5 urban models

21
Ebenezer Howard’s Three Magnets 1898 Contrasting rural and urban life. The possibility that the best of urban and rural could be incorporated on a “Garden City” eg Letchworth (1903) and Welwyn Garden City (1920). He actually planted a tree in every garden

Upload: ecumene

Post on 18-May-2015

25.748 views

Category:

Technology


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 5 Urban Models

Ebenezer Howard’s

Three Magnets 1898

Contrasting rural and urban life. The possibility that the best of urban and rural could be incorporated on a “Garden City”

eg Letchworth (1903) and Welwyn Garden City (1920). He actually planted a tree in every garden in WGC.

Page 2: 5 Urban Models

Ebenezer Howard ‘Garden Cities of To-morrow’ in 1902.Influenced the later strategy of building new towns in the UK, US, Canada, Argentina, Israel and Germany.As with most instances of social engineering, the garden city movement didn’t quite achieve what it set out to do. Its laudable motives and egalitarian vision contrast with the often depressing artificiality of ‘garden cities’, and the fact that they merely function as dormitories to the larger cities they so often adjoin.

Page 3: 5 Urban Models

Bid Rent Theory(Alonso 1964)

Bid rent/land rent theory shows how much different sectors of the economy are prepared to pay for land. Basic assumption is that accessibility is increased with centrality and therefore retailing is prepared to pay a high price for land in the CBD. As distance from the CBD increases availability of land increases and it is affordable for residential and even agricultural use.

Page 4: 5 Urban Models

A – CBDB – Commerce / industryC – residential high– medium densityD – sub-centresE – Suburbia

Variations to bid-rent theory

rent

A B C D E

Page 5: 5 Urban Models

Land use value for activity sector according to the distance from the CBD

Distance from the centre

Lan

d u

se v

alu

e

Retail

Residential (several components families)

Residential (single families)

Peaks due to transport intersections

Page 6: 5 Urban Models

IV – working class area

V – residential area

VI – suburban area

I - Loop (downtown; CBD)

II – industries

III – transition area

LOOP

Little

Sicily

Apartment Houses

BungalowSection

Single Fam

ily D

wellings

Residential District

Ghetto

Two PlanArea

Second Im

migrant

Settlem

ent

Model Chicago, years ‘20

Bla

ck B

elt

Bugess’ model of land use

Page 7: 5 Urban Models

Commuter zone

Residential zone

Working class zoneZone of transitionFactory zoneCBD

Page 8: 5 Urban Models

Core Frame Model – CBD Morphology

Page 9: 5 Urban Models

2

3

4

4

5

3

3

1

3

3

3

1 CBD2 Wholesale and light manufacturing3 Low-class residential4 Middle-class residential5 High-class residential

12

3

4 53

3

6

7

89

6 Heavy manufacturing7 Sub business district8 Residential suburb9 Industrial suburb

Sector Multi centres

Models: ‘sectors’ (Hoyt) and ‘multi centres’ (Harris and Ullman)

2

Page 10: 5 Urban Models

Mann’s concentric circles and

sector model

Page 11: 5 Urban Models

Classic industrial city 1850sKonx and Pinch 2000 – Urban Social Geography

Page 12: 5 Urban Models

Industrial city 1945-1975

Page 13: 5 Urban Models

The post-industrial city

Page 14: 5 Urban Models

MURDIE, R. A. (1969): Factorial ecology of metropolitan Toronto, 1951-1961

Cities have a very complex morphology combining physical and social space

A city’s morphology can be seen as a pizza with layers of toppings creating a complex and seemingly random morphology.

Ecological Land use model

Page 15: 5 Urban Models

Kearsley’s model includes contemporary urban processes and changes such as gentrification, commuter villages, development projects.

Page 16: 5 Urban Models
Page 17: 5 Urban Models

Family Life cycles and movement within a city

Page 18: 5 Urban Models

Low income life cycle model

Page 19: 5 Urban Models

Middle income life cycle model

Page 20: 5 Urban Models

Changing housing tenure in the UK

Page 21: 5 Urban Models

Urban densities and private transport