© 2014 hdr architecture, inc., all rights reserved.©...
TRANSCRIPT
-
2014 HDR Architecture, Inc., all rights reserved. 2014 HDR Architecture, Inc., all rights reserved. 2014 HDR Architecture, Inc., all rights reserved. 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. 2016 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.
-
2016 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.
Grant Creek Restoration & Flood Control Project: 10-year Follow Up
REPLACE ONE OF THESE IMAGES
WITH AN ACTUAL PHOTO (SITE
PHOTO)
AMFM 2017 Annual Conference March 7th, 2017
-
Project Background
Design & Construction
Lessons Learned
Questions
-
Lower Project Limit at Clark Fork River Floodplain
Upper Project Limit at I-90
-
Project Background
-
Mullan Trail Subdivision
-
Resulted in lawsuit Homeowners Association implemented a fix
that experienced groundwater challenges Prompted Missoula County to initiate a
project through the US Army Corps of Engineers to find a solution
1997 Flood Event
-
Pre-project analysis showed significant 100-year flood impacts
Mullan Trail Subdivision 42 homes affected
-
Homes were being flooded
Pre-1997 flood construction Post-1997 flood construction
-
Aggradation was reducing flood conveyance
-
Culverts were significant barriers to fish passage
-
Severe erosion was occurring
-
Multiple project stakeholders resulted in project challenges!
City of Missoula State Highway Railroad Airport Area Large Undeveloped
Ranches Irrigation District Existing
Developments Interested
Developers
-
$4.2 M FEMA Pre-disaster Mitigation Grant was acquired by Missoula County for the project!
SUBMITTED!
Second Application All Electronic new for
FEMA Missoula County
Commitment and Funds Landowner
Easements/Approvals Mapped Property
Elevations Supported by Hydrologic
and Hydraulic Studies Benefit-cost Analysis
Required
-
Design and Construction - Grant Creek Project Reaches
Horseshoe Bend
Upper Grant Creek
Hiawatha Lake
Mullan Trail/Prarie Schooner
Clark Fork Confluence
-
The Creek was filling-in upstream of Highway 10 (West Broadway) Uppper Grant Creek Reach
Field measurements of the creek bed showed a rise in the bed elevation
?
The creek was losing its flood-carrying capacity
-
Cleaning of channel and culvert removal in Upper Grant Creek reach improved hydraulics and eased aggradation
Pepsi Co. Culverts... Removed By Mother
Nature!
-
Fish passage problems at West Broadway were addressed
Culvert replacement was designed to:
Reduce Flood Elevation Meet State and Federal Fish
Passage Criteria
Rehabilitation of existing culverts was not cost effective Replacing the culvert with natural bottom structures was implemented
Relative Cumulative Culvert Costs
Years
Rel
ativ
e C
osts
Culvert Replacement Costs
Culvert Rehabilitation
Long-Term Cost Savings Strategy
Chart1
10010
10520
11030
11540
12050
12560
13070
13580
14090
145100
150110
155120
160130
165140
170150
175160
180170
185180
190190
195200
200210
205220
210230
215240
220270
225280
230290
235300
240310
245320
250330
255340
260350
265360
270370
275380
280390
285400
290410
295420
300430
305440
310450
315460
320470
325480
330490
335500
340510
345540
Cumulative Open Bottom Culvert Cost
Cumulative Baffled Culvert Cost
Years
Relative Costs
Relative Cumulative Culvert Costs
Sheet1
11001001010
251051020
351101030
451151040
551201050
651251060
751301070
851351080
951401090
10514510100
11515010110
12515510120
13516010130
14516510140
15517010150
16517510160
17518010170
18518510180
19519010190
20519510200
21520010210
22520510220
23521010230
24521510240
25522030270
26522510280
27523010290
28523510300
29524010310
30524510320
31525010330
32525510340
33526010350
34526510360
35527010370
36527510380
37528010390
38528510400
39529010410
40529510420
41530010430
42530510440
43531010450
44531510460
45532010470
46532510480
47533010490
48533510500
49534010510
50534530540
Sheet2
Sheet3
-
Landowners in Horseshoe Bend Reach not ready to participate in the project
Horseshoe Bend Unnatural Channel Remains Pruyn Check Dam Remains (10 Year Commitment)
-
Post-project 100-year floodplain Hiawatha Lake and Mullan Trail Reaches
Hiawatha Lake Reach
Mullan Trail Reach
-
Analysis of groundwater/surface water interactions at Hiawatha Lake reach were key
Shallow groundwater contributed to historical Grant Creek flooding!
-
Sand Seams Were Eliminated When Hiawatha Lake Riparian Terrace Was Constructed
-
Addressing irrigation inputs to groundwater in the Hiawatha Lake and Mullan Trail reaches were necessary
Worked With Active Agriculture Entities to Provide More Flow Control
Minimized Waste Streams
Reduced Infiltration Sources
-
Established/Developed Riparian Corridor in the Hiawatha Lake, Mullan Trail and Prairie Schooner Reaches Used locally adapted
native plant species. Minimized exotic
plant colonization. Maximized Woody
Material. Minimized impacts to
Lower Clark Fork River trout- overflow weir
Improved waterfowl and other wildlife habitat.
-
Riparian Corridor Was Also Developed With Fish Passage Considerations
Mullan Trail Earthen Overflow Weir in
Operation
-
Design and Construction - Grant Creek Project Reaches
Horseshoe Bend
Upper Grant Creek
Hiawatha Lake
Mullan Trail/Prarie Schooner
Clark Fork Confluence
-
Channel Modifications in Prairie Schooner Reach Was Limited by Available Right-of-way
-
Channel construction did help landowners in the Mullan Road reach
-
Design and Construction - Grant Creek Project Reaches
Horseshoe Bend
Upper Grant Creek
Hiawatha Lake
Mullan Trail/Prarie Schooner
Clark Fork Confluence
-
Peak Flow Bypass engineered solution was required
-
Public Policy failures within governmental entities can happen (FEMA DFIRM mapping was wrong from the start)
Be Flexible - game changers (Hurricane Katrina) can occur Multiple Stakeholders can shape the final product public outreach is paramount
Lessons Learned
DFIRM mapping was INCORRECT, which led to poor decisions
-
Some recommended actions may have to wait (Dougherty Ranch at Horseshoe Bend, Pruyn
Check Dam, properties west of Mullan Trail subdivision) Natural solutions are preferred, but dont get trapped (Peak flow bypass structure enabled the
hydraulic solution)
Lessons Learned (cont.)
-
Surface and groundwater interconnection should be considered (Hiawatha Lake sand seam removal solved the Mullan Trail subdivision groundwater problems)
Project permitting adds considerable time and complexity
Lessons Learned (cont.)
-
Questions?
Slide Number 1Grant Creek Restoration & Flood Control Project: 10-year Follow UpSlide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 61997 Flood EventPre-project analysis showed significant 100-year flood impactsHomes were being floodedAggradation was reducing flood conveyanceCulverts were significant barriers to fish passageSevere erosion was occurringMultiple project stakeholders resulted in project challenges!$4.2 M FEMA Pre-disaster Mitigation Grant was acquired by Missoula County for the project!Design and Construction - Grant Creek Project ReachesThe Creek was filling-in upstream of Highway 10 (West Broadway) Uppper Grant Creek ReachCleaning of channel and culvert removal in Upper Grant Creek reach improved hydraulics and eased aggradationFish passage problems at West Broadway were addressedLandowners in Horseshoe Bend Reach not ready to participate in the projectPost-project 100-year floodplain Hiawatha Lake and Mullan Trail ReachesAnalysis of groundwater/surface water interactions at Hiawatha Lake reach were key Sand Seams Were Eliminated When Hiawatha Lake Riparian Terrace Was ConstructedAddressing irrigation inputs to groundwater in the Hiawatha Lake and Mullan Trail reaches were necessaryEstablished/Developed Riparian Corridor in the Hiawatha Lake, Mullan Trail and Prairie Schooner ReachesRiparian Corridor Was Also Developed With Fish Passage ConsiderationsDesign and Construction - Grant Creek Project ReachesChannel Modifications in Prairie Schooner Reach Was Limited by Available Right-of-wayChannel construction did help landowners in the Mullan Road reachDesign and Construction - Grant Creek Project ReachesPeak Flow Bypass engineered solution was requiredLessons LearnedLessons Learned (cont.)Lessons Learned (cont.)Questions?