6 twila markham v gerald markham pet declaration 13-3-08383-7 sea

7/21/2019 6 Twila Markham v Gerald Markham PET Declaration 13-3-08383-7 SEA

1/19

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

FILED

13 OCT 04 PM 12:42

KING COUNTY

SUPERIOR COURT CLEF

E-FILED

CASE NUMBER: 13-3-08383-'

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON

IN AND FOR KING COUNTY

In re the Marriage of: )

)TWILA MARKHAM ) NO.13-3-08383 - 7 SEA

Petitioner, )

)and ) WIFESDECLARATION

) OPPOSING MOTION TO DISMISS

GERALD WAYNE MARKHAM )

Respondent. )

____________________________________________)

TWILA MARKHAM, on oath, certifies and declares as follows:

1. Ia m the Petitioner in the above-captioned case. I have personal knowledge of

the following facts and I am competent to testify.

2. My husband and I have been married for 33 years. Our marriage permanently

ended after an escalation o f domestic violence in late April, 2013. I filed for dissolution in

early May. In the early years of our marriage, we lived in Alaska where Jerry practiced law.

Jerry is well known in Kodiak where we formerly lived. He was an Assistant State Attorney

General and worked in governmental offices for many years.

WIFES DECLARATION -1 LAW OFFICES________________________

M i c h a e l W. B u g n i & Assoc . , p l l c11320 ROOSEVELT WAY NORTHEAST

SEATTLE, WA 98125

(206) 365-5500 FACSIMILE (206) 363-8067


2/19

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

3. The home in which I currently reside was purchased 1986. Jerry and I jointly

lived there until he was arrested in April. As Jerry has begun to wind down his business over

the past 10+ years, we have traveled less and less to Alaska. We began purchasing real

property and spending more time in Seattle. We assisted my son in the purchase o f his home

which is across the street from the rental behind my home. He is a great help to me. Neither

Jerry nor I have qualified for the Alaska Permanent Fund dividend, an annual payment made

to Alaska residents, for I would estimate 10 years or more. Prior to separation, Jerry was

denied an Alaska real property tax deduction because he was absent from the State too many

days.

4. Our marriage has a history of domestic violence. As previously stated, Jerry

was arrested in April, 2013 for domestic violence. He has entered into a Stipulated Order of

Continuance which requires that Jerry participate in a Washington State Domestic Violence

Program. The treatment program will require that Jerry maintain a presence in Washington

for the next year.

5. Since our separation, Jerry has told the court and our mutual friends that he

lives in our house in Friday Harbor and uses his private airplane to travel between Friday

Harbor and Seattle. Jerry submitted responses to interrogatories verifying that the majority of

time has been spent in Washington over the past 20 months (January, 2012 - August, 2013).

Exhibit 1.

WIFES DECLARATION - 2 LAW OFFICES______________

M i c h a e l w . b u g n i & Assoc . , p l l c11 $20 ROOSEVELT WAY NORTHEASTSEATTLE, WA 98125

(206)365-5500 0 FACSIMILE (206) 363-8067


3/19

1

2

n

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

6. We also own substantial real property in Alaska, however, we have a caretaker

for that property, Karl Loeffler. I have not been to Alaska for more than short visits for 8 - 10

years. 1consider myself a Washington resident and I intend to continue living in my Seattle

home for the foreseeable future. I do not ever intend to reside in Alaska in the future. While

it may be true that I have an Alaska drivers license and voter registration, I do intend to

change those. Jerry was very controlling during our marriage and it was he who insisted we

be domiciled on paper in Alaska even though we lived our day-to-day lives in Washington.

Now that we are divorcing, I would like to move forward with formally establishing domicile

here. My support system is all here in Seattle, including my son who lives across the street

from me. My dog has been going through post-stroke and post cancer rehabilitation

treatment, which is all here in the Seattle area. All of Jerrys doctors are also here in Seattle;

none in Alaska. Exhibit 1, pg. 10, Interrogatory No. 4.

7. Jerrys motion contained a document which purports to be signed by me and

notarized by someone by the name o f Richard Return. There were multiple times during our

marriage when Jerry forced me to sign documents. Some I was allowed to read, some not.

Several days before April 15, 2013, Jerry approached me with the type-written affidavit and

told me to sign it. The purpose of the document was his attempt to obtain a senior citizen

property tax exemption for our property at 211 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska 99615. But he

knew' that if we did not qualify for Alaska residency, he would not get the exemption. The first

few times he told me to sign the affidavit, I declined. I told him I did not want to have

WIFES DECLARATION - 3 LAW OFFIC ES____________________________

M i c h a e l W. b u g n i & A ssoc. , p l l c11320 ROOSEVELT WAY NORTHEAST

SEATTLE, WA 98125

(206)365-5500 0 FACSIMILE (206)363-8067


4/19

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

1516

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

anything to do with his fraudulent representations. I explained that I do not want to sign it

because I do not live in Kodiak. I live in Seattle.

8. Jerrys response was to become increasingly agitated and belligerent toward

me. He increased his mental, emotional and physical domination over me by making repeated

degrading comments, criticizing my logic for not signing it, blaming me that we have to live

in Seattle and not in Kodiak. I refused to sign the affidavit and said I want nothing to do with

it. But Jerry was persistent and increasingly angry. He approached me to sign repeatedly.

This pattern of me refusing to sign and Jerry relentlessly badgering me went on for several

days. Eventually, I was exhausted and broken down. Jerry succeeded. I threw up my hands

and gave in. I signed the affidavit against my will, just to be free of Jerrys constant

browbeating and berating. Unfortunately, even though I signed, Jerry could not calm himself

and his violence continued to escalate until he was arrested just days after he forced me to

sign.

9. The affidavit purports to be notarized, but I do not even recall the document

getting notarized or being present at the notarization.

10. Irrespective of whether I was domiciled in Alaska on the date that the affidavit

was signed or not, does not change the fact that after separation in late April - after Jerrys

arrest for domestic violence - 1continued in my determination to remain in my Seattle home

as my permanent residence and domicile. When I signed the Petition for Dissolution in King

County, I truthfully stated that I was a resident of King County. I intend to remain living in

WIFES DECLARATION - 4 LAWOFFICES___________________________

M i c h a e l W. B u g n i &Assoc . , p l l c11320 ROOSEVELT WAY NORTHEAST

SEATTLE, WA 98125

(206) 365-5500 0 FACSIMILE (206) 363-8067


5/19

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

here in my home, with my dog, across the street from my adult son and where the entirety of

my support system is anchored. I ask that the court respect my choice and deny Jerrys

motion.

11. Not only do I want to keep the divorce matter here in Washington State

because I live here, but I would be at a substantial disadvantage i f we had to litigate the

divorce in Alaska. Jerry was a prominent attorney in the town where we lived and was a

former Assistant Attorney General for the State of Alaska.

I certify and declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of

Washington that the foregoing statement is true and correct.

Dated: October 4,2013

I A

TWILA MARKHAM

Petitioner/Wife

WIFES DECLARATION - 5 LAW OFFICE S ___________________

M i c h a e l w . Bu g n i & a s s o c ., p l l c11320 ROOSEVELT WAY NORTHEASTSEATTLE, WA 98125

(206) 365-5500 g j FACSIMILE (206) 363-8067


6/19

Exhibit 1


7/19

V J J .* - * * 1 J k l A U a .A - 4Fax: Aug 23 2013 11:33am PG14/048

GO# 2013-137730 OPEN

SE|TTLE LAW DEPT RELEASE COPY

1313-1ASSLT-NONAGG-DV

ii12 VICTIM INJURIES: |

{Pain to right forearm | -->}

13 INCIDENTAL PROPERTY DAMAGE: (DESCRIPTION VALUE)

{N/A --|>}

14 VEHICLE IMPOUNDED?: | [N] (Y/N)

STORAGE LOCATION: [ j ]

15 INITIAL INCIDENT DESCRIPTION / rlARRATIVE:

{On April 24, 2013 I was working luniformed patrol in a single officer

marked unit as 3U03. At approximately 2143 hours I was dispatched to a DV

disturbance call at 5906 8 Ave NB, j The Call read, "COMPLS FRIEND'S

HUSBAND OUTSIDE OF THE DOOR. HE PUSHED THE VICTIM EARLIER. SUSP HAS ACCESS

TO GUNS BUT COMPL HAS NOT SEEN ONEj" Updates on the call included, "VICTIM

IS WITH THE COMPL BECAUSE SHE WAS j CARED" and "THE SUSPECT LIVES WITH THE

VICTIM AT 810 NE 58 ST . UNK WHERE [SUSPECT IS NOW,THEY DON'T SEE HIM . HE

IS POSE INTOX . > i

I arrived at C/MIGAL's residence dnd contacted MIGAL and V/Markham, TWILA Y

W/F/04-22-1948 inside. TWILA appeared very frightened and upset. She was

initially having trouble answering jquestions about what had happened. As

she spoke she would repeatedly stop and attempt to hold back tears and

catch her breath. TWILA stated to jme that she and her husband A/Markham,

GERALD W W/M/09-09-1947 have been parried for 35 years and currently live

together at 810 NE 58 ST. I

TWILA advised me of the following:

GERALD has been going to anger management sessions recently. The sessions

are attended by him but for their pon. He had been angry all week after

attending the session. Tonight GERALD was also upset about TWILA not

answering her phone. TWILA stated Ithat GERALD is very controlling and gets

upset at her very easily

go to her son's hous

Because GERALD was upset today, TWILA decided to

(next door tjo theirs) after dropping her son off at

the airport. TWILA stated that shd was concerned that GERLAD would assault

her because he is alr^'dyUll^HHNT^^'JwiLA stated that there is a history of

unreported assaults between GERALD land her. She explained'*'that"'b.e~-had'

"s lugged "diHr in the past.

TWILA wanted to go to her friend MIGAL's house tonight to be away from

GERALD. She stated that she wantec) to bring her dog because it is sick and

needs medication. She did not feel comfortable leaving the dog with

For: 6558 Printed On: Apr-25-2013 (Thu.) Page 5 o f 36


8/19

Fax: Aug 23 2013 11:34am PQ15/Q48

SEATTLE POLICE DEPA MEM

GENERAL OFFENSE HARDCOPYSEATTLE LAW DEFT RELEASE COPY

GO#2013-137730 OPEN I 1313-.1 ASSET-NONAGG-DV

GERALD. TWILA and MIGAL went to TWjlLA's house to get the dog. TWILA

stated that GERALD told her he did jnot want her to go and began pushing her/

into a wall in andnear _the living Jrogni. -.She_ stated _ that .he_uaed^hlfi .fcajidsj

and body to forcibly push her into ia wall, preventing her from walking away

from him. TWILA stated that she wajs fearful for her safety. TWILA stated

that GERALD told her that she shouljd stay so they couIdTTTalk. TWILA then

stated to me, "I know better than jthat though. TWILA pointed to her right

forearm andstated that she felt pajin there when she was getting pushed- I

did not see any visible marks on TWILA from tonight's incident. I observed

a small scratch to TWILA1s right fcjrearm that was beginning to heal. TWILA

stated that she had received the sdratch a few days prior when GERALD was

grabbing her and she pulled away, j

!I spoke with MIGAL who advised thatj she was present during the incident,She had gone to meet TWILA because[TWILA was scared and wanted to leave her

house. MIGAL stated that she had l$een standing next to the front door

(with a clear view of the living rcj>om and kitchen) during the argument and

assault between GERALD and TWILA. jMIGAL stated that she saw GERALD push

and shove TWILA, knocking her intojwalls when she was trying to leave.

MIGAL had her two kids with her when she came to get TWILA. Her children

are about 3 and 5 years old. MIGAL stated that she does not think they

witnessed the assault, just heardjthe commotion. MIGAL also stated that

she felt as though GERALD was holding back his anger toward TWILA because

she was present. j

TWILA. and MIGAL left and went to MIGAL's house. TWILA stated that she was

unable to take her dog because GERALD would not let her- While at MIGAL's

house, GERALD came over and began pounding on the front door. MIGAL stated

that GERALD was asking her if her iiusband was home tonight. MIGAL advised

me that her husband was not home tdnight. GERALD walked away southbound

from MIGAL1s residence. Ii!

After speaking with TWILA, I responded to GERALD'S house to attempt contact

with him. GERALD was home and agreed to come outside and speak with me,

GERALD denied placing his hands onlTWILA. GERALD stated that he was

concerned about TWILA1s level of intoxication, and had told her not to leave

the house because she was too inebriated. GERALD also stated that he did

not want her to take the dog. GERALD stated that he and TWILA had both

tugged at the dog leash when TWILAjtried to take it.

|I did not immediately advised GERALD that he was being audio recorded.

When I did advise him, GERALD stated that he no longer wanted to talk and

attempted to walk back into his house. I advised GERALD that he was not

free to walk away. GERALD stated that he was done talking about the

incident and wanted a lawyer. ;

For: 6558 Printed On: Apr-25-2013 (Thu.) Page 6 o f36


9/19

Fax: Aug 23 2013 11;3dam PQ16/0d8

SEATTLE POLICE DEPa MENT

GENERAL OFFENSE HARDCOPYSEATTLE LAW DEPT RELEASE COPY

GO# 2013-137730 OPEN 1313-1 ASSLT-NONAGG-DV

I placed GERALD under arrest and walked him to Officer Schmitt's patrol

vehicle. I advised GERALD of his Fjliranda Rights, GERALD stated that he

understood his rights and wanted to speak further. GERALD stated that what

had occurred tonight did not amount!, to a DV Assault. He restated that he

was just trying to keep TWILA from[leaving when She was intoxicated.

Officer Schmitt transported Ge r a l d !to the North Precinct. He was later

booked into KCJ. ;

I re-contacted TWILA and walked henj" back to her residence. TWILA stated

that she was concerned that GERALD|would be angry about getting arrested.

She stated that she had recently tcjld him that if he continued to hurt 'her

he would end up in jail. TWILA wasjvery fearful of GERALD being angry when-

he got out of jail. She stated that she is concerned that he will assault

her again. TWILA. advised me that dERALD has numerous guns, but that she

has taken them and hidden them at her son's house next door because she is

scared of what he might do to her. TWILA also informed me that she has

been in contact with DAWN looking for assistance in removing herself from

an abusive relationship. TWILA suited that she will be staying somewhere

else in case GERALD is released frq>m jail. When I advised TWILA that she

should pack up personal belongings and clothing tonight she stated that she

already has an "escape bag ready tio go.

i provided TWILA with a business c^rd and case number as well as a DV

pamphlet. j

i

A/Lt Pendergrass #4942 screened the incident and arrest at the North

Precinct - iI

I hereby declare (certify) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the

State of Washington that this report

my knowledge and belief (RCW 9A.72.G

is true and correct to the best of

85)

Electronically signed:

SAN MIGUEL, SHELLEY A Date: kpr-2 5-2013 Place: Seattle, WA

tii

For: 6558 Printed On: Apr-25-2013 (Thu.) Page 7 o f36


10/19

Fax: flug 23 2013 11:34am P017/048

SEATTLE POLICE DEPA MENT

GE RAL OFFENSE HARDCOPY

S TLE LAW DEPT RELEASE COPY

GO# 2013-137730 OPEN 1313-1ASSLT-NONAGG-IJV

Related Text Page(s) |Document: [REPORT SNAPSHOT] j

Author: 6910 - SAN MIGUEL, SHELLEY A I

Subject: REPORT SNAPSHOT |

Related date/time: Apr-25-2013 (Thu.) 127 j

T e x t u a l r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h e o f f i c e r ' s MRE r e p o r t

Offense # 137730 |

Offense year : 2013 j

Date occurred : 04-24-2013 j

Time reported :2141 j

Status : O (OPEN) j

Family Violence : N j

Submitted by : 6910 (SAW MIGUEL, SHELLEY A (6910))

Date reported : 04-24-2013 :

Time reported : 2141 1 j

Org Unit : B123U (NORTH PCT 3RD W -j UNION)

Location : 810 NE 58 ST j

Municipality : SE (SEATTLE) j

County : 17 (KING) j

Bias : 88 (NONE (NO BIAS)) jFelony/Misdemeanor : M j

Gang involved : N (NO GANG INVOLVEMENT)

IBR OFFENSE i

Offense code : 1313 j

Offense extension : 1 j

C/A : C i

Offender suspected of using co: N (|NOT APPLICABLE)

Location type codes : 20 (RESIDENCE/HOME)

Type of weapon used ; 40 (PERSONAL I WEAPONS (HANDS, FIST, TEETH,

ETC.)) !

NARRATIVE TEXT

Subject ; INCIDENT NARRATIVE

Type of text : NT (NARRATIVE)

REPORT INFORMATION

For: 6558 Printed On: Apr-25-2013 (Thu.) Page 8 of 36


11/19

Exhibit 2


12/19

Fax: Aug 23 2013 11:30am PQQ3

^ .. ,C O U n i

' 'if'

IN THE SEATTLE MUNICIPAL COURT

KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON

THE CITY OF SEATTLE

Plaintiff,

V5-

C^efo\A lY]agB-,aj


13/19

Fax; Aug 23 2013 11:30am PQOd

Incident Report No: \ Y l " \ ) 1 J j

Additional Materials and/or Evidence Is Identified As Follows:j

0 See Attachment A for Defendants Agreement. : '

Defendant understands that the police reports and any Other specified materials listed above, for administrative purposesonly, may be marked as exhibits. These documents will! be filed in the court file but they will not be admitted intoevidence at this time. Should Defendant violate this Stipulated Order of Continuance he or she hereby waives anyobjection to their admission into evidence at a future hearing.

5. D efen dan ts Pro m ise to be P re se nt in Cou rt. |The Defendant understand s and agrees that s/he shall beprese nt in court a t all fu ture court hearings he re in ijnless previously waived by the Judge and that failing to appearin court as ordered may be a violation o f this Agreement.

6. R estitu tion . The Defendant agrees to pay restitution to____________________The restitution am ount shallbe paid through Sea ttle Municipal Court in the am ou nt of CD______or 0 to be determined.

7. M on itorin g of Co nd itions . The Defendant agrees that compliance with this Agreement shall be monitored by Seattle Municipal Probation 0 The Court. The defendan t agrees to report to Seattle Municipal Probationimmediately following the court hearing a t which this Agreement is e ntered and to any appo intments subsequentlyscheduled by Seattle Municipal Probation. The Defendant understands and agrees tha t failure to report to Probationand/orfailure to provide proof o f compliance with conditions may be a violation o f this Agreement The Defendant isresponsible fo r filing proof of compliance with all conditions with Probation^

8. Costs of M onitoring Compliance. The Defendant agrees to pay k / O Q to Seattle Municipal Court as acompliance mon itoring fee.9. O the r Fin ancia l Pe nalties : The Defendant agrees to pay ______to Seattle Municipal Court in addition torestitution or mon itoring fees, :10. Crim inal Law V iolation s. The Defendant shall have no criminal law violations during the term ofth isAgreem ent The Defendant und erstan ds and agrees jthat this Court may take action on the Prosecution's motionalleging the Defendant's violation of this condition prio r to any resolution of the alleged new criminal law violation.

The Defendant specifically agrees that a "convictionT for a criminal law violation occurring afte r the entry of thisAgreement is no t a pre requisite to this Court taking iaction on the Prosecution's m otion to revoke this Agreementdue to the Defendant's alleged violation of this condition.

The Defendant un derstan ds and agrees th at in a [hearing alleging violation of this condition, the P rosecutionmay proceed via the admission of reliable hearsay ajone. ER 1101(c) The Defendant further agrees that theDefendant's petition or other reques t of any Washington Court to gran t the Defendant a Deferred Prosecution

pursuan t to RCW 10.05 et seq., for any new crirainaJjlaw v iolation occurring af ter th e en try o f th is Agreement shallbe a vio lation of this condition. Traffic a nd/o r civil in fractions are no t cons idered criminal law violations.

11. Add ress an d T elep ho ne Inf orm atio n. The Defendant agrees to notify the Court or Seattle MunicipalProbation within 24 hours of any change of residence addre ss, mailing address, or teleph one number.12. Or de r fs) P roh ibitin g Con tact. The Defendant agrees to strictly comply with all provisions of an y cou rt order

pm jrib iting contact The Defendant shalbnot contac t o r ;- \ U S ~


14/19

obtain the evaluation within 30 days or by______j and shall commence any recommended treatmentwithin 30 days of completion of the evaluation. j16. DV Batterers Intervention Program . Thie Defendant shall successfully complete a state-certifiedDomestic Violence Batterers Intervention Program! as approved by Seattle Municipal Probation. Defendant shall

complete intake process and enroll in the program within 45 days of today's date, or within 30 days of thecompletion of Phase I of a required chemical dependency program.17. Parenting Class. The Defendant shall attehd and successfully complete a parenting class at a locationapproved by Seattle Municipal Probation. The Defendant shall begin class within 30 days of today's date or by

18. CH Mental Health Evaluation. The Defendant shall obtain a mental health evaluation from a licensedprovider of mental health services and successfully comply with all treatment recommendations, includingprescribed medication. The evaluation should be completed within a date determined by probation or by

Fax: Aue 23 2013 11:31am P005/048

19. Treatmen t compliance. The Defendant understands and agrees that compliance with any treatmentcondition requires regular, continuous attendance ajnd participation a t all treatment sessions required by theprovider and agrees that non-compliance with treatment requirements may be a violation ofthis Agreement2D. Other Conditions:

-H^yi V VWt->1Of OJA,

21. Release Authorization. The defendant agrees jto sign all necessary releases to allow Seattle MunicipalProbation and treatment providers to fully exchange information regarding compliance issues.

P r o c e d u r e o n Su c c e s s f u l Com pl e t io n o fCo n d it io n s

The City agrees to continue the case until, LJ .( D If the Defendant has successfully complied

with the conditions of this Agreement, the Prosecution agrees to move to dismiss the charges with prejudice at that

De f en d a n t , y C / o / p

P' hLo^L,

De f en d a n t's a t t o r n ey

The court, having considered the motion, exhibits and arguments of counsel, andstipulated order of continuance is appropriate, hereby orders this matter continued to

subject to the terms and conditions listed above. !

aving found that a" r / / y <

Judge


15/19

Exhibit 3


16/19

mg

IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE

CERTIFIEDCOPY

Th e c i t y o f Se a t t l e , Pl a i n t i f f

iI .. , L j I H iV f k k

Defendant

1.

Protected Persons Identifiers:

Name (First, Middle, Last)

PrfflM L&,HOB ' ~ ~ Gender

Domestic Violence No-Contact OrderM Pre-Trial Post Conviction

Replacement Order (paragraph 8)

Clerks Acti on Required

Case# ' | //hi1," / -Vi i ***

This no-con tact order expires on: r- >

(Five years from the date issued if no date is entered)

No-Contact Order

Defendants Identifiers

Ls=

Race

Date of Birth

: f i t . / M m

Gender Race

: M i l l # l; ' I j L / i X -

M l. r f r *

Findings of Fact

2. Based upon the record both written and oral, the court finds that the defendant has been charged with,arrested for, or convicted of a domestic violence offense, and the court issues this Domestic Violence -No-Contact Order under chapter 10.99 RGW to prevent possible recurrence of violence.

3. Th ^court further finds tha tthe defendants relationship to a person protected by this order is an intimate partner (former/current spouse; parent of common child; or former/current cohabitants as

intimate partners) or Other family member as defined by Ch. 10.99 RCW: SMC 12A.06.120.

4. (Pretrial Order) For crimes not defined as a serious offense, the court makes the following

mandatory findings pursuant to RCW 9.41.800: The defendant used, displayed, or threatened touse a firearm or other dangerous weapon in a felony. The defendant is ineligible to possess afirearm due to a prior conviction pursuant to RCW 9.41.040; or Possession of a firearm or otherdangerous weapon by the defendant presents a serious and imminent threat to public health or safety,or to the health or safety of any individual.

5. Defendant:

A. do not cause, attempt; or threaten to cause bodily injury to, assault, sexually assault, harass, stalk,or keep under surveillance the protected person.

B. do not contact the protected person, directly, indirectly, in person or through others, by phone, mail,

electronic or any other means, except for mailing or service of process of court documents througha third party, or contact by the defendants lawyers. ^

C. do not knowingly enter, remain, or come within v >" (500 feet if no distance entered) of theprotected persons residence, school, workplace, other: :

exceptions:

E. other:

31-017 Domestic Violence No-Contact Order WPF NC 02.0100 (May 2012) - RCW 10.99.040, .045.050Original-Court Yellow-Defendant Pink-Victim Golden-City Attnys Office - Page 1 of 2


17/19

Warning; Violation of the provisions of this order with actual notice of its terms is a criminaloffense under chapter 26.50 RCW and will subject a violator to arrest; any assault, drive-byshooting, or reckless endangerment that is a violation of this order is a felony. You can be

arrested even if the person protected, by this order invites or allows you to violate^ the ordersproh ibitions. You have the sole resp ons ibility to avoid or refrain from violating the ordersprovisions. Only the court can change the order upon written application.

Additional Warn ings to Defendant: This order does not modify or terminate any order entered inany other case. You are still required to comply with other orders.

Willful violation of this order is punishable under RCW 26.50.110. State and federal firearmrestrictions apply. 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8)(9); RCW 9.41.040.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2265, a court in any of thjj0 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto3Rico,.any U|iitert.^%fe^..territO!r^.APftany tribal lanS'within th^/United States shg.ll.accord fu lL ,,faith and credit tb th e order. f

Addi tional Orders

" ' ' - -

6. Ef Civil standby: The appropriate law enforcement agency shall, at a reasonable time and for areasonable duration, assist the defendant in obtaining personal belongings located at:

f | r- \]. ^ ft % - '

7. The clerk of the court shall enter this order into a computer-based criminal intelligence systemavailable in the state used by law enforcement to list outstanding warrants or forward a copy of thisorder on or before the next judicial day to the protected persons local law enforcement agency,

8. This order replaces all prior no-contact orders protecting the same person issued under this cause

number. .

Dated:f . # J

6 twila markham v gerald markham pet declaration 13-3-08383-7 sea

Documents