2001 apco/nena state training conference january 19, 2001

27
2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Upload: may-mccarthy

Post on 18-Dec-2015

227 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference

January 19, 2001

Page 2: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

An Antenna is :An Antenna is :

An An effective interface between the radio and free space:

Radio Antenna

Free space

For Terrestrial Communications, a antennas must be directional:

Radio

Page 3: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Terrestrial Microwave Antennas for Point-To-Point Communication

• Terrestrial microwave antennas generate a beam of RF signal to communicate between two locations.

• Point-To-Point communication depends upon a clear line of sight between two microwave antennas.

• Obstructions, such as buildings, trees or terrain interfere with the signal.

• Depending upon the location, usage and frequency, different types can be utilized.

• We will address the basic characteristics of these various types…

Page 4: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Gain

Front to Back Ratio (F/B)

Radiation Pattern Envelope

Cross-Polar Discrimination (XPD)

Return Loss (VSWR)

Interport Isolation (IPI)

Electrical Performance Parameters

Page 5: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Ga (dBi) = 10 log10 [ 4Aa /

Where:

Ga = Antenna Directive Gain (Catalog spec)

= Aperture Efficiency (50-55%)

Aa = Antenna Aperture Area

= Wavelength (speed of light / frequency)

Parabolic AntennaDirective Gain

Page 6: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Typical ParabolicTypical ParabolicAntenna Gain in dBiAntenna Gain in dBi

Antenna Diameter

Fre

qu

ency

2 ft(0.6m)

4 ft(1.2m)

6 ft(1.8m)

8 ft(2.4m)

10 ft(3.0m)

12 ft(3.7m)

15 ft(4.5m)

2 GHz 19.5 25.5 29.1 31.6 33.5 35.1 37

4 GHz 25.5 31.6 35.1 37.6 39.5 41.1 43.1

6 GHz 29.1 35.1 38.6 41.1 43.1 44.6 46.6

8 GHz 31.6 37.6 41.1 43.6 45.5 47.1 49.1

11 GHz 34.3 40.4 43.9 46.4 48.3 49.9 51.8

15 GHz 37 43.1 46.6 49.1 51 52.6 N A

18 GHz 38.6 44.6 48.2 50.7 N A N A N A

22 GHz 40.4 46.4 49.9 N A N A N A N A

38 GHz 45.1 51.1 N A N A N A N A N A

Page 7: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Radiation Pattern ConceptRadiation Pattern Concept

Antenna Under Test

Source Antenna

Antenna Test Range

Page 8: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Radiation PatternRadiation Patternabout Bore sightabout Bore sight

Page 9: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Cut Through Radiation Pattern at Cut Through Radiation Pattern at BoresightBoresight

Page 10: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Front to Back RatioFront to Back Ratio

• Ratio of the signal level at beam peak to that directed behind the antenna

• Considered in intra-system interference calculation (hop overreach)

• Expressed in dB

Page 11: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Co-Polarization and Co-Polarization and Cross-Polarization Cross-Polarization

Co-polarized antenna pattern

Azimuth AngleR

ela

tiv

e P

ow

er

X-polarized patttern

• Co-Polarization

– Where Transmit & Receive Antennas have the Same Polarization

– Either Horizontal or Vertical (HH or VV)

– In your System, The Wanted Signal

• Cross-Polarization– Where Transmit & Receive Antennas

have Different Polarizations

– Either HV or VH.

– In your System, The Unwanted Signal

XPD

Page 12: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Inter-port Isolation (IPI)Inter-port Isolation (IPI)

• Leakage of Signal Between Antenna Ports

• Internal Noise

• Expressed in dBTowards Reflector

Transmit Signal

Leakage Signal

Feed Horn

Page 13: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Voltage Standing Wave Ratio Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR)(VSWR)

• VSWR : 1.30 Reflection Coefficient : 13% (0.13)

• VSWR : 1.20 Reflection Coefficient : 9.1% (0.091)

• VSWR : 1.10 Reflection Coefficient : 4.7% (0.047)

• VSWR : 1.08 Reflection Coefficient : 3.8% (0.038)

• VSWR : 1.06 Reflection Coefficient : 2.9% (0.029)

VSWR = 1 + (Reflection Coefficient) 1 - (Reflection Coefficient)

Reflected Signal

Incident Signal

Page 14: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Return Loss Return Loss The Amount of Energy The Amount of Energy LostLost due to Reflected ( due to Reflected (Returned) Returned) SignalSignal

• RL : 17.8dB Reflection : 13% (0.13) VSWR : 1.30

• RL : 20.8dB Reflection : 9.1% (0.091) VSWR : 1.20

• RL : 26.7dB Reflection : 4.7% (0.047) VSWR : 1.10

• RL : 28.4dB Reflection : 3.8% (0.038) VSWR : 1.08

• RL : 30.7dB Reflection : 2.9% (0.029) VSWR : 1.06

RL = -20 x log (Reflection Coefficient)

Page 15: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Basic Antenna TypesBasic Antenna Types

Standard Standard Parabolic Parabolic AntennaAntenna

Shielded Shielded AntennaAntenna

GRIDPAKGRIDPAK®® AntennaAntenna

Focal Plane Focal Plane AntennaAntenna

Page 16: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

GRIDPAKGRIDPAK®® Antenna Antenna

• Grid Reflector

• Low Wind load

• Single Polarized

• Below 2.7GHz

• Shipped in Flat, Lightweight Package

Page 17: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Standard Parabolic AntennaStandard Parabolic Antenna

• Basic Antenna

• Comprised of

– Reflector

– Feed Assembly

– Mount

Page 18: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Focal Plane AntennaFocal Plane Antenna

• Deeper Reflector

• Edge Geometry

• Improved F/B Ratio

• Slightly Lower Gain

Page 19: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Shielded AntennaShielded Antenna

• Absorber-Lined Shield

• Improved Feed System

• Planar Radome

• Improved RPE

Page 20: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Antenna EfficiencyAntenna Efficiency

Well-designed antennas have efficiency ratings of 45 - 65%

Efficiency Factor Affected By :

• Feed Illumination

• Aperture Blockage

• Reflector Surface Tolerance

Efficiency can never be 100%

Page 21: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

f

D

f/D = 0.250

Antenna f/D RatioAntenna f/D Ratio

f

D

f/D = 0.333

Standard & Shielded Antennas

Focal Plane Antennas

Page 22: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Unwanted SignalsUnwanted Signals

Scattering

Diffraction

Spillover

Page 23: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Front to Back RatioFront to Back Ratio

Direction of Signal

Direction of Signal

Direction of Signal

Shielded Shielded AntennaAntenna

Focal Plane Focal Plane AntennaAntenna

Standard Parabolic Standard Parabolic Antenna Antenna

Page 24: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Parabolic Reflector BeamwidthParabolic Reflector Beamwidth

0.3 m 0.6 m 1.2 m 1.8 m 2.4 m 3 m 3.7 m 4.5 m

2 GHz 35 17.5 8.75 5.83 4.38 3.5 2.84 2.33

6 GHz 11.67 5.83 2.92 1.94 1.46 1.17 0.95 0.78

8 GHz 8.75 4.38 2.19 1.46 1 0.88 0.71 0.58

11 GHz 6.36 3.18 1.59 1 0.8 0.64 0.52 0.42

14 GHz 5 2.5 1.25 0.83 0.63 0.5 0.41 0.33

18 GHz 3.89 1.94 0.97 0.65 0.49 0.39 0.32 0.26

23 GHz 3 1.52 0.76 0.51 0.38 0.3 0.25 0.2

38 GHz 1.84 0.92 0.46 0.31 0.23 0.18 0.15 0.12

Beamwidth in Degrees

Diameter

Fre

qu

en

cy

3dB

Page 25: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 10 15 205 4060 80 100 120 140 160 180

Azimuth - Degrees from Main Lobe

An

ten

na

Dir

ecti

vity

dB

do

wn

fro

m M

ain

Lo

be

Radiation Pattern Envelope

Page 26: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Radomes

• Reduce Windloading on Tower

• Protection Against Ice, Snow and Dirt

Page 27: 2001 APCO/NENA State Training Conference January 19, 2001

Other Antenna Options

High XPD antennas

Dual beam antennas

Dual band antennas

Low profile antennas

Integrated antennas