2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

0

Project IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <http://ieee802.org/16>

Title Maintenance Task Group Session #38 Minutes

DateSubmitted

2005-07-22

Source(s) Jonathan LabsWavesat, Inc.1375 Trans-Canada HwyDorval, Qc H9P 2W8Canada

Voice: +1 514 684 0200 x325Fax: +1 514 684 0211mailto:jlabs@wavesat.com

Re: Maintenance Task Group Session #38 Minutes

Abstract Maintenance Task Group Session #38 Minutes

Purpose Maintenance Task Group Session #38 Minutes

Notice This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.16. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding onthe contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form andcontent after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material containedherein.

Release The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution,and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s nameany IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s solediscretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. Thecontributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.16.

PatentPolicy andProcedures

The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802.16 Patent Policy and Procedures<http://ieee802.org/16/ipr/patents/policy.html>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the knownuse of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder orapplicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of thestandard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard isessential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draftpublication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <mailto:chair@wirelessman.org> as early aspossible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might beincorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.16 Working Group. The Chair will disclosethis notification via the IEEE 802.16 web site <http://ieee802.org/16/ipr/patents/notices>.

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

1

Maintenance Task Group Session #37 MinutesJonathan LabsWavesat, Inc.

Maintenance Corrigendum Task GroupSession #38, San Francisco, CA

July 18, 2005Opened the TG Maintenance meeting at 4:20 PM

Reviewed procedure for the week.Reviewed agenda for the week.Motion to approve the minutes of session 37, forwarded by Ollivier Mont-Reynauld, seconded by Yossi Segal.Motion approved by unanimous voice vote.

Started comment resolution on database 80216-05_042r2.USR, Technically Binding PHY comments first (toaccommodate MAC people attending TGe and Netman).

Broke for dinner at 6:20 PM

Resumed at 7:50 PM

Motion to rule comment 119 out of scope by Ambroise, second by Ran.No discussion on the motion6 in favor4 opposefails

Generated 80216-05_042r2_temp1.USR which contains comment resolutions as of the end of the Mondayevening session. Submitted to the Temp upload server.

Broke for the night at 10:25 PM.

July 19, 2005Resumed at 8:05 AM. Resumed comments resolution on 80216-05_042r2_temp1.USR.

Broke for coffee at 10:20 AM

Resumed at 10:40 AM.

Broke for lunch at 12:10 PM.

Resumed at 1:15 PM.

Broke for ice cream at 2:40 PM.

Resumed at 2:50 PM.

John Humbert discussed his comments on Profiles, comment 523.

Vote on the comment: 17 in favor, 11 against, the comment fails. Two reasons for rejection drafted:

“The BRS band focuses on mobility and not fixed applications

The solution is incomplete since it does not address the RF profiles”

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

2

Move to delete the following reason for rejection:

"The BRS band focuses on mobility and not fixed applications"

forwarded by Zion Hadad, seconded by Yossi Segal

No discussion on the motion.

In favor: 16

Against: 8

Chair determined that the motion is technical and therefore did not pass.

Fails on grounds of not obtaining 75%

Point of order from Jim Mollenauer regarding the result of the vote on the motion. His argument is that the reasonis not technical but editorial, as the reason has no impact on the development of the text of the standard. The chairdisagreed arguing that the reason does have impact, as it will go back to the commenter, who may decided toupdated his comment or reasoning, as well as to RevCom, who will be reviewing the rejected comments anddetermine if the draft is ready for the SA committee.

Broke for coffee at 4:25 PM.

Resumed at 4:40 PM.

Broke for dinner at 6:00 PM

Resumed at 7:40 PM.

Generated 80216-05_042r2_Tue.USR which contains comment resolutions as of the end of the Tuesday eveningsession. Submitted to the Temp upload server.

Broke at 10:04 PM for the night.

July 20, 2005Started at 8:05 AM.

Continued comment resolution on database 80216-05_021r1_Tue.USR.

Broke for coffee at 10:15 AM

Resumed at 10:35 AM.

Started reviewing remaining editorial comments at 11:15 AM.

Motion: To reject all comments which suggests to put (bits) in the header, not in all cells.

forwarded by Itzik, seconded by David Castelwo

Discussion on the motion: please list the comments.037, 040, 044, 047, 0459, 067, 070, 075, 186, 196, 241, 245,259, 264, 267, 272, 277, 291, 295, 298, 306, 317, 320, 324, 330, 333, 336, 344, 352, 360, and 365.

Motion: To reject all comments which suggest to insert dashes in all empty cells in Tables.

Forwarded by Itzik, seconded by Ofer

Discussion on the motion. List the comments: 012, 039, 042, 045, 048, 060, 068, 072, 076, 098, 100, 101, 102, 187,242, 246, 260, 265, 269, 274, 278, 289, 293, 296, 299, 307, 318, 321, 326, 331, 334, 337, 346, 353, 362, 366, 371,382, 384, 446, 447, and 473.

In favor: 12

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

3

again: 0

Motion passes

Motion: To reject all comments which suggest to change alignment of columns in tables that exists in the baselinestandard..

Forwarded by Itzik, seconded by Lei Wang.

Discussion on the motion. List the comments: 038, 041, 043, 049, 058, 066, 071, 074, 185, 243, 244, 258, 263, 268,273, 276, 292, 294, 297, 305, 316, 319, 325, 328, 329, 335, 345, 351, 361, 364, 429, 430, 436, and 438.

Broke for lunch at 12:00 PM.

Resumed at 1:05 PM

Motion: To reject all remaining comments which suggest to change alignment of columns in tables that exist in thebaseline document. Forwarded by Lei, seconded Itzik.

Discussion on the motions: the specific comments are: 411, 412, 413, 417, 418, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427,428, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 437, 439, 440, 463, 472, 483, 484, and 485.

In favor: 14

against: 0

Broke for ice cream at 2:50 PM.

Resumed at 3:10 PM.

Discussion on Comment 505:

Question called by Ambroise Popper.

Motion to remove ‘no-cs’ from the standard.(by changing the value of 0 in Section 11.13.19.1 to ‘reserved’ andremoving it from section C.1.1.1.1.2) forwarded by Carl Ecklund seconded by Lei Wang.

No discussion on the motion

In favor: 7

against: 2

5:15 PM: start resolving the late comments.

Generated 80216-05_042r2_Wed.USR which contains comment resolutions as of the end of the Wednesdayevening session. Submitted to the Temp upload server.

Broke at 5:50 PM for the evening to attend the social.

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

4

July 21, 2005Resumed at 8:20AM in joint session with TGe to resolve comments for alignment between Corrigendum and 16edrafts

Resumed comments resolution in 80216-05_042r2_Wed, specifically the ones deferred for the joint session.

Broke for coffee break at 10:00 AM

Reconvened with TGe at 10:15 am for the joint session.

Generated database 80216-05_042r2_Thu.USR, and uploaded it to the local Temp directory.

Joint session ended, and broke for lunch at 12:15 PM.

Resumed at 1:35 PM.

Chair generated 80216-05_042r2_Thu_noon.USR, which contained the comment resolutions after the morningjoint session with TGe, and two late comments from Rajesh Bhalla. Uploaded it to the local Temp directory.

Continued comment resolution on 80216-05_042r2_Thu_noon.USR.

Resolving a very late editorial comment from Paul Piggen (and Darcy Poulin).

4:40 PM: Break for 20 minutes.

5:00 PM Resume to resolve comment 460 and finish with closing business.

5:15 PM Closed database and generated IEEE 802.16-05/042r3. Uploaded to the local WG directory.

Stats on IEEE 802.16-05/042r3:

– Total: 559 Late: 9

– Technical (binding): 56

– Technical (nonbinding): 137

– Editorial: 365

– Accepted/Accepted-Modified: 301

– Technical Satisfied: 16

– Rejected: 205

– Superceded: 21

– Withdrawn: 32

Reviewed the status of Disapprove votes. Asked the balloters present if they were willing to change their vote:

Balloter Sponsor Ballot Vote Updated VoteRajesh Bhalla N -James Carlo N Y*David Castelow N YMark Cudak N YMo-Han Fong N N*

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

5

Pieter-PaulGiesberts

N N*

James Gilb N Y*John Humbert N NDavid James N N*Panyuh Joo N YIvy Kelly N N*Lalit Kotecha N N*Yigal Leiba N Y*Li Li N Y*Mark Lipford N -Serge Manning N -Paul Piggin N N*Chris Seagren N N*Jung Je Son N Y*Wen Tong N N*Lei Wang N N*Mattias Wennstrom N Y*Ran Yaniv N Y*Peiying Zhu N N*Richard vanLeeuwen

N Y*

ilan zohar N Y*

26 _14 disapprove voters, 84% _ 91% approval

*notified by email (see appendix)

Discussed the schedule on finishing off the project. Current schedule:

• 2005/07/18-21 Resolve Sponsor Ballot comments at Session #38

• 2005/07/22 Conditional approval by 802 EC to forward to RevCom

• 2005/07/29 Issue Draft 802.16-2004/Cor1/D4

• 2005/08/05 Open Sponsor Ballot Recirc

• 2005/08/20 Close Sponsor Ballot Recirc

• 2005/08/12 RevCom Submittal

Updated schedule, assuming clean recirc:

• 2005/07/18-21 Resolve Sponsor Ballot comments at Session #38

• 2005/07/22 Conditional approval by 802 EC to forward to RevCom

• 2005/08/05 Issue Draft 802.16-2004/Cor1/D4

• 2005/08/08 Open Sponsor Ballot Recirc

• 2005/08/23 Close Sponsor Ballot Recirc

• 2005/08/12 RevCom Submittal

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

6

Discussed what how to handle comments if any are submitted in recirc:

straw poll: how many believe we can close off on the next recirc: 3-5

straw poll:

Ballot resolution process by email vote: 6

Ballot resolution process by representatives: 3

Proposal is to have an email ballot resolution process, to be discussed during the WG closing plenary.

Motion: To accept the database IEEE 802.16-05/042r3 as the comment resolutions to the comments from SponsorBallot 0001008.

Forwarded by: Wen Tong, seconded by: Dov Andelman

In favor:36

Against:0

Abstain:0

The motion passed.

Motion: To authorize the editor to modify the draft P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3 according the resolutions in 80216-05/042r3 to generate draft P802.16-2004/Cor1/D4.

Forwarded by: Giulio Cavalli, seconded by: Sean Cai

In favor:34

Against:0

Abstain:0

The motion passed

Motion: To authorize the chair to make the following motion at the Closing plenary: “To accept the resolutions ofcomments from Sponsor Ballot 0001008, as recorded in IEEE 802.16-05/042r3, develop draft P802.16-2004/Cor1/D4 based on those resolutions, and initiate a Sponsor Recirculation Ballot”

Forwarded by: Sean Cai

Seconded by: Wen Tong

In favor: 36

Against: 0

Abstain: 0

Motion passes.

Motion: To authorize the chair to make the following motion at the Closing plenary: “To request conditionalapproval from the LMSC EC to forward P802.16-2004/Cor1/D4 to RevCom”

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

7

Forwarded by: Giulio Cavalli

Seconded by: Remi Chayer

In favor: 30

Against: 0

Abstain: 0

Motion passes

Chair asked if there was any additional business. No new business was raised.

Motion to adjourn forwarded by Remi Chayer, seconded by Dov Andelman.

Approved by unanimous voice vote.

Adjourned at 6:05 PM.

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

8

Appendix: Email notes on Sponsor Ballot Status

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------From: Jim Carlo [j.carlo@ieee.org]Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:16 PMTo: 'Rémi Chayer'Cc: 'Jonathan Labs'Subject: RE: Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3

I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments in the comment Resolution databaseattached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip) and thereby wish to change my vote toApprove.

Jim Carlo (j.carlo@ieee.org) Phone:1-214-693-1776 Fax:1-214-853-5274J.Carlo Consulting LLC (Focus on Telecom Strategy/Standards/Patents)Past-President, IEEE Standards AssociationHuawei Consultant

================================================================================From: Rémi Chayer [mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com]Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 3:43 PMCc: 'Jonathan Labs'Subject: Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3

Dear Balloter,During the 802 Plenary Meeting in San Francisco this week, the 802.16 Working Groupthrough the Maintenance Task Group has been reviewing and resolving the comments submittedduring the Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3.

We invite you to review the resolutions for the comments that you have submitted. As youare listed as having submitted a “Disapprove” vote, we would like to know if you wouldchange your vote to “Approve” as a result of these resolutions. We would like to presentthis information to the 802 Executive Committee Meeting that will be held this Friday,July 22, in order to obtain their conditional approval to submit the document to RevCom. All you have to do is to send us (Jon Labs and I) one of the following notes: I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip) and thereby wish to change my vote to Approve. or this one: I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments X, Y, and Z... in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip but wish to retain my Disapprove vote. We need this information before the start of the 802.16 Closing Plenary on Thursdayevening, July 21. We would appreciate very much a timely consideration.

Thanks and Regards,

Remi Chayer

mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

9

Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768

at the request of Jon LabsTG Maintenance Chair

MessageFrom: Mo-Han Fong [mhfong@nortel.com]Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 1:54 AMTo: Rémi ChayerCc: jlabs@wavesat.comSubject: RE: VERY URGENT - Sponsor Ballot Disapprove Vote on 802.16-2004 Corrigendum -VERY URGENT

I am satisfied with the resolution of my comment 363 in the comment Resolution but wish to retain my Disapprove vote.

Regards,

Mo-Han

-----Original Message----- From: Rémi Chayer [mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:25 PM To: rabhalla@ztesandiego.com; david.castelow@ieee.org; Mark.Cudak@motorola.com;giesberts@motorola.com; panyuh@samsung.com; yigall@runcom.co.il; ppiggin@cygnuscom.com;lwang@cygnuscom.com; ran.yaniv@alvarion.com; Zhu, Peiying [CAR:DP10:EXCH];ilan.zohar@intel.com; j.carlo@ieee.org; mhfong@nortelnetworks.com;john.j.humbert@mail.sprint.com; dvj@alum.mit.edu; Ivy.y.kelly@mail.sprint.com;lalit.kotecha@verizonwireless.com; thomaslee@huawei.com; Mark.a.lipford@mail.sprint.com;Serge.M.Manning@mail.sprint.com; chris.e.seagren@mail.sprint.com; jungje.son@samsung.com;Tong, Wen [CAR:DP20:EXCH]; mattias.wennstrom@huawei.com Cc: jlabs@wavesat.com Subject: VERY URGENT - Sponsor Ballot Disapprove Vote on 802.16-2004 Corrigendum - VERYURGENT Importance: High

Dear Balloter,

Please, reply to an earlier e-mail I sent you yesterday concerning the sponsor ballotfor the 802.16-2004 Corrigendum. We must know not only if you are changing your vote fromDisapprove to Approve, but also which specific comments have been satisfied if you decideto maintain your Disapprove vote. This way we can define which specific comments werebehind the Disapprove votes.

Please, use the template that was provided in the earlier message. Thanks in advancefor your timely consideration and response. Best Regards,

Remi Chayer

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

10

mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com

Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768

At the request of

Jon Labs

================================================================================

From: Giesberts Pieter-Paul-apg035 [giesberts@motorola.com]Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:42 PMTo: Rémi Chayer; jlabs@wavesat.comSubject: RE: Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3

I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments 25, 27, 50, 54, 55, 57, 128, 178, 354,374, 400, 452, 475, 487, 489, 490, 508, 513 in the comment Resolution database attached tothis email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip but wish to retain my Disapprove vote. Regards, Pieter-Paul Giesberts

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------From: Rémi Chayer [mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com]Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 12:43 AMCc: 'Jonathan Labs'Subject: Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3

Dear Balloter,

During the 802 Plenary Meeting in San Francisco this week, the 802.16 Working Groupthrough the Maintenance Task Group has been reviewing and resolving the comments submittedduring the Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3.

We invite you to review the resolutions for the comments that you have submitted. As youare listed as having submitted a "Disapprove" vote, we would like to know if you wouldchange your vote to "Approve" as a result of these resolutions. We would like to presentthis information to the 802 Executive Committee Meeting that will be held this Friday,July 22, in order to obtain their conditional approval to submit the document to RevCom. All you have to do is to send us (Jon Labs and I) one of the following notes: I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip) and thereby wish to change my vote to Approve. or this one: I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments X, Y, and Z... in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip but wish to retain my Disapprove vote. We need this information before the start of the 802.16 Closing Plenary on Thursdayevening, July 21. We would appreciate very much a timely consideration.

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

11

Thanks and Regards,

Remi Chayer

mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com

Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768

at the request of Jon LabsTG Maintenance Chair================================================================================

From: James Gilb [gilb@ieee.org]Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 3:55 PMTo: Rémi ChayerCc: 'Jonathan Labs'Subject: Re: Sponsor Ballot on the draft CorrigendumP802.16-2004/Cor1/D3

Remi

I accept the resolution of all my comments and change my vote from disapprove to approve.

James Gilb

Rémi Chayer wrote:> James,>> It will be a pdf file finally. All your comments are there with the> group resolution. Only your comment #158 is missing; this editorial> binding comment was accepted.>> Best Regards,>> Remi Chayer> Wavesat Inc.> 1375 Trans-Canada Highway, Suite 300> Dorval, QC H9P 2W8> Canada> mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com> Tel.: +1 (514) 684-0200 x378> Fax: +1 (514) 684-0288> Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768>> -----Original Message-----> From: James Gilb [mailto:gilb@ieee.org]> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 2:39 PM> To: Rémi Chayer> Subject: Re: Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum> P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3>> Word files would be easier. Thanks.>> James Gilb>> Rémi Chayer wrote:

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

12

>>>You should use "Commentary" that is a dedicated software to process>>the comment database. You can download it at>>http://ieee802.org/16/docs/Commentary/ . If you prefer, I could>>extract>> the>>>information and send it to you as Word files.>>>>Regards,>>>>Remi Chayer>>Wavesat Inc.>>1375 Trans-Canada Highway, Suite 300>>Dorval, QC H9P 2W8>>Canada>>mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com>>Tel.: +1 (514) 684-0200 x378>>Fax: +1 (514) 684-0288>>Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768>>-----Original Message----->>From: James Gilb [mailto:gilb@ieee.org]>>Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 1:03 PM>>To: Rémi Chayer>>Cc: 'Jonathan Labs'>>Subject: Re: Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum>>P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3>>>>Dear Remi>>>>What application should we use to read this file?>>>>James Gilb>>>>Rémi Chayer wrote:>>>>>>>Dear Balloter,>>>>>>During the 802 Plenary Meeting in San Francisco this week, the 802.16>>>Working Group through the Maintenance Task Group has been reviewing>>>and resolving the comments submitted during the Sponsor Ballot on the>>>draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3.>>>>>>We invite you to review the resolutions for the comments that you>>>have submitted. As you are listed as having submitted a “Disapprove”>>>vote, we would like to know if you would change your vote to>>>“Approve” as a result>>>>of>>>>>>>these resolutions. We would like to present this information to the>>>802 Executive Committee Meeting that will be held this Friday, July>>>22, in>>>>order>>>>>>>to obtain their conditional approval to submit the document to RevCom.>>>

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

13

>>>All you have to do is to send us (Jon Labs and I) one of the>>>following>>>notes:>>>>>> I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments in the comment>>> Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip)>>> and thereby wish to change my vote to Approve.>>> >>> or this one:>>> >>> I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments X, Y, and Z... in>>> the comment Resolution database attached to this email>>> (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip but wish to retain my Disapprove vote.>>>>>>We need this information before the start of the 802.16 Closing>>>Plenary on Thursday evening, July 21. We would appreciate very much>>>a timely consideration.>>>>>>>>>>>>Thanks and Regards,>>>>>>>>>>>>Remi Chayer>>>>>>mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com>>>>>>Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768>>>>>>>>>>>>at the request of >>>Jon Labs>>>TG Maintenance Chair>>>>>>>>>>>================================================================================

From: David V James [dvj@alum.mit.edu]Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 11:50 AMTo: Rémi Chayer; rabhalla@ztesandiego.com; david.castelow@ieee.org;Mark.Cudak@motorola.com; giesberts@motorola.com; panyuh@samsung.com;yigall@runcom.co.il; ppiggin@cygnuscom.com; lwang@cygnuscom.com;ran.yaniv@alvarion.com; pyzhu@nortel.com; ilan.zohar@intel.com;j.carlo@ieee.org; mhfong@nortelnetworks.com;john.j.humbert@mail.sprint.com; dvj@alum.mit.edu;Ivy.y.kelly@mail.sprint.com; lalit.kotecha@verizonwireless.com;thomaslee@huawei.com; Mark.a.lipford@mail.sprint.com;Serge.M.Manning@mail.sprint.com; chris.e.seagren@mail.sprint.com;jungje.son@samsung.com; wentong@nortel.com; mattias.wennstrom@huawei.comCc: jlabs@wavesat.comSubject: Re: VERY URGENT - Sponsor Ballot Disapprove Vote on 802.16-2004Corrigendum - VERY URGENT

Rémi,

I'm sorry for the delay; I missed this yesterday.I have looked over the proposed resolutions and found most to be insufficient.

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

14

I would be happy to work closely with the editor, in an attempt to resolve the submittedcomments.I suspect that a verbal discussion would be more effective than point-counter-point emaildiscussions.

Therefore, my vote remains disapprove.

DVJ

--- Rémi Chayer <rchayer@wavesat.com> wrote:

> Dear Balloter,>> >> Please, reply to an earlier e-mail I sent you yesterday concerning the> sponsor ballot for the 802.16-2004 Corrigendum. We must know not only> if you are changing your vote from Disapprove to Approve, but also> which specific comments have been satisfied if you decide to maintain> your Disapprove vote. This way we can define which specific comments> were behind the Disapprove votes.>> >> Please, use the template that was provided in the earlier message. > Thanks in advance for your timely consideration and response. Best> Regards,>> >> Remi Chayer>> <mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com>> mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com>> Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768>> >> At the request of>> Jon Labs>> >>================================================================================

MessageFrom: Kelly, Ivy Y [NTK] [Ivy.Y.Kelly@mail.sprint.com]Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 12:14 AMTo: Rémi ChayerCc: Jonathan LabsSubject: RE: Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3

As all my comments (522, 523, 525, 552) were either rejected or withdrawn, I maintain myDisapprove vote.

Ivy Y. Kelly

-----Original Message-----

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

15

From: Rémi Chayer [mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com]Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 5:43 PMCc: 'Jonathan Labs'Subject: Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3

Dear Balloter,

During the 802 Plenary Meeting in San Francisco this week, the 802.16 Working Groupthrough the Maintenance Task Group has been reviewing and resolving the comments submittedduring the Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3.

We invite you to review the resolutions for the comments that you have submitted. As youare listed as having submitted a “Disapprove” vote, we would like to know if you wouldchange your vote to “Approve” as a result of these resolutions. We would like to presentthis information to the 802 Executive Committee Meeting that will be held this Friday,July 22, in order to obtain their conditional approval to submit the document to RevCom. All you have to do is to send us (Jon Labs and I) one of the following notes: I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip) and thereby wish to change my vote to Approve. or this one: I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments X, Y, and Z... in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip but wish to retain my Disapprove vote. We need this information before the start of the 802.16 Closing Plenary on Thursdayevening, July 21. We would appreciate very much a timely consideration.

Thanks and Regards,

Remi Chayer

mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com

Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768

at the request of Jon LabsTG Maintenance Chair================================================================================

From: Lalit.Kotecha@VerizonWireless.comSent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 11:05 PMTo: rchayer@wavesat.comCc: jlabs@wavesat.comSubject: RE: VERY URGENT - Sponsor Ballot Disapprove Vote on 802.16-2004Corrigendum - VERY URGENT

Remi,

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

16

I sent you an email yesterday. I am not satisfied with comment resolution of comment #257,so will contiue with my vote as DISAPPROVE

RegardsLalit

Remi,

I got a chance to go thorugh comment 257 and resolution. I disapproved my vote based onPAR violation and removal of section 8.4.4.7. My suggestion was to bring back sec 8.4.4.7in standard which is not in line with resolution. so, I will continue my vote asDisapprove....

Let me know if you need any further clarifications....

RegardsLalit

Lalit KotechaVerizon WirelessAdvanced Technology StrategyTel: (925)279-6597Mobile: (510)557-5537

-----Original Message-----From: Rémi Chayer [mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com]Sent: Thu 7/21/2005 5:24 PMTo: rabhalla@ztesandiego.com; david.castelow@ieee.org; Mark.Cudak@motorola.com;giesberts@motorola.com; panyuh@samsung.com; yigall@runcom.co.il; ppiggin@cygnuscom.com;lwang@cygnuscom.com; ran.yaniv@alvarion.com; pyzhu@nortel.com; ilan.zohar@intel.com;j.carlo@ieee.org; mhfong@nortelnetworks.com; john.j.humbert@mail.sprint.com;dvj@alum.mit.edu; Ivy.y.kelly@mail.sprint.com; Kotecha, Lalit ; thomaslee@huawei.com;Mark.a.lipford@mail.sprint.com; Serge.M.Manning@mail.sprint.com;chris.e.seagren@mail.sprint.com; jungje.son@samsung.com; wentong@nortel.com;mattias.wennstrom@huawei.comCc: jlabs@wavesat.comSubject: VERY URGENT - Sponsor Ballot Disapprove Vote on 802.16-2004 Corrigendum - VERYURGENT

Dear Balloter,

Please, reply to an earlier e-mail I sent you yesterday concerning the sponsor ballot forthe 802.16-2004 Corrigendum. We must know not only if you are changing your vote fromDisapprove to Approve, but also which specific comments have been satisfied if you decideto maintain your Disapprove vote. This way we can define which specific comments werebehind the Disapprove votes.

Please, use the template that was provided in the earlier message. Thanks in advance foryour timely consideration and response. Best Regards,

Remi Chayer

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

17

<mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com> mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com

Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768

At the request of

Jon Labs

================================================================================From: Jim Carlo [j.carlo@ieee.org]Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:16 PMTo: 'Rémi Chayer'Cc: 'Jonathan Labs'Subject: RE: Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3

I have asked Jim Carlo to submit this note, on behalf of myself, Thomas Li:

I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments in the comment Resolution databaseattached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip) and thereby wish to change my vote toApprove.

Jim Carlo (j.carlo@ieee.org) Phone:1-214-693-1776 Fax:1-214-853-5274J.Carlo Consulting LLC (Focus on Telecom Strategy/Standards/Patents)Past-President, IEEE Standards AssociationHuawei Consultant

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------From: Rémi Chayer [mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com]Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 3:43 PMCc: 'Jonathan Labs'Subject: Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3

Dear Balloter,During the 802 Plenary Meeting in San Francisco this week, the 802.16 Working Groupthrough the Maintenance Task Group has been reviewing and resolving the comments submittedduring the Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3.

We invite you to review the resolutions for the comments that you have submitted. As youare listed as having submitted a “Disapprove” vote, we would like to know if you wouldchange your vote to “Approve” as a result of these resolutions. We would like to presentthis information to the 802 Executive Committee Meeting that will be held this Friday,July 22, in order to obtain their conditional approval to submit the document to RevCom. All you have to do is to send us (Jon Labs and I) one of the following notes: I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip) and thereby wish to change my vote to Approve. or this one: I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments X, Y, and Z... in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip but wish to retain my Disapprove vote. We need this information before the start of the 802.16 Closing Plenary on Thursdayevening, July 21. We would appreciate very much a timely consideration.

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

18

Thanks and Regards,

Remi Chayer

mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com

Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768

at the request of Jon LabsTG Maintenance Chair================================================================================From: Paul Piggin [PPiggin@cygnuscom.com]Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 12:07 AMTo: jlabs@wavesat.comSubject: FW: VERY URGENT - Sponsor Ballot Disapprove Vote on 802.16-2004 Corrigendum -VERY URGENT

Fyi

Regards,

Paul.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Paul PigginSent: Friday, July 22, 2005 4:32 AMTo: 'Rémi Chayer'Subject: RE: VERY URGENT - Sponsor Ballot Disapprove Vote on 802.16-2004 Corrigendum -VERY URGENT

Hello Remi,

I remain a disapprove vote based on the resolution of comment 211 in Corrigendum1 of802.16-2004.

Kind regards,

Paul.

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

19

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Rémi Chayer [mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com]Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 1:30 AMTo: rabhalla@ztesandiego.com; david.castelow@ieee.org; Mark.Cudak@motorola.com;giesberts@motorola.com; panyuh@samsung.com; yigall@runcom.co.il; Paul Piggin; Lei Wang;ran.yaniv@alvarion.com; pyzhu@nortel.com; ilan.zohar@intel.com; j.carlo@ieee.org;mhfong@nortelnetworks.com; john.j.humbert@mail.sprint.com; dvj@alum.mit.edu;Ivy.y.kelly@mail.sprint.com; lalit.kotecha@verizonwireless.com; thomaslee@huawei.com;Mark.a.lipford@mail.sprint.com; Serge.M.Manning@mail.sprint.com;chris.e.seagren@mail.sprint.com; jungje.son@samsung.com; wentong@nortel.com;mattias.wennstrom@huawei.comCc: jlabs@wavesat.comSubject: VERY URGENT - Sponsor Ballot Disapprove Vote on 802.16-2004 Corrigendum - VERYURGENTImportance: High

Dear Balloter,

Please, reply to an earlier e-mail I sent you yesterday concerning the sponsor ballot forthe 802.16-2004 Corrigendum. We must know not only if you are changing your vote fromDisapprove to Approve, but also which specific comments have been satisfied if you decideto maintain your Disapprove vote. This way we can define which specific comments werebehind the Disapprove votes.

Please, use the template that was provided in the earlier message. Thanks in advance foryour timely consideration and response. Best Regards,

Remi Chayer

mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com

Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768

At the request of

Jon Labs

================================================================================

From: chris.e.seagren@mail.sprint.comSent: Friday, July 22, 2005 11:58 AMTo: rchayer@wavesat.com; rabhalla@ztesandiego.com;david.castelow@ieee.org; Mark.Cudak@motorola.com;giesberts@motorola.com; panyuh@samsung.com; yigall@runcom.co.il;ppiggin@cygnuscom.com; lwang@cygnuscom.com; ran.yaniv@alvarion.com;pyzhu@nortel.com; ilan.zohar@intel.com; j.carlo@ieee.org;mhfong@nortelnetworks.com; john.j.humbert@mail.sprint.com;dvj@alum.mit.edu; Ivy.y.kelly@mail.sprint.com;lalit.kotecha@verizonwireless.com; thomaslee@huawei.com;Mark.a.lipford@mail.sprint.com; Serge.M.Manning@mail.sprint.com;

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

20

jungje.son@samsung.com; wentong@nortel.com; mattias.wennstrom@huawei.comCc: jlabs@wavesat.comSubject: Re: VERY URGENT - Sponsor Ballot Disapprove Vote on 802.16-2004Corrigendum - VERY URGENT

None of my binding comments were incorporated, so I cannot change my vote at this time

> ------- Original Message -------> From: R?mi Chayer <rchayer@wavesat.com>> To: rabhalla@ztesandiego.com, david.castelow@ieee.org,> Mark.Cudak@motorola.com, giesberts@motorola.com, panyuh@samsung.com,> yigall@runcom.co.il, ppiggin@cygnuscom.com, lwang@cygnuscom.com,> ran.yaniv@alvarion.com, pyzhu@nortel.com, ilan.zohar@intel.com,> j.carlo@ieee.org, mhfong@nortelnetworks.com,> john.j.humbert@mail.sprint.com, dvj@alum.mit.edu,> Ivy.y.kelly@mail.sprint.com, lalit.kotecha@verizonwireless.com,> thomaslee@huawei.com, Mark.a.lipford@mail.sprint.com,> Serge.M.Manning@mail.sprint.com, chris.e.seagren@mail.sprint.com,> jungje.son@samsung.com, wentong@nortel.com,> mattias.wennstrom@huawei.com> Cc: "jlabs@wavesat.com" <jlabs@wavesat.com>> Sent: Thu 7/21/05 7:24 PM CDT> Subject: VERY URGENT - Sponsor Ballot Disapprove Vote on 802.16-2004> Corrigendum - VERY URGENT

> Dear Balloter,

>

> Please, reply to an earlier e-mail I sent you yesterday concerning the> sponsor ballot for the 802.16-2004 Corrigendum. We must know not only> if you are changing your vote from Disapprove to Approve, but also> which specific comments have been satisfied if you decide to maintain> your Disapprove vote. This way we can define which specific comments> were behind the Disapprove votes.

>

> Please, use the template that was provided in the earlier message. > Thanks in advance for your timely consideration and response. Best> Regards,

>

> Remi Chayer

> <mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com> mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com

> Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768

>

> At the request of

> Jon Labs

>

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

21

================================================================================

From: Jung Je Son [jungje.son@samsung.com]Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 2:33 AMTo: 'Rémi Chayer'Cc: jlabs@wavesat.comSubject: RE: VERY URGENT - Sponsor Ballot Disapprove Vote on 802.16-2004 Corrigendum -VERY URGENT

I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip) and thereby wish to change my vote to Approve.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Rémi Chayer [mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com]Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 9:25 AMTo: rabhalla@ztesandiego.com; david.castelow@ieee.org; Mark.Cudak@motorola.com;giesberts@motorola.com; panyuh@samsung.com; yigall@runcom.co.il; ppiggin@cygnuscom.com;lwang@cygnuscom.com; ran.yaniv@alvarion.com; pyzhu@nortel.com; ilan.zohar@intel.com;j.carlo@ieee.org; mhfong@nortelnetworks.com; john.j.humbert@mail.sprint.com;dvj@alum.mit.edu; Ivy.y.kelly@mail.sprint.com; lalit.kotecha@verizonwireless.com;thomaslee@huawei.com; Mark.a.lipford@mail.sprint.com; Serge.M.Manning@mail.sprint.com;chris.e.seagren@mail.sprint.com; jungje.son@samsung.com; wentong@nortel.com;mattias.wennstrom@huawei.comCc: jlabs@wavesat.comSubject: VERY URGENT - Sponsor Ballot Disapprove Vote on 802.16-2004 Corrigendum - VERYURGENTImportance: High

Dear Balloter,

Please, reply to an earlier e-mail I sent you yesterday concerning the sponsor ballot forthe 802.16-2004 Corrigendum. We must know not only if you are changing your vote fromDisapprove to Approve, but also which specific comments have been satisfied if you decideto maintain your Disapprove vote. This way we can define which specific comments werebehind the Disapprove votes.

Please, use the template that was provided in the earlier message. Thanks in advance foryour timely consideration and response. Best Regards,

Remi Chayer

mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com

Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768

At the request of

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

22

Jon Labs

================================================================================From: Wen Tong [wentong@nortel.com]Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 3:05 AMTo: Rémi ChayerCc: Jonathan Labs; Peiying Zhu; Mo-Han Fong; David ParanchychSubject: RE: Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3

I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments 018,019,279,280,338 in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip) and thereby wish to keep my vote to Disapprove.

Regards,Wen

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------From: Rémi Chayer [mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com]Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 6:43 PMCc: 'Jonathan Labs'Subject: Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3

Dear Balloter,

During the 802 Plenary Meeting in San Francisco this week, the 802.16 Working Groupthrough the Maintenance Task Group has been reviewing and resolving the comments submittedduring the Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3.

We invite you to review the resolutions for the comments that you have submitted. As youare listed as having submitted a “Disapprove” vote, we would like to know if you wouldchange your vote to “Approve” as a result of these resolutions. We would like to presentthis information to the 802 Executive Committee Meeting that will be held this Friday,July 22, in order to obtain their conditional approval to submit the document to RevCom. All you have to do is to send us (Jon Labs and I) one of the following notes: I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip) and thereby wish to change my vote to Approve. or this one: I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments X, Y, and Z... in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip but wish to retain my Disapprove vote. We need this information before the start of the 802.16 Closing Plenary on Thursdayevening, July 21. We would appreciate very much a timely consideration.

Thanks and Regards,

Remi Chayer

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

23

mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com

Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768

at the request of Jon LabsTG Maintenance Chair================================================================================

From: Lei Wang [LWang@cygnuscom.com]Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 7:29 PMTo: Rémi ChayerCc: jlabs@wavesat.comSubject: RE: Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3

Hi, Remi and Jon,

I am not going to change my vote on the cor1/D3 sponsor ballot, because I am not satisfiedwith the resolution of my comments #124 and #505.

Regards,

Lei

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Rémi Chayer [mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com]Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 10:01 PMCc: jlabs@wavesat.comSubject: Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3Importance: High

Dear Balloter,

During the 802 Plenary Meeting in San Francisco this week, the 802.16 Working Groupthrough the Maintenance Task Group has been reviewing and resolving the comments submittedduring the Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3.

We invite you to review the resolutions for the comments that you have submitted. As youare listed as having submitted a “Disapprove” vote, we would like to know if you wouldchange your vote to “Approve” as a result of these resolutions. We would like to presentthis information to the 802 Executive Committee Meeting that will be held this Friday,July 22, in order to obtain their conditional approval to submit the document to RevCom. All you have to do is to send us (Jon Labs and I) one of the following notes: I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip)

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

24

and thereby wish to change my vote to Approve. or this one: I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments X, Y, and Z... in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip but wish to retain my Disapprove vote. We need this information before the start of the 802.16 Closing Plenary on Thursdayevening, July 21. We would appreciate very much a timely consideration.

Thanks and Regards,

Remi Chayer

mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com

Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768

at the request of Jon LabsTG Maintenance Chair================================================================================

From: Mattias Wennstrom [mattias.wennstrom@huawei.com]Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 10:26 PMTo: Rémi ChayerCc: 'Jonathan Labs'Subject: Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3

I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip) and thereby wish to change my vote to Approve.

best regardsMattias WennstromHuawei================================================================================

From: Ran Yaniv [ran.yaniv@alvarion.com]Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 9:31 PMTo: jlabs@wavesat.com; 'R?mi Chayer'Subject: RE: VERY URGENT - Sponsor Ballot Disapprove Vote on 802.16-2004 Corrigendum -VERY URGENT

Jon,

I would like to change my vote to approve.

ThanksRan

-----Original Message----- From: rchayer@wavesat.com [mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 5:25 PM

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

25

To: rabhalla@ztesandiego.com; david.castelow@ieee.org; Mark.Cudak@motorola.com;giesberts@motorola.com; panyuh@samsung.com; yigall@runcom.co.il; ppiggin@cygnuscom.com;lwang@cygnuscom.com; Ran Yaniv; pyzhu@nortel.com; ilan.zohar@intel.com; j.carlo@ieee.org;mhfong@nortelnetworks.com; john.j.humbert@mail.sprint.com; dvj@alum.mit.edu;Ivy.y.kelly@mail.sprint.com; lalit.kotecha@verizonwireless.com; thomaslee@huawei.com;Mark.a.lipford@mail.sprint.com; Serge.M.Manning@mail.sprint.com;chris.e.seagren@mail.sprint.com; jungje.son@samsung.com; wentong@nortel.com;mattias.wennstrom@huawei.com Cc: jlabs@wavesat.com Subject: VERY URGENT - Sponsor Ballot Disapprove Vote on 802.16-2004 Corrigendum - VERYURGENT Importance: High

Dear Balloter,

Please, reply to an earlier e-mail I sent you yesterday concerning the sponsor ballotfor the 802.16-2004 Corrigendum. We must know not only if you are changing your vote fromDisapprove to Approve, but also which specific comments have been satisfied if you decideto maintain your Disapprove vote. This way we can define which specific comments werebehind the Disapprove votes.

Please, use the template that was provided in the earlier message. Thanks in advancefor your timely consideration and response. Best Regards,

Remi Chayer

mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com

Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768

At the request of

Jon Labs

================================================================================

MessageFrom: Peiying Zhu [pyzhu@nortel.com]Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 1:59 AMTo: Rémi ChayerCc: jlabs@wavesat.comSubject: RE: VERY URGENT - Sponsor Ballot Disapprove Vote on 802.16-2004 Corrigendum -VERY URGENT

Hi, Remi/John:

I am not satisfied with the resolution of my comment 340 and the resolution of comment466. Hence, I wish to retain my Disapprove vote.

Regards,

Peiying

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

26

-----Original Message----- From: Rémi Chayer [mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:25 PM To: rabhalla@ztesandiego.com; david.castelow@ieee.org; Mark.Cudak@motorola.com;giesberts@motorola.com; panyuh@samsung.com; yigall@runcom.co.il; ppiggin@cygnuscom.com;lwang@cygnuscom.com; ran.yaniv@alvarion.com; Zhu, Peiying [CAR:DP10:EXCH];ilan.zohar@intel.com; j.carlo@ieee.org; mhfong@nortelnetworks.com;john.j.humbert@mail.sprint.com; dvj@alum.mit.edu; Ivy.y.kelly@mail.sprint.com;lalit.kotecha@verizonwireless.com; thomaslee@huawei.com; Mark.a.lipford@mail.sprint.com;Serge.M.Manning@mail.sprint.com; chris.e.seagren@mail.sprint.com; jungje.son@samsung.com;Tong, Wen [CAR:DP20:EXCH]; mattias.wennstrom@huawei.com Cc: jlabs@wavesat.com Subject: VERY URGENT - Sponsor Ballot Disapprove Vote on 802.16-2004 Corrigendum - VERYURGENT Importance: High

Dear Balloter,

Please, reply to an earlier e-mail I sent you yesterday concerning the sponsor ballotfor the 802.16-2004 Corrigendum. We must know not only if you are changing your voteI amsatisfied with the resolution of my comments in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip) and thereby wish to change my vote to Approve. or this one: I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments X, Y, and Z... in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip but wish to retain my Disapprove vote. from Disapprove to Approve, but also which specific comments have been satisfied if youdecide to maintain your Disapprove vote. This way we can define which specific commentswere behind the Disapprove votes.

Please, use the template that was provided in the earlier message. Thanks in advancefor your timely consideration and response. Best Regards,

Remi Chayer

mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com

Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768

At the request of

Jon Labs

================================================================================From: van Leeuwen Richard-arv012 [rvanleeuwen@motorola.com]Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 2:55 PM

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

27

To: Rémi Chayer; 'Jonathan Labs'Subject: RE: Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3

I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments in the commentResolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip)and thereby wish to change my vote to Approve.

Regards,Richard

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------From: Rémi Chayer [mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com]Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 12:43 AMCc: 'Jonathan Labs'Subject: Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3

Dear Balloter,

During the 802 Plenary Meeting in San Francisco this week, the 802.16 Working Groupthrough the Maintenance Task Group has been reviewing and resolving the comments submittedduring the Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3.

We invite you to review the resolutions for the comments that you have submitted. As youare listed as having submitted a "Disapprove" vote, we would like to know if you wouldchange your vote to "Approve" as a result of these resolutions. We would like to presentthis information to the 802 Executive Committee Meeting that will be held this Friday,July 22, in order to obtain their conditional approval to submit the document to RevCom. All you have to do is to send us (Jon Labs and I) one of the following notes: I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip) and thereby wish to change my vote to Approve. or this one: I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments X, Y, and Z... in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip but wish to retain my Disapprove vote. We need this information before the start of the 802.16 Closing Plenary on Thursdayevening, July 21. We would appreciate very much a timely consideration.

Thanks and Regards,

Remi Chayer

mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com

Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768

at the request of Jon Labs

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

28

TG Maintenance Chair================================================================================From: Zohar, Ilan [ilan.zohar@intel.com]Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 7:30 PMTo: Rémi ChayerCc: jlabs@wavesat.comSubject: RE: Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3

Attachments: 80216-05_042r2_Wed_late.zip

Dear Remi Chayer and John Labs,

I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip) and thereby wish to change my vote to Approve.

Regards,

Ilan Zohar

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Rémi Chayer [mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com]Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 9:57 PMCc: jlabs@wavesat.comSubject: Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3Importance: High

Dear Balloter,

During the 802 Plenary Meeting in San Francisco this week, the 802.16 Working Groupthrough the Maintenance Task Group has been reviewing and resolving the comments submittedduring the Sponsor Ballot on the draft Corrigendum P802.16-2004/Cor1/D3.

We invite you to review the resolutions for the comments that you have submitted. As youare listed as having submitted a “Disapprove” vote, we would like to know if you wouldchange your vote to “Approve” as a result of these resolutions. We would like to presentthis information to the 802 Executive Committee Meeting that will be held this Friday,July 22, in order to obtain their conditional approval to submit the document to RevCom. All you have to do is to send us (Jon Labs and I) one of the following notes: I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip) and thereby wish to change my vote to Approve. or this one: I am satisfied with the resolution of my comments X, Y, and Z... in the comment Resolution database attached to this email (80216-05_042r2_Wed.zip but wish to retain my Disapprove vote.

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

29

We need this information before the start of the 802.16 Closing Plenary on Thursdayevening, July 21. We would appreciate very much a timely consideration.

Thanks and Regards,

Remi Chayer

mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com

Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768

at the request of Jon LabsTG Maintenance Chair================================================================================From: Yigal [yigall@runcom.co.il]Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 3:04 PMTo: 'Jonathan Labs'Subject: RE: VERY URGENT - Sponsor Ballot Disapprove Vote on 802.16-2004 Corrigendum -VERY URGENT

Hi Jon,

Having received the information regarding how my comment #170 was resolved, I change myvote to approve.

BR,Yigal

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------From: Jonathan Labs [mailto:jlabs@wavesat.com]Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 7:55 PMTo: rabhalla@ztesandiego.com; david.castelow@ieee.org; Mark.Cudak@motorola.com;panyuh@samsung.com; yigall@runcom.co.il; Mark.a.lipford@mail.sprint.com;Serge.M.Manning@mail.sprint.comSubject: RE: VERY URGENT - Sponsor Ballot Disapprove Vote on 802.16-2004 Corrigendum -VERY URGENT

Dear Balloter,

Please send me an email update as soon as possible on your latest status. To my record, Idid not yet receive confirmation an email note on the status of your vote.

Thanks,Jon

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: Rémi Chayer [mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:25 PM

2005-07-22 IEEE 802.16maint-05/016

30

To: rabhalla@ztesandiego.com; david.castelow@ieee.org; Mark.Cudak@motorola.com;giesberts@motorola.com; panyuh@samsung.com; yigall@runcom.co.il; ppiggin@cygnuscom.com;lwang@cygnuscom.com; ran.yaniv@alvarion.com; pyzhu@nortel.com; ilan.zohar@intel.com;j.carlo@ieee.org; mhfong@nortelnetworks.com; john.j.humbert@mail.sprint.com;dvj@alum.mit.edu; Ivy.y.kelly@mail.sprint.com; lalit.kotecha@verizonwireless.com;thomaslee@huawei.com; Mark.a.lipford@mail.sprint.com; Serge.M.Manning@mail.sprint.com;chris.e.seagren@mail.sprint.com; jungje.son@samsung.com; wentong@nortel.com;mattias.wennstrom@huawei.com Cc: jlabs@wavesat.com Subject: VERY URGENT - Sponsor Ballot Disapprove Vote on 802.16-2004 Corrigendum - VERYURGENT Importance: High

Dear Balloter,

Please, reply to an earlier e-mail I sent you yesterday concerning the sponsor ballotfor the 802.16-2004 Corrigendum. We must know not only if you are changing your vote fromDisapprove to Approve, but also which specific comments have been satisfied if you decideto maintain your Disapprove vote. This way we can define which specific comments werebehind the Disapprove votes.

Please, use the template that was provided in the earlier message. Thanks in advancefor your timely consideration and response. Best Regards,

Remi Chayer

mailto:rchayer@wavesat.com

Cell.: +1 (514) 892-4768

At the request of

Jon Labs