13 nov 2001infrasound workshop, kona array geometry and signal observations david a mccormack head...

36
13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Canada

Upload: kaia-crist

Post on 02-Apr-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Array Geometry and Signal Observations

David A McCormackHead of Monitoring and Analysis

Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Canada

Page 2: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Topics

• IMS design array response for ‘realistic’ signals – how bad is bad?

• Initial studies of signal coherence as an indicator of maximum source distance

Page 3: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Array Response

• Brown(2000) and Christie(2001) have illustrated problem of significant sidelobes in response pattern of 4-element infrasound array. Christie described response of various geometries with more elements and demonstrated superior characteristics of 7 and 8 element arrays.

Page 4: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Brown(2000) - 1Brown(2000) - 10.125 Hz 0.5 Hz

Spatial Aliasing: DLIAR Array

Page 5: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Brown (2000) – 2Brown (2000) – 21.0 Hz 2.0 HzSpatial Aliasing: DLIAR Array

Page 6: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Array Geometry

Page 7: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

SHUTTLE - time

Page 8: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Shuttle

Page 9: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Brown(2000) - 3IS10 Winnipeg, Canada

December 16, 1999 to

September 1, 2000 Approximately 4200 detections

N

E

S

W

microbaroms,Pacific Ocean (?)

microbaroms, Hudson Bay ?

mining activity, Minnesota, registersstrongly on local seismic

Local blasting Thunder Bay area,too small to register on local seismic

?

Local blasting,Too small to registeron local seismic

Page 10: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Sine – 4 elements

Page 11: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Sine – 7 elements

Page 12: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Synthetic Signals

• Difficult to find narrowband real signals

• Synthetic Signals– Bandlimited white noise – identical on each

channel – perfectly coherent– Superimposed on a bandlimited white

background incoherent between channels– S/N adjustable, duration adjustable

Page 13: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Synth 0.25-1,4

Page 14: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Synth 0.25-1,7

Page 15: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Synth 0.4-0.6,4

Page 16: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Synth 0.4-0.6,7

Page 17: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Summary I

• Even for narrow-band signals, side lobes are not large

• Suggests more analysis of real events is required before final decisions on cost/benefit of densification should be made

Page 18: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Signal Coherence

• Grew out of studies of optimal array aperture for detection/location

• Coherence as a routinely calculated intrinsic parameter of an observed signal

Page 19: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Local – time series

Page 20: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Local – freq content

Page 21: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Local - coherence

Page 22: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

MINNTAC - time

Page 23: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

MINNTAC – freq content

Page 24: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

MINNTAC - coherence

Page 25: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

SHUTTLE - time

Page 26: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Shuttle – freq content

Page 27: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Shuttle - coherence

Page 28: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Pacific Freq

Page 29: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Pacific Bolide Coherence

Page 30: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Alberta Freq

Page 31: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Alberta Bolide Coherence

Page 32: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Recorded sources

Page 33: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Processing

• Noise corrected under assumption of incoherent noise

• Interpolate to 1.5 km station spacing

• Ignore differences between radial and transverse coherence (this is wrong)

Page 34: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Coherence vs distance

Page 35: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Ms 7.4 Hector Mine, California Earthquake - Acoustic Arrival

Page 36: 13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,

13 Nov 2001 Infrasound Workshop, Kona

Summary II

• Contributions to coherence from source and path

• General trend of maximum coherence vs. distance

• May be useful for to establish maximum distance to observed source