16/9/2011ucerf3 / eq simulators workshop rsqsim jim dieterich keith richards-dinger uc riverside...

21
1 6/9/201 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

Upload: theodora-daniel

Post on 15-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

1 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

RSQSim

Jim DieterichKeith Richards-Dinger

UC Riverside

Funding: USGS NEHRPSCEC

Page 2: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

2 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

Representation of Fault Friction• Constitutive relation:

• State evolution:

• Stress evolution:

• Terms in red are additional ones due to normal stress variations (Linker and Dieterich, 1992)

• Interaction coefficients, K, calculated from the dislocation solutions of Okada, 1992

• Tectonic stressing rates derived from backslipping the model

• Numerical integration too slow for the scale of problems we would like to address

Page 3: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

3 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

Representation of Fault Friction• Constitutive relation:

• State evolution:

• Stress evolution:

State 1: nucleation State 0: locked fault

State 2: seismic slip

Page 4: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

4 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

Representation of Fault Friction• No predetermined failure stress or stress drop• Stress drop scales roughly as

Page 5: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

5 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

Representation of Fault Friction• No predetermined failure stress or stress drop• Stress drop scales roughly as

Page 6: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

6 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

Approximations to Elastodynamics

Parameters that influence the rupture process:• Slip speed during coseismic slip determined from

shear impedance considerations• Reduction of a on patches nearby to seismically

slipping patches• Stress overshoot during ruptures

Page 7: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

7 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

Effect of Overshoot on Rupture Characteristics

Large overshoot (13%)

Small overshoot (1%)

Page 8: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

8 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

Approximations to Elastodynamics Values for rupture parameters determined by comparison with fully dynamic rupture models

DYNA3D – Fully dynamic finite element simulation

RSQsim – Fast simulation

Propagation time 14.0 s

Propagation time 14.3 s

Page 9: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

9 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

Smooth Initial Stress (w/ block of higher normal stress)

Page 10: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

10 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

• Rate-strengthening (a > b) patches– Approximated as always sliding at steady-state– Distributed as

• Deep creeping extensions to major faults• Shallow creep on major faults• Entire creeping sections (e.g. SAF north of Parkfield)

– Possibly with small imbedded stick-slip patches

• More complicated mixed stick-slip and creeping areas (e.g. Hayward Fault)

Page 11: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

11 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

Penetration of slip of large events into creeping zone

Page 12: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

12 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

Fraction of moment release in creeping section

Aftershocks

Page 13: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

13 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

1989 Loma Prieta EarthquakeSimulation

Omori's law R t 1

Omori's law R t 1

Small repeating earthquakes

Page 14: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

14 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

Power-law temporal clustering

Decay of aftershocks follows Omori power law t -p with p = 0.77

Foreshocks (not shown) follow an inverse Omori decay with p = 0.92

Dieterich and Richards-Dinger, PAGEOPH, 2010

Stacked rate of seismicity relative to mainshock origin time

Page 15: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

15 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

Power-law temporal clustering

Interevent Waiting Time DistributionsCalifornia Catalog 1911 – 2010.5

Page 16: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

16 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

Power-law temporal clustering

Space – Time Distributions

Page 17: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

17 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

Earthquake cluster along San Andreas Fault

M7.3 43 aftershocks in 18.2days

All-Cal model – SCEC Simulator Comparison Project

Page 18: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

18 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

Earthquake cluster along San Andreas Fault

M6.9 Followed by 6 aftershocks in 4.8 minutes

All-Cal model – SCEC Simulator Comparison Project

Page 19: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

19 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

Earthquake cluster along San Andreas Fault

M7.2

All-Cal model – SCEC Simulator Comparison Project

Page 20: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

20 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

• slip ~2.3 - 4.0 cm

• duration ~10-40 days

• inter-event time - ~10-19 months

• simultaneous slip in different areas

• no Omori clustering

• spontaneous segmentation

Colella et al.,submitted

Colella et al.,submitted

Slow-slip events

Page 21: 16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC

21 6/9/2011 UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop

Summary or Conclusions (if appropriate or desired)