2009 storms, part 1

56
2009 Storms Part 1 ©2010 Fisher

Upload: mjspieglan

Post on 20-Nov-2014

667 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Presented by Al Fisher

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2009 Storms, Part 1

2009 StormsPart 1©2010 Fisher

Page 2: 2009 Storms, Part 1

Doppler Weather Radar Concepts

• Radar beam increases in altitude with distance from radar.• Radar beam increases in size with distance from radar.• Radar takes 4-5 minutes to complete full scan when in storm/precip mode.• Reliable doppler wind data limited to about 60-70 nm.• Radar velocity 100% when parallel, 0% when perpendicular to beam direction.

Page 3: 2009 Storms, Part 1

100% 100%

0%

0%

When the wind velocity is parallel to the radial, the full component of the wind is measured

When the radial is perpendicular to the the wind,

the radar displays zero velocity - This “zero zone” is

called the “Zero Isodop”.

What percentage of actual wind

will the radar detect?

00 = 100% - Parallel150 = 97%300 = 87%450 = 71%600 = 50%750 = 26%

900 = 0% - Perpendicular

The Zero Isodop “Problem”

Page 4: 2009 Storms, Part 1

Products• Base reflectivity

– how much precipitation is falling – precipitation type– assess a storm's structure and dimension

• Composite Reflectivity– Scans from all elevations, imaging precipitation intensity and storm

structure

• Base Velocity– radial wind field, speed of fronts/strong wind– range of 140 mi

• Storm relative motion– Track a circulation (show up well in doppler return) over time to

determine storm motion.– Removing the storm relative motion from base radials gives an estimate

of the flow with respect to the storm.

Page 5: 2009 Storms, Part 1

LOTHeight of beam above ground vs distance from radar. Green 10nmYellow 15nmRed 20nm

Page 6: 2009 Storms, Part 1

ORD TDWR20nm10nm

Page 7: 2009 Storms, Part 1

MDW TDWR

20nm10nm

Page 8: 2009 Storms, Part 1

What is a supercell?• Storms having deep, persistent, rotation about a vertical axis

Page 9: 2009 Storms, Part 1

• Although most significant tornadoes are associated with supercell thunderstorms, most supercells are not tornadic– What’s perhaps most troubling (from the perspective of

issuing warnings) is that most supercells contain low-level mesocyclones, and perhaps most supercells even have circulations that extend to the surface

nontornadic nontornadic tornadic nontornadic

What is a supercell?What are the biggest unanswered questions in the study of tornadogenesis?Why do storms with seemingly similar structure differ in their tornado production?

Page 10: 2009 Storms, Part 1

April 9, 2009 day 1 of 2 day storm outbreak 5PM0-6 km Shear Vector

Page 11: 2009 Storms, Part 1

0-3 km

Page 12: 2009 Storms, Part 1

0-1 km

Page 13: 2009 Storms, Part 1

0-1 km

Page 14: 2009 Storms, Part 1
Page 15: 2009 Storms, Part 1
Page 16: 2009 Storms, Part 1
Page 17: 2009 Storms, Part 1
Page 18: 2009 Storms, Part 1

KSRX Vad Winds

Page 19: 2009 Storms, Part 1

Storm Composite

Page 20: 2009 Storms, Part 1

Base Reflectivity lvl 2

Page 21: 2009 Storms, Part 1

Storm Relative Velocity lvl 2

Page 22: 2009 Storms, Part 1

Base Velocity lvl 2

Page 23: 2009 Storms, Part 1
Page 24: 2009 Storms, Part 1

April 10, 2009 2nd day of outbreak 2 PM0-6 km Shear Vector

Page 25: 2009 Storms, Part 1
Page 26: 2009 Storms, Part 1
Page 27: 2009 Storms, Part 1
Page 28: 2009 Storms, Part 1
Page 29: 2009 Storms, Part 1
Page 30: 2009 Storms, Part 1
Page 31: 2009 Storms, Part 1

Storm Composite

Page 32: 2009 Storms, Part 1

Radar HTX Base Reflectivity lvl 2 ~ 1500 ftClassic Rotating Supercell

Page 33: 2009 Storms, Part 1

Radar HTX Storm Relative Velocity lvl 2Strong Rotation Couplet

Page 34: 2009 Storms, Part 1

Radar HTX Base Reflectivity lvl 2 ~ 3200 ft

Page 35: 2009 Storms, Part 1

Radar HTX

Page 36: 2009 Storms, Part 1

HTX Base Reflectivity lvl 2 ~ 1900 ft 0.5˚

Page 37: 2009 Storms, Part 1

HTX Storm Relative Velocity lvl 2 ~ 1900 ft 0.5˚

Double Rotation?

Page 38: 2009 Storms, Part 1

HTX Base Reflectivity lvl 2 ~ 4000 ft 1.3˚

Bowing Line Tstms (L) and Classic Supercell (R)

Page 39: 2009 Storms, Part 1

HTX Base Velocity lvl 2 ~ 1900 ft 0.5˚

Page 40: 2009 Storms, Part 1

HTX Storm Relative Velocity lvl 2 ~ 4000 ft 1.3˚

Downburst (L) and Rotation Couplet (R)

Page 41: 2009 Storms, Part 1

Part of 5/8/09 Derecho 100+ mph S IL, 5 dead in MO/ KY

Page 42: 2009 Storms, Part 1
Page 43: 2009 Storms, Part 1
Page 44: 2009 Storms, Part 1
Page 45: 2009 Storms, Part 1

Tornadogenesis: Three ingredients

Development of a persistent, rotating updraft1

Ingestion of enhanced SRH (occasionally, large-scale SRH is sufficient) and development of strong low-level rotation

2

Development of a downdraft partially embedded in the rotation that aids in the transport of rotation to the ground, followed by focusing of that rotation through convergence if the downdraft reaches the ground with some very uncommon properties

3

Page 46: 2009 Storms, Part 1

Tornadogenesis in a Nutshell

Page 47: 2009 Storms, Part 1

The Need for Better Understanding of Tornadic Storms

• Tornado warnings– Improvements in our understanding of tornadogenesis should better

allow us to assess the likelihood of tornadoes in thunderstorms– Possible advances in our ability to forecast tornado intensity and

longevity

Tornado warning performance from 1986-2002 (adapted from Brooks 2004)

Improvements likely due to 88D network, better training, better SPC guidance, application of VORTEX1 findings?

Page 48: 2009 Storms, Part 1

Summary (what we know)• Supercells acquire rotation aloft by tilting horizontal vorticity (streamwise

horizontal vorticity leads to net cyclonic updraft rotation)

• Although most significant tornadoes are associated with supercell thunderstorms, most supercells are not tornadic (and the supercells with the strongest mesocyclones are not necessarily the most likely to be tornadic)

• Tornadogenesis requires a downdraft if pre-existing vertical vorticity is absent at the surface

• The temperature of the downdrafts seems to be important to tornadogenesis; downdrafts that are excessively cold apparently are unfavorable for tornadogenesis

• Environments that have large ambient low-level vertical wind shear (larger than what is found in an average supercell environment) and large ambient relative humidity favor tornadic supercells over nontornadic supercells

Page 49: 2009 Storms, Part 1

LSX Composite

Page 50: 2009 Storms, Part 1

LSX Reflectivity lvl 2

Page 51: 2009 Storms, Part 1

Base Velocity lvl 2

Page 52: 2009 Storms, Part 1

Storm Relative Velocity lvl 2

Tornado warning?

Page 53: 2009 Storms, Part 1
Page 54: 2009 Storms, Part 1
Page 55: 2009 Storms, Part 1
Page 56: 2009 Storms, Part 1

http://www.gpsvisualizer.com/geocode

http://www.capelinks.com/cape-cod/maps/geocode/