2192a505-8cb1-45fa-86d3-efdc30b0b7d4fle1????? … g. a. (2002). public and private manageme studies...

10
( p ) 01 . 0 p ) 01 . 0 ( p - Ali mail: - E - i_nasery@ed edu.ui.ac

Upload: vodang

Post on 03-May-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1 Meyer2 Wright & Pandey3 Crewson4 Houston5 Lewis & Frank6 Wittmer7 Buchanan8 Caciope & Mock9 Kilpatrick, Cummings & Jennings10 Jurkiewicz, Massey, & Brown11 Khojasteh12 Kilpatrick et al.13 Lawler14 Newstorm, Reif, & Monczka15 Rawls, Ulrich, & Nelson16 Boyne17 Wright

Meyer

Wright & Pandey

Crewson

Houston

Lewis & Frank

Wittmer

Buchanan

Caciope & Mock

Kilpatrick, Cummings & JenningsJurkiewicz, Massey, & BrownKhojasteh

Kilpatrick et al.

Lawler

Newstorm, Reif, & MonczkaRawls, Ulrich, & NelsonBoyne

Wright

Kilpatrick, Cummings & Jennings

Jurkiewicz, Massey, & Brown

Newstorm, Reif, & Monczka

Rawls, Ulrich, & Nelson

1 Brewer2 Kristof

Brewer

Kristof-Brown, Zimmerman, Johnson

Brown, Zimmerman, Johnson

Brown, Zimmerman, Johnson

1 Public Sector Motivation (PSM)2 Overall Job Satisfaction3 Person

Public Sector Motivation (PSM)Overall Job SatisfactionPerson-Organization Fit

Public Sector Motivation (PSM)Overall Job Satisfaction

Organization Fit

Public Sector Motivation (PSM)

SPSS

*p<0.01

*p<0.01

P 0.01

1 Baron & Kenny

.

0.01

Baron & Kenny

T

B

Alonso, P., & Lewis, G. (2001). Public service motivation and job performance: Evidencefederal sector.

Balfour, D. L., & Wechsler, B. (1990). Organizational commitment: A Reconceptualization and empirical test of public

Alonso, P., & Lewis, G. (2001). Public service motivation and job performance: Evidencefederal sector.

Balfour, D. L., & Wechsler, B. (1990). Organizational commitment: A Reconceptualization and empirical test of public

Alonso, P., & Lewis, G. (2001). Public service motivation and job performance: Evidencefederal sector. American Review of Public Administration

Balfour, D. L., & Wechsler, B. (1990). Organizational commitment: A Reconceptualization and empirical test of public-private differences.

p<0/01

Alonso, P., & Lewis, G. (2001). Public service motivation and job performance: EvidenceAmerican Review of Public Administration

Balfour, D. L., & Wechsler, B. (1990). Organizational commitment: A Reconceptualization and private differences.

p<0/01

Alonso, P., & Lewis, G. (2001). Public service motivation and job performance: EvidenceAmerican Review of Public Administration

Balfour, D. L., & Wechsler, B. (1990). Organizational commitment: A Reconceptualization and private differences. Review of Public Personnel Administration

Alonso, P., & Lewis, G. (2001). Public service motivation and job performance: EvidenceAmerican Review of Public Administration, 31(4), 363

Balfour, D. L., & Wechsler, B. (1990). Organizational commitment: A Reconceptualization and Review of Public Personnel Administration

Alonso, P., & Lewis, G. (2001). Public service motivation and job performance: Evidence31(4), 363-380.

Balfour, D. L., & Wechsler, B. (1990). Organizational commitment: A Reconceptualization and Review of Public Personnel Administration

p<0.01

Alonso, P., & Lewis, G. (2001). Public service motivation and job performance: Evidence380.

Balfour, D. L., & Wechsler, B. (1990). Organizational commitment: A Reconceptualization and Review of Public Personnel Administration

p<0.01

Alonso, P., & Lewis, G. (2001). Public service motivation and job performance: Evidence from the

Balfour, D. L., & Wechsler, B. (1990). Organizational commitment: A Reconceptualization and Review of Public Personnel Administration, 10, 23-

from the

Balfour, D. L., & Wechsler, B. (1990). Organizational commitment: A Reconceptualization and 40.

Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private manageme

StudiesBrewer, G. (2008) Employee and Organizational Performance , in J.L. Perry and A. Hondeghem

Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service,University Press.

Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizationalperformance in federal agencies. 711.

Buchanan, B. (1975). GovePublic Administration Review

Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions.

Cacioppe, R., & Mock, P. (1984). A comparison of the quality of work experience in governmentprivate organizations. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979).

Questionnaire.Crewson, P. E. (1997). Public

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,Frank,

American Review of Public AdministrationHoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person

organization fitHouston, D. J. (2000). Public

Research & Theory

Jurkiewicz, C. L., Massey, T. K., & Brown, R. organizations: A comparative study.

Khojasteh, M. (1993). Motivating the private vs. public sector managers. Management,

Kilpatrick, F. P., Cummings, M. C., Jr., & Jennings, M. K. (1964). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Kim, S. (2005). IndividualJournal of

Kristofwork: A metaPersonnel Psychology

Lawler, E. E. (1971). Hill.

Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private manageme

Studies, 39(1), 97Brewer, G. (2008) Employee and Organizational Performance , in J.L. Perry and A. Hondeghem

Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service,University Press.

Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizationalperformance in federal agencies. 711.

Buchanan, B. (1975). GovePublic Administration Review

Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions.

Cacioppe, R., & Mock, P. (1984). A comparison of the quality of work experience in governmentprivate organizations. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979).

Questionnaire.Crewson, P. E. (1997). Public

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,Frank,

S. A., & Lewis, G. B. (2004). Government employees: Working hard or hardly working?American Review of Public Administration

Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between personorganization fit

Houston, D. J. (2000). PublicResearch & Theory

Jurkiewicz, C. L., Massey, T. K., & Brown, R. organizations: A comparative study.

Khojasteh, M. (1993). Motivating the private vs. public sector managers. Management,

ilpatrick, F. P., Cummings, M. C., Jr., & Jennings, M. K. (1964). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Kim, S. (2005). IndividualJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory,

Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals fit at work: A metaPersonnel Psychology

Lawler, E. E. (1971). Hill.

Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private manageme

, 39(1), 97-122.

Brewer, G. (2008) Employee and Organizational Performance , in J.L. Perry and A. Hondeghem

Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service,University Press.

Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizationalperformance in federal agencies.

Buchanan, B. (1975). GovePublic Administration Review

Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit

Journal of Applied PsychologyCacioppe, R., & Mock, P. (1984). A comparison of the quality of work experience in government

private organizations. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979).

Questionnaire.

Ann Arbor:University of Michigan. Crewson, P. E. (1997). Public

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,S. A., & Lewis, G. B. (2004). Government employees: Working hard or hardly working?

American Review of Public AdministrationHoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person

organization fit

and behavioral outcomes. Houston, D. J. (2000). Public

Research & Theory

10(4), 713

Jurkiewicz, C. L., Massey, T. K., & Brown, R. organizations: A comparative study.

Khojasteh, M. (1993). Motivating the private vs. public sector managers. Management,

22(3), 391ilpatrick, F. P., Cummings, M. C., Jr., & Jennings, M. K. (1964). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Kim, S. (2005). IndividualPublic Administration Research and Theory,

Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals fit at work: A meta-analysis of personPersonnel Psychology, 58, 281

Lawler, E. E. (1971). Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view

Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private manageme

Brewer, G. (2008) Employee and Organizational Performance , in J.L. Perry and A. Hondeghem

Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service,

Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizationalperformance in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and

Buchanan, B. (1975). Government managers, business executives, and organizational commitment.Public Administration Review, 34(4), 339

Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit Journal of Applied Psychology

Cacioppe, R., & Mock, P. (1984). A comparison of the quality of work experience in governmentHuman Relations

Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979). Ann Arbor:University of Michigan.

Crewson, P. E. (1997). Public-service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidenceJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory,

S. A., & Lewis, G. B. (2004). Government employees: Working hard or hardly working?American Review of Public Administration

Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between personand behavioral outcomes.

Houston, D. J. (2000). Public-service motivation: A multivariate test. 10(4), 713-727.

Jurkiewicz, C. L., Massey, T. K., & Brown, R. organizations: A comparative study.

Khojasteh, M. (1993). Motivating the private vs. public sector managers. 22(3), 391-401.

ilpatrick, F. P., Cummings, M. C., Jr., & Jennings, M. K. (1964). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Kim, S. (2005). Individual-level factors and organizational performance in government organizations.Public Administration Research and Theory,

Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals fit at analysis of person-job, person

, 58, 281 342.Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view

Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private manageme

Brewer, G. (2008) Employee and Organizational Performance , in J.L. Perry and A. Hondeghem

Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service,

Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizationalJournal of Public Administration Research and

rnment managers, business executives, and organizational commitment., 34(4), 339-347.

Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875

Cacioppe, R., & Mock, P. (1984). A comparison of the quality of work experience in governmentHuman Relations, 37(11), 923

Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979). Ann Arbor:University of Michigan.

service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidenceJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory,

S. A., & Lewis, G. B. (2004). Government employees: Working hard or hardly working?American Review of Public Administration, 34(1), 36

Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between personand behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior

service motivation: A multivariate test. 727.

Jurkiewicz, C. L., Massey, T. K., & Brown, R. organizations: A comparative study. Public Productivity & Management Review

Khojasteh, M. (1993). Motivating the private vs. public sector managers.

ilpatrick, F. P., Cummings, M. C., Jr., & Jennings, M. K. (1964). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

level factors and organizational performance in government organizations.Public Administration Research and Theory,

Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals fit at job, person-organization,person

342.

Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view

Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private management: What s the difference?

Brewer, G. (2008) Employee and Organizational Performance , in J.L. Perry and A. Hondeghem

Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service,

Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizationalJournal of Public Administration Research and

rnment managers, business executives, and organizational commitment.

Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit 87, 875 884.

Cacioppe, R., & Mock, P. (1984). A comparison of the quality of work experience in government, 37(11), 923-940.

Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979). Ann Arbor:University of Michigan.

service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidenceJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory,

4, 499S. A., & Lewis, G. B. (2004). Government employees: Working hard or hardly working?

, 34(1), 36-51. Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person

Journal of Vocational Behaviorservice motivation: A multivariate test.

Jurkiewicz, C. L., Massey, T. K., & Brown, R. G. (1998). Motivation in public and privatePublic Productivity & Management Review

Khojasteh, M. (1993). Motivating the private vs. public sector managers.

ilpatrick, F. P., Cummings, M. C., Jr., & Jennings, M. K. (1964).

level factors and organizational performance in government organizations.Public Administration Research and Theory,

15(2), 245Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals fit at

organization,person

Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view

nt: What s the difference?

Brewer, G. (2008) Employee and Organizational Performance , in J.L. Perry and A. Hondeghem

Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service,

pp. 136

Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizationalJournal of Public Administration Research and

rnment managers, business executives, and organizational commitment.

Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit

Cacioppe, R., & Mock, P. (1984). A comparison of the quality of work experience in government940.

Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan Organizational Assessment

service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidence4, 499-518.

S. A., & Lewis, G. B. (2004). Government employees: Working hard or hardly working?

Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between personJournal of Vocational Behavior

service motivation: A multivariate test. Journal of Public

G. (1998). Motivation in public and privatePublic Productivity & Management Review

Khojasteh, M. (1993). Motivating the private vs. public sector managers.

ilpatrick, F. P., Cummings, M. C., Jr., & Jennings, M. K. (1964). The image of the federal

level factors and organizational performance in government organizations.15(2), 245-262.

Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals fit at organization,person-group, and person

Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view

nt: What s the difference? Journal of Management

Brewer, G. (2008) Employee and Organizational Performance , in J.L. Perry and A. Hondeghem

pp. 136 56. Oxford: Ox

Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizationalJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory

rnment managers, business executives, and organizational commitment.

Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit

Cacioppe, R., & Mock, P. (1984). A comparison of the quality of work experience in government

igan Organizational Assessment

service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidence

S. A., & Lewis, G. B. (2004). Government employees: Working hard or hardly working?

Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between personJournal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 389

Journal of Public

G. (1998). Motivation in public and privatePublic Productivity & Management Review, 21(3),

Khojasteh, M. (1993). Motivating the private vs. public sector managers. Public Personnel

The image of the federal

level factors and organizational performance in government organizations.262.

Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals fit at group, and person

Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view. New York: McGraw

Journal of Management

Brewer, G. (2008) Employee and Organizational Performance , in J.L. Perry and A. Hondeghem

56. Oxford: Ox

Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizationalTheory, 10(4), 685

rnment managers, business executives, and organizational commitment.

Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit

Cacioppe, R., & Mock, P. (1984). A comparison of the quality of work experience in government

igan Organizational Assessment

service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidence and effect.

S. A., & Lewis, G. B. (2004). Government employees: Working hard or hardly working?

Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person399.

Journal of Public Administration

G. (1998). Motivation in public and private, 21(3), 230-250.

Public Personnel

The image of the federal service.

level factors and organizational performance in government organizations.

Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals fit at group, and person-supervisor fit

. New York: McGraw

Journal of Management

Brewer, G. (2008) Employee and Organizational Performance , in J.L. Perry and A. Hondeghem Eds)

56. Oxford: Oxford

Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizational, 10(4), 685-

rnment managers, business executives, and organizational commitment.

Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit

Cacioppe, R., & Mock, P. (1984). A comparison of the quality of work experience in government and

igan Organizational Assessment

and effect.

S. A., & Lewis, G. B. (2004). Government employees: Working hard or hardly working?

Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person-

Administration

G. (1998). Motivation in public and private250.

Public Personnel

service.

level factors and organizational performance in government organizations.

Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals fit at supervisor fit.

. New York: McGraw-

Lewis, G. B., & Frank, S. A. (2002). Who wants to work for the government?

Review,Naff, K. C., & Crum, J. (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a

difference? Newstrom, J. W., Reif,W. E., & Monczka, R. M. (1976). Motivating the public employee: Fact

fiction. Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and

validity. Perry, J.L. and Wise, L.R. (1990). The Motivational Bases of Public Service.

Review,Rainey, H. G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service

ethic.Rawls, J. R., Ullrich, R. A., & Nelson, O. T. (1975). A comparison of managers entering or reentering

the profit and nonprofit sectors.Wittmer, D. (1991). Serving the peop

hybrid sector and business managers. Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of Person

Organiza502

Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of PersonOrganization Fit: Testing the Mediating Effect of Value Congrue502

Wright, B. E. (2001). Public sector work motivation: Review of current literature and a revised conceptual model.

Lewis, G. B., & Frank, S. A. (2002). Who wants to work for the government?

Review,

62(4), 39

Naff, K. C., & Crum, J. (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a difference? Review of Public Personnel Administration

Newstrom, J. W., Reif,W. E., & Monczka, R. M. (1976). Motivating the public employee: Factfiction. Public Personnel Management

Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,

Perry, J.L. and Wise, L.R. (1990). The Motivational Bases of Public Service. Review,

50(3): 367Rainey, H. G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service

ethic.

American Review of PuRawls, J. R., Ullrich, R. A., & Nelson, O. T. (1975). A comparison of managers entering or reentering

the profit and nonprofit sectors.Wittmer, D. (1991). Serving the peop

hybrid sector and business managers. Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of Person

Organization Fit: Testing the Mediating Effect of Value Congruence. 502-521.

Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of PersonOrganization Fit: Testing the Mediating Effect of Value Congrue502-521.

Wright, B. E. (2001). Public sector work motivation: Review of current literature and a revised conceptual model.

Lewis, G. B., & Frank, S. A. (2002). Who wants to work for the government? 62(4), 395-404.

Naff, K. C., & Crum, J. (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a Review of Public Personnel Administration

Newstrom, J. W., Reif,W. E., & Monczka, R. M. (1976). Motivating the public employee: FactPublic Personnel Management

Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,

Perry, J.L. and Wise, L.R. (1990). The Motivational Bases of Public Service. 50(3): 367 73.

Rainey, H. G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service American Review of Pu

Rawls, J. R., Ullrich, R. A., & Nelson, O. T. (1975). A comparison of managers entering or reentering the profit and nonprofit sectors.

Wittmer, D. (1991). Serving the peophybrid sector and business managers.

Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of Persontion Fit: Testing the Mediating Effect of Value Congruence.

Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of PersonOrganization Fit: Testing the Mediating Effect of Value Congrue

Wright, B. E. (2001). Public sector work motivation: Review of current literature and a revised conceptual model.

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,

Lewis, G. B., & Frank, S. A. (2002). Who wants to work for the government? 404.

Naff, K. C., & Crum, J. (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a

Review of Public Personnel AdministrationNewstrom, J. W., Reif,W. E., & Monczka, R. M. (1976). Motivating the public employee: Fact

Public Personnel ManagementPerry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,Perry, J.L. and Wise, L.R. (1990). The Motivational Bases of Public Service.

Rainey, H. G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service American Review of Public Administration,

Rawls, J. R., Ullrich, R. A., & Nelson, O. T. (1975). A comparison of managers entering or reentering the profit and nonprofit sectors.

Academy of Management JournalWittmer, D. (1991). Serving the peop

hybrid sector and business managers. Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of Person

tion Fit: Testing the Mediating Effect of Value Congruence.

Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of PersonOrganization Fit: Testing the Mediating Effect of Value Congrue

Wright, B. E. (2001). Public sector work motivation: Review of current literature and a revised Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,

Lewis, G. B., & Frank, S. A. (2002). Who wants to work for the government?

Naff, K. C., & Crum, J. (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a Review of Public Personnel Administration

Newstrom, J. W., Reif,W. E., & Monczka, R. M. (1976). Motivating the public employee: FactPublic Personnel Management, 5, 67-72.

Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,

Perry, J.L. and Wise, L.R. (1990). The Motivational Bases of Public Service.

Rainey, H. G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service blic Administration,

Rawls, J. R., Ullrich, R. A., & Nelson, O. T. (1975). A comparison of managers entering or reentering Academy of Management Journal

Wittmer, D. (1991). Serving the people or serving for pay: Reward preferences among government, hybrid sector and business managers. Public Productivity & Management Review

Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of Persontion Fit: Testing the Mediating Effect of Value Congruence.

Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of PersonOrganization Fit: Testing the Mediating Effect of Value Congrue

Wright, B. E. (2001). Public sector work motivation: Review of current literature and a revised Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,

Lewis, G. B., & Frank, S. A. (2002). Who wants to work for the government?

Naff, K. C., & Crum, J. (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(4), 5

Newstrom, J. W., Reif,W. E., & Monczka, R. M. (1976). Motivating the public employee: Fact72.

Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,

Perry, J.L. and Wise, L.R. (1990). The Motivational Bases of Public Service.

Rainey, H. G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service blic Administration,

16(4), 288Rawls, J. R., Ullrich, R. A., & Nelson, O. T. (1975). A comparison of managers entering or reentering

Academy of Management Journalle or serving for pay: Reward preferences among government, Public Productivity & Management Review

Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of Persontion Fit: Testing the Mediating Effect of Value Congruence.

Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of PersonOrganization Fit: Testing the Mediating Effect of Value Congrue

Wright, B. E. (2001). Public sector work motivation: Review of current literature and a revised Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,

Lewis, G. B., & Frank, S. A. (2002). Who wants to work for the government?

Naff, K. C., & Crum, J. (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a , 19(4), 5-16.

Newstrom, J. W., Reif,W. E., & Monczka, R. M. (1976). Motivating the public employee: Fact

Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,

7(1), 5Perry, J.L. and Wise, L.R. (1990). The Motivational Bases of Public Service.

Rainey, H. G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service 16(4), 288-302.

Rawls, J. R., Ullrich, R. A., & Nelson, O. T. (1975). A comparison of managers entering or reentering Academy of Management Journal, 18(3), 616

le or serving for pay: Reward preferences among government, Public Productivity & Management Review

Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of Persontion Fit: Testing the Mediating Effect of Value Congruence.

Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of PersonOrganization Fit: Testing the Mediating Effect of Value Congruence.

Wright, B. E. (2001). Public sector work motivation: Review of current literature and a revised Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,

Lewis, G. B., & Frank, S. A. (2002). Who wants to work for the government? Public Administration

Naff, K. C., & Crum, J. (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a

Newstrom, J. W., Reif,W. E., & Monczka, R. M. (1976). Motivating the public employee: Fact

Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and 7(1), 5-22.

Perry, J.L. and Wise, L.R. (1990). The Motivational Bases of Public Service.

Public Administration

Rainey, H. G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service

Rawls, J. R., Ullrich, R. A., & Nelson, O. T. (1975). A comparison of managers entering or reentering , 18(3), 616-623.

le or serving for pay: Reward preferences among government, Public Productivity & Management Review, 14(4), 369

Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of Persontion Fit: Testing the Mediating Effect of Value Congruence. Administration & society

Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of Personnce. Administration & society

Wright, B. E. (2001). Public sector work motivation: Review of current literature and a revised Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,

11(4), 559

Public Administration

Naff, K. C., & Crum, J. (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a

Newstrom, J. W., Reif,W. E., & Monczka, R. M. (1976). Motivating the public employee: Fact

Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and

Public Administration

Rainey, H. G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service

Rawls, J. R., Ullrich, R. A., & Nelson, O. T. (1975). A comparison of managers entering or reentering

le or serving for pay: Reward preferences among government, , 14(4), 369-383.

Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of PersonAdministration & society

Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of PersonAdministration & society

Wright, B. E. (2001). Public sector work motivation: Review of current literature and a revised 11(4), 559-586.

Public Administration

Naff, K. C., & Crum, J. (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a

Newstrom, J. W., Reif,W. E., & Monczka, R. M. (1976). Motivating the public employee: Fact

vs.

Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and

Public Administration

Rainey, H. G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service

Rawls, J. R., Ullrich, R. A., & Nelson, O. T. (1975). A comparison of managers entering or reentering

le or serving for pay: Reward preferences among government, 383.

Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of Person- Administration & society, 40,

Wright, B. E. & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of Person- Administration & society, 40,

Wright, B. E. (2001). Public sector work motivation: Review of current literature and a revised

This document was created with Win2PDF available at http://www.daneprairie.com.The unregistered version of Win2PDF is for evaluation or non-commercial use only.