13th february 2013 - home | step change in safety · presentation content ... • permit to work:...

M a k i n g t h e U K t h e s a f e s t p l a c e t o w o r k i n t h e w o r l d w i d e o i l a n d g a s i n d u s t r y.

Step Change Leadership Team

13th February 2013


SAFETY MOMENT

Kirsty Walker

International Association of Oil and Gas Producers (OGP) Life-Saving Rules

Kirsty Walker

Schlumberger (Chair of OGP Safety Data Sub-Committee)

PRESENTATION CONTENT

• Trends in industry data.

• OGP response.

• Learning from the OGP data: • High risk activities and categories.

• Multiple fatality incidents.

• OGP Member Company Rules.

• Rules applicability to the OGP data.

• Results.

• Guidance on Implementation.

• Conclusions.

Lost Time Injury

Frequency: company

and contractor

incidents per million

hours worked.

Total Recordable Injury

Rate: company and

contractor incidents per

million hours worked.

Fatal Accident Rate:

company and

contractors per 100

million hours worked.

TRENDS IN INDUSTRY SAFETY DATA

Hours worked company and contractor (millions).

FATALITY AND HIGH POTENTIAL EVENT WORKSHOP

WORKSHOP OUTCOMES

• Common trends identified in the causes of fatal incidents.

• Value in developing a standard set of industry life-saving rules.

• It was agreed the rules should:

• Use simple standardised text and icons.

• Focus on hazards most likely to result in fatalities.

• Focus on actions that could be taken by the worker.

• Focus on prevention and mitigation actions.

• Build on OGP data analysis and member company experience.

• Be able to be used as a new program or supplement existing programs.

• Enable disciplinary action to be taken.

• Core rules to apply to > 40% of OGP reported fatal incidents.

• Full set of rules to apply to > 60% of OGP reported fatal incidents.

FATAL INCIDENT AND HIGH POTENTIAL EVENT CLASSIFICATIONS

Classification

categories prior to

2009

Classification categories from 2009 onwards

Incident types Category of event Type of activity

Air Transport Caught between Drowning/ Water

related Electrical Explosion/burn Fall Struck by Vehicle incident Other Unknown

Assault or Violent Act Caught In, Under or Between Confined Space Cut, Puncture, Scrape Exposure Electrical Exposure Noise, Chemical,

Biological, Vibration Explosions or burns Falls from height Overexertion / Strain Pressure Release1 Slips and Trips (at the same height) Struck By Water Related, Drowning Other

Construction, Commissioning,

Decommissioning Diving, Subsea, ROV Drilling, Work-over, Well Services Lifting, Crane, Rigging, Deck

operations Maintenance, Inspection, Testing Office, Warehouse, Accommodation,

Catering Production Operations1 Seismic / Survey operations Transport – Air Transport – Land Transport - Water, including Marine

Activity Unspecified – Other

IDENTIFICATION OF HIGH RISK ACTIVITIES AND CATEGORIES

FATALITY TO LOST TIME INJURY RATIOS BY ACTIVITY AND CATEGORY

Note: The number of LTIs is the number of fatalities plus lost work day cases.

MULTIPLE FATALITY INCIDENTS

MEMBER COMPANY RULES

• 14 companies submitted their rules for review.

• 4 to 13 rules per company, average of 10.

• Most common hazards included: • Permit to work: 86%

• Journey management: 86%

• Mechanical lifting: 71%

• Working at height: 71%

• Energy isolation: 57%

• Confined space entry: 50%

• Excavation (ground disturbance): 36%

• 31 further hazards had an associated rule, including: • Hazardous gas: 21%

• Alcohol /drugs: 14%

• Smoking: 14%

OGP APPROACH

• Use standard mandatory and prohibition icons.

• Avoid the use of text.

• Reflect findings from data analysis.

• Review common requirements from member company rules.

• Rules to be: • Easily recognisable in fatality prevention.

• Specific, enforceable and not subjective.

• Reasonable, in terms of expecting an individual to comply.

• Written to allow disciplinary action to be taken.

RULES APPLICABILITY TO DATA

%applicability of rules to fatal incident

(1991- 2010 inclusive)

% applicability of rules to fatal incidents

(1991- 2011 inclusive)

Percentage applicability of rules to

high potential events (2000-2010

inclusive)

Percentage applicability of rules to high

potential events (2000-2011 inclusive)

Data included:

• 1534 Fatal incidents resulting in 1983 fatalities, from 1991 to 2011 (inclusive).

• 1249 High Potential Events from 2000 to 2011 (inclusive).

RULES APPLICABILITY - BREAKDOWN BY RULE

The number of rules that were applicable to OGP reported: • 1534 Fatal incidents resulting in 1983 fatalities, from 1991 to 2011 (inclusive).

• 1249 High Potential Events from 2000 to 2011 (inclusive).

EXAMPLE OF RULE APPLICABILITY – CONFINED SPACE ENTRY

• 27 fatalities which were the result of 16 fatal incidents. • 9 fatal incidents killed 18 people either due to asphyxiation by

hazardous gases or a lack of oxygen. • 3 due to explosion/burn caused by flammable material/explosive

atmosphere.

RESULTS – THE RULES

• Supplement and support existing company systems and programs.

• Authority to stop work.

• Focus on modifying worker and supervisor behaviors in the workplace.

• Raise awareness of activities which are most likely to result in fatalities.

• Simple actions individuals can take to protect themselves and others.

GUIDANCE ON IMPLEMENTATION

• Commitment of senior management. • Ensure that safety systems and controls are in place to ensure that the

rules can actually be followed. • Decide on whether or not to apply disciplinary action for non-

compliance and define consequences.

• Determine organisational risks to select rules. • 8 core rules plus applicable supplemental rules.

• Develop a business case/ change management program. • Develop a communication plan and roll-out strategy.

• Customise generic materials.

• Develop performance monitoring metrics: • % of training conducted. • Monitor rule breaking. • Review of lagging indicator metrics.

• Monitor performance and report to management with improvement opportunities.

IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCES

• Guidance to clarify the rules.

• Leadership core pack.

• Contractor leadership engagement packs.

• Speaker support pack.

• Induction slide pack (with accompanying speaker support pack).

• Toolbox talk series and Toolbox flip-over instructions.

• Work Cards.

• Supporting data on the applicability of the rules.

CONCLUSIONS

• Value in providing clear, simple and consistent communication regarding significant risks in the workplace.

• Large potential benefit in standardising rules across the industry.

• Use as part of a safety management system to supplement and support existing company management systems, programs and policies.

• Worker compliance alone is not enough.

• Well designed and effectively implemented workplace control measures may provide the last barrier in preventing fatalities.


COMPETENCE

Martin Rune Pedersen

Rod Buchan

22

Co Chairs

Martin Pedersen

Rod Buchan

HSE

TBA

OPITO

Graham Gall

ECITB

Susan Smart

Standard Framework

Liz Thornton

Isolations

Derrick Lane

Safety Leadership

Kelly Fordham

Jim Trodden

Kirsty Walker

Step Change Support

Les Linklater

Emily Taylor

Competence Steering Group

Competence is

“Consistent demonstration and application of current skills, knowledge and attitude against a defined standard over a period of time”

• Standard definition agreed at Workshop in December

• Forms foundation to build standard framework

23

ESR Additional Training

Module Date Status Confirmed Pending

1- Major Accident Hazards 18/19 Feb FULL 12 3

2 - Risk Analysis 25/26 Feb FULL 12 1

3 - Root Cause Analysis 27/28 Feb 8 7

4 - Inspect/Audit/Communicate 13/14 Mar 7 6

24

Elected Safety Rep training now up and running

Performing Authority Training

• Aimed at construction workforce but poor take up so far Taught - 83

CBT - 121

• 3 training providers in place

• RMT report that members asked to be inappropriate PA’s

• Is this an issue for Construction Contractors?

• Relaunch standard and promote training?

25

Safety Coaching Research

• Proposed interview based study by Prof Jonathan Passmore

– What is impact of safety coaching?

– What factors contribute to improved safety outcomes?

• Report in September

• Opportunity to update existing SCIS guidance

• Request for 15 companies to participate

26


HUMAN FACTORS

Bob Fennell

Dave Stewart

Background and Journey

28

First Steps

• Raised the profile of Human Factors

• Increased awareness of various aspects of Human Factors

• Identified People, Process & Plant

• Adopted a case study approach

• Note: SCiS Share Fair straw poll revealed that 50% of the

audience had heard about First Steps and of that group only 50% had read or taken action on the publication.

29

So What?

30

Awareness, Assessment, Action

31


32


Insert questions Tool bar The so what peice

33


40

80 20

60

Usability Technic

al

Accurac

y

Accessibilit

y

Readability

34


Summary and Request

35

1. Sound strategy for progression from First Steps

2. An evolved and well received tool

3. Very well received scoring mechanism (dashboard dials)

4. Well developed and engaged working group

5. Process questionnaires complete

6. People, plant and incident investigation question sets under development

– Request – Funds to formalise and capture the assessment tool in HTML are

not available in the SCiS budget.


WORKFORCE ENGAGEMENT

Ian Sharp

Mike Bowyer

Agreed Targets

• 100% of SCLT1 to have undertaken survey before 19 June 2013

• 50% of worksites2 surveyed by Dec 2013

Notes

1. Based on those who can complete survey

2. Manned installations

69

Workforce Engagement Dashboard

% companies with registered champions % sites surveyed

% leadership team completed survey

NOTE 1. Based on SCiS Membership 2. Based on 131 manned installations

(source DECC) + n MODUs / Vessels 3. Based on 25 members of the leadership

team being able to complete surveys

48

22

SCLT – Completed Surveys

Alan Johnstone AMEC n

Geoff Holmes Talisman n

George Hubbard BG Group n

Pat Sibille Franks International n

Darren Sutherland Prospector Offshore Drilling n

Dave Goodwill BP n

Eric Sirgo Chevron n

Martin Ellins KCA Deutag n

Eddie Perkins North Star Shipping n

Ian Russell Sodexo n

Crawford Anderson Baker Hughes n

Ian Jack Schlumberger n

Alan Chesterman Apache y

Rod Buchan Cosalt y

David Forsyth Bibby Offshore y

Ian Sharp Fairfield Energy y

Martin R Pedersen Maersk Oil y

Ken Robertson Shell y

Phillipe Guys Total y

Adrian Rose Transocean y

Richard Tocher ConocoPhillips y

Bob Fennell Nexen y

Steph McNeill Subsea 7 y

Dave Stewart Wood Group PSN y

Steve Bullock Petrofac y

Piper 25 Workforce Involvement Day 19 June 2013

41

• Jointly organised by Step Change and HSE

• Sponsor group: Workforce Engagement co-chairs, HSE, RMT

• Steering group: SCiS Workforce Engagement & OIAC WIG

• Objectives:

• Bringing offshore & onshore together. An event driven by the workforce, for the workforce (500 delegates)

• Highlight workforce engagement

• Provide interactive opportunities

• Themes:

• Remembering and refreshing

• Continuous improvement

• Workforce Engagement Participation and Challenge

Draft agenda

• Introduction by ESRs

• Time Out for Piper (25 min video)

• Reflection on the past

• Where are we now and what have we learned?

• Breakout sessions (10 booths)

42

Budget

43

• Costs in excess £80,000.

• Sponsorship

• Principal Sponsor (25k) – Apache

• 2 x Supporting Sponsors (15k) – TBC

• Transport Sponsor (5k) - TBC


ASSET INTEGRITY

Geoff Holmes

Steve Bullock

Our Performance

226 219

233 234

270

241 230

269 265

209

173 188

157

187

166

131

65

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Minor Significant Major Target Total

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR

2012

YTD Performance

50% reduction target (not to exceed)

Our Performance

PROPOSAL TO OVERHAUL THE HSE HYDROCARBON RELEASE DATABASE & ASSOCIATED FORMS

Gary Begg Hydrocarbon Release Prevention Workgroup

Background

• The current HCR database maintained by the HSE was put in place over 20 years ago

• There has been a Step Change improvement project ongoing using a secondee from Nexen

• Working with the HSE to analyse the structure of the HCR database and associated OIR 12 form

• Assessment of elements missing e.g. cause data & trending while minimising the questions on the form

• Separate work stream by Energy Institute

48

What do we need?

• Good quality data, including:

– Demonstrable good investigations

– Root cause data

– Human Factors elements

• Consistent data provision by all Operators in the UKCS

• Regular & timely reporting capability

• Ability to identify focus areas of future initiatives and strategic decisions

49

What do we have?

• The database’s data gathering form (OIR12) no longer meets our needs by asking the right causation questions

• The form is onerous and non-mandatory – as a result, not all Operators submit data

• Reports are limited & work intensive to produce; further analysis is difficult

• As an industry, we don’t know if we are focussed on the right things to deliver performance improvements

50

What should we do?

• We need a database to suit the needs of our industry for the next 20+ years

• We need to ensure the right stakeholders are involved (HSE; DECC; O&G UK; EI) and funding is secured to deliver

• The project scope has to suit the needs of all the stakeholders, and the database/forms designed to fulfil those needs

51

What do we need today?

• Agreement that this will be a strategic deliverable for the Asset Integrity Steering Group 2013/14

• The go-ahead to secure support & funding from stakeholders to commence an initial project specification work scope

52

SADIE DATABASE

Gary Begg Hydrocarbon Release Prevention Workgroup

54

• Sponsored by the UK offshore oil and gas industry

• Used to facilitate the sharing of safety information and improve the lateral learning across the industry

• Database can be accessed via the Step Change in Safety website at: www.stepchangeinsafety.net/incidentsdiscussions/index.

SADIE

55

• Nearing the end of the three year period where industry set the target of a 50% reduction in Hydrocarbon releases

• Sustainability of these improvements is critical

• At industry level commitment has been made to share lessons and learn from each other

• Agreed at a recent Step Change leadership team and steering group meeting that we should collect "Lessons Learned", which may sign post root cause information around our 2012/2013 hydrocarbon releases and publish the information through the Step Change in Safety SADIE database

SADIE

56

• Industry graduate (Nick Hearn), currently on secondment to the Step Change team is working with industry and regulators to support improved learning from the hydrocarbon release database and associated projects

• Request for information made to all Duty Holders for further data for inclusion on SADIE in relation to HCR’s from 2012

• Work on going and awaiting returns from identified Duty Holders

SADIE


PROCESS SAFETY

Alan Johnstone

Process Safety, next steps…

• Cross sector industry event – Provisional date – June 11

– Approx 40 stakeholders (oil & gas, downstream, nuclear, chemical industries etc.)

– Facilitated dinner, engagement session

– Venue tbc

• Outcome: lateral learning, action areas going forward for SCiS


MARINE TRANSFER OF PERSONNEL

Colin Gay

Workgroup objectives

Phase 1 • Communicate any

information available to the workforce on these alternative methods of transport

• Gather and share existing good practice from operators in UKCS and comparable regions abroad

• Highlight existing legal and statutory regulations and guidance

Phase 2 • Prepare guidance on

alternative methods of transport

– Go / No Go Flowchart

– Risk Assessments

– Environmental criteria

– Procedures

– Training

– Step through the whole process

– Personnel tracking

61

Progress to Date • Draft guidelines almost completed

• Will be issued to work group (including Offshore Safety) for review by end of Wk 7

• 4 week review period

• On completion of review will be presented to OGUK steering committee for approval to publish.

• Draft document will reside on Project Place site

In Summary

• Off the Shelf guidance on marine transportation under ‘exceptional circumstances’ – this is a foreseeable event

• Guidelines are based on existing guidelines and best practice

• Flow chart guides you to a Go/No Go decision

• Suite of check lists and risk assessments included.

• Regulatory compliance may be an issue for some operators eg cranes must be LOLER compliant.


HELICOPTER SAFETY

Alan Chesterman

Communication Guidance – 14th Jan

• Outcomes – Commitment from all helicopter operators to share

‘incident’ alerts in an open and efficient manner.

• Key Principles – Incidents may be categorised:- minor, significant, major

and communicated based on categorisation – Reporting will start with RTBs, with a view to developing

effective and efficient communication channels to HSSG and beyond.

– Incidents will not be confined to RTBs when heli-operators deem importance of incident requires wider communications.

– Communications should support workforce confidence.

Basic Pro-forma Helicopter Operator

Date / Time

Aircraft Type

Location

Event Summary

It should be sent to HSSG as soon as practicable. The event summary should be two or three sentences only.


CHAPLAINCY

Gordon Craig


SUPPORT TEAM

Les Linklater

Key Dates

14 February Perspectives Event Helicopter Safety

27 March Industry Leadership Safety Breakfast

24 April UK Oil and Gas Safety Awards 2013

8 May Perspectives Event Asset Integrity

19 June Piper 25 Workforce Engagement Day

21 August Perspectives Event Competence / Human Factors

5 September OE Safety Breakfast

30 October Industry Leadership Safety Breakfast

27 November Perspectives Event Elected Safety Reps

69

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Leadership Team

Planning Day

SCLT co-chairs premeet

Workforce Engagement

Human Factors

Competence

Helicopter Safety

Asset Integrity

Events

Network Breakfast Safety awards

Network

Piper 25 Network

Offshore Europe

Breakfast Breakfast ESR

2013 CALENDAR

13 17 11 14 9 10

24 27 27 14

21

09

17

5 6 3 7 4 2

12

26 28 24

19

14 12 09 11

21 23 18 21 19

15

22

29 07

18-20

16

09

23

10

17

21

26

19

12

14

30 05 08

19

Visit Schedule

• Planning Day: Key output – Advocacy

– Commitment for SCLT members to contact / visit non-engaged members

– Support team has developed initial “match list” (send out post meeting)

– Suggest contact prior to breakfast (27 March) to encourage engagement and potential follow-up conversation

Joined-up Thinking launch pack

What will this presentation help us understand?

• What is Step Change in Safety

• What Step Change in Safety can do for us

• How Joined-up Thinking will help us

understand potential dangers within the

oil & gas industry

• a series of engagement packs

• brings together best practice in human factors, asset

integrity, competence and workforce engagement

• helps us to play our part

Joined-up Thinking – Expectations

What to expect from Joined-up Thinking

• Information packs designed to help prevent

hydrocarbon releases and improve safety will

be issued every second month

• These should be presented at safety meetings,

toolbox talks, onshore, offshore etc

February 2013

Step #1

Major Accident

Hazards & Safety

Critical Elements

April 2013

Step #2

Small Bore Tubing

June 2013

Remembering

Piper

July 2013

Step #3

Reporting &

Learning Lessons

August 2013

Step #4

Pipework

October 2013

Step #5

Control of Work

December 2013

Step #6

Joints

What can we do?

• Be prepared for the Joined-up Thinking

packs arriving, i.e. plan our safety meetings, town halls

• Tell our colleagues about Joined-up Thinking.

The more people involved, the safer our

workplace will be

• What do you think?

Three points to take home

• Step Change in Safety is a not-for-profit organisation

created by industry to help make the UK the safest

place to work in the worldwide oil & gas industry

• We are working towards reducing hydrocarbon

releases and making working in the oil & gas industry

as safe as possible

• Joined-up Thinking is a series of packs which aims to

help us play our part in reducing hydrocarbon releases

WORKING TOGETHER TO PREVENT HYDROCARBON RELEASES

13th february 2013 - home | step change in safety · presentation content ... • permit to work:...

Documents