2

2013 ADC INSTALLATION INNOVATION FORUM | PAGE 2

Name Organization E-mailPhone

Gerry Vernon City Manager (J.C.) gerry.vernon@jcks.com 238-3103Ron Fehr City Manager (Manhattan) fehr@cityofmhk.com 587-2404COL William Clark Fort Riley Garrison Cdr william.j.clark1.mil@mail.mil 239-2092Ben Bennett Geary County Commissioner ben.bennett@gearycounty.org 226-5522Dave Lewis Riley County Commissioner dlewis@rileycountyks.gov 313-0781

John Armbrust Gov Mil Council John@manhattan.org776-8829

ISP Core Advisory BodyISP Core Advisory Body

Senior Advisory MemberSenior Advisory Member

Voting MembersVoting Members

• The Core Body is currently represented by Junction City, Manhattan, Geary County, Riley County, and Fort Riley.

• Role: Serves in an advisory capacity to guide and facilitate the ISP- Selects WG membership from Organization- Serves as Guides and Mentors for WG’s - Serves as a sounding board for issues raised by the WG’s- Votes whether to pursue concepts developed by the WG’s - Identifies potential topics for input into the WGs

3

2013 ADC INSTALLATION INNOVATION FORUM | PAGE 3

Working Group OverviewWorking Group Overview

Core Body

Public WorksWG

TransitWG

Human CapitalWG

RecreationWG

Emergency SvcsWG

Business Ops/ Finance/Procurement

WG

- Six Working Group topics have been initially identified- Topic Leads have been identified for each of the six WGs

4

2013 ADC INSTALLATION INNOVATION FORUM | PAGE 4

Process OverviewProcess Overview

ARFORGEN CALENDAR FY11-14

Monthly WG Meetings--in person initially…virtualmeetings once WG matured

Scheduled Bi-Monthly--meet as required

Quarterly Updates to FHRC

Inputs Outputs

Ideas for specific partnership opportunities based on:

• Strengths, Capabilities, Gaps/Weaknesses

Minutes/Notes to all members of the Core Body

Recommendations to the Core Body regarding• Mutual Aid Agreements (Service & Equip)• Bulk Purchasing Opportunities• Financial Transaction Processes & Agreements• Challenges requiring higher level emphasis

Cost Benefit Analysis of the Recommendations

Consolidated Key Recommendationsfrom the WG Meetings

Final Legal Review of Recommendations

Final Cost Benefit Analysis of Recommendations

Advice & feedback to the WG members regarding planned agreements/partnerships

New ideas for WG consideration

Minutes/Notes to all members of the Core Body& WG Member Leads

Highlights of Approved/ Recommended partnership opportunities to include:• Anticipated impacts to the stakeholders• Cost Benefit results of the partnership

Stakeholder Awareness of Partnerships

Strengthening Bonds within the CFHR

Strategic Communications to internal and externalStakeholders regarding benefits of the Partnerships