4 solutions
DESCRIPTION
Química cuanticaTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 4 Solutions](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081816/55cf8e2b550346703b8f42b2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Chem 6, 9 Section Spring 2002
1
Assignment 4 Solutions
1. The “red line” in the Balmer series is the photon that results when the H atom changesstate from n = 3 to n = 2. This photon has an energy
Ephot = E3 – E2 = –2.18 × 10–18 J
32 –
–2.18 × 10–18 J
22 = 3.03 × 10–19 J .
This is the energy that the electron in the box will gain when it absorbs the photon. Theelectron starts in its ground state (n = 1, where this n is the particle-in-a-box quantumnumber—the other n is the H atom principal quantum number), absorbs this energy, andends in n = 2. This energy change is related to the box length L through
∆E = h2
8meL2 22 – 12 or L = 3h2
8me∆E = 7.73 × 10–10 m = 7.73 Å .
2. Problem 77 makes it clear that the symmetry of the wavefunction ensures that theprobability of finding the particle between 0 and L/4 is 1/4, as the figure below emphasizes.
x/L
Ψ2 n = 2
The area under the red curve for Ψ2 over the interval 0 ≤ x ≤ L/4 (the green bar) is the sameas the area over L/4 ≤ x ≤ L/2 or L/2 ≤ x ≤ 3L/4 or 3L/4 ≤ x ≤ L. But for n = 1, thesymmetry changes:
x/L
Ψ2 n = 1
![Page 2: 4 Solutions](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081816/55cf8e2b550346703b8f42b2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Chem 6, 9 Section Spring 2002
2
Here, you can see at a glance that the area under Ψ2 from 0 to L/4 is much less than thearea from L/4 to L/2. Thus, the probability of finding the particle anywhere between 0 andL/4 is much less than the probability of finding it between L/4 and L/2. (Note however thatsymmetry can still be invoked here for some situations. The probability between 0 and L/4is the same as from 3L/4 to L, for instance.) The probability’s numerical value in this caseis given by the expression below (and I don’t expect you to know how to do this integraloff the top of your head!):
Probability = Ψ(x)2 dx0
L/4
= 2L
sin2 πxL
dx0
L/4
= π – 2
4π = 0.0908 .
3. First, we use the expression in Equation [15.22] to calculate the size of a hydrogenatom (Z = 1) in the 3d (n = 3, l = 2) state:
r nl =
n2a0Z
1 + 12
1 – l (l + 1)
n2 = 10.5 a0 .
Then we make a table of r nl values for various n and l values for He+ (Z = 2):
n l r nl /a0
1 0 0.752 0 3.002 1 2.503 0 6.753 1 6.253 2 5.254 0 12.004 1 11.504 2 10.504 3 9.005 0 18.755 1 18.255 2 17.255 3 15.755 4 13.75
This table shows that the n = 4, l = 2 (or 4d) He+ ion has the same average size as the Hatom in the 3d state. The He+ 4s and 4p states and all n > 4 states are larger than H 3d.Note as well that the average radius does not depend on the m quantum number.
4. First, let’s review the Zeff calculation. We know the Na first ionization energy: IE =8.23 × 10–19 J, and we measured the sodium D line wavelength in lab to be about λ = 590nm. This wavelength corresponds to a photon energy of
![Page 3: 4 Solutions](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081816/55cf8e2b550346703b8f42b2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Chem 6, 9 Section Spring 2002
3
Ephot = hcλ
= 3.37 × 10–19 J .
We can now construct the energy level diagram below for Na:
E = 0
E3p = –IE + Ephot
E3s = –IE
Ephot
n =
3p
3s
0 J
–4.95 × 10–19 J
–8.23 × 10–19 J
From the general expression for the energy of an atomic level in terms of an effectivenuclear charge:
En,l = – e4me
8ε02h2
Zeff,n,l
2
n2 = –2.18 × 10–18 J
Zeff,n,l2
n2
we can write an expression for Zeff:
Zeff,n,l = n2En,l
–2.18 × 10–18 J
Our level energies for these two n = 3 levels give
Zeff 3s = 32E3s
–2.18 × 10–18 J =
32(–8.32 × 10–19 J)
–2.18 × 10–18 J = 1.85
Zeff 3p = 32E3p
–2.18 × 10–18 J =
32(–4.95 × 10–19 J)
–2.18 × 10–18 J = 1.43
Now we can use Equation [15.25] to calculate average radii for these two orbitals:
![Page 4: 4 Solutions](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081816/55cf8e2b550346703b8f42b2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Chem 6, 9 Section Spring 2002
4
r nl =
n2a0Zeff
1 + 12
1 – l(l + 1)
n2
r 3s =
32a01.85
1 + 12
1 – 0(0 + 1)
32 = 7.30 a0
r 3p =
32a01.43
1 + 12
1 – 1(1 + 1)
32 = 8.74 a0
Now we can move on to Cs. The analogous transition in Cs involves n = 6 instead of n =3 levels. The Cs atom changes configuration from [Xe]6p1 to [Xe]6s1. The 873.5 nmphoton that is emitted in this change has an energy Ephot = 2.27 × 10–19 J, and with a6.24 × 10–19 J ionization energy, our energy level diagram looks like this:
E = 0
E6p = –IE + Ephot
E6s = –IE
Ephot
n =
6p
6s
0 J
–3.97 × 10–19 J
–6.24 × 10–19 J
Repeating the effective nuclear charge calculation (with n = 6) gives Zeff = 3.21 for the 6slevel and 2.56 for the 6p level.