2015 us combustion meeting - west - identification, correction, and comparison of detailed kinetic...
TRANSCRIPT
.edu/comocheng
Victor R. Lambert & Richard H. West 9th US National Combustion Meeting 20 June 2015
1
[email protected] richardhwest rwest
Identification, Correction, and Comparisonof Detailed Kinetic Models
Grant No. 1403171
Identification, Correction, and Comparisonof Detailed Kinetic Models
!
!"
!
!" #
!
!"
!
!!"
!
!"#$
!"
!
!"!"#$
!"#
!" !"
!"#"#!
!"#
!!"
!!"
!"#$
#$!"
!"#$
!!"
!""#
!""#
!"#
!"#$"
!"#$
#$!
!!"
!"
!
!
!
!"
!
!"#
!
!
!!
!"""#!""#
$
!""#$
!"
!"#$
!!"#$
%!
!"#$
%
!"#$
%!"#$
%!
Elizabeth
Becky
ElizaLizBeth
with many names for the same thing...
...it is difficult to compare models...
...researchers give molecules nicknames.
...and easy to make mistakes!
...and create a unified database...
with this we can:..
To publish in "CHEMKIN" format...
Our tool to identify species...
...allows us to analyze models.
...find common parameters,..
...detect mistakes,..
...identify controversial rates,..
...of all kinetic models!
Model Complexity is increasing2-methylalkanes/Sarathy
n-Heptane/Mehln-Octane/Ji
Heptamethylnonane/Westbrook
Isobutene/Dias
Ethanol/Leplat
1-butanol/Grana
Acetaldehyde/Leplat
Ethylbenzene/Therrien
Methylcrotonate/Bennadji
Methyloleate/Naik
Furan/Yasunaga
Methylhexanoate/Westbrook
Methydecanoate/Herbinet
H2/KlippensteinH2/ConnaireH2/Marinov
GRI-MechMethane/Leeds
Ethane
C2/Karbach
Ethylene/Egolfopoulos
C3/AppelUSC-MechMarinov
Propane/Qin
n-ButaneNeopentane/Wang
n-Heptane/Currann-Heptane/Babushok
10
100
1000
10000
1995 2000 2005 2010
Num
ber o
f spe
cies
in m
odel
Year of publication
Transforming data into knowledge—ProcessInformatics for combustion chemistryMichael Frenklach *
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, and Environmental Energy Technologies
Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Abstract
The present frontier of combustion chemistry is the development of predictive reaction models,
namely, chemical kinetics models capable of accurate numerical predictions with quantifiable uncertain-
ties. While the usual factors like deficient knowledge of reaction pathways and insufficient accuracy of
individual measurements and/or theoretical calculations impede progress, the key obstacle is the incon-
sistency of accumulating data and proliferating reaction mechanisms. Process Informatics introduces a
new paradigm. It relies on three major components: proper organization of scientific data, availability
of scientific tools for analysis and processing of these data, and engagement of the entire scientific com-
munity in the data collection and analysis. The proper infrastructure will enable a new form of scien-
tific method by considering the entire content of information available, assessing and assuring mutual
scientific consistency of the data, rigorously assessing data uncertainty, identifying problems with the
available data, evaluating model predictability, suggesting new experimental and theoretical work with
the highest possible impact, reaching community consensus, and merging the assembled data into new
knowledge.! 2006 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Keywords: Kinetics; Modeling; Optimization; Consistency; Informatics; PrIMe
1. Introduction
1.1. Progress in combustion depends on reliablereaction kinetics
Research is motivated by the human desire toexplain phenomena surrounding us and the passionfor new discoveries. Driven by individual satisfac-tion such activities aim at improving the qualityof human experience. One can generalize the stimu-lus for research as developing the ability of makingpredictions. Indeed, predicting properties of a mate-
rial before it is synthesized, predicting performanceof a device before it is built, or predicting the mag-nitude of a natural disaster ahead of time all haveobvious benefits to society.In the area of combustion, we have all the aboveelements: the fascination with fire from ancienttimes, its broad application to numerous aspectsof everyday life, and the definite need for reliablepredictions (see Fig. 1). In recent decades the com-bustion research was largely driven by the desiredincrease in energy efficiency, reduction in pollutantformation, and material synthesis. The need fortying the research to practical applications was fur-ther emphasized in the Hottel address of the 28thSymposium by Professor Glassman [1].1540-7489/$ - see front matter ! 2006 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.121
* Fax: +1 510 643 5599.E-mail address: [email protected]
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 31 (2007) 125–140
www.elsevier.com/locate/proci
Proceedingsof the
CombustionInstitute
“the key obstacle is the inconsistency of accumulating data and proliferating reaction mechanisms.
Process Informatics introduces a new paradigm. It relies on three major components: • proper organization of scientific data,• availability of scientific tools for analysis and
processing of these data,• and engagement of the entire scientific community
in the data collection and analysis.”M. Frenklach, Proc. Combust. Inst. 31 (2006)
Model Complexity is still increasing2-methylalkanes/Sarathy
n-Heptane/Mehln-Octane/Ji
Heptamethylnonane/Westbrook
Isobutene/Dias
Ethanol/Leplat
1-butanol/Grana
Acetaldehyde/Leplat
Ethylbenzene/Therrien
Methylcrotonate/Bennadji
Methyloleate/Naik
Furan/Yasunaga
Methylhexanoate/Westbrook
Methydecanoate/Herbinet
H2/KlippensteinH2/ConnaireH2/Marinov
GRI-MechMethane/Leeds
Ethane
C2/Karbach
Ethylene/Egolfopoulos
C3/AppelUSC-MechMarinov
Propane/Qin
n-ButaneNeopentane/Wang
n-Heptane/Currann-Heptane/Babushok
10
100
1000
10000
1995 2000 2005 2010
Num
ber o
f spe
cies
in m
odel
Year of publication
Model Complexity is still increasing2-methylalkanes/Sarathy
n-Heptane/Mehln-Octane/Ji
Heptamethylnonane/Westbrook
Isobutene/Dias
Ethanol/Leplat
1-butanol/Grana
Acetaldehyde/Leplat
Ethylbenzene/Therrien
Methylcrotonate/Bennadji
Methyloleate/Naik
Furan/Yasunaga
Methylhexanoate/Westbrook
Methydecanoate/Herbinet
H2/KlippensteinH2/ConnaireH2/Marinov
GRI-MechMethane/Leeds
Ethane
C2/Karbach
Ethylene/Egolfopoulos
C3/AppelUSC-MechMarinov
Propane/Qin
n-ButaneNeopentane/Wang
n-Heptane/Currann-Heptane/Babushok
10
100
1000
10000
1995 2000 2005 2010
Num
ber o
f spe
cies
in m
odel
Year of publication
Assoc. Lib Director, ORNL Computing
APPENDIX D
THERMO DATA (FORMAT AND LISTING)
The order and format of the input data cards in this appendix are given in the follow-
ing table"
Card
order
(a)
(Final
card)
ContentsFormat Card
column
THERMO
Temperature ranges for 2 sets of coefficients:
lowest T. common T, and highest T
Species name
Date
Atomic symbols and formula
Phase of species (S, L, or G for solid, liquid,
or gas, respectively)
Temperature range
Integer t
Coefficients ai(i = 1 to 5) in equations (90) to (92)
(for upper temperature interval)
Integer 2
Coefficients in equations (90) to (92) (a6, a T for
upper temperature interval, and a 1, a2, and a 3
for lower)
Integer 3
Coefficients in equations (90) to (92) (a4, a5, a6,
a, i for lower temperature interval)
Integer 4
Repeat cards numbered 1 to 4 in cc 80 for each
species
END (Indicates end of thermodynamic data)
3A4
3F10.3
3A4
2A3
4(A2, F3. O)A1
2F10.3I15
5(E15.8)
15
4(E15.8)
I20
3A4
1 to6
1 to 30
1 to 12
19 to 24
25 to 44
45
46 to 65
80
1 to75
80
1 to75
80
1 to 60
8O
ito3
aGaseous species and condensed species with only one condensed phase can be in
any order. However. the sets for two or more condensed phases of the same
species must be adjacent. If there are more than two condensed phases of a
species, their sets must be either in increasing or decreasing order according
to their temperature intervals.
168
ORIGINAL PAGE IS
OF. POOR QUALITY
nq
NASA (Chemkin) format is very dense –not much room for species identifiers
Chemical Formula Parameters for H(T), S(T)Species Name
Space constraints led to “creative” naming schemes
MVOX
IIC4H7Q2-T
C3H5-A C3H5-SC6H101OOH5-4
TC4H8O2H-IC4H8O1-3
C3KET21
CH3COCH2O2H
Sometimes the same species appears twice in a model, with different names
• C3KET21 is generated from alkyl peroxy radical isomerization pathway
• CH3COCH2O2H is generated from low-temperature oxidation of acetone
MVOX
IIC4H7Q2-T
C3H5-A C3H5-SC6H101OOH5-4
TC4H8O2H-IC4H8O1-3
C3KET21
CH3COCH2O2H
We need a tool to help identify species
Reaction Mechanism Generator (RMG-Py) has many of the required features
• Represent molecules and recognize duplicates• Propose reactions from templates and rules• Estimate parameters quickly• Expand model based on known species• Modular and Extensible!
⇌RMG
Algorithm is like solving a Sudoku puzzle.
• Identify species with only one possible structure• CO2• H2O• C3H8
• Then species with "borrowed" thermochemistry• Then “boot-strap” based on how these react…
Identifying ‘sc3h5co’ from its reactions:
7
3. Implementation
3.1. How the importer tool will behave
To illustrate how the tool would help a user to identify a species, consider the species labeled “sc3h5co” from a large methyl butanoate combustion model [28]. The data on sc3h5co are a block of thermochemistry parameters and seven reactions in which it participates (from 1,219 reactions in the model). The thermochemistry block contains the chemical formula and expressions for enthalpy and entropy as functions of temperature:
The first thing the tool will do is to check previously imported models for matching thermochemistry blocks. For example, it could tell the user that the LLNL model for n-Heptane [29] has a species with the same parameters that has already been identified as but-2-enoyl ( ), and that LLNL called it “SC3H5CHO”. This would probably be enough evidence for the user to confirm the match.
If the species cannot be found in a previously imported model, the reactions give additional clues. The seven reactions containing sc3h5co in the methyl butanoate model are:
R1 sc3h5cho + o2 ⇌ sc3h5co + ho2 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R2 sc3h5cho + oh ⇌ sc3h5co + h2o + ⇌ + sc3h5co R3 sc3h5cho + o ⇌ sc3h5co + oh + ⇌ + sc3h5co R4 sc3h5cho + ch3 ⇌ sc3h5co + ch4 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R5 sc3h5cho + h ⇌ sc3h5co + h2 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R6 sc3h5cho + ho2 ⇌ sc3h5co + h2o2 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R7 sc3h5co ⇌ c3h5-s + co sc3h5co ⇌ +
The first six are all hydrogen abstractions from but-2-enal (assume for now that this species has already been identified), which has four types of hydrogen atom, implying sc3h5co could be one of four possible radi-cals. The seventh reaction is the decomposi-tion into propenyl and carbon monoxide, also limiting sc3h5co to four possible spe-cies. The Venn diagram in Fig. 4 shows that only one species satisfies all seven reactions: but-2-enoyl. The tool will present the user with this data, as well as a comparison of
sc3h5co 11/15/95 thermc 4h 5o 1 0g 300.000 5000.000 1392.000 21 1.25514754e+01 1.22521948e-02-4.22382101e-06 6.59184896e-10-3.83818826e-14 2-4.25349795e+03-4.02864145e+01 1.74191343e+00 3.97229536e-02-3.20061901e-05 3 1.38227925e-08-2.46272017e-12-6.64428100e+02 1.70762023e+01
Species label Chemical formula: C4H5O1 Parameters for H(T), S(T) expressions
Fig. 4. Venn diagram showing identification of “sc3h5co” from reactions R1 through R7.
Identifying ‘sc3h5co’ from its reactions:
7
3. Implementation
3.1. How the importer tool will behave
To illustrate how the tool would help a user to identify a species, consider the species labeled “sc3h5co” from a large methyl butanoate combustion model [28]. The data on sc3h5co are a block of thermochemistry parameters and seven reactions in which it participates (from 1,219 reactions in the model). The thermochemistry block contains the chemical formula and expressions for enthalpy and entropy as functions of temperature:
The first thing the tool will do is to check previously imported models for matching thermochemistry blocks. For example, it could tell the user that the LLNL model for n-Heptane [29] has a species with the same parameters that has already been identified as but-2-enoyl ( ), and that LLNL called it “SC3H5CHO”. This would probably be enough evidence for the user to confirm the match.
If the species cannot be found in a previously imported model, the reactions give additional clues. The seven reactions containing sc3h5co in the methyl butanoate model are:
R1 sc3h5cho + o2 ⇌ sc3h5co + ho2 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R2 sc3h5cho + oh ⇌ sc3h5co + h2o + ⇌ + sc3h5co R3 sc3h5cho + o ⇌ sc3h5co + oh + ⇌ + sc3h5co R4 sc3h5cho + ch3 ⇌ sc3h5co + ch4 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R5 sc3h5cho + h ⇌ sc3h5co + h2 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R6 sc3h5cho + ho2 ⇌ sc3h5co + h2o2 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R7 sc3h5co ⇌ c3h5-s + co sc3h5co ⇌ +
The first six are all hydrogen abstractions from but-2-enal (assume for now that this species has already been identified), which has four types of hydrogen atom, implying sc3h5co could be one of four possible radi-cals. The seventh reaction is the decomposi-tion into propenyl and carbon monoxide, also limiting sc3h5co to four possible spe-cies. The Venn diagram in Fig. 4 shows that only one species satisfies all seven reactions: but-2-enoyl. The tool will present the user with this data, as well as a comparison of
sc3h5co 11/15/95 thermc 4h 5o 1 0g 300.000 5000.000 1392.000 21 1.25514754e+01 1.22521948e-02-4.22382101e-06 6.59184896e-10-3.83818826e-14 2-4.25349795e+03-4.02864145e+01 1.74191343e+00 3.97229536e-02-3.20061901e-05 3 1.38227925e-08-2.46272017e-12-6.64428100e+02 1.70762023e+01
Species label Chemical formula: C4H5O1 Parameters for H(T), S(T) expressions
Fig. 4. Venn diagram showing identification of “sc3h5co” from reactions R1 through R7.
Identifying ‘sc3h5co’ from its reactions:
7
3. Implementation
3.1. How the importer tool will behave
To illustrate how the tool would help a user to identify a species, consider the species labeled “sc3h5co” from a large methyl butanoate combustion model [28]. The data on sc3h5co are a block of thermochemistry parameters and seven reactions in which it participates (from 1,219 reactions in the model). The thermochemistry block contains the chemical formula and expressions for enthalpy and entropy as functions of temperature:
The first thing the tool will do is to check previously imported models for matching thermochemistry blocks. For example, it could tell the user that the LLNL model for n-Heptane [29] has a species with the same parameters that has already been identified as but-2-enoyl ( ), and that LLNL called it “SC3H5CHO”. This would probably be enough evidence for the user to confirm the match.
If the species cannot be found in a previously imported model, the reactions give additional clues. The seven reactions containing sc3h5co in the methyl butanoate model are:
R1 sc3h5cho + o2 ⇌ sc3h5co + ho2 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R2 sc3h5cho + oh ⇌ sc3h5co + h2o + ⇌ + sc3h5co R3 sc3h5cho + o ⇌ sc3h5co + oh + ⇌ + sc3h5co R4 sc3h5cho + ch3 ⇌ sc3h5co + ch4 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R5 sc3h5cho + h ⇌ sc3h5co + h2 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R6 sc3h5cho + ho2 ⇌ sc3h5co + h2o2 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R7 sc3h5co ⇌ c3h5-s + co sc3h5co ⇌ +
The first six are all hydrogen abstractions from but-2-enal (assume for now that this species has already been identified), which has four types of hydrogen atom, implying sc3h5co could be one of four possible radi-cals. The seventh reaction is the decomposi-tion into propenyl and carbon monoxide, also limiting sc3h5co to four possible spe-cies. The Venn diagram in Fig. 4 shows that only one species satisfies all seven reactions: but-2-enoyl. The tool will present the user with this data, as well as a comparison of
sc3h5co 11/15/95 thermc 4h 5o 1 0g 300.000 5000.000 1392.000 21 1.25514754e+01 1.22521948e-02-4.22382101e-06 6.59184896e-10-3.83818826e-14 2-4.25349795e+03-4.02864145e+01 1.74191343e+00 3.97229536e-02-3.20061901e-05 3 1.38227925e-08-2.46272017e-12-6.64428100e+02 1.70762023e+01
Species label Chemical formula: C4H5O1 Parameters for H(T), S(T) expressions
Fig. 4. Venn diagram showing identification of “sc3h5co” from reactions R1 through R7.
Identifying ‘sc3h5co’ from its reactions:
7
3. Implementation
3.1. How the importer tool will behave
To illustrate how the tool would help a user to identify a species, consider the species labeled “sc3h5co” from a large methyl butanoate combustion model [28]. The data on sc3h5co are a block of thermochemistry parameters and seven reactions in which it participates (from 1,219 reactions in the model). The thermochemistry block contains the chemical formula and expressions for enthalpy and entropy as functions of temperature:
The first thing the tool will do is to check previously imported models for matching thermochemistry blocks. For example, it could tell the user that the LLNL model for n-Heptane [29] has a species with the same parameters that has already been identified as but-2-enoyl ( ), and that LLNL called it “SC3H5CHO”. This would probably be enough evidence for the user to confirm the match.
If the species cannot be found in a previously imported model, the reactions give additional clues. The seven reactions containing sc3h5co in the methyl butanoate model are:
R1 sc3h5cho + o2 ⇌ sc3h5co + ho2 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R2 sc3h5cho + oh ⇌ sc3h5co + h2o + ⇌ + sc3h5co R3 sc3h5cho + o ⇌ sc3h5co + oh + ⇌ + sc3h5co R4 sc3h5cho + ch3 ⇌ sc3h5co + ch4 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R5 sc3h5cho + h ⇌ sc3h5co + h2 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R6 sc3h5cho + ho2 ⇌ sc3h5co + h2o2 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R7 sc3h5co ⇌ c3h5-s + co sc3h5co ⇌ +
The first six are all hydrogen abstractions from but-2-enal (assume for now that this species has already been identified), which has four types of hydrogen atom, implying sc3h5co could be one of four possible radi-cals. The seventh reaction is the decomposi-tion into propenyl and carbon monoxide, also limiting sc3h5co to four possible spe-cies. The Venn diagram in Fig. 4 shows that only one species satisfies all seven reactions: but-2-enoyl. The tool will present the user with this data, as well as a comparison of
sc3h5co 11/15/95 thermc 4h 5o 1 0g 300.000 5000.000 1392.000 21 1.25514754e+01 1.22521948e-02-4.22382101e-06 6.59184896e-10-3.83818826e-14 2-4.25349795e+03-4.02864145e+01 1.74191343e+00 3.97229536e-02-3.20061901e-05 3 1.38227925e-08-2.46272017e-12-6.64428100e+02 1.70762023e+01
Species label Chemical formula: C4H5O1 Parameters for H(T), S(T) expressions
Fig. 4. Venn diagram showing identification of “sc3h5co” from reactions R1 through R7.
Identifying ‘sc3h5co’ from its reactions:
R1-R6R7
7
3. Implementation
3.1. How the importer tool will behave
To illustrate how the tool would help a user to identify a species, consider the species labeled “sc3h5co” from a large methyl butanoate combustion model [28]. The data on sc3h5co are a block of thermochemistry parameters and seven reactions in which it participates (from 1,219 reactions in the model). The thermochemistry block contains the chemical formula and expressions for enthalpy and entropy as functions of temperature:
The first thing the tool will do is to check previously imported models for matching thermochemistry blocks. For example, it could tell the user that the LLNL model for n-Heptane [29] has a species with the same parameters that has already been identified as but-2-enoyl ( ), and that LLNL called it “SC3H5CHO”. This would probably be enough evidence for the user to confirm the match.
If the species cannot be found in a previously imported model, the reactions give additional clues. The seven reactions containing sc3h5co in the methyl butanoate model are:
R1 sc3h5cho + o2 ⇌ sc3h5co + ho2 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R2 sc3h5cho + oh ⇌ sc3h5co + h2o + ⇌ + sc3h5co R3 sc3h5cho + o ⇌ sc3h5co + oh + ⇌ + sc3h5co R4 sc3h5cho + ch3 ⇌ sc3h5co + ch4 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R5 sc3h5cho + h ⇌ sc3h5co + h2 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R6 sc3h5cho + ho2 ⇌ sc3h5co + h2o2 + ⇌ + sc3h5co R7 sc3h5co ⇌ c3h5-s + co sc3h5co ⇌ +
The first six are all hydrogen abstractions from but-2-enal (assume for now that this species has already been identified), which has four types of hydrogen atom, implying sc3h5co could be one of four possible radi-cals. The seventh reaction is the decomposi-tion into propenyl and carbon monoxide, also limiting sc3h5co to four possible spe-cies. The Venn diagram in Fig. 4 shows that only one species satisfies all seven reactions: but-2-enoyl. The tool will present the user with this data, as well as a comparison of
sc3h5co 11/15/95 thermc 4h 5o 1 0g 300.000 5000.000 1392.000 21 1.25514754e+01 1.22521948e-02-4.22382101e-06 6.59184896e-10-3.83818826e-14 2-4.25349795e+03-4.02864145e+01 1.74191343e+00 3.97229536e-02-3.20061901e-05 3 1.38227925e-08-2.46272017e-12-6.64428100e+02 1.70762023e+01
Species label Chemical formula: C4H5O1 Parameters for H(T), S(T) expressions
Fig. 4. Venn diagram showing identification of “sc3h5co” from reactions R1 through R7.
‘sc3h5co’ is but-2-enoyl
Human-Computer team can identify species more quickly
• Our new tool uses RMG to generate reactions to compare with the target model
• A human reviews the evidence and confirms matches.
Generate reactions,
check for equivalents,
propose matches
Review evidence,
confirm matches.
proposed
matches
proposed
matches
Human Computer
confirmed
matches
confirmed
matches
• Model compiled over many years by many authors• Recently replaced core chemistry, merged methyl
cyclohexane, replaced toluene, and still updating other submechanisms…
• We found 51 unintended duplicates, now fixed.• Identifying species allowed reactions to be
classified and correlated uncertainties estimated, for Uncertainty Quantification (talk 114RK-0445)
Identified all 1.7k species in latest LLNL model
60 papers in Reaction Kinetics division
33 mention or use Chemkin software
28 have supplementary material
17 are kinetic models
13 are usable
We analyzed all mechanisms in proceedings of 34th Combustion Symposium
Of 13 models in the 34th Symposium, 77% are at least 77% identified
113113
852137
1686380
1064202
488296
94125
335
113121
877137
19241924
1350202
662355
277125
392
0 500 1000 1500 2000
Veloo p.599Sheen p.527Darcy p.411
Liu p.401Malewicki p.361Malewicki p.353
Wang p.335Husson p.325
Herbinet p.297Dagaut p.289Matsugi p.269
Labbe p.259Somers p.225 Identified
Unidentified
C/H/O Species
(as of last week).
Some species have many names
• Note that A1 means either benzene or phenyl
Species Names
propen-2-yl radical C3H5-T, ch3cch2, TC3H5
benzene A1, A, C6H6#, c6h6
phenyl radical A1J, A1, C6H5#, c6h5
1-butyl radical PC4H9, R20C4H9, NC4H9, NC4H9P
2-hexyl radical R72C6H13, hex2yl, C6H13-2
isoprene b13de2m, IC5H8
Thermochemistry: Of 1039 Species found in 2 or more models…
😀 408 (39%) have identical thermo
😊 731 (70%) span < 5 kJ/mol
😟 28 (3%) span > 50 kJ/mol
Spread in ∆Hf(298K) in kJ/mol
# of
Spe
cies
Of 60 species also in Argonne/Ruscic’s Active Thermochemical Tables…
😀 3 are always within the ATcT uncertainty bounds
😊 23 (38%) are always within 1 kJ/mol of ATcT uncertainty
😟 13 (22%) are sometimes more than 10 kJ/mol outside ATcT uncertainty
Worst error in ∆Hf(298K) beyond uncertainty, in kJ/mol
# of
Spe
cies
Of 60 species also in Argonne/Ruscic’s Active Thermochemical Tables…
😊 52 (87%) are sometimes within 1 kJ/mol of ATcT uncertainty
😧 4 are always more than 10 kJ/mol outside ATcT uncertainty
Least error in ∆Hf(298K) beyond uncertainty, in kJ/mol
# of
Spe
cies
Kinetics: Of 1303 reactions in 3 or more models…
😉 432 (33%) have identical rates
😊 721 (55%) agree within a factor of 2
😟 233 (18%) disagree by > 10x
😬 45 (3%) disagree by > 1000x
span in log10(k @ 1000K)
# of
Rea
ctio
ns
(16 outliers > 1010)
Often, unannounced changes are made when merging from one model to another.
⇄
⟶ + +
+Examples of reactions slowed by 50 orders of magnitude without comment:
The present X model was coupled to the C5–C7 LLNL n-Heptane sub-mechanisms
...and some rates were divided by
1050
M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12 M13C6H13-2 + O2 <=> C6H12-1 + HO2 -19.4 11.5 -19.4 -19.4IC3H7 + O2 <=> C3H6 + HO2 -19.4 -19.4 11.1 -19.4 -19.4 11.1 -19.4 11.4C3H5-A + HO2 <=> C2H3 + CH2O + OH -18.0 -18.0 12.8 11.5C5H11-2 + O2 <=> C5H10-1 + HO2 8.8 10.8 -19.4 8.8SC4H9 + O2 <=> C4H8-1 + HO2 -18.8 11.0 -18.8 11.2 -18.8 8.8 11.3NC3H7 + O2 <=> C3H6 + HO2 -19.2 10.9 -19.2 11.0 -19.2 -19.2PC4H9 + O2 <=> C4H8-1 + HO2 -18.8 11.0 8.1C5H11-3 + O2 <=> C5H10-2 + HO2 9.4 -19.2 9.4IC4H9 + O2 <=> IC4H8 + HO2 -18.8 -18.8 9.1
Many Radical + O2 = Alkene + HO2 reactions vary by 28–31 orders of magnitude at 1000 K
⇄+ +
Some models all fast
Some models all slow
Some modes a mixture
log10(k@1000K in cm3/mol/s) for each of 13 modelsReaction
Example:
M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12 M13C6H13-2 + O2 <=> C6H12-1 + HO2 -19.4 11.5 -19.4 -19.4IC3H7 + O2 <=> C3H6 + HO2 -19.4 -19.4 11.1 -19.4 -19.4 11.1 -19.4 11.4C3H5-A + HO2 <=> C2H3 + CH2O + OH -18.0 -18.0 12.8 11.5C5H11-2 + O2 <=> C5H10-1 + HO2 8.8 10.8 -19.4 8.8SC4H9 + O2 <=> C4H8-1 + HO2 -18.8 11.0 -18.8 11.2 -18.8 8.8 11.3NC3H7 + O2 <=> C3H6 + HO2 -19.2 10.9 -19.2 11.0 -19.2 -19.2PC4H9 + O2 <=> C4H8-1 + HO2 -18.8 11.0 8.1C5H11-3 + O2 <=> C5H10-2 + HO2 9.4 -19.2 9.4IC4H9 + O2 <=> IC4H8 + HO2 -18.8 -18.8 9.1
Many Radical + O2 = Alkene + HO2 reactions vary by 28–31 orders of magnitude at 1000 K
⇄+ +
Some models all fast
Some models all slow
Some modes a mixture
log10(k@1000K in cm3/mol/s) for each of 13 modelsReaction
Example:
⇄+ +
log10(k)@1000K
A (cm3/mol/s)
n (T=1K)
Ea (cal/mol) Reference
–19.4 4.5E-19 0 5,020 Curran (1998) Discusses but gives no numbers
11.1 1.26E+11 0 0 Tsang (1988) Literature Review
11.4 1.2E+12 0 3,000 Ranzi / Milan (in models since pre-2008)
11.4 1.4E+12 0 5,000 Battin-Leclerc / Nancy (Generated by EXGAS in 2001)
11.2 6.7E+20 -3.02 2,504 DeSain, Klippenstein, et al. 2003. Ab initio/ master equation
The slow rates all come from one source (through a variety of citations)
• Used by 5 of the 13 models
• “C3 sub-models” attributed to Ji (2012), Sarathy (2012), Sarathy (2011), Sivaramakrishnan (2007), Peterson (2007), Curran (2002), Pope (2000), Curran (1998)…
• Trail leads to Curran, Gaffuri, Pitz, Westbrook, Combust. Flame, 114 (1998). Page 154 talks in depth about this family of reactions, which are chemically activated via excited adduct, but no rates are given.
⇄+ +
log10(k)@1000K
A (cm3/mol/s)
n (T=1K)
Ea (cal/mol) Reference
–19.4 4.5E-19 0 5,020 Curran (1998) Discusses but gives no numbers
11.1 1.26E+11 0 0 Tsang (1988) Literature Review
11.4 1.2E+12 0 3,000 Ranzi / Milan (in models since pre-2008)
11.4 1.4E+12 0 5,000 Battin-Leclerc / Nancy (Generated by EXGAS in 2001)
11.2 6.7E+20 -3.02 2,504 DeSain, Klippenstein, et al. 2003. Ab initio/ master equation*
The fast rates come from a variety of estimates
⇄+ +
*for comparison. Not used in these models
.edu/comocheng
!
!"
!
!" #
!
!"
!
!!"
!
!"#$
!"
!
!"!"#$
!"#
!" !"
!"#"#!
!"#
!!"
!!"
!"#$
#$!"
!"#$
!!"
!""#
!""#
!"#
!"#$"
!"#$
#$!
!!"
!"
!
!
!
!"
!
!"#
!
!
!!
!"""#!""#
$
!""#$
!"
!"#$
!!"#$
%!
!"#$
%
!"#$
%!"#$
%!
Elizabeth
Becky
ElizaLizBeth
with many names for the same thing...
...it is difficult to compare models...
...researchers give molecules nicknames.
...and easy to make mistakes!
...and create a unified database...
with this we can:..
To publish in "CHEMKIN" format...
Our tool to identify species...
...allows us to analyze models.
...find common parameters,..
...detect mistakes,..
...identify controversial rates,..
...of all kinetic models!
Richard H. West [email protected] Grant No. 1403171
.edu/comocheng
Richard H. West 20 May 2015
34
[email protected] richardhwest rwest
Grant No. 1403171