adjacent to the
subject site and both to the east and west of the subject site along Lake Mead Boulevard as well.
Rather than destroying improvements already in place, the Department of Public Works hasgranted an administrative approval for a Waiver of the Complete Streets requirement and has
conditioned the approval of this Site Development Plan Review to include a 5-foot Pedestrian
Access Easement adjacent to the existing right-of-way on Lake Mead Boulevard.
The existing West Prep Academy has been deemed parking impaired per Title 19.18.030. The
current site houses 65 classrooms in the main structure and an additional 50 classrooms beinghoused in 25 portables. The proposed elementary school addition demonstrates a fifteen
classroom reduction with the elimination of the portables. The students currently being housed
in the portables will relocate to the new 55,000 square-foot elementary addition once
completed. The replacement of the portables with a new, permanent structure reduces the
overall classroom count by 15; therefore, reducing the amount of parking required by code andlessening the level of impairment. The overall reduction of the 15 classrooms, and the addition of
65 parking stalls for staff and visitors increases the current parking ratio from 0.94 parking spaceper classroom to 1.87 parking space per classroom.
FINDINGS (GPA-61258)
Section 19.16.030(I) of the Las Vegas Zoning Code requires that the following conditions be met
in order to justify a General Plan Amendment:
1. The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is compatiblewith the existing adjacent land use designations,
The density and intensity of the proposed PF (Public Facilities) General Plan designation is
compatible with the existing adjacent PF (Public Facilities), LI/R (Light
Industry/Research), and SC (Service Commercial) land use designations; and theresidentially zoned property along the north side of Lake Mead Boulevard in North Las
Vegas, Nevada.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
55/690
GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267 [PRJ-61257]
NE
Staff Report Page Eight
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
2. The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment will be compatible with
the existing adjacent land uses or zoning districts,
The proposed General Plan designation allows for the special purpose zoning district of C-
V (Civic). This district is compatible with the existing adjacent land uses and zoning
districts and will support the existing surrounding residential developments.
3. There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility, and other facilities to
accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General Plan
Amendment; and
Primary access to the school campus will continue to be provided by Saphire Stone
Avenue, a 47-foot Residential Street, as designated by the Master Plan of Streets and
Highways. Only ingress from Pink Rose Street and egress onto Lake Mead Boulevard arebeing provided for with the proposed elementary school expansion. The proposed addition
will eliminate the portable classrooms and provide staff and visitors with additional
parking stalls, alleviating the need for street parking along Saphire Stone Avenue. Thesubject site will be sufficiently served by existing roadway facilities.
4. The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and policies
that include approved neighborhood plans.
The subject site is located within The West Las Vegas Plan which is also included in theNeighborhood Revitalization area of the Master Plan 2020 (Ordinance #2000-62 adopted
09/06/2000). Part of the goals, objectives, and policies addressed in the NeighborhoodRevitalization area include improving the amount and quality of infill development on
vacant lands. This project takes an undeveloped vacant lot and transforms it into an activeeducational facility for the area residents and their children.
FINDINGS (ZON-61259)
In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning
Commission or City Council must affirm the following:
1. The proposal conforms to the General Plan.
The proposed C-V (Civic) zoning district conforms to the proposed PF (Public Facilities)General Plan designation.
2. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the rezoning
will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning districts.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
56/690
GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267 [PRJ-61257]
NE
Staff Report Page Nine
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
The proposed C-V (Civic) zoning district allows for public facilities such as schools,
which are compatible and harmonious with the surrounding residential and commercial
land uses and zoning districts.
3. Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.
The proposed rezoning is appropriate as the existing southern portion of the West Prep
Academy has been in existence since 1998. Growth has dictated the need for the existing
educational facility to expand, and Rezoning the subject site will allow for the applicant toremap the entire site into one harmonious campus.
4. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.
Public access to the existing site is provided for by Saphire Stone Avenue, a 47-foot
Residential Street, and will continue to be the primary public access point for the schoolcampus after the proposed addition is completed. Since the proposed addition replaces
existing portable classrooms, reducing the amount of classrooms and increasing the
amount of available parking stalls for staff and visitors, the site will continue to besufficiently served by the existing roadway facilities.
FINDINGS (SDR-61267)
In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:
1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and
development in the area;
The existing West Prep Academy was approved as part of a Rezoning action (Z-96-95) in
1995. The proposed addition will replace portable classrooms with a permanent
structure, and provide much needed additional parking for staff and visitors. Staff finds therequested Waiver of Standards for a portion of the landscape buffer to be minor in nature
and not to have a negative impact on the surrounding developments. The proposedexpansion of the West Prep Academy will continue to be compatible with adjacent
developments.
2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the Design
Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other duly-
adopted city plans, policies and standards;
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
57/690
GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267 [PRJ-61257]
NE
Staff Report Page Ten
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
The proposed development is consistent with the proposed General Plan Amendment of
PF (Public Facilities) and the companion Rezoning request for C-V (Civic). The Civic
zoning district allows for the site standards to be determined through the Site DevelopmentPlan Review process. Staff has found the proposed development to be compatible and
harmonious with both the existing West Prep Academy campus and the surrounding area,
with the Waiver of the Landscape Buffer requirement for a portion of the LandscapeBuffer along Lake Mead Boulevard to be minor in nature and not having a negative impact
on the proposed site or surrounding area.
3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or
neighborhood traffic;
Site access will not change from its current configuration with the exception of the
addition of a paved fire access lane that will also serve as a school bus access lane for anew loading and unloading zone to be constructed along the southern edge of the subject
site in conjunction with the elementary addition. The existing site circulation and proposed
school bus loading and unloading zone will not negatively impact adjacent roadways orneighborhood traffic. In addition, the additional 65 parking stalls being added as part of
this campus addition will alleviate the street parking along Saphire Stone Avenue by staff
and visitors.
4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;
The proposed building materials are appropriate for the City and include cement, plaster,
split face veneer, stucco, composite materials, and metal trimming and roofing. Landscapematerials proposed include Holly Oak trees, Texas Ranger shrubs, and sod for a play field.
These materials are compatible with our desert environment and appropriate for aneducational facility.
5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic
features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatible
with development in the area;
The building elevations depict sufficient contrasts of texture and color, with varied
materials for enhanced visual interest, and demonstrate a building that is aestheticallycompatible with the existing school facility as well as the surrounding residential and
commercial developments. Careful attention was paid to the existing school site and howbest to integrate the new elementary school building and bus loading zone to create one
harmonious campus that will look as though it was constructed in one phase instead of
two.
6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety and
general welfare.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
58/690
GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267 [PRJ-61257]
NE
Staff Report Page Eleven
October 13, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting
The proposed development is subject to permit review and inspection, thereby protecting
the publics health, safety and general welfare.
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 14
NOTICES MAILED 395 - GPA-61258 and ZON-61259
395 - SDR-61267
APPROVALS 0
PROTESTS 0
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
59/690
GPA-61258
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
60/690
GPA-61258
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
61/690
A
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
A
AA
A
AA
A
A
A
A
A
A
AAA
A
AA
AA
A
AA
A
A
A
A
A
GPA-61258
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
62/690
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
63/690
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
64/690
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
65/690
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
66/690
AAA
GPA-61258ZO
N-61259andSDR-61267
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
67/690
AAA
G P A 6 1 2 5 8 Z
O N 6 1 2 5 9 a n d S
D R 6 1 2 6 7
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
68/690
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
69/690
GPA-61258[PRJ-6
1257]-GENERALPLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
ZON-61259ANDS
DR-61267-
APPLICANT/OWNE
R:SCHOOLBOARDOFT
RUSTEES
SOUTHEASTCORN
EROFLAKEMEADBOUL
EVARDANDPINKROSE
STREET
09/22/15
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
70/690
GPA-61258[PRJ-6
1257]-GENERALPLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
ZON-61259ANDS
DR-61267-
APPLICANT/OWNE
R:SCHOOLBOARDOFT
RUSTEES
SOUTHEASTCORN
EROFLAKEMEADBOUL
EVARDANDPINKROSE
STREET
09/22/15
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
71/690
GPA-61258[PRJ-6
1257]-GENERALPLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
ZON-61259ANDS
DR-61267-
APPLICANT/OWNE
R:SCHOOLBOARDOFT
RUSTEES
SOUTHEASTCORN
EROFLAKEMEADBOUL
EVARDANDPINKROSE
STREET
09/29/15
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
72/690
GPA-61258[PRJ-6
1257]-GENERALPLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
ZON-61259ANDS
DR-61267-
APPLICANT/OWNE
R:SCHOOLBOARDOFT
RUSTEES
SOUTHEASTCORN
EROFLAKEMEADBOUL
EVARDANDPINKROSE
STREET
09/29/15
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
73/690
GPA-61258[PRJ-6
1257]-GENERALPLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
ZON-61259ANDS
DR-61267-
APPLICANT/OWNE
R:SCHOOLBOARDOFT
RUSTEES
SOUTHEASTCORN
EROFLAKEMEADBOUL
EVARDANDPINKROSE
STREET
09/29/15
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
74/690
GPA-61258[PRJ-6
1257]-GENERALPLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
ZON-61259ANDS
DR-61267-
APPLICANT/OWNE
R:SCHOOLBOARDOFT
RUSTEES
SOUTHEASTCORN
EROFLAKEMEADBOUL
EVARDANDPINKROSE
STREET
09/29/15
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
75/690
GPA-61258[PRJ-6
1257]-GENERALPLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
ZON-61259ANDS
DR-61267-
APPLICANT/OWNE
R:SCHOOLBOARDOFT
RUSTEES
SOUTHEASTCORN
EROFLAKEMEADBOUL
EVARDANDPINKROSE
STREET
09/29/15
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
76/690
GPA-61258[PRJ-6
1257]-GENERALPLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
ZON-61259ANDS
DR-61267-
APPLICANT/OWNE
R:SCHOOLBOARDOFT
RUSTEES
SOUTHEASTCORN
EROFLAKEMEADBOUL
EVARDANDPINKROSE
STREET
09/29/15
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
77/690
GPA-61258[PRJ-6
1257]-GENERALPLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
ZON-61259ANDS
DR-61267-
APPLICANT/OWNE
R:SCHOOLBOARDOFT
RUSTEES
SOUTHEASTCORN
EROFLAKEMEADBOUL
EVARDANDPINKROSE
STREET
09/29/15
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
78/690
GPA-61258[PRJ-6
1257]-GENERALPLAN
AMENDMENT
RELATED
TO
ZON-61259ANDS
DR-61267-
APPLICANT/OWNE
R:SCHOOLBOARDOFT
RUSTEES
SOUTHEASTCORN
EROFLAKEMEADBOUL
EVARDANDPINKROSE
STREET
09/29/15
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
79/690
GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
80/690
GPA-61258, ZON-61259 and SDR-61267
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
81/690
Agenda Item No.:47.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 13, 2015
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion
SUBJECT:ZON-61259 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-61258 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES - For possible action on a requestfor a Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: C-V (CIVIC) on 4.85 acres at the
southeast corner of Lake Mead Boulevard and Pink Rose Street (APN 139-21-314-001), Ward 5
(Barlow) [PRJ-61257]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
C.C.: 11/18/2015
PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL
BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:1. Consolidated Backup
2. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-61259 and SDR-61267 [PRJ-61257]3. Supporting Documentation
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
82/690
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Pleaserefer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
83/690
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
84/690
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
85/690
ZON-61259
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
86/690
ZON-61259
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
87/690
A
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
A
AA
A
AA
A
A
A
A
A
A
AAA
A
AA
AA
A
AA
A
A
A A
A
ZON-61259
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
88/690
Agenda Item No.:48.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 13, 2015
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion
SUBJECT:SDR-61267 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-61258 AND ZON-
61259 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES -For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED
55,000 SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING FOR A PUBLIC SCHOOL, PRIMARY USE on 4.85
acres at the southeast corner of Lake Mead Boulevard and Pink Rose Street (APN 139-21-314-
001), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone [PROPOSED: C-V (Civic) Zone], Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-
61257]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
C.C.: 11/18/2015
PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0
RECOMMENDATION:Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
89/690
Consistent with the Citys
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Pleaserefer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
90/690
SDR-61267
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
91/690
SDR-61267
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
92/690
Agenda Item No.:49.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: OCTOBER 13, 2015
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion
SUBJECT:MOD-61039 - SUMMERLIN MAJOR MODIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
PULTE HOMES OF NEVADA, ET AL - OWNER: HOWARD HUGHES COMPANY, LLC,ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Summerlin Major Modification of an approved
Development Plan for Village 26 on 300.16 acres at the northwest corner of Lake Mead
Boulevard and Clark County 215 (APNs 137-13-101-007 and 008; 137-14-501-004; and 137-14-
601-002), P-C (Planned Community) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-60662]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
C.C.: 11/18/2015
PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0
RECOMMENDATION:Staff recommends APPROVAL
BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:1. Location and Aerial Maps - MOD-61039 and TMP-60968 [PRJ-60662]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - MOD-61039 and TMP-60968 [PRJ-60662]3. Supporting Documentation - MOD-61039 and TMP-60968 [PRJ-60662]4. Photo(s) - MOD-61039 and TMP-60968 [PRJ-60662]
5. Justification Letter
6. Approval Letter from the Summerlin Design Review Committee
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
93/690
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
94/690
-
7/23/2019 10.13.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 43 to 82
95/690
MOD-61039 and TMP-60968 [PRJ-60662]
SS
AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2015DEPARTMENT: PLANNINGITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: PULTE HOMES OF NEVADA, ET AL - OWNER:
HOWARD HUGHES COMPANY, LLC, ET AL
** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **
CASE
NUMBERRECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
MOD-61039 Staff recommends APPROVAL.
TMP-60698 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: MOD-61039
** CONDITIONS **
TMP-60698 CONDITIONS
Planning
1. Approval of the Tentative Map shall be for no more than four (4) years. If a Final Map is
not recorded on all or a portion of the area