2040 douglas county transportation master plan · multimoda the count economy g status of t based...
TRANSCRIPT
September 2019
2040 TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN
DOUGLAS COUNTY
2040 DOUGLAS COUNTY TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN
September 2019
Submitted to
Douglas County Department of Public Works
Engineering Division
100 Third Street, Suite 220
Castle Rock, CO 80104
Submitted by
David Evans and Associates, Inc.
1600 Broadway, Suite 800
Denver, CO80202
This page intentionally blank
Septembe
TABLSection I.
Purpos
Planni
Integr
Stakeh
Section II.
Roadw
Ro
Multim
Section III
Metho
La
Ro
D
Ro
Travel
H
H
Section IV
Roadw
Multim
Bi
Tr
Emerg
Section V.
Capita
Fundin
Roadw
er 2019
E OF COIntroduction a
se ......................
ng Process ......
ated Planning
holder Engage
. Existing Cond
way System .....
oadway Classif
modal Facilities
I. Travel Dema
odology Overvie
and Use .............
oad Network D
RCOG UrbanSim
oadway Capaci
Forecasts and
orizon Years 20
orizon Year 204
V. Recommend
way System .....
modal Facilities
icycle and Pede
ransit .................
ging Technolog
. Transportati
al Improvement
ng Strategies ..
way Improveme
ONTENand Context ..
...........................
...........................
Effort ...............
ment and Com
ditions ...........
...........................
ication ..............
s and Services
and developm
ew .....................
...........................
evelopment Su
m Model Summ
ties ....................
d Network Perf
020 and 2030 ..
40 .......................
ded Transport
...........................
s and Services
estrian ...............
...........................
gies ....................
on Plan Imple
t Program (CIP
...........................
ents ..................
TS .......................
...........................
...........................
...........................
mmunity Outrea
.......................
...........................
...........................
...........................
ent .................
...........................
...........................
mmary ..............
ary .....................
...........................
formance .........
...........................
...........................
ation System
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
mentation .....
P) .........................
...........................
...........................
i
.......................
...........................
...........................
...........................
ach .....................
.......................
...........................
............................
...........................
.......................
...........................
............................
............................
............................
............................
...........................
............................
............................
Plan ..............
...........................
...........................
............................
............................
...........................
.......................
...........................
...........................
...........................
.......................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
.......................
..........................
............................
..........................
.......................
..........................
............................
............................
............................
............................
..........................
............................
............................
.......................
..........................
..........................
............................
............................
..........................
.......................
..........................
..........................
..........................
........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
........................
...........................
............................
...........................
........................
...........................
............................
............................
............................
............................
...........................
............................
............................
........................
...........................
...........................
............................
............................
...........................
........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
Table of Con
.......................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
.......................
...........................
............................
...........................
.......................
...........................
............................
............................
............................
............................
...........................
............................
............................
.......................
...........................
...........................
............................
............................
...........................
.......................
...........................
...........................
...........................
ntents
........ 1
..........1
..........1
......... 2
......... 7
....... 9
......... 9
......... 9
........ 11
...... 17
....... 17
........ 17
....... 18
....... 18
....... 18
...... 20
....... 20
....... 20
...... 27
....... 27
...... 28
....... 28
....... 28
....... 29
..... 35
....... 35
....... 35
....... 37
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
APPEA. Trans
B. Trave
C. Traffic
FIGURFigure 1:
Figure 2:
Figure 3:
Figure 4:
Figure 5:
Figure 6:
Figure 7:
Figure 8:
Figure 9:
Figure 10:
Figure 11:
Figure 12:
Figure 13:
TABLTable 1: Ro
Table 2: To
Table 3: V
Table 4: R
Table 5: B
Table 6: D
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
ENDICESportation Goa
l Forecast Mo
c Analysis Zon
RES Existing Road
Existing Bicy
Existing and
2020 Roadwa
2030 Roadwa
2020 Averag
2030 Averag
2040 Averag
2040 Roadwa
Planned Bicy
Short-Term 2
Mid-Term 20
Long-Term 2
ES oadway Funct
otal Househol
ehicular Level
ecommended
icycle and Ped
ouglas County
ANSPORTATIO
S ls, Objectives
del Validation
nes
dway Network
cle and Pedes
Planned Trans
ay Network ....
ay Network ....
e Daily Traffic
e Daily Traffic
e Daily Traffic
ay Network ....
ycle and Pedes
2019-2020 Roa
21-2030 Road
031-2040 Roa
tional Classific
ds and Employ
l of Service .....
Traffic Volum
destrian Facili
y Transportati
ION MASTER
and Policies
k ........................
strian Facilities
sit Services ....
..........................
..........................
c (ADT) Volume
c (ADT) Volume
c (ADT) Volume
..........................
strian Facilitie
adway Improv
dway Improve
adway Improv
cation ...............
yment Project
..........................
me Thresholds
ties Descriptio
on Improveme
R PLAN
ii
..........................
s .......................
..........................
..........................
..........................
es and Netwo
es and Netwo
es .....................
..........................
s .......................
vements ...........
ments .............
ements ...........
..........................
tions for 2020
..........................
.........................
on Table ..........
ents Summary
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
ork Performanc
ork Performanc
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
0, 2030, and 20
..........................
..........................
..........................
y - Roads ........
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
ce .....................
ce .....................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
040 ..................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
Table of Con
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
ntents
....... 13
....... 14
....... 15
....... 21
....... 22
....... 23
.......24
.......25
....... 31
....... 32
...... 39
...... 40
....... 41
......... 9
....... 17
....... 19
....... 19
.......33
.......42
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
LIST OADT
BUILD
CARA
CDOT
CIP
City
CMP
County
CWIP
DRCOG
EA
FCRTP
FEIS
FHWA
GID
GIS
INFRA
ITS
LID
LOS
MVRTP
NCHRP
PEL
ROD
RTA
RTD
SH
TAC
TAZ
TDM
TIGER
TMP
TOWN
USDOT
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
OF ACRAverage D
Better Uti
Centennia
Colorado D
Capital Im
Aurora, Ca
Douglas C
Douglas C
Counterm
Denver Re
Environme
Fiscally Co
Final Envi
Federal Hi
General Im
Geograph
Infrastruc
Intelligent
Local Imp
Level of S
Metro Visi
National C
Planning a
Record of
Regional T
Regional T
State High
Technical
Traffic An
Transport
Transport
Douglas C
Castle Roc
United Sta
ANSPORTATIO
ONYMSDaily Traffic
lizing Investm
al Airport Revie
Department o
mprovement Pr
astle Pines, Lit
County 2040 C
County
easure with P
egional Counc
ental Assessm
onstrained Re
ronmental Imp
ighway Admin
mprovement D
ic Information
ture for Buildi
t Transportatio
rovement Dist
ervice
ion Region Tra
Cooperative H
and Environme
Decision
Transportation
Transportation
hway
Advisory Com
alysis Zone
ation Demand
ation Investm
County 2040 T
ck, Larkspur, P
ates Departme
ION MASTER
S AND A
ments to Lever
ew Area
f Transportati
rogram
ttleton, Lone T
Comprehensive
Promise
il of Governme
ment
gional Transp
pact Statemen
nistration
District
n Systems
ng America
on Systems
trict
ansportation P
ighway Resea
ental Linkages
n Authorities
n District
mmittee
d Management
ent Generatin
Transportation
Parker
ent of Transpo
R PLAN
iii
BBREVI
age Developm
on
Tree
e Master Plan
ents
ortation Plan
nt
Plan
arch Program
s
t
ng Economic R
Master Plan
ortation
IATIONS
ment
Recovery
S
Table of Con
ntents
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
ANSPORTATIOION MASTER
This page
R PLAN
iv
e intentionally blank
Table of Con
ntents
Septembe
SECT
PurpoThe prima
multimoda
The Count
economy g
status of t
based on p
planning e
regional ag
investmen
plan is inte
needed in
The focus
municipali
coordinate
PlannThe 2040
2040 Doug
Transporta
This updat
Committee
TAC includ
and Open
Agency ou
that involv
Cities o
Littleto
Towns
Highlan
er 2019
TION I.
ose ry purpose of
al transportati
ty's Goal is to
growing. The T
the road netw
pending and p
efforts, includi
gencies. The T
nt of public fun
ended to be a
the future.
of this TMP is
ties within the
ed transportat
ning ProcTMP takes mu
glas County C
ation Plan and
te to the TMP
e (TAC) provid
ded an interdis
Space and Na
utreach was c
ved representa
of Aurora, Cast
n
of Castle Roc
nds Ranch Me
INTRO
the 2040 Tran
on system tha
keep the trave
TMP implemen
ork, including
projected grow
ng specialized
TMP guides th
nds for transp
living docume
s on Douglas C
e County have
tion system is
cess uch of its dire
omprehensive
d other recent
was managed
ding direction a
sciplinary team
atural Resourc
onducted to r
atives from:
tle Pines, Lone
k, Larkspur an
tro District
ODUCT
nsportation M
at offers more
eling public sa
nts these goa
congestion le
wth and develo
d studies and
he County’s ca
ortation syste
ent allowing th
County. Furthe
e been integra
provided.
ction from the
e Master Plan
County plans
d by the Public
and review of
m of key staff
ces.
eceive input f
e Tree, and
nd Parker
1
ION AN
aster Plan (TM
e choices in ho
afe, keep the t
ls through a c
evels and phys
opment trends
efforts by the
apital improve
em improveme
he County to u
er, the transpo
ated into the p
e vision and ob
and builds up
, studies, regu
c Works Engin
the technical
from Public W
rom local, reg
Color
Regio
Denv
ND CON
MP) is to defin
ow people trav
traveling publi
comprehensive
sical condition
s; and integrat
County’s mun
ment program
ent. In order t
update and ad
ortation plans
plan to ensure
bjectives for t
pon the previo
ulations and g
neering Depar
analysis and
Works Enginee
ional and stat
rado Departm
onal Transport
ver Regional C
Sec I. Introd
NTEXT
ne a long-rang
vel in Douglas
ic and goods m
e evaluation o
n; projections f
tion of recent
nicipalities an
m and facilitate
to achieve opt
djust identified
of the incorpo
that a compre
ransportation
us Douglas Co
uidelines.
rtment with a T
draft recomm
ering, Commun
te transportat
ent of Transpo
tation District
Council of Gove
duction and Co
T
e vision for a
s County (Coun
moving, and th
of the existing
for future dem
transportatio
d state and
es the effectiv
timal results, t
d priorities as
orated
ehensive and
documented
ounty 2030
Technical Adv
mendations. Th
nity Developm
ion stakeholde
ortation (CDOT
t (RTD)
ernments (DR
ontext
nty).
he
mands
n
ve
this
in the
visory
he
ment,
ers
T)
RCOG)
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
IntegrThe TMP i
The TMP u
standards
TMP found
in this TM
The TMP f
Transporta
conducted
(DRCOG) R
Douglas C
The purpo
transporta
with neigh
open hous
document
needs.
Douglas C
The Comp
areas with
acknowled
honors and
CMP’s poli
to support
addresses
Consistent
in a series
may be fou
The CMP t
Each plan
plan for bu
adopts, in
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
rated Plncorporates a
update proces
, and guideline
dation. It shou
P as additiona
for Douglas Co
ation Plan (ad
d by the Count
Regional Trans
County 2030 T
se of the Doug
ation system th
hboring jurisdic
se meetings. T
. This plan incl
County 2040 C
rehensive Mas
hin the jurisdict
dges and balan
d protects its d
icies, are inten
t decision-mak
s transportatio
t with the stru
of goals, obje
und in Append
transportation
seeks to supp
uilding a safe, e
Goal 7-1, polic
ANSPORTATIO
anning and builds upo
ss developmen
es. Local, regi
uld be noted th
al planning res
ounty conside
opted 2009), t
ty and local ag
sportation Pla
ransportation
glas County 20
hat offers choi
ctions, regiona
he 2030 Trans
luded corridor
omprehensive
ster Plan (CMP
tion of the Cou
nces the comm
diverse comm
nded to be use
kers in implem
n within its Se
cture within o
ctives and pol
dix A of this pl
element is co
port the same i
efficient, effec
cies that estab
ION MASTER
Effort n the concept
nt began with
onal and state
hat the followi
sources.
rs and builds u
the most rece
gencies, and t
n (2040).
Plan (2009)
030 Transporta
ices in how pe
l transportatio
sportation Plan
prioritization a
e Master Plan
P) serves as th
unty. As state
mon values, rig
unities and res
ed as a basis fo
enting, mainta
ection 7(6), her
ther portions o
icies. These a
an.
mplementary t
identified goal
ctive transport
lish the frame
R PLAN
2
ts and recomm
a review of D
ewide plans a
ng documents
upon informat
ent local agenc
he most recen
ation Plan was
eople travel. Th
on related agen
n integrated al
and improvem
(2019)
he foundation f
ed within its Vis
ghts, and need
sources. The
or a communit
aining, and enh
rein referenced
of the CMP, it
are restated in
to and consist
s through the
tation system.
work of the TM
mendations fro
ouglas County
nd studies we
s remain as re
tion within the
cy transportat
nt Denver Reg
s to define a lo
he developmen
ncies, and refl
ll travel modes
ent priorities f
for future grow
sion Statemen
ds of all County
desired comm
ty conversatio
hancing comm
d as the “CMP
identified com
a summarized
tent with the p
processes in w
The CMP tran
MP. Additiona
Sec I. Introd
om previous p
y’s existing pl
ere also incorp
elevant plans
e previous Dou
tion plans, rec
gional Council
ong-range visio
nt of this plan
ected public in
s and known p
for funding fut
wth and develo
nt, the CMP ref
y residents an
munity vision, a
n during deve
munity values.
P transportatio
mmunity values
d form, below,
purpose and in
which they op
nsportation ele
lly it considers
duction and Co
planning effort
ans, studies,
porated into th
and are refere
uglas County 2
cent studies
of Governmen
on for a multim
was coordinat
nput from seve
plans into a sin
ture transporta
opment for lan
flects,
nd landowners
as expressed i
lopment review
The CMP
n element.”
s for transport
, while a full fo
ntent of the TM
perate. The TM
ement directly
s the ways in w
ontext
ts.
he
enced
2030
nts
modal
ted
eral
ngle
ation
nd
, and
n the
w and
tation
orm
MP.
MP is a
y
which
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
land use s
social, eco
The CMP t
developme
CMP Secti
The CMP P
Goal 7-1 pr
Consist
Suppor
Establis
for all u
Ensure
CIP; tha
develop
CMP Goal
Identify
Promot
Evaluat
Provide
service
Minimiz
Design
calming
wildlife
CMP Goal
Suppor
people
Suppor
develop
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
upports and in
onomic, and en
transportation
ent review pro
on 6(7) POLICY
Policy summar
rovides for:
tency betwee
rt and coordina
sh safety as a
users
development
at developers
pers contribut
7-2 policy sum
y and obtain s
te well-connec
te alternative
e connections
e provider nee
ze impacts to
local roads to
g and to minim
e crossings
7-3 policy sum
rt transit servi
with disabiliti
rt land develop
pment in desig
ANSPORTATIO
nfluences trans
nvironmental s
element addre
ocess. These a
Y SUMMARIES
ries presented
n the TMP and
ation of integr
a leading value
pays its fair s
construct or p
te to and mitig
mmaries:
ufficient right
cted road netw
design option
between exis
ds
existing neigh
o serve the sca
mize impacts t
mmaries:
ces funded by
es
pment concep
gnated urban a
ION MASTER
sportation dem
systems.
esses diverse
are presented
S
below provide
d local and reg
rated travel m
e, considering
share with dev
provide fair-sh
ate impacts to
of way to sup
work to minim
s prior to incr
sting and futur
hbors when pl
ale and purpo
to natural feat
y other agenci
pts that suppo
areas
R PLAN
3
mands and the
topics that are
in a summariz
e an overview
gional plans
odes
user needs an
velopment-req
hare contribut
o off-site trans
pport the need
mize unnecessa
easing road ca
re subdivision
anning major
se of the neig
tures including
ies to meet de
rt multimodal
e ways in whic
e implemented
zed form below
of the CMP Se
nd locations, a
quired road co
tions to public
sportation infra
ds of all users
ary driving
apacity by the
s to shorten t
new roads
ghborhood incl
g significant o
emands of res
transportatio
Sec I. Introd
ch transportati
d primarily thr
w.
ection 6:
and appropria
onstruction co
c capital impro
astructure
and modes
e addition of la
rip lengths an
luding walkab
open space, rip
sidents includi
on and transit
duction and Co
ion systems im
ough the
te design solu
onsistent with
ovements; tha
anes
nd meet emerg
bility and traffi
parian areas a
ng older adult
-oriented
ontext
mpact
utions
the
t
gency
c
and
ts and
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
CMP Goal
Coordin
automo
Manag
incentiv
Apply la
includin
connec
CMP Goal
Achieve
CMP 7-6 p
Achieve
includin
safety i
The transp
transporta
TMP incorp
Douglas C
Guided by
Developm
circumsta
in 2012 to
The scope
at-risk pop
exploring t
Douglas C
This study
highways
study app
then locat
and cost r
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
7-4 policy sum
nate transport
obile use and c
ement (TDM)
ves to busines
and use plann
ng bicycle and
ctivity of roads
7-5 policy sum
e and coordina
olicy summary
e compatibility
ng reduction o
impacts
portation goals
ation network t
porates the CM
County Transit
the Board of
ent provides s
nces to remai
focus on the v
e of the 2012 s
pulations. The
the transporta
County Safety
y conducted a
and congeste
lied the Count
ing sites whe
atio of the pro
ANSPORTATIO
mmaries:
tation program
create healthi
strategies suc
sses for such
ning to reduce
d pedestrian fa
s and paths to
mmary:
ate land use pl
y:
y between the
f at-grade cro
s, objectives a
that compleme
MP’s vision for
Framework P
County Comm
supportive ser
n safe, stable
vulnerable po
study concent
Douglas Coun
ation patterns
Study Final Re
comprehensiv
ed roadways, i
termeasure w
re it can be ap
oposed safety
ION MASTER
ms and policies
er living envir
ch as, stagger
purposes
automobile u
acilities; encou
o reduce trip le
anning to ens
railroads, othe
ssings, and re
nd policies wit
ent the purpos
r transportatio
Plan (2016)
missioner Goal
rvices to assis
, and producti
pulation’s tran
rated on the t
nty Transit Fra
, habits, and n
eport (2017)
ve safety stud
ncluding cons
ith Promise (C
pplied. The stu
improvement
R PLAN
4
s to reduce tra
onments. Exa
red works hou
se and improv
uraging mixed
engths
ure future ope
er transportati
view of new la
thin the CMP d
se and high-lev
n through thes
s, the Douglas
st individuals a
ive. The Count
nsportation ne
ransportation
amework Plan
needs of all Do
dy across Dou
sideration of ru
CWIP) approac
udy ranked 50
ts.
affic congesti
amples include
urs, telecommu
ve access to c
d use developm
erations at Cen
ion corridors a
and uses adjac
describe and o
vel values of t
se goals, objec
s County Depa
and families w
ty conducted
eeds.
needs of the
n (2016) expan
ouglas County
uglas County w
ural highways
ch: identifying
0 potential safe
Sec I. Introd
on, provide alt
e Transportat
uting and ride
community res
ment, and pro
ntennial Airpor
and surroundin
cent to rail line
organize comm
he TMP. Deve
ctives, and po
artment of Co
with special ne
an initial Tran
County’s sen
nded upon the
y residents.
with a focus o
s with low traf
effective cou
ety projects b
duction and Co
ternatives to
ion Demand
esharing and
sources by
omoting
rt
ng land uses,
es for health a
munity values f
elopment of th
licies.
mmunity
eeds and
nsit Demand S
ior, disabled, a
e 2012 researc
n non-state
fic volumes. T
untermeasures
ased on bene
ontext
nd
for the
he
Study
and
ch by
The
s and
fit
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
The study
R
si
A
B
P
Castle Pin
Castle Pin
contains a
designed t
A sub-goa
Plan, Denv
transporta
Town of C
The Castle
continued
plan is to p
needs with
Comprehe
improvem
travel mod
City of Lon
The Lone T
concurren
forecasts
Tree 2040
developme
of transpo
system th
Town of P
The Town
and mobili
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
focused on so
oadway depar
deswipe oppo
pproach turn
roadside cras
edestrian and
es Comprehen
es is located i
a primary goal
to ensure safe
al to this prima
ver Regional C
ation plans”.
Castle Rock Tra
e Rock Transp
development
provide inform
hin the Town
ensive Master
ents necessar
des.
ne Tree 2040 T
Tree 2040 Tra
tly with the D
and transport
0 TMP. The pur
ent and enhan
ortation netwo
at integrates a
arker Transpo
of Parker Tra
ity. This Parke
ANSPORTATIO
olving the follo
rture crashes
osite direction
(left turn oppo
hes at interse
bicycle crash
nsive Plan (20
in the north-ce
for transporta
ety, promote u
ary goal is to “
Council of Gov
ansportation M
portation Mast
and enhance
mation about t
necessary to a
Plan. The Cas
ry to continue
Transportatio
ansportation M
ouglas County
ation recomm
rpose of the L
ncement of th
ork improveme
all travel mod
ortation Maste
nsportation M
er TMP provide
ION MASTER
owing problem
on rural segm
crashes)
osite direction
ections
hes at intersec
016)
entral portion
ation to “Deve
user access, a
Ensure consis
ernments (DR
Master Plan (2
er Plan (Castl
ment of the tr
he existing tra
accommodate
stle Rock TMP
e the developm
n Master Plan
Master Plan (Lo
y 2040 Transp
mendations fro
Lone Tree 2040
e transportati
ents necessary
es.
er Plan (2014)
Master Plan (Pa
es policy guida
R PLAN
5
ms:
ments (overtur
) crashes at in
ctions
of Douglas Co
elop an efficien
nd facilitate c
stency betwee
RCOG) 2040 Re
2017)
e Rock TMP) p
ransportation
ansportation s
e land use plan
considers a w
ment of a com
(2019)
one Tree TMP
portation Mast
om the Dougla
0 TMP is to pr
on network in
y to continue
arker TMP) se
ance and artic
ning, fixed obj
ntersections
ounty. The Ca
nt, multi-funct
cost-effective
en the Dougla
egional Transp
provides a gui
network in Ca
system and to
ns documente
wide range of
plete transpor
P) was prepare
ter Plan. Inform
s County TMP
rovide a guidin
n Lone Tree. Th
the developm
rves as the To
culates overal
Sec I. Introd
ject crashes,
stle Pines Com
tional transpo
operations an
s County 2030
portation Plan
iding framewo
astle Rock. Th
o analyze futur
ed in the Town
transportation
rtation system
ed collaborativ
mation gather
P were used to
ng framework
his TMP consi
ment of a comp
own’s long-ran
l transportatio
duction and Co
head-on and
mprehensive P
ortation netwo
nd maintenanc
0 Transportat
n, and local
ork for the
e purpose of t
re transportat
n of Castle Ro
n network
m that integrat
vely and
red, travel
o inform the Lo
for the contin
ders a wide ra
plete transport
nge plan for tr
on policies, go
ontext
Plan
ork
ce.”
ion
this
ion
ck
tes all
one
nued
ange
tation
ravel
als,
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
strategies
Parker TM
transporta
DRCOG 20
Transporta
DRCOG is
charged w
which pres
and demo
is the 204
Specificall
20 years b
Planning a
Study (201
The purpo
efficiently
Basin in no
improvem
concerns;
2002 Sout
US 85 Hig
In May 20
CDOT 200
FEIS/ROD
then, Doug
construct
addition, f
The Purpo
The purpo
inadequac
impacts.
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
and priorities
P is used to a
ation capacity
040 Metro Visi
ation Plan (20
the designate
with developing
sents the regi
graphic trends
0 FCRTP, whic
ly, the 2040 F
based on reas
and Environme
16)
se of this stud
meet the futu
orthwest Dou
ents is center
and lack of m
th I-25 Corrido
hlands Ranch
01, CDOT and
01). A Record o
D outlined a se
glas County ha
six segments
unding has be
ose and Need e
se of the FEIS
cies and safety
ANSPORTATIO
s that were de
lign transport
aligns with th
ion Region Tra
40 FCRTP)
ed metropolita
g a long-range
on’s vision for
s. This vision i
ch addresses
CRTP defines
onably expect
ental Linkages
dy was to iden
ure multimoda
glas County, a
red on the follo
multimodal fac
or, and US 85
Parkway to C
FHWA comple
of Decision (RO
et of improvem
as helped prov
of the Selecte
een provided t
elements for t
S/ROD was to
y problems in
ION MASTER
veloped throu
ation decision
he community
ansportation P
an planning org
e regional tran
r a multimoda
is not constra
federal requir
transportatio
ted revenues.
s (PEL) Report
ntify necessar
al travel dema
anticipated to
owing factors
ilities and con
Corridor Reco
C-470 (2017)
eted the Sout
OD) was signe
ments to addre
vide funding t
ed Alternative
to improve sec
the Reevaluat
develop a tra
the US 85 cor
R PLAN
6
ugh a public pr
ns with future
’s land use an
Plan (MVRTP) a
ganization for
nsportation pla
l transportatio
ined by financ
rements for a
n elements an
for the Dougl
ry improvemen
nds on US 85
occur beyond
: inadequate c
nections.
ord of Decision
h I-25/US 85
ed in 2002 tha
ess transporta
o CDOT to com
e inclusive of w
ctions of I-25.
ion were ident
ansportation s
rridor while av
rocess inform
development
nd economic d
and 2040 Fisc
the Denver re
an. The MVRT
on system nee
cial limitations
long-range tra
nd services to
las County US
nts to the US
associated w
d the 2040 tim
capacity; exist
n Re-evaluatio
Final Environm
at identified a
ation needs fo
mbine with th
wildlife crossin
tical to those
olution that ad
voiding or min
Sec I. Introd
ed by technic
impacts and
development g
cally Constrain
egion. As such
TP is a fiscally
eded to respo
s. Incorporated
ansportation p
be provided o
S 85 Corridor I
85 Corridor to
with the buildo
me frame. The
ting access co
on and Section
mental Impac
Selected Alter
r a 2020 horiz
eir own fundin
ngs from the F
identified in th
ddresses tran
imizing advers
duction and Co
al expertise. T
to analyze how
goals.
ned Regional
h, it is federall
constrained p
nd to future g
d within the M
plan (Chapter
over the next
mprovements
o safely and
ut of the Chat
need for the
oncerns; safet
n 4(f) Evaluatio
t Statement (
rnative. The
zon year. Since
ng to design a
FEIS/ROD. In
he FEIS/ROD.
sportation ca
se environme
ontext
The
w
y
plan,
rowth
MVRTP
5).
s
tfield
ty
on:
FEIS;
e
and
.
pacity
ntal
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
I-25 PEL: C
As the onl
centers an
470 exper
have led t
In August
between C
highway. T
address sp
process, a
which was
I-25 South
The propo
direction b
lane capac
also widen
emergenc
crossings
StakeStakehold
communit
needs ass
The stake
needs, com
the comm
of opportu
P
w
al
im
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
Colorado Sprin
y north-south
nd provides ac
iences conges
o long periods
2016, CDOT la
Colorado Sprin
The purpose o
pecific safety
an identified ea
s accelerated
h Gap Project
sed action for
between Monu
city with the a
n shoulders to
y response, as
at strategic lo
eholder er engagemen
y‘s transporta
sociated with t
holder engage
mmon interest
unity’s transp
unities to prov
roject web pa
www.2040Doug
llowed comme
mportance and
ANSPORTATIO
ngs Denver So
route through
ccess to recre
stion, high spe
s of highway d
aunched the In
ngs and south
of the I-25 PEL
concerns and
arly action ite
and construct
Monument to
r the I-25 Sout
ument and Ca
adjoining 3-lan
o provide safe
s well as redu
ocations.
Engagent and commu
ation vision. Do
the differing a
ement and com
ts, and values
portation vision
ide input:
age A projec
gCoTMP.com.
ents to be sub
d reason for th
ION MASTER
outh Connectio
h Colorado, Int
ational areas.
eeds, steeper
delays.
nterstate 25 P
Denver to ide
L is to identify
d provide incre
m was the I-2
tion began in A
south of Cast
th Gap Environ
stle Rock. This
ne sections no
space for disa
ce wildlife/ve
ment anunity outreach
ouglas County
reas within th
mmunity outre
s held by citize
n. The followin
ct page was c
This web pag
bmitted at all t
he planning pr
R PLAN
7
on (Underway
terstate 25 co
The section
grades, and w
Planning and E
entify immedia
improvement
eased travel re
5 South Gap P
August 2018.
tle Rock (Unde
nmental Asses
s action will a
orth and south
abled vehicles
ehicle collision
nd Comh informed the
y’s broad and
he County requ
each effort for
ens and stake
ng efforts wer
created on the
ge served to m
times. The site
ocess, backgr
y)
onnects major
of Interstate 2
wildlife contrib
Environmental
ate and long-t
ts along this c
eliability for th
Project: Monu
er constructio
ssment (EA) is
ddress the ex
h along the cor
s, maintenanc
ns by adding s
munity e Douglas Cou
diverse geogr
uired a wide n
r the 2040 TM
holders in ord
re used to gat
e County’s web
maximize publi
e provided info
round, and pu
Sec I. Introd
r population ce
25 between M
buting to seve
Linkages (I-2
erm solutions
orridor, to enh
he public. Thro
ument to sout
n)
s to add one t
xisting bottlen
rridor. The pro
e, law-enforce
several wildlife
Outreacnty 2040 TMP
raphical area a
net to gather in
MP was design
er to develop
her input and
b site:
c access to in
ormation rega
blic engagem
duction and Co
enters, employ
Monument and
re crashes wh
5 PEL) study
s for this stretc
hance mobility
ough the I-25 P
h of Castle Ro
ravel lane in e
eck and balan
oposed action
ement, and
e grade separa
ch P as to the
and the divers
nput.
ned to discove
and understa
inform the pu
nformation and
arding the
ent opportunit
ontext
yment
d C-
hich
ch of
y,
PEL
ock,
each
nce
will
ated
se
r
nd
ublic
d
ties.
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
C
w
ne
ne
P
op
C
di
an
O
R
C
th
an
to
an
re
hu
Te
en
ac
pl
A
le
w
Utilizin
TMP w
Count
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
ounty news b
was sent to a la
ews, multimod
ews media, so
ublic open ho
pportunity to r
ounty traffic e
ifferent locatio
nd Parker.
nline survey
espondents w
ounty, list loca
he existing tra
n interactive m
o the County in
nd provided a
esulting in ove
undreds of int
elephone Tow
ngage from th
cross the Cou
lanning effort.
final public m
earn more abo
website for pub
ng all of these
with a strong u
ty.
ANSPORTATIO
blast – An intr
arge audience
dal transporta
ocial media, an
ouse meeting
review existin
engineers, plan
ons across the
– An interacti
were asked to
ations in great
nsportation sy
map comment
n Geographic
modern way f
er 600 specific
terested partie
wn Hall – A te
he comfort of t
nty, which inf
. Members of t
meeting was
ut the draft 20
blic review and
e stakeholder e
understanding
ION MASTER
roduction to th
e through vario
ation, and pers
nd posted on t
gs – Three ope
g and forecas
nners and pro
e County as a
ve online surv
select their to
test need of im
ystem and imp
ting tool, and r
Information S
for people to e
c comments, t
es for future u
elephone town
their own hom
ormed many p
the public wer
held July 10, 2
040 TMP that
d comment sin
engagement a
g of the divers
R PLAN
8
he 2040 TMP
ous County co
sonal and publ
the home pag
en house meet
sted conditions
ject team mem
convenience
vey was availa
op three priorit
mprovements,
provements m
results of loca
ystem (GIS) fo
engage at the
thousands of r
se.
n hall meeting
me. Thousands
people who ot
re also able to
2019 in Castle
was out for re
nce June 17, 2
and communit
se needs assoc
planning effor
ommunication
lic safety subs
e of the Coun
tings were he
s information
mbers. These
for residents:
able for approx
ties for improv
, and share ad
most importan
ation-specific
ormat. The su
ir convenienc
responses to q
was held to p
s of calls were
therwise woul
o pre-register
e Rock to prov
eferral and po
2019.
ty outreach op
ciated with th
Sec I. Introd
rt and request
channels, inc
scription blast
ty’s site.
eld to provide a
and discuss t
meetings we
Highlands Ra
ximately two m
ving transport
dditional comm
t to them. The
comments we
rvey was mob
e. Over 500 p
questions, and
provide people
e placed to reg
ld not have he
to participate
ide citizens th
osted on the D
pportunities p
he differing are
duction and Co
t for participat
cluding breakin
t lists, release
attendees an
their priorities
re held in thre
anch, Roxboro
months.
tation in the
ments regardin
e survey includ
ere then availa
bile device-frie
eople particip
d a database o
e an option to
gistered voter
eard about the
in the call.
he opportunity
Douglas County
rovided the 20
eas within the
ontext
tion
ng
ed to
with
ee
ugh,
ng
ded
able
endly,
pated,
of
s
e
y to
y
040
e
September 2019 9 Sec II. Existing Conditions
SECTION II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Data describing the transportation facilities and services in the County were developed through an evaluation
of the existing transportation system. The following sections describe the existing roadway system, transit
services, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities throughout Douglas County. Transportation projects included in
the current County Capital Improvement Program are included to represent the current and upcoming
commitments to improve our roadway network. GIS was used to collect, store, refine, manipulate and present
transportation facilities as well as the associated operational and descriptive attributes.
Roadway System ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION Urban and rural areas have fundamental different characteristics with regard to density of road networks,
land use, and travel patterns. Consequently, roadway types are established within a functional classification
system to reflect the diverse influences and characteristics of roads within Douglas County. The Douglas
County Engineering Division has adopted a Functional Street Classification Plan (FSCP) based on projected
traffic volumes, land use and expected growth levels. The FSCP incorporates the minimum design, technical
criteria and specifications to be used for both urban and rural roadway facilities. This FSCP is documented in
Chapter 4 of the Douglas County Roadway Design and Technical Criteria
(https://www.douglas.co.us/documents/rwd-design-and-technical-criteria.pdf.
The designated streets addressed within this TMP include those with higher volumes and capacities, while
the lower volume local street are not reflected. Table 1 identifies the TMP roadway functional classification
identified for both Urban and Rural areas.
Table 1: Roadway Functional Classification
ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION
Urban Area Rural Area
Major Collector Rural Collector
Minor Arterial Rural Arterial (2 and 4 lanes)
Major Arterial (4 and 6 lanes)
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
Urban Roa
Major Coll
mobility th
have direc
Arterials is
Minor Arte
Access is
arterials s
roadways.
Major Arte
generally l
on the sur
network ro
Rural Road
Rural Colle
the County
areas. Rur
Rural colle
land uses.
Rural Arte
Rural Arte
especially
during pea
often the r
Although n
state high
between c
access all
allowed pr
Figure 1 d
Douglas C
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
adways
ector streets s
han arterials a
ct access depe
s prohibited.
erials are road
restricted wit
erve major tra
.
erials provide a
limited with an
rrounding land
oadways and
dways
ector streets a
y. These facili
ral collectors m
ector roads in
rial Roadways
rials serve a m
in rural/urba
ak commuting
result of cong
not included w
ways and exp
communities. S
owed only at
rimarily at maj
displays the ex
County.
ANSPORTATIO
serve interme
nd operate at
ending on the
s that serve m
h spacing sta
affic generator
a high level of
n infrequent n
d use. Land us
inter-parcel c
are the primar
ties typically h
may be miles l
the County ar
s provide conn
mix of rural-to
n fringe areas
time periods.
estion on urba
within the Dou
pressways ser
State highway
interchanges.
jor intersectio
xisting roadwa
ION MASTER
ediate and sho
lower speeds
surrounding l
moderate spee
ndards betwe
rs or large lan
f mobility at hi
number of inte
es adjacent to
onnections.
ry link betwee
have higher sp
long because
re sometimes
nections to ne
-urban and fa
, accommoda
This is not th
an arterials
glas County R
rve Douglas Co
ys and expres
State highwa
ns.
ay functional c
R PLAN
10
ort-distance tr
s. These roads
and use. Resi
ed and higher
een intersectio
d areas and li
gher speeds f
rsections and
o major arteria
n the local str
peeds and lon
of large parce
the only facilit
ighboring citie
rm-to-market
te significant
e intended fu
Rodway Design
ounty resident
sways provide
ays/expressw
classification a
avel. Collecto
s connect loca
dential drivew
traffic volume
ons and limited
nk collector st
for relatively lo
d little or no dir
als should gen
reet system an
ger trip length
els and a relat
ties available
es and betwee
traffic. In som
amounts of u
nction of the r
n and Technic
ts providing p
e the greatest
ways also serve
and number o
Sec II.
rs provide a lo
al roads to arte
way access to
es over moder
d direct prope
treets with th
ong distances
rect property
nerally be serv
nd arterials in
hs than collec
ively sparse s
for access to
en urban and
me cases, rura
rban-to-urban
rural arterial d
cal Criteria, int
rimarily long‐d
t mobility, with
e regional traf
f lanes on roa
Existing Cond
ower level of
erials and may
Major Collect
rate distances
erty access. M
e major arteri
s. Access is
access, depen
ved by other
the rural area
tor streets in
street network
dispersed rur
rural areas. M
al arterials,
n through-traff
designation an
terstate freew
distance trave
h strictly cont
ffic, with acce
adways within
ditions
y
ors or
s.
inor
al
nding
as of
urban
k.
ral
Most
fic
nd is
ways,
el
rolled
ess
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
MultimMultimoda
create a c
existing co
pedestrian
roadway n
Douglas C
moves veh
the transp
Bicycle a
Bicycling a
of transpo
balanced t
the existin
street bike
for both co
access to
located wi
Aurora, Ca
Transit S
Existing tr
Transporta
(Bustang)
currently n
County an
into Dougl
RTD recen
past Linco
As part of
as the reg
transit ser
population
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
modal Fal facilities and
ohesive trans
onditions of al
n, and transit.
network provid
County. Having
hicles efficien
portation need
and Pedestri
and walking p
ortation also as
transportation
ng bicycle and
e lanes, and bo
ommuter and
major destina
ithin more urb
astle Pines, Ca
Services
ransit service
ation District (
along I-25.Th
no stops withi
d regional rou
as County wit
ntly completed
oln Station to t
the transit de
ional backbon
rvices betwee
n may make in
ANSPORTATIO
Facilitiesd services pro
portation syst
lternative trav
This multimod
ding the full co
g a balanced m
tly through th
s of the Coun
an Facilities
rovide healthy
ssist the Coun
n system by pr
pedestrian tr
oth paved and
recreational p
ations and rec
ban areas in th
astle Rock, Litt
is provided by
(RTD), and loc
e Bustang Sou
n Douglas Cou
utes, which ex
th stops at the
d construction
the new Ridge
emand analysi
ne for transit s
n the major ci
ntra-city trans
ION MASTER
s and Seovide opportun
tem that move
vel modes that
dal system co
omplement of
multimodal sys
e use of an In
ty’s diverse us
s
y alternatives
nty in reducing
roviding additi
ansportation n
d natural surfa
purposes. The
reational oppo
he northern pa
tleton, Lone T
y the Colorado
al companies.
uth Line opera
unty. RTD mai
xtend as far so
e County Line
n of a 2.3 mile
eGate Station.
s conducted b
services. Howe
ities within the
it more viable
R PLAN
11
ervicesnities to conne
es people safe
t are an impor
mbines with t
transportatio
stem that con
telligent Trans
sers.
to the automo
g congestion,
ional modal ch
network cons
ace multi-use
regional trails
ortunities. Muc
art of the Coun
ree and Parke
o Department o
. As shown in
ates between
intains local b
outh as the Pin
station near P
extension of t
Full service t
by the County
ever, the plan
e County. Incr
in the future.
ect different m
ely and efficie
rtant compone
the Intelligent
n facilities, se
siders pedest
sportation Sys
obile for many
improving air
hoices to more
ists of attache
trails. This ne
s connect citie
ch of the bicy
nty and adjace
er.
of Transportat
Figure 3, CDO
Colorado Spri
bus routes thro
nery. The RTD
Park Meadows
the Southeast
to the RidgeGa
in 2016, I-25
also identifie
reasing traffic
In addition, b
Sec II.
modes of trave
ntly. This sect
ent of the TMP
Transportatio
ervices and co
rian, bicycle, a
stem (ITS), sig
y types of trips
quality, and d
e people. As s
ed and detach
twork serves
es within the C
cle and pedes
ent to Cities a
tion (CDOT), t
OT offers regio
ings and Denv
oughout north
Southeast lig
s Mall and at t
t light rail line
ate Station be
is expected to
d the need for
congestion a
oth CDOT and
Existing Cond
el together to
tion describes
P including bic
on System for
onnections in
and transit an
gnificantly sup
s. This active
developing a m
shown in Figur
hed sidewalks
a range of us
County and pr
strian assets a
nd Towns suc
he Regional
onal bus servi
ver but there a
hern Douglas
ght rail line ext
the Lincoln Sta
providing serv
egan May 2019
o continue to s
r point-to-poin
nd an aging
d RTD continue
ditions
s the
cycle,
the
d
pports
mode
more
re 2,
s, on
ers
rovide
are
ch as
ice
are
tends
ation.
vice
9.
serve
nt
e to
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
evaluate t
Rapid Tran
In addition
These are
disabled a
City of Lon
limits. Link
direction a
Intelligen
The Count
network d
reliability.
times, and
does not e
traffic sign
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
he need for in
nsit (BRT).
n to the routes
too numerous
and elderly pop
ne Tree provid
k On Demand
and books the
nt Transport
ty maintains a
evices. Many
There are also
d variable mes
end at our bou
nal timing and
ANSPORTATIO
ncreased and e
s offered by CD
s to list, but of
pulations as w
des a free shut
is an on-dema
m into a share
tation Syste
traffic manag
of the traffic s
o cameras for
ssage signs fo
undaries. Doug
traffic operat
ION MASTER
enhanced tran
DOT and RTD,
ften consist o
well as call and
ttle, Link On D
and travel con
ed vehicle. Th
ms (ITS)
gement center
signals are co
traffic detect
r traveler info
glas County pa
tions.
R PLAN
12
nsit services s
there are spe
f private entit
d ride services
Demand, which
ncept that take
e shuttles can
r with commu
nnected via fi
tion and incide
rmation. The c
artners with C
such as high-s
ecialized trans
ties providing
s like those off
h provides tra
es multiple pa
n accommoda
unication to all
iber optics, wh
ent response,
commitment t
CDOT and neig
Sec II.
speed passeng
sit services wi
targeted serv
fered by the T
nsport service
assengers hea
te up to 12 pe
l County traffic
hich improves
Bluetooth dev
to travelers in
ghboring jurisd
Existing Cond
ger rail and Bu
ithin the Coun
ices for the
Town of Parke
es within the c
ading in the sa
eople.
c signals and
s speed and
vices for trave
Douglas Coun
dictions on reg
ditions
us
nty.
r. The
city
ame
el
nty
gional
DOUGLAS COUNTY 2040 TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN
September 2019 13 Sec II. Existing Conditions
FFigure 1: Existing Roadway Network
DOUGLA
Septemb
AS COUNTY
ber 2019
Y 2040 TRANS
SPORTATIONN MASTER PLLAN
14
Figure 22: Existing BFacilities
Sec II. Ex
Bicycle and
xisting Conditi
Pedestrian
ons
DOUGLA
Septemb
AS COUNTY
ber 2019
Y 2040 TRANSSPORTATIONN MASTER PLLAN
15
Figure 3: Exist
Tran
Sec II. Ex
ting and Plansit Services
xisting Conditi
nned s
ons
DOUGLA
Septemb
AS COUNTY
ber 2019
Y 2040 TRANSSPORTATIONN MASTER PLLAN
This p
16
page intentionaally blank
Sec II. Exxisting Conditi
ons
Septembe
SECT
MethoA travel de
the input o
demand p
the roadw
prioritizati
The DRCO
roadway f
including D
household
the associ
The evalua
roadway s
networks
developme
accuracy o
LAND US
The Count
The house
for the Co
2030 and
Ta
er 2019
TION II
odologyemand model
of land use for
laced on the t
way system. Th
on as part of c
G Focus 2.1 T
acilities throu
Douglas Coun
ds and jobs; ex
iated transit s
ation first focu
system will de
were develop
ent base year
of the travel d
SE
ty horizon yea
ehold and job i
unty. Table 2
2040.
able 2: Total
H
I. TRAV
y Overvifor Douglas C
r each plannin
transportation
he Douglas Co
capital progra
ravel Demand
ghout Douglas
ty. This travel
xisting and pla
ystem.
used on the ho
velop over tim
ed for the 202
2015 travel d
demand model
r land use inp
information w
below provide
Households
HORIZON
2020
2030
2040
VEL DE
ew County was pre
ng horizon, alo
system. It pro
ounty travel de
mming.
d Model was u
s County. The
demand mod
anned roadwa
orizon year 20
me. Following t
20 and 2030 t
emand foreca
l. The validatio
uts utilized fo
as allocated b
es the Dougla
s and Emplo
TOTAL H
128
16
20
17
EMAND
epared as part
ng with an as
ovides output
emand model
sed to develo
DRCOG mode
el develops fo
ys and how m
040 network n
the developme
ime horizons.
asts were com
on of the trave
r the TMP wer
by the DRCOG
s County tota
oyment Proje
OUSEHOLDS
8,878
7,315
1,962
Sec
D DEVE
t of the TMP u
ssumed roadw
in the form of
is used for Co
p daily vehicu
el encompasse
orecasts base
much traffic th
needs to ensur
ent of the 204
As part of the
mpared to actu
el demand mo
re developed a
traffic analys
l household an
ections for 2
TO
1
1
2
c III. Travel De
ELOPME
update. The m
way network, t
f estimated tr
ounty roadway
ular forecasts
es the entire D
d on the dens
ey can accom
re a complete
40 road netwo
e travel deman
ual ground cou
odel is discuss
and provided
sis zone (TAZ)
nd job project
2020, 2030,
TAL JOBS
123,406
168,535
220,276
mand Develop
ENT
model provides
o assess the t
affic volumes
y planning proj
on the primary
Denver region
sity and locatio
mmodate, as w
and integrate
ork, phased ro
nd model
unts to validat
sed in Append
by Douglas Co
structure iden
ions for 2020,
and 2040
pment
s for
travel
on
ject
y
n,
on of
well as
ed
ad
te the
ix B.
ounty.
ntified
,
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
Appendix
displaying
metropolit
ROAD NE
A primary
Douglas C
this in min
review of t
agencies a
DRCOG U
UrbanSim
the interac
explore th
outcomes
emissions
DRCOG’s U
The Focus
model trip
and develo
transit, an
The Dougl
processing
ROADWA
Roadway c
of service.
of the road
Planners a
transporta
represents
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
C provides a
the TAZ struc
tan region wer
ETWORK DE
goal for the T
County. These
nd, the develop
the past plann
and jurisdictio
URBANSIM
is a simulatio
ctions betwee
e effects of in
, such as mot
and the prote
UrbanSim mod
s 2.1 model est
generation as
opment patter
d integrates c
as County 202
g resulting in s
AY CAPACIT
capacity can b
. Roadway cap
dway coupled
and engineers
ation facilities.
s the best con
ANSPORTATIO
tabular summ
cture. The DRC
re utilized for t
EVELOPMEN
MP is to deve
recommendat
pment of the D
ning documen
ns.
MODEL SUM
n system for s
en land use, tr
nfrastructure a
orized and non
ection of open
del are used a
timates are th
ssumed either
rn sensitivity,
complex perso
20, 2030 and
socioeconomi
TIES
be defined as
pacity as a pla
with the avai
use a measu
. Similar to gra
nditions and F
ION MASTER
mary of the lan
COG socio-eco
the TMP.
NT SUMMAR
lop implement
tions reflect in
Douglas Coun
ts summarize
MMARY
supporting pla
ansportation,
and developm
n-motorized a
n space and en
as inputs to th
he result of “to
r home- or wo
includes cons
on level decisio
2040 land use
c datasets inc
the maximum
anning utility d
lable number
rement called
ades in school
represents fa
R PLAN
18
d use inputs u
onomic horizo
RY
table roadway
ntegration wit
ty 2040 trans
ed in Section I,
anning and an
the economy,
ent constraint
accessibility, h
nvironmentally
e regional trav
our”, or linked-
ork-based orig
sideration of n
on making.
e forecasts we
corporated int
m traffic volum
depends on th
of through lan
Level of Serv
l, LOS is score
ailure. Table 3
Sec
used for the h
on year forecas
y recommenda
h local agency
sportation netw
, as well as co
alysis of urba
, and the envir
ts, as well as
housing afford
y sensitive ha
vel demand m
-trip generatio
ins. The Focus
non-motorized
ere provided t
to the respect
me that a roadw
he anticipated
nes.
vice (LOS) to g
ed using letter
defines the v
c III. Travel De
orizon years a
sts for the res
ations through
y and jurisdict
work required
oordination wit
n developmen
ronment. It is
other policies
ability, greenh
bitats. The for
model, Focus 2
on, while the f
s 2.1 model al
modes and w
to DRCOG for
ive travel dem
way can carry
future functio
gauge the adeq
rs from A to F,
vehicular level
mand Develop
along with a m
st of the Denv
hout
tion plans. Kee
an extensive
th the local
nt, incorporatin
designed to
on communit
house gas
recasts from
.1.
ormer Compa
so has time-o
walk access to
UrbanSim pos
mand model.
y at a desired l
onal classifica
quacy of
, where A
s of service.
pment
map
er
eping
ng
ty
ss
f-day
o
st-
level
ation
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
VEHICULAR LOF SERVICE (
LOS A
LOS B
LOS C
LOS D
LOS E
LOS F
Developin
establishe
LOS C for
County roa
Average d
estimated
document
urban and
type.
In order to
forecasted
capacities
designate
and/or ap
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
LEVEL
LOS)
Free-f
Stable
Stable
Stable
Unsta
Unsta
g and maintai
ed LOS thresho
arterial and co
adways and e
aily traffic vol
based on typ
ed in various
semi-urban d
ROA
No1
o maintain acc
d daily traffic v
s for the assoc
d County LOS
proach the Co
ANSPORTATIO
Ta
flow vehicular
e flow with the
e flow; howev
e flow with res
able flow at or
able flow; stop
ning a safe tra
olds of LOS D
ollector roadw
nsures operat
ume capacitie
ical traffic flow
regional and lo
daily capacitie
Table 4: R
ADWAY CLASSI
Major Collec
Minor Arter
Major Arter
Expresswa
t currently identi1. Major Collecto2. Expressway
ceptable levels
volumes for ea
ciated roadwa
threshold. Ro
ounty LOS thre
ION MASTER
able 3: Vehic
r traffic; vehic
e ability of veh
ver monitoring
stricted speed
near capacity
p and go condi
ansportation s
for arterial an
ways in rural a
tions do not be
es of roads in
w characterist
ocal agency s
s, by roadway
Recommende
IFICATION
ctor
rial
rial
ay
fied in Douglas Cor (4-lane)
s of service fo
ach roadway s
ys to determin
oadways segm
eshold were id
R PLAN
19
cular Level o
DE
les moving fre
hicles to choo
of speed and
d and ability to
y; experiencin
itions.
system to add
nd collector roa
reas. This LOS
ecome unstab
urban and sem
tics and capac
tudies throug
y classification
ed Traffic Vo
2
LOS D
12,000
County Roadway
r both the urb
segment were
ne if they wer
ments with traf
dentified for p
Sec
of Service
FINITION
eely.
ose speed and
lane changes
o change lane
g increased d
dress present
adways in urb
S criteria prov
ble.
mi-urban area
cities per hou
hout the Unite
n, based on th
olume Thres
URBAN
NUMBER OF
4
LOS
0 20,00
30,00
40,00
50,00
Standards.
ban and rural a
e compared to
e exceeding a
ffic volumes t
hased improv
c III. Travel De
/or lane.
s of vehicles is
s.
elays and red
and future de
ban and semi-
ides safety an
as, by classific
r per lane that
ed States. Tab
he number of l
sholds
N
LANES
6
D LOS
00
00
00 55,00
00 70,00
areas of the C
o the designat
and/or approa
that are foreca
vement.
mand Develop
s required.
uced traveler
mands the Co
urban areas a
nd mobility on
cation, were
t have been
ble 4 presents
anes and area
D
00
00
ounty the
ted daily roadw
aching the
asted to excee
pment
reliability.
ounty
and
the
s the
a
way
ed
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
TraveThe purpo
and design
and for alt
To ensure
Cooperativ
year mode
adjusted a
HORIZON
Utilizing th
Douglas C
for the 202
Figures 4
A network
forecasted
classificat
exceeding
the resulta
years, resp
The 2020
help facilit
implement
HORIZON
Horizon ye
This iterat
that a com
The 2040
traffic volu
County. Th
Douglas C
The result
the primar
standard 2
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
el Forecase of the TMP
n. These forec
ternatives ana
the highest le
ve Highway R
el outputs to c
accordingly, re
N YEARS 20
he land use da
County and loc
20 and 2030 p
and 5.
k performance
d traffic volum
tions. This pro
g the specified
ant ADT volum
pectively.
and 2030 hor
tate a determi
tation of the r
N YEAR 204
ear 2040 traffi
ive process w
mplete and inte
daily traffic ro
umes to deter
his network pe
County 2040 ro
ant 2040 daily
ry roadways w
20-year plann
ANSPORTATIO
asts andP travel foreca
casts are utiliz
alyses.
evel of accura
esearch Progr
counted traffic
esulting in 202
020 AND 20
ata provided b
al agency and
planning horiz
evaluation w
mes to the LOS
cess allowed
d LOS threshol
mes and roadw
izon year fore
ination of whe
ecommended
40
ic forecasts w
was conducted
egrated roadw
oadway foreca
mine the appr
erformance ev
oadway system
y traffic volum
within Douglas
ing horizon fo
ION MASTER
d Netwoasts is to produ
zed to determi
cy of the trav
ram Report 76
c volumes. Fut
20, 2030 and 2
30
y Douglas Cou
d jurisdiction s
on years. The
as conducted
S daily traffic t
the determina
d volume for t
way network p
cast developm
en specific roa
2040 roadwa
were developed
d in order to id
way system ca
asts were com
ropriate 2040
valuation proc
m discussed i
mes shown in F
s County. The 2
r major roadw
R PLAN
20
ork Perfuce future ave
ne the need o
el forecasts, t
65 (NCHRP Re
ture travel fore
2040 ADT volu
unty and base
staff, future av
base 2020 an
for each of th
threshold volu
ation where AD
the correspon
performance e
ment and netw
adway improve
ay network.
d followed by
dentify the rec
an be impleme
mpared to the
roadway lane
ess facilitated
n the followin
Figure 8 depic
2040 forecast
way improveme
Sec
formancerage daily tra
of a project, nu
the procedure
port 765) wer
ecasts for eac
umes.
e road network
verage daily tr
nd 2030 roadw
he planning ho
ume for the co
DT volumes w
nding roadway
evaluation for t
work performa
ements would
an initial netw
commended 20
ented over tim
established d
eage for the pr
d the developm
g section.
ct the anticipa
t traffic volum
ents.
c III. Travel De
ce
affic volumes f
umber of road
s documented
e utilized to co
ch planning ho
k assumptions
raffic forecast
way networks
orizon years b
orresponding r
would be appro
y type. Figures
the 2020 and
ance evaluatio
d be needed a
work performa
040 roadway
me.
aily roadway L
rimary roadwa
ment of the re
ated 2040 veh
mes provide th
mand Develop
for use in plan
way lanes nee
d in the nation
ompare the ba
orizon were
s as reviewed
ts were prepar
are illustrated
y comparing t
roadway funct
oaching and/o
s 6 and 7 illus
2030 horizon
on were used t
s part of the
ance evaluatio
network to en
LOS threshold
ays within the
ecommended
hicular deman
e basis for the
pment
nning
eded
nal
ase
by
red
d in
the
tional
or
trate
to
on.
nsure
d
nd on
e
DOUGLAS
Septembe
AS COUNTY 20
er 2019
2040 TRANSPPORTATION MMASTER PLAAN
21 Sec III.
Figure 4:
Travel Deman
2020 Roadw
nd Developme
way Networ
nt
k
DOUGLAS COUNTY 2040 TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN
September 2019 22 Sec III. Travel Demand Development
FFigure 5: 2030 Roadway Network
DOUGLAS COUNTY 2040 TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN
September 2019 23 Sec III. Travel Demand Development
FFigure 6: 2020 Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
Volumes and Network Performance
DOUGLAS
Septembe
AS COUNTY 20
er 2019
2040 TRANSPPORTATION MMASTER PLAAN
24
Figure 7: 2V
Sec III.
2030 AveragVolumes and
Travel Deman
ge Daily Trafd Network P
nd Developme
ffic (ADT) erformance
nt
DOUGLAS COUNTY 2040 TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN
September 2019 25 Sec III. Travel Demand Development
FFigure 8: 2040 Average Daily
Traffic (ADT) Volumes
DOUGLAS
Septembe
AS COUNTY 20
er 2019
2040 TRANSPPORTATION MMASTER PLAAN
This
26
page intentionnally blank
Sec III. Travel Demannd Developme
nt
Septembe
SECTSYST
Once the t
Douglas C
the roadw
trends like
travel dem
transporta
agency an
RoadwThe recom
transporta
Figure 9,
componen
standards
demand re
Evaluation
include:
En
be
G
in
Evaluation
include:
S
A
A
P
er 2019
TION IVTEM PL
transportation
County is deve
way network, b
ely to impact t
mand is an imp
ation system. T
nd jurisdiction
way Sysmmended road
ation network.
constitutes a
nt of the netw
. Future roadw
eaches LOS D
n of future roa
nhancements
e maximized.
rade separatio
ntersection ca
n of future roa
houlder impro
reas for passi
ccommodatin
roviding safe a
V. RECOLAN
n demand is kn
loped, focusin
bicycle and ped
he TMP into t
portant consid
The TMP prov
transportation
stem dway system i
The roadway
system for me
ork is anticipa
way corridors
traffic volume
dway improve
to the cross s
on and/or alte
pacity, such a
dway improve
ovements to im
ng slow movin
g bicyclists
access to and
OMME
nown the reco
ng on the entir
destrian facilit
he future. The
deration in the
vides an efficie
n plans to pro
dentified in th
y system ident
eeting anticipa
ated to meet D
will require co
e thresholds.
ements to mit
street facilitie
ernative inters
as a continuou
ements to mit
mprove travele
ng vehicles
d from residen
27 Sec
NDED
ommended 20
re County. The
ties and trans
e provision of a
development
ent transporta
vide Countyw
his TMP is a co
tified by the cl
ated travel ne
Douglas Count
ontinued moni
igate projecte
s in order to a
section concep
us flow interse
igate projecte
er safety with
tial access po
IV. Recommen
TRANS
040 transporta
e recommenda
sit services as
adequate faci
t of the recom
ation system t
wide connectiv
omponent of a
assification a
eeds. In genera
ty mobility thre
toring and eva
ed travel dema
allow signal tim
pts along urba
ection or displa
ed travel dema
the increase
oints
nded Transpo
SPORTA
ation system p
ations include
well as antici
lities to satisf
mended multi
hat is integrat
vity.
an integrated m
nd laneage m
al, the recomm
esholds and o
aluation as th
and on an Urba
ming, and asso
an corridors to
aced left turn.
and on a Rural
in recovery ar
rtation System
ATION
plan for
e improvement
ipated emergi
fy the forecast
imodal
ted with local
multimodal
ap presented
mended roadw
operating
e projected tr
an Roadway m
ociated capac
o increase
.
l Roadway ma
rea
m Plan
ts for
ng
ted
in
way
avel
may
city to
ay
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
MultimThis sectio
Having a b
componen
BICYCLE
The Count
alternative
To continu
and local j
close gaps
interested
enhancem
As shown
nearly fifte
section of
(8') wide m
An additio
RidgeGate
Sterling Ra
along Rox
As funding
paved mu
traverse 14
2030 with
TRANSIT
Douglas C
Future imp
Express B
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
modal Fon describes t
balanced mult
nt to the plan.
E AND PEDE
ty encourages
e to the autom
ue the expans
urisdictions n
s in regional tr
d in trail conne
ments identifie
in Figure 10,
een (15) miles
the East/We
multi-use trail
nal ten (10) pr
e Parkway from
anch developm
borough Park
g allows, nearl
lti-use trail pa
4.5 miles. Pha
the completio
T
County will con
provements m
us Service, co
ANSPORTATIO
Facilitiesthe proposed e
imodal system
ESTRIAN
s bicycle and p
mobile.
ion of the bicy
ear the bound
rails. Citizen s
ectivity, safety
d by the Coun
five (5) bicycl
of new trails.
st trail betwee
will connect t
rojects are pla
m Havana Stre
ment a seven
Road to the H
ly 45 more mi
arallel to US 85
ase one consis
on of the trail
ntinue to work
may include ex
onnector syste
ION MASTER
s and Seelements of th
m that conside
pedestrian trav
ycle and pedes
daries and look
urveys have c
y, and expansi
nty.
e and pedestr
One project c
en Chambers
to the existing
anned for 2020
eet to the Mer
(7) mile paved
Highline Canal
les of trails ar
5/ Santa Fe D
sts of 4.5 mile
by 2040, exte
k with state, re
xtending Light
ems between
R PLAN
28 Sec
erviceshe multimodal
ers pedestrian
vel as part of
strian system
k for opportun
consistently in
on. Table 5 de
rian projects a
currently unde
Road and Ridg
g trail system n
0. Approximat
ridian Trail wil
d multi-use tra
Trail.
e planned by 2
Drive. Planned
s of trail betw
ending the rem
egional, and lo
Rail, Bus Rap
communities,
IV. Recommen
l parts of the t
n, bicycle, and
an active lifes
, Douglas Cou
nities to enhan
ndicated that D
escribes bicyc
are planned fo
er construction
geGate Parkw
near Bluffs Re
tely two (2) mi
l be construct
ail loop will be
2040. One ma
to be constru
ween Castle Ro
maining ten (10
ocal jurisdictio
id Transit (BR
, as well as loc
nded Transpo
transportation
transit, is an
style and as a
unty will coord
nce the existin
Douglas Count
cle and pedest
r 2019, which
n will complet
way; and the u
egional Park.
iles of cycle tr
ted. As part of
e constructed
ajor project tha
ucted in phase
ock Parkway a
0) miles from
ons to expand
RT), Bustang In
cal circulating
rtation System
n master plan.
important
healthy comm
dinate with sta
ng system and
ty citizens are
trian facility
will construct
e a four (4) m
npaved eight
rack east alon
f the buildout
with a connec
at is planned i
es, this trail wi
and Sedalia by
Sedalia to C-4
the transit sy
nterregional
g routes.
m Plan
mute
ate
d
e
t
ile
foot
g
of the
ction
is a
ill
y year
470.
stem.
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
EmergThe Count
quality. Th
Data from
areas nee
Douglas C
vehicles. T
signal con
operations
Plan, whic
years, so t
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
ging Tecty is committe
he County plan
these count s
ding attention
County plans to
The County wi
trol and enha
s. Douglas Cou
ch recommend
that the syste
ANSPORTATIO
chnologed to leveragin
ns to install ad
stations allow
n. New road w
o roll out a sys
ll also be impl
nced signal pe
unty recently c
ds scalable tec
m can prepare
ION MASTER
gies ng existing and
dditional autom
County traffic
eather inform
stem on certa
lementing adv
erformance m
completed an
chnologies an
e for future te
R PLAN
29 Sec
d emerging te
mated traffic c
c engineers to
ation stations
in corridors to
vanced feature
easure featur
Intelligent Mo
d applications
echnologies su
IV. Recommen
chnologies to
count stations
o see changes
s are also plan
o begin provid
es to the signa
res, at some lo
obility Demons
s to be implem
uch as connec
nded Transpo
improve trans
s on key trans
s in travel patt
nned.
ing signal info
al system, suc
ocations to im
stration Corrid
mented over th
cted and auton
rtation System
sportation and
portation corr
terns and iden
ormation to
ch as adaptive
prove traffic s
dor Deploymen
he next severa
nomous vehic
m Plan
d air
ridors.
ntify
e
signal
nt
al
les.
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
ANSPORTATIOION MASTER
This page
R PLAN
30 Sec
e intentionally
IV. Recommen
blank
nded Transportation System
m Plan
DOUGLAS COUNTY 2040 TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN
September 2019 31 Sec IV. Recommended Transportation System Plan
FFigure 99:: 22040 RRoadway Network
DOUGLAS CO
September 20
COUNTY 2040
019
0 TRANSPORRTATION MASASTER PLAN
32
Sec IVV. Recommen
Figure 10: PP
ded Transport
lanned Bicyedestrian Fa
tation System
cle and acilities
Plan
DOUGLAS CO
September 20
Proj
ect I
D
Num
ber
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4 5
6
7 8 9 10
COUNTY 2040
019
C
Colorado F
High Lin
Mon
Castle R
0 TRANSPOR
Pr
Castle Oaks DrChaCha
Front Range TEast
ne Canal Trail-Invern
MRidgeSterlinTaylo
Wa
HavM
InvernPlum Creek T
5Cha
DanieFoundCast
arch Boulevar
Ai
Rock and Castl
RTATION MAS
roject Area
rive/Hidden Mmbers Road mbers Road
Trail-Columbint/West Trail Eagle River Stness Parkway
Mainstreet Gate Parkwayng Ranch Traior River Circle terton Road C-470 C-470 C-470
US 85 vana Street
Mainstreet US 85 US 85 US 85
ness Parkwayrail/Front Ran
5th Street mbers Road els Park Road ders Parkway le Oaks Drive
rd to Crowfoot
US 85 rport Road
US 85 lewood State
ASTER PLAN
Mesa Trail
e Trail Connec
treet connectiy
y l
y nge Trail
t Valley Road
Park connecti
Prop
Bicy Bicy Cons
ction Cons Com
ion Cons Bicy Cons Cons Cons Bicy Cons Build Cons Cons
Prop
ConsBicycConsConsConsConsBicycCons
Prop
BicycCompConsCompExtenExtenthe CConsConsCons
ion Cons
posed Bicycle
ycle improvemycle and pedesstruct trail parstruct trail fro
mplete the Easstruct trail con
ycle and Pedesstruct trail alostruct cycle trstruct trail wit
ycle improvemstruct trail witd two (2) pedestruct new C-struct new C-
posed Bicycle
struct trail parcle improvemestruct trail alonstruct underpastruct underpastruct trail aloncle and Pedesstruct trail eas
posed Bicycle
cle improvemeplete trail imp
struct trail parplete trail alonnd Hidden Mend the existingCity of Castle Pstruct trail parstruct trail construct trail or wstruct trail con
Table 5: B
e and Pedest
ments betweenstrian improverallel to Chamm Noe Road, t/West Trail bnnecting the Hstrian improveong the north srack on RidgeGthin Sterling R
ments on Tayloth the extensiestrian and bic470 Trail unde470 Trail unde
e and Pedest
allel to US 85 ents on Havanng the north sass for the C-4ass for the Higng US 85 betwtrian improve
st of I-25 and p
e and Pedest
ents along 5throvements aloallel to Danielng Founders Psa Trail along g trail near CrPines and acroallel to US 85
nnection betwwide shoulder nnecting the T
Bicycle and P
trian Improve
n Founders Paements betwebers Road betsouth of the I-between ChamHigh Line Canaements betweside of MainstGate Parkway
Ranch with a cr River Circle on of Watertocycle bridges terpass at Queerpass at Colo
rian Improvem
between Casna Street betwside of Mainstr470 Trail undegh Line Canal Tween C-470 anments betweeparallel with th
rian Improvem
h Street betweong Chamberss Park Road b
Parkway betwePleasant Viewowfoot Valleyoss I-25, termbetween Higheen the Plum along US 85 b
Town of Castle
33
Pedestrian F
ments / Upg
rkway and Auen E-470 and tween Lincoln-25 and Greenmbers Road anal Trail to the en County Lin
treet betweenbetween Hav
connection alowith the roadw
on Road providthat will carry bec Street an
orado Bouleva
ments / Upgr
tle Rock Parkwween RidgeGatreet between r US 85. Trail under USnd Highlands en the Liberty he railroad bet
ments / Upgr
een the east Ps Road betweeetween US 85een Crowfoot w Drive and CaRoad north toinating near Chlands Ranch Creek Trail nebetween Seda
e Rock and Cas
Facilities Des
rades for Pla
tumn Sage StLincoln Avenu Avenue and M
nland Road intnd RidgeGate intersection oe Road and thMeridian Villa
vana Street anng Roxborougway extensionding connectiv
the C-470 Trad at both wesrd.
rades for Plan
way near the Mte Parkway anChambers Roa
S 85 south of NRanch ParkwaBoulevard/Jatween Plum C
rades for Plan
Plum Creek Traen Mainstreet 5 and Castle PValley Road aastle Oaks Drio Monarch BouCoyote Ridge PParkway and
ear US 85 alonalia (SH 67) anstlewood Stat
scription Tab
Projec
nning Horizo
treet. ue. Mainstreet. erchange, to cParkway. Thisf Titan Road/
he Liberty Bouage Parkway and the Meridiagh Park Road tn. vity to the Sterail over Yosemtbound on-ram
nning Horizon
Meadows neignd Lincoln Avead and Jordan
Norwood Driveay . amaica Street
Creek Parkway
nning Horizon
ail and the inteand Crowfoot
Pines Parkwayand Crimson Sve. ulevard. The tPark. Sedalia (SH 6
ng Waterton Rnd Meadows Pte Park.
ble
ct Description
n: 2019 throu
connect to thes trail will conEagle River Stlevard/Jamai
and Chambersn Trail. to the High Lin
rling Ranch Trmite Street andmps.
n: 2021 throu
ghborhood andenue. n Road.
e.
intersection ay and the Colu
n: 2031 throu
ersection of 5tt Valley Road y. ky Drive.
trail will conne
7). Road/Airport RParkway.
ugh 2020
e Columbine Tnect to the extreet. ica Street inte
s Road.
ne Canal Trail.
rail. d over the C-4
gh 2030
d the Town of
and Lincoln Avmbine Open S
gh 2040
th Street/SH providing con
ect Gemstone
Road to the St
Trail near Skyvxisting trail sy
ersection.
.
470 westboun
f Sedalia.
venue. Space and Tra
86/Foundersnnectivity to th
e Park near the
terling Ranch T
Sec IV
view Lane. ystem near Blu
nd on-ramp.
ail (Faraway Pl
s Parkway/Ridhe Cherry Cree
e Sapphire Po
Trail.
V. Recommen
uffs Regional P
lace).
dge Road. ek Regional Tr
int neighborho
ded Transport
Park.
rail.
ood and exten
tation System
nd through
Plan
DOUGLAS CO
September 20
COUNTY 2040
019
0 TRANSPORRTATION MASASTER PLAN
This
34
page intentionnally blank
Sec IVV. Recommended Transporttation System
Plan
September 2019 35 Sec V. Transportation Plan Implemen
SECTION V. TRANSPORTATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
In order for the TMP to be effective, it must not be static. Douglas County has strived to implement long range
transportation plans and continuous roadway improvement needs. The TMP implementation plan ties directly
to the goals and objectives to ensure that the short-term and mid-term actions are helping to achieve the
long-term vision of the TMP.
Implementation of the plan will require on-going maintenance of the existing transportation system as well as
implementation of new improvements and services described in the TMP. Implementing the TMP is a long
term commitment of the County and requires a collaborative effort partnering with local agencies and
jurisdictions in order to provide a complete and reliable transportation network throughout the County.
The implementation section of the TMP includes the CIP, Funding Strategies, and a list of prioritized
transportation improvements. The recommendations in this section will help the County set its course to
achieve the vision, principles, and policies of the TMP.
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The most recent Douglas County CIP lists necessary transportation system improvements including roadway,
bicycle, pedestrian, transit, and signal system facilities to move toward achieving the transportation vision.
Funding Strategies From the 2019 Douglas County Adopted Budget the current sources of funding identified for roadway and
multimodal transportation improvements within Douglas County include:
Road & Bridge Fund As required by state law this fund is used to account for the costs associated
with the construction and maintenance of County roads and bridges. Restricted revenue sources
include property taxes and highway user fees. The County must share back with incorporated
municipalities one-half of the taxes collected on properties within the incorporated areas.
Infrastructure Fund This fund currently uses a portion of the property taxes (collected by the
General Fund) to augment funding for infrastructure within the County.
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
R
de
N
su
ro
sh
an
w
O
re
ex
de
in
a
P
an
N
an
C
re
op
Lo
fo
th
w
en
us
ta
di
Other impo
D
sh
de
ag
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
oad Sales &
erived from th
ovember 1995
unset Decemb
oads and bridg
hare back of t
nd extending t
where it is colle
pen Space S
evenues derive
xtended by vo
evelopment, a
ncorporated m
share back of
arks Sales &
nd use tax for
ovember 1994
nd maintenan
onservation T
eceived from t
pen space, an
ocal Improve
or road improv
hese improvem
within the LIDs
ngineering and
sed to accoun
axing district,
istrict.
ortant funding
eveloper Agr
haring for nee
evelopment. T
greements. De
ANSPORTATIO
Use Tax Fund
he 0.4% sales a
5 and in Novem
ber 31, 2030. M
ges. The five w
hese revenue
through 2030
ected.
ales & Use Ta
ed from the 0
oters in Novem
and maintenan
municipalities lo
f the revenues
Use Tax Fun
revenues der
4 and extende
ce of public tr
Trust Fund
the state lotte
d other recrea
ment District
vements and u
ments are prov
, with some as
d construction
nt for the reve
and designate
g tools and pot
eements D
ded transport
These cost sha
eveloper agree
ION MASTER
d As require
and use tax, w
mber 2007, vo
Monies are de
wholly incorpo
s in accordan
, the County s
ax Fund As
.17% sales and
mber 2000. Mo
nce of open sp
ocated within
s in accordanc
d As require
rived from the
ed by voters in
rail systems, p
As required b
ry fund to be
ational purpos
ts/General Im
utilities located
vided from sp
ssistance from
n managemen
nues derived f
ed for the imp
tential source
ouglas County
tation improve
aring arrangem
ements reach
R PLAN
36
d by state law
which was orig
oters approved
signated for t
rated municip
ce with exten
shares back 75
required by s
d use tax appr
onies are desig
pace lands, tra
the county at
ce with approv
ed by state law
0.17% open s
n November 20
parks recreatio
y state law th
used for the d
ses within the
mprovement D
d within local
ecial assessm
m general gov
nt costs. Gene
from a design
rovement and
es that can be
y has policies
ements based
ments are typ
ed through ne
Sec V. Tra
w this fund is u
ginally approv
d a 20 year ex
he improveme
palities located
ded intergove
5% of the reve
tate law this f
roved by voter
gnated for the
ail systems, an
t the time the
ved intergove
w this fund is
pace sales an
000. Monies a
onal facilities.
his fund is use
development a
county.
Districts Th
improvement
ments levied ag
vernmental rev
ral Improveme
nated property
d maintenance
used to build
and practices
on increase in
ically impleme
egotiations ca
ansportation P
used to accou
ved by Douglas
xtension of thi
ent and maint
d within the c
ernmental agre
enue with the
fund is used t
rs in Novembe
e acquisition,
nd parks facili
sales tax was
rnmental agre
used to accou
nd use tax app
are designated
ed to account f
and maintenan
hese funds are
districts (LIDs
gainst the pro
venues of the
ent Districts (G
y tax levied by
e of roads loca
projects inclu
s in place that
n traffic cause
ented through
n be used for
Plan Implemen
unt for revenue
s County vote
is tax, which w
enance of cou
ounty receive
eements. Cur
incorporated
o account for
er 1994 and
preservation,
ities. The thre
s approved rec
eements.
unt 0.20% of s
proved by vote
d for developm
for revenues
nce of parks, t
e used to acco
s). Funding fo
operties locate
County for
GIDs) are fund
y GIDs, a speci
ated within tha
ude:
allow for cost
ed by future
h developer
other
ntation
es
rs in
will
unty
a
rrently
area
e
ceive
sales
ers in
ment,
trails,
ount
r
ed
ds
al
at
t
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
tr
to
R
Tr
to
ha
cu
RT
m
en
D
Fu
P
B
In
di
R
to
tr
pa
Th
di
us
in
The ultima
of method
fix existing
County’s f
RoadwFigures 11
the TMP.
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
ransportation
o a specific de
egional Trans
ransportation
o provide trans
as the power t
urrently at lea
TA can levy a
motor vehicle r
nter into agree
RCOG Transp
unds.
artnering wit
UILD and INF
nvestments to
iscretionary g
ecovery (TIGE
o rural areas, i
ransportation a
articular area
he USDOT Infr
iscretionary g
sing innovativ
nfrastructure p
ate funding pro
ds is used, it m
g deficiencies
future growth.
way Imp1 through 13 d
ANSPORTATIO
projects, espe
evelopment.
sportation Au
Authorities (R
sportation ser
to build, finan
st six RTAs op
sales tax of u
egistration fee
ements to rec
portation Imp
h other gove
FRA Grants
Leverage Dev
rant program
ER) grant prog
n contrast wit
and transit pro
competitive fo
rastructure fo
rant program
ve approaches
projects.
ogram may in
must also prov
, as well as pr
provemedisplays the lo
ION MASTER
ecially when th
uthority Colo
RTAs) to fund a
rvices within a
ce, operate, a
perating in Co
up to 1.0 perce
e of up to $10
ceive other rev
rovement Pro
rnmental age
The United St
velopment (BU
following the
rams. The BU
th the previou
ojects. The ru
or BUILD gran
r Building Ame
that targets h
s and partners
clude more th
ide the level o
rovide for tran
ents cations of roa
R PLAN
37
he impact on a
orado law allo
and build tran
a multijurisdict
nd maintain a
lorado, most o
ent; property t
; and levy lodg
venues from p
ogram (TIP) r
encies, includ
tates Departm
UILD) grant pr
previous Tran
ILD program is
s TIGER progr
ral nature of t
nts in the futur
erica (INFRA)
highways, brid
hips with the
han one metho
of revenue nec
sportation imp
adway projects
Sec V. Tra
a transportatio
ows cities and
sportation inf
tional area bo
any regional tr
of which provi
ax of up to 5 m
ging taxes of u
participating ju
egional and su
ing districts, c
ment of Transp
rogram is a fed
nsportation Inv
s targeting at
ram which gen
the southern D
re.
grant program
ges and other
private secto
od. Whatever f
cessary to pro
provements n
s, by planning
ansportation P
on facility is c
counties to fo
rastructure im
undary (CRS 4
ansportation s
ide funding fo
mills; charge t
up to 2.0 perc
urisdictions.
ubregional allo
cities, towns a
portation (USD
deral transpor
vestment Gen
least 30 perc
nerally favored
Douglas Count
m is a federal t
r transportatio
r to fund trans
funding metho
ovide adequate
needed to supp
horizon, need
Plan Implemen
clearly attribut
orm Regional
mprovements a
43-4-601). An
system. There
r transit servic
tolls; charge a
cent. RTAs ma
ocations of Fe
and CDOT.
DOT) Better Ut
rtation
erating Econo
ent of its fund
d large urban
ty may make t
transportation
on infrastructu
sportation
od or combina
e maintenanc
port Douglas
ded to implem
ntation
table
and
RTA
e are
ce. An
y also
ederal
tilizing
omic
ding
that
n
ure
ation
e and
ment
DOUUGLAS COUNT
Septembe
Project P
Table 6 lis
project loc
agencies a
constructi
In order to
methodolo
existing tr
provide ne
then priori
An importa
continually
adjust prio
NTY 2040 TRA
er 2019
Prioritization
sts proposed r
cation, planne
and partners a
on costs, with
o prioritize this
ogy was devel
affic condition
eeded linkages
itized by categ
ant aspect of
y monitor dev
orities as more
ANSPORTATIO
n
roadway impro
d improvemen
anticipated to
hout right‐of‐w
s needs list in
loped for each
ns, the networ
s to the rest o
gory based on
this list is the
elopment patt
e information
ION MASTER
ovement proje
nt, and respon
contribute to
way acquisitio
to short-term
h category tha
rk performanc
f the transpor
the ranking c
necessary fle
terns to ensur
is known.
R PLAN
38
ects identified
nsibility. The p
each project.
on, for the enti
, mid-term an
at used traditio
ce evaluations
rtation system
criteria.
exibility and flu
re the continu
Sec V. Tra
by this TMP.
roject respons
The cost esti
ire project in 2
d long-term im
onal transport
s, and the abili
m. The recomm
uidity of the a
ed operation o
ansportation P
Key columns
sibility qualita
mates represe
2018 dollars.
mprovements,
tation data suc
ity of the impr
mended roadw
nalysis. The C
of all roadway
Plan Implemen
include plann
tively assesse
ent high‐level
, a ranking
ch as traffic d
rovement proje
way projects w
County will
y facilities and
ntation
ed
es the
data,
ect to
were
to
DO
Sep
OUGLAS COU
ptember 2019
UNTY 2040 TRRANSPORTATATION MASTEER PLAN
39
Fig
Sec V
gure 11: Sho
Ro
V. Transportat
ort-Term 20
adway Impr
tion Plan Imple
19-2020
ovements
ementation
DO
Sep
OUGLAS COU
ptember 2019
UNTY 2040 TRRANSPORTATATION MASTEER PLAN
40
Fig
Sec V
ure 12: Mid
Roa
V. Transportat
-Term 2021-
dway Impro
tion Plan Imple
-2030
vements
ementation
DO
Sep
OUGLAS COU
ptember 2019
UNTY 2040 TRRANSPORTATATION MASTEER PLAN
41
Fi
Sec V
gure 13: Lo
Ro
V. Transportat
ng-Term 20
adway Impr
tion Plan Imple
31-2040
ovements
ementation
DO
Sep
Proj
ect I
D N
umbe
r
6 7 12 13 15 28 43 55 56 70 71
OUGLAS COU
ptember 2019
CottonwoodRidgeGate PWaterton RWaterton RPine Lane Chambers RDaniels ParkUS 85 US 85 I-25 Gap WiC-470 Wide
UNTY 2040 TR
Roadway
d Drive Pkwy oad oad / Souther
Road k Road
idening & Recening & Recon
RANSPORTAT
y
rn Connector
onstruction struction
ATION MASTE
2040 RClassif
Minor AMajor AMinor AMinor AMinor AMajor A
ColleMajor AExpreInterInter
ER PLAN
oadway fication
Arterial ChaArterial I-25Arterial RamArterial MoArterial DixArterial Linector GriArterial 1,20ssway Aspstate Casstate Wa
ambers Road 5 to Lone Treempart Range R
oore Road to Axon Drive to Picoln Ave to Mgs Road to Ca00-feet north pen Leaf (nortstle Rock (Pluadsworth (SH
Table
Proposed
to Cottonwooe Eastern CityRoad to Moore
Airport Road / ine Drive
Mainstreet / Riastle Pines Pkw
of County Linth of Louviers)m Creek Pkwy121) to Interst
e 6: Douglas
Location
d Roadway Im
od Way y Limits e Road US 85
idgeGate Pkwwy
ne Road to Hig) to Mile Post y) to Monumetate 25
County Tra
mprovements
wy
ghlands Ranch191 (south of Snt
42
nsportation
/ Upgrades
Pkwy Sedalia)
Improvemen
for Planning
Widen from Widen from New 4 lane MNew 2 lane MSafety ImproWiden from Upgrade fromWiden from Widen from Capacity & OCapacity & O
nts Summar
Improveme
Horizon: 2019
2 to 4 lanes 2 to 6 lanes Minor Arterial Minor Arterial ovements 2 to 4 lanes m unpaved to 4 to 6 lanes 2 to 4 lanes
Operational ImOperational Im
S
ry - Roads
ent / Upgrade
9 through 20
(for initial 2 la
2 lane Collect
mprovements mprovements
Subtotal 2019
20
anes)
tor
9-2020 Horizon
$ M
illio
ns
12.0 27.0 20.0 15.0 1.9 5.5 4.1
94.0 37.5
350.0 390.0
n: $957.0
Planning L
% from Douglas County
0% 9% 0%
100% 100% 100% 100% 60% 20% 2.9% 4.5%
Sec V
Level Cost Est
Potential P
Amount froDouglas County
2.5 -
15.0 1.9 5.5 4.1
56.0 7.5
10.0 17.5
$120.0
V. Transportat
timate (Using
Project Financi
m % froOthe
AgencieDevelop
100%91%
100%0%0%0%0%
40%80%97%96%
tion Plan Imple
2018 Costs)
al Partners
m er es or pers
AmoOtheror De
% % %
% % % 3% 3
$
ementation
ount from r Agencies evelopers
12.0 24.5 20.0
- - - -
38.0 30.0
340.0 372.5
837.0
DO
Sep
Proj
ect I
D N
umbe
r
2 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 7 12 73 74 14 17 17 17 19 20 21 23 25 30 34 33 32 32 32 46 47 48 48 49 50
OUGLAS COU
ptember 2019
County LineLincoln Ave Lincoln AveLincoln AveLincoln AveLincoln AveLincoln AveBelford AveRidgeGate PWaterton RMoore RoadWaterton RHess Road Hilltop RoadHilltop RoadHilltop RoadStroh Road Stroh Road Stroh Road Scott Road Peoria StreeDransfeldt RChambers RChambers RBayou GulchBayou GulchBayou Gulch I-25 / Happ Crowfoot V Crowfoot V Crowfoot V Crowfoot V Crowfoot V
UNTY 2040 TR
Roadway
e Road / I-25 Interchnue nue nue nue nue nue
Pkwy oad
d oad
d d d
et Road ExtensioRoad Road h Road h Road h Road py Canyon Inte
Valley Rd Valley Rd Valley Rd Valley Rd Valley Rd
RANSPORTAT
y
hange Comple
on
erchange (Init
ATION MASTE
2040 RClassif
Major Aex Major A
Major AMajor AMajor AMajor AMajor A
ColleMajor AMinor AMinor AMinor AMajor AMajor AMajor AMajor AMinor AMinor AMinor A
ColleMajor AMinor AMajor AMajor AMajor AMajor AMajor A
tial) IntercMajor AMajor AMajor AMajor AMajor A
ER PLAN
oadway fication
Arterial BroArterial ParArterial OswArterial PeoArterial ChaArterial KeyArterial Jorector PeoArterial LonArterial RamArterial WaArterial WaArterial CanArterial CanArterial MeArterial SinArterial ChArterial CrArterial SHector BaArterial BeArterial 20Arterial HeArterial StArterial CrArterial NoArterial Schange I-2Arterial FoArterial CaArterial MaArterial PraArterial Ba
oadway to Unirk Meadows Dwego St to Peoria St to Chaambers Road ystone Blvd tordan Road to Poria St to Chane Tree Eastempart Range Raterton Road tadsworth (SH nyonside Blvdnterberry Pkw
erryvale Trail tnging Hills Roahambers Roadowfoot Valley
H 83 to Hilltopayou Gulch Roelford Ave to L0 Mile Road to ess Road to Stroh Road to Cowfoot Valley
orth Pinery Pacott Road to P25/Happy Canounders Pkwy anyonside Blvdacanta (north adera Pkwy to
ayou Gulch Ro
Proposed
iversity Blvd Drive to Oswegeoria St mbers Road to Keystone B
o Jordan RoadParker Road mbers Road rn City Limits Road to Mooreto Titan Road 121) to Campf
d to Chamberswy to Merryval
o Singing Hillsad to Flintwoo
d to Crowfoot Vy Rd to SH 83 Road ad to SH 83
Lincoln Ave Motensbocke
troh Road Crowfoot Valleyy Road to Nortrkway to Scotradera Parkwa
nyon Rd (initiato Canyonsided to Macanta access into C
o Bayou Gulchad / Chambe
Location
d Roadway Im
go Street
Blvd d
to Chambers e Road
fire to Rampars Rd e Trail s Rd od Road Valley Rd
er Road
y Road h Pinery Parkwtt Road ay l west side coe Blvd (north access
Canyons Southh Road / Chamrs Road to Str
mprovements
Road
rt Range Road
way
onnect to Laga
s into Canyonsh) to Pradera Pmbers Road roh Road
43
/ Upgrades f
ae Rd)
s South) Pkwy
for Planning H
Widen from Operational Operational Widen from Widen from Widen from Widen from New 4 lane CWiden from Widen from Widen from Widen from Widen from Widen from Widen from Widen from New 4 lane MWiden from New 2 lane MNew 2 lane CWiden from New 4 lane MNew 4 lane MNew 4 lane MNew 4 lane MNew 4 lane M New 4 lane Improve inte
Widen from Widen from Widen from Widen from Widen from
Improveme
Horizon: 2021
2 to 4 lanes ImprovementsImprovements4 to 6 lanes 4 to 6 lanes 4 to 6 lanes 4 to 6 lanes Collector 4 to 6 lanes 2 to 4 lanes 2 to 4 lanes 2 to 4 lanes 2 to 4 lanes 2 to 4 lanes 2 to 4 lanes 2 to 4 lanes Minor Arterial2 to 4 lanes Minor ArterialCollector 2 to 4 lanes Minor Arterial Major ArterialMajor ArterialMajor ArterialMajor ArterialMajor Arterial
erchange - con
2 to 4 lanes, 2 to 4 lanes, 2 to 4 lanes, 2 to 4 lanes, 2 to 4 lanes,
ent / Upgrade
1 through 20
s s
(for initial 2 la
l (for initial 2 lanect only west
Minor to MajoMinor to MajoMinor to MajoMinor to MajoMinor to Majo
030
anes)
anes) t side to Ligget
r Arterial r Arterial r Arterial r Arterial r Arterial
$ M
illio
ns
20.0 80.0 4.0 10.0 8.0 8.0 16.0 8.0 12.0 12.0 8.0 16.0 17.0 13.5 12.0 5.0 11.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 22.0 12.0 14.0 6.0 4.0 4.0
ett 8.5 10.0 12.0 20.0 6.0
20.0
Planning L
% from Douglas County
25% 25% 75% 90% 100% 25% 25% 0%
100% 0% 25% 25% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 0%
85% 0% 33% 36% 0% 0% 0% 25% 100% 59% 20% 33% 100% 50% 0%
Sec V
Level Cost Est
Potential P
Amount froDouglas County
5.0 20.0 3.0 9.0 8.0 2.0 4.0
- 12.0
- 2.0 4.0 17.0 13.5 12.0 5.0
8.5
2.0 8.0
1.0 4.0 5.0 2.0 4.0 20.0 3.0
-
V. Transportat
timate (Using
Project Financi
m % froOthe
AgencieDevelop
75%75%25%10%0%75%75%
100%0%
100%75%75%0%0%0%0%
100%100%15%
100%67%64%100%100%100%75%0%41%80%67%0%
50%100%
tion Plan Imple
2018 Costs)
al Partners
m er es or pers
AmoOtheror De
% % % %
% % %
% % %
% %
% %
% % % % %
%
% % %
% %
ementation
ount from r Agencies evelopers
15.0 60.0 1.0 1.0
- 6.0 12.0 8.0 -
12.0 6.0 12.0
- - -
11.0 12.0 1.5 8.0 4.0 14.0 12.0 14.0 6.0 3.0
3.5 8.0 8.0 -
3.0 20.0
DO
Sep
Proj
ect I
D N
umbe
r
35 36 37 38 42 44 51 53 54 58 62 65 66 67 68 69 72
OUGLAS COU
ptember 2019
Pine Drive Pine Drive Pine Drive Pine Drive Daniels ParkCanyonside Founders P West I-25 F US 85 US 85 SH 83 SH 86 Fifth Street West I-25 F Crystal Vall Wolfensber E-470 Publ
UNTY 2040 TR
Roadway
k Road Boulevard
Parkway / SH Frontage Road
t Frontage Roadley / I-25 Interger Road ic Highway Au
RANSPORTAT
y
86 d
d** rchange**
uthority
ATION MASTE
2040 RClassif
Minor AMinor AMinor AMinor A
ColleMajor AMajor AMajor AExpreExpre
Major AMajor AMinor AMinor AInterc
Major AToll
ER PLAN
oadway fication
Arterial LinArterial PonArterial PinArterial Insector ShaArterial HesArterial CrArterial Plussway Higssway SHArterial SHArterial FoArterial WoArterial Cryhange ReArterial Coway I-2
Co
coln Avenue tnderosa Drive
ne Lane to Inspspiration Driveadowbrook/Vss Road to Croowfoot Valleyum Creek Pkwghlands RanchH 67 (Sedalia) H 86 to Douglaounders Pkwy oodlands Blvdystal Valley Pa
equires relocatoachline Road 25 to Parker R
ontinued - Pro
to Ponderosa e to Pine Lane piration Drive to Aurora Par
Valleybrook Cirowfoot Valley
y Road to Fifthwy to Crystal Vh Parkway to Tto Meadows P
as / El Paso C/ Ridge Road
d to Ridge Roaarkway / Terrting W. I-25 Fto Prairie Hawoad
Location
oposed Roadw
Drive
rkway rcle to Grigs Ry Road
Street / RidgValley ParkwayTitan Road Parkway
County Line (Pa to Enderud R
ad / Founders ritorial Road torontage Rd** wk Road
way Improvem
Road
ge Road y
almer Divide RRoad
Parkway o Tomah Road(Crystal Valley
44
ments / Upgr
Road)
d y to Tomah)
rades for Plan
Widen from Widen from Widen from New 4 lane MUpgrade fromNew 4 lane M Widen from New 4 lane Widen from Widen 2 to 4 Safety Impr Widen from Widen from New Arteria New Interch Widen from Widen from
Improveme
nning Horizon
2 to 4 lanes 2 to 4 lanes 2 to 4 lanes Minor Arterialm unpaved to Major Arterial 4 to 6 lanesMajor Arterial 4 to 6 lanes4 lanes, Majorovements 2 to 4 lanes 2 to 4 lanes
al (required forhange (require 2 to 4 lanes 6 to 8 lanes
S
ent / Upgrade
n: 2021 throu
2 lane Collect(for initial 2 la
l
r Arterial to Ex
r new interchaes relocated fr
Subtotal 2021
gh 2030
tor anes)
xpressway
ange) rontage road)
1-2030 Horizon
$ M
illio
ns
3.0 3.0 6.0 10.0 7.0 16.0 28.0 24.0 5.0
60.0 16.0 10.0 12.0 12.0 60.0 8.0 45.0
n: $760.0
Planning L
% from Douglas County
100% 100% 100% 20% 100% 0% 0%
12.5% 0% 15% 25% 50%
33.3% 50% 10% 38% 0%
Sec V
Level Cost Est
Potential P
Amount froDouglas County
3.0 3.0 6.0 2.0 7.0 - -
3.0 -
9.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 3.0
-
$235.0
V. Transportat
timate (Using
Project Financi
m % froOthe
AgencieDevelop
0%0%0%
80%0%
100%100%88%100%85%75%50%67%50%90%63%100%
tion Plan Imple
2018 Costs)
al Partners
m er es or pers
AmoOtheror De
%
% % % % % % % % % % % %
$
ementation
ount from r Agencies evelopers
- - -
8.0 -
16.0 28.0 21.0 5.0 51.0 12.0 5.0 8.0 6.0 54.0 5.0 45.0
$ 525.0
DO
Sep
Proj
ect I
D N
umbe
r
1 3 8 9 10 11 16 18 22 24 26 27 28 29 34 33 32 31
39
40 44
46
45
52
57
59
60 61 62
63
64 75
OUGLAS COU
ptember 2019
County Line Lincoln Aven Mainstreet / Titan Road Titan Road Rampart Ran Pine Lane Singing Hills North Pinery Interlocken S Peoria Street Chambers Ro Chambers Ro Chambers Ro Chambers Ro Chambers Ro Bayou Gulch Bayou Gulch
Delbert Road
Monarch BlvCanyonside B
I-25/Happy C
Happy Canyo
Ridge Road
US 85
SH 83
SH 83 SH 83 SH 83
SH 86
SH 86 Aurora Parkw
UNTY 2040 TR
Roadway
Road ue
/ East Parker R
nge Road
Road Parkway
Street t oad oad oad oad oad Road Road
d
d Blvd
Canyon Interc
on Road (East
way Extension
RANSPORTAT
Road
hange (Ultima
of I-25)
n
ATION MASTE
2040 RClassi
Major Major Minor Minor Major Minor Minor Major
CollColl
Major Major Major Major Major Major Major Major
Major
Minor Major
ate) Interc
Coll
Coll
Expre
Expre
Major Major Major
Major
Major Major
ER PLAN
Roadway fication
Arterial USArterial QuArterial CaArterial RaArterial MArterial WArterial SHArterial Hiector Baector ScArterial LinArterial E-Arterial LinArterial MArterial HeArterial StArterial ScArterial Pr
Arterial Si
Arterial MArterial He
change I-2
ector I-2
ector Ca
essway Pr
essway So
Arterial BaArterial CaArterial SH
Arterial En
Arterial SHArterial SH
S 85 to Broaduebec Street tanterberry Pkwampart Rangeoore Road to
Waterton Road H 83 to Dixon illtop Road to ayou Gulch Rocott Road to Oncoln Avenue -470 to Lincolnncoln Avenue ainstreet / Riess Road to Stroh Road to Ccott Road to Pradera Parkwa
nging Hills Ro
cArthur Ranchess Rd to Crow
25 / Happy Ca
25 to Canyons
astle Rock bou
rivate Road to
outh Pinery Pk
ayou Gulch Roastle Oaks DriH 86 to Dougla
nderud Road t
H 83 to DelberH 83 to Travio
Proposed
way to Yosemite Swy to Delbert
e Road to MooUS 85 (Includto Titan RoadDrive Delbert Road
oad to SH 83 Old Schoolhou to RidgeGaten Avenue to MainstreetdgeGate Pkwytroh Road
Crowfoot VallePradera Parkway to Old Scho
oad to County
h to Castle Pinwfoot Valley R
anyon Rd (ulti
side Blvd (requ
undary to Lake
o SH 67 / SH 1
kwy to Bayou
oad to Castle Ove to SH 86 as / El Paso C
to SH 83
rt Road os Trail / Irelan
Location
Roadway Im
Street Road re Road ing Interchang
d
se Road Pkwy
t / RidgeGate y to Hess Roa
ey Road way oolhouse Road
Line Road
nes northern CRd
mate w/ SPU
uires ultimate
e Gulch Road
105 (Sedalia)
Gulch Road
Oaks Drive
County Line (P
nd Way
mprovements
ge Improveme
Pkwy ad
d / SH 83
City Limits
I to connect e
interchange)
Palmer Divide
45
/ Upgrades f
ents)
east side)
Road)
for Planning H
Widen from Widen from Widen from Widen from Widen from Widen from Widen from Widen 2 to New 2 lane Upgrade to Widen from Widen from Widen from Widen from Widen from Widen from Widen from Widen from
Widen 2 to
Widen from Widen from
Improve int
New 4 lane
Upgrade fro
Upgrade Ma
Widen from
Widen to 6 Widen from Widen from
Widen from
Widen from New 4 lane
Improveme
Horizon: 203
m 2 to 4 lanesm 4 to 6 lanesm 2 to 4 lanesm 2 to 4 lanesm 2 to 4 lanesm 2 to 4 lanesm 2 to 4 lanes
4 lanes, Colle Collector 2 lane Collect
m 2 to 4 lanesm 4 to 6 lanesm 4 to 6 lanesm 4 to 6 lanesm 4 to 6 lanesm 4 to 6 lanesm 2 to 4 lanesm 2 to 4 lanes
4 lanes, Colle
m 2 to 4 lanesm 2 to 4 lanes
terchange - co
Arterial
om unpaved to
ajor Arterial to
m 4 to 6 lanes
lanes m 2 to 4 lanesm 2 to 4 lanes
m 2 to 4 lanes
m 2 to 4 lanese Arterial
ent / Upgrade
1 through 20
ctor to Major A
tor
ctor to Major A
onnect east si
o 2 lane Collec
o Expressway
e
40
Arterial
Arterial
de
ctor
$ M
illio
ns
24.0 30.0 28.0 16.0 20.0 15.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 4.0
10.0 14.0 8.0 16.0 10.0 10.0 11.0 16.0
48.0
16.0 10.0
20.0
6.0
18.0
20.0
4.0
20.0 20.0
210.0
40.0
40.0 28.0
Planning
% from Douglas County
25% 100% 100% 50% 25% 67% 25% 100% 50% 25% 50% 100% 100% 25% 0% 0%
100% 100%
33%
100% 0%
25%
0%
100%
0%
50%
50% 50% 0%
0%
0% 0%
Sec V
Level Cost Es
Potential P
Amt. fromDouglas County
6.0 30.0 28.0 8.0 5.0 10.0 3.0 12.0 7.0 1.0
5.0 14.0 8.0 4.0
- -
11.0 16.0
16.0
16.0 -
5.0
18.0
-
2.0
10.0 10.0
V. Transportat
timate (Using
Project Financ
m % froOthe
AgencieDevelo
75%0%0%
50%75%33%75%0%
50%75%50%0%0%75%
1001000%0%
67%
0%100
75%
100
0%
100
50%
50%50%100
100
100100
tion Plan Imple
2018 Costs)
ial Partners
om er es or pers
Amt. AgeDe
% % % % % % % % % % %
% % % % %
% %
%
% %
%
%
%
%
%
% % %
%
% %
ementation
from Other encies or velopers
18.0 - -
8.0 15.0 5.0 9.0 -
7.0 3.0 5.0 - -
12.0 10.0 10.0
- -
32.0
- 10.0
15.0
6.0
-
20.0
2.0
10.0 10.0 210.0
40.0
40.0 28.0
DO
Sep
Proj
ect I
D N
umbe
r
75 76
Note: Count
OUGLAS COU
ptember 2019
E-470 / Aur SH 83 / Aur
the potential ty or from any
UNTY 2040 TR
Roadway
ora Parkway Irora Parkway I
contribution py other potenti
RANSPORTAT
nterchange Interchange
percentages aial funding par
ATION MASTE
2040 RClassi
IntercInterc
and amounts srtners (includi
ER PLAN
Roadway fication
change Nechange Ne
shown in this sng developers
ew Interchangew Interchang
spreadsheet /s or other gov
ge E-470 at Auge E-470 at Au
/ table does nernmental age
Location
urora Parkwayurora Parkway
not commit funencies).
y y
nding from Do
46
uglas
New Interc New Interc
* Note: of t
Improveme
change change
he $120 Millio
ent / Upgrade
Subtotal 2031
Subtotal 2019
n shown abov
Subtotal 2021
Subtotal 2031
Total (2
e
1-2040 Horizo
9-2020 Horizo
ve, all but $20
1-2030 Horizo
1-2040 Horizo
2021 thru 204
$ M
illio
ns
20.0 30.0
on: $820.0
on: $957.0
0 Million has a
on: $760.0
on: $820.0
40)
$1,580.0
Planning
% from Douglas County
0% 0%
lready been a
Sec V
Level Cost Es
Potential P
Amount froDouglas County
$245.0
$120.0
ppropriated or
$235.0
$245.0
$ 480.0
V. Transportat
timate (Using
Project Financ
om % froOthe
AgencieDevelo
100100
*
r expended th
0
tion Plan Imple
2018 Costs)
ial Partners
om er es or pers
AmoOtheor D
% %
$
$
ru 2019.
$
$
$
ementation
ount from r Agencies evelopers
20.0 30.0
$ 575.0
$ 837.0
$ 525.0
$ 575.0
1,100.0
September 2019 Appendix A
AAPPENDIX A.
TRANSPORTATION GOALS, OBJECTIVES
AND POLICIES
1
DDOUGLAS COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
The 2040 Douglas County Comprehensive Master Plan Transportation Element was set within the broader
context of the 2040 Douglas County Comprehensive Master Plan with the vision for a transportation network
comprised of diverse types of transportation facilities, supports improved access and mobility; it shapes the
way we travel and the development of our communities. For the following transportation-related goals and
objectives established with the Comprehensive Master Plan, policies and strategies will be developed to guide
the Transportation Plan process and recommendations.
Goal 7-1
Develop an efficient, multifunctional transportation network designed to ensure safety, promote user access,
and facilitate cost-effective operations and maintenance.
OBJECTIVE 7-1A
Ensure consistency between the Transportation Master Plan and local and regional transportation plans.
Policy 7-1A.1
Coordinate planning and development review efforts with municipalities and other agencies to ensure
integration and continuity of the transportation network.
Policy 7-1A.2
Support partnerships at the local and regional level, and between the public and private sector, to
improve the transportation network.
OBJECTIVE 7-1B
Integrate all appropriate modes of travel within the Transportation Master Plan.
Policy 7-1B.1
Provide a comprehensive multi-modal transportation network plan and prioritization framework
within the Transportation Master Plan.
OBJECTIVE 7-1C
Consider safety a major element of transportation improvements in the County.
Douglas County 2040 Transportation Master Plan
2
PPolicy 7-1C.1
Design transportation corridors that are safe for all users and sensitive to the community context.
Policy 7-1C.2
Encourage design solutions to enhance both vehicular and non-vehicular user safety, including but
not limited to pedestrian, bicycle, and wildlife corridor grade-separated crossings, and roundabouts,
where feasible, as an alternative to traffic signals.
Goal 7-2
Develop and maintain an efficient and safe road network in harmony with natural features and existing
neighborhoods.
OBJECTIVE 7-2A
Plan and construct an efficient road network.
Policy 7-2A.1
Through the design process, ensure that collector and arterial road rights-of-way are sufficient to
accommodate all identified street users and functions. These may include vehicles, transit,
pedestrian facilities, on-street bicycle lanes, off-street shared use trails, landscaping and
roundabouts. Traffic calming features should be included to improve safety and increase pedestrian
and bicyclist safety.
Policy 7-2A.2
Promote connectivity and continuity in local, collector, and regional roads between adjacent
neighborhoods and in regional roads between neighborhoods and commercial and employment areas
to minimize unnecessary driving.
Policy 7-2A.3
Prior to road widening as a means to improve capacity, evaluate the costs and benefits of alternative
capacity enhancement strategies.
OBJECTIVE 7-2B
Ensure new development pays its fair share.
Policy 7.2B.1
Ensure development-generated road construction is consistent with the Douglas County Capital
Improvements Plan (CIP).
Douglas County 2040 Transportation Master Plan
3
PPolicy 7-2B.2
Ensure that developers cause construction of, or provide fair-share financial contributions to,
development-required public capital improvements and facilities.
Policy 7-2B.3
Ensure developers contribute to, and mitigate, impacts to off-site transportation infrastructure.
Traffic Impact Studies should account for off-site conditions and impacts.
OBJECTIVE 7-2C
Provide adequate primary, secondary, and emergency connections for subdivisions.
Policy 7-2C.1
Provide connections between residential neighborhoods with collector and local roads, and future
road connections, where appropriate, to support alternative travel routes.
Policy 7-2C.2
Ensure road layouts and connections support desired response requirements for emergency service
and efficient school bus service.
Policy 7-2C.3
Plan major new roads to minimize negative impacts on existing neighborhoods.
Policy 7-2C.4
Evaluate requests for right-of-way vacation in light of current and future transportation needs, which
may include road network modifications multi-use trail corridors, and other public purposes.
OBJECTIVE 7-2D
Design local roads to serve the purpose and scale of the neighborhood.
Policy 7-2D.1
Support local road design that encourage walkable environments and foster sense of place.
Policy 7-2D.2
Design neighborhood streets to calm traffic and discourage traffic volumes in excess of adopted
standards.
Policy 7-2 D.3
Ensure that land area is provided to allow adequate berming for visual relief and noise abatement,
outside of the right-of-way if necessary.
Douglas County 2040 Transportation Master Plan
4
PPolicy 7-2 D.4
Road designs should complement and minimize impact to natural features and landscape.
Policy 7-2 D.5
Design transportation corridor improvements to carefully minimize impacts to, and allow coexistence
with, significant open space, riparian areas, and wildlife movement corridors.
Goal 7-3 Support enhanced public transit in Douglas County.
OBJECTIVE 7-3A
Facilitate an integrated transit plan as a component of the Transportation Master Plan.
Policy 7-3A.1
Coordinate and support existing and future transportation services provided by other agencies to
fulfill service demands of County residents, including older adults and people with disabilities.
OBJECTIVE 7-3B
Incorporate transit facilities within development in urban areas.
Policy 7-3B.1
Support land development patterns and practices that strengthen and create multi-modal
transportation options and transit-oriented development within the Primary Urban Area, and in the
Separated Urban Areas, as appropriate.
Goal 7-4
Coordinate transportation and land use planning design, programs, and policies to reduce traffic congestion,
provide alternatives to automobile use, improve air quality, and create healthy, desirable living environments.
OBJECTIVE 7-4A
Reduce traffic congestion through implementation of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) and
land planning principles.
Policy 7-4A.1
Encourage employers to establish programs that include the use of staggered work hours that
support off-peak travel, four-day work weeks, telecommuting, non-typical work shifts, formal van
pool or company ridesharing programs and/or transit passes.
Douglas County 2040 Transportation Master Plan
5
PPolicy 7-4A.2
Provide incentives to businesses to reduce employee commuting and automobile use, if supported by
adopted TDM policies or programs, as described in the Transportation Master Plan.
OBJECTIVE 7-4B
Use land-use planning to reduce travel by automobile and improve access to community resources.
Policy 7-4B.1
Ensure all new development and redevelopment projects incorporate bicycle and pedestrian facilities
that connect community uses and destinations, including employment centers, residential areas,
shopping, parks, transit facilities, schools and other community activity centers, where possible.
Policy 7-4B.2
Encourage mixed-use development, with appropriate scale and pattern of uses, that supports a
variety of travel options and connects community uses and destinations.
Policy 7-4B.3
Coordinate and provide multi-modal links with the County’s regional trail system.
Policy 7-4B.4
Ensure new and existing developments promote connectivity through road and off-street path design
to reduce trip lengths, provided multiple alternative travel routes between community uses and
destinations and provides alternatives to automobile use.
Goal 7-5
Refine land-use compatibility within the Centennial Airport Review Area Overlay District (CARA) to ensure air
and ground safety.
OBJECTIVE 7-5A
Achieve consistency in land-use planning within the CARA .
Policy 7-5A.1
Apply CARA land use regulations, where applicable, in addition to underlying zoning regulations, to
ensure the future operations of Centennial Airport.
Policy 7-5A.2
Coordinate land use planning with the Arapahoe County Public Airport Authority and apply principles
established in the DRCOG Airport Compatible Land Use Design handbook, where applicable.
Douglas County 2040 Transportation Master Plan
6
OBJECTIVE 7-5B
Coordinate land-use planning activities with other jurisdictions adjacent to the CARA.
PPolicy 7-5B.1
Develop a regional framework, achieved through consensus, regarding future land use planning
surrounding Centennial Airport.
Goal 7-6
Achieve compatibility between the railways, other transportation corridors, and surrounding land uses.
OBJECTIVE 7-6A
Reduce all at-grade crossings involving public roads as well as private roads, where possible.
Policy 7-6A.1
Encourage grade-separated crossings for both new and existing development to enhance public
safety and efficiency.
OBJECTIVE 7-6B
Achieve land-use compatibility between the railways and adjoining land uses.
Policy 7-6B.1
Ensure all new land uses located in the vicinity of rail lines are compatible with railway noise, air
quality, visual, fire, and access impacts.
OBJECTIVE 7-6C
Continue to pursue passenger commuter service.
Policy 7-6C.1
Support commuter rail that connects the County with other areas in the Front Range.
DOUGLAS COUNTY 2040 TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN
September 2019 Appendix B
AAPPENDIX B.
TRAVEL FORECAST MODEL VALIDATION
TTravel Forecast Model Validation
Travel demand for the 2040 Transportation Master Plan (TMP) for Douglas County was performed using the regional DRCOG TransCAD travel demand model (FOCUS 2.1). Sub area analysis was performed for the Douglas County TMP by updating the land use input data provided by the County and agreed by DRCOG to be in line with the regional control totals. The network model inputs including roadway lane geometries and functional classifications were provided by Douglas County, and by the City of Lone Tree and the Towns of Parker and Castle Rock based on their respective transportation plans.
The subarea model base year was 2015. Traffic counts from Douglas County, DRCOG and CDOT were used in the validation process. The following validation measurements were used to quantify the validation using the traffic counts and base year model volumes:
Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT): The VMT comparison for the model was performed at the county level. Total Douglas County vehicle miles of travel from the model are compared to VMT from the traffic counts. This comparison is done for the links with traffic counts. Based on VMT, this model received a high validation. Table B-1 presents the comparison data.
Table B-1: Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) Validation
ALL FACILITIES NON-FREEWAY
VMT on links with counts 2,867,387 1,524,621
Count-VMT 3,060,786 1,628,561
VMT/ Count-VMT 0.94 0.95
Screenline Comparison: The screenline validation is a comparison of model volumes and observed traffic counts along the screenlines. Screenlines are imaginary lines that extend across a series of roadway links that form a logical basis for evaluation of regional travel movements in the model. Screenlines used in the Douglas County transportation model are presented in Figure B-1. Table B-2 presents the comparison data.
Table B-2: Screenline Comparison
SCREELINE DESCRIPTION TRAFFIC
COUNT MODEL
VOLUME PERCENT
DIFFERENCE
A - North County Line (West) 207,730 213,657 -2.9%
B – I-25 173,000 173,420 -0.2%
C - Highlands Ranch South 44,411 46,715 -5.2%
D - West of I-25 120,068 93,205 22.4%
E - East of I-25 91,101 81,521 10.5%
F - Parker Cordon 125,000 110,628 11.5%
G - Castle Rock Cordon 247,229 229,377 7.2%
H - South County Line 80,146 81,356 -1.5%
Overall, the screenline comparison indicates that the model is well calibrated. Most of the screenlines were less than 10% different or better between traffic counts and model volumes.
FFigure B-1: Traffic Model Screenlines
The R-Squared value comparison of traffic counts and model volumes was 0.98. Based on model validation standards, an R-squared value greater than 0.85 is considered well calibrated.
Table B-3 presents the screenline data of 2015 traffic counts and model volumes for reference:
TTable B-3: Screenline Comparison Data- 2015 Counts and Model Volumes - Model Validation Screenline ADT Volumes
DOUGLAS COUNTY 2040 TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN
September 2019 Appendix C
AAPPENDIX C.
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONES
TABLE -1: TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS AND EMPLOYMENT ASSUMED FOR 2020, 2030, AND 2040
2020 2030 2040
TAZ Households Employment Households Employment Households Employment
2349 400 200 1,700 900 2,780 1,865
2350 970 50 2,000 850 3,453 2,000
2351 175 20 3,000 800 7,000 2,000
2352 2 300 2 400 2 585
2353 107 0 110 35 113 74
2354 8 0 11 90 14 284
2355 14 0 40 15 146 36
2356 2 0 50 25 221 135
2357 1,584 335 1,600 500 1,655 708
2358 247 50 365 70 365 77
2359 562 30 625 100 810 420
2360 2 0 10 5 62 22
2361 52 5 72 20 99 29
2362 265 0 300 40 331 120
2363 170 0 200 20 239 37
2364 66 10 69 30 72 46
2365 90 0 100 10 108 23
2366 560 50 650 175 738 248
2367 57 1,000 58 1,200 58 1,355
2368 400 200 500 400 507 622
2369 344 500 344 600 344 772
2370 0 1,300 0 1,100 0 787
2371 1,329 200 1,329 350 1,329 503
2372 1,334 300 1,358 375 1,358 410
2373 1,804 75 1,804 200 1,804 436
2374 0 2,500 0 2,200 0 2,096
2375 100 4,000 480 5,000 480 5,300
2376 1,500 1,250 2,000 1,400 2,113 1,441
2377 700 1,000 1,400 1,200 1,625 1,209
2378 18 3,500 18 2,900 18 1,774
2379 528 300 528 400 528 442
2380 1,184 100 1,184 200 1,184 368
2381 705 45 705 90 705 124
2382 1,225 75 1,225 150 1,225 321
TABLE -1: TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS AND EMPLOYMENT ASSUMED FOR 2020, 2030, AND 2040
2020 2030 2040
TAZ Households Employment Households Employment Households Employment
2383 517 25 517 50 517 69
2384 3,010 350 3,010 550 3,010 836
2385 1,099 1,500 1,088 1,300 1,088 1,211
2386 2,146 80 2,146 200 2,146 478
2387 1,960 200 1,971 500 1,971 509
2388 2,049 350 2,477 600 2,477 815
2389 812 75 813 500 813 611
2390 156 5 161 30 166 77
2391 3 350 3 200 3 143
2392 5 1,050 5 1,150 5 1,783
2393 46 75 66 200 83 444
2394 0 0 0 0 2 0
2395 42 5 50 300 144 936
2396 3 0 3 0 3 0
2397 19 130 24 200 30 430
2398 75 900 100 1,100 136 1,454
2399 11 400 50 500 186 1,112
2400 1,239 440 1,239 400 1,239 390
2401 2 1,600 2 1,400 2 1,199
2402 1,715 1,475 1,715 1,500 1,715 1,503
2403 1,584 650 1,700 900 1,708 1,638
2404 1,082 205 1,100 400 1,148 691
2405 1,448 50 1,448 100 1,448 193
2406 982 200 982 250 982 272
2407 1,274 300 1,275 500 1,275 726
2408 3,319 1,200 3,319 1,400 3,319 1,560
2409 777 10 777 20 777 22
2410 475 20 475 100 475 301
2411 0 2,000 100 1,800 446 1,405
2412 0 6,900 0 5,500 0 4,817
2413 400 2,700 400 2,600 400 2,266
2414 0 900 0 1,100 0 1,219
2415 994 1,500 994 1,400 994 1,259
2416 2,066 600 2,070 1,000 2,072 1,335
TABLE -1: TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS AND EMPLOYMENT ASSUMED FOR 2020, 2030, AND 2040
2020 2030 2040
TAZ Households Employment Households Employment Households Employment
2417 792 425 792 462 792 462
2418 1,920 6,000 1,920 5,000 1,920 4,633
2419 1,900 5,000 2,000 6,000 2,000 6,965
2420 1,216 125 1,216 200 1,216 257
2421 618 0 700 100 717 192
2422 35 5 37 10 37 10
2423 175 15 250 50 325 81
2424 782 100 797 200 797 318
2425 1,470 20 1,500 175 1,529 283
2426 1,340 75 1,600 500 1,702 1,249
2427 930 30 1,000 100 1,024 361
2428 450 900 800 1,200 901 1,276
2429 20 0 500 1,000 789 2,570
2430 252 1,250 252 1,150 252 1,138
2431 96 1,650 96 1,500 96 1,455
2432 421 2,000 500 2,100 565 2,168
2433 0 3,700 0 5,000 0 5,349
2434 0 2,800 0 2,850 0 2,850
2435 0 2,000 0 3,000 0 4,007
2436 0 2,300 0 4,000 0 4,441
2437 1,150 100 1,150 250 1,150 356
2438 50 300 280 750 282 1,036
2439 286 20 286 10 286 13
2440 1,100 300 1,153 450 1,153 559
2441 375 680 376 670 376 660
2442 1 1,000 176 1,500 176 1,684
2443 1,512 500 1,500 750 1,449 914
2444 1,800 550 2,000 2,000 2,089 2,580
2445 220 50 520 600 550 700
2446 940 150 940 1,500 940 4,000
2447 0 770 0 770 0 770
2448 0 1,600 200 2,000 200 2,452
2449 0 3,500 200 3,800 200 3,972
2450 0 2,500 200 3,200 200 3,742
TABLE -1: TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS AND EMPLOYMENT ASSUMED FOR 2020, 2030, AND 2040
2020 2030 2040
TAZ Households Employment Households Employment Households Employment
2451 221 1,400 221 1,300 221 1,189
2452 288 610 288 575 288 547
2453 800 50 2,500 5,000 3,719 10,762
2454 500 1,000 2,500 1,800 3,388 2,369
2455 1,450 50 1,475 400 1,500 580
2456 1,431 300 1,434 400 1,434 448
2457 580 20 765 150 1,099 313
2458 1,669 75 1,669 150 1,669 272
2459 580 50 1,100 650 1,400 884
2460 1 0 1 250 1 472
2461 400 50 2,900 700 3,208 1,399
2462 1,125 50 1,242 500 1,242 918
2463 1,192 30 1,192 500 1,192 539
2464 600 200 767 300 767 369
2465 600 75 877 325 877 392
2466 10 35 50 100 117 159
2467 365 90 445 100 535 121
2468 250 30 500 100 547 189
2469 100 0 2,000 350 3,243 812
2470 0 0 0 0 0 0
2471 0 0 30 10 79 23
2472 0 0 0 0 0 0
2473 20 0 500 100 1,120 308
2474 24 0 80 30 200 66
2475 10 0 2,085 500 2,780 662
2476 150 15 1,200 150 1,370 321
2477 1,600 0 2,100 200 2,305 616
2478 855 0 1,500 300 2,236 479
2479 27 5 33 10 33 11
2480 200 20 300 150 396 548
2481 820 1,400 1,150 1,350 1,454 1,302
2482 1,100 0 1,800 400 2,094 1,059
2483 260 20 420 100 462 131
2484 7 0 12 0 18 3
TABLE -1: TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS AND EMPLOYMENT ASSUMED FOR 2020, 2030, AND 2040
2020 2030 2040
TAZ Households Employment Households Employment Households Employment
2485 400 600 426 1,200 426 1,420
2486 308 180 606 195 606 195
2487 6 0 50 20 403 95
2488 300 0 1,100 200 1,562 379
2489 650 0 1,200 200 1,696 381
2490 220 10 300 150 500 328
2491 430 10 460 100 480 262
2492 400 2,500 400 2,750 401 2,983
2493 16 300 17 400 17 493
2494 500 600 591 700 591 795
2495 650 420 660 480 662 485
2496 329 2,700 329 2,500 329 2,126
2497 422 2,900 422 3,000 422 3,009
2498 815 30 925 100 1,075 188
2499 85 10 100 20 113 35
2500 900 40 920 175 929 251
2501 854 15 856 50 856 70
2502 970 50 990 200 995 503
2503 602 800 750 800 750 820
2504 600 2,000 600 2,000 600 1,536
2505 1 640 1 750 1 963
2506 204 80 204 130 204 191
2507 370 500 516 675 516 901
2508 1,190 40 1,338 100 1,338 168
2509 500 20 747 100 747 145
2510 925 40 1,069 200 1,069 432
2511 265 30 350 80 400 136
2512 49 0 75 20 107 35
2513 150 15 172 40 196 80
2514 100 50 200 100 226 208
2515 130 120 180 200 197 333
2516 1,380 700 1,508 1,000 1,508 1,041
2517 90 70 100 500 177 2,320
2518 865 20 869 100 869 260
TABLE -1: TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS AND EMPLOYMENT ASSUMED FOR 2020, 2030, AND 2040
2020 2030 2040
TAZ Households Employment Households Employment Households Employment
2519 800 20 988 190 988 194
2520 60 0 90 15 135 35
2521 792 20 862 900 862 954
2522 520 15 535 200 535 223
2523 500 10 763 190 763 192
2524 112 15 113 40 113 65
2525 15 375 15 400 15 500
2526 520 250 650 350 1,059 621
2527 133 5 150 20 176 54
2528 225 10 315 50 350 101
2529 170 10 250 40 329 84
2530 1,580 40 1,580 200 1,580 391
2531 620 400 800 500 914 550
2532 1,100 2,600 1,383 3,000 1,383 3,243
2533 1 10 1 10 1 9
2534 1 150 1 500 1 1,118
2535 31 700 31 900 31 1,204
2536 727 15 727 30 727 38
2537 589 10 590 100 590 156
2538 1,134 20 1,143 75 1,143 174
2539 650 40 701 300 701 604
2540 525 100 525 200 525 295
2541 300 5 603 50 603 111
2542 75 5 152 150 152 334
2543 675 20 675 75 675 101
2544 770 300 1,167 800 1,167 863
2545 3 500 0 1,000 0 2,153
2546 0 1,750 0 2,100 0 2,720
2547 57 1,700 57 1,500 57 1,340
2548 214 140 500 350 1,325 510
2549 924 20 987 100 987 150
2550 2 1,000 2 1,200 2 1,398
2551 417 500 417 516 417 516
2552 210 30 300 60 367 117
TABLE -1: TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS AND EMPLOYMENT ASSUMED FOR 2020, 2030, AND 2040
2020 2030 2040
TAZ Households Employment Households Employment Households Employment
2553 525 40 590 80 766 156
2554 681 140 698 200 698 431
2555 25 580 25 600 25 621
2556 69 525 69 500 69 432
2557 417 1,200 510 1,300 510 1,359
2558 101 10 150 1,000 609 2,541
2559 150 25 250 50 513 156
2560 245 15 255 35 258 56
2561 11 10 17 500 17 725
2562 8 0 15 0 1,004 250
2563 37 0 50 50 248 1,068
2564 17 0 500 50 2,096 506
2565 4 400 20 600 62 917
2566 157 900 257 1,350 257 1,622
2567 75 750 75 1,200 75 1,858
2568 153 100 153 115 153 115
2569 435 30 501 70 501 79
2570 415 25 600 150 1,526 443
2571 166 250 400 300 596 350
2572 1,140 25 1,500 250 2,166 530
2573 38 6 100 60 287 313
2574 560 100 750 250 1,169 510
2575 40 0 60 15 87 28
2576 150 15 200 40 447 105
2577 1,527 35 1,550 100 1,572 173
2578 676 10 678 20 678 30
2579 460 25 700 70 913 179
2580 713 15 760 80 814 211
2581 174 350 275 400 376 446
2582 384 1,000 385 1,250 385 1,530
2583 730 50 730 100 730 209
2584 443 25 447 50 447 87
2585 334 30 400 80 526 162
2586 6 0 20 10 103 29
TABLE -1: TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS AND EMPLOYMENT ASSUMED FOR 2020, 2030, AND 2040
2020 2030 2040
TAZ Households Employment Households Employment Households Employment
2587 3 0 15 5 79 18
2588 16 5 24 10 24 13
2589 25 0 46 10 71 23
2590 90 10 135 25 185 40
2591 25 0 50 10 80 26
2592 52 0 64 10 78 19
2593 41 243 65 200 98 121
2594 266 30 400 70 541 129
2595 900 50 2,000 600 3,458 937
2596 324 100 400 450 1,828 613
2597 65 0 300 500 1,638 2,027
2598 150 0 165 10 188 35
2599 123 0 135 5 150 18
2600 42 0 60 15 231 50
2601 17 0 18 0 18 0
2602 820 50 1,250 100 1,726 573
2603 30 10 50 30 107 50
2604 72 30 175 70 1,012 253
2605 6 10 7 8 7 8
2606 6 0 20 0 83 18
2607 6 0 13 4 13 4
2608 9 0 15 0 21 3
2609 8 0 14 5 14 8
2610 82 10 140 30 219 81
2611 90 10 130 40 175 130
2612 36 0 44 5 59 13
2613 120 10 140 20 163 47
2614 197 0 220 20 266 76
2615 35 100 38 200 38 438
2616 9 0 9 0 9 0
2617 450 20 500 100 538 183
2618 280 100 350 200 833 831
2619 103 17 145 50 200 202
2620 86 0 110 15 173 50
TABLE -1: TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS AND EMPLOYMENT ASSUMED FOR 2020, 2030, AND 2040
2020 2030 2040
TAZ Households Employment Households Employment Households Employment
2621 200 10 280 50 342 188
Total 128,878 123,406 167,315 168,535 201,962 220,276
Prepared by Douglas County Department of Community Development, January 2018
2040 TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN