5.1. introduction - shodhgangashodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/5087/13/13_chapter...
TRANSCRIPT
72
5.1. INTRODUCTION At present naturally occurring phytochemicals are of major scientific
interest. Technically, the term ‘‘phytochemicals’’ refers to every naturally occurring
chemical substance present in plants, especially to those that are biologically active
(Caragay, 1992) .They occur in small amounts in all groups of plants and in all parts
of plants- woods, barks, stems, pods, leaves, fruits, roots, flowers, pollens and seeds
(Pratt and Hudson, 1990; Pratt et al., 1992; Macias et al., 2007).
All living organisms are composed of chemical substances from both the
inorganic and organic world that appear in roughly the same proportions, and
performs the same general tasks. Hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, carbon, phosphorus,
and sulfur form normally a major portion of all the living cells. The primary
metabolic routes use these compounds and produce primary metabolites. The
primary metabolites are present almost everywhere in nature and are essential for all
life forms. The primary metabolites include the common carbohydrates, fats,
proteins and nucleic acids that are needed to procreate and maintain life. Typically
they are involved in the energy regulation of organisms, growth and development of
tissues. In short, they are the building blocks of the organisms. (Salisbury and Ross,
1974; Taiz and Zeiger, 2003; Ari Tolenen, 2003). According to Mallette et al
(1960) the chemical constituents present in the plants can be considered from the
standpoint of utility to the cell, viz. structural materials, food reserves, metabolic
machinery, incidental and special substances.
5.1.1. Structural chemicals
The organic biomolecules are initially utilized in the synthesis of a small
number of building blocks that are, in turn, used in the construction of a vast array of
vital macromolecules. Some of these materials are providing rigid structure to the
cells and organisms. In the young cells the quantity of structural materials is very
low. On the other hand, in the matured cells the walls are so thick as to leave small
cavities within the cells. Such cells frequently die and then serve only in supporting
and protecting the softer tissues. The polysaccharides constitute approximately 75
percent of the dry weight of higher plants for example cellulose, hemi cellulose,
pectin, gum arabic, gum tragacanth, mucilage, and lignin. Most of these
polysaccharides are components of cell wall. Once formed, the structural materials
are quite inert when considered from the metabolic standpoint (Mallete et al., 1960).
73
5.1.2. Food reserves
Plants prepare their own food (e.g. photosynthetic process), which serve as
reserves during the periods of surplus synthesis. This will be stored as
carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins. These reserves are stored (1) in the active cells
as amyloplasts and oil vacuoles, (2) in special storage organs for the purpose of
providing new vegetative growth (tuber, bulb, etc.) or, (3) in the fruit and seed for
the next generation (Mallete et al., 1960).
5.1.2.1. Carbohydrate
A carbohydrate is an organic compound with the general formula Cn (H2O) n
i.e. consists only of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, with the last two in the 2:1
atomic ratio. The carbohydrates (saccharides) are classified into monosaccharide,
oligosaccharides, and polysaccharides.
The plant uses solar energy to oxidize water, releasing oxygen and reduce
carbon dioxide there by farming large carbon compounds, primarily sugars. This
complicated process can be summarized as.
CO2 + H2O (C6 H12 O6) n + O2
At the time of energy surplus these sugar molecules are polymerised and
stored as a reserve material. Carbohydrates serve various functions in a living cell;
they transport energy and supply C to other metabolic pathways. Starch and sucrose
are the storage forms of reserve carbohydrates. In the major economically valuable
timber plants, which are commercially, exploited cellulose and hemicellulose are the
carbohydrate. A number of other carbohydrates (D-fructofuranose, fructosans, D-
galactose, D-mannose, D-galactopyranose, galactomannans etc. are found in a
variety of plants (Mallete et al., 1960; Salisbury and Ross, 1974; Taiz and Zeiger,
2003).
5.1.2.2. Lipids
The term lipids include a variety of organic compounds found in the plants.
In many cases the term is synonymous to the “ether extractable,” and includes the
triglycerides, phospholipids, and waxes as well as the non- fatty acid containing
substances, resins, resin acids, terpenes (essential oil), and plant sterols, which
possess diversified biological and commercial applications.
74
Lipids are classified into three main groups, namely, simple lipids,
compound lipids, and hydrolytic products of lipids or derived lipids. Simple lipids
are defined as organic esters which, upon hydrolysis, yield only aliphatic alcohols
and aliphatic monocarboxylic acids. Examples are fats and waxes. Upon hydrolysis,
compound lipids yield aliphatic alcohols, aliphatic monocarboxylic acids, and other
products such as carbohydrates, phosphoric acid, or nitrogen bases. Examples of this
group are the phospholipids and the glycolipids. The hydrolytic products of derived
lipids include the fatty acids, various alcohols, such as glycerols and the sterols, and
a number of nitrogenous compounds such as cholins or sphingosine (Mallete et al.,
1960; Salisbury and Ross, 1974; Taiz and Zeiger, 2003).
5.1.2. 3. Proteins
Proteins (also known as polypeptides) are organic compounds made of
amino acids arranged in a linear chain and folded into a globular form. The amino
acids in a polymer are joined together by the peptide bonds between the carboxyl
and amino groups of adjacent amino acid residues. The sequence of amino acids in a
protein is defined by the sequence of a gene, which is encoded in the genetic code
(Ridley, 2006).
In general, the genetic code specifies 20 standard amino acids; however, in
certain organisms the genetic code can include selenocysteine and pyrrolysine.
Shortly after or even during synthesis, the residues in a protein are often chemically
modified by post-translational modification, which alter the physical and chemical
properties, folding, stability, activity, and ultimately the functions of the proteins.
Proteins can also work together to achieve a particular function, and they often
associate to form stable complexes (Maton et al., 1993). Like other biological macromolecules such as polysaccharides and nucleic
acids, proteins are essential parts of organisms and participate in virtually every
process within the cells. Many proteins are enzymes that catalyze biochemical
reactions and are vital to metabolism. Proteins also have structural or mechanical
functions. Other proteins are important in cell signaling, immune responses, cell
adhesion, and the cell cycle. Proteins are also necessary as fodder; since animals
cannot synthesize all the amino acids they need and must obtain essential amino
acids from food. Through the process of digestion, animals break down ingested
75
protein into free amino acids that are then used in the metabolism (Taiz and Zeiger,
2003; Nelson, 2005).
Proteins from different vegetable sources are so similar in chemical
composition that they are used interchangeably for many industrial purposes. Ease
of isolation and cost of the starting material are the determining factors. The most
important industrial uses of proteins are for the production of plastics and adhesives,
in coatings for the paper products, and in bonding ply wood veneers. Artificial
textile fibers can be prepared from vegetable proteins (Mallete et al., 1960;
Salisbury and Ross, 1974)
5.1.3. Metabolic machinery and cofactors
Associated with the reserve proteins in the seed, and widely distributed
throughout the remainder of the plant, are the proteins which serve to catalyze the
multitude of reactions involved in the complicated process termed metabolism.
Enzymatic proteins require the assistance of large numbers of cofactors in the
performance of their roles as catalysts. Included in this class are the inorganic
elements (macro and micro elements), vitamins, nucleotides, and the plant growth
regulators (Mallete et al., 1960).
5.1.4. Incidental substances
In addition to the above mentioned, essential elements, the plant absorbs
many of the diverse inorganic ions found in the soil (ex. selenium, mercury,
cadmium, arsenic, lead, cobalt, etc.). Plants grown in soils containing appreciable
quantities of these and similar elements accumulate measurable amounts. In most
cases such absorption is inconsequential, both to the plant and to the animal which
consumes it; however, selenium being a well-known exception (Mallete et al.,
1960).
76
5.1.5. The special substances
The special substances are the substances which are produced by the plants.
Plants produce a large, diverse array of organic compounds that appear to have no
direct function in the growth and development. These substances are known as
secondary metabolites, secondary products, or natural products. Secondary
metabolites have no generally recognized, direct role in the process of
photosynthesis, respiration, solute translocation, protein synthesis, nutrient
assimilation, differentiation, or the formation of carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids.
But their roles as plant protectants and chemical reservoir have been later on brought
to light (Harborne, 1993). Secondary metabolites also differ from primary
metabolites in having a restricted distribution in the plant kingdom. That is,
particular secondary metabolites are often found in only one plant species or related
group of species, whereas primary metabolites are found throughout the plant
kingdom (Mallete et al., 1960).
5.1.6. Factors affecting the chemical composition
The evolutionary history of the plant kingdom is a story of constant
adaptations to the changing environmental conditions. Plants, as sedentary
organisms, have to adjust to the surrounding environment during their life cycle
(Harborne, 1993; Ferni., 2007).
Plants have adapted by modifying morphological and anatomical features,
through physiological variation or by biochemical means. Biochemical adaptation
may involve both basic / primary metabolism and special/ secondary metabolism
(Harborne, 1993). This renders metabolic responses to stress and to interactions with
its environment primordial features (Pichersky et al., 2006; Goff and Klee, 2006;
Kappers et al., 2005). To meet such demands it has been estimated that the plant
kingdom contains upwards of 200,000 metabolites (De Luca and St Pierre, 2000)
with values for a single species being given in the order of 15,000 (Dixon, 2001;
Hartmann et al., 2005).
In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the ways the plants are
biochemically adapted to their differing environments. Many studies have been
conducted by biochemists world over to explore the biochemical adaptation of the
plants at various environmental variables like seasonal effects, drought, frost,
77
salinity, mineral nutrients, heavy metal toxicity, altitude, various soil textures,
radiation, etc. The biotic variations such as age of the plant, microbial attack,
grazing, competition, and individual nutritional status, have been proven to have an
impact on the secondary metabolite profile in higher plants (Harborne, 1982).
Among the studies on the impact of abiotic factors over the secondary plant
products the contribution of the following phytochemists are noteworthy: Korner,
(1999); Spitaler, (2006), Owuor et al., (2008) have proved the altitudinal impacts on
plant materials. Krishnan et al., (2000) and Chen et al., (2009) implicated seasonal
changes along with altitudinal variations. The seasonal and climatic variations have
been strongly witnessed by many scientists (Adam, 1970; Kramer and Kozlowski,
1979; Bonicel et al., 1987; Ashworth et al., 1993; Rinne et al., 1994; Zidorn and
Stuppner, 2001; Barbarox and Breda, 2002; Bhowmik and Matsui, 2003; Geography
and climate- Namdeo et al., 2010).
The impact of seasonal and locational influences on the metabolites of a
popular native curative plant Calotropis has so far not been reported.
5.2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
5.2.1. Plant material collection for the seasonal and locational studies
The collection of plant materials is identical to what has been described in
the previous Chapter (2.4).
5.2.2. Drying of plant materials
This process is done to ensure good keeping qualities and suppress the
action of enzymes on the sampled plants. The collected plant materials were washed
thoroughly to remove the dirt and other contaminations. Then the collected leaves
were dried carefully under shade, at room temperature so as to retain their fresh
green colour, and also to prevent decomposition of active compounds. The dried
leaves were powdered using a stone grinder. The powdered materials are henceforth
termed as crude drugs. Crude drugs were stored in airtight, dark, glass container.
78
5.2.3. Phytochemical analysis
The crude drugs were used to perform the following analyses:-
Table 5.1. Phytochemical analysis
S.No. Parameters Extraction / analytical method References
1. Organic Carbon Volumetric method Walkley and Black, 1934
2. Total Carbohydrate Hydrolysed by 2.5 N HCl – Anthrone method - colorimetry
Hedge and Hofreiter,1962
3. Total Protein Buffer Extract- Lowrys method - colorimetry
Lowry et al., 1951; Mattoo,1970
4. Total Lipid Soxhlet method - gravimetry Folch et al 1957
5. Calorific value
(Carbohydrate x 4.15)+ (Fat x 9.4) +(Protein x 5.65) Phillips, 1969
6. Ash content Dry ash – gravimetry Renaud et al., 1994.
7. Total Nitrogen Micro-Kjeldahl method - Titrimetry
Pellettand young,1980; Thenmoli Balasubramanian and Sadasivam,1987
8. Total Phosphorous Triple acid digestion-colorimetry (Spectronic 20 at 540 nm +)
Jackson,1973
9 Total Potassium, Triple acid digestion-Flame photometry (ELICO-361) Jackson,1973
10
Calcium, magnesium, zinc, copper, iron, manganese, ,boron, molybdenum, chromium, nickel, cadmium, lead, cobalt, mercury, arsenic, cyanide, Selenium and silver
Triple acid Digestion -AA Spectrophotometry (Varion 200AA)
Baker and Suhr, 1982; Allen ,1989
5.2.4. Elemental analysis
Two grams of ash were digested with mixture of nitric acid, sulphuric acid,
and perchloric acid in the ratio 11:6:3, for 24 hours to remove the organic matters.
The digested sample was made up to 100 ml and used for the assay of the trace
elements through Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS- Varion 200AA)
using suitable hollow-cathode lamps. Appropriate working standard was prepared
for each element. All elements were determined through this procedure. A blank
reading was also obtained.
79
5.2.5. Extraction and GC-MS analysis
The crude drug was subjected to extraction with analytical grade solvent of
chloroform for GC-MS analysis. 25 g of the crude drug was taken in a round bottom
flask and 50ml of analytical grade chloroform was added and refluxed for 8 hrs.
After completion of the 8hrs the round bottom flask was cooled and the extract was
filtered through the Buchner funnel. The extract was evaporated to dryness under
nitrogen atmosphere using turbo evaporator. The residue obtained was dissolved in
2ml chloroform and transferred into the GC vial and injected into the GC-MS port.
GC–MS analysis was performed on an Agilent gas chromatograph model
6890 N coupled to an Agilent 5973 N mass selective detector. Analytes were
separated on an HP-5MS capillary column (30 m X 0.25 mm X 1.0 μl) by applying
the following temperature program: 40 °C for 5 min, 40–70 °C at 2 °C /min, 70°C
for 2 min, 70–120 °C at 3 °C /min, 120–150 °C at 5 °C /min, 150–220 °C at 10°C
/min and then 220 °C for 2 min. Transfer line temperature was 280 °C . Mass
detector conditions were: electronic impact (EI) mode at 70 eV; source temperature:
230 °C; scanning rate 2.88 scan S-1; mass scanning range: m/z 29–540. Carrier gas
was helium at 1.0 ml min-1. The tentative identification of volatile components was
achieved by comparing the mass spectra with the data system library (NIST 98) and
other published spectra (Mass Spectrometry Data Centre., 1974), supported by
retention index data, which were compared with available literature retention indices
(NIST Chemistry Web Book, 2005). All compounds were quantified as 3-octanol
equivalents.
5.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
5.3.1. Seasonal variations
5.3.1.1 Seasonal variations in the organic compounds
5.3.1.1.1 Organic carbon
Organic carbon is one of the most stable elements of plant biomass. The
present observation shows that the organic carbon differs significantly between
seasons (Figure 5.1 and Table 5.2a). In the southwest monsoon season (S4) the plant
80
25.4 25.6
24.8
27.5
23
23.5
24
24.5
25
25.5
26
26.5
27
27.5
Org
anic
car
bon
( %)
S1 S2 S3 S4
sample possesses the highest organic carbon (27.5%) and in the summer season (S3)
the lowest (24.8%).
Though significant the current study recorded a little variation in the organic
carbon. The difference between the highest and lowest values is only 2.7%. The
organic carbon shows a positive relationship only with the highest R.H.and the
nitrogen (Table 5.2b and 5.2c).
Figure 5.1. Organic Carbon in the plant – seasonal study
Table 5.2a. Seasonal variations in organic carbon
(One sample t - test)
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical
Inference
Organic Carbon (%) 4 25.825 1.1673 44.24
9 P<0.01 significant
DF = 3
Table 5.2b. Karl Pearson correlation between season and organic carbon
Organic carbon vs. Correlation value Statistical inference
Highest R.H. morning -.957* P<0.05 Significant
N= 4
Table 5.2c. Karl Pearson correlation between soil and organic carbon
Organic carbon vs.. Correlation value Statistical inference Total Nitrogen -.959* P<0.05 Significant
N= 4
81
The current global stock of soil organic carbon is estimated to be 1,500–
1,550 Pg (Batjes, 1996; Post, 2001; and Lal, 2004). This constituent of the terrestrial
carbon stock is twice as that of the earth’s atmosphere (720 Pg), and more than triple
the stock of organic carbon in terrestrial vegetation (560 Pg) (Bolin, 1970; Baes et
al., 1977).
Baties and Sombroek, (1997) reported the quantity of C stored in soils to be
about three times more than the vegetation and twice as much as that which is
present in the atmosphere (Batjes and Sombroek, 1997). But, in the case of
Calotropis the amount of organic carbon is higher than of the soil (Chapter 4.3.4).
Brogowski, et. al., (2002) observed a significant loss in the carbon content
during the winter in crop plants. This was related to the weight loss of the crop.
5.3.1.1.2. Seasonal variations in the carbohydrate, protein and lipid
The variations in the quantity of primary metabolites (carbohydrate, protein
and lipid) among seasons are statistically significant (figure 5.2 and Table 5.3a). The
carbohydrate, protein and lipids are slightly higher in southwest monsoon and lower
in summer. The average contents of carbohydrate is between 9.3% (L3) to 10.2%
(L4); the protein is between 5.3 % (L3) to 6.2 % (L4) and the lipid is 2.7 % (L2) to 3
%( L4).
The correlation analysis expresses a significant positive relation of protein
with the highest R.H. morning and evening and lipids with the lowest R.H. evening.
Highest R.H. morning is related to the protein and the lowest R.H. evening is
significantly correlating with the lipids (Table 5.3b). This suggests that the R.H is
the main factor which highly influences the primary metabolism than the other
meteorological parameters. Among the soil components, nitrogen is correlated with
the protein, the potassium is linked with the lipid and the sodium is connected with
the carbohydrate and lipids (Table 5.3c).
82
9.7 9.89.3
10.2
5.5 5.4 5.36.2
2.9 2.7 2.8 3
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 2 3 4
( % )
TotalCarbohydrate
TotalProteins
Total Lipids
Figure 5.2. Carbohydrate, protein and lipid in the plants (seasonal study)
Table 5. 3a.Variations in the Carbohydrate, protein and lipids
(One sample t - test)
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical Inference
Carbohydrate 4 9.75
0.369 52.748 P<0.01 significant
Protein 4 5.6
0.408 27.434 P<0.01 significant
Lipid 4 2.85 0.1291 44.152 P<0.01 significant
DF = 3
In the earlier studies contents of the carbohydrates were found to vary
between the summer and winter samples. Yoo et al. (1996) found the seasonal
variations in carbohydrate, (starch and other soluble sugars) in the White forsythia.
Carbohydrate loss in winter was integrated with the nucleic acids, and the
physiological processes (Brogowski, 2002).
Arbutus unedo and Olea europaea contained higher amounts of total lipids at
the beginning of the growing season (Christou et al., 1994). Similarly the current
observations of these compounds show significant increase in the southwest
monsoon and decrease in summer. This decrease may be, to maintain the
physiological processes.
83
Table 5.3b. Karl Pearson correlation between meteorological elements and the
seasonal variation in the Carbohydrates, Proteins and Lipids
Correlation value Statistical inference Parameter
Carbohydrate Protein Lipid Carbohydrate Protein Lipid
Highest R.H. morning
-0.812
-.980*
-.775
P>0.05 N.S.
P<0.05 Significant
P>0.05 N.S.
Highest R.H. evening
-0.755
-.960*
-.721
P>0.05 N.S
P<0.05 Significant
P>0.05 N.S
Lowest R.H. evening
0.855
.837
.993**
P>0.05 N.S
P>0.05 N.S
P<0.01 Significant
Mean Wind Speed
0.785
.983*
.835
P>0.05 N.S.
P<0.05 Significant.
P>0.05 N.S.
N=4; N.S= Not significant
Table 5.3c. Karl Pearson correlation between soil parameters and the seasonal
variation in the Carbohydrates, Proteins and Lipids
Correlation value Statistical inference Parameter Carbohyd
rate Protein Lipid Carbohydrate Protein Lipid
Total nitrogen -.899 -.986* -.949 P>0.05 N.S.
P<0.05 Significant
P>0.05 N.S.
Potassium -.775 -.854 -.964* P>0.05 N.S
P>0.05 N.S
P<0.05 Significant
Sodium -.953* -.902 -.992** P<0.05 Significant
P>0.05 N.S
P<0.01 Significant
N=4; N.S= Not significant
5.3.1.1.3. Seasonal variations in the energy value
Several publications deal with differences in caloric values of many species
from different sex classes, nutritional status and different stages of life history are
the main reasons for this variability of the energy contents (Wiegert and Hasler,
1965; Gyllenberg, 1969; wising, 1971; Benedetto Castro, 1975). In the higher plants,
there is a distinct dependence of caloric values up on the climatic conditions, the
availability of water and the concentration of dissolved salts in the soil (Malone,
1968; Caspers, 1975). Considerable variations of energy values between the
individual components of plant species have been reported by Runge (1971),
Larcher et al., (1973) and Caspers (1975). The endogenous, climate dependent
84
98.59
96.5694.86
105.56
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
104
106
108
S1 S2 S3 S4
(Kca
l /10
0g)
energy value was previously recorded in eight species of a meadow and an old-field
community (Caspers, 1977).
The seasonal variations in the energy potential of the plants are depicted in
figure 5.3. The highest energy potential (9.46 kcal.) was found in southwest
monsoon season and the lowest (8.36 kcal) in summer seasons. At the time of
adverse conditions the plant spends much of the energy to maintain the basic
metabolism (Brogowski et al., 2002). In the present study also the content of
carbohydrate, protein and lipids are significantly reducing at summer, which may be
due to the adaptive mechanism to escape from the dry-hot summer. As a result of
these metabolites, the energy contents are also coming down in summer. The
variation found is statistically significant (Table 5.4a).
Figure 5.3. Energy content in the plant (seasonal study)
Table 5.4a. Seasonal variations in the energy content
(One sample t - test)
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Significance
Calorific value 4 8.6600 .40620 42.639 P<0.01 significant
DF = 3
The calorie value of the plant is associated with the highest R.H. (morning
and evening) and wind speed (Table 5.4b) and the nitrogen content of the soil
(Table5.4c).
85
Table 5.4b. Karl Pearson correlation between season and calorie value
Calorie value vs. Correlation value Statistical inference
Highest R.H.morning -.985 P<0.05 Significant
Highest R.H. evening -.964 P<0.05 Significant.
Mean Wind Speed .968 P<0.05 Significant
N=4
Table 5.4c. Karl Pearson correlation between soil and Calorie value
Calorie value vs. Correlation value Statistical inference
Total nitrogen -.969* P<0.05 Significant
N=4
5.3.1.1.4. Seasonal variations in the yield of extract
The extract yield potential of the plant varies significantly from season to
season (Figures 5.4 and Table 5.5a). The southwest monsoon sample provided the
maximum quantity of the extract (6.95%) and the pre-summer sample yielded the
lowest amount (4.95%).
The yield of extracts is only connected with mean maximum temperature and
minimum temperature and mean R.H morning (Table 5.5b).
6.4
4.95
6.85 6.95
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
S1 S2 S3 S4
( % )
Figure 5.4. Yield of extracts in seasons
86
Table 5.5a Seasonal variations in the yield of extract
(One sample t - test)
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Significance
Yield of Extract 4 6.288 .9232 13.621 P<0.01 significant DF = 3
Table 5.5b. Karl Pearson correlation between season and yield of extract
Yield of extract vs. Correlation value Statistical inference
Mean Max Temperature 969* P<0.05 Significant Mean Minimum Temperature .991** P<0.01Significant Highest Temperature .968* P<0.05Significant Mean R.H. morning -.958* P<0.05Significant
N= 4
5.3.1.1.5. Compounds present in the chloroform extract
The analysis of the organic compounds present in the chloroform extract of
Calotropis through GC-MS revealed the presence of 64 compounds. Out of these the
summer sample seems to possess the maximum number of compounds (50) (Figure
5.5, 5.5a and Table 5.5, 5.6a). As per the numbers of the compounds synthesized,
the ascending order of the seasons is as follows:
Pre- summer, northeast monsoon, southwest monsoon and summer
(S2 - 35) < (S1 - 37) < (S4 - 40) < (S3 - 50).
The variation observed in the number of compounds is statistically
significant (Table 5.6b.).
Out of the 64 compounds, 24 show statistically significant seasonal
variations (1.Tetradecane 2. Hexadecane 3. Bicyclo[3.1.1]heptane,2,6,6-trimethyl-
,(1alpha,2alpha,5alpha) 4. 9-Octadecyne 5. n-Hexadecanoic acid 6. Phytol 7. 9, 12,
15-Octadecatrienoic acid,(Z,Z,Z)- 8. 9-Octadecenamide,(Z)- 9. Heptacosane 10. 13-
Docosenamide,(Z)- 11. Squalene 12. Nonacosane 13. Heptacosane,1-chloro- 14.
Tricosane 15. Vitamin E 16. Campesterol 17. Stigmasterol 18. Alpha-Amyrin 19.
4,4,6a,6b,8a,11,12,14b-Octamethyl-1,4,4a,5,6,6a,6b,7,8,8a,9,10,11,12,12a,14,14a,
14b-octadecahydro-2H-picen-3-one 20. .alpha-Amyrin 21. 12-Oleanen-3-yl acetate,
(3alpha) - 22. 9, 19-Cyclolanost-24-en-3-ol, acetate 23. Urs-12-en-24-oic acid, 3-
oxo-, methyl ester, (+) - 24. Taraxasterol) (Table 5.6c).
87
The correlation analysis shows the numbers of compounds are associated
only with the soil (Table 5.6d).
37 35
50
40
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
S1 S2 S3 S4
Num
ber o
f com
poun
ds
Figure 5.5. Number of compounds identified in seasons
88
S1 (Northeast monsoon) S2 (Pre-Summer)
S3 (Summer) S4 (Southwest monsoon)
Figure 5.5a. GC - MS Chromatogram - seasonal samples
89
Table 5.6a. The composition of chloroform extract of Calotropis through GC-MS
in seasons
S.No. Rt. Compound name S1 S2 S3 S4
1 7.9 Dodecane - 0.28 0.29 0.14 2 9.1 2-Methoxy-4-vinyl phenol 0.35 - 0.11 - 3 9.7 Tetradecane 0.41 0.16 0.15 0.21 4 10.7 phenol, 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl) 0.24 0.12 0.11 -
5 11.1 2(4H)-Benzofuranone,5,6,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl- 0.08 - 0.06 -
6 11.5 Hexadecane 0.21 0.15 0.24 7 12.7 Tridecanoic acid, 12-methyl-methylester - - 0.14 - 8 13.1 Tetradecanoic acid 0.48 - 0.39 - 9 13.5 5-Ethylcyclopent-1-enecarboxaldehyde - - - 0.23
10 13.8 Bicyclo[3.1.1]heptane,2,6,6-trimethyl-,(1alpha,2alpha,5alpha) 0.53 0.52 0.25 0.28
11 14.2 9-Octadecyne 0.23 0.15 0.15 0.28 12 14.8 Hexadecanoic acid,methyl ester 0.17 0.19 1.3 - 13 15.3 n-Hexadecanoic acid 9.68 6.33 4.33 2.68 14 16.7 9-Octadecanoic acid,methylester,(E)- - - 0.73 - 15 16.8 Phytol 1.11 1.05 0.76 0.56 16 17 Octadecanoic acid,methyl ester - - 0.46 - 17 17.3 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid,(Z,Z,Z)- 3.3 2.36 2.05 0.55 18 17.5 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid(z,z)- 0.91 - - - 19 17.7 Dodecanamide 0.53 0.53 - 0.34 20 17.8 Hexadecanamide - - 0.37 - 21 19.2 Octacosane - - 1.19 -
22 19.5 A'-Neogammacer-22(29)-en-3-ol,acetate,(3beta,21beta)- - 1.39 - 1.55
23 20 9-Octadecenamide,(Z)- 4.42 2.51 2.47 3.99 24 20.4 Urs-20-en-3-ol,(3alpha,18alpha,19alpha)- - - - 1.09 25 20.6 Lup-20(29)-en-3-ol, acetate,(3beta)- - 2.57 1.57 2.1 26 21.6 Hop-22(29)-en-3alpha-ol - 14.19 7.29 9.67
27 22.3 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, mono(2-ethylhexyl)ester 0.37 - - -
28 23.2 Nonadecane,1-chloro- - - 0.71 - 29 23.6 Ergost-22-en-3-0l,(3alpha,5alpha,22E,24R)- - - 0.32 - 30 23.7 Stigmastane-3,6-dione,(5alpha) - 1.29 - - 31 24.2 Z-12-Pentacosene - - 0.08 - 32 24.6 Heptacosane 0.26 0.16 0.37 0.17 33 25 Tetracosanoic acid,methyl ester - - 0.07 - 34 25.6 13-Docosenamide,(Z)- 0.23 0.19 0.12 0.14 35 26 Squalene 1.76 0.89 1.84 0.97 36 26.9 Z-14-Nonacosane - - 1.16 1.84 37 27.2 Nonacosane 1.97 1.21 1.53 1.88
38 27.4 Tricyclo[4.3.0.0(7,9)]nonane, 2,2,5,5,8,8-hexamethyl-,(1alpha,6beta, 7alpha,9alpha)- 0.14 0.16 0.43 1.49
39 27.6 Bicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene, 3,7-dimethyl-7-(4-methyl-3- - - 0.92 -
90
pentenyl)-8-(2,6,10-trimethyl-1,5,9-undecatrienyl)-,[1alpha,6alpha,7alpha,8alpha(1E,5E)]-
40 28.1 2,6,10,14,18,22-tetracosahexanone,2,6,10,15,9,23-hexamethyl-,(all-E)- - - - 0.89
41 28.6 Heptacosane,1-chloro- 0.67 0.5 0.61 0.37 42 29.4 gamma-Tocopherol 0.25 - 0.26 - 43 30 17-Pentatriacontene - - 0.23 - 44 30.4 Tricosane 8.52 4.84 6.27 5.17 45 30.8 Vitamin E 1.15 3.86 3.85 1.47
46 31 2(1H)Naphthalenone,3,5,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-4,8a-dimethyl-6-(1-methylethenyl)- - - - 3.25
47 31.2 Desmosterol - - 0.2 - 48 32.6 Campesterol 1.7 2.06 2.57 1.57 49 33.2 Stigmasterol 1.21 1.1 1.73 1.09
50 34.1 Ergost-8,24(28)-dien-3-ol,4,14-dimethyl-,(3alpha,4alpha,5.alpa.,)- 0.26 - 0.42 0.59
51 34.7 Stigmasterol,22,23-dihydro- 3.59 3.56 - 1.7 52 34.8 gamma-Sitosterol - - 3.86 - 53 34.9 Heneicosane,11-decyl- - - - 0.89
54 35.1 Pyridine-3-Carboxamide,oxime,N-(2-trifluromethyl phenyl)- - - - 2.53
56 35.2 Stigmasta-5,24(28)-dien-3-ol,(3alpha,24Z)- - - 2.04 - 57 35.7 alpha-Amyrin 5.76 4.07 4.02 4.2
58 36 4,4,6a,6b,8a,11,12,14b-Octamethyl-1,4,4a,5,6,6a,6b,7,8,8a,9,10,11,12,12a,14,14a,14b-octadecahydro-2H-picen-3-one
1.36 1.45 0.63 0.98
59 36.5 4,22-Stigmastadiene-3-one 1.69 0.89 - 1.68 60 37 .alpha-Amyrin 8.42 6.04 13.35 13.67 61 38.4 12-Oleanen-3-yl acetate, (3alpha)- 16.9 12.44 9.58 10.16 62 38.7 9,19-Cyclolanost-24-en-3-ol,acetate 3.12 2.23 1.88 1.98 63 39.9 Urs-12-en-24-oic acid, 3-oxo-,methyl ester,(+)- 13.6 15.5 13.03 15.11 64 40.2 Taraxasterol 4.16 5 3.6 2.3
Table 5.6b. Number of compounds identified in seasons through GC-MS
(One sample t - test)
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Significance
Total Number of compounds 4 40.50 6.658 12.165 P<0.01
significant DF= 3
91
Table 5.6c. Seasonal variation in the composition of chloroform extract
(One sample t - test)
S.No. Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Significance
1 Tetradecane 4 .2325 .12121 3.836 P<0.05 significant
2 Hexadecane 4 .2675 .14009 3.819 P<0.05 significant.
3 Bicyclo[3.1.1]heptane,2,6,6-trimethyl-,(1alpha,2alpha,5alpha)
4 .3950 .15067 5.243 P<0.05 significant
4 n-Hexadecanoic acid 4 5.7550 3.01234 3.821 P<0.05 significant
5 Phytol 4 .8700 .25703 6.770 P<0.01 significant
6 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid,(Z,Z,Z)- 4 2.065 1.1413 3.619 P<0.05
significant
7 Heptacosane 4 .2400 .09764 4.916 P<0.05 significant
8 13-Docosenamide,(Z)- 4 .1700 .04967 6.846 P<0.01 significant
9 Squalene 4 1.3650 .50441 5.412 P<0.05 significant
10 Nonacosane 4 1.6475 .34798 9.469 P<0.01 significant
11 Heptacosane,1-chloro 4 .5375 .13200 8.144 P<0.01 significant
12 Tricosane 4 6.2000 1.66311 7.456 P<0.01 significant
13 Vitamin E 4 2.5825 1.47516 3.501 P<0.05 significant
14 Campesterol 4 1.975 .4475 8.826 P<0.01 significant
15 Stigmasterol 4 1.2825 .30325 8.458 P<0.01 significant
16 alpha-Amyrin 4 4.5125 .83512 10.807
P<0.01 significant
17
4,4,6a,6b,8a,11,12,14b-Octamethyl-1,4,4a,5,6,6a,6b, 7,8,8a,9,10,11,12,12a,14,14a, 4b-octadecahydro-2H-picen-3-1
4 1.1050 .37652 5.870 P<0.05 significant
18 .alpha-Amyrin 4 10.370 3.75596 5.522 P<0.05 significant
19 12-Oleanen-3-yl acetate, (3alpha)- 4 12.270 3.3244 7.382 P<0.01
significant
20 9,19-Cyclolanost-24-en-3-ol,acetate 4 2.3025 .56453 8.157 P<0.01
significant
21 Urs-12-en-24-oic acid, 3-oxo-,methyl ester,(+)- 4 14.310 1.1830 24.19
2 P<0.01 significant
22 Taraxasterol 4 3.7650 1.13353 6.643 P<0.01 significant
DF=3
92
Table 5.6d. Karl Pearson correlation between soil and the total numbers of
compound
Total numbers of compound vs.
Correlation value Statistical inference
Total magnesium -.965* P<0.05 Significant
N=5
5.3.1.1.6. Groups of phytochemicals
The identified 64 compounds (Table 5.6a) belong to different phytochemical
groups such as, terpenes, sterols, fatty acids, hydrocarbons, heterocyclic compounds,
phenolics and hydroxylamines (Table 5.7) Terpenes are the major constituents of the
chloroform extract. According to the percentage of compounds it can be arranged as
follows; Terpene Fatty acids>Hydrocarbon> Sterols>Heterocyclic
compounds>Phenolics>Hydroxylamines. According to the number of compounds it
can be arranged as follows; Hydrocarbon (8 - 14) > Terpenes (9 - 13) > Fatty acids (7
-12) >sterols (6 - 8)>Phenolics (1 - 2)> Heterocyclic compounds (1). The number
within the parentheses represents the number of component ranging between seasons.
Table 5.7. Groups of compounds identified in seasons
S.no. Compound group S1 S2 S3 S4
1 Terpenes 9 *(53.65 **)
12 * (65.14**) 11*(55.92**) 13*(62.44**)
2 Sterols 6*(11.54**) 6*(11.12**) 8 *(13.02**) 6*(8.61**)
3 Fatty acids 9*(19.94**) 7*(12.24**) 12*(12.56**) 7*(8.86**)
4 Hydrocarbons 8*(12.81**) 8 *(7.52**) 14*(14.10**) 12 *(15.85**)
5 Heterocyclic compounds 3 *(1.47**) 1 *(3.86**) 3*(4.18**) 1*(1.47**)
6 Phenolics 2 *(0.59**) 1*(0.12**) 2 *( 0.21**) -
7 Hydroxylamines - - - 1*(2.52**)
(* Total number; ** Tentative Quantity)
93
5.3.1.1.7. Seasonal variations in terpenoids
Terpenoids or terpenes comprise one of the most important groups of active
compounds in plants with over 20000 known structures. All terpenoid structures may
be derived from isoprene (five-carbon) units containing two unsaturated bonds. They
are synthesized from acetate via the mevalonic acid pathway (Pengelly, 2006).
The terpenes form the major portion of the chloroform extract of Calotropis.
There are 13 terpenes identified in the seasonal samples which can be classified as
monoterpenes, diterpenes, and triterpenes. The triterpenes are 11 in number (Table
5.8a). As per the number of terpene compounds present they are as follows: (S4)13>
(S2)12> (S3)11> (S1)9. Quantitatively they are in the following order: (S2)65.14% >
(S4)62.44% > (S3)55.92% > (S1)53.65%. The ‘Urs-20-en-3-ol, (3 beta 18 alpha, 19
alpha)’ are found only in the southwest monsoon. The seasonal variations in the
number and the quantity of terpenes are statistically significant (Table 5.8b).
The correlation analysis shows that the quantity of terpenes is significantly
associated with the heaviest rainfall (Table 5.8c). There is no correlation between the
soil parameters and the terpenes.
Triterpenoid compounds are derived from a C30 precursor, squalene
(Bruneton, 1995). They have similar configurations to steroids (found in plants and
animals) whose C27 skeletons are also derived from squalene (Pengelly, 2006).
Triterpenes attract attention because of their biological activities; e.g. taraxasterol,
beta-amyrine and alpha-amyrine, Taraxasterol was shown to exhibit considerable
activity against 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)-induced inflammatory
ear oedema in mice and tumor promotion in mouse skin (Akihisa et al., 1996).
Triterpene alcohols from the flowers of Compositae were demonstrated to possess
marked anti-inflammatory activity (Akihisa et al., 1996). Taraxerol possesses
antiulcer properties. α -Amyrine, lupeol and cycloartan-type triterpenes are cytotoxic
agents (Banskota et al., 1999).
Table 5.8b. Terpenoids identified in seasons
S.No. Compounds Name S1 S2 S3 S4
Monoterpenes
1. Bicyclo[3.1.1]heptane,2,6,6-trimethyl-,(1alpha ,2beta 5alpha) 0.53 0.52 0.25 0.28
94
Diterpenes (Acyclic) 2. Phytol 1.11 1.05 0.76 0.56 Triterpenes 3. Hop-22(29)-en-3.beta.-ol - 14.19 7.29 9.67 4. Urs-12-en-24-oic acid, 3-oxo-,methyl ester,(+)- 13.6 15.5 13.03 15.115. Squalene 1.76 0.89 1.84 0.97 6. Taraxasterol 4.16 5 3.6 2.3
7. A'-Neogammacer-22(29)-en-3-ol,acetate,(3.beta.,21.beta.)- - 1.39 - 1.55
Pentacyclic triterpene 8. Alpha-Amyrin 8.42 6.04 13.35 13.679. Beta-Amyrin 5.76 4.07 4.02 4.2 10. Lup-20(29)-en-3-ol,acetate,(3.beta.)- - 2.57 1.57 2.1 11. 12-Oleanen-3-yl acetate, (3.alpha.)- 16.9 12.44 9.58 10.1612. Urs-20-en-3-ol,(3.beta.,18.alpha.,19.alpha.)- - - - 1.09
13. Beta-Amyrene derivatives-4,4,6a,6b,8a,11,12,14b-Octamethyl-1,4,4a,5,6,6a, 6b,7,8,8a,9, 10,11,12,12a, 14, 14a,14b - octadecahydro-2H-picen-3-one
1.36
1.45
0.63
0.98
Table 5.8b. Seasonal variations in the quantity of Terpenes
(One sample t - test)
Parameter N Mean Std.
Deviation t Statistical inference
Number of Terpenes
4 11.25 1.708 13.175 P<0.01 significant
quantity of Terpenes
4 59.2875
5.39480 21.980 P<0.01 significant
DF= 3
Table 5.8c. Karl Pearson correlation between season and Number and quantity
of the terpenes
Correlation value Statistical inference Parameters Numbers of
Terpenes Quantity of Terpenes
Numbers of Terpenes
Quantity of Terpenes
Heaviest Rain .793 .972* P>0.05 Not Significant
P<0.05 Significant
N= 4
95
5.3.1.1.8. Hydrocarbons
Large numbers of the long chain hydrocarbons constitute the chloroform
extract (Table 5.9a). There are about 17 hydrocarbons present in the chloroform
extract.
The numbers of hydrocarbons ranges between 8 (northeast monsoon and pre-
summer) to 14 (summer). The quantity is about 7.52% in pre-summer and 15.85% in
(southwest monsoon). In summer 14.10% of Hydrocarbons are present. The major
types of hydrocarbon are found arer Alkanes, Alkenes, Carbocyclic acids and Pthalic
acids. A trace amount of Bicyclo [4.2.0] oct-2-ene, 3,7-dimethyl-7-(4-methyl-3-
pentenyl)-8-(2,6,10-trimethyl-1,5,9-undecatrienyl)-,[1.alpha.,6.alpha., 7.beta.,8.alpha
(1E,5E)]-; Octacosane17-Pentatriacontene; Nonadecane,1-chloro-; Z-12-Pentacosene
found only in the summer season. Heneicosane, 11-decyl-; 5-Ethylcyclopent-1-
enecarboxaldehyde are found in the southwest monsoon. 1, 2-Benzenedicarboxylic
acid, mono (2-ethylhexyl) ester is found only in the northeast monsoon. It may be due
to the favorable climate and soil conditions of the particular season.
The numbers and quantities of hydrocarbons exhibit statistically significant
variations among seasons (Table 5.9b).
The correlation analysis reveals that the numbers of hydrocarbons are
associated with mean R.H. evening and the lowest R.H.morning. The quantities of
hydrocarbons are linked with mean maximum and minimum temperatures and mean
R.H. morning (Table 5.9c). The numbers of hydrocarbons are associated with the
magnesium of the soil (Table 5.9d).
Table 5.9a. Hydrocarbons in seasons
S.No. Types of hydrocarbon S1 S2 S3 S4
Cyclic hydrocarbon
1.
Bicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene, 3,7-dimethyl-7- (4-methyl-3-pentenyl)-8-(2,6,10-trimethyl -1, 5, 9-undecatrienyl)-, [1.alpha., 6.alpha., 7.beta.,8.alpha.(1E,5E)]-
- - 0.92 -
2. Tricyclo[4.3.0.0(7,9)]nonane, 2,2,5,5,8,8- hexamethyl-,(1.alpha.,6.beta., 7.alpha.,9.alpha.)-
0.14 0.16 0.43 1.49
Alkanes 3. Tricosane 8.52 4.84 6.27 5.17 4. Nonacosane 1.97 1.21 1.53 1.88 5. Hexadecane 0.47 0.21 0.15 0.24 6. Tetradecane 0.41 0.16 0.15 0.21
96
7. Dodecane - 0.28 0.29 0.14 8. Z-14-Nonacosane - - 1.16 1.84 9. Octacosane - - 1.19 - 10. 17-Pentatriacontene - - 0.23 - 11. Heneicosane,11-decyl- - - - 0.89 Chlorinated 12. Nonadecane,1-chloro- - - 0.71 - 13 Heptacosane,1-chloro- 0.67 0.5 0.61 0.37 14 Z-12-Pentacosene - - 0.08 - 15 Heptacosane 0.67 0.5 0.61 0.37 Cyclopentanes 16 5-Ethylcyclopent-1-enecarboxaldehyde - - - 0.23 Carbocyclic acids pthalic acids
17 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, mono(2-ethylhexyl) ester 0.37 - - -
Table 5.9b. Seasonal variations in the Numbers and quantity of the Hydrocarbons
(One sample t - test)
DF= 3
Table 5.9c. Karl Pearson correlation between season and numbers and
quantity of the Hydrocarbons
Correlation value Statistical inference Parameters Numbers of
Hydrocarbons Quantity of Hydrocarbons
Numbers of Hydrocarbons
Quantity of Hydrocarbons
Mean max Temperature .828 .976 P>0.05 Not
significant P<0.05Significant
Mean Minimum temperature .686 1.000 P>0.05 Not
Significant P<0.01Significant
Mean R.H.morning -.633 -.991 P>0.05 Not Significant
P<0.01 Significant
Mean R.H. evening -.960 -.731 P<0.05 Significant
P>0.05 Not Significant
Lowest R.H. morning -.957 -.843 P<0.05
Significant P>0.05 Not Significant
N=4
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical inference
Numbers of Hydrocarbons 4 10.50 3.000 7.000 P<0.01 significant
Quantity of Hydrocarbons 4 12.57
00 3.58977 7.003 P<0.01 significant
97
Table 5.9d. Karl Pearson correlation between soil and numbers and quantity
of the Hydrocarbons
Correlation value Statistical inference Parameters Numbers of
Hydrocarbons Quantity of Hydrocarbons
Numbers of Hydrocaron
Quantity of Hydrocarbon
Magnesium .951* -.470 P<0.05 Significant
P>0.05 Not Significant
N= 4
5.3.1.1.9. Fatty acids
The fatty acids are varying significantly among the seasons (Table 5.10a).
There are about 15 fatty acids identified in the chloroform extract. A maximum
number of 12 compounds are present in the summer samples. The lowest number of 7
compounds are present in the pre-summer and northeast monsoon seasons. Also, they
are varying in the peak area percentage. The descending order of the number of fatty
acids is as follows:-
12 (S3) > 9 (S1) > 7 (S2) = (S4).
In the quantity the descending order is
19.94 (S1) >12.56(S3)>S2 (12.24)>S4 (8.86).
Tetracosanoic acid; methyl ester; Hexadecanamide; Tridecanoic acid, 12-
methyl-methylester; 9-Octadecanoic acid, methylester,(E); Octadecanoic acid, methyl
ester are present only in the summer season.2,6,10,14,18,22-
tetracosahexanone,2,6,10,15,9,23-hexamethyl-,(all-E) is present only in the southwest
monsoon. 9, 12-Octadecadienoic acid (z, z) is present only in the northeast monsoon.
The total number and quantity of fatty acids exhibits distinct variations among
seasons (Table 5.10b). The correlation analysis with seasons shows that there is no
relationship between meteorological elements. The quantity is linked with the soil
parameter - electrical conductivity and the numbers are linked with the sulphur
content of the soil (Table 5.10c).
The fatty acids are the well known active metabolites. They serve as an
important energetic substrate for the cells. Linoleic acid is essential for the
maintenance of growth and α- linolenic acid for neural functions. Both acids were
shown to be potent cycloxygenase-2 (COX-2) catalyzed prostaglandin biosynthesis
inhibitors (Ringbom et al., 2001).
98
Table 5.10a. Fatty acids in seasons
S.No. Types of Fatty acids S1 S2 S3 S4
1. Tetracosanoic acid,methyl ester - - 0.07 - Unsaturated 2. 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid,(Z,Z,Z)- 3.3 2.36 2.05 0.55 aturated 3. 9-Octadecenamide,(Z)- 4.42 2.51 2.47 3.99 Erucic acid 4. 13-Docosenamide,(Z)- 0.23 0.19 0.12 0.14 linoleic acids 5. 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid(z,z)- 0.91 - - - Palmitic acids 6. Hexadecanamide - - 0.37 - 7. n-Hexadecanoic acid 9.68 6.33 4.33 2.68 Esters, methyl 8. Hexadecanoic acid,methyl ester 0.17 0.19 1.3 - Myrsitic acids 9. Tetradecanoic acid 0.48 - 0.39 - Lauric acids 10. Dodecanamide 0.53 0.53 - 0.34 Stearic acids esters
11. Tridecanoic acid, 12-methyl-methylester - - 0.14 -
12. 9-Octadecanoic acid,methylester,(E)- - - 0.73 - 13. Octadecanoic acid,methyl ester - - 0.46 -
Omega-3 Derivatives Docosahexaenoic Acids
14. 2,6,10,14,18,22-tetracosahexanone,2,6,10,15,9,23-hexamethyl-,(all-E)-
- - - 0.89
Polymeric fatty acids 15 9-Octadecyne 0.23 0.15 0.15 0.28
Table 5.10b. Seasonal variations in the Numbers and quantity of the Fatty acids
(One sample t - test)
DF= 3
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical inference
Numbers of Fatty acids 4 8.75 2.363 7.406 P<0.01 significant
Quantity of Fatty acids 4 13.40
00 4.67027 5.738 P<0.05 significant
99
Table 5.10c. Karl Pearson correlation between soil parameters and the fatty acids
Correlation value Statistical inference Parameters Numbers of
fatty acids Quantity of fatty acids
Numbers of fatty acids
Quantity of fatty acids
EC 0.156 0.982* P>0.05 Not Significant
P< 0.05 Significant
Sulphur -.952* -007 P< 0.05 Significant
P>0.05 Not Significant
N= 4
5.3.1.1.10. Sterol composition
The next large numbers of compounds belongs to sterols (Table 5.11a). The
maximum numbers of compounds (8) is recorded in summer and other three seasons
are identical in the numbers of compounds (6). There are only four sterol compounds
present in the summer.
Quantitatively the order is S3 (13.02) > S1 (11.54)>S2 (11.12)>S4 (8.61).
The quality and quantity of sterols exhibit statistically significant seasonal
variations (Table 5.11b). The quality and quantity of sterols are not linked with
meteorological elements. The number is linked only with the sulphur content of the
soil (Table 5.11b).
Table 5.11a. Sterols in seasons
S.NO. TYPES OF STEROLCOMPOUND S1 S2 S3 S4
1. 9,19-Cyclolanost-24-en-3-ol,acetate 3.12 2.23 1.88 1.98 Phytosterols 2 Campesterol 1.7 2.06 2.57 1.57 3 Stigmasterol 1.21 1.1 1.73 1.09 4 gamma-Sitosterol - - 3.86 - 5 Stigmasterol,22,23-dihydro- 3.59 3.56 - 1.7
Cholesterols (Dehydrocholesterols)
6 Desmosterol - - 0.2 - Stigmasterols Analogs/Derivatives
7 Stigmasta-5,24(28)-dien-3-ol,(3.beta.,24Z)- - - 2.04 -
8 4,22-Stigmastadiene-3-one 1.69 0.89 - 1.68
Ergosterols Analogs/Derivatives (Withanolides)
9 Ergost-22-en-3-0l,(3.beta.,5.alpha.,22E,24R)- - - 0.32 -
10 Ergost-8,24(28)-dien-3-ol,4,14-dimethyl-,(3.beta.,4.alpha.,5.alpa.,)- 0.26 - 0.42 0.59
100
Steroids (Cholestenones)
11 Stigmastane-3, 6-dione, (5.alpha.) - 1.29 - -
Table 5.11b. Seasonal variations in the Numbers and quantity of the Sterols (One
sample t - test)
DF= 3
Table 5.11c. Karl Pearson correlation between soil and numbers and quantity of
the Sterols
Correlation value Statistical inference Parameters Numbers of
Sterols Quantity of Sterols Numbers of Sterols Quantity of
Sterols
Sulphur -.991** -.793 P<0.05 significant P>0.05 Not significant
N=4
Sterols are important constituents of all eukaryotes. They play a vital role in
plant cell membranes. Plant sterols are physiologically very active; they are
precursors of many hormones and oviposition stimulants of some insects (Harborne,
2001).
Phytosterols such as stigmasterol and sitosterol are essential components of
cell membranes, and they are also used as the starting material in the production of
steroidal drugs. Phytosterols are characterised by a hydroxyl group attached at C-3
and an extra methyl or ethyl substituent in the side chain which are not present in the
animal sterols (Harborne and Baxter, 1993).
Phytosterols are minor but beneficial components of the human diet. Since
they inhibit growth of tumours and help in the regulation of blood cholesterol, they
are therapeutically important. Many herbs e.g. Withania somnifera (Pengelly, 2005);
Urtica dioica (Hirano et al., 1994) and Commiphora mukul (Bruneton, 1995) are rich
some of steroidal compounds.
The typical plant sterols, sitosterol and stigmasterol, appeared as main sterol
components (Nes and Parish, 1989). Sitosterol possesses antihyperlipoproteinaemic,
antibacterial and antimicotic activities and has been shown to act as inhibitor of tumor
cells (Yasukawa et al., 1991; Kasahara et al., 1994); cancer cells (Raicht et al., 1980).
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical inference Numbers of Sterols 4 6.50 1.000 13.000 P<0.01 significant Quantity of Sterols 4 11.0725 1.83280 12.083 P<0.05 significant
101
They also exhibit significant inhibitory effect on HIV reverse transcriptase (Akihisa et
al., 2001).A mixture of stigmasterol and sitosterol was shown to possess anti-
inflammatory activity upon tropical application (Gomez et al., 1999). They are used
for the treatment of prostate problems (Gomez et al., 1999).
5.3.1.1.11. Heterocyclic Compounds
There are three biologically important heterocyclic compounds identified
(Table 5.12a). These three compounds occur only in the northeast monsoon and the
summer. Quantitatively it can be arranged as S3 (4.18) >S2 (3.86) S1 & S4 (1.47).
The quality and quantity of these compounds displays statistically significant
seasonal variations (Table 5.12b). The quality of compounds shows significant
relationship with heaviest the rainfall and the quantity is linked with lowest R.H.
(Table 5.12c).
Table 5.12a. Heterocyclic compounds in the plants – seasonal study
S.No. Compound name S1 S2 S3 S4
Benzopyrans
1. Vitamin E 1.15 3.86 3.85 1.47
2. 2(4H)-Benzofuranone,5,6,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl- 0.08 - 0.06 -
Tocopherols
3. gamma-Tocopherol 0.25 - 0.26 -
Table 5.12b. Seasonal variations in the Numbers and quantity of the Heterocyclic
Compounds (One sample t - test)
DF = 3
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical inference
Numbers of Heterocyclic Compounds
4 2.00 1.155 3.464 P<0.05 significant
Quantity of Heterocyclic Compounds
4 2.7450 1.47803 3.714 P<0.05 significant
102
Table 5.12c. Karl Pearson correlation between season and numbers and quantity
of the Heterocyclic Compounds
Correlation value Statistical inference
Parameters Numbers of Heterocyclic Compounds
Quantity of Heterocyclic Compounds
Numbers of Heterocyclic Compounds
Quantity of Heterocyclic Compounds
Lowest R.H. evening -.345 -.958* P>0.05 Not Significant
P<0.05 Significant
Total Rainfall -.933 -.403 P>0.05 Not Significant
P>0.05 Not Significant
Heaviest Rain -.993** -.022 P<0.01 Significant
P>0.05 Not Significant
N=4
5.3.1.1.12. Phenolics
Two phenolics are recorded through the GCMS analysis (Table 5.13a.). The 2-
Methoxy vinyl phenol is present in northeast monsoon and summer. The 2, 4-bis (1,
1-dimethyl) is not present in the southwest monsoon. The quantity varies as follows
S1 (0.59)>S3 (0.21)>S2 (0.12).The seasonal variations in the phenolics compounds
are statistically not significant (Table5.13b).
Table 5.13a. Phenolic compounds in seasons
S.No. Types of phenolics S1 S2 S3 S4
1 phenol, 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl) 0.24 0.12 0.11 -
Catechols
2 2-Methoxy-4-vinyl phenol 0.35 - 0.11 -
Table 5.13b. Seasonal variations in the Numbers and quantity of the Phenolics
Compounds (One sample t - test)
DF = 3
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical inference
Numbers of Phenolics Compounds 4 1.25 .957 2.611 P>0.05 Not significant
Quantity of Phenolics Compounds 4 .2300 .25495 1.804 P>0.05 Not significant
103
Phenolics usually possess antimicrobial and antifungal activities and
consequently defensive in function. Aldehydes and ketones often act as
allelochemicals. Such activities are reported for all the three aldehydes identified in
the present study. Decanal is an attractant for some insects (Mattiacci et al., 2001;
Wang et al., 1999), while nonanal is a repellent (Huber and Borden, 2001; Wang et
al., 1999). Decanal has some pheromone- like activity (Cosse et al., 2002).
5.3.1.1.13. Hydroxylamine
Only one Hydroxylamine Oxime - Pyridine-3-Carboxamide, oxime, N-(2-
trifluromethyl phenyl - is identified in the southwest monsoon. The variations in the
number and quantity are statistically not significant (Table 5.14a).
Table 5.14a. Seasonal variations in the Numbers and quantity of the
Hydroxylamine Compounds (One sample t - test)
DF=3
5.3.1.2. Seasonal variations in the inorganic Compounds
5.3.1.2.1. Seasonal variations in the ash content
Total ash value of plant material represents the amount of minerals and earthy
materials attached. The presence of ash shows a significant difference between
seasons (figure 5.6 and Table 5.15a). The samples of southwest monsoon season (S4)
possesses highest ash content (1.79 %) and that of summer season (S3) possess the
lowest amount of ash (1.58%), Amin et al., (2007) have reported variation in the
percentage of ash matter, between dry season and green seasons in Sudan.
The ash content shows significant relationship with lowest R.H. evening and
the nitrogen, potassium and sulphur contents of the soil (Table 5.15b and 5.15c)
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical inference
Numbers of Hydroxylamine 4 .25 .500 1.000 P>0.05 Not significant
Quantity of Hydroxylamine 4 .63 1.260 1.000 P>0.05 Not significant
104
1.69
1.621.58
1.79
1.451.5
1.551.6
1.651.7
1.751.8
1.85
S1 S2 S3 S4
Seasons
Ash
(%)
Figure 5.6. Presence of ash in seasons
Table 5.15a. Variations in ash content (One sample t - test)
parameter N Mean Std. Deviation T Statistical inference
Ash (%) 4 1.6700 .09201 36.299 P<0.01 significant
DF= 3
Table 5.15b. Karl Pearson correlation between season and variations in the ash content
Ash content vs. Correlation value Statistical inference
Lowest R.H. evening .966* P<0.05 Significant
N= 4
Table 5.15c. Karl Pearson correlation between soil and variations in the ash content
Ash content vs. Correlation value Statistical inference
Total Nitrogen -.989* P<0.05 Significant
Potassium -.968* P<0.05 Significant
Sulphur -.975* P<0.05 Significant
N= 4
5.3.1.2.2. Essential macro nutrients
105
The nitrogen, Phosphorous, potassium, calcium, magnesium, and sulphur
show significant seasonal variations (Table 5.16a).
Nitrogen is the second most important element of organic matter in plants.
Nitrogen content in the plants of red clover is relatively lower after the main crop
(spring barley) harvest; it reaches its peak at the start of the vegetation period in the
spring. In the subsequent stages of biomass growth, nitrogen content in red clover
becomes stable till the blooming is completed, (Brogowski, 2002). The nitrogen
(Figure 5.7a) is slightly high in the summer season (2.24%) and low in the pre-
summer (2.13%).
The phosphorous (figure 5.7b) and potassium (Figure 5.7c) are slightly higher
in the southwest monsoon (S4) and slightly lower in pre-summer season. Yoo et al.,
(1996) observed the seasonal variation in the nitrogen content. In winter the nitrogen
content was high in his study.
Phosphorus (H2PO4) content shows similar trends to that of nitrogen. Its
highest content occurs after the winter and further decreases very slowly till the stage
of blossom shed. This trend has been most likely due to carbohydrate loss as observed
along the winter time. The stems contain relatively low amounts of phosphates, richer
are leaves, and inflorescence are the richest (Brogowski, 2002).
The correlation analysis shows that the nitrogen is linked with lowest R.H.
morning and heaviest rainfall. The phosphorous is associated with highest R.H.
(morning and evening) and the wind speed. The potassium is associated with the
lowest temperature and the wind speed (Table 5.16b). The potassium and the
phosphorous are connected with the pH of the soil (Table 5.16c).
2.16
2.13
2.24
2.18
2.06
2.08
2.1
2.12
2.14
2.16
2.18
2.2
2.22
2.24
2.26
S1 S2 S3 S4Seasons
N I
t r o
g e
n (
% )
0.42 0.40.43
0.53
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
S1 S2 S3 S4Seasons
P h
o s
p h
o r
o u
s ( %
)
Figure 5.7a.Nitrogen Figure 5.7b. phosphorous
106
2.97
2.81
2.94
3.28
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
S1 S2 S3 S4Seasons
P o
t a s
s iu
m( %
)
Figure 5.7c. Potassium
Table 5.16a. Seasonal variations in nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium
(One sample t - test)
parameter N Mean Std. Deviation T Statistical
inference Total Nitrogen (%) 4 2.1775 .04646 93.741 P<0.01
significant Total Phosphorous (%)
4 .4450 .05802 15.339 P<0.01 significant
Total Potassium (%) 4 3.0000 .19916 30.126 P<0.01
significant DF= 3
Table 5.16b. Karl Pearson correlation between seasonal elements and variations
in the nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium
Correlation value Statistical inference Parameters
Nitrogen phosphorous potassium Nitrogen phosphoro
us potassium
Lowest temperature .496 .949 .959* P>0.05 N.S P>0.05 N.S P<0.05
Significant Highest R.H. morning -.036 -.977* -.937 P>0.05 N.S P<0.05
Significant P>0.05 N.S
Highest R.H. evening -.125 -.987* -.944 P>0.05 N.S P<0.05
Significant P>0.05 N.S
Lowest R.H. morning -.952* -.515 -.517 P<0.05
Significant P>0.05 N.S P>0.05 N.S
Heaviest Rain -.633 .293 .157 P<0.01
Significant P>0.05 N.S P>0.05 N.S
Mean Wind Speed .066 .981* .981* P>0.05 N.S P<0.05
Significant P<0.05 Significant
N= 4; N.S= Not significant
107
Table 5.16c. Karl Pearson correlation between soil and variations in the
nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium
Correlation value Statistical inference
Parameters Nitrogen
phospho
rous potassium Nitrogen phosphorous potassium
pH .215 988* .999** P>0.05 N.S P<0.05 Significant
P<0.05 Significant
N= 4; N.S= Not significant The other macronutrients, calcium, magnesium, and sulphur are depicted in
figures 5.7d to7.7f. The calcium is high in summer (4.84%) and low in the southwest
monsoon season (3.64%). where as the magnesium is high in the pre-summer season
(3.62%) and also low in southwest monsoon (2.59%). On the other hand the sulphur is
very high (0.98%) in southwest monsoon and low (0.47%) in summer. These
elements are significantly varying seasons to seasons (Table 5.16d).
The Calcium variation is subject to the highest R.H. (morning and evening)
and the wind speed. The calcium is associated with the nitrogen .The magnesium is
related to the lowest temperature and mean R.H. morning and the soil pH. The
sulphur is grately related to highest R.H. (morning and evening) and wind speed
(Table 5.16e and 5.16f).
4.59 4.62 4.84
3.64
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
S1 S2 S3 S4Seasons
C a
l c
iu m
( %
)
3.16
3.623.19
2.59
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
S1 S2 S3 S4Seasons
M a
g n
e s
iu m
( %
)
Figure 5.7d. Calcium Figure 5.7e. Magnesium
108
0.48 0.51 0.47
0.98
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
S1 S2 S3 S4Seasons
S u
l p h
u r
(%)
Figure 5.7f. Sulphur
Table 5.16d. Variations in the macro nutrients (One sample t - test)
parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical inference
Total Calcium (%) 4 4.4225 .53344 16.581 P<0.01 significant Total Magnesium (%) 4 3.1400 .42261 14.860 P<0.01 significant Total Sulphur (%) 4 .6100 .24725 4.934 P<0.05 significant
DF= 3
Table 5.16e. Karl Pearson correlation between season and variations in the
calcium, magnesium and sulphur
Correlation value Statistical inference Parameters
Calcium Magnesium Sulphur Calcium Magnesium Sulphur
Lowest temperature -.766 -.978* .822 P>0.05
N.S P<0.05 Significant
P>0.05 N.S
Mean R.H. morning .608 .957* -.648 P>0.05
N.S P<0.05 Significant
P>0.05 N.S
Highest R.H. morning .978* .868 -.998** P<0.05
Significant P>0.05 N.S
P<0.01 Significant
Highest R.H. evening .955* .885 -.989* P<0.05
Significant P>0.05 N.S
P<0.05 Significant
Mean Wind Speed
-.967*
-.934
.968*
P<0.05 Significant
P>0.05 N.S
P<0.05 Significant
N=4; N.S. = Not significant
109
Table 5.16f. Karl Pearson correlation between soil and variations in the Calcium,
Magnesium and sulphur
Correlation value Statistical inference Parameters
Calcium Magnesium Sulphur Calcium Magnesium Sulphur
pH 915 -.977* .930 P>0.05 N.S
P<0.05 Significant
P>0.05 N.S
Total Nitrogen .977* .840 -.934 P<0.05 Significant
P>0.05 N.S
P>0.05 N.S
N=4; N.S. = Not significant
5.3.1.2.3 Essential micro nutrients
The significant impact was observed in the micronutrients. Zn, Cu, Fe, Mn,
Bo, and Mb are low in the southwest monsoon. Except Fe, Mn and Bo all the other
micronutrients are higher in summer. Fe, Mn and Bo are higher in pre-summer. The
contnent of zinc is 3.46 ppm (Figure 5.8a). The highest concentration of copper is
1.12 ppm. (Figure 5.8b). The (Figure 5.8c) highest iron concentration is 159.3 ppm
and the Mn (Figure 5.8d) is 26.34 ppm. The highest value of Bo is 0.13 ppm. (Figure
5.8e).The molybdenum (Figure 5.8f) is high in the S3 (0.13 ppm).
The seasonal variations are statistically significant (Table 5.17a and 5.17b).
The variation of zinc is not linked with any of the climataological elements. The
copper is associated with highest R.H. morning and mean wind speed. The iron is
subjected to the highest R.H. (morning and evening) and the mean wind speed (Table
5.17c).
The manganese and boron show significant relationship with the highest R.H.
(morning and evening) and the mean wind speed. The zinc and copper are associated
with the total nitrogen content of the soil. (Table 5.17d). The manganese is relevant to
the pH, total nitrogen. The molybdenum is associated with the total nitrogen and the
sodium present in the soil (Table 5.17e.)
110
3.19 3.29 3.46
2.84
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
S1 S2 S3 S4Seasons
Z in
c(p
p m
)
0.971.06
1.12
0.56
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
S1 S2 S3 S4Seasons
Cop
per(
ppm
)
Figure 5.8a. Zinc Figure 5.8b. Copper
156.3 159.3 157.2
110.2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
S1 S2 S3 S4Seasons
Iron(
ppm
)
22.64
26.34 25.87
12.36
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
S1 S2 S3 S4Seasons
M a
n g
a n
e s
e (p
pm)
Figure 5.8c. Iron Figure 5.8d. Manganese
0.120.13
0.12
0.05
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
S1 S2 S3 S4
Seasons
Bor
on(p
pm)
0.1 0.1
0.13
0.05
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
S1 S2 S3 S4Seasons
M o
l y
b d
e n
u m
( p
p m
)
Figure 5.8e. Boron Figure 5.8f. Molybdenum
111
Table 5.17a. Variations in the micronutrients (One sample t - test)
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical inference
Total Zinc (ppm) 4 3.1950 .26160 24.427 P<0.01 significant Total Copper (ppm) 4 .9275 .25264 7.343 P<0.01 significant Total Iron (ppm) 4 145.750 23.7333 12.282 P<0.01 significant Total Manganese (ppm) 4 21.8025 6.50630 6.702 P<0.01 significant Total Boron (ppm) 4 .2175 .18839 2.309 P>0.05 Not significant Total Molybdenum (ppm) 4 .095 .0332 5.729 P<0.05 significant
DF= 3
Table 5.17b. Karl Pearson correlation between season and variations in the zinc,
copper and Iron
Correlation value Statistical inference Parameters
Zinc Copper Iron Zinc Copper Iron Highest R.H. morning .905 .970* .999** P>0.05
N.S P<0.05 Significant
P<0.01 Significant
Highest R.H. evening .864 .948 .995** P>0.05
N.S P>0.05 N.S
P<0.01 Significant
Mean Wind Speed -.927 -.983* -.988* P>0.05
N.S P<0.05 Significant
P<0.05 Significant
N= 4; N.S= Not significant
Table 5.17c. Karl Pearson correlation between season and variations in the
manganese, boron and molybdenum
Correlation value Statistical inference Parameters
Manganese Boron molybdenum Manganese Boron molybden
um Highest R.H. morning .968* -1.000** .905 P<0.05
Significant P<0.01 Significant P>0.05 N.S
Highest R.H. evening .954* -.994** .861 P<0.05
Significant P<0.01 Significant P>0.05 N.S
Mean Wind Speed -.997** .974* -.895 P<0.01 Significant
P<0.05 Significant P>0.05 N.S
N= 4; N.S= Not significant
Table 5.17d. Karl Pearson correlation between soil and variations in the zinc,
copper and Iron
Correlation value Statistical inference Parameters
Zinc copper iron Zinc copper iron
Total nitrogen .992** .993** 939 P<0.05 Significant
P<0.01 Significant
P>0.05 N.S
N= 4; N.S= Not significant
112
Table 5.17e. Karl Pearson correlation between soil and variations in the,
Manganese, Boron and the Molybdenum
Correlation value Statistical inference Parameters Mangane
se Boron Molybdenum Manganese Boron Molybdenu
m
pH -.976* .944 -.814 P<0.05 Significant P>0.05 N.S P>0.05 N.S
Total nitrogen .981* -.932 .967* P<0.05 Significant P>0.05 N.S P<0.05
Significant
sodium .877 -.803 .966* P>0.05 N.S P>0.05 N.S P<0.05 Significant
N= 4; N.S= Not significant
5.3.1.2.4. Seasonal variations in the non essential element
The chromium (Figure 5.9a) shows meager variations among the seasonal
samples. The highest value of the chromium is 0.005 mg/g (southwest monsoon and
the lowest value is recorded in the pre-summer (0.1 mg/g). the difference is 0.4 mg/g.
Nickel is high (0.04 mg/g) in the southwest monsoon and low in the northeast
monsoon and pre-summer (0.01 mg/g) (Figure 5.9b).
The cadmium is high (0.05 mg/g) in northeast monsoon and low in summer
and southwest monsoon seasons (0.03 mg/g) (Figure 5.9c). The lead is high (0.16
mg/g) in the southwest monsoon and low (0.12 mg/g) in northeast monsoon and
summer seasons (Figure 5.9d).
Except northeast monsoon (0.2 mg/g) all other seasons possessed the equal
quantities of cobalt (Figure 5.9e). In the content of mercury (Figure 5.9f) there is
meager difference found. In the pre-summer and southwest monsoons the mercury is
0.002 mg/g and in the northeast monsoon it is 0.001 (mg/g).
The Silver (Figure 5.9g) is ranging between 0.05 (northeast monsoon and
summer) to 0.06 mg/g (pre-summer and southwest monsoon). In all the seasons
selenium (Figure 5.9h) is found to be higher. Among these the highest concentration
is recorded in the summer and the lowest concentration (0.57 mg/g) is recorded in the
southwest monsoon. The difference is 0.08g. The silver concentration is high (0.06
mg/g) in the pre-summer and the southwest monsoon and low in the northeast
monsoon and the summer seasons. Arsenic and Cyanide are not present at all.
113
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.005
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
S1 S2 S3 S4
Chr
omiu
m (
mg/
g
)
0.01 0.01
0.02
0.04
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
0.045
S1 S2 S3 S4
Nic
kel (
mg/
g )
Except chromium, nickel and the other analysed non essential elements
cadmium, lead, cobalt, mercury, silver and selenium show significant seasonal
variations (Table 5.18a).
The lead is highly correlated with the R.H (morning and evening). Cobalt is
highly subjected to the number of rainy days. Mercury is related to the heaviest
rainfall. Silver is linked to the R.H (morning and evening) and heaviest rainfall (Table
5.18c). The variations in the cadmium and selenium are not subjected to the
meterological elements (Table 5.18b and d).
Selenium (Se) is an essential micronutrient for many organisms, including
plants, animals and humans. The concentration of Se in plant varies between areas
(Zhu et al., 2009). Too much Se can lead to toxicity and the low level causes
deficiency. Worldwide, interest in the biological impacts of Se on the environment
and food chains is increasing because it is an essential micronutrient for many
organisms, including humans and other animals (although it is toxic at higher
concentrations) ( Terry et al., 2000). It is also a beneficial nutrient for many plants,
including higher plant taxa (Pilon Smits et al., 2009; Lyons et al., 2009).
In organisms that require Se, selenocysteine (Se Cys) is an essential
component in the so-called selenoproteins or selenoenzymes (Rayman 2002), 25 of
which have been identified in humans (Kryukov et al., 2003; Lu and Holmgren,
2009). Selenoproteins have a redox function involved in free-radical scavenging (Lu
and Holmgren, 2009), and several studies have shown that improving Se status can
lower the risk of cancer (Clark et al., 1996; Wallace et al., 2009). Se speciation varies
with plant species and the form of Se fed to the plant (Reid et al., ,2008; Sors et al.,
2005; Ximenez-Embun et al., 2004; Kapolna and fodder, 2006; Kapolna et al., 2007;
Grant et al., 2004). It is well documented that inter- and intraspecific variation in Se
accumulation in plants exists (Zhu et al., 2009).
Figure 5.9a. Chromium Figure 5.9b.Nickel
114
0.05
0.04
0.03 0.03
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
S1 S2 S3 S4
Cad
miu
m (
mg
/ g)
0.120.13
0.12
0.16
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
S1 S2 S3 S4
Lea
d (m
g / g
)
Figure 5.9c. Cadmium Figure 5.9d. Lead
0.02
0.03 0.03 0.03
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
S1 S2 S3 S4
Cob
alt (
mg
/ g )
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.002
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0.002
0.0025
S1 S2 S3 S4
Mer
cury
(mg
/ g )
Figure 5.9e. Cobalt Figure 5.9f. Mercury
0.05
0.06
0.05
0.06
0.044
0.046
0.048
0.05
0.052
0.054
0.056
0.058
0.06
0.062
S1 S2 S3 S4
Silv
er (m
g /g
)
0.620.63
0.65
0.57
0.52
0.54
0.56
0.58
0.6
0.62
0.64
0.66
S1 S2 S3 S4
Sel
eniu
m (m
g /g
)
Figure 5.9g. Silver Figure 5.9h. Selenium
Table 5.18a. Variations in the nonessential elements (One sample t - test)
parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical inference Total chromium 4 .00250 .001732 2.887 P>0.05 Not significant Total Nickel 4 .0200 .01414 2.828 P>0.05 Not significant Total Cadmium 4 .0375 .00957 7.833 P<0.01 significant Total lead 4 .1325 .01893 13.999 P<0.01 significant Total Cobalt 4 .0275 .00500 11.000 P<0.01 significant Total Mercury 4 .00150 .000577 5.196 P<0.05significant Total Silver 4 .0550 .00577 19.053 P<0.01significant Total Selenium 4 .6175 .03403 36.287 P<0.01significant
DF= 3
115
Table 5.18b. Karl Pearson correlation between season and variations in
cadmium, lead and cobalt
Correlation value Statistical inference Parameters
cadmium lead cobalt cadmium lead cobalt
Highest R.H. morning .522 -.968* -.333 P>0.05 N.S P<0.05
Significant P>0.05 N.S
Highest R.H. evening .588 -.953* -.375 P>0.05 N.S P<0.05
Significant P>0.05 N.S
Numbers of Rainy Days .870 -.440 -
1.000** P>0.05 N.S P>0.05 N.S P<0.01 Significant
N=4; N.S= not significant
Table 5.18c. Karl Pearson correlation between season and variations in mercury,
silver and selenium
Correlation value Statistical inference Parameters mercury silver selenium mercury silver selenium
Highest R.H. morning -.577 -.577 .930 P>0.05
N.S P<0.05 Significant
P>0.05 N.S
Highest R.H. evening -.537 -.537 .894 P>0.05
N.S P<0.05 Significant
P>0.05 N.S
Heaviest Rainfall .993** .993** -.527 P<0.01
Significant P<0.01 Significant
P>0.05 N.S
N=4; N.S= not significant
Table 5.18d.Karl Pearson correlation between soil and variations in cadmium,
lead and cobalt
Correlation value Statistical inference Parameters
cadmium lead cobalt cadmium Lead cobalt
EC .900 -.585 -.985* P>0.05 N.S P>0.05 N.S P<0.05 Significant
Manganese .525 -.970* -.576 P>0.05 N.S P<0.05 Significant P>0.05 N.S
N=4; N.S= Not significant
5.3.1.3 Discussion
The seasonal carbohydrate cycles are particularly well defined in many
deciduous trees of the temperate zone. Total carbohydrate contents of stems and
branches reach a maximum in autumn at the time of leaf fall, begin to decrease in late
winter, and decrease rapidly in early spring when carbohydrates are being depleted by
accelerated respiration and used in growth of new tissues (Kramer and Kozlowski,
1979).Seasonal changes in carbohydrate concentrations have been reported is many
116
plants (Bonicel et al., 1987; Ashworth et al., 1993; Rinne et al., 1994; Barbarox and
Breda, 2002; Bhowmik and Matsui, 2003).
The lowest nitrogen contents of branchlets at the different development stages
occurred in summer, when the growth is active in Cassuarina equisetifolia (Zhang et
al., 2009). A portion of N was allocated to other portions (e.g., roots and flowers); for
example, the peak of the flowering period appears from April to June for C.
equisetifolia (Morton, 1980). Similarly, Aerts et al., 1999) suggested that summer
warming reduced N contents of mature and senescent leaves in Rubus.
Second, N contents was diluted by branchlet’s mass accumulation during
summer when C. equisetifolia grew rapidly. Changes in leaf N contents has direct
impact on the photosynthetic capacity of the species involved, as there is usually a
direct relation between leaf N content and the maximum rate of photosynthesis
(Lambers et al., 1998). This may be true of Calotropis also.
It is common to find a negative correlation between N and secondary
compound contents, such as phenolics and tannins (Horner et al., 1987; Mansfield et
al., 1999).The carbon nutrient balance (CNB) hypothesis postulates that phenolic
levels in plants are determined by the balance between carbon and other nutrient
availability (Bryant et al., 1983). The growth-differentiation balance (GDB)
hypothesis (Loomis, 1932; Lorio, 1986; Herms and Mattson, 1992) considers factors
that limit growth and differentiation (the sum of chemical and morphological changes
that occur in maturing cells, including carbon-based secondary synthesis) also limit N.
The production of phenolics dominates when factors other than photosynthate supply
are suboptimal for growth.
This pattern tend to support source-sink hypotheses, such as the carbon
nutrient balance hypothesis (Bryant et al., 1983) and the growth-differentiation
balance hypothesis (Herms and Mattson, 1992) that predict increased C allocation to
secondary C compounds under low nutrient conditions. In this study at summer the
nitrogen concentration is high. At the time of increased nitrogen the hydrocarbons, the
fatty acids and sterols also tend to be at the higher side.
Several researchers have noted pronounced seasonal variation in the elemental
concentration in plants elsewhere in the world, with the largest trace metal
concentrations generally occurring in the springtime (Ashton & Riese 1989, Stednick
et al. 1987).
117
Leaves and twigs from various shrub species were evaluated for comparative
seasonal contents of Ca, Mg, Na, K, P, Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn. Plants were collected in
summer, autumn, winter and spring in the counties: Linares, Santiago, Iturbide and
Montemorelos belonging to the state of Nuevo Leon, Mexico. During summer,
mineral concentrations were higher in general. Only Ca, Mg, K, Mn and Fe were in
substantial amounts (Ram´ırez et al., 2006).
The seasonal variation of the essential oil extracts from the aerial parts of a
Santolina rosmarinifolia population has been studied in detail by Paul et al., (2001).
He found that the oil yields increased in the months of March, April, May and June.
Oil concentration showed significant correlations with both precipitation (positive)
and temperature (negative). The main components of the essential oil showed a
significant negative correlation with temperature, while capillene offered a strong
positive correlation with precipitation. The rest of the essential oil components did not
show any noticeable trend.
Faini et al., (1999) observe that the production of epicuticular waxes to be at a
minimum level in winter when the relative percentage of less polar compounds
(waxes and hydrophobic solids) increases in comparison to the other seasons. A high
production of epicuticular waxes in Summer, when drought and solar radiation is
highest, suggests that the polar solids (triterpenes, flavonoids, diterpene acids) present
in high concentrations might act as a physical barrier to prevent water permeation and
dehydration of the leaves and filtering or reflecting of incident light (Harborne et al.,
1975). By contrast, during the winter season, production of waxes decreases as a
result of the low vegetative activity and changes in chemical composition could then
be explained in terms of a thermoregulatory action of the hydrophobic compounds
which would also protect the plant from desiccation due to the wind. Costa et al.,
(2009) found a clear seasonal influence on the essential oil compositions. Variations
of the Camptothecin content of Nothapodytes nimmoniana according to the seasons
and locations are well documented (Namdeo et al., 2010).
The overall seasonal variation in the macro and micro nutrients and the
secondary metabolites shows that some prominent differences occur between seasons.
The organic carbon (2.75%), carbohydrate (1.02%), protein (0.62%), lipids (0.3%),
ash content (1.79%) phosphorous (0.53%), potassium (3.28%), sulphur (0.98%) and
lead (0.16mg/g) are higher in southwest monsoon. At the same time the calcium
(3.64%), magnesium (2.59%), zinc (2.84 ppm), copper (0.56 ppm), iron (110.2ppm),
118
manganese (12.36ppm), boron (0.05ppm), molybdenum (0.05ppm) and selenium
(0.57mg/g) are found to be low in the southwest monsoon. The meteorological
elements such as mean maximum temperature (36.3 °C) and rain fall (384 mm) and
mean wind speed (11.7kmph) are high in this season. The mean R.H morning (67.7%)
and evening (46.3 %) are comparatively low in this season. The variation in this
analysed parameters may be due to the mean maximum and minimum temperature,
Highest temperature, highest and lowest R.H. (morning and evening), mean R.H.
(morning and evening), heaviest rainfall, numbers of rainy days, heaviest rainfall and
mean wind speed.
5.3.2. Locational variations
5.3.2.1. Locational variations in the organic compounds
5.3.2.1.1. Organic carbon
The quantity of organic carbon is high (27.5%) in the coastal tract (L1) and the
terrestrial-rural stretch (L4). In the riverine zone (L3) it is meager (26.2 %) (Figure
5.10). The organic carbon shows statistically significant variations among locations
(Table 5.19). The organic carbon shows no correlation with meteorological and soil
parameters.
27.5
26.5
26.2
27.5
26.4
25.4
25.6
25.826
26.2
26.4
26.6
26.8
27
27.2
27.4
27.6
Org
anic
car
bon
(%)
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
Figure 5.10. Organic carbon in the plant (locational study)
119
Table 5.19. Locational variations in the organic carbon (One sample t - test)
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical Inference
Organic Carbon (%) 5 26.82 .6301 95.18 P<0.01 significant
DF = 4
5.3.2.1.2. Locational variations in carbohydrate, protein and lipid
Statistically significant variations are noticed in the quantity of
macromolecules (carbohydrate, protein and lipid) among the locations studied (Table
5.20). The maximum amount of carbohydrate (10.6%) is present in the coastal tract
(L1) and the lowest level (10.2%) is present in the terrestrial-rural stretch (L4).
The protein is also slightly higher (6.9 %) in the coastal tract (L1) and low
(5.8%) in riverine zone (L3). The lipid is slightly higher (3.3%) in the hilly terrain
(L2) and low (2.8%) in the terrestrial -urban area (L5) (Figure 5.11).
The locational variations in the carbohydrate, protein, and lipid show no
relationship with the meteorological elements and the soil parameters.
10.6
6.9
2.9
10.3
6.4
3.3
10.5
5.8
3.1
10.2
6.2
3
10.3
6.4
2.8
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
( % )
1 2 3 4 5
Carbohydrate
Proteins
Lipids
Figure 5.11. Carbohydrate, protein and lipid in the plant- locational study
Table 5.20. Locational variations in the carbohydrate, protein and lipid
(One sample t - test)
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical Inference
Carbohydrate 5 10.380 0.1643 141.254 P<0.01 significant
Protein 5 6.340 0.3975 35.665 P<0.01 significant
Lipid 5 3.020 0.1924 35.107 P<0.01 significant
DF = 4
120
110.235 109.925
105.485 105.56 105.225
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
5.3.2.1.3. Locational variations in the energy content
The energy values of the plant samples are varying significantly in accordance
with the macro molecules (Table.5.21). The range is 105.225 calories/ 100 g (L5-
terrestrial-urban area) to 110.235 calories/ 100 g (L1- coastal tract) (Figure 5.12).
Figure 5.12. Locational variations in the energy content
The locational variation in the energy content is highly correlated with the
meteorological elements (Table 5.22). The energy content of the plant sample shows
no relationship with the soil.
Table 5.21. Locational variations in the energy value
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical Inference
Calorific value 5 9.4060 .20864 100.808 P<0.01 significant
DF = 4
Table 5.22. Karl Pearson correlation between meteorological elements and calorific value
Calorie value vs. Correlation value Statistical inference
Seasonal lowest temperature .980** P<0.01 Significant
Monthly lowest temperature .917* P<0.05 Significant.
Annual highest R.H. evening -.932* P<0.05 Significant
Annual lowest R.H. morning -.927* P<0.05 Significant
Annual lowest R.H. evening .982** P<0.01 Significant
Annual heaviest rainfall -.977** P<0.01 Significant
Seasonal heaviest rainfall -.963** P<0.01 Significant
Monthly heaviest rainfall -941* P<0.05 Significant
Annual numbers of rainy days 972** P<0.01 Significant
N=4
121
5.3.2.1.4. Locational variations in the yield of extract
The extract yield potential of the plant varies significantly from location to
location (Figures 5.13). The plant collected at the coastal tract provided the maximum
quantity of the extract (6.9%) and the terrestrial urban area sample yielded the lowest
amount (4 %). This variation is statistically significant (Table 5.23)
The yield of extracts is not correlated with any of the meteorological or soil
parameters.
6.95 6.7
5.4
6.9
4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
Ext
ract
yie
ld (
%)
Figure 5.13. Yield of extracts in locations
Table 5.23. Locational variations in the yield of extract
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation
t Statistical Inference
Yield of extract 5 5.990 1.28082 10.457 P<0.01 significant
DF = 4
5.3.2.1.5. Compounds present in the chloroform extract
The GC-MS analysis of the chloroform extract of the Calotropis which is
collected from various locations has been identified to contain a complex mixture of
64 compounds (Figure 5.14 – 5.14e). They are varying from 39 (L2) to 43(L1)
compounds (Table 5.25). As per the numbers of compounds isolated the location can
be arranged as L5 (38) > L4 (40)> L1 (41) > L2 and L3 (42). The variations in the
numbers of compounds are statistically significant (Table 5.24 a)
Out of these 64 compounds 31 compounds possesses significant variations
among locations (2-Methoxy-4-vinyl phenol; Hexadecane; Tridecanoic acid, 12-
methyl-methylester; Tetradecanoic acid ; 9-Octadecyne ; n-Hexadecanoic acid ; 9-
Octadecanoic acid,methylester,(E)- ; Octacosane; A'-Neogammacer-22(29)-en-3-
122
ol,acetate,(3beta,21beta)-; 9-Octadecenamide,(Z)-; Lup-20(29)-en-3-ol,
acetate,(3beta)-; Z-12-Pentacosene; Heptacosane; Tetracosanoic acid,methyl ester;
13-Docosenamide,(Z)-; Squalene; Nonacosane; Bicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene, 3,7-
dimethyl-7-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)-8-(2,6,10-trimethyl-1,5,9-undecatrienyl)-,[1alpha,
6alpha, 7alpha,8alpha(1E,5E)]-;2,6,10,14,18,22-tetracosahexanone,2,6,10,15, 9, 23-
hexamethyl- ,(all-E)- ; Heptacosane,1-chloro-; gamma-Tocopherol ; 17-
Pentatriacontene; 2(1H)Naphthalenone,3,5,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-4,8a-dimethyl-6-(1-
methylethenyl)-; Desmosterol; gamma-Sitosterol; Pyridine-3-Carboxamide,oxime,N-
(2-trifluromethyl phenyl)- ; alpha-Amyrin ; ,4,6a,6b,8a,11,12,14b-Octamethyl-
1,4,4a,5,6,6a,6b,7,8,8a,9,10,11,12,12a,14,14a, 4b -octadecahydro-2H-picen-3-one ;
.alpha-Amyrin;12-Oleanen-3-yl acetate, (3alpha)-;9,19-Cyclolanost-24-en-3-
ol,acetate ;Urs-12-en-24-oic acid, 3-oxo-,methyl ester,(+)) (Table 5.24b ) .
The total numbers of compounds are interconnected to some of the
meteorological parameters (annual lowest temperature, seasonal and monthly mean
R.H morning, seasonal lowest R.H (morning and evening), monthly lowest R.H.
evening, seasonal and monthly total rainfall, and the numbers of rainy days) and the
soil parameters (Total nitrogen and the iron content) (Table 5.24c and 5.24d).
41
42 42
40
38
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
Figure 5.14. Numbers of compounds identified in locational samples
123
GC-MS Chromotogram for L1 GC-MS Chromotogram for L2
GC-MS Chromotogram for L3 GC-MS Chromotogram for L4
Figure 5.14a. GC MS chromatogram for locational study (L1 to L4)
125
Table 5.25. Compounds identified in the chloroform extract
S.No. Rt. Compound name L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 1 7.9 Dodecane 0.43 0.57 - 0.14 - 2 9.1 2-Methoxy-4-vinyl phenol - 0.09 - - - 3 9.7 Tetradecane 0.19 0.11 0.14 0.21 0.19 4 10.1 Caryophyllene 0.15 - - - -
5 11.1 2(4H)-Benzofuranone,5,6,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl- - - - - 0.12
6 11.5 Hexadecane 0.31 - - 0.24 - 7 13.1 Tetradecanoic acid 0.26 0.37 0.44 - 0.49 8 13.5 5-Ethylcyclopent-1-enecarboxaldehyde 0.18 0.19 0.11 0.23 0.18
9 13.8 Bicyclo[3.1.1]heptane,2,6,6-trimethyl-,(1.alpha.,2.beta.,5.alpha.) 0.23 0.43 0.47 0.28 1.09
10 14.2 9-Octadecyne 0.15 0.62 0.28 0.28 1.16 11 14.8 Hexadecanoic acid,methyl ester 0.15 0.23 - - - 12 15.3 n-Hexadecanoic acid 4.95 6.57 4.34 2.68 6.76 13 16.7 9-Octadecanoic acid,methylester,(E)- - 0.48 - - 0.35 14 16.8 Phytol 1.45 0.76 0.94 0.56 1.79 15 17.3 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid,(Z,Z,Z)- 2.58 4.37 1.58 0.55 3.42 16 17.5 Olean-12-ene,3-methoxy-,(3.beta.)- 0.66 - 0.67 - - 17 17.5 2-Methyl-Z,Z-3,13-octadecadienol - - - - 0.68 18 17.7 Dodecanamide 1.27 - 0.46 0.34 - 19 17.8 Hexadecanamide - 0.76 0.51 - 0.44 20 18.7 12-Oleanen-3-yl acetate, (3.alpha.)- - - 1.47 - - 21 19.2 Octacosane 1.86 1.35 0.71 - 0.5
22 19.5 A'-Neogammacer-22(29)-en-3-ol,acetate,(3.beta.,21.beta.)- 1.19 - 1.09 1.55 1.24
23 20 9-Octadecenamide,(Z)- 3.08 2.78 2.31 3.99 4.24 24 20.4 Urs-20-en-3-ol,(3.beta.,18.alpha.,19.alpha.)- 0.96 - - 1.09 - 25 20.6 Lup-20(29)-en-3-ol,acetate,(3.beta.)- - 2.9 - 2.1 - 26 21.6 Hop-22(29)-en-3.beta.-ol 8.13 9.01 11.67 9.67 14.55
27 22.3 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, mono(2-ethylhexyl)ester - - 0.21 - -
28 23 Oxirane,2,2-dimethyl-3-(3,7,12,16,20-pentamethyl-3,7,11,15,19-Heneicosapentaenyl)-,(all-E)-
- 0.25 - - -
29 23.1 11,13-Dimethyl-12-tetradecen-1-ol acetate - - 0.71 - - 30 23.2 Nonadecane,1-chloro- - 1.06 0.82 - - 31 24.2 Z-12-Pentacosene 0.73 0.19 0.09 - 0.19 32 24.6 Heptacosane 0.33 0.62 0.44 0.17 0.59 33 25.6 13-Docosenamide,(Z)- 0.08 0.21 - 0.14 0.18 34 26 Squalene 0.9 1.24 1.45 0.97 2.14 35 26.9 Z-14-Nonacosane - 1.98 - 1.84 2.69 36 27.2 Nonacosane 2.37 1.96 6.37 1.88 2.27
37 27.4 Tricyclo[4.3.0.0(7,9)]nonane, 2,2,5,5,8,8-hexamethyl-,(1.alpha.,6.beta., 7.alpha.,9.alpha.)- 0.29 - - 1.49 0.49
38 27.6 Bicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene, 3,7-dimethyl-7-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)-8-(2,6,10-trimethyl-1,5,9-undecatrienyl)-
1.09 1.33 2.4 - 0.87
126
,[1.alpha.,6.alpha.,7.beta.,8.alpha.(1E,5E)]-
39 28.1 2,6,10,14,18,22-tetracosahexanone,2,6,10,15,9,23-hexamethyl-,(all-E)- - - - 0.89 -
40 28.6 Heptacosane,1-chloro- 0.43 0.43 0.77 0.37 0.47 41 29.4 gamma-Tocopherol 0.23 0.16 0.32 - 0.25 42 30 17-Pentatriacontene 0.13 0.37 0.34 - 0.25 43 30.4 Tricosane 4.63 4.81 6.18 5.17 5.35 44 30.8 Vitamin E 2.42 1.53 2.02 1.47 2.8 45 30.9 Olean-12-ene 1.79 - - - -
46 31 2(1H)Naphthalenone,3,5,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-4,8a-dimethyl-6-(1-methylethenyl)- - 4.04 - 3.25 -
47 32.6 Campesterol 1.78 1.91 2.16 1.57 1.83 48 33.2 Stigmasterol 1.06 1.79 1.35 1.09 1.4
49 34.1 Ergost-8,24(28)-dien-3-ol,4,14-dimethyl-,(3.beta.,4.alpha.,5.alpa.,)- 0.56 - - 0.59 -
50 34.7 Stigmasterol,22,23-dihydro- - - - 1.7 1.74 51 34.8 gamma-Sitosterol 2.76 3.35 2.14 - - 52 34.9 Heneicosane,11-decyl- - - 1.21 0.89 0.92
53 35.1 Pyridine-3-Carboxamide,oxime,N-(2-trifluromethyl phenyl)- - 1.47 1.8 2.53 0.98
54 35.2 Stigmasta-5,24(28)-dien-3-ol,(3.beta.,24Z)- 1.71 - - - - 56 35.7 .beta.-Amyrin 3.78 3.17 6.61 4.2 4.31
57 36 4,4,6a,6b,8a,11,12,14b-Octamethyl-1,4,4a,5,6,6a,6b,7,8,8a,9,10,11,12,12a,14,14a,14b-octadecahydro-2H-picen-3-one
0.49 0.67 - 0.98 -
58 36.5 4,22-Stigmastadiene-3-one - 1.37 1.38 1.68 2.33 59 37 .alpha-Amyrin 12.36 8.8 12.65 13.67 11.7660 37.8 9,19-Cyclolanost-24-en-3-ol,acetate,(3.beta.)- - - 0.67 - - 61 38.4 12-Oleanen-3-yl acetate, (3.alpha.)- 12.75 4.37 7.55 10.16 7 62 38.7 9,19-Cyclolanost-24-en-3-ol,acetate 2.18 0.81 1.5 1.98 1.37 63 39.9 Urs-12-en-24-oic acid, 3-oxo-,methyl ester,(+)- 16.97 18.95 9.84 15.11 9.24 64 40.2 Taraxasterol - 1.15 1.83 2.3 1.38
Table 5.25a. Variations in the numbers of compounds identified in locations
through GC-MS (One sample t - test)
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Significance
Total Numbers of compounds 5 41.00 1.581 57.983 P<0.01
significant DF=4
Table 5.25b. Locational variation in the composition of chloroform extract (One
sample t - test)
S.No. Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Significance
1 Dodecane 5 .2280 .25956 1.964 P>0.05Not significant
127
2 2-Methoxy-4-vinyl phenol 5 .02 .040 1.000 P<0.05significant
3 Tetradecane 5 .1680 .04147 9.058 P>0.05Not significant
4 phenol, 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl) 5 .0300 .06708 1.000
P>0.05Not significant
5 2(4H)-Benzofuranone,5,6,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl- 5 .02 .054 1.000
P>0.05Not significant
6 Hexadecane 5 .1100 .15264 1.611 P<0.05 significant.
7 Tridecanoic acid, 12-methyl-methylester 5 .3120 .19460 3.585
P<0.05 significant.
8 Tetradecanoic acid 5 .1780 .04324 9.204 P<0.05 significant.
9 5-Ethylcyclopent-1-enecarboxaldehyde 5 .5000 .34467 3.244
P>0.05Not significant
10 Bicyclo[3.1.1]heptane,2,6,6-trimethyl-,(1alpha,2alpha,5alpha) 5 .4980 .40905 2.722
P>0.05Not significant
11 9-Octadecyne 5 .0760 .10784 1.576 P<0.05 significant
12 Hexadecanoic acid,methyl ester 5 5.060 1.68560 6.712 P>0.05 Not significant
13 n-Hexadecanoic acid 5 .17 .232 1.601 P<0.05 significant
14 9-Octadecanoic acid,methylester,(E)- 5 1.100 .50779 4.844
P<0.05 significant
15 Phytol 5 2.500 1.49988 3.727 P>0.05 Not significant
16 Octadecanoic acid,methyl ester 5 .2660 .36425 1.633 P>0.05 Not significant
17 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid,(Z,Z,Z)- 5 .14 .304 1.000
P>0.05 Not significant
18 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid(z,z)- 5 .4140 .52037 1.779 P>0.05 Not significant
19 Dodecanamide 5 .34 .334 2.289 P>0.05 Not significant
20 Hexadecanamide 5 .29 .657 1.000 P>0.05 Not significant
21 Octacosane 5 .8840 .72954 2.709 P<0.05 significant
22 A'-Neogammacer-22(29)-en-3-ol,acetate,(3beta,21beta)- 5 1.014 .59231 3.828
P<0.05 significant
23 9-Octadecenamide,(Z)- 5 3.280 .81495 9.000 P<0.05 significant
24 Urs-20-en-3-ol,(3alpha,18alpha,19alpha)- 5 .4100 .56329 1.628
P>0.05 Not significant
25 Lup-20(29)-en-3-ol, acetate,(3beta)- 5 1.00 1.398 1.599
P<0.05 significant
26 Hop-22(29)-en-3alpha-ol 5 10.61 2.56130 9.259 P>0.05 Not significant
27 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, mono(2-ethylhexyl)ester 5 .04 .094 1.000
P>0.05 Not significant
28 Nonadecane,1-chloro- 5 .05 .112 1.000 P>0.05Not
128
significant
29 Ergost-22-en-3-0l,(3alpha,5alpha,22E,24R)- 5 .14 .318 1.000
P>0.05Not significant
30 Stigmastane-3,6-dione,(5alpha) 5 .38 .522 1.611 P>0.05Not significant
31 Z-12-Pentacosene 5 .2400 .28513 1.882 P<0.05 significant
32 Heptacosane 5 .4300 .18668 5.151 P<0.05 significant
33 Tetracosanoic acid,methyl ester 5 .00 .000a 3.256 P<0.05 significant
34 13-Docosenamide,(Z)- 5 .1220 .08379 6.015 P<0.01 significant
35 Squalene 5 1.340 .4981 2.364 P<0.05 significant
36 Z-14-Nonacosane 5 1.30 1.231 3.474 P>0.05 Not significant
37 Nonacosane 5 2.970 1.91169 1.650 P<0.01 significant
38 Tricyclo[4.3.0.0(7,9)]nonane, 2,2,5,5,8,8-hexamethyl-,(1alpha,6beta, 7alpha,9alpha)-
5 .4540 .61517 2.939 P>0.05 Not significant
39
Bicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene, 3,7-dimethyl-7-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)-8-(2,6,10-trimethyl-1,5,9-undecatrienyl)-,[1alpha,6alpha,7alpha,8alpha(1E,5E)]-
5 1.138 .86583 1.000 P<0.05 significant
40 2,6,10,14,18,22-tetracosahexanone,2,6,10,15,9,23-hexamethyl-,(all-E)-
5 .18 .398 6.975 P<0.05 significant
41 Heptacosane,1-chloro- 5 .4940 .15837 3.533 P<0.01 significant
42 gamma-Tocopherol 5 .1920 .12153 3.175 P<0.05 significant
43 17-Pentatriacontene 5 .2180 .15353 19.370 P<0.05 significant
44 Tricosane 5 5.228 .60351 8.011 P>0.05 Not significant
45 Vitamin E 5 2.048 .57164 1.000 P>0.05 Not significant
46 2(1H)Naphthalenone,3,5,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-4,8a-dimethyl-6-(1-methylethenyl)-
5 .3580 .80051 1.617 P<0.05 significant
47 Desmosterol 5 1.46 2.016 19.319 P<0.05 significant
48 Campesterol 5 1.8500
.21413 10.157 P>0.05 Not significant
49 Stigmasterol 5 1.3380
.29457 1.632 P>0.05 Not significant
50 Ergost-8,24(28)-dien-3-ol,4,14-dimethyl- 5 .00 .000a 1.633
P>0.05 Not significant
129
,(3alpha,4alpha,5.alpa.,)-
51 Stigmasterol,22,23-dihydro- 5 .2300 .31512 2.356 P>0.05 Not significant
52 gamma-Sitosterol 5 .69 .942 2.389 P<0.05 significant
53 Heneicosane,11-decyl- 5 1.6500
1.56582 3.210 P>0.05 Not significant
54 Pyridine-3-Carboxamide,oxime,N-(2-trifluromethyl phenyl)-
5 .60 .565 1.000 P<0.05 significant
56 Stigmasta-5,24(28)-dien-3-ol,(3alpha,24Z)- 5 1.36 .945 7.554
P>0.05 Not significant
57 alpha-Amyrin 5 .3420 .76474 2.235 P<0.01 significant
58
4,4,6a,6b,8a,11,12,14b-Octamethyl-1,4,4a,5,6,6a,6b,7,8,8a,9,10,11,12,12a,14,14a,14b-octadecahydro-2H-picen-3-one
5 4.414 1.30657 3.555 P<0.05 significant
59 4,22-Stigmastadiene-3-one 5 .4280 .42822 14.409 P>0.05 Not significant
60 alpha-Amyrin 5 1.35 .850 1.000 P<0.05 significant
61 12-Oleanen-3-yl acetate, (3alpha)- 5 11.85 1.83869 5.848
P<0.01 significant
62 9,19-Cyclolanost-24-en-3-ol,acetate 5 .13 .300 6.503
P<0.01 significant
63 Urs-12-en-24-oic acid, 3-oxo-,methyl ester,(+)- 5 8.366 3.19913 7.264
P<0.01 significant
64 Taraxasterol 5 1.568 .53914 3.442 P>0.05Not significant
Table 5.25c. Karl Pearson correlation between meteorological parameters and
variations in the total numbers of compounds
Numbers of compounds vs. Correlation value Statistical inference Annual Lowest Temperature .882* P<0.05 significant Seasonal Mean R.H.morning .890* P<0.05 significant Monthly Mean R.H.mornin .887* P<0.05 significant Seasonal Lowest R.H.morning -.958* P<0.05 significant
Seasonal Lowest R.H. evening -.999** P<0.01 significant
Monthly Lowest R.H. evening -.996** P<0.01 significant
Seasonal Total rainfall(mm) .936* P<0.05 significant Monthly total rainfall(mm) .962** P<0.01 significant Numbers of rainy days per season (2.5mm and above) -.907* P<0.05 significant
N=5
130
Table 5. 25d. Karl Pearson correlation between soil parameters and variations in
the total numbers of compounds
Numbers of compounds vs.soil parameters
Correlation value Statistical inference
Total Nitrogen (%) .906* P<0.05 significant Iron (ppm) .911* P<0.05 significant
N=5
5.3.2.1.6. Groups of chemical
The total numbers of compounds identified (64) belong to the families of
terpenes, sterols, fatty acids, hydrocarbons, heterocyclic compounds, phenolics and
hydroxylamines (Table 5.26). The terpenes are the major group of compound among
the identified ones.
Table 5.26. Chemical groups
Compound group L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
Terpenes 13*(61.81**) 11*(42.5**) 11*(56.26**) 13*(62.44**) 9*(54.53**)
Sterols 6*(10.06**) 5*(11.38**) 8*(9.2**) 6*(8.61**) 5*(8.67**)
Fatty acids 8*(12.52**) 8*(15.63**) 8*(10.49**) 7*(8.87**) 8*(17.28**)
Hydrocarbons 2*(12.97**) 14*(19.01**) 12*(19.79**) 12*(15.88**) 12*(14.96**)
Heterocyclic compounds 2*(2.65**) 2*(2.08**) 2*(2.34**) 2*(1.47**) 3*(3.17**)
Phenolics - 1*(0.10**) - - -
Hydroxylamines - 1*(1.81**) 1*(1.80**) 1*(2.52**) 1*(0.98**)
(* Total number; ** tentative Quantity)
5.3.2.1.7. Terpenoids
There are 17 compounds identified in the locational samples. They are of to
five types (1. Monoterpene, 2. Diterpenes, 3. Sesquiterpene 4. Triterpenes, 5.
Pentacyclic Triterpenes). Based on the numbers of compounds the locations can be
descendingly arranged as L1 (14)>L4 (13)>L3 (12)> L2 (11)>L5 (10). According to
the quantity of the phytochemicals the descending order of the locations is
L4 (62.44)>L1 (61.81)>L3 (56.26)>L5 (54.53)>L2 (42.5)
131
The 12-Oleanen-3-yl acetate, (3.alpha.) is found only in hilly terrain and
Caryophyllene is identified only in the coastal tract. The variations in the numbers of
compound and the quantity are statistically significant (Table 5.27a).
The variation in the numbers of compounds are associated with the soil
parameters (soil organic carbon and the organic matter) and not associated with any of
the meteorological elements (Table 5.27b). The quantity of the terpenoids is
associated with the meteorological elements of relative humidity only (Table 5.27c).
Table 5.27.Terpenoids S.no. Compounds name L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
MONOTERPENES
1. Bicyclo[3.1.1]heptane,2,6,6-trimethyl-,(1alpha ,2beta 5alpha) 0.23 0.43 0.47 0.28 1.09
DITERPENES (ACYCLIC) 2. Phytol 1.45 0.76 0.94 0.56 1.79 SESQUITERPENE 3. Caryophyllene 0.15 - - - -
TRITERPENES
4. Olean-12-ene 1.79 - - - -
5. Urs-12-en-24-oic acid, 3-oxo-,methyl ester,(+)- 16.97 18.95 9.84 15.11 9.24
6. Hop-22(29)-en-3.beta.-ol 8.13 9.01 11.67 9.67 14.557. Squalene 0.9 1.24 1.45 0.97 2.14 8. Taraxasterol - 1.15 1.83 2.3 1.38
9. A'-Neogammacer-22(29)-en-3-ol,acetate,(3.beta.,21.beta.)- 1.19 - 1.09 1.55 1.24
10. Olean-12-ene,3-methoxy-,(3.beta.)- 0.66 - 0.67 - -
11. Oxirane,2,2-dimethyl-3-(3,7,12,16,20-pentamethyl-3,7,11,15,19-Heneicosapentaenyl)-,(all-E)-
- 0.25 - - -
PENTACYCLIC TRITERPENE 12. Alpha-Amyrin 12.36 8.8 12.65 13.67 11.7613. Beta-Amyrin 3.78 3.17 6.61 4.2 4.31 14. Lup-20(29)-en-3-ol,acetate,(3.beta.)- - 2.9 - 2.1 - 15. 12-Oleanen-3-yl acetate, (3.alpha.)- - - 1.47 10.16 -
16. Urs-20-en-3-ol,(3.beta.,18.alpha.,19.alpha.)- 0.96 - - 1.09 -
17.
Beta-Amyrene derivatives-4,4,6a,6b,8a,11,12,14b-Octamethyl-1,4,4a,5,6,6a, 6b,7,8,8a,9, 10,11,12,12a, 14, 14a,14b - octadecahydro-2H-picen-3-one
0.49 0.67 - 0.98 -
132
Table 5.27a. Seasonal variations in the number and quantity of terpenoids
(One sample t - test)
Parameter N Mean Std.
Deviation t Statistical inference
Numbers of Terpenes
5 12.00 1.581 16.971 P<0.01 significant
quantity of Terpenes
5 55.4920
8.02332 15.465 P<0.01 significant
DF=4
Table 5.27b. Karl Pearson correlation between numbers of terpenoids and soil
parameters
Numbers of terpenes vs. Soil parameters
Correlation value Statistical inference
Organic Carbon (%) .924* P<0.05 significant Organic Matter (%) .924* P<0.05 significant
N=5
Table 5.27c. Karl Pearson correlation between quantity of terpenoids and
meteorological parameters
Quantity of terpenes vs.
Meteorological parameters Correlation value Statistical inference
Annual Mean R.H. morning .927* P<0.05 significant Monthly Mean R.H. morning .890* P<0.05 significant Annual Highest R.H. morning -.905* P<0.05 significant
Seasonal Highest R.H. morning .917* P<0.05 significant
Monthly Highest R.H. morning .917* P<0.05 significant
N=5
5.3.2.1.8. Hydrocarbons
In the locational comparison, 18 hydrocarbons are identified (Table 5.28). But
for L2 (13 compounds) other location possess 12 compounds. According to the
quantity they can be arranged as L3 (19.79) > L2 (19.01)>L4 (15.88) > L5 (14.96)>
L1 (12.97). Bicyclo [4.2.0] oct-2-ene,3, 7-dimethyl- 7- (4-methyl-3-pentenyl) -8-
(2,6,10-trimethyl-1,5,9-undecatrienyl) -, [1alpha., alpha, 7beta, 8.alpha (1E,5E)]-; 1,2-
Benzenedicarboxylic acid, mono(2-ethylhexyl) ester ; is present only in the riverine
zone. The locational variation in the hydrocarbon is statistically significant (Table
133
5.28a). The variations in the number is associated with the meteorological parameter
of Annual Mean R.H. morning (Table 5.28b) and the soil parameters of nitrogen,
phosphorous, iron, zinc and copper (Table 5.28c) . The quantity is related to the soil
sodium (Table 5.28d) and it is not associated with any of the meteorological elements.
Table 5.28. Locational variations in the Hydrocarbons
S.no. Compound L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
1.
Bicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene, 3,7-dimethyl-7-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)-8-(2,6,10-trimethyl-1,5,9-undecatrienyl)-,[1.alpha.,6.alpha.,7.beta.,8.alpha.(1E,5E)]-
1.09 1.33 2.4 - 0.87
2. Tricyclo[4.3.0.0(7,9)]nonane, 2,2,5,5,8,8-hexamethyl-,(1.alpha.,6.beta., 7.alpha.,9.alpha.)-
0.29 - - 1.49 0.49
3. 2(1H)Naphthalenone,3,5,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-4,8a-dimethyl-6-(1-methylethenyl)-
- 4.04 - 3.25 -
ALKANES 4. Tricosane 4.63 4.81 6.18 5.17 5.35 5. Nonacosane 2.37 1.96 6.37 1.88 2.27 6. Hexadecane 0.31 - - 0.24 - 7. Tetradecane 0.19 0.11 0.14 0.21 0.19 8. Dodecane 0.43 0.57 - 0.14 - 9. Z-14-Nonacosane - 1.98 - 1.84 2.69 10. Octacosane 1.86 1.35 0.71 - 0.5 11. 17-Pentatriacontene 0.13 0.37 0.34 - 0.25 12. Heneicosane,11-decyl- - - 1.21 0.89 0.92 CHLORINATED 13. Nonadecane,1-chloro- - 1.06 0.82 - - 14. Heptacosane,1-chloro 0.43 0.43 0.77 0.37 0.47 ALKENES 15. Z-12-Pentacosene 0.73 0.19 0.09 - 0.19 DICARBOXYLIC ACIDS 16. Heptacosane 0.33 0.62 0.44 0.17 0.59 CYCLOPENTANES 17. 5-Ethylcyclopent-1-enecarboxaldehyde 0.18 0.19 0.11 0.23 0.18
CARBOCYCLIC ACIDS PTHALIC ACIDS
18. 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, mono(2-ethylhexyl) ester - - 0.21 - -
134
Table 5.28a. Locational variations in the numbers and quantity of the
Hydrocarbons (One sample t - test)
DF = 4
Table 5.28b. Karl Pearson correlation between meteorological parameters
and numbers of the hydrocarbons
Parameters Correlation value Statistical inference
Annual Mean R.H. morning .889* P<0.05 significant
N=5
Table 5.28c. Karl Pearson correlation between soil parameters and the
numbers of hydrocarbons
Parameters Correlation value Statistical inference
Total Nitrogen (%) .895* P<0.05 significant
Total Phosphorous (%) .980** P<0.01 significant
Iron .928* P<0.05 significant
Zinc .950* P<0.05 significant
Copper .929* P<0.05 significant
Table 5.28d. Karl Pearson correlation between soil parameters and quantity
of the hydrocarbons
Parameters Correlation value Statistical inference
Total Sodium (%) 893* P<0.05 significant
5.3.2.1.9. Fatty acids
The locational samples consist of 13 fatty acids (Table 5.29). Except L4 (7-
compounds) all the other locations possesses 8 compounds. The maximum quantity is
present in L5 (17.28) and the minimum is present in the L4 (8.87). According to the
quantity they can be descendingly arranged as L5 (17.28) >L2 (15.63) >L1 (12.52)
>L3 (10.49) >L4 (8.87). The Tetracosanoic acid, methyl ester, Hexadecanamide,
Parameter N Mean Std.
Deviation t Statistical inference
Numbers of Hydrocarbons
5 12.40 .894 31.000 P<0.01 significant
Quantity of Hydrocarbons
5 16.7240
2.56771 14.564 P<0.01 significant
135
11,13-Dimethyl-12-tetradecen-1-ol acetate are present only in riverine zone;
2,6,10,14,18,22-tetracosahexanone, 2,6,10,15,9,23- hexamethyl-, (all-E)- appear only
in terrestrial – rural stretch.
The locational variations found in the fatty acids are statistically significant
(Table 5.29a). The numbers of compounds is associated only with the soil parameters
of total potassium. The quantity is associated neither with climate nor soil parameters
(Table 5.29b).
Table 5.29. Fatty acids
S.No. Compound L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 UNSATURATED
1. 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid,(Z,Z,Z)- 2.58 4.37 1.58 0.55 3.42
MONOUNSATURATED 2. 9-Octadecenamide,(Z)- 3.08 2.78 2.31 3.99 4.24 Erucic Acid 3. 13-Docosenamide,(Z)- 0.08 0.21 - 0.14 0.18 LINOLEIC ACIDS PALMITIC ACIDS 4 Hexadecanamide -- - 0.37 - - 5 n-Hexadecanoic acid 4.95 6.57 4.34 2.68 6.76 ESTERS, methyl 6 Hexadecanoic acid,methyl ester 0.15 0.23 - - - MYRSITIC ACIDS 7 Tetradecanoic acid 0.26 0.37 0.44 - 0.49 LAURIC ACIDS 8 Dodecanamide 1.27 - 0.46 0.34 -
STEARIC ACIDS ESTERS
9 9-Octadecanoic acid,methylester,(E)- - 0.48 - - 0.35
Omega-3 Derivatives Docosahexaenoic Acids
10 2,6,10,14,18,22-tetracosahexanone,2,6,10,15,9,23-hexamethyl-,(all-E)-
- - - 0.89 -
FATTY ALCOHOLS 11 2-Methyl-Z,Z-3,13-octadecadienol - - - - 0.68
12 11,13-Dimethyl-12-tetradecen-1-ol acetate - - 0.71 - -
POLYMERIC FATTY ACIDS 13 9-Octadecyne 0.15 0.62 0.28 0.28 1.16
136
Table 5.29a. Locational variations in the numbers and quantity of the Fatty acids
(One sample t - test)
DF= 4
Table 5.29b. Karl Pearson correlation between soil parameters and numbers of
fatty acids
Parameters Correlation value Statistical inference
Total Potassium (%) .925* P<0.05 significant
5.3.2.1.10. Sterol composition
There are 12 sterols identified in the locational samples (Table 5.30). The
location sample 1, L3, and L4 possess 6 compounds and the others possess 5
compounds. As per their quantity the descending order is as follows L2 (11.38)> L1
(10.06)>L3 (9.2)>L5 (8.67)> L4 (8.61). The following compounds are present in any
one location only 9, 19-Cyclolanost-24-en-3-ol, acetate, (3.beta.)-,
Desmosterol,Stigmasta-5,24(28)-dien-3-ol,(3.beta.,24Z)-,Ergost-22-en-3-l, (3beta,
5alpha, 22E, 24R)- (riverine zone ); stigmasterol, 22, 23 – dihydro - (coastal tract).
The locational variations among the sterol compounds are qualitatively and
quantitatively statistically significant (Table 5.30a). The quantities of the sterol
compounds are associated only with the meteorological elements such as seasonal
lowest temperature and the annual lowest R.H. morning. The number of the
compounds is not associated with the meteorological elements and the soil parameters
(Table 5.30b).
Table 5.30. Sterol composition
S.no. Compound L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 1. 9,19-Cyclolanost-24-en-3-ol,acetate 2.18 0.81 1.5 1.98 1.37 2. 9,19-Cyclolanost-24-en-3-ol,acetate,(3.beta.)- - - 0.67 - - PHYTOSTEROLS 3. Campesterol 1.78 1.91 2.16 1.57 1.83
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical inference
Numbers of Fatty acids 5 8.00 .707 25.298 P<0.01 significant
Quantity of Fatty acids 5 13.32
80 4.68214 6.365 P<0.05 significant
137
4. Stigmasterol 1.06 1.79 1.35 1.09 1.4 5. gamma-Sitosterol 2.76 3.35 2.14 - - 6 Stigmasterol,22,23-dihydro- - - - 1.7 1.74 CHOLESTEROLS -(Dehydrocholesterols) 7. Desmosterol - - 0.2 - STIGMASTEROLS Analogs/Derivatives 8. Stigmasta-5,24(28)-dien-3-ol,(3.beta.,24Z)- - - 2.04 - - 9. 4,22-Stigmastadiene-3-one 1.69 0.89 - 1.68 1.69
ERGOSTEROLS Analogs/Derivatives (Withanolides)
10. Ergost-22-en-3-0l,(3.beta.,5.alpha.,22E,24R)- - - 0.32 - -
11. Ergost-8,24(28)-dien-3-ol,4,14-dimethyl-,(3.beta.,4.alpha.,5.alpa.,)- 0.56 - - 0.59 -
Table 5.30a. Locational variations in the numbers and quantity of the Sterols
(One sample t - test)
DF= 4
Table 5. 30b. Karl Pearson correlation between meteorological elements and
quantity of sterols
Parameters Correlation value Statistical inference
Seasonal Lowest Temperature .894* P<0.05 significant
Annual Lowest R.H. morning -.980** P<0.01 significant
DF= 4
5.3.2.1.11. Heterocyclic Compounds
There are three heterocyclic compounds present in the locational samples. L5
possesses all the three compounds and the other locations possess two compounds.
The quantity of the compound ranges between 2.65(L1) to 3.17(L5). 2(4H)-
Benzofuranone, 5, 6, 7, 7a-tetrahydro-4, 4,7a-trimethyl- is present only in the sample
L5- terrestrial urban area (Table 5.31). The locational variations among these
compounds are significant (Table 5.31a). The variation in the numbers is correlated
with potassium content of the soil (Table 5.31b). The quantity is associated with pH
and potassium content of the soil (Table 5.31c).
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical inference Numbers of Sterols 5 5.60 .548 22.862 P<0.01 significant Quantity of Sterols 5 9.5840 1.16014 18.472 P<0.05 significant
138
Table 5.31. Heterocyclic compounds
S.no. Compound L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 BENZOPYRANS 1. Vitamin E 2.42 1.53 2.02 1.47 2.8
2. 2(4H)-Benzofuranone,5,6,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl- - - - - 0.12
TOCOPHEROLS 3. gamma-Tocopherol 0.23 0.16 0.32 - 0.25
Table 5.31a. Locational variations in the numbers and quantity of the Heterocyclic
compounds (One sample t - test)
DF= 4
Table 5.31b. Karl Pearson correlation between soil parameters and number of
heterocyclic compounds
Parameters Correlation value Statistical inference
Total Potassium (%) .925* P<0.05 significant
N=5
Table 5.31c. Karl Pearson correlation between soil parameters and number of
heterocyclic compounds
Parameters Correlation value Statistical inference pH .892* P<0.05 significant Total Potassium (%) .996** P<0.01 significant
N=5
5.3.2.1.12. Phenolics
Only one phenolic compound and hydroxyl amine are identified in the
locational samples (Table 5.32 and 5.33). The phenolic compound is found only in the
hilly terrain. The hydroxyl amine is found in all the locations except L1.The quantity
is 0 (L1) to 2.53 (L4). The variation in this compound is not associated with the
meteorological elements. The quantity of the hydroxylamine is correlated with the pH
of the soil (Table 5.33a).
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation
t Statistical inference
Numbers of Heterocyclic compounds
5 2.00 .707 6.325 P<0.01 significant
Quantity of Heterocyclic compounds
5 2.3420
.63433 8.256 P<0.01 significant
139
Table 5.32. Phenolics and hydroxylamine
S.no. Compound L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 Phenolics - Catechols 1 2-Methoxy-4-vinyl phenol - 0.09 - - -
Table 5.33. Hydroxylamine
S.no. Compound L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
Hydroxylamine- Oximes
2 Pyridine-3-Carboxamide,oxime,N-(2-trifluromethyl phenyl)- - 1.47 1.8 2.53 0.98
Table 5.33 a. Karl Pearson correlation between soil parameters and quantity of
hydroxylamines compounds
Parameters Correlation value Statistical inference
pH -.941* P<0.05 significant
N=5
5.3.2.2. Locational variations in the inorganic compounds
5.3.2.2.1. Locational variations in the ash content
The ash composition is high in the L5 (1.89%) and low in the L1 (1.72 %)
(Figure 5.14). The locational variations in the ash composition are statistically
significant (Table 5.34). The variations noticed are not associated with any
meteorological and soil factors.
1.72
1.81
1.74
1.79
1.89
1.6
1.65
1.7
1.75
1.8
1.85
1.9
Ash
(%)
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
Figure 5.15. Locational variations in the ash content
140
Table 5.34. Variations in ash content (One sample t - test)
parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical inference
Ash (%) 5 1.7900 .06671 60.001 P<0.01 significant
DF=3
5.3.2.2.2. Locational variations in the essential macro nutrients
The essential macronutrients present in the plant samples collected at five
different locations show distinct variations. The figure (5.15a) exhibits the variations
in the nitrogen which is between 2.05 %( L1) to 2.18% (L2 and L4). The nitrogen is
comparatively rich in hilly terrain and the terrestrial - rural stretch and lower in L1
(coastal tract).
The figure (5.15b) shows the ranging of phosphorous between 0.53% (L4) to
0.58% (L5). The phosphorous is rich in the L5 (terrestrial-urban area) and low in L4
(the terrestrial-rural stretch). The potassium is rich in the terrestrial –rural stretch (L4)
and lower in the coastal tract (L1) (Figure 5.15c).
2.07
2.18
2.09
2.18
2.03
1.95
2
2.05
2.1
2.15
2.2
Nitr
ogen
( %
)
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
0.57
0.54
0.57
0.53
0.58
0.5
0.51
0.52
0.53
0.54
0.55
0.56
0.57
0.58
Phos
phor
ous (
% )
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
Figure 5.15a. Nitrogen Figure 5.15b. Phosphorous
3.1
3.22
3.12
3.28
3.19
3
3.05
3.1
3.15
3.2
3.25
3.3
Pota
ssiu
m (
% )
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
Figure 5.15c. Potassium
141
0.64
0.780.84
0.98
0.56
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Sulp
hur
( %
)
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
The other macronutrients, calcium, magnesium, and sulphur are depicted in
figures (5.15d to 5.15f). The variations in these compounds (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, and S)
are statistically significant (Table 5.35).
The variations found in the essential macronutrients are only associated with
the soil elements (Table 5.35 to 5.38). The nitrogen content of plant is associated with
the soil nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, sodium, iron, zinc and copper of the soil
(Table 5.36).The phosphorous content of plant is related to the pH, nitrogen,
potassium iron, zinc and copper of the soil (Table 5.37). The potassium content of
plant is correlated with the soil nitrogen, while sulphur is associated with the pH,
electrical conductivity, and potassium. The calcium and magnesium are not associated
with any of these soil parameters (Table 5.36 and 5.37).
3.64
3.94
3.79
3.643.59
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4
Cal
cium
( %
)
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
2.51
2.65
2.48
2.592.61
2.35
2.4
2.45
2.5
2.55
2.6
2.65
Mag
nesi
um (
% )
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
Figure 5.15d. Calcium Figure 5.15e. Magnesium
Figure 5.15f. Sulphur
142
Table 5.33. Seasonal variations in the essential macronutrients
(One sample t - test)
Parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical inference
Total Nitrogen (%) 5 2.1100 .06745 69.946 P<0.01
significant Total Potassium (%) 5 3.182 .0736 96.646 P<0.01
significant Total Phosphorous (%)
5 .5580 .02168 57.553 P<0.01 significant
Total Calcium (%) 5 3.7200 .14405 57.746 P<0.01
significant Total Magnesium (%)
5 2.5680 .07085 81.045 P<0.01 significant
Total Sulphur (%) 5 .7600 .16553 10.267 P<0.01
significant DF= 4
Table 5.34. Karl Pearson correlation between soil parameters and Nitrogen
Plant nitrogen vs. Correlation value Statistical inference
Total Nitrogen (%) -.927* P<0.05 significant Total Phosphorous (%) -.889* P<0.05 significant Total Potassium (%) -.952* P<0.05 significant Total Sodium (%) -.904* P<0.05 significant Iron -.936* P<0.05 significant Zinc -.970** P<0.01 significant Copper -.935* P<0.05 significant N=5
Table 5.35. Karl Pearson correlation between soil parameters and phosphorous
Plant phosphorous vs. Correlation value Statistical inference pH .903* P<0.05 significant Total Nitrogen (%) .948* P<0.05 significant Total Potassium (%) .944* P<0.05 significant Iron .945* P<0.05 significant Zinc .957* P<0.05 significant Copper .955* P<0.01 significant
Table 5.36. Karl Pearson correlation between soil parameters and potassium
Plant potassium vs. Correlation value Statistical inference Total Nitrogen (%) -.888* P<0.05 significant N=5
143
Table 5.37. Karl Pearson correlation between soil parameters and sulphur
Plant sulphur vs. Correlation value Statistical inference pH -.879* P<0.05 significant Electrical Conductivity (ds/m) -.964** P<0.05 significant
Total Potassium (%) -.934* P<0.05 significant N=5
5.3.2.2.3 Essential micro nutrients
The micronutrients show some variations among the locations 9 Figure 5.16a
to 5.16f). The Zn ranges from 2.69 ppm (coastal tract) to 2.89 (riverine zone) and the
copper is 0.57ppm (hilly terrain) to 0.81(coastal tract). The iron ranges between
106.3ppm (coastal track) and 112.6 ppm (hilly terrain). The manganese was about
10.36 ppm (hilly terrain) and 12.64 ppm (coastal tract). The boron was about 0.05
(terrestrial- rural stretch) to 0.08 ppm (hilly terrain and riverine zone). The
molybdenum was about 0.03 ppm (coastal tract) and 0.06 ppm (riverine zone and the
terrestrial-urban area).
The analysed micronutrients show significant variations between places (Table
5.37a). Zinc and molybdenum are mostly pertinent to the meteorological parameters
like temperature, R.H., and rainfall (Table 5.37b and c). The other parameters show
no relevance to the meteorological and soil parameters.
2.69
2.83
2.89
2.842.87
2.55
2.6
2.65
2.7
2.75
2.8
2.85
2.9
Zin
c (p
pm )
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
0.81
0.57 0.59 0.56
0.79
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Cop
per
( ppm
)
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 Figure 5.16a. Zinc Figure 5.16b. Copper
144
106.3
112.6
110.3 110.2
106.9
103104105106107108109110111112113
Iron
( p
pm )
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
12.64
10.36
12.49 12.36
10.48
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Man
gane
se (
ppm
)
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 Figure 5.16c. Iron Figure 5.16d. Manganese
0.070.08 0.08
0.05
0.06
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
Bor
on (
ppm
)
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
0.03
0.05
0.06
0.05
0.06
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Mol
ybde
num
( p
pm )
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
Figure 5.16e. Boron Figure 5.16f. Molybdenum
Table 5.37a. Variations in the micronutrients (One sample t - test)
parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical inference
Total zinc (ppm) 5 2.824 .07861 80.326 P<0.01 significant Total copper (ppm) 5 .6640 .12482 11.895 P<0.01 significant Total iron (ppm) 5 109.260 2.6197 93.259 P<0.01 significant Total manganese (ppm) 5 11.6660 1.14253 22.832 P<0.01 significant Total boron (ppm) 5 .0680 .01304 11.662 P<0.01 significant Total molybdenum (ppm) 5 .0500 .01225 9.129 P<0.01significant
DF=4
Table 5.37b. Karl Pearson correlation between Meteorological parameters and
Zinc
Parameters Correlation value Statistical inference
Annual mean maximum temperature 953* P<0.05 significant Seasonal mean maximum temperature 945* P<0.05 significant
Monthly mean maximum temperature .903* P<0.05 significant
Annual mean minimum temperature .973** P<0.01 significant
145
Seasonal mean minimum temperature .967** P<0.01 significant
Monthly mean minimum temperature .973** P<0.01 significant
Annual highest temperature .973** P<0.01 significant
Seasonal highest temperature .960 P<0.05 significant
Monthly lowest temperature -.895* P<0.05 significant
Annual mean R.H.evening -954* P<0.05 significant
Seasonal mean R.H.morning -963** P<0.01 significant
Monthly mean R.H.evening 963** P<0.01 significant
Seasonal highest R.H. evening 973** P<0.01 significant
Monthly highest R.H. evening 949* P<0.05 significant
Seasonal lowest R.H. evening -.943* P<0.05 significant
Monthly lowest.R.H. Evening -.931* P<0.05 significant
Seasonal total rainfall(mm) .963** P<0.01 significant Number of rainy days per season (2.5mm and above) 949* P<0.05 significant
N=5
Table 5.37c. Karl Pearson correlation between Metereological parameters and
Molybdenym
Molybdenym vs. Correlation value Statistical inference
Annual mean maximum temperature .913* P<0.05 significant Seasonal mean maximum temperature .904* P<0.05 significant
Annual mean minimum temperature .943* P<0.05 significant
Seasonal mean minimum temperature .930* P<0.05 significant
Monthly mean minimum temperature .939* P<0.05 significant
Annual highest temperature .943* P<0.05 significant
Seasonal highesttemperature .922* P<0.05 significant
Monthly lowest temperature -.882** P<0.01 significant
Annual mean R.H.evening -.914* P<0.05 significant
Seasonal mean R.H.morning -.925* P<0.05 significant
Monthly mean R.H.evening -.926 P<0.05 significant
Seasonal highest R.H. evening -.973** P<0.01 significant
Monthly highest R.H. evening -.949* P<0.05 significant
Seasonal lowest R.H. evening -.902* P<0.05 significant
146
Monthly lowest R.H. evening -.888* P<0.05 significant
Seasonal total rainfall(mm) .937* P<0.05 significant Numbers of rainy days per season (2.5mm and above) -.927* P<0.05 significant
N=5
5.3.2.2.4. Locational variations in the nonessential element
Among the nonessential elements analysed Cr is high (0.005 mg/g) in
terrestrial-rural stretch and low (0.002 mg/g) in the coastal tract. The Ni is 0.02 mg/ g
(coastal tract and terrestrial – urban area) to 0.05 mg/ g. The Cd is about 0.02 (hilly
terrain) to 0.04 coastal tract mg/g. The Pb was about 0.12mg/g (terrestrial –urban
area) to 0.16 (coastal tract and terrestrial-rural stretch). The Co is about 0.02 mg/ g
(terrestrial-urban area) to) 0.06 mg/g (riverine zone). Except terrestrial-rural stretch
(0.002) all other samples contain equal mercury (0.001mg/ g). The silver is about 0.02
mg/ g (coastal tract) to 0.06 mg/ g (terrestrial rural stretch). The selenium is present in
very high level. It is about 0.52 (riverine zone) to 0.59 mg/ g (coastal tract).The
arsenic and cyanide are not present in any samples (Figures 5.17a to 5.17h).
The nonessential elements show (except cadmium) no correlation among the
meteorological and the soil parameters. The cadmium is correlated to the temperature
and the R.H., rainfall and wind speed (Table 5.38).
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.003
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0.002
0.0025
0.003
0.0035
0.004
0.0045
0.005
Chr
omiu
m (m
g / g
)
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
0.02
0.05
0.03
0.04
0.02
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
0.045
0.05
Nic
kel
( mg
/g )
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
Figure 5.17a.Chromium Figure 5.17b.Nickel
147
0.04
0.02
0.03 0.03 0.03
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
Cad
miu
m (
mg
/g )
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
0.16
0.13
0.150.16
0.12
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
Lea
d ( m
g / g
)
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
Figure 5.17c.Cadmium Figure 5.17d. Lead
0.05
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.02
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Cob
alt (
mg
/ g )
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
0.001 0.001 0.001
0.002
0.001
0
0.0002
0.0004
0.0006
0.0008
0.001
0.0012
0.0014
0.0016
0.0018
0.002
Mer
cury
( m
g / g
)
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
Figure 5.17e. Cobalt Figure 5.17f. Mercury
0.02
0.03 0.03
0.06
0.03
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Silv
er (
mg
/ g )
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
0.59
0.54
0.52
0.57
0.53
0.48
0.5
0.52
0.54
0.56
0.58
0.6
Sele
nium
( m
g / g
)
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
Figure 5.17g. Silver Figure 5.17h. Selenium
Table 5.38a. Variations in the nonessential elements (One sample t - test)
parameter N Mean Std. Deviation t Statistical
inference Total chromium 5 .0034 .001140 6.668 P<0.01 significant Total Nickel 5 .0320 .01304 5.488 P<0.01 significant Total Cadmium 5 .0300 .00707 9.487 P<0.01 significant Total lead 5 .1440 .01817 17.725 P<0.01 significant Total Cobalt 5 .0400 .01581 5.657 P<0.01 significant Total Mercury 5 .0012 .000447 6.000 P<0.01significant Total Silver 5 .6175 .03403 36.287 P<0.01significant Total Selenium 5 .5500 .02915 42.183 P<0.01significant
DF= 4
148
Table 5.38b. Karl Pearson correlation between Meteorological parameters and
cadmium
Parameters Correlation value Statistical inference
Monthly Mean Maximum -.885* P<0.05 significant Monthly Highest temperature -.943* P<0.05 significant Annual Lowest Temperature .987** P<0.01 significant Seasonal Mean R.H. morning .995** P<0.01 significant Monthly Mean R.H.morning .992** P<0.01 significant Seasonal Highest R.H. morning .968** P<0.01 significant Monthly Highest R.H. morning .968** P<0.01 significant Seasonal Lowest R.H.morning 933* P<0.05 significant Seasonal Lowest R.H. evening 940* P<0.05 significant Seasonal heaviest rainfall in 24 HRS(mm) -.928* P<0.05 significant Annual mean wind speed(kmph) 993** P<0.01 significant Monthly mean wind speed(kmph) .968** P<0.01 significant
5.3.2.3. Discussion
On a comprehensive view the locational variations in phytochemicals is
markable.
The plant sample of L1 (coastal tract) reveals high amount of carbohydrate,
protein, organic carbon, copper, manganese, and the cadmium and the maximum
numbers of terpenes, sterols and hydrocarbon content. The ash value, potassium, zinc,
iron, molybdenum, chromium and nickel are lower than the other locations.
The L2 (hilly terrain) samples possesses lipids, nitrogen, calcium, magnesium;
iron, boron, nickel, manganese, and the cadmium in lower quantity and the other
parameters analysed are in moderate level.
In the L3 (riverine zone) zinc, boron, cobalt, are higher and the organic
carbon, magnesium, protein, mercury, selenium are lower and the other parameters
are moderate.
In the L4 (Terrestrial-rural) area organic carbon , nitrogen, potassium, sulphur,
chromium lead mercury, silver are considerably higher than other locations and the
Carbohydrates, phosphorous, sodium, iron, boron, are lower than the other locations
and the other factors are in moderate level.
L5 (Terrestrial-urban) area shows high contents of ash, phosphorous, sodium,
molybdenum, and the low contents of lipids, nitrogen, calcium, sulphur, nickel, lead,
cobalt, and mercury. The other parameters are at moderate level.
Mohamed and Alain (1995) suggested that accumulation of carbohydrates
under salinity stress being due to reduction in their utilization, either as a source of
149
energy or for the formation of new cells and tissues. On the other hand, Cornic and
Massacci (1996) and Abo Kassem et al (2002) reported that high salt concentration
can result in osmotic adjustment by regulating the accumulation of solutes especially
sugars and proteins.
In calotropis procera seedlings the total soluble and insoluble carbohydrates
content in the shoot and root tended to increase with increasing salinity stress in the
solution culture and also with the age of the plant which were considered to play an
important role in the osmotic adjustment (Al-Sobhi et al., 2006).
In this connection, Ahmed and Girgis (1979) emphasized the importance of
nitrogen intermediates as osmotically active ingredients in plant metabolism and
showed that desert plants depend, to a large extent, on the accumulation of organic
intermediates in building up their osmotic pressure. Nilsen and Orcutt (2000) reported
that plants frequently produce a number of unique proteins in their response to
environmental stresses. The rate of element uptake by plant is substantially affected
by plant species grown on different soils (Tlustoš et al. 2001).
Khanzada et al., (2008) worked on Calotropis procera (Ait). R.Br.
(Ascelpiadaceace) which are collected from, the different locations of Sindh shows
significant variations in the composition of As, Ca, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na,
Pb and Zn elements. The amount of Ca was the highest among them. Ca varied
according to the collection point. Maximum amount (1481.2 mg/g) of Ca was present
in the samples collected from Daulatpur Saffan and minimum amount 9.0 mg/g was
present in the samples from Jamshoro.
Khanzada et al., (2008), also reported the variations in the protein content of
calotropis procera which collected from different places. The highest value of total
protein recorded was 50.80% of dry weight (Daulatpur), 32.11% (NawabShah), 25%
(Hyderabad) and (Jamshoro) and 29.45% from different sites. Previously the highest
total protein was reported in Calotropis procera in leaf extracts 23.94, stem 8.94, bark
12.69 (Kalita et al., 2004).
Samat et al.,(2009) found that the seasonal and locational variations in the
minerals by analyzing Twenty-nine of browse plant species that recommended by
camel herders (trees and shrubs) and 24 forage types of crop residues, grasses and
forbs were collected by hand plucking and clipping from different part of Sudan
during dry and wet seasons.
150
The concentration of Mg, K, Fe, Zn was higher than other elements and the
amount of Cd, As, Pb and Cr was minimum 0.12 to 0.97 mg/g, whereas Cu and Mn
was11.9 to 12.33 mg/g and Zn 5.15 to 2.022 ppm As 40.2 μg to 30.11 μg in C.
procera from Sindh. Variations of elemental concentrationsvaried from high in Ca
(1481.2 ppm) and low in K (387.8ppm) where the K, Mg, Ca. was reported in
maximum values, wile Na, Mn, Zn, Cr are present in minimum range.
Spitaler et al., (2006) found that the total contents of sesquiterpene lactones
and flavonoids were not positively correlated with the altitude of the growing site.
However, the proportion of flavonoids with vicinal free hydroxy groups in ring B to
the flavonoids lacking this feature significantly increased with elevation.
Additionally, the level of caffeic acid derivatives also positively correlated with the
altitude of the growing site. In particular the amounts of 1-methoxyoxaloyl-3, 5-
dicaffeoylquinic acid significantly increased in elevated sites and samples from the
summit region contained 85% more of this compound than samples from valley sites.
A study was carried out by Negi et al., (2009) to determine the accumulation
and variation of trace elements in roots and leaves of Asparagus racemosus collected
from four different altitudes in Uttarakhand, India. The metals investigated were Zn,
Cu, Mn, Fe, Co, Na, K, Ca, and Li. The concentration level of Fe was found to be
highest at an altitude of 2,250 m, whereas the level of Cu was lowest.
Chieh et al., (2006) found that the concentration of synephrine,
evodiamine, dehydroevodiamine and rutaecarpine are highly varying from location to
location.
In plants, polyphenol synthesis and accumulation is generally stimulated in
response to biotic/abiotic stresses (Dixon and paiva, 1995; Naczk, and shahidi, 2004)
such as salinity (Navarro et al., 2006). Ksouri et al., (2007) found that Jerba and
Tabarka accessions differed in their growth response to salinity level, and the poly
phenol content.
Oliveira et al. (2006) studied that the Mikania cordifolia which are collected
from different locations and found that there are no significant qualitative differences
related to the presence of triterpenes and steroids. Finally they concluded that all
collected specimens of M. cordifolia presented similar constitution of triterpenoids,
despite some possible differences in proportions.