26th hindu

2
lrlOtt-rAluILFr! TI-TE }{I,$NIJ I+: FRII}AY, JL]Ntr 26,2015 i' ili tt;l r,: il . :.'i .:1 l. . ::t. ,' i;:r: ii:::.i l:!,r:.:: '-: ll l-r.- -Eit. i.: 'l1. l iilE.,:.':: :11:.J: ,i:, ..:.1.:i:j:lr -:--1 >-l ,' ;.1 i i+ .* i.E :an ,:z ',* h -';t .t ;: ': ijt It 'E ,e -i:3 t4 I .E ,3 ,.? L ,s i+I ,H .ld ,\& {A ;# "LF ffi ,-ffi ,,8 -,# :* ,,,s ..-c* 'E -tr lrt -a# '.rtt ;€ .aiP rJ& ts 6 ,tr5 H rB -.;# -::a .-€.* # ffi :i# alw -ffi : ..1.59 lffi-. # # ,EE .itr- .,ffi . ;'#s ffi ..i3d ::i& .;'w :}H :# -'1g r l+SF -# ,ffi 'iffi '',_:EI is& ' ,*q* ,ffi :'ffi EqudlnimitY af temPer In life we sometimes get what we desire-' Sometimes' ** *rrd up having sornething we certainly do not want' But the man wh; has underitood the nature of the ,t*u and of the operation of karma is indifferent to -"-r:rthing in this world. He is not overjoyed by some event, nor moved to sorrow by another. He remains calrn, whatever experience he has in life. Naturally, the qlestion now arises whether one should nev;; aefilfrt in anythin$. Suppose sgmegttt': , child has scorea flgl, marks in an examination, should she not b. h;tpy? [r u man loses all his wealth, should he not mour; frir loss? The answer would be that whether it is the success of his child in an examination, or loss of wealth- it is all due to past karma' The success was determined in accordance with karma and so it came to her child. The loss of wealth was also pi"-a*termined, because of past karma' So ;hy;ho,la ,ne celebrate success or worry over loss? They are the results of one's own actions in previous births. Moreover there is nothing that is universally liked by everyone, said valayapet Ramachariar, in a discourse. , 'What one man likes may not be to the taste of another. The Same person may also have different i .attitudes towards an object or towards another person at different times. Suppose someone dear to us is ill' \Me have -;"Gh affecfio, and regard for the person to i;H; ;br*rJ., if he were to depart from thls world', And yet sometimes we,t\inkthat exit from this world would be better for him than ail that suffering. so here we have the same person responding in two different ways o, t*o diffeient occasions. So our reactions to *oitaly possessions and towards people are impermanent. The atmi is undying and its connection to the suprem* orr. is what we rnust constantly think of, ui*i"g foi moksha. While on this earth, we must face whatever our karma places in our life with equanimity of temper'

Upload: aishwarya

Post on 05-Sep-2015

241 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

the hindu

TRANSCRIPT

  • lrlOtt-rAluILFr!

    TI-TE }{I,$NIJ I+: FRII}AY, JL]Ntr 26,2015 i'ili

    tt;lr,: il

    . :.'i

    .:1 l.

    .

    ::t. ,'

    i;:r: ii:::.i

    l:!,r:.::

    '-: ll l-r.-

    -Eit. i.:

    'l1. l

    iilE.,:.':::11:.J: ,i:,..:.1.:i:j:lr-:--1 >-l

    ,'

    ;.1

    ii+

    .*

    i.E:an

    ,:z

    ',*

    h

    -';t.t

    ;:':ijtIt

    'E

    ,e-i:3t4I.E

    ,3,.?L,si+I,H

    .ld,\&{A;#"LFffi

    ,-ffi,,8

    -,#:*,,,s..-c*'E-trlrt

    -a#'.rtt;.aiPrJ&ts6

    ,tr5

    HrB-.;#-::a.-.*#ffi:i#

    alw

    -ffi:

    ..1.59

    lffi-.##,EE

    .itr-.,ffi

    . ;'#sffi..i3d::i&.;'w:}H:#

    -'1gr l+SF-#,ffi

    'iffi'',_:EIis&

    ' ,*q*,ffi:'ffi

    EqudlnimitY af temPerIn life we sometimes get what we desire-' Sometimes'** *rrd up having sornething we certainly do not want'But the man wh; has underitood the nature of the,t*u and of the operation of karma is indifferent to-"-r:rthing in this world. He is not overjoyed by someevent, nor moved to sorrow by another. He remainscalrn, whatever experience he has in life.

    Naturally, the qlestion now arises whether oneshould nev;; aefilfrt in anythin$. Suppose sgmegttt': ,child has scorea flgl, marks in an examination, shouldshe not b. h;tpy? [r u man loses all his wealth, shouldhe not mour; frir loss? The answer would be thatwhether it is the success of his child in an examination,or loss of wealth- it is all due to past karma'

    The success was determined in accordance withkarma and so it came to her child. The loss of wealthwas also pi"-a*termined, because of past karma' So;hy;ho,la ,ne celebrate success or worry over loss?They are the results of one's own actions in previousbirths. Moreover there is nothing that is universallyliked by everyone, said valayapet Ramachariar, in adiscourse.

    , 'What one man likes may not be to the taste ofanother. The Same person may also have different

    i

    .attitudes towards an object or towards another personat different times. Suppose someone dear to us is ill'\Me have -;"Gh affecfio, and regard for the person toi;H; ;br*rJ., if he were to depart from thls world',And yet sometimes we,t\inkthat exit from this worldwould be better for him than ail that suffering. so herewe have the same person responding in two differentways o, t*o diffeient occasions. So our reactions to*oitaly possessions and towards people areimpermanent.

    The atmi is undying and its connection to thesuprem* orr. is what we rnust constantly think of,ui*i"g foi moksha. While on this earth, we must facewhatever our karma places in our life with equanimityof temper'

  • Jack I,Ia bon trust

    $ , success but before goingto r,,ig them, here is what he sivr ,i about the opposite. "We t r*ito get used to rejection, wei are not that good. Wtreir l ..i,graduated from universitv I 'applied for a job B0 times"andI got rejected. I wenf for ,,,,joining in the Police, thevsaid I was not good.,Five' ,,peoplg y.lt,f6.r, ry.+

    -

    ,

    accepted, I was the only oile .turned:do

    . tr,w,ent eventb,.lili 5IC:!4peffi,*enrf.qrithei;i{ job, 23 were accepted only I. was not. So for me furned

    ; down, rejected arei commonplace...you know Ii , applied to Haryard I0 timesi and I was rejected...and then I u.i I told myselq somed,ay I I Cti , fho."-ld go teach,there, l. in tt e mbuddy!" I few hoursi Ma's life.designed itself l,;;, i ffi;;; u..y well.."{ really fell in love I tre asked,foi with English when I was I toqethei";ri yrm rngrtsn,wnen I was I togethef:t, about IO or 12. There was no I interestiii, p,lace to learn'the language at I 'M"d;i, that time: There were no- I AfiUabait"i1 books. So went to the I olohat nd,i, ilt;,i:ffi:tJi*t?.qyas l $,*TffiI'' the only one which could I asked manv rg receive foreigners" Every I t