38.social relations

Upload: mollybgalvin

Post on 07-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    1/39

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    2/39

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    3/39

    Altruism iscommon in otherspecies wheneverthere are geneticties with otherconspecifics.

    The closer thelink, the morelikely altruisticbehavior will takeplace.

    "I would lay down my life for two

    brothers or eight cousins (J.B.S.

    Haldane)

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    4/39

    Altruism is

    commonly

    observed insocial

    animals.

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    5/39

    Current expla-

    nations of altruism

    stress the role

    played by empathyin cooperation and

    competition (de

    Waal, 2008).

    Empathy springsfrom our shared

    emotional systems.

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    6/39

    When observing a

    conspecific in

    distress, we

    undergo emotionalcontagion: we feel

    their pain.

    This activation of

    the emotionalsystems motivate

    us to act.

    (Lieberman & Eisenberger, 2009)

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    7/39

    Consolation is thereassurance providedby bystanders tocombatants in an

    aggressive incident. Research in

    chimpanzees showsthat bystanders

    contact victims ofaggression more thanthey contactaggressors.

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    8/39

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    9/39

    Warneken et al., 2009

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    10/39

    Warneken et al., 2009

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    11/39

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    12/39

    In 1964, K. Genovese was rapedand murdered while a numberof witnesses failed to act on herbehalf.

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    13/39

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    14/39

    In order to help out, we first need to be aware of

    the incident, interpret it as an emergency and

    assume responsibility.

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    15/39

    Given the number of bystanders who did

    not take action to prevent Genoveses

    murder, research was conducted to find out

    why it was that the witnesses did not help

    out.

    When part of a large group of people, each

    individual is less likely to help, assuming that

    somebody else will (diffusion ofresponsibility).

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    16/39

    Bystanderhelpfulness isgreater whenpeople are alone orbelieve to be theonly one who canhelp.

    As the number ofbystanders

    increases, thepercentage ofpeople willing tohelp decreases.

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    17/39

    Sometimes peoplewill not actassuming that therest of the crowdknows somethingthey dont (forexample, that theevent in front of

    them is lessimportant than itseems to be).

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    18/39

    We are more willing to help if

    The person appears to need help and seems to

    deserve it.

    The person is somehow similar to us (ingroup)

    We are not in a hurry

    We are in a good mood.

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    19/39

    Two people need

    to choose between

    cooperation or

    competition.Should you defect

    or cooperate?

    If both of you

    confess,

    punishment is

    steeper.

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    20/39

    Even if you have a

    deal with your

    partner not to talk,

    how can you be sure

    he wont confess?

    The only way to

    make sure the other

    side cooperates is tobe able to monitor

    their behavior.

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    21/39

    If the game is playedbetween two peoplewho will never meet,the logical move is to

    compete. Whichresults in both playersgaining zero dollars.

    If the game is playeda number of times,

    the two players havea chance toreciprocate.

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    22/39

    The most effective strategy in iterativeversions of the prisoners dilemma is tit fortat.

    In tit for tat, the player makes a cooperative

    move first and then simply mimics theresponse of the other player in subsequentiterations: if player 2 competes, player 1 willreciprocate by competing on the second

    move. If player 2 cooperates, player 1 willcooperate as well.

    Cooperation from both players ensurescontinued success in the long run.

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    23/39

    A B1- Each player gets 10 dollars

    The players do not meet face to face

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    24/39

    A B1- Each player gets 10 dollars

    2- Player A has the chance to

    transfer all or part of his

    money to player B

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    25/39

    A B1- Each player gets 10 dollars

    2- Player A has the chance to

    transfer all or part of his

    money to player B

    3- The amount transferred is

    doubled for player B

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    26/39

    A B1- Each player gets 10 dollars

    2- Player A has the chance to

    transfer all or part of his

    money to player B

    3- The amount transferred is

    doubled for player B

    4- Player B has now the

    chance of transferring up to

    10 dollars back to player A

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    27/39

    A B1- Each player gets 10 dollars

    2- Player A has the chance to

    transfer all or part of his

    money to player B

    3- The amount transferred is

    doubled for player B

    4- Player B has now the

    chance of transferring up to

    10 dollars back to player A

    5- That amount is doubled

    for player A, so both players

    end up with up to 20 dollars

    each

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    28/39

    A BBut what happens if B, after

    receiving the money transfer

    and doubling that amount,

    does not return any money

    back?

    Sucka!

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    29/39

    A BBut what happens if B, after

    receiving the money transfer

    and doubling that amount,

    does not return any money

    back?

    Player A becomes more likely

    to stop trusting other players

    and decrease the amount

    transferred either as player

    one or player two.

    Cheating spreads through the

    population.

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    30/39

    Unlike the trust game, transactions in real

    life are rarely anonymous.

    People act cooperatively because a good

    reputation fosters more and strongerrelationships.

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    31/39

    1- Four players are given20 dollars each

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    32/39

    1- Four players are

    given

    20 dollars each

    2- They get to

    contribute to a

    common pool any

    amount they wantwithout disclosing the

    quantity

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    33/39

    1- Four players are

    given

    20 dollars each

    2- They get to

    contribute to a

    common pool any

    amount they wantwithout disclosing the

    quantity

    3- The common

    pool amount is

    increased by 60%

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    34/39

    1- Four players are

    given

    20 dollars each

    2- They get to

    contribute to a

    common pool any

    amount they want

    3- The common

    pool amount is

    increased by 60%

    4- Everybody gets

    an equal share

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    35/39

    Under normal circumstances, people begin

    contributing less and less to the common pool.

    However, if the amount of the contributions is

    disclosed and people are given the chance to

    buy a way to punish other players, players willpay to punish the low contributors.

    Under these circumstances cooperation is much

    more likely.

    Societies with the greatest amount of altruism

    are also the ones with the greatest amounts of

    altruistic punishment.

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    36/39

    Observation ofsuffering incompetitors doesnot recruit pain

    pathways butreward networks!

    The speed withwhich we break

    into competinggroups is quitetroubling.

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    37/39

    Participants in an

    experiment were

    informed in pairs

    that there weretwo studies, one

    which sounded

    interesting and

    pleasant, theother difficult and

    painful.

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    38/39

    One of theparticipants was thengiven a coin andasked to go into the

    next room to flip itand decide who wouldtake part in each ofthe two studies.

    The results showed

    that 90% of thepeople who flippedthe coin, won thetoss.

  • 8/3/2019 38.Social Relations

    39/39

    However, when given the chance to let the

    experimenter flip the coin, most participants

    preferred that option.

    People will make sure that they are not putinto a position in which they may be tempted

    to cheat.