360 atlas report

8/8/2019 360 Atlas Report

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/360-atlas-report 1/12

Individual ReportSite

Danielle Lerma

Standard 360Atlas Standard 360 Survey

2010/12/07Individual report

Company Site

Survey Standard 360 Atlas standard 360 survey

Completed questionnaires 50

Date 2010/12/07

Skill overviewIndividual values

A summary of skills



Details

Parameter

Weighted

average

Answer distribution in %

Total

Strongly

agree Agree

Neither

agree nor

disagree Disagree

Strongly

disagree

Stress

management

3.5 17 23 57 3 0 35

Communication 4.0 20 57 23 0 0 40

Decision-making 3.3 3 23 75 0 0 40

Leadership 3.4 13 22 60 5 0 55

Social and

networking

4.2 40 44 15 2 0 55

Teamwork 3.8 33 25 35 7 0 55

Skills by role

Shows how each respondent role has evaluated the skill

Stress management

xx prioritizes assigned tasks under stress xx maintains a positive outlook at work

xx reacts constructively to criticism

xx uses his/her emotions constructively in difficult situations

xx works productively in stressful environments

xx maintains his/her focus in stressed situations

xx is good at spotting new opportunities

http://atlas360.net/home/samples/360/subject





Individual values

Definition

Can work constructively and fluidly in stressful or unpredictable situations without losing

focus or direction.

Interpretation

A high score usually indicates that the leader is capable of leading his/her employees

through crises without stressing them unnecessarily.

C+

Good

Score: 3.5

Spread: 0.3 Gap to self: 0.4

Low - Your respondents agree on this Low - Your estimation is close to your respondents'

Details

Communication

xx compromises when necessary

xx expresses respect for the opinions and views of others

xx brings clarity to communication when something is unclear

xx makes presentations with confidence and gets his/her message across clearly

xx expresses his/her opinions clearly

xx listens to others to gain understanding

xx clearly expresses his/her requirements and expectations of me

xx is open and honest in his/her communication

Individual values






Definition

Promotes dialog and understanding through communication.

Interpretation

A high score usually indicates that the leader encourages an open and safe work

environment where knowledge-sharing and synergy thrive.

B

Very good

Score: 4.0


Low - Your respondents agree

on this

Medium - Your estimation deviates slightly from your

respondents'

Details

Decision-making

xx allocates resources optimally

xx is willing to modify his/her own decisions when appropriate

xx respects the decisions of others

xx considers alternative options

xx makes necessary decisions, even if they are unpopular

xx consults with relevant parties before making major decisions

xx clearly communicates his/her decisions to relevant parties

xx ensures that decisions are being executed

Individual values






Definition

Ability to make clear decisions based on a solid foundation and implement these

decisions.

Interpretation

A high score usually indicates that employees rarely find themselves unsure about what is

expected of them, and thus find it easier to perform their tasks.

C

Good

Score: 3.3



Details

Leadership

xx provides me with opportunities for growth and development

xx motivates me if I have an uninteresting task

xx provides me with tasks suitable to my professional level and experience

xx tells me if the quality of my work is unsatisfactory

xx continuously ensures that I know my goals

xx delegates tasks to the appropriate resources

xx allocates resources optimally

xx provides me with tasks, I find challenging

xx creates a motivating environment for goal-achievement

xx recruits talented employees

xx expresses his/her recognition when I do my work well






Individual values

Definition

Can guide, distribute work, and offer employees the opportunity to perform optimally.

Interpretation A high score usually leads to enterprising, independent and high-performing employees.

C+

Good

Score: 3.4



Details

Social and networking

xx asks for help when it is needed

xx gets along well with most people

xx respects and maintains deadlines, and other agreements

xx is able to negotiate acceptable solutions for all parties involved

xx openly and honestly offers knowledge and skills to help others

xx relates well to all people, regardless of their position within the organization

xx promotes new ways of collaboration through his/her network

xx actively seeks new contacts

xx introduces people to one another

xx establishes useful networks within the organization

xx is credible






Individual values

Definition

Can obtain support/collaborative companionship through binding relationships and

networks.

Interpretation

A high score indicates that the manager can easily create essential conditions to ensure

flow and quality in work execution.

A-

Excellent

Score: 4.2


Low - Your respondents agree

on this

Medium - Your estimation deviates slightly from your

respondents'

Details

Teamwork

xx gets along well with most people

xx engages me in dialogue xx is helpful

xx promotes new ways of collaboration through his/her network

xx supports others on the team

xx is credible

xx respects and maintains deadlines, and other agreements

xx listens to others to gain understanding






xx expresses respect for the opinions and views of others

xx understands and respects the role of other players on the team

xx knows and respects his/her role in team-based situations

xx brings valuable knowledge and skills to the team

Individual values

Definition

Can motivate employees/ team to achieve synergy through collaboration.

Interpretation

A high score usually indicates that the leader is able to create a stimulating work

environment for high-performing employees.

B-

Very good

Score: 3.8


Low - Your respondents agreeon this Medium - Your estimation deviates slightly from yourrespondents'

Details

Open-response questions

Individual values

Text-based answers to open questions. The answers have been given with a promise of

anonymity and it is not possible to see who have given the answer.

Areas of strength (1)

# Comments

1 Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.






Areas of improvement (2)

# Comments

1 Ut enim ad minim veniam.

2 Ut enim ad minim veniam. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.

Benchmark comparison

Individual values

Key figures compared to previous surveys based on the same questions.

Benchmark example 1 Benchmark example 2

Stress management 4.0 3.8

Communication 3.9 4.1

Decision-making 4.7 3.6

Leadership 4.0 4.1

Social and networking 4.2 4.1

Teamwork 4.3 4.0

Question breakdownShows all numeric questions.

Breakdown by question (Agree 1-5)

5-point classic Likert scale

Individual values

Click the column headers to sort the table

# Question Self

Line

Manager

1 xx motivates me if I have an uninteresting task 4.0 3.0

2 xx delegates tasks to the appropriate resources 4.0 3.0

3 xx makes necessary decisions, even if they are unpopular 4.0 4.0



# Question Self

Line

Manager

4 xx recruits talented employees 4.0 3.0

5 xx uses his/her emotions constructively in difficult situations 4.0 3.0

6 xx understands and respects the role of other players on the team 2.0 5.0

7 xx provides me with tasks, I find challenging 4.0 3.0

8 xx makes presentations with confidence and gets his/her message across

clearly

5.0 4.0

9 xx allocates resources optimally 3.0 4.0

10 xx promotes new ways of collaboration through his/her network 4.0 5.0

11 xx maintains a positive outlook at work 4.0 5.0

12 xx supports others on the team 3.0 5.0

13 xx expresses his/her opinions clearly 3.0 4.0

14 xx provides me with tasks suitable to my professional level and experience 5.0 3.0

15 xx considers alternative options 3.0 4.0

16 xx prioritizes assigned tasks under stress 4.0 3.0

17 xx reacts constructively to criticism 4.0 3.0

18 xx provides me with opportunities for growth and development 4.0 5.0

19 xx actively seeks new contacts 5.0 4.0

20 xx establishes useful networks within the organization 3.0 5.0 21 xx creates a motivating environment for goal-achievement 4.0 3.0

22 xx introduces people to one another 4.0 4.0

23 xx works productively in stressful environments 3.0 3.0

24 xx gets along well with most people 5.0 5.0

25 xx knows and respects his/her role in team-based situations 2.0 5.0

26 xx relates well to all people, regardless of their position within the

organization

3.0 5.0

27 xx maintains his/her focus in stressed situations 4.0 2.0 28 xx is good at spotting new opportunities 4.0 3.0

29 xx expresses respect for the opinions and views of others 3.0 5.0

31 xx listens to others to gain understanding 3.0 4.0

32 xx is willing to modify his/her own decisions when appropriate 5.0 4.0

33 xx respects the decisions of others 3.0 3.0



# Question Self

Line

Manager

34 xx consults with relevant parties before making major decisions 4.0 4.0

35 xx continuously ensures that I know my goals 4.0 3.0

36 xx tells me if the quality of my work is unsatisfactory 4.0 3.0

37 xx expresses his/her recognition when I do my work well 3.0 4.0

40 xx is helpful 3.0 5.0

44 xx clearly expresses his/her requirements and expectations of me 3.0 4.0

45 xx compromises when necessary 3.0 4.0

46 xx brings clarity to communication when something is unclear 3.0 4.0

47 xx is open and honest in his/her communication 3.0 4.0

48 xx clearly communicates his/her decisions to relevant parties 3.0 4.0 49 xx ensures that decisions are being executed 3.0 4.0

50 xx openly and honestly offers knowledge and skills to help others 2.0 5.0

51 xx asks for help when it is needed 3.0 5.0

52 xx is able to negotiate acceptable solutions for all parties involved 3.0 5.0

53 xx respects and maintains deadlines, and other agreements 3.0 5.0

54 xx is credible 3.0 5.0

55 xx brings valuable knowledge and skills to the team 3.0 5.0

Scale Description Values

Agree 1-5

Continuous

5-point classic Likert scale 5.0: Strongly agree

4.0: Agree

3.0: Neither agree nor

2.0: Disagree1.0: Strongly disagree

Breakdown by question (Month groups)

Months in groups ranging from less than 6 months to more than 6 years



Individual values

Click the column headers to sort the table

# Question Self Line Manager

56 How long have you been employed at your current company? 3 9

57 How long have you known xx? 18 36

58 How long have you worked with xx? 9 3

Scale Description

Month groupsContinuous

Months in groups ranging from less than 6 months to more than 6 years

360 atlas report

Documents