342 chapter 13

Upload: nneiroukh2218

Post on 07-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    1/51

    Chapter 13. Risk & Return in

    Asset Pricing Models

    Portfolio Theory

    Managing Risk

    Asset Pricing Models

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    2/51

    I. Portfolio Theory

    how does investor decide amonggroup of assets?

    assume: investors are risk averse additional compensation for risk

    tradeoff between risk and expected

    return

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    3/51

    goal

    efficient or optimal portfolio

    for a given risk, maximize exp.

    return OR

    for a given exp. return, minimize

    the risk

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    4/51

    tools

    measure risk, return

    quantify risk/return tradeoff

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    5/51

    return = R =change in asset value + income

    initial value

    Measuring Return

    R is ex post

    based on past data, and is known R is typically annualized

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    6/51

    example 1

    Tbill, 1 month holding period

    buy for $9488, sell for $9528

    1 month R:

    9528 - 9488

    9488

    = .0042 = .42%

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    7/51

    annualized R:

    (1.0042)12

    - 1 = .052 = 5.2%

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    8/51

    example 2

    100 shares IBM, 9 months

    buy for $62, sell for $101.50

    $.80 dividends 9 month R:

    101.50 - 62 + .80

    62= .65 =65%

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    9/51

    annualized R:

    (1.65)12/9

    - 1 = .95 = 95%

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    10/51

    Expected Return

    measuring likely future return

    based on probability distribution

    random variable

    E(R) = SUM(Ri x Prob(Ri))

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    11/51

    example 1

    R Prob(R)

    10% .2

    5% .4

    -5% .4

    E(R) = (.2)10% + (.4)5% + (.4)(-5%)

    = 2%

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    12/51

    example 2

    R Prob(R)

    1% .3

    2% .4

    3% .3

    E(R) = (.3)1% + (.4)2% + (.3)(3%)

    = 2%

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    13/51

    examples 1 & 2

    same expected return

    but not same return structure

    returns in example 1 are morevariable

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    14/51

    Risk

    measure likely fluctuation in return how much will R vary from E(R)

    how likely is actual R to vary fromE(R)

    measured by

    variance (s2) standard deviation (s)

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    15/51

    s2 = SUM[(Ri - E(R))2 x Prob(Ri)]

    s = SQRT(s2)

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    16/51

    example 1

    s2 = (.2)(10%-2%)2

    = .0039

    + (.4)(5%-2%)2

    + (.4)(-5%-2%)2

    s = 6.24%

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    17/51

    example 2

    s2 = (.3)(1%-2%)2

    = .00006

    + (.4)(2%-2%)2

    + (.3)(3%-2%)2

    s = .77%

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    18/51

    same expected return

    but example 2 has a lower risk

    preferred by risk averse investors variance works best with symmetric

    distributions

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    19/51

    symmetric asymmetric

    E(R)R

    prob(R)

    R

    prob(R)

    E(R)

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    20/51

    II. Managing risk

    Diversification

    holding a group of assets

    lower risk w/out lowering E(R)

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    21/51

    Why?

    individual assets do not have

    same return pattern combining assets reduces overall

    return variation

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    22/51

    two types of risk

    unsystematic risk

    specific to a firm

    can be eliminated throughdiversification

    examples:

    -- Safeway and a strike-- Microsoft and antitrust cases

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    23/51

    systematic risk

    market risk cannot be eliminated through

    diversification

    due to factors affecting all assets

    -- energy prices, interest rates,inflation, business cycles

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    24/51

    example

    choose stocks from NYSE listings

    go from 1 stock to 20 stocks

    reduce risk by 40-50%

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    25/51

    s

    # assets

    systematic

    risk

    unsystematic

    risktotal

    risk

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    26/51

    measuring relative risk

    if some risk is diversifiable,

    then sis not the best measure ofrisk

    is an absolute measure of risk

    need a measure just for the

    systematic component

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    27/51

    Beta, b variation in asset/portfolio return

    relative to return of market portfolio

    mkt. portfolio = mkt. index

    -- S&P 500 or NYSE index

    b =% change in asset return

    % change in market return

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    28/51

    interpreting b if b = 0

    asset is risk free

    if b = 1 asset return = market return

    if b > 1 asset is riskier than market index

    b < 1 asset is less risky than market index

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    29/51

    Sample betas

    Amazon 2.23

    Anheuser Busch -.107

    Microsoft 1.62

    Ford 1.31

    General Electric 1.10

    Wal Mart .80

    (monthly returns, 5 years back)

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    30/51

    measuring b estimated by regression

    data on returns of assets

    data on returns of market index estimate

    b= mRR

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    31/51

    problems

    what length for return interval?

    weekly? monthly? annually?

    choice of market index? NYSE, S&P 500

    survivor bias

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    32/51

    # of observations (how far back?)

    5 years? 50 years?

    time period?

    1970-1980?

    1990-2000?

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    33/51

    III. Asset Pricing Models

    CAPM

    Capital Asset Pricing Model

    1964, Sharpe, Linter quantifies the risk/return tradeoff

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    34/51

    assume

    investors choose risky and risk-freeasset

    no transactions costs, taxes

    same expectations, time horizon

    risk averse investors

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    35/51

    implication

    expected return is a function of

    beta

    risk free return market return

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    36/51

    ]R)R(E[R)R(E fmf b=

    or

    ]R)R(E[R)R(E fmf b=

    fR)R(E is the portfolio risk premium

    where

    fm R)R(E is the market risk premium

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    37/51

    so if b >1,

    portfolio exp. return is larger thanexp. market return

    riskier portfolio has larger exp.return

    fR)R(E fm R)R(E

    )R(E )R(Em

    >

    >

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    38/51

    so if b

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    39/51

    so if b =1,

    portfolio exp. return is same thanexp. market return

    equal risk portfolio means equal exp.return

    fR)R(E fm R)R(E

    )R(E )R(Em

    =

    =

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    40/51

    so if b = 0,

    portfolio exp. return is equal to riskfree return

    fR)R(E

    )R(Ef

    R

    = 0

    =

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    41/51

    example

    Rm = 10%, Rf = 3%, b = 2.5]R)R(E[R)R(E

    fmf

    b=

    %]3%10[5.2%3)R(E =

    %5.17%3)R(E =

    %5.20)R(E =

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    42/51

    CAPM tells us size of risk/returntradeoff

    CAPM tells use the price of risk

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    43/51

    Testing the CAPM

    CAPM overpredicts returns

    return under CAPM > actual return

    relationship between and return? some studies it is positive

    some recent studies argue no

    relationship (1992 Fama & French)

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    44/51

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    45/51

    other factors important in

    determining returns January effect

    firm size effect

    day-of-the-week effect ratio of book value to market value

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    46/51

    problems w/ testing CAPM

    Roll critique (1977)

    CAPM not testable

    do not observe E(R), only R

    do not observe true Rm

    do not observe true Rf results are sensitive to the sample

    period

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    47/51

    APT

    Arbitrage Pricing Theory

    1976, Ross

    assume: several factors affect E(R)

    does not specify factors

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    48/51

    implications

    E(R) is a function of severalfactors, F

    each with its own bNN332211f F....FFFR)R(E bbbb=

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    49/51

    APT vs. CAPM

    APT is more general

    many factors

    unspecified factors

    CAPM is a special case of the APT

    1 factor

    factor is market risk premium

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    50/51

    testing the APT

    how many factors?

    what are the factors?

    1980 Chen, Roll, and Ross industrial production

    inflation

    yield curve slope other yield spreads

  • 8/3/2019 342 Chapter 13

    51/51

    summary

    known risk/return tradeoff

    how to measure risk?

    how to price risk?

    neither CAPM or APT are perfect orfree of testing problems

    both have shown value in assetpricing