1.3 review: civil- military synergies m6... · 2020. 2. 3. · ational cen x sion) ieceu t no...

D1.3 Review

Imp

Lead bene

Delivery da

Revision: 2

Dissemin

PU: Publi

PP: Restr

RE: Restr

w: Civil- Milit

proving the

eficiary: Nat

ate: M6

2.0

nation Leve

c

ricted to oth

ricted to a g

tary Synergie

e Effective

1.3 Rev

ional Defen

el

her program

group specif

es

PRO

eness of C

view: Ci

nce Universi

mme particip

fied by the c

Public

OJECT TIT

Capabilitie

vil- Mili

ity/ Finnish

pants (includ

consortium

TLE:

es (IEC) in

tary Sy

Defence Fo

ding the Co

(including t

n EU confl

nergies

orces Intern

mmission)

the Commis

Contrac

Start date

Duration

ict preven

s

national Cen

X

ssion)

IECEU

ct no 653371

: 01/05/2015

n: 33 months

ntion

ntre

U

5

s

D1.3 Review Revision h

Rev. D

1.0 1

1.1 7

1.2 2

1.3 1

1.4 2

1.5 2

1.6 0

1.7 1

1.8 2

1.9 2

2.0 1

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

history

Date

16/06/2015

7/07/2015

29/07/2015

10/08/2015

20/09/2015

25/09/2015

07/10/2015

14/10/2015

25/10/2015

29/10/2015

11/09/2015

tary Synergie

eceived funding from

Author

NDU,

NDU,

NDU,

NDU,

NDU,

NDU,

NDU,

CMCF

NDU,

CMCF

NDU,

NDU,

LAU, K

es

the European Union

r

E. Norvanto

E. Norvanto

E. Norvanto

E. Norvanto

E. Norvanto

E. Norvanto

E. Norvanto

FI, J. Muston

E. Norvanto

FI, J. Muston

E. Norvanto

E. Norvanto

K. Hyttinen

PU

n’s Horizon 2020 rese

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

nen

o

nen

o

o

earch and innovation

Notes

Rough delivera

Structu

Final damong

Plan fpanel d

All the collecte

Rough delivera

Final deliverainterna

Internawhole beginnconsor

Generacomple

Final d

Final V

n programme under g

structurable

ure set (sub

distribution the team c

for the datadiscussions

data used ed

draft oable

draft of able and bel review

al review codocument

ing of gentium

al review eted

raft

Version to be

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

re for

headings e

of the tacompleted

a collection completed

for the deli

of the w

f the weginning of

ompleted oft by partnneral review

by consor

e submitted

IECEUoject: 653371: 01/05/2015n: 33 months

653371

ii

the

tc.)

asks

and

very

whole

whole f the

f the ners, w by

rtium

d

U

5 s

i

D1.3 Review Contents

LIST OF TA

LIST OF FIG

EXECUTIVE

ACRONYM

1 INTRODU

1.1 Purpo

1.2 Struct

2 CIVIL- MI

2.1 Devel

2.2 Scope

2.3 Civil-

2.4 Civil-

2.5 Comp

2.6 Concl

3 EU’S CO ..................

3.1 CSDP

3.1.1 K

3.1.2 In

3.2 Civilia

3.3 Lesso

3.4 Plann

3.4.1 E

3.4.2 P

3.4.3 C

3.4.4 In

3.4.5 F

3.4.5 T

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ABLES .........

GURES .......

E SUMMARY

S .................

UCTION .......

ose of the de

ture of the de

LITARY REL

lopment of th

e of the inter

Military Coo

Military Coo

prehensive A

lusions .........

MPREHENS....................

P - The frame

Key policies a

nstitutions an

an and Milita

ons Learned

ning and Con

Early warning

Planning and

Command an

nformation sh

inance and P

Training .........

tary Synergie


....................

....................

Y .................

....................

....................

eliverable .....

eliverable ....

LATIONS IN

he theoretica

raction .........

peration (CIM

rdination (CM

Approach (CA

....................

SIVE APPRO....................

ework of civi

and documen

nd Actors .....

ry capabilitie

Cycle .........

nducting CSD

g and situatio

decision ma

d Control (C

haring and re

Procurement

....................

es

the European Union

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

EU CRISIS

al framework

....................

MIC) ............

MCO) ...........

A) to crisis m

....................

OACH TO C....................

l-military inte

nts relevant t

....................

es .................

....................

DP missions

onal awarene

aking .............

C2) ................

eporting .......

t ...................

....................

PU


....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

MANAGEM

for EU crisis

....................

....................

....................

management.

....................

RISIS - INTE....................

eractions with

to CSDP ......

....................

....................

....................

and operatio

ess ...............

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................


...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

ENT ............

s manageme

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

ERNAL COO...................

hin the EU ..

...................

...................

...................

...................

ons ..............

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

n programme under g

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

ent structures

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

OPERATION....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

s ..................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

N AND COO...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................


653371

iii

........ v

........ v

....... vi

..... viii

....... 9

..... 12

..... 12

..... 14

..... 14

..... 16

..... 18

..... 19

..... 21

..... 25

RDINATION..... 26

..... 26

..... 26

..... 30

..... 31

..... 35

..... 40

..... 40

..... 41

..... 46

..... 49

..... 49

..... 51

U

5 s

i

N

D1.3 Review

3.4.6 S

3.5 Civil-

3.5.1 O

3.5.2 In

3.6 Concl

4 LESSONS

4.1 Lesso

4.1.1 A

4.1.2 L

4.2 Limita

4.3 Concl

5 INTER- O

5.1 North

5.2 United

5.3 Regio

5.3.1 O

5.3.2 A

5.4 Concl

6 TOWARD

6.1 Imple

6.2 Civil-

6.3 Concl

BIBLIOGR

Key inform

Annex 1.

Annex 2.

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

Staffing .........

military inter

Overview of th

nteraction be

lusion ..........

S FROM IMP

ons learned f

Annual report

essons ident

ations to dev

lusions .........

ORGANIZATI

Atlantic Tre

d Nations (U

onal internati

Organisation

African Union

lusions .........

DS ENHANC

mentation of

Military syne

lusions .........

RAPHY .......

mant intervie

Thematic int

Lessons ide

tary Synergie


....................

raction in the

he CDSP mi

etween CSDP

....................

PLEMENTAT

from compre

ts .................

tified on CSD

eloping the c

....................

IONAL COO

aty Organisa

UN) – Europe

onal organiz

for Security a

(AU) – Euro

....................

ED COOPER

f comprehen

ergies ..........

....................

....................

ews ..............

terview ........

entified .........

es

the European Union

....................

eatre .............

ssion and op

P missions a

....................

TION OF CO

ehensive app

....................

DP civil- milit

comprehensi

....................

PERATION .

ation (NATO)

ean Union (E

zations ..........

and Co-oper

opean Union

....................

RATION AN

sive approac

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

PU


....................

....................

peration dep

and operation

....................

OMPREHENS

proach to CS

....................

tary interface

ive approach

....................

....................

)- European

U) ...............

....................

ration in Euro

(EU) ...........

....................

D COORDIN

ch in CSDP .

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................


...................

...................

loyed paralle

ns in theatre

...................

SIVE APPRO

DP ..............

...................

e ..................

h to crisis ma

...................

...................

Union (EU)

...................

...................

ope (OSCE)

...................

...................

NATION ......

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

n programme under g

....................

....................

el ..................

....................

....................

OACH TO CR

....................

....................

....................

anagement ..

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

- European

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

RISIS ..........

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

Union (EU) .

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................


653371

iv

..... 55

..... 57

..... 58

..... 64

..... 68

..... 69

..... 70

..... 70

..... 71

..... 79

..... 82

..... 83

..... 84

..... 92

..... 98

..... 98

... 102

... 106

... 107

... 108

... 111

... 112

... 113

... 127

........ I

...... III

U

5 s

v

D1.3 Review LIST OF

Table 1. De

Table 2. Co

Table 3. Ev

Table 4. Civ

Table 5. Mil

Table 6. Wh

Table 7. EU

Table 8. Th

Table 9. Ma

Table 10. In

Table 11. E

Table 12. C

Table 13. C

LIST OF

Figure 1. Im

Figure 2. EU

Figure 3. CM

Figure 4. Ci

Figure 5. Fi

Figure 6. Ph

Figure 7. Th

Figure 8. EU

Figure 9. EU

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

TABLES

efinition of CM

omprehensive

olution of ES

vilian capabil

litary capabil

ho identifies

U level trainin

e Key Lesso

ain barriers to

nstitutional ar

U and UN m

Completed an

Civil- military s

FIGURE

mproving the

U’s Compreh

MPD decisio

ivilian and M

nancing CSD

hases for Tra

he EU Crisis

U-NATO per

U – Current N

tary Synergie


S

MCO ............

e Approach-

SDP/ CSDP .

lities critical .

ities critical .

the CSDP ke

ng providers .

ons from 201

o interoperab

rrangements

missions and

nd ongoing C

synergies tha

S

EU compreh

hensive Appr

on making pro

ilitary Comm

DP Missions

aining and R

Platform .....

rmanent liaiso

NATO/EU Co

es

the European Union

....................

relevant doc

....................

....................

....................

ey lessons? .

....................

4 ..................

bility .............

s for EU-UN c

operations d

CSDP operat

at could be f

hensive appr

roach to Cris

ocedure .......

mand and Co

and Operati

ecruitment o

....................

on arrangem

ommon Area

PU


....................

cuments and

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

cooperation

deployed par

tions in Africa

further enhan

roach ...........

sis ................

....................

ontrol options

ion ...............

of CSDP Miss

....................

ments ...........

as of Deploy


...................

d concepts ...

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

rallel (in Augu

a .................

nced within C

...................

...................

...................

s ..................

...................

sions and Op

...................

...................

ment ...........

n programme under g

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

ust 2015) ....

....................

CSDP ..........

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

perations .....

....................

....................

....................

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................


653371

v

............... 20

............... 22

............... 28

............... 32

............... 33

............... 38

............... 52

............... 71

............... 81

............... 95

............... 96

............. 104

............. 111

............... 17

............... 24

............... 41

............... 47

............... 49

............... 51

............... 76

............... 86

............... 89

U

5 s

v

0

2

8

2

3

8

2

5

6

4

7

4

7

9

6

6

9

D1.3 Review EXECUT

European to its internto tackle aenhance tForeign SeEU to takinternation

Purposefuland militarEU’s confliis not aboudevelopmecombinatioand coherappropriategreatest deagency, bleveraging

This deliveproject, whcapabilitiescapabilitiesoutline thecontributininstrumentreport is tinstrument

To achieveand panelissue. As amilitary fuideologicallevel, suchinterventioconductingoperationsoperation sufficient cactors. In cooperatioincluding accommod

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

TIVE SUM

Union (EU)national coua complex che visibilityecurity Policke a leadinal security.

l coordinatiory ones, is pict manageut creating nent processon of the fulrent mannee. Promotinegree possut rather a, synchroniz

erable “Revihich aims s. This is ds and idente existing pg to the its that are that efficients that are o

e the object discussiona result, wenctions is l facets. A nh as, a lackns, a lack

g and suppos, and at oobjectives,

communicaaddition, a

on and cooareas suc

dation, War

tary Synergie


MMARY

) is a uniqueunter partnecrisis. Com

y, impact acy objectiveg role in p

on and cooperceived toment effortsnew structuses. It is all range of aer, thereby ng this culible, to resias tools ofzing, and a

iew: civil- mto enhancedone by idtify the potractices of dentificatioachieved t

nt conflict operating, if

tives set fon were cone found out

a complenumber or bk of a uniteof coordina

orting a CSoperational

absence otion system

a number oordination ch as, Strrehouses, T

es

the European Union

e actor in coers. It has v

mbining the nd efficienc

es. The Compeace-keep

operation beo be of utms. The aim

ures nor newbout ackno

available careinforcing

ture of coost seeing th

f the EU’s pplying them

military synee the effecdentifying htential for pcivil- militan of potenthrough EUprevention not integra

r this repornducted thet that coopex challeng

barriers to ind policy lination betwe

SDP missionl level, suof common

m that woulf areas whebetween Crategic Co

Transportati

PU


onflict prevevast potentia

strengths ocy of EU’s mmon Secuping operati

etween the most importa

of the civil-w mechanisowledging oapabilities ag the desirordination heir capabilpower to

m.

ergies” is a fctiveness ofhow to incrpooling andry coopera

ntial synergU’s compreh

requires pated, in a co

rt an extensereby gainieration ande with nunteroperabie among theen EU insn/ operationch as, ins

n training ald enable sere added

CSDP civiliaommunicatioon, Security


ention and cality in comof both miliinterventio

urity and Deions, confli

different EUance for themilitary coo

sms, nor abone anothend resourcered progresrequires thlities and reachieve th

first step in f the Europrease the id sharing. Ttion and cogies betwehensive appparallel depooperative a

sive desk reng a comp coordinatiomerous strlity could behe memberstitutions ann and the isufficient ca

and recruitmsecure inforvalue couldan and mon, Informy arrangem

n programme under g

crisis manabining civiliitary and cins, thereby

efence Policct preventio

U actors, nae coherenceoperation/c

bout merginger’s competes and use ss and cree interagen

esources ashe desired

the implempean UnionnteroperabiThe aim of oordination en CSDP proach. Theployment oand coordina

esearch, keprehensive on betweenructural, poe identified states whe

nd with parssue of fundapabilities tment standarmation shad be achievilitary functation shar

ments, Comm

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

gement in can and miliivilian capay supportincy (CSDP) eon and str

amely betwe and effici

coordinationg respectivtences, idethem in a c

eate synergncy membs belongingoutcome b

mentation of n’s conflict ility of resof this delivewithin CSDcivilians a

e prerequisof military aative manne

ey informantunderstand

n the EU’s olitical, tecat politica

en it comesrtners whending the mito reach thards and aaring betweved throughtions werering/dialogumon Medic


653371

vi

comparisontary means

abilities cang the EU’senables therengthening

een civilianency of the

n imperativee capabilityntifying thecoordinatedgies whereers, to the to a singleby sharing,

the IECEUprevention

ources anderable is toDP, therebyand militarysite for thisand civilianer.

t interviewsding of thecivilian and

chnical andl- strategics to militaryn planning,issions and

he mission/a lack of aeen the EUh enhanced identified,e, Shared

cal facilities,

U

5 s

i

n s n s e g

n e e y e d e e e ,

U n d o y y s n

s e d d c y ,

d / a U d ,

d ,

D1.3 Review Common process an This deliverelevant toand coordishort-term practises fthe interacparallel. Cto cooperaChapter 5 internation

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

pre-deploynd Security

erable is divo civil- militaination prac

(operationfrom the coction betweehapter 4 dis

ation and coreviews theal actors ou

tary Synergie


yment and provision o

vided into 4ary relationsctises withinnal) confliconduct of Cen CSDP mscussed CSoordination e intra-institutlining the

es

the European Union

“on-theatrof the CSDP

4 chapters s in CSDP. n EU’s crisisct preventioSDP missio

missions anSDP’s lesso

between cutional cooexisting pra

PU


re” trainingP staff.

(Chapters 2Chapter 3

s managemon instrumons and opnd operationons learnedcivilian and peration an

actises.


g, Mutual/I

2-5). Chaptexamines t

ment structuents, in p

perations. Tns which had process a

military crisnd coordinat

n programme under g

ntegrated

ter 2 discusthe intra- inres, focusinarticular, a

This chapterave been ond key lesssis managetion betwee

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

civil-military

sses the kenstitutional cng on the inanalysing tr includes a

operating insons identifement capaen CSDP an


653371

vii

y Lessons

ey conceptscooperationnteraction inthe currentanalyses of the region

fied, relatedabilities andnd the main

U

5 s

i

s

s n n t f

n d d n

D1.3 Review

ACRONY

ACRONYM

AU BiH C2 CA CFSP CiLMA CivCom CivOpsCdrCMC CMPD CONOPS CPCC CSDP CSO

DEVCO

ECHO

EDA EEAS ELMA ESS ESDC ESDP EU del EUMC EUMS EUSR FFM FSJ HQ

HR/VP

ISB LI LL LMG MSO

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

YMS

MS

AfrBosCoCoCoCivCo

r CivCriCriCoCivCoCivDirandHuas EuEuEUEuEuEuEuEuEUEuFacFreHeHigPoInteLesLesLesMil

tary Synergie


rican Union snia and Hemmand andmprehensivmmon Fore

vilian Lessommittee for

vilian Operasis Managesis Managencept of Op

vilian Plannimmon Secu

vilian Straterectorate Ged Developmmanitarian the Europeropean Defropean Exte

UMS Lessonropean Secropean Secropean Secropean Unioropean Unio

U Military Staropean Unioct Finding Meedom, Secadquarter

gh Represelicy/Vice-Prelligence Stssons Identssons Learnssons Manaitary Strateg

es

the European Union

erzegovinad Control ve Approacheign and Sens Manager the Civilianation Commement Concement and Pperations ing and Conurity and Degic Optionseneral for In

ment Aid and Civan Commu

fence Agencernal Actionns Managemcurity Stratecurity and Dcurity and Don Delegation Military Caff on Special

Mission curity and Ju

ntative of thresident of tteering Boatified ned agement Bogic Options

PU


h ecurity Policement Applicn Aspects o

mander cept Planning Di

nduct Capaefence Polics nternational

vil Protectiounity Humancy n Service ment Applicegy Defence ColDefence Polion Committee

Representa

ustice

he Union forthe Europea

ard

oard s


cy cation of Crisis Ma

rectorate

ability cy

Cooperatio

on (formerly nitarian Aid

cation

lege icy

ative

r Foreign Afan Commiss

n programme under g

nagement

on

known Office)

ffairs and Ssion

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

Security


653371

viii

U

5 s

i

D1.3 Review MIP NATO NGO OHQ OpCdr OPCEN OPLAN OSCE PFCA PRT PSC PSOR SIAC SASE SitCen SME SOR SSR TEU UN UNSC

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

MisNoNoOpOpOpOpOrgPoProPoProSinSafSituSmStaSecTreUnUn

tary Synergie


ssion Implerth Atlantic n-Governm

peration Heaperation Comperations Ceperations Plaganisation flitical Frameovincial Reclitical and Sovisional Stangle Intelligefe and Secuuation Cent

mall and Medatement of Rcurity Secto

eaty on Euroited Nationsited Nations

es

the European Union

mentation PTreaty Org

mental Organadquartersmmander entre an for Security ework for CconstructionSecurity Comatement Of ence Analysure Environtre dium- sizedRequiremenor Reform opean Unios s Security C

PU


Plan anisation nization

and Co-opCrisis Appron Team mmittee f Requiremeses Capacit

nment

d Entreprisents

on

Council


eration in Each

ents ty

es

n programme under g

Europe

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No


653371

ix

U

5 s

x

D1.3 Review

InternationGiven the terrorism, protracted the effectsmigratory security, reresources all relevantstronger tguaranteedmultilateraand militar

The need the improvrecognisedresolution in solving cCommon objectives to ‘preservUkraine anpreventativcomprehenfragile andarray of exexternal coincluding rmeasures and civilian

1 Cornelius AGenshagen, 2 The ongoinground. In adjoint action fr3 The CSDP states discusvisibility and 4 Article 21, E326/01, 26.105 “Internationapproach”, Ecrisis-manag

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

1 INTR

nal crisis mnew threattraditional conflicts. 1

s of climateflows, illici

egional conremain undt civilian anthan ever. d by the lism and a

ry instrumen

for the incrved effectivd.3 Evolvingof the crisecurrent issuSecurity anof the EU’s

ve peace, prnd strugglesve action mnsive approd conflict-afxternal poliooperation regular polit(sanctions)

n and milita

Adebahr, The C

2011). g fight against

ddition, it is evrom various inwas on the ag

ssed how to enimpact of the

European Unio0.2012. al Cooperatio

European Comement/links-b

tary Synergie


ODUCTIO

managementts emanatin

peacekeepAs global c

e change ait trafficking

nflicts, radicder pressurd military inAs evolve

effort of anetworked

nts to be ap

eased interveness, visg crises ares in its neig

ues in the glnd Defence

s external acrevent confls in fighting may not aloach to exteffected contcies, instruinstrumentstical dialogu), EU Specry crisis ma

Comprehensiv

t Islamic Statevident that Eurternal and extgenda of the mnhance defencCSDP. on. Treaty on

on and Develommission, acce

etween-secur

es

the European Union

ON

t has undeng from fragping has fchallenges and degradg, energy

calisation ane, the case

nstruments ed crises a single nad approach,plied in a co

roperability ibility and ie putting thghbourhood lobal securie Policy (Cction as out

flicts and strtransnation

lways be pernal conflictexts. In orments and s, to actionues with thicial Represeanagement

ve Approach t

e (ISIS) in the rope’s refugeeternal securitymeeting of Couce capabilities

European Un

pment- Securessed 5 Septerity-and-develo

PU


ergone a mgile states, frequently continue to

dation of nasecurity, n

nd terrorisme for a com- be they exhave showation or a, combiningoherent and

of existing impact of te EU’s cap to a test, aity arena byCSDP) is tlined in Artrengthen intnal terrorismpossible orcts and crisrder to add

tools at itss under theird countrieentatives, dmissions un

to Crisis Mana

Middle-East he crises demany actors. uncil of the Eus, strengthen t

ion (Consolida

rity and develoember 2015, hopment_en.


major transitasymmetri

given way o rise in numatural resounatural disam, et ceteraprehensive xternal or inwn, securityactor aloneg in the besd coordinate

civilian andthe EU’s epability to cand the needy increasingnow more ticle 21, of tternational s

m and evolvr successfuses is criticadress these s disposal, e Common s and inter

disarmamennder the CS

agement in Co

has brought fonds, not only c

uropean Unionthe defence in

ated version 2

opment, conflicttps://ec.europ

n programme under g

tion over thc conflicts,

to complember and inurces, popuasters, cyba, and as e

approach mnternal policy and dev2. Instead, st possible ed manner.

d military caxternal acti

contribute tod for the EU

g the efficiencurrent th

he Treaty osecurity’. As

ving asylum ul. Thereforal for an effe

challengesranging froForeign Se

national orgnt and non-SDP.5

oncerted Weim

orces from sevcooperation be

n, December 2ndustry and im

2012), Docume

ct prevention apa.eu/europea

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

he past twoorganised

ex peace ncrease in ulation pres

ber securityeconomic anmaking optcy instrumenvelopment it can beway all av

.

apabilities inions has bo the stabilU to take a gncy and visan ever. O

on Europeans the on-go crisis havere, advancfective EU rs, the EU hom diplomaecurity Poliganisations-proliferation

mar Effort, (Sti

veral nations tetween countr

2013, when thmprove the effe

ent Number 2

and compreheaid/policies/fra


653371

9

o decades.crime, andbuilding incomplexity;ssures andy, maritimend financialimal use ofnts - is nowcannot be

enefit fromvailable civil

n CSDP forbeen widelyisation andgreater roleibility of the

One of then Union4, ising crisis in

e shown thecing a trulyresponse inhas a wide

acy and EUcy (CFSP),

s, restrictiven activities,

ftung

o the same ries, but also

e heads of ectiveness,

012/C

ensive agility-and-

U

5 s

9

. d n ; d e l f

w e m

l

r y d e e e s n e y n e U , e ,

D1.3 Review The experWar led thadopt a porather a seCSDP misleading rointernationbroad rancomprehenSince 2003operationainstrumentcomprehen

The term ‘has emergTo date, thdifferent wand militarall actors agencies, the EU’s cendeavour

Despite thcurrent insimplementmilitary fuManagemeintegrationfor a lackimplement

Being ableand politiccoordinatioincrease tTherefore, interoperabthe strengt

6 Roy H. GinsPalgrave Stu7 It was state2004, that “asordination be8 Panel of Ex9 Directorate-Civil- military

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

rience of wae EU to devolitical comet of procedsions and o

ole in peacal security.

nge of forensive appro3 the EU h

al engagemts togethernsive appro

‘comprehenged from dishere is no u

ways; varyinry actors to in crisis areas well as, comprehensr to achieve

e political wstitutional ration of conctions in ent Plannin of civil and

k of a comation of a c

e to work tocal questionon betweenthe efficien understanbility of the ths and we

sberg & Susan

udies in Europeed by Council os the Union is

etween militaryxperts (EEAS O- General for e

y coordination

tary Synergie


ar and re-evelop its ca

mmitment todures and coperations acekeeping o The logic

eign policyoach towarhas launcheent, the EUr as its paoach to crisi

nsive approscussions ouniversal deg from a sia larger uneas includitrade and esive approa

e synergies

will to strenreality, cleaomprehensi

CSDP havng Directod military ap

mprehensiveomprehens

ogether in cn. Accordin

n the civilianncy of intending the EU’s civilia

eaknesses f

n E. Penska, ean Union Poof the Europea

s pursuing a coy and civilian cOfficials), 16 Jexternal policieand the future

es

the European Union

emerged ethpabilities fo

o prevent vcapabilities are an impooperations, and princip instrumen

rds crisis med some 32U has tried articular sts managem

ach’ was non the integefinition andmple under

nderstandingng the dipleconomic inach to crisibetween m

ngthen syner separatiove approacve been mrate (CMPpproaches, e planning sive approac

oherence isng to seven and militaernational key eleme

n and militafrom a man

The Europeanlitics, 2012), 3an Union in Thomprehensivecomponents wJune 2015; Intes, Policy Depe of the EU OH

PU


hnic and poor crisis respiolent confl designed tortant instru

conflict prple behind nts. 6 CSDmanagemen2 peace misto present trength, wh

ment.

not coined igration of civd the concerstanding ofg of the neeomatic repnstruments.is, particulailitary and c

ergies betwon to civiliach to crisis

made inter PD). Despit

this new bstructure,

ch to a crisi

s however neral studiesary actors h

conflict prents enabary crisis managing civil-

n Union in Glo31-32. he European

e approach to will be requiredterview with a partment, ConHQ, (Brussels


olitical confponse withiicts. CSDPto improve

ument in CFrevention athe CSDP

DP is alsont, drawing ssions and its ability tohich is on

n EU devevilian and mpt is interprf a need toed for coordresentation. From the arly in the civilian parts

een civilianan and milis.8 Some e

alia througte being a

body has nowhich is

is.9

not only ans and evalas been re

revention aling and oanagement- military in

obal Security, t

Union Exerciscrisis managed.” EUTM Mali O

nsolidating thes, European Pa

n programme under g

licts in the n the frame

P is not a sand compl

FSP, enablinand in the is to expan an integron civilianoperations

o deploy boe of the

lopment pomilitary comreted depen

promote sydination and, humanitaroutset, a ccontext of s of EU inte

n and militatary structu

efforts to bgh the fouan importaot been ableperceived

institutionauation repocognized to

and crisis on the othinstrument

terface can

the politics of

se Concept, 93ement, a stron

Officer, 23 Sepe EU’s Crisis Marliament: 201

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

aftermath oework of CSstand-aloneete EU foreng the Uniostrengthen

nd the EU ral part ofn and militas. From theoth civilian amain featu

olicymakingmponents in nding on theynergies bed joint efforrian and de

central charaCSDP, has

erventions7.

ary parts in ures, have ridge the cndation of

ant step toe to provideto be cruc

al, but ratheorts, coopeo be importmanageme

her hand ts is crucial.n significant

impact, (Grea

329/04 MV/RMng synergy and

ptember 2015.Management S12) 10.


653371

10

of the ColdSDP, and toe policy buteign policy.on to take aning of thetoolkit to a

f the EU'sary assets. start of itsand militaryures of its

circles butthe CSDP.

e context inetween civilrts betweenevelopmentacteristic ofs been the

CSDP, thehinder the

civilian andthe Crisis

owards thee a solutioncial for the

er a culturaleration andant tools toent efforts.preventing

. Identifyingtly increase

at Britain:

M 1, 7.5. d co-

. Structures:

U

5 s

0

d o t .

a e a s . s y s

t .

n l

n t f

e

e e d s e n e

l d o .

g g e

D1.3 Review the efficiensecurity thstates, forpreventive

To contribcapabilitiescoordinatiothe emergito implemecivil- militaCompreheComprehethe need t

The reportthe plannisearched ito the impocoherent interoperabpost- Lisbo

In additioncivil- militainterventiorelations b(ECHO) ascope of tTherefore, military fuHeadquartbetween m

10 Fernanda beyond, ESDdifferent contfurther discusis argued thainterests) it isall, commit tcomplex andApproach remobilize in econsuming ininterests. As focus and effstates’ attent11 In this repoEUTM Mali a

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ncy of the reats in the

rce the comand sustai

bute to bus in CSDPon within CSing challengent it throug

ary synergieensive Appensive Appto enhance

t aims at enng of an on the areasortance of and resoubility, exploon Treaty se

n, this reporary coopens to conflic

between CSnd Developthis report this study nctions in

ters (operamission/oper

Faria discuss

DP”, ECDMP text. The apprssed in this reat in the absens difficult for ato its rapid imd fluid situationquires significevery contextn the EU contea result of po

forts towards tion and prioritort the followinand EUCAP SA

tary Synergie


EU’s interv European

mmunity to nable mann

ild up-to-daP, this repoSDP. To prges surroungh civil- mi

es, referringproach to proach is ue cooperati

nhancing unoperation as where sev‘using the f

urce efficieres key lessetting.

rt provides ration andcts. Even thSDP missiopment (DEVwill be limreviews thethe EEAS

ational leveration and o

sed in her artic

Briefing Noteroach used in eport chapter 2nce of a senseall relevant EUmplementationn makes a shcant amounts. It entails a ext, given its iolitical and ‘orga Comprehentization tends ng CSDP missAHEL Mali an

es

the European Union

ventions. Tsoil, and thlook for n

ner.

ate undersort outlinesrovide an onding the colitary coope to it as coCSDP mis

understoodon and coo

nderstandinnd mission

veral missiofull potentiaent mannesons of usin

an overviewcoordinat

hough the Cons/ operatVCO) and

mited to thee areas of

S structuresl), as well other interna

cle “What EU e, No. 71. (20

IECEU, is ba2.5 Comprehee of urgency (eU actors (institn. Even in crishared understas of human re

process of cnstitutional coganizational’ r

nsive Approacto focus on su

sions and oped EUNAVFOR

PU


The issue ce strained dew solution

standing ons current poverall undeomprehensieration/cooroperation assions andd from a “nordination

ng on how tn, as well ans and ope

al of the exir, the stung civil- mil

w of the ketion from Comprehenstions and Emore and

e examinaticooperations (political-

as, inter-ational acto

Comprehens014), the issuased on the Coensive Approae.g. crisis or ctutions and msis situations,anding and pesources, tim

coordination aomplexity and realism, and gh will be hijacuch situations.rations are revR Atalanta, EU


could not bdefence andns to maint

n EU’s effopractises oferstanding ove approacrdination. Tand coordind operationarrowed pebetween c

the Compreas how synerations havsting capab

udy also iditary assets

ey conceptsplanning tsive ApproaEU delegatmore interon of civil-n and coord- strategic institutiona

ors.

ive Approach?ue of how Coomprehensiveach (CA) to crconflict and a ember states), as for instaolicy approac

me investment and articulatio

diversity of acgiven the EU’scked by crisis . viewed; EUFOUTM Somalia

n programme under g

e more cud security btain securit

orts to expf civil- miliof the topic,ch to a crisisThe report aation, from

ns, and, therspective”

civilian and

ehensive apnergies withve been in thbilities’ to redentifies th

s in a compr

s and proceo implemeach in practtions, Comnal security-military syndination bet

level), Opal cooperat

? Challenges mprehensive

e Approach to isis managemclear perceptio) to agree on nce in Syria, h difficult. In aand expertis

n that is evectors, policiess capacity conand conflict si

OR and EUPMand EUCAP N

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

rrent, as thbudgets of tty in a cos

ploit its civitary coope, this reports and how taddresses ta perspect

hus, in th”, which em

d military fu

pproach is phin CSDP he area parespond to ahe main rehensive m

edures releventation of tise also encmission Huy functions nergies wittween the peration Cetion and c

for the EU acApproach is Conflicts and

ment.) Accordinon of threat toa joint strategtoo many int

addition, a Cose that the En more comp, instruments,nstraints, it is ituations, bec

M in Bosnia-HeNestor.


653371

11

he evolvinghe Member

st- efficient,

vil- militaryeration andt discussedthe EU triesthe topic oftive of EU’shis report,mphasisesunctions.10

practised inhave been

rallel.11 Duea crisis in abarriers tomanner in a

vant for thethe EU’s

compassesumanitarian

(FSJ), thethin CSDP.civilian andentres and

coordination

ction plan andinterpreted in Crisis (this isng to which, ito common EUgy and, aboveterests and aomprehensiveU can hardly

plex and time priorities andlikely that theause member

erzegovina,

U

5 s

g r ,

y d d s f s ,

s

n n e a o a

e s s n e .

d d n

d n s t

U e a e y e d e r

D1.3 Review

The IECEsuccessfulobjective oand coordidiscussioncreating a

The delivereview of ostate- of thcoordinatiorange of exas informa

Deliverablecoordinatiooverview fmissions abetween mas well as

In chapter aim of outlof civil- milto civil-miinstitutiona

Chapter 3 This chaptfunctions iterm (operthe condupreventingstrategic a

12 E-InternatiBlog, A EuroEurope blog,http://www.lehttps://www.fLinkedIn Gro13 The intervi14 Interviews

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

1.1 Pur

U –project civilian- m

of the IECEUination withs, we aim foundation

rable is buion-going dishe art literaton in crisis mxperts (milit

al conversat

e 1.3. buildon within Cfor those sand operatiomissions and

enablers fo

1.2 Str

2, an overvlining the imlitary interfailitary inter

alisation of C

discusses ter outlines n EU. This

rational) conuct of CSD and enab

and operatio

onal Relations

opean Think T June 29, 201

elundin.org/; Cfacebook.comoup, accessed ew template isand news from

tary Synergie


rpose of t

supports Eilitary synerU- project b

hin CSDP. Tat ensurin

for the latte

lt on existinscussion inture, as wemanagemetary and civions in pers

ds on the aCSDP. The

eeking deeons. The ded operation

or the intero

ucture of

view of the mplications ace within thraction andCSDP.

the intra- ithe institutio

s chapter fonflict prevenDP missionbling the foonal level,

s, E-Internatio

Tank for Globa5, https://isise

Civil- Military c/groups/670468 July, 2015,

s Annex 1 - Tm 2015.

es

the European Union

the delive

EU by focurgies. The sby outlining Through extng the topicer case stud

g knowledg Media inclll as policy nt missions

vilian) were son, by pho

above by inadded val

eper underseliverable os and undeperability of

the deliv

institutionaof the ‘Hun

he EU. In ad how the

institutionalonal and leg

ocuses on tntion instrum and operstering of cthe chapte

onal Relations.al Action (Blog)europe.wordprcooperation’s F65432974396https://www.li

hematic Interv

PU


erable

using on castudy ‘Civil-the key isstensive descality, accu

dies conduc

ge. Before tluding sociapaper prac

s and operaconsulted tne and ema

ntroducing tue of this standing ofoutlines theerlines the mf civilian an

verable

alisation of Cntingon’ andddition, chae interface

cooperatiogal settingsthe civil-milments, in parations. By civil- militarr will contri

.com, June 29g), June 26, 20ress.com/; LarFacebook gro

6/; Civil- Militarinkedin.com/gview.


apturing an military synues related

sk study, keuracy and cted.

he deliveraal media, bctise relatedations withinthrough semail.

the blocks particular df existing14c existing an

main institutd military fu

CSDP strucd ‘Janowitzapter 2 appe has em

on and coos relevant foitary coope

articular, anoutlining

ry coordinaibute to the

9, 2015, http://015, http://fridrs Lundin, Lelup, accessed ry Interaction agroups/810042

n programme under g

nd exploitinnergies’ conto solid civ

ey informantrelevance

ble was wrilogs and di

d to civil- mn the EU, wami- structure

of civil- mildeliverable civil- militarnd potentialtional and ounctions und

ctures is brieian’ modelsroaches theerged and

rdination pror the coorderation and alysing the some of th

ation within e latter Wor

/www.e-ir.info/e.org/blog/taglundin.com, Ju13 July, 2015

and EU Secur24.

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

ng the bestntributes to

vil- military ct interviewsof the stud

tten, a comscussions pilitary coopeas undertaked interview

litary coopeis that it p

ry synergiel areas of c

organisationder the CSD

efly discusss to the unde key conced is appli

ractises witdination of c

coordinatiocurrent prahe emergin CSDP at rking packa

/category/blogg/csdp/; ISIS Eune 26, 2015,

5, rity & Defence


653371

12

t and most the overallcooperations and paneldy, thereby

mprehensiveplatforms12,eration andken. A wide

ws13, as well

eration andprovides ans in CSDPcooperationnal barriers,DP.

sed with anderstandingepts relateded to the

thin CSDP.civil- militaryon in short-actices fromng lessonsa political-

ages of the

gs/; The Fride Europe, Isis

e Forum’s

U

5 s

2

t l

n l

y

e ,

d e l

d n P n ,

n g d e

. y -

m s - e

D1.3 Review project buithe civil- mexpert pansupport anlearned frochapter 5, namely theone of the interoperabsynergies c

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

lding on themilitary synenel discussind crisis maom coordinthe civil- m

e UN, NATOpriority arebility betwecould be de

tary Synergie


e identificatergies in CSons; utilizin

anagement. ation/coope

military coopO, OSCE aas for enha

een civilian eveloped.

es

the European Union

tion and anaSDP. The ang the expe

Chapter 4 eration betwperation andnd AU, is d

anced efficieand military

PU


alysis of theanalysis arertise of procomplemen

ween EU’s d coordinatidiscussed, aency. Chapry actors wi


e possibilitie primarily cminent civilnts chapter crisis mana

ion betweenas working pter 6 reviewithin CSDP

n programme under g

es, opportuconducted thian and mil3 by highligagement acn the CSDPwith partne

ws the main, as well as

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

nities and phrough intelitary experghting the kctors withinP and its keers is recogn findings tos areas wh


653371

13

potential forerviews andrts in peacekey lessonsn CSDP. Iney partners,nised to be

o barriers tohere further

U

5 s

3

r d e s n ,

e o r

D1.3 Review

There are armed forcfor the manproper civinfluenced Professionare a sort obetter undwith a briediscussionmanageme

There are describe thin efforts Cooperatiotwo concepmilitary milevel, whestrategic le

Based on CIMIC, CMactors in Ewhere theychapter alsmilitary cooefforts.

2.1 Devestructure

The deveHungtingto

15 See for exa(Routledge: O24/7 Joint EffSecurity Stud16 Samuel HuMassachuset17 Morris Jan18 Huntingtonin order to creand physical arranged to s

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

2 CIVIL

vast studieces should nagement ovilian contr

by two wonal Soldier: Aof blueprinterstanding ef discussi on the coent.

several cohe relationsto intercon

on (CIMIC),pts can be ssion relatereas the C

evel, also co

the availabMCO, CA) EU by outliy are usualso shortly ooperation/c

lopment oes

lopment ofon’s and Jan

ample: RobertOxon, 2009); Sffort for Stabilitdies”, (Oxford:untington, Thetts: Harvard Uowitz, A Socia

n’s model for ceate effective separation of

separate units

tary Synergie


L- MILITAR

es on civil- mbe arrange

of civil-militarol. The unorks: The SA Social ant for the inston the devon on the oncepts re

ncepts or tos between thnnect civil , and Civil- made: CIMed to coope

CMCO referovering the

ble literaturused to deining the mly applied w

outlines howoordination

of the the

f the EU’snowitzian w

t Egnell, CompSebastiaan J.ty, (Hampshire: Oxford Univee Soldier and tUniversity Presal and Politicacivil- military rearmed forces

f the military as, with limited v

es

the European Union

RY RELAT

military inteed and manary relationsnderstandinSoldier andnd Political Ptitutionalizatvelopment o

theoreticallated to ci

ools that arhe civilian aand militaMilitary Co

IC is a militeration betwrs to the inimplementa

e, this chaescribe the main differewithin the Ew the implem practices s

oretical f

s crisis maworks on civ

plex Peace OpH. Rietjens ane: Netherlandsersity Press, 2the State: Thess, 1957). l Portrait, (Gle

elations, whichs it must be unnd civilian sphvertical interac

PU


TIONS IN

rfaces.15 Thnaged withins has been ng of the d the State Portrait (196tion of the Eof the EU’sl frameworkvil- military

re used byand militaryary approacoordination tary functionween differenternal cooration of EU

pter aims ascope of tnces betwe

EU. Becausmentation osupport the

framework

anagementvil- military r

Operations andnd Myriame T.s Defence Aca

2007). e Theory and P

encoe, Ill., Freh is still referrender proper civheres.” In pracction at other t


EU CRISI

hese studien a societyhow to creeffective o(1957) fro

60) written EU’s crisis s civil- militak on civil-y relations

EU and oty sides. Twoches to cri(CMCO). A

n, which is pent actors rdination ofactions in c

at the explathe interacteen the cose CSDP isof the comp

EU’s long a

k for EU c

t structuresrelations.18 E

d Civil-Military .I.B. Bollen edademy, 2008)

Politics of Civi

ee Press, 1960ed to as the “nvilian control actical terms, ththan managem

n programme under g

IS MANAG

s have ofte. The traditate effectiveorganizationm Samuel by Morris Jmanagemeary structurmilitary intwithin pea

her internato concepts isis managA clear distiprimarily a sin the field f EU actioncrisis manag

anation of tion betweencepts, and

s an instrumrehensive aand short-te

crisis man

s have beEspecially,

Relations: Win., Managing c; Alan Collins

il-Military Rela

0). normal theory,and there mushis means thatment level. Th

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

GEMENT

en focused tional point e military fon has beeHuntington

anowitz17. Tent structureres, this chaterface folloacekeeping

tional organare usually

gement: Civinction betwsupport funat operatio

ns at the pgement.

the key coen civilian ad explainin

ment under approach therm conflict

nagement

een impactHuntington

inning the Peacivil- military coed., “Contemp

ations, (Cambr

” is based on st be ”a strict idt the civilian a

he “Janowitzia


653371

14

on how theof concern

orces underen stronglyn16 and theTheir workses. To get aapter startsowed by a

and crisis

nizations to mentionedvil- Militaryween thesection to the

onal-tacticalpolitical and

ncepts (i.e.and militaryg how andCFSP, this

hrough civil-t prevention

t

ed by the’s work has

ace, ooperation- A porary

ridge,

an idea that deological nd military is n model” of

U

5 s

4

e n r y e s a s a s

o d y e e l

d

. y d s -n

e s

D1.3 Review influenced and has thplayed a c21st centurwas that idecreasedMaintainingstates, whoit would hamilitary remanagemeunit to the

The 9/11 internationstates.20 Tsince 2003crisis manafostering thand militaralso be trcompetitivebe used pacoordinatio“Hunginton

This idea need for cinstrumentexperienceteams of challengescapacity. Dadded to o

civil- military cause for thechange of rolcivilian controofficer corps’establishmencultural barrie19 Per Martin Organisationhttp://eiop.or.20 Katherine relations in aKatherine Mo

21 Janowitz, A22 Norheim- M

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

how civil-mhus influenccentral role ry. A pre-cot would no the needg NATO aso are also aave a stron

elations haent structurcivilian dom

event impaal security

This new se3, changed agement sthe effectivery is enhancraced in the advantagearallel to mon’ within thns” institutio

has becomcomprehensts of power.e has showpeople wit

s, i.e. fillingDue to the once peace

relations alrea

e military to cale of armed fool and effectiv. This cannot

nt on civil socieers between thNorheim-Mar Fit for Purpos.at/eiop/texte/2Morton and Ja post-9/11 woorton, (Canber

A Social and PMartinsen, “M

tary Synergie


military relatced on the in the insti

ondition for ot weaken to continus the majoa part of theng voice onve also b

re, which reminant instit

acted the dy, shifting fecurity conte

the percepttructures. Ja

eness of theced by breae Europeae is its abilitilitary oneshe EU fore

onal settings

me relevant sive strateg As Norheim

wn that effeth various g immediatecomplexity e is restore

ady acknowled

arry out the tasorces, added ave use of the abe achieved tety. Accordinghe military prortinsen, “Manase”, European2010-010a.htmacinta O’Haga

orld” in Humanrra: The Austr

Political PortraManaging the C

es

the European Union

tions are apdevelopmetutionalizatideveloping

NATO. Adue the devr internatioe allies, as wn European

been charaesulted in adution.19

evelopmenfrom robusext, togethetion on the anowitz21 d

e armed forcaking down n Security ty to deploy. These exp

eign policy s to tackle a

in the contgies, plannm- Martinse

ective crisis professiona

e security gof the con

ed, but nee

dged the obstsks in changeda new set of rearmed forces chrough separa

g to ‘Janowitz ofession and thaging the Civil-n Integration om (Accessed an, “Humanitarnitarianism andralian National

ait. Civil-Military In

PU


pproached aent of the Nion of the Eg the EU’s dditionally,velopment nal militarywell as of thn Security acterized bdding a we

nt of the intst peace-keer with lessappropriate

discussed thces requirethe culturalStrategy (

y a large nuperiences hinstruments

a complex c

text of peaning and coen (2010)22

managemeal backgrogaps, whiletemporary

eds to be in

tacles that a std security envequirements tocan only be acation, due to tmodel’ the idehe rest of soc-Military Interf

online Papers (18 August 201rianism then ad civil– militaryl University, 20

nterface in the


and organizNATO and EEU’s foreignown militarthe Berlin of EU's in

y player wahe United Sissues. They the abs

ell-organized

ternational eeping towsons learnedeness of strhe same iss that the intl and structu(ESS), in wmber of diff

have led to s, thereby crisis.

ce building ommand arconcludes ent requireunds who e, at the sacrisis, civilinvolved alre

trict separatio

vironment. Jano the military pchieved by polthe inevitable eal civil-militariety. face in the EU(EIoP), Specia15) and now: Exply relations in a009), 1-7.

e EU”

n programme under g

zed in mostEU structuren security ary crisis maPlus agree

ndependentas in the inStates, who e developmence of ad military st

communitywards the s

d from CSDrictly separasue alreadyteroperabilitural barrierswhich it is ferent civiliathe need toquestioning

and stabilirrangementin his analys a quick rcan addre

ame time, an instrumeeady during

n of planning a

nowitz, arguedprofession. Aclitical integratiopolitical and sry interface, w

: Creating an al Issue Vol. 1

oring the bouna post-9/11 wo

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

t of democres. In fact, affairs durinanagement ement signet military c

nterest of Ewanted to

ment of the a clear civtructure as

y’s perceptiostabilizationDP missionate civilian ay in 1960, aty between s. This concstated tha

an capabilitio develop ag the efficie

ity operatiots that incoysis, recent response fress differenstarting to ents cannog the early

and command

d already in 19ccording to himon and educa

social impact owould be to bre

4 (2010):1,

ndaries of civiorld, ed. Jacin


653371

15

ratic states,NATO has

ng the earlycapabilitiesed in 2001capabilities.

EU memberensure thatEU’s civil-

vilian crisisa separate

on towardsn of fragiles deployedand militaryarguing that

the civilianception can

at the EU’sies that cana ‘culture ofency of the

ons and theorporate alloperational

rom flexiblent types of

build localt simply be

y phases of

d structures 960, that this m ‘proper ation of the of the military eak down

l–military ta O’Hagan &

U

5 s

5

, s y s

. r t -s e

s e d y t

n n s n f e

e l l

e f l

e f

&

D1.3 Review planning fcapabilitiesspectrum oattempts tocomprehen

Managing

Since 1999an ability tapproach. attemptingcurrent insbetween thcivil- milita

2.2 Scop

This increparticularlymilitary intprovision othe govern

A growing guidelines,activities.24

purposes atimely peawork togeundertake In additionstrategic, oeach otherconflict ma

However, tin differentit has show 23 Eva SvoboHumanitarian24 For exampAdvantages fand Thomas http://futureuATHA, “Humwith armed foaction, (2008(Accessed 7

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

for an opes to conduon its own o implemennsive appro

the interfa

9, the EU hto mix civiliUntil today to enhance

stitutional sehe Member ry structure

e of the i

eased engay for humanteraction wiof humanitanments that

number of, and best4 Civilian aand maximce buildingther on thehumanitaria

n, the activoperational r. For this reanagement.

the scope ot forms. In tiwn that in ti

oda, “The intern Policy Groupple: Thierry Tafor the United G. Weiss, (Thn.org/media/aanitarian policorces in comp8), http://www.October 2015

tary Synergie


eration. Thuct out crihas had an

nt the ‘Janooach.

ace

has shown tan and mil

y, the EU’s e the EU’s aet- up for thStates and

es.

nteraction

agement bynitarians. Ththin peace rian assistadirect them

f policymakt practicesnd military

mizing the p interventioe same thean or monit

vities of humand tactica

eason, civil-

of the interfaimes of largimes of ‘ext

raction betweep Vol. 58 (201ardy,”Military-C

Nations?” in Phe Future Unitarchive1/reportcy making for plex political emhpcrresearch.

5)

es

the European Union

e gradual sis managn impact on

owitzian app

the ambitioitary crisis ambition haability to im

he civil- militd have refle

n

y the milithe key, ove

building coance and thm. 23

kers and scfor civil-m

specialistspotential forons. This is eatre of optoring activimanitarian al level, and-military co-

ace is contege humanitaternal’ crisis

en humanitaria4): 1-3, http://w

Civilian InteracPeacebuildingted Nations Dets/Peacebuildcivil‐military comergencies”, A.org/sites/defa

PU


disintegratgement open the EU’s proach’ to th

n to strengtmanageme

as materialiplement a ttary interfac

ected on con

tary in humrarching anoncerns thee political a

cholars are military relas share ther cooperatiobecause; i

perations. ities during and militar

d even, on s-ordination

ext specificarian disastes, the intern

an and military/www.refworldctions in Multidg Challenges fevelopment SingChallengesoordination (CATHA Themaault/files/public


tion from erations alopolicy makhe civil- mil

then its roleent instrumeised as a ntruly comprece resulted nsiderations

manitarian nd widely doe tension band strategi

recognizingations in pe goals of aon, in ordeit is frequenFor instancthe first sta

ry operationsome occashas been re

c and it can ers, such asnational com

y actors: wher.org/pdfid/53ddimensional Pfor the UN Dev

System, 2015),s_FUNDS201

CIMIC) Establitic Brief Seriescations/ATHA%

n programme under g

NATO andong the w

king, which itary interfa

e as a uniquents as parumber of inehensive apfrom struggs rather tha

crises hasocumented etween thec objectives

g the urgenpeace buildavoiding tener to achievnt that militace, a civiliaage of post-ns may affesions, haveecognized a

take place s an earthqmmunity ha

re do we go frod0c2fb4.pdf (Aeace Operatiovelopment Sys, 27 -37. 5.pdf (Accessshing a policys: outlining ba%20Thematic%

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

d EU’s strwhole civilia

nowadays ace, by dev

ue strategicrt of a comnstitutional pproach. Hogles and coan developin

s been cochallenge f

e neutral ans of military

nt need for ding and snsions andve more effary and civan organiza-conflict maect each o

e a negativeas a key iss

at differentquake in Haas the ability

rom here?”, PoAccessed 9 Ocons: What Co

ystem ed. Step

sed 11 Octobey framework foasic tenets of hc%20Brief%20


653371

16

rengtheningan- militaryis showing

veloping the

c actor withmprehensive

innovationsowever, theompromisesng effective

ontroversial,facing civil–nd impartial forces and

standards,stabilization conflictingfective and

vilian actorsation mightanagement.other at thee impact onsue in post-

t levels anditi or Ebola,y to employ

olicy Brief, ctober 2015) mparative

phen Browne

er 2015); or working humanitarian

0CIMIC.pdf ,

U

5 s

6

g y g e

h e s e s e

, –l

d

, n g d s t .

e n -

d , y

D1.3 Review the civilianInternationinteraction enriched b‘integrationto civil- mibe connec

Figure 1. Im

Relations b

Coexisten

Communi

Collaboratcan include

Co-operatstructures

Coordinat

Integrationstrategies

Interaction

The aim interoperab

25 Catherine WEuropean Pehttp://www.epensive%20Ap26 Jean-PhilipJochen Rehr48. 27 Måns, HanOperations, (28 “Interaction

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

n and militanal organisa between cby differentn’, it is impolitary relatioted to differ

mproving th

between civ

nce: existing

cation: sha

tion: workine joint plann

tion: differeand do not

tion: synchr

n: all relevand then w

n: any actio

of the intebility and sy Woollard, The

eacebuilding Lplo.org/assetspproach/EPLOppe Scherer, “rl and Galia Gl

nssen, Civil-M(Stockholm: Sn”, Vocabulary

tary Synergie


ary assets ations have civilian and t terms. Wortant to undons are25. Arent activitie

e EU compr

vilian and m

g in the sam

aring inform

ng alongsidning, poolin

ent actors w(necessaril

ronizing effo

vant institutork jointly to

on between

eraction beynergy, whic

e EU and the CLiaison Office (s/files/2.%20AO_CSDN_Com“Cooperation alume, (Vienna

ilitary InteractSwedish Defeny.COM, acces

es

the European Union

across a screated vamilitary fun

When using derstand whAs the pictues, such as

rehensive a

military funct

me time and

ation.

de one anotg resources

work togethely) share ov

orts for agre

tions are bowards mee

parties.28

etween civch can be d

Comprehensiv(EPLO)), ctivities/Civil%mprehensiveAand Coordinat

a: The Federal

ion in the Euronce Researchssed 18 Augus

PU


pectrum in arious concenctions. Dis

terms, suhat is mean

ure below djoint planni

pproach

tions can be

d space.

her, but nots and evalu

er as enableverall object

eed upon sh

brought togeting them.

vilian and described as

ve Approach,

%20Society%2Approach_Disction.” In the Hl Ministry of De

opean Union: Agency, 2010

st 2015, http://


a coordinaepts to desscourse desuch as ‘intent by these isplays26, dng and reso

e referred a

t necessariluating outco

ers, but aretives and st

hared purpo

gether to d

military funs:

European Pea

20Dialogue%2cussionPointsandbook on Cefence and Sp

Applying a Co0), 12 -14. /www.vocabul

n programme under g

ated or evecribe the scscribing civeroperabilityterms and w

different leveource sharin

s;27

ly towards somes togeth

e not part ofrategies.

oses.

develop com

nctions is

acebuilding Li

20Network/Pol.pdf (Accesse

CSDP Missionsports of the Re

omprehensive

ary.com/dictio

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

en integratecope and dvil- military y’, ‘coordinwhat their iels of relating.

shared purpher.

f the same

mmon obje

often refe

iaison Office, (

licy%20Meetined 3 Septembs and Operatiepublic of Aus

e Approach to

onary/interacti


653371

17

ed manner.depth of therelations isation’, andmplicationsionship can

poses. That

institutional

ectives and

rred to as

(The

ngs/Comprehber 2015) ions, ed. stria, 2015),

CSDP

on.

U

5 s

7

. e s d s n

t

l

d

s

D1.3 Review Interoperafrom otheroperate eff

Synergy: t

It would belevel of insituation. Itoutlined acoexistencas the exintegration

2.3 Civil-

The definitCrisis Manthe definitiobetween thpopulation the militarywith local a

CIMIC aimwithin the conditions crisis mana

29 Hanssen, C30 The develo2002 was oriand military aconference inof the concepof the EU Op10.1080/096631 In AJP-9, Nordination an NATO Command non-gove32 Council of CSDP/PSDCSeptember 2

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

ability: the r systems, fectively tog

the increase

e wrong to steraction dt cannot, fo

above, in pce level migxperiences of civilian a

- Military

tion of EU’snagement Oon written bhe force and to contribuy perspectivauthorities a

ms to estabarea of opfor the ach

agement op

Civil-Military Inopment of the ented towards

actors in crisisn June 2003 wpt view: Nik Hyperational Hea62839.2011.5NATO Civil-mind co-operatiomander and cernmental orgthe European

C 750, 19.12.22015)

tary Synergie


ability of syunits, or fo

gether.

ed effective

say that somepends onr example, particular, ght entail a from the Eand military

Cooperat

s CIMIC30 wOperations (by NATO31. d civil socieute to force ve that focuand civilians

blish and mperations, ihievement operations ai

nteraction in thEU CIMIC ha

s political, stras situations, inwas more orienynek, “EU cris

adquarters”, Eu556622 . ilitary Co-opern, in support oivil actors, inc

ganisations ann Union, ” Euro2014, http://dat

es

the European Union

ystems, unitorces and t

eness that re

me of the in what typebe assumecivilian relcompromis

Ebola crisisy actors can

ion (CIMI

was set in (2002) throuIt is a funct

ety. In a wayprotection

uses primas to reach th

maintain co-n order to of the missming at enh

he European Uas been markeategic and concluding the forntated at the osis managemeuropean Secu

ration (CIMIC)of the missionluding nationad agencies”.opean Union Cta.consilium.e

PU


ts, or forcesto use the

esults when

nteraction lee of relationed that coordations withse of the hus have sho

n support bo

C)

Civil-Militarugh EU Miltion and capy, CIMIC is and peacerily on forchat aim, as

-operation wcreate the

sion's purpohancing the

Union, 12 ed by two confnceptual levelsrmulation of thoperational anent after the Liurity, Vol. 20 (2

) Doctrine, (NA, between the

al population a

Concept for Eeuropa.eu/doc/


s to provideservices s

n two or mo

evels are mns is possidination is ah military oumanitarianown, at timoth actors a

ry Cooperaitary Commpability thatabout “win

e and stabile protectiona part of a

with the cive best possose. It is ane effectivene

ferences. The s, and strived he guiding prinnd tactical leveisbon Treaty: c2011): 81- 102

ATO, 2003), th

and local autho

U-led Military /document/ST

n programme under g

e services to exchange

ore functions

ore effectivble or des

always effecor political

n principles.mes, the cochieve their

tion (CIMICmittee (EUMt aims to enning the heity. Therebyn, and on tcomplex m

vilian authosible moral,n important ess of those

EU CIMIC Coto delimit the fnciples. The seels. To read mcivil- military c2. Accessed 5

he CIMIC is de

orities, as well

Operations anT-17107-2014-

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

to and acceed to enab

s work toge

ve than the osirable for tctive or wor

entities b.29 On the ooordinationr objectives

C) Concept MC) and wanhance the rearts and my, CIMIC dethe need toilitary opera

orities and p, material afeature of

e operations

onference heldfunctions betwecond EU CIM

more about thecoordination a5 August 2015

efined as “The

l as internatio

nd Missions” ,-INIT/en/pdf (A


653371

18

ept servicesble them to

ether.

others. Thethe specificrthwhile. Asbeyond theother hand,

and even.

for EU-leds based onrelationshipinds” of theerives from

o cooperateation. 32

populationsand tacticalthe EU-led

s.

d in June ween civilian MIC developmentnd the future . doi:

e co-

nal, national

17107/14, Accessed 9

U

5 s

8

s o

e c s e ,

n

d n p e

m e

s l

d

t

D1.3 Review In practicecases: tdependentresources,cooperationon-govern

DependingCIMIC-oriefunctions. similar to tLiaison, Suthe Military

EU conceppublished (EUMS), implementand for tcapacities.separationand civiliacoordinatiocooperatio

2.4 Civil-

Since adopmilitary cristhat would

33 Marjan MaUniversity of August 201534 Agata MazSpołeczeństwhttp://www.ac(Accessed 1335 To learn mhttp://www.eunceptcimic_e36 Hynek, “EU

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

e, CIMIC inthe crisis t on civilian informatio

on of the minmental org

g on the sented meas

Core functhose defineupport to thy Force. 34

pt for CIMIin 200835 which is

ing CIMIC the proced. This incl of mandatn actors inon in theaon, CIMIC ne

- Military

CMCO ‘ainvolved than seekEuropean

ption of the sis manageaddress th

alešič, Crisis M

Ljubljana, Fac)

zurkiewicz, ”NAwo Vol. 2 No. cademia.edu/93 September 2

more about theuroparl.europaen.pdf U crisis manag

tary Synergie


nteraction umanageme

n institutionon and eveilitary force ganizations.

specific cosures may ctions of ted by NATOhe Civil En

C for EU-leby Europ

s responsat the polural roles ludes coores and long

n crisis situatre, ratherevertheless

Coordina

addresses thin the planniking to put ton Union, 7 N

EU CIMIC ement capae need for e

Management inculty of Social

ATO and EU a12 ( 2014): 129638917/NAT2015)

e concept, visita.eu/meetdocs

gement after t

es

the European Union

usually takeent operatins and then security with other

.33

ontext of eassume v

he EuropeO and inclunvironment

ed military pean Unionible for itical and sfor civilia

rdinating thg-term goalations. Althr than an s represents

tion (CMC

e need for efing and subsoo much empovember 200

Concept, Ebilities, andeffective co

n the EU: Inter Sciences) htt

approach towa25 -140, TO_and_EU_A

t: s/2009_2014/

the Lisbon Tre

PU


es place inion is par

e populationor/and theinternation

each operavarious diffeean CIMIC ude Civil-Miand Suppo

operations n Military planning

strategic len and mihe plannins, and the t

hough the overall st

s an importa

CO)

ffective coorsequent implephasis on de03).

EU has decld in this respoordination o

rnational Coortp://paperroom

ards civil-milita

Approach_Tow

/documents/se

eaty”


two rtially n for re is al or

ation, erent

are litary

ort to

was Staff and

vels, litary g, commutransition oCIMIC contrategic coant operatio

rdination of thementation o

etailed structu

ared its ampect, there of actions o

rdination and m.ipsa.org/pap

ary relations in

wards_Civil-M

ede/dv/sede26

“Cithe

opethe

s

m

(C

n programme under g

nication, inf responsibcept is prim

oncept of onal compon

he action of aof the EU’s reures or proce

bition to dewas a need

of all relevan

Civil-Military Cpers/paper_26

n military oper

ilitary_Relation

60410euconce

●

vil-Military Ce co-ordinatio

all levels -components

erations and e EU, includin

and authointernation

nongoorganisation

support of the

mission along fu

CIMIC ConcManagemen

●

CSA proStart date

Duration

grant agreement No

nformation bilities betwemarily conccomplete nent of CM

all relevant Eresponse to cedures’ (Cou

evelop both d to developnt EU actor

Cooperation, (6078.pdf (Acce

rations”, Polity

ns_in_Military

eptcimic_/sede

● ●

Co-operation on and co-op- between mis of EU-led m

d civil actors eng the local porities, as we

onal, nationalgovernmentalns and agence achievememilitary

g with all otheunctions.”

cept for EU- lnt operations

● ●


653371

19

exchange,een militarycerned withinstitutionalCO.36

EU actors crisis rather uncil of the

civilian andp a concepts under the

(Ljubliana: essed 25

yka i

y_Operations

e260410euco

(CIMIC) is peration at ilitary military external to population ell as l and l cies - in ent of the

er military

ed Crisis s, 2008)

U

5 s

9

, y h l

d t

e

D1.3 Review Council. 37

which refeCSDP, as

CMCO aimlinks betweEU with exa compreh

Whereas Ctactical levis located crisis manlevel of theobjective isvarious stplanning toexercises.

Until the ethe Lisbonmost signthe EU

Comprehefrom the about 200making theThese atteparts that n

1) Comprehave a cohhow to solv

(2) Compdifferent ac

(3) Managtheatre.

37 Radek KhoDefence in th38 Civil- civil r39 Svenja PosComprehensThe EU's Co2011), 57 – 640 Bjørn OlavDefence Res41 Johannse

w: Civil- Milit

This project has re

7 In 2003 thrs both to iwell as to c

ms to coordeen the comxternal actohensive app

CIMIC is mvel of the cri

at the politnagement ce Political as to integratages of cro crisis ma40

stablishmenn Treaty, tificant conc

ensive Apprinitial discu

05 when it e CMCO c

empts led toneeded to b

ehensive Aherent undeve it.

rehensive ctors in a co

gement of O

ol. “Civil- Militahe Mediterranerefers to coopst, Towards a

sive Crisis Manmprehensive A

65. v Knutsen, Thesearch Establisen, The EU's C

tary Synergie


he EU formnternal EU

civil-civil38 co

dinate the mmmunity tooors. CMCO proach.39

ainly locatesis managetical- strateconcept (Cnd Securityte civilians risis managanagement,

nt of CMPDthe CMCO ceptual coo

oach to a cussions of

was adopconcept moo the identifbe included

Analysis: Aerstanding o

Planning:ommon plan

Operations

ary Coordinatiean. Human Seration and coWhole of Eur

nagement, (WApproach to C

e EU and the cshment, 2008Comprehensiv

es

the European Union

mulated its cprocesses

oordination

military, politols for crisisis the conc

ed at the opement operagic level, re

CMC) integry Committeeand the milgement, fro, including

D and the foconcept p

ordination

crisis. Durinthe conceted, some

ore specificfication of fiin CMCO.4

All actors inof the crisis

Aims at cnning effort

s: Aims at f

on in EU CrisiSecurity, (CIDOoordination berope Approach

Wisbaden: SpriCrisis Manage

challenges of ) 29.

ve Approach to

PU


concept for with respebetween th

tical and pos managemceptual corn

perational aations, CMCeflected in rated at the (PSC). Thlitary into thom strategtraining an

ormulation oprovided threference t

ng the perioept and un

attempts ac was madeive importan

41

nvolved mu at hand an

collecting a.

finding conc

is ManagemeOB), 121 - 13

etween differenh: Organizing nger VS, 2005

ement: Premis

f Civil-Military C

to Crisis Mana


Table 1

r Crisis Manect to civil-mhe CFSP an

olicy instrument and the

nerstone of

and CO a

he he he ic

nd

of he to

od til at e. nt

st nd

all

cepts for eff

nt”, in 6th Inter1. nt civilian actothe European5), 201; Janina

ses, Ambitions

Coordination a

agement, 57 –

CMCO

(

n programme under g

1. Definition

nagement Cmilitary coornd Commiss

ments of a e security- p

EU efforts

fective civil-

rnational Sem

ors; i.e. police Union’s and M

a Johannsen, s, Limits, (Nom

at the strategic

65.

O is referred

a culture othe procedComprehepractise the prereqeffective Eand conceas implemensuring weffective cwhole raninstrumenthat the insubject toand thus dprocessesalso concexternal a

(Janina Joha

1.3 review: civil- military synergies m6... · 2020. 2. 3. · ational cen x sion) ieceu t no...

Documents