4 th workshop, amsterdam, 23 - 25 april 2007 page 1 aspa-s&m in paris aspa-s&m in paris:...
TRANSCRIPT
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 1 ASPA-S&M in Paris
ASPA-S&M in Paris: CRISTAL PARIS and PALOMA results
Jean-Marc Loscos, DSNA
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 2 ASPA-S&M in Paris
CRISTAL PARIS Project
• EUROCONTROL CASCADE - DSNA Project– October 2005 – February 2007
Evaluation of the operational benefits of the introduction of ASPA-S&M for Paris Arrivals
– CDG & Orly– TMA & Terminal en-route sectors (E-TMA)– Phased approach with Fast-Time Simulations (FTS)
• Phase 1: Full equipage
• Phase 2: Partial equipage
• Use of the Fast Time Simulator OPAS/OPAS-TMA– Validated during several projects and studies in the past
The reports are available (on request).
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 3 ASPA-S&M in Paris
Traffic simulated with ASPA-S&M
Radar vectoring area
• Actual Paris environment– CDG: Two pairs of specialised
runways (North and South)– Orly: Two specialised runways– Paris ACC: Terminal sectors
feeding the IAFs towards CDG and Orly
• Westerly configuration• AMAN-like builds the sequence• Departures not simulated
– No impact on simulations
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 4 ASPA-S&M in Paris
Starting points of the ASPA-S&M procedure
No problem for OMAKO arrivals
Flows outside the sectors need a specific treatment
No problem for BALOD arrivals
Lacks room on LORTA/ANARU
More difficult than on BALOD and OMAKO but still ok
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 5 ASPA-S&M in Paris
Correlation between use of ASAS and traffic landed
Maximum use of ASAS = 55% of traffic, on OMAKO
Use of ASAS instructions
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Hour
Nu
mb
er o
f ai
rcra
ft
MERUE
ANARU
OMAKO
BALOD
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 6 ASPA-S&M in Paris
Operational benefits
• Gain in time / distance on the full day : 1h30 / 567 NM– Averaged on the day:
• No gain on BALOD• Very limited gain on OMAKO• 13s / 0.44NM per aircraft on the whole day won on ANARU• 16s / 1.3NM per aircraft on the whole day won on MERUE
• Orbits decreased from 48 to 30• 5 less runway inversions
– Traffic landing eased on the North CDG
• Gains can be important– Up to 20s / 2.1NM per aircraft on one hour for CDG
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 7 ASPA-S&M in Paris
Gains on Northern CDG
Average : ANARU dt=-13 s dD=-0,44NM MERUE dt=-16 s dD=-1,3NM
For a given aircraft, the gain can go up to 20NM/4mn
Gain in distance vs. reference (NM)
1 square represents one aircraft
Gain in time vs. reference (seconds)
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 8 ASPA-S&M in Paris
ASAS use in E-TMA• Simulations showed that there is enough space to perform
S&M in Paris E-TMA WITHOUT modifying existing airspace.– Note that there is still a difficulty for North-East arrivals.
• Delay sharing between E-TMA and TMA is a necessity for optimum use of the runway. This confirms the current AMAN use.
– Combined use of AMAN and ASAS brings benefits during peak hours. There is no benefit during low traffic but there is no need for ASAS either.
– The optimal strategy is traffic dependent and should be adapted dynamically improved AMAN characteristics such as synchronisation of IAF’s
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 9 ASPA-S&M in Paris
BALOD flow
OMAKO flow
Orly constraint
East constraint
Introduction of Merging points in TMA
Current situation With merging point (2 options shown)
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 10 ASPA-S&M in Paris
Holding legs and merging points for CDG North arrivals
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 11 ASPA-S&M in Paris
ASAS use in TMA• The simulations showed that it is possible to introduce
merging points in Paris TMA both for CDG North and CDG South.– Note that the positioning of CDG South merging point is
constrained by Orly arrivals.
• Delay sharing between E-TMA and TMA is a necessity for optimum use of the runway. confirmation of current AMAN use
• ASAS use in TMA brings benefits such as reduction of number of stacks and flight efficiency . – However, it is not possible to use ASAS when in stack. further
studies are required to manage ASAS-linked aircraft even when in stack.
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 12 ASPA-S&M in Paris
Operational scenarios for partial equipage
• All aircraft are ADS-B out capable.• It was decided to simulate between 40% and 100% of
ASAS-capable (ADS-B IN + ASPA-S&M qualified), using one beneficial scenario of the first step with full equipage for each configuration CDG North and CDG South.
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 13 ASPA-S&M in Paris
CDG North – partial equipage – time gain
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 14 ASPA-S&M in Paris
CDG South – partial equipage – time gain
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 15 ASPA-S&M in Paris
Conclusions on partial equipage• The minimum recommended rate of ASAS equipage would
have to be set at 70%. (and even at 75% or 80% for CDG South)– A lower equipage rate would negate the benefits brought by ASPA
S&M when compared to the current situation.
• In addition, for the rates of equipage above 70%, the effects of partial equipage are not important when compared to full ASAS equipage. It means that there is probably no need for a mandatory carriage for ASAS, assuming that 70% rate would be obtained on a voluntary basis.
• It is important to note that gains begin to fall to zero and even turn into losses below a rate of ASAS equipage of 70%.
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 16 ASPA-S&M in Paris
Example of CDG traffic
• 70% rate of equipage would be reached for CDG current traffic by equipping not only Air France (57% max) but all major airlines, airlines from rich countries, and equipping in these airlines Boeing, Airbus, Embraer and Bombardier aircraft.
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 17 ASPA-S&M in Paris
PALOMA Project
• PALOMA : Paris Arrivals, Local Operations Managed with ASAS
• Operational concept developed from past experience– Co-Space project (EEC)– Gate-To-Gate/WP3 activities (DSNA)– Actual Paris airspace
• Real-Time Simulations prepared in 2006 by DSNA• Exercises run in Dec06 at Athis-Mons with 12 ATCOs
The report should be available in Summer 07.
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 18 ASPA-S&M in Paris
Airspace constraints
• Actual Paris airspace →
• Current AMAN ↓
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 19 ASPA-S&M in Paris
Main points
• It was possible to correlate some results from PALOMA and CRISTAL PARIS (RTS and FTS).
• Positioning of merging points in TMA• Time spacing is useful and meaningful• The usability is indeed dependent of the traffic.
NO INTEREST IN LOW TRAFFIC.
• It was possible to address other topics such as:– Use of Data link for target selection and for monitoring– Reduction of number of instructions– Regularity
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 20 ASPA-S&M in Paris
Use of Data-link for Target selection
Communication modes for target selection - CDG APP
10
56
37
102
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
VHF INI or ITM
datalink ITM
datalink INI
datalink COOR INI
ATCOs’ point of view: data-link is essential for target selection.
Communication modes for target selection - Paris ACC
62
19
45
4
17
23
1112
3
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
RT AR UJ
Sectors
VHF TC
datalink TC
datalink PC
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 21 ASPA-S&M in Paris
ATC display with ASAS links
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 22 ASPA-S&M in Paris
Reduction of speed and heading instructions
When ASAS works, it works very well:
Important reduction of instructions when ASAS links are established.
Average number of speed and heading instructions - ITM
9,4
14,3
58,0
51,5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Speed Heading
Instructions
aver
age
nu
mb
er
With ASAS
Without ASAS
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 23 ASPA-S&M in Paris
Regularity: spacing between arrivalsInter-arrival spacing
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240
spacing (s)
nu
mb
er o
f a/
c
With ASAS Without ASAS
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 24 ASPA-S&M in Paris
Conclusions• ASPA-S&M could be implemented in Paris Airspace
– without affecting the existing airspace subject to a minimum equipage of 70% by airlines.
– ASPA-S&M works efficiently at peak hours and reduces the number of instructions in TMA with an increase of the regularity. Gains can be 20s / 2.1NM per aircraft on one hour for CDG
– It is not easy to implement in particular in TMA because of the positioning of merging points to support the procedure.
– The relative spacing values at each IAF is also difficult to optimize since it varies with the traffic and the peak hours.
– Controllers still express doubts on the usefulness even if the use of data link was seen as a facilitator for acceptability.
4th
Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 - 25 April 2007
page 25 ASPA-S&M in Paris