digital.library.unt.edu/67531/metadc928104/m2/1/high_re… · disclaimer this report was prepared...

itWEWgwuva-g! P ' ~- ° 7 DEIFP'

I CUl4Sir««K-I CHAMOeptO 3 c«viAiNs>«4aocetAssimoiMra

? WMeB<B i^sitciiyi. •

CO

U P w « ft

o o o

IPREDC 935

This document consists

of 58 pages

ROUGH DRAFT

This documeat is BLICLY RELEASABLE

, ADVANCED ENGINEERING PRELIMINARY

H. C. Towle ADVANCED ENGINEERING

April 20, 1961

< G E N E R A L

wmm

DISCLAIMER

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency Thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document.

yNCLASSIFIED miSTMBjTKM mm

s» Ss9

Bo

Bo

A,

C.

P .

P«

F .

E ,

J .

W.

k.

¥ .

S .

c .

w»

E .

W.

E .

/^irends

3age

:3onini

3risken

:?ocke

S-amertsfeldsr

Harpj r

:iiC?ire

Jfezger

Motsringer

Ifeuhoff

J» D-, Selby

^ , Saeltoly

W, B, ^osiooii

H« C, TcTvJle

L« F . Yost

Dosrasest Cont ro l (3) i-'{hy30

ONCUSSIFIED

UTOSIFIEO Contents

Page

'S'JT-*EiIB-l 'Oesicp Stud;f of Low Cost Eeactor for Huclear Heat t ransfe r Rocket. . o . . < « > « » . . . o « . . . . . 5-7

A"SJ;.¥'-MB-2 l^sign Study of Siâll Ifuelear Heat !ânofer Rocket

113f'~HCB-3 D e s i ^ Study for Huclear P.oaket with Specific

AHIF-MIB-ii- Biase I of Narva, Hucleax" Hocket Engine Work . . . . . 14-15 .%Mi|F"Itm"5 Phase XI of Hervs Ilaclear Bocket Engine Study . . . . I6-I8 Alls'-BB-1 Folded Floif Beaetor in CK' - l -^^c i l l ty . . « « , , . . 19-2^*

BB-IA M:1F-HB-3 Bust aad Dir t Ingestion Effects in Folded flew

K C ^ C t O r S . « « • » . « * . « « » « « . « 9 0 0 . a « . 4£p*"2 I

KKW-TSB-k Hl#-0^rpera ture Koa-Iai'briGatod Bearings for Rolling Friction . . . . o o . « . . . . . . . . . . . 28-30

ASEF-BM-1 Be-limluation and Gcajparisoa of SS-AIPB Poorer Plaat

Alll'"EM-2 Huelear and Bierssal Besiga Studies of BeO - Y„0, -UOg - SrOg Ces'^nic Ee®etors . . o . . . . . . ) . . . . 3^-33

AiSilF-TS-l Study, 'Bvahsat® f l isrsal end Bfechaaical ItesigQ Cr i te r ia for lon-li>deratiKg Beaetors. . 0 « o . . o . e a . « > « 39-^-l

MaP-fS-a Preliiainsrj- I^s iga of sa ImproTsd Pos^r Plant for Applicatiosa t o SLAM . i > « « o . a s . * o . » . . « e ls-2-^

isSIF-WBr-l Design Study of Ro-tatiag Fuel Seaetors . h^-kl AÎF-EEB-1 Euslear Para^^tslc Studies of Fast Eeaetors . . . . . i!6-50 PUS-W-FM-l Escperlsmxi^l M r Besigs of Folded Flm Fuel

Bsd Csrtrid^Q. . a i o . . > • « • « « . • « . . . « « 51"'53 SuEHEary of Bfenpoti«r Kequirements . . . . o . o . . . ^ . . . . . . 5^ Maapower Eeîiiresenta . . a « 9 . » . . * . . . « . . . . . < > o . 55-58

UNCIASSIFIED

ONCIASSIFIED Paga h

latroduetioa

Ths puspê of this dos lln8nt is to asseiabls certain job elensBnts

«hisfo Eiaj bscos!i3 parb of t l^ Advanced Engineering Subsection programs,

so that those individuals who raay be requested to participate in such

programs may be aware of the nature and form of Advanced Engineering

-planning.

I t must be reiaambered that this doeun^nt i s a documentation of

the incsptlcHi of prcôsed programs and does not constitute a firm

or rigid program structui®. In a i l probability a good tteal <?£

rsvision ^ 1 1 be exjîdeneed before a firm program i s established.

Since th& nature of this docussentation i s s t ^ e t l y preliminary,

i t should not he used as a basis for r^gotiations tdth t l^ various

goêmsaental agencies. Such & use uanLd ha premature.

Those organizational elsnssnts «fhich 8ê sho^n as tbs performing

elsRsnts ^si the Job planning sheets are listed so tiiat tha t rpe and

quantity of perfoiiaiag organ!satlssi, which u i l l I:® ut i l ised, may be

approximated.

UMSIFIED

/IjTA'^^-y^ U^S-/ H />

SECURITY CLASSIF ICATION

5

, SUBMITTED R . " j . B r l s k e n

^^- t A S K L E A D E R

Job Description Sheet U/lo/61 REVIEWED AND

RECOMMENDED:

CONTROL ORG.

C d N t f i O L S U B - S E C . M Q R .

D D T . L . TASK

D A T E

REVIEWED BY:-

S U B - C O N T R O L U N I T S U P V R . APPROX. START AND FINISH O F JOB: START

M S T -YWr ' ' 'N 'SH: -BiST-

THIS L I N E TO BE USED BY F INANCE ONLY FOR CODING

PROS.EL S.A. DET . COMP.

JOB TITLE Design Study of Low Cost Reactor for Huclear Heat Transfer Rocket for t

Upper Stage Applicat ion.

JOB O B J E C T I V E (RELATIONSHIP TO PRODUCT (HARDWARE) OR NON-PRODUCT (NON-HARDWARE) D E V E L O P M E N T ; F INAL RESULT E X P E C T E D O F THIS JOB

To prepare conceptual design of r eac to r , summary repor t of study r e s u l t s , development cost est imates and development plan.

STATEMENT O F WORK ( I N C L U D E SUB-CONTROL'S RESPONSIBIL ITY, AUTHORIT IES D E L E G A T E D AND RESERVED)

The nuclear rockets studied would incorporate graphite reactors and would be in the 1 X 10° # thrust range. The study would be concentrated on reducing the cost per pound of payload. Special emphasis would be placed on reducing the fuel loading by utilizing the hydrogen propellant and minimizing reactor poisons, reducing the cost of the reflector and simplifying the design.

JOB MILESTONES ( R E F E R E N C E M I L E S T O N E EXAMPLES ON P A G E 2 O F D E P A R T M E N T INSTRUCTION X-2)

NO.

1

MILESTONE

Fina l Report

MO.

12

DAY

31

YR.

61


ANP 82* (S.SI) UNCmSSIFIED

A^y /{^^'/?lî/^'/

CONTWOL OHO.

PURPOSE or E F F O R T :

PRODUCT N O M E N C L A T U R E ; .

MAJOR COMPONENT:

MINOR COMPONENT:

WORD DESCRIPTION OF JOB:

U/10/61

JOB PLANNING SHIET ^4Sê 6

5

_ SUB-MINOR COMPONENT:

. S C I E N T I F I C F I E L D ;

. S U B - C O N T R O L ORQNZ:

. P R O G R A M E L E M E N T :

THIS BLOCK FOR FINANCE

CONTRACTl WORK CLASft

THIS LINE TO BE USED BY FINANCE ONLY FOR CODINO

JOB NO. ^ rASK NO. P F F N MAJ. MIN. SUBM. a.FLD

1 SUB-C c wc PWXiEL S.A. DET. COMP.

ORIGINAL JOB PUNNING 4HEET RESOURCES

1 LABOR

0 1

0 2

OS

0 4

21

22

N O

EXEMPT SCL ft ENO. PERS. (T.E.J

1 Nuclear

1 Thermal 1 Design

] Con t ro l

T O T A L ES ft E ( T E )

TECHNICAL ASSIST ANTS (E A.)

T O T A L T E C H . ASST.

DRAFT1N0

Designer

T O T A L DRAFTING

MANUFACTURING - PROD.

T O T A L MFG. - PROD.

EXPENDITURES

DIR. MAT'L fc SERVICES

SUB-CONTRACTS ft C.A.

70* COMPUTER

NON-FUND

ODF II

T O T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S

COMMITMENT BALANCE

DIR. MAT'L ft SERVICES


T O T A L COMMIT B A L A N C E

r E: EXPRESS MANPOWER TO THE NEAREST

i X y X X

UNIT PERF. NUMBER

^ ^ ^ y

<^ 7

,? 3

r^

f^

s fl

3 • ^

2

^

FISCAL Y E A R — » « I 9 6 I

J A S . 1 9 6 1 O N D . 1961 J F M . fB62 AM J - 4-B<<

1961 O . l i 0 . 7 0 . 7

O. l i •

FISCAL YEAR - 4969 1962 | FISCAL YEAR - 49M- 1963

J A S . »>—•• OND-<4B«tt-

1961 1961

.5 1.0 1.0

0.5 •

.

.s 1 . 0 1 . 0

0 . 5 • •

J F M - t * « B 1962

A M J ' 4 * « « J A f t . 1 BBS

1962

. 1 .

O N D . 1BSS J F M . 1964 A M J . 1964

• • • • • •

4

,

. 1 . • • • • •

. .

. 1 . • • •

• • •

. \ .

X ^ s 7 C

-

• • •

• • •

• • •

0 . 7

• •

1.0

• •

1 . 0

• •

• • •

. 1 . • •

• •

• • •

• • •

• • •

•

. 1 .

•

• •

3.3 * • • • •

• •

• •

8 . 1 iî-e-

• •

• •

6.5

• • •

• • •

iftr/t-Vft- . 1 • •

-

. 1 .

•

T E N TH tt AN 3.7) E > P R E

• • •

S5 DOLLARS 1

• • •

N THOUSANDS

• • •

, TO THE NEA

• • •

REST TENTH;

• • .

E.a. S27.S00

• • •

3R 27.3

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

u/10/61 UNCUS81FIE y^s y

.mSTIFICATIOH

Job No. AE^NF Rl*^0 - ' Hltoh/

I s i t underway?

One man e f fo r t a t p resen t . Previous work on parametric study of graphite reactors i s appl icable .

S ta tus :

Just s ta r ted af ter KIWI proposal work f in ished.

General app l i cab i l i t y :

Civil ian and mi l i t a ry space programs. Air Force considers 1057 space lavinchings between 1965 and 1975. Project Phoenix i s studying the poss ib i l i t y of reducing costs from 1000 $/# in o rb i t to 100 %/'i^ in o r b i t .

Following objectives would contribute to the above goal:

low cost ( less uranium fuel inventory), high thrust/weight r a t i o , maximum safety in ground launching, s impl ic i ty of design, possible provisions for safe recovery.

Why should i t be done here?

We have bes t design capab i l i t i e s and experience on gas-cooled reac tors . Conducted parametric study of graphite r eac to r s . Studied controls and safety problems for Nerva proposal .

NCUSSIFIED

^^///^ -y^H^^ -^

5

SUBMITTED BY: R. W. Brisken

TASK L t A D g R

-. wmm V / / ^> / c SECURITY CLASSIF ICATION

•^^^'^ d>

Job Description Slieet U/10/61

DATE

REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED:

CONTROL ORQ.

eONTRdL SUB-See. MdA.

D T.L.

REVIEWED BY: S U B - C 6 N t R O L UNIT SUPVR.

APPROX. START AND FINISH O F JOB: START MST -^nC- ''*"'*" -Ri57

THIS L I N E TO BE USED BY F INANCE O N L Y FOR CODINO

PR06£U S.A. DET . COMP.

JOB TITLE Design Study of Small NucJ^ar Heat Transfer Rocket Reactors (below 2^000 lbs.

thrust) for Upper Stage and Space Vehicle '\.pplication

JOB O B J E C T I V E (RELATIONSHIP TO PRODUCT (HARDWARE) OR NON-PRODUCT (NON-HARDWARE) DEVBLOPMBNT; F INAL RESULT E X P E C T E D O F THIS JOB

To prepare conceptual design of a small nuclear rocket reactor, report on study resul t s , estimated development program and costs .

STATEMENT OF WORK ( I N C L U D E SUB-CONTROL'S RESPONSIBIL ITY, AUTHORIT IES DBLBOATED AND RESERVED)

Mission requirements for nuclear rockets below 25,000 pound thrust would be established. A design study would then be carried out on both moderated and non-moderated reactors from the standpoint of materials, nuclear design, mechanical design, thermodynamic design to determine the feasibility of meeting these requirements. If feasibility is established a conceptual design would be completed, and a devolopnent program with costs would be outlined.

JOB MILESTONES ( R E F E R E N C E M I L E S T O N E EXAMPLES ON PAGE 2 O F D E P A R T M E N T INSTRUCTION X-2)

NO. M I L E S T O N E

F ina l Report

MO.

12

DAY

31

YR

61

ANP «28 (3.6 1)


yfJCLASSIFIED

/^I/t^^7l h/yS ^

CONTROL OHO.

U/10/61

D D T.L. TASK

PURPOSE OF E F F O R T :

PRODUCT NOMENCLATURE

MAJOR COMPONENT:

MINOR COMPONENT:

WORD DESCRIPT ION OF JOB:

JOB PLANNING SHIR

. SUB-MINOn COMPONENT: .

. S C I K N T I F I C F I E L D :

. S U B - C O N T R O L ORONZ:

- P R O O R A M E L E M E N T :

^ ^ . f Is


CONTRACTt WORK CLASS!

THIS LINE TO BE USED BY FINANCE ONLY FOR CODiNO

JOB NO. i rASK NO. P F P N MAI. MIN. S U M . S F L D SUB-C C WC - « « E U . .A. DET. COMP.

ORIGINAL JOB PLANNING SHEET 1 RESOURCES 1 LABOR

0 1

0 2

03

0 4

1 t

12

13

14

IS

21

22

N O

EXEMPT SCI. ft ENO. PERS. (T.E.)

1 Nuclear I Thermo

Stress

T O T A L ES 4 E (TE )

TECHNICAL ASSIST ANTS <EA.>


DRAFTING

Designers

T O T A L DRAFTING

MANUFACTURING - P R O a

*


EXPENDITURES

MR. MAT'L ft SERVICES

SUB.CONTRACTS ft C.A.

704 COMPUTER

NO N-FUND

ODF II


COMMITMENT BALANCE

DIR. MAT*L ft SERVICES



TE: EXPRESS MANPOWER TO THE NEAREST

t

X

UNIT PERF. NUMBER

^ ^ ^

^ ?, ,

s ^ s,

^ ^ F

FISCAL YEAR- 1962

J A S . 1 S B 1 O N D . 1961 J F M - 1962 A M J . * • • <

1961 . 7 • 7 .? • • •

FISCAL YEAR- 1963

JAS- m n 1961 1*0

1.0

.5 • • •

O N D . < f » « f i

1961 1 . 0

i B 0 . 5 • • •

J F M . 196S A M J . 1969

FISCAL YEAR - 1964

J A S . 1969 O N D . 1969 J F M . 1964

• • •

• •

A M J . 1964

• • • • • •

• • • • • B

• • • • • •

'^ u s 7 G • • •

• • •

• • •

• •

1.0

• . 1 .

1.0

• •

• • •

• •

• •

. 1 .

• • B

• • •

B

• •

* 1 *

•

• • • • • 1 • • • •

• • •

•

' •

H *G 3 * « -

• • •

• -T* n ^

• • •

• tf*A

e»ip* • • •

• •

/i^'^U m

• • . 1 .

• • • • • •

• • • • • B

B {

• • B

• •

T E N TH M A N 3.7) E > [PRE

• • •

SS DOLLARS 1

• • •

N THOUSANDS

• • •

TO THE NEA

• • •

REST TENTH;

• • •

e.O. t27.>00

• • •

3R 27.3

• • •

• 1 • • • • II •

• •

• B

•

• «

IFiro ^-. e U/10/61 Ulwlnuuiry-ji ^ ^^

JUSTIFICATION

• Job No. AENF fi'lA'f>-2, V / / « ' / « £ /

. I s i t underway?

One man ef for t on f a s t reac tor applicat ion to small nuclear rocket .

. Sta tus i

Just s tar ted a f te r completion of study for Neirva proposal.

. General app l i cab i l i ty :

Reactors of KIWI type are too large for many appl icat ions. A l i g h t weight reactor would be desirable for upper stage and space vehicle appl icat ions . The f a s t reactor offers po ten t i a l for smallest s ize and weight. This range should be explored and capab i l i t i e s demonstrated.

, Why should i t be done here?

Extensive nuclear study of f a s t reactors has been performed a t ANPD. Materials development i s progressing. Reactor design and control capabi l i t i es are avai lable .

yNMFEO

^^-^-^^4/1^/61

5

su«M.TTio 11. W. B r i s k e n "*' TAIK LEABIR


Job Description Slieet U/10/61

D A T E

CONTROL ORO.

REVIEWED AND

RECOMMENDED: Cf lNTBOL gUB- iBC. MflW.

^^^'^ X/

D D T . L . TASK

6 AVE"

R B V I I W B O • Yi <Ul.eaNTII6L UNIT >UPVH. APPROX. START AND FINISH O F J O I l START ITOT T I C - ' ' N ' « H ' - i r o r

THIS k I N B TO • • USED BY F INANCE ONLY FOR CODINO

FKOfttU S.A. DET . COMP.

JOB TITLE Design Study for Nuclear Rocket with Specific Impulse of More Than 1000 Ib-sec/ lb .

JOB O B J E C T I V K (RELATIONSHIP TO PRODUCT (HARDWARE) OR NON'PRODUCT (NON'HARDWAR E) OSVELOPMBNTi F INAL RESULT E X P E C T E D OP THIS JOB

To explore the capabil i t ies of combined heat transfer and electr ic arc nuclear rocket engines, to prepare conceptual lay-out drawings, summaiy report of study resul ts , development cost estimates and plans.

STATEMENT O F WORK ( I N C L U D E SUB-CONTROL'S RESPONSIBIL ITY, AUTHORIT IES D E L E O A T E D AND RESERVED)

Ihe combination of the nuclear and electric arc system will first be studied and the various requirements ascertained. The most feasible reactor and electric system will then be chosen to meet these requirements and the overall performance of the system calculated.

JOB MILESTONES ( R E F E R E N C E M I L E S T O N E EXAMPLES ON P A G E 2 OF D E P A R T M E N T INSTRUCTION X-2)

NO.

1

MILESTONE

Final Report

MO.

12

DAY

31

YR.

61


ANP Sa* (S>6t) S

/S^A^y^7^/y3 J Ii/10/61

CONTBOL OHOT D D

PURPOSE OP EFPOBTs

PRODUCT N O M E N C L A T U R E : .

MAJOR COMPONENT:

MINOR COMPONENT:

WORD DESCRIPTION OP JOE:_

JOt PLANNING SHRT

. SUB-MINOR COMPONENT: .

. S C I E N T I F I C F I E L D :

. S U a - C O N T R O L ORONZ:


y='d^e f s


CONTRACT: WORK CLASS:

THIS LINE TO • • USED BY PINANCKONLY POP COnNfl

. JOS NO. TASK HO. P F PN _ MAJ. MIN. KIBM. S.PLD SUB-C C - W C - PSoiEL

_J s.*. DET. COMP.

_ ORIGINAL JOB PLANNINO SHOT

pcsoupces

0 1

oz

0 >

0 4

1 1

I t

u

14

19

21

22

N O

LABOR

EXEMPT SCI. S ENO. PERlk ( T . L I

1 Nuclear

1 Thermal 1 Ccmtrols

T O T A L ES « E I T E I

TECHNICAL ASSIST ANTS (EA.)


DRAFTINO

Dpsi pner

T O T A L DRAFTINO

MANUFACTURING • PROD.

T O T A L MPO. - PROD.

EXPENDITURES

DIR. MAT'L . SERVICES

SUB-CONTRACTS S C.A.

T04 COMPUTER

HON-FUND

ODF II


COMMITMENT BALANCE

DIR. MAT'L t SERVICES

SUB-CONTRACTS . C. A



\ < >< X X

UNIT PERF. NUMSBR

y < Y

,^ ^ s

^ <? s

^ ? ^

FISCAL YEAR--»S» I 9 6 I

J A S . t 9 C 1 O N D . 1991 J F M . 1962 A M J . 1962

0 . 7 0 9 7 0 . 3

• • •

FISCAL YEAR- WM- 1962

J A S . 1962

1 . 0 1 . 0 0 . 5

• • •

O N D . 1962

1 . 0 1 . 0 0 . 5

• • •

J F M . 1969

9

A M J . 1969

FISCAL YEAR - » • • - 1963 1

J A S . 1969 O N D . 1969

,

J F M . 1964 A M J . 1964

. 9

•

9 1

1 • • • •

•

• .

• •

• • • • • • • 1 •

^

X 4 .f 7 i, • • •

• • •

• • •

0 * • •

1 #0 • •

! • 0 • •

• •

. • •

• • •

• 9

•

• • 9

• • 9 1

. • • • • • •

. • • • • •

• • . . • .

1 • • • • • •

ai . ^. JT.

T E N TH H A N S.7I E > CPRE

• • •

%» DOLLARS 1

• • •

N THOUSANDS

• • •

» TO THE NEA

. • •

R«ST TENTHj

.

•

E.a. $3T.S00

.

. •

9R t7.S

• • •

• • •

.

.

.

• .

.

. • •

u/10/61

jNCi mm ^^^^ ^ JUSTIFI CATION

Job No. / 4 e N P aUJQ- 3 HhblH

1. Is i t underway? No

2 . . S ta tus :

Not appl icable .

3 . General app l i cab i l i t y :

Most nuclear rockets studied have had specif ic impulses less than 1000 #-sec/#. If higher specif ic impulses can be obtained with combination systems then these systems wi l l increase the payload po ten t i a l of nuclear rockets .

U. Wl^ should i t be done here:

We have bes t design capab i l i t i e s and experience on gas-cooled reac to r s . We have personnel that are extremely capable of performing the integrat ion of these gas-cooled systems with the e l e c t r i c arc system.

UNCLASSIFIED

AENF RWB-U

5

SUBMITTED ^^ y ^ B r i s k e n

REVIEWED BYl

TASK LiAben

*UB.e6MTH6L U>4IT SU^VR.

SECURITY CLASSI mmm y^c£^(- ^ 'V

Job Description Sheet CONTROL ORG.

DATE

REVIEWED AND

RECOMMENDED: eONTft f tL SUa-gBC. MflB.

D D T . L . TASK

BTfTl

APPROX. START AND FINISH O F JOB: START wsr T R T ""''•"'-1357

THIS L I N E TO BE USED BY F INANCE O N L Y FOR CODINO

PR06.EU S.A. DET . COMP.

JOB T I T L E . Phase I of Nerva Nuclear Rocket Engine Work


To provide operat ional* a s s i s t ance , design review, design study and research and development se rv ices to the Los Alamos S c i e n t i f i c Laboratory. The r e s u l t s w i l l be documented in Monthly Progress Le t t e r s and a f i n a l r e p o r t .


The following work w i l l accomplished:

1. Assistance to LASL in t e s t equipment design, t e s t operations and evaluat ion of t e s t r e s u l t s .

2 . Mechanical and s t r u c t u r a l design review of KRv'! r e a c t o r .

3 . Nerva engine system design s tudy.

U. Research and development work.


NO.

V

MILESTONE

Monthly Progress Le t te r s F ina l Report

MO. DAY YR


ANP 82S (S.61) OMCLASSIFIED

/l^/Z/^-yPh/^ - /

CONTROL PRO.



MAJOR COMPONENT:

MINOR COMPONENT: . -

WORD DESCRIPTION OF J O B : ,

D D JOB PLANNING SHEET

y^

5 . SUB-MINOR COMPOHENT: .

. S C I E N T I F I C F I E L D : ,

. S U B - C O N T R O L ORONZ:'



CONTRACT: WORK CLASS;


JOB NO. 1 rASK NO. F F F N MAJ. MIN. SUBM. S.FLO SUB-C C WC PROREL S.A. DET. COMP.

ORIGINAL JOB PLANNINO SHEET RESOURCES

LA60R

0 1

0 2

OS

0 4

11

IX

la

14

IS

—

21

22

N O

EXEMPT SCI. S ENO. PERS. (T.E.)

JTS I r i s i ru . & Controls

dafety Hech. Design

Shield^Radiation '%¥>{?%*'*, E (TE)


Materials Development TTS

T O T A L T E C H , ASST,

DRAFTINO

T O T A L DRAFTING

MANUFACTURtNO - P R O a


EXPENDITURES

DIR. MAT*L 9 SERVICES

SUB.CONTRACTS 9 C.A.

704 COMPUTER

NO N-FUND

ODF n


COMMITMENT BALANCE

DIR. MAT'L It SERVICES



T E: EXPRESS MANPOWER TO THE NEAREST

< UNIT PERF.

NUMBER

3

U i \ h H

1

^ 3

I

c

0 8

1

9 i

I 2

^ n, i d \)

FISCAL YEAR- 1962

J A S - t S S f

M 1 0 1 . r ii 1-0 V? \^

O N D - 1961

in k u l - C l . Q

S '

J F M . 1962 A M J . 1 9 6 a

FISCAL YEAR- 1963

J A S . 1962 O N D - t » 6 2 J F M . 1969 A M J - 1 9 6 9

FISCAL YEAR - 1964

J A S . 1 9 6 9 O N D . 1969

«

J F M . 1964 A M J . 1964

i!6.U iib.U

k 3

3 1

2

0

0

0

J .0

2 .0

• • •

5^0

• • •

3.0

2 .0

.

.

. 5.0

• • •

.

• •

•

•

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • • • • •

• • • • • •

T E N TH h A N 3.7) E> P R E

• • •

SS DOLLARS

• • •

N THOUSANDS

• • •

, TO THE NEA

• • •

REST TENTH:

• • •

E.O. $27,800

• • •

OR 27.3

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

AENF RWB-5

5

SUBMITTED BY: TAiK LfeAbEtt

UNCUSSIFIED SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

^ • ^ ^ / ^ ^6

Job Description Sheet D D

DATE REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED:

CONTROL ORO.

CdNTRAL iUB-See. MOR.

T.L.

DATE

REVIEWED BY: SUB.CbNTA6L UNlY SUPVR. APPROX. START AND FINISH OF JOB: START HBT "Twr

FINISH: Tasr


PROefU S.A. DET. COMP.

JOB T I T L E . Phase II of Nerva Nuclear Rocket Engine Study

JOB OBJECTIVE (RELATIONSHIP TO PRODUCT (HARDWARE) OR NON-PRODUCT (NON-HARDWARE) DEVELOPMENT; FINAL RESULT EXPECTED OF THIS JOB

To provide operat ional «6s is tance , design review, design and (development of engine contro l subsystem and reac tor and shie ld subsystems and support engineering services to LJ\SL. The r e s u l t s of t h i s work wi l l be summarized in repor ts specif ied by NASA.

STATEMENT OF WORK (INCLUDE SUB-CONTROL'S RESPONSIBILITY, AUTHORITIES DELEOATED AND RESERVED)

The following work will be accomplished:

1. Assistance to LASL in test equipment design, test operations and evaluation of test results.

2. Mechanical and structural design review of KIWI reactor.

3. Design and development of engine control subsystem.

U. Design and development of reactor pressure shell and shield.

5. Support engineering .on remote handling equipment, test instrumentation and special test equipment.

JOB MILESTONES (REFERENCE MILESTONE EXAMPLES ON PAGE 2 0 F DEPARTMENT INSTRUCTION X-«

INO. MILESTONE

Reports as spec i f i ed by NASA.

MO. DAY YR.

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

ANP §2* (S.SI) UNCLASSIFIED

•P-. y^S//~-ye;^^ 6'

CONTROL PRO.



MAJOR COMPONENT:

MINOR COMPONENT:

WORD DESCRIPTION OF JOB;

D • JOB PLANNING SHilT

-^= *^ '?^BP '

5 . SUB-MINOR COMPONENT: .


. S U B - C O N T R O L O R G N Z :



CONTRACT: WORK CLASS!

THIS LINE TO BE USED BY FINANCE ONLY FOR COUNO

JOB NO. rASK NO. F E P N MAJ. MIN. SUBM. S.FLO SUBrC c WC Btbio, S.A. DET. COMP.

ORIGINAL JOB PUNNING SHEET RESOURCES

LABOR

0

—

0 2

0 9

0 4

I t

12

13

14

IS

21

22

N O

EXEMPT SCI. ft ENQ. PERS. (T.E.)

ITS

Ins"Ef and Contr. xnermo Biuid Mech.'Des.

Shield Rad. 5!^^tWSE(TE.

T ^ ^ k u 9WA«HTS (EA.I

ITS

iidv. Kneineerine Analysis Materials Development Kech. Dev,


DRAFTINO

T O T A L DRAFT ING

MANUFACTURINO • P R O a

T O T A L MFO. - PROD.

EXPENDITURES

DIR. MAT'L fe SERVICES


704 COMPUTER

NON-FUND

ODF II


COMMITMENT BALANCE

DIR. MAT'L & SERVICES



r E. EXPRESS MANPOWER TO THE NEAREST

\ v/"

V

^ IX

UNIT PERF. NUMB En

3

SI ' t*

u

U

1

] { 3

\ \

0

5

"n f \ 1

2 0

I 4 J i u 1. - , 1

FISCAL Y E A R - 1962

J A S . 19SI O N D . 196 J F M - 1962

1*H il 1 . n ? Q

2.5

P S n

A M J - 1 9 6 2

3.Q

'?•§ 5,9

2 .5

R'n


J A S . I 9 S Z

H "•U O 2 ^

R%1

O N D - I 9 S 2

M 4^0 O fl»n

J F M . 1969 A M J . 1 S 6 9

FISCAL YEAR - 1964 |

J A S . 1 9 6 9

. 1 .

O N D . 196S J F M . 1964 A M J . 1964

5 6 1 3 , ^ 0 ,2 .0 , ^ .U , ^ . 0

X

L X 1 I.

3

u l i

1

1

3 3

0

8 I

k

0

3 0

k

• 2 .0

3 .0

i o y.o

2] ,0

• 2 .0

3 .0 5 .0 y . u

21.0

. 2 . 0

3 . 0

5 .0

i 'so 21.0

• ^ 0

3 , 0

i o / . O

23.0

•

•

• •

• •

-

. •

•

• •

•

.

.

.

. 1 . ' . 1 •

• 1 •

• •

•

• •

•

• •

•

• •

•

• •

•

• •

•

• •

•

1 . . . 1 . «

T E N TH M A •i 3.7) = > P R E

*

•

•

SS DOLLARS

•

•

•

N THOUSANDS

•

•

•

, TO THE NEA

.

. ,

REST TENTH,

.

.

.

E.O. $27,300

• •

•

OR 27.3

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

• •

•

•

•

•

cr>

CIHJ

JUSTIFICATION

Job AENF RWB-U & AENF RWB-^

1. Is it underway

No.

2. Status

Proposal submitted to AEC-NASA on April 3, I961. Contract to be led

to successful bidder within 120 days thereafter.

3. General applicability

This co\mtry's nuclear rocket program.

h, Why should it be done here

ANPD has qualified personnel to provide the required services.

y^^9^^ ^S

AfliF BB-1 4/10/61

5

SUBMITTED BY:

SECURITY CLASSI FIC A l - l o W V l L n U M ' r i U U

Job Description Sheet

TASK L E A D E R b A T E


CONTROL ORO.

£6NYRdL iUi-See. MAA.

D D T.L. TASK

REVIEWED BY: SUB.C0NTROL UNIT SUPVR.

APPROX. START AND FINISH O F JOB: START txsr


PROG.EU S,A. D E T . COMP.

JOB TITLE Foldad ricM Reactor in CTF~1 F a c i l i t y


Operation of folded flow reactor in the CTF-1 facility to demonstrate capability of using system as efficient and long life remote power generating system.


Design, develop, fabricate and test a folded flow reactor utilizing the design and the technology developed in the P122C-1 program. The limits established are:

1. jBbdsting CTF-1 facility and X-39 engines would be used. 2. For first operation the system will not be a closed gas cycle and electrical power

will not be produced by the facility. 3. A new shield plug and controls actuating linkage will have to be designed. 4. The existing HTRE I and II control systems and consoles will be used. 5. Nichrone wire elements and ZrHx moderator will be used in the core and an in-pilo

test program carried <xi to prove their suitability. 6. A new critical experiment at Evendale will not be required. 7. Life requirements for the system will be aimed at 10,000 hours without intermediate

fuel element reloading.

JOB MILESTONES ( R E F E R E N C E M I L E S T O N E EXAMPLES ON P A G E 2 OF D E P A R T M E N T INSTRUCTION X-2)

NO. M ILESTONE

Final Design Completed ' Fabrication completed and ship to ITS Assembly and ICE at ITS completed Operation 31

62 63 63 63


ANP 128 JIS-SI) CLl^SSIFIED

f Folded Flow in CTF-1

C O N T R O L O R Q .

P U R P O S E O F E F F O R T :

P R O D U C T N O M E N C L A T U R E : .

M A J O R C O M P O N E N T :

M I N O R C O M P O N E N T :

W O R D D E S C R I P T I O N O F J O B :

4/10/61 / % ^ ( °

JOB PLANNING SHEET 5

, S U B . M I N O R C O M P O N E N T :


_ S U B - C O N T R O L O R G N Z :

- P R O G R A M E L E M E N T :

THIS BLOCK FOR FINANCE C O N T R A C T :

WORK C L A S S :

T H I S L I N E T O B E U S E D B Y F I N A N C E O N L Y F O R C O D I N O

J O B N O . J r * S K N O . P F P N M A J . M I N . S U B M . S . F L D S U B - C C WC PBO&ELJ 5. A. O E T . C O M P .

ORIGINAL JOB PLANNING SHEET R E S O U R C E S

L A B O R

0 1

0 2

0 3

0 4

" < 12

13

14

IS

21

Z2

E X E M P T S C I , & E N G . P E R S . ( T . E . )

Mechanical Design

Nuclear Design Aero Thermal

Control Develorment + ITS

T O T A L E S fc E ( T E )

T E C H N I C A L ASSIST A N T S ( E A.)

Nuclear Design

Aero Thermal Control

T O T A L T E C H , A S S T .

D R A F T I N G

M R f t h A n i P-J^l

T O T A L D R A F T I N G

M A N U F A C T U R I N G - P R O D .

Control Development Fuel Developaent + ITS

Mod* Develoisaent

fttriictf. Dfv*! omi'i»ntr A i r Flow '

T O T A L M F G . - P R O D .

E X P E N D I T U R E S

D I R . M A T ' L » S E R V I C E S

S U B - C O N T R A C T S » C .A .

704 C O M P U T E R

N O N - F U N D

G D F II


C O M M I T M E N T B A L A N C E

D I R . M A T ' L & S E R V I C E S

S U B - C O N T R A C T S & C .A .

T O T A L C O M M I T H A L A N C e

u. o X *

P Q. ft. <

U N I T P E R F .

N U M B B R

/

^

4 ^

^

3

3 , <'

/

a a s a 0

/^ ^ ,? 3

o o

X -^ 4 4 4 3

,^ ^

,

S /

S fl s fl 0

z 3 3 0

0


J A S - 1 9 6 1

5 .

2 . 3 .

2 .

5 . 1 7 . -

2 . 2 .

2 . 3 .

5 .

1 4 .

O N D - 1 9 6 1

7 .

2 . 3 . 3 .

5 . 2 0 .

2 . 2 .

2 . 3 .

5 . 1 4 .

J F M - 1 > e 2

7 .

2 . 3 .

3 .

5 . 2 0 .

2 . 2 . 2 . 3 .

5 . U .

A M J . 1 9 6 2

7 .

2 . 3 .

3 .

5 . 20 .

1 . 2 . 2 . 3 .

5 . 13 .


J A S - 1 9 6 2

5 .

1 . 1 .

1 . 5 .

1 3 .

1 .

1 .

1 . 1 .

5 .

9 .

O N D . 1 9 6 2

4 .

1 . 1 .

1 . 1 0 .

1 7 .

1 .

1 . 1 . 1 .

5 .

9 .

J F M . 1 9 6 9

4 .

1 . 1 .

1 . 1 5 . 2 2 .

1 .

1 .

1 . 1 .

5 . 9 .

A M J . 1 9 6 9

3 .

. 5

. 5

1 . 10 .

15 .

FISCAL YEAR - 1964 1

J A S . 1 9 6 3 O N D - 1 9 6 S

1 .

1 .

. 5

. 5

5 . S .

J F M . 1 9 6 4 A M J - 1 9 6 4

• •

•

• •

xw XM

<^ 6

7

7 &

a K* 2 *

6 *

7 . 2 .

9 .

7 . 2 .

9 .

7 . 2 .

9 .

3 . 1 . 5

4 . 5

3 . 1 .

4 .

3 . 1 .

4 .

1 . •

1 .

• «

•

• •

•

• •

•

• •

•

X\3 yi."? xl i xls X\3

6

/ , < 6

6

n n 0

0 0

0

0

o Q 0

1 . 5

2 . 1 .

2» 2 . 8 . 5

1 2 0 * •

A*

._.__._. •

2 4 .

1 . 5 3 . 2 .

4 * 2 .

1 2 . 5

5 0 . .

6 . • •

5 6 .

1 . 5 3 . 2 .

4 * 2 .

1 2 . 5

9 0 . .

6 . . .

9 6 .

1 . 5 3 . 2 .

4 . 2 .

1 2 . 5 3

90 . .

6 . • •

96.

1 . 0 3 . 1 .

4 . 1 .

1 0 .

9 0 . •

6 . • •

9 6 .

. 1 . 0

4 . 1 .

3 . 1 .

1 0 .

3 0 . •

6 . • •

3 6 .

1 . 0

5 . . 5

1 . 1 . 8 . T 1

3 0 . •

6 .

.

. 3 6 .

•

5 . . 5

1 . 1 . 7 . 5

' ,

20 .

. 2 .

• •

2 2 .

•

•

•

•

•

.

.

.

.

.

.

•

•

•

.

.

.

.

.

.

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

N O T E : E X P R E S S M A N P O W E R T O T H E N E A R E S T T E N T H M A N ( 3 7) , E X P R E S S D O L L A R S I N T H O U S A N D S , T O T H E N E A R E S T T E N T H : E .O . $ 2 7 , 3 0 0 O R 2 7 . 9

AS/l/^'^^-/-^ SECURITY CLASSI F I C A T T O K SIFIE 5

Job Description Sheet SUBMITTED g ^ B o n l n l

TASK L E A D E R t lAYE


REVIEWED BY: SUB-CONTROL UNIT SUPVR.

APPROX. START AND FINISH O F JOB: START

CONTROL ORO.

CONTROL SUB-SE

MO. YR.

C. MOR.

FINISH:

D D D A T E

THIS L I N E TO BE USED BY F INANCE ONLY FOR CODINO

PRO&EU S.A. DET . COMP.

JOB TITLE FahHcAt-inn »f Folded Flow iteaetor (P122C1) and TOP Shield Plug for Usage in

C!TF-1 F a c i l i t y


Produce Folded Flow Reactor and new Top Shield Plug for usage in the CTF-1 Facility.

STATEMENT OF WORK ( I N C L U D E SUB-CONTROL'S RESPONSIBIL ITY, AUTHORIT IES D E L E O A T E D AND RESERVED)

Production of tooling and fabrication of fuel elements, moderatjor, reflectors, ducting, core structure, control elements and actuating mechanism, instirumentation, additional ranote handling equipment, and new top shield plug for insertion of the folded flow reactor in the CTF-1 Facility.


NO.

1

2

MILESTONE

Final design release (for information only)

Ship components to ITS

\

/

MO.IDAY

5

5

YR.

62

63


ANP S2a (3.81) CLASSIFIED

^S/v^-yS^-/yg

CONTROL ORO.



MAJOR COMPONENT:

MINOR COMPONENT:

WORD DESCRIPTION OF J O B : .

D D

^''^

JOB PLANNING SHEET 5

. SUB-MINOR COMPONENT:


, S U B - C O N T R O L ORGNZ:

- P R O G R A M E L E M E N T ;


WORK CLASSe


JOB NO. 1

1 P N MAJ. MIN. SUBM. S.fLD i u 8 - e c • c -KWitL S.A. DET. COMP.

rf—— ^^^•^

c~> i r r :

C X 5 -n m

ORIGINAL JOB PLANNING SHEET RESOURCES

LABOR

0 1

0 2

03

0 4

11

12

ts

14

IS

21

22

N O


Pro.lect ITS

T O T A L ES a E (TE)

TECHNICAL ASSi ST ANTS (E A.)

Pro,1ect TTS

\ 5

y X

UNIT PERF. NUMBER

^ 3

^ /

n 0

O

o


J A S . 1 9 6 1 O N D . 1961 J F M - 1962

1 .

1 *

X

X 4 3

Z' /

n 0

n\ n\

\ • T O T A L T E C H . ASST, | | •

DRAFTINO

Tool Design

T O T A L DRAFTING

MANUFACTURINO - PROD.

Manufacturing £h«ineerinK Shops ITS

T O T A L MFG. - PROD,

EXPENDITURES

DIR. MAT'L flr SERVICES


704 COMPUTER

NON-FUND ( B e & 7x

ODF 11


COMMITMENT BALANCE

DIR MAT'L & SERVICES



TE- EXPRESS MANPOWER TO THE NEAREST

• • • • • •

1»

1»

\A4 ,f 7

X X X

3 ^ ,

s f /

(\ ,? o

n • • •

• • •

3 , •

3 .

o 0 n

1 .

4 «

4 .

• • • •

j • •

T E N TH h I A N 3 71 E> P R E

• • •

SS DOLLARS

• • •

N THOUSANDS

.

.

.

, TO THE NEA

1 FISCAL Y E A R - 1963

A M J . I>B2

3 .

J A S - 1962

3 .

3 . 1 3 .

O N D . 1962

3 .

3 .

J F M - 1963

3.

3 .

2 .

2 .

2 . '

2 .

2 . 2 . '

• 2 . 1 2 .

5 . •

5 .

5 . •

5 .

5 . •

5 .

2 . •

2«

4 * 1 k* 10* A2 •

• • •

• • •

1 4 . D 46 .

4 . 67.

• • •

7 1 .

k • 72 •

• • •

7 6 .

32.

1 9 .

UO • • •

260 . •

370 •

1 6 0 . • •

1 0 0 . •

260 .

300 .

300.

• • •

REST TENTH;

• • •

E.O. t27,SO0

• • •

3R 27.3

• • •

A M J . 1969

2 .

4* •

• 6 .

2 . 4 .

• • •

6 .

1 . .

1 .

4 . 1 6 . 2 0 .

.

. 4 0 .

1 5 0 . • • • •

ISO.

.

.

.

FISCAL YEAR - 1964

J A S . I 9 S 9

4 .

4 .

O N D . 1969

-

J F M - 1964 A M J . 1964

• • •

. • !

1 4 . -

4 .

. ,

• • •

• • •

• • •

• •

•

^*

15. •

•

100.

10>

• •

•

• • .

• •

•

• •

Vl8/6i /^^<° 23

mmm JUSTIFICATION

Job No. AENF BB-1 U/lQ/^l

Is it underway No.

Status Investigated once previously as to feasibility of testing supersonic (P122C3) power plant but size restrictions and exhaust temperatures were quite severe. Preliminary studies (W/E 9/9/6l) indicate matching of CTF-1 to folded flow is practical .for lower temperatures and lower powers.

General applicability Useful for development into light weight, packaged power generating system at outputs of approximately J+O thermal MW for remote site usage. Operating as a closed cycle would alleviate problem of fission fragment contamination as system would be purged only when atmospheric conditions permit. Closed cycle operation would alleviate problem of wire screen blockage to sand and dust ingestion.

Why should it be done here CTF-1 and the Folded Flow Reactor were both conceived and designed at ANPD and the technology accumulated on the folded flow reactor plus our fabrication and operating experience on HTRE I & II would make us the logical choice.

mmim

CLASSIFIED y^<:ioe 2y

MANUFACTURING COSTS OF PROPOSED INSERTION OF FOLDED FLOW REACTOR INTO CTF-l

ANP Raw O.V. & Total Cost D.L. Hours Materials Fin. Mat'l (D.L. at 9.50)

I, A, Fuel Cartridges 1* Fuel Elements 2» Moderator 3» Reflector 4* Structure 5, Hot Ducts

B» Discharge Ducts & Annulus 1. Collector 2. Aft Annulus

C. Supporting Structure

D. Reflectors 1« Forward Reflectors 2« Aft Reflectors 3* Island Reflector

E. Controls Mechanism & Elements

II* Auxiliary Shell & Structure

HI. Inlet & Exit Transition Ducting

IV, Top Plug

V* Control System & Instrumentation

VI* Remote Handling

VII. Auxiliary Equipment

Total Mfg. Cost

63000 3000

1100 2200

11500 13000

850

144000 76000 40000 500

15250

5000 2575

16600

100000

16000

5000

742500 104500 140000 10950 57150

114000 123500

29600

4000 14550 8600

10000

3000

8000

5000

7640

1000

2000

133000 145738 57700

75000

4500

2A000

55000

10000

52000 83250 5000

40000

50000

—

3000

119200

81500

81000

223000 367100 144400

210500

83000

100000

105500

200000

100000

100000

$2,955,700

^CWSSIFIED

AENF BB-3 i + / l 8 / 6 l

5

SUBMITTED BY: TMK LBADtR

CLASSIFIED SECURITY CLASSIF ICATION


DATE

REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDBDl

CONTROL ORG.

eONTHfiU IUB.IBe. Man.

D D T . L . TASK

bAYE

REVIEWED BY: iUB-edNTKoL UNit SU^VR.

APPROX. START AND FINISH O F JOB: START MOT T R ^ FINISH: -5,5-.


PRO&EU S.A. DET . COMP.

JOB TITLE D u s t and D i r t Tnggat . lnn Ti!fff»pt.H i n Fnlf^Pt^ F low Bpnf>t.m-B


Evaluation of the effect of airborne solids on performance characteristics of folded flow reactors and the design of suitable separation systems. Report to be issued upon completion of evaluation.

STATEMENT OF WORK ( I N C L U D E SUB-CONTROL'S RESPONSIBIL ITY, AUTHORIT IES D E L E O A T E D AND RESERVED)

1. Perform dust ingestion tests by blowing dust laden air through various folded flow fuel element configurations. Evaluate amount and performance effects of dust buildup on or ahead of fuel elements.

2. Investigate means of altering reactor component configurations and/or ducting to minimize dust retention and performance penalties.

3. Design, build, and test separating equipment to control dust ingestion by reactor coniponents to levels found acceptable.by investigations in the above areas.


M I L E S T O N E

Complete preliminary investigation of dust retention and performance effects in various component configurations.

Complete first tests of several dust separation systems.

Complete tests of altered component configurations to minimize dust retention.

Complete report on modified dust separation systems.


10

12

h

31 6 l

31

3C

3C

61

62

62

ANP 628 (S-St) SSIFIED

/^^^/f/^^^S^Vl8/6l

CONTROL OIIB.

PURPOSE OP E F P O B T !

PRODUCT N O M E H C L A T U R C : .

MAJOR COMPONENT:

MINOR COMPONENT:

WORD DESCRIPT ION OP J Q * :

D D

^ ^ "&'

m JOB PLANNINO SHHT

5

. SUS-MINOR COMPONENT: .


. S U B - C O N T R O L ORONZ; _ 1



CONTRACTl >ORK CLASH

THIS LINE TO BE USED BY FINANCE ONLY FOR CODtNO

JOB NO. 1 r ASK NO. P F P N MAJ. MIN. SUBM. S.FLD

•

SUB-C C • c MWftB. S.A. DET. COMP.

ORIGINAL JOB PLANNING SHSr RESOURCES

LABOR

0

0 2

OS

0 4

1 M n

\t

IS

14

19

21

2 2

N O

CXKMFT SCI. » ENO. PERS. (T.E.)

Mechanical Design

T O T A L ES a E ( T E )



DRAFTINO

T O T A L DRAFTING


T O T A L MFG. - PHOO.

EXPENDITURES



704 COMPUTER

NON-FUND

ODF II


COMMITMENT BALANCE


\ \

X

UNIT PERF, NUMBER

It 3 8 2

FISCAL YEAR- 19QC 1

0 j A S - i » e x

•

• •

•

• •

0 O N D . i s a x

1 J F M - 1»SX

1 A M J - 19CX

2.5

FISCAL YEAR- 19« 2 \ FISCAL YEAR - 1 9 * 3

1 J A S . I B S k

3 . 0

1 O M O - 1 t ^

.3.0

2 J F M . IBSX

3 . 0

• •

• •

2 A M J . 1 » C X

3 B O

• •

• •

2 J A » . 1»flfX

2 O N D . I » V

0

J F M . 1984 A M J . 1964

h 3 fl ? n • R

.

.

.

.

. 1 .

p«n p • n P»n

h Ci 7 ( • •

•

• •

•

• •

•

1 •n •

n • ()

.

. 1 .

1 » f l

.

.

1 • n •

•

T»o

• • •

. 1 .

• •

•

• •

•

• •

•

V ^ =s ^ 0 • s

• 1

^•a 1 " 0 ! • 0 • •

•

•

. 0 .

. • 1

•3

• 1

»(,

• 1

• 6

• 1 1 •

• H •

. 6 • •

•

• • • •

• •

• • • •

1 . SUB-CONTRACTS k C.A | 1 •

T O T A L COMMIT B A L A N C E 1 1 ,

T E. EXPRESS MANPOWER TO THE NEAREST T E N TH fc I A N J. 7) E> P R E SS DOLLARS

•

•

•

N THOUSANDS

•

•

•

. TO THE NEA

•

•

•

REST TENTH;

.

.

.

E.a. $27,S00

.

.

.

OR I7.S

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

. 1 .

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

imssra "*'"' JUSTIFICATION

Job No. AENF BB-3 ^/l8/6l

Is it underway.

No

Status.

Literature surveys have been conducted and several proposed designs have been laid out for the purpose of studying their effectiveness, applicability, and performance penalties when applied to air breathing apparatus.

General applicability.

Could be used to remove sand, grit and dust from air entering air cooled reactors and other apparatus breathing atmospheric air in large quantities. Mightalso be applied where atmospheric air is utilized in a secondary cooling circuit.

Why should it be done here.

Particular applications will probably have efficiency requirements and performance penalty limitations which are unique to these applications and rule out the possibility of utilizing commercially available equipment. Personnel in other Company departments have already worked with us in determining the aerodynamic and thermocynamic effects of dust and grit deposition on heat transfer surfaces.

Air flow systems and operators are available in the Department with means of adding grit as may be required. These loops can be operated both cold and up to 2500°F.

mmmi

AENF BB-1+ V 1 8 / 6 I

5

SUBMITTED

TASK LEABIR

'Moi mm y^sa " 2S "S SECURITY CLASSIF ICATION

Job Description Slieet CONTROL ORO. D D T . L . TA»K

REVIEWED AND

T n m RECOMMENDED. e P N T w a L « u n i e . Maw. BATH

REVIEWED BY: iUl.eaNTH6L UMIT tUFVh.

APPROX. START AND FINISH O F JOB) START irer -ywr •''"'•»'-uor T I T


PROS.EU * . A i OET. COMP.

JOB TITLE TTjgh q'ompaT'a-h.iiT'o TJnr.-T.iihT^-i PR-h.ari -RPRT-ingB f<vr B o l l - l n g F r j fftjon "In C i r c u l a t i n g

Solid Fuel Reactors. .

JOB O B J I C T I V I ( R I L A T I O N I H I P TO PRODUCT (HARDWARI ) OR NON-PRODUCT (NON-HARDWARI) O I V I L O P M I N T i F INAL R I I U L T I X P I C T I D O F THIS JOB

Report covering design and test results to evaluate feasibility of operating unlubricated bearings at 1200°F under nuclear radiation.

STATEMENT OF WORK ( I N C L U D E SUB-CONTROL'S R B S P O N S I B I H T Y , AUTHORIT IES D E L E O A T E D AND RESERVED)

Bearings to be developed are relatively slow speed but fairly long life (up to 10,000 hours at 10 RPS). Bearing materials that have been evaluated for sliding friction are to be screened for this application. Combinations of materials for usage in a dual bearing may have to be provided to cover the entire temperature range from room temperature to 1200°F.

JOB M ILESTONES ( R E F E R E N C E M I L E S T O N E EXAMPLES ON P AO E 2 O F D E P A R T M E N T INSTRUCTION X-2)

M I L E S T O N E MO,

Establish feasibility of operating bearings up to 1200°F in a non-lubricated application. Summary of test results and report due as to feasibility.

Selected bearing prototype fabricated and available for up to 10,000 hour test at 1200OF.

62

62

SECURITY C L A S S I F I C A T I O N

ANP S2S <S.8I) u CLASSIFIED

A^/^/' ^yS^

CONTROL ORO. D D

PURPOSE OF E F F O R T ;


MAJOR COMPONENT:

MINOR COMPONENT:

WORD DESCRIPTION OF J O E : .

J O l PLANNING SHEIT

^.^ m 5

. SUS-MINOR COMPONENT: .

. S C I E N T I F I C F I C L O :




CONTRACT: WORK CLASli


JOfl NO. rASK NO. P F P N MAJ. MIN. SUBM. S.FLD SUB-C C WC PHIWEL S.A. DET. COMP.


LABOR

0 1

0 2

OS

0 4

=-

1 1

12

IS

14

15

21

22

N O

EXEMPT SCI. ft ENO. PERS. (T.E.*

M e c h a n i c a l D e s i p p

T O T A L ES ft E (TE)


T O T A L T E C H , ASST,

DRAFTING

T O T A L DRAFTING

MANUFACTURINO - P R O a


EXPENDITURES



704 COMPUTER

NON-FUND

OOF II


COMMITMENT BALANCE

DIP. MAT'L & SERVICES

SUB-CONTRACTS » C.A



i P

i < z

UNIT PERF. NUMBER

h 3 8 2


0 J A S . 1 9 C C

0 O N D . 19SX

1 J F M - TSOS

• B

B

B

• B

1 A M J - I S B X

1 ,


1 J A S - I S O

Iw

1 O N D . lasX

1 ,

2 J F M . 1 San

1 ,

2 A M J . I S M

1 ,

•

FISCAL YEAR - 1964 J

J A S . 1S6S

,

O N D . 1S8S J F M . IS64 A M J . 1984

k S R ? *

B

B

• B

• B

! • 1 .

. 1 .

1 . 1 . 1 . B

B

• •

k • Y . ' . • •

• • •

B

B

B

S« B

B

5 . B

B

5* B

B

5.

.

.

5. B

B

B

B

.

B

B

B

B

• B

B

B

•

^ S ^ 0 •5 •5

•

•5 . 2 .3

•1 . 1 . 1 . 1 B

B

B

B

• B

T E N TH i. A N 3.7! E> CPRE

• • B

SS DOLLARS

• • •

N THOUSANDS

B

B

B

, TO THE NEA

B

B

.

. .

REST TENTH; E.O. $27,300

.

.

.

3H 27.3

.

.

.

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

•

B

B

•

B

B

•

V19/61 'INCUSSIFIrU 2^^^^ eo

JUSTIFICATION

Job No. AENF BB-i+

I s i t underway.

No

S t a t u s .

WorV is just being initiated to investigate rolling friction requirements on unlubricated bearing applications.

General applicability.

Could be used in any reactor application where control drums are to be rotated or in the A115D where the fuel elements are to be rotated in and out of the core region to allow primary heat generation to occur in a smaller active core volume and heat removal at a more advantageous location. Speeds envisioned are 10 RPS and life requirements in the order of 500 hours.

Why should it be done here.

Hig^ temperature bearing studies have been carried on in the Department for a number cjf years as to sliding friction at these temperatures. Test apparatus such as furnaces and torque measuring devices are available within the Department to allow an orderly investigation into combinations of materials that appear attractive from room temperature to 1500°F. Data has been accumulated in the Department as to wear rates, deposition rates, galling characteristics, and coefficients of friction of a great many high temperature materials to date which could be screened for this application.

CUSSIFIED

AENF RM-1 l^/l8/6l

5

SUBMITTED

T A i K L E A D E R

SECURITY CLASSIF ICATION ^CUSSIFIED y^&Qc s^

" ^


t>At^


CONTROL ORO.

CdNTRdL lUB-See. MSH.

D D T . L . TASK

REVIEWED BY: SUB-CONTROL UNIT SUPVR.

APPROX. START AND FINISH O F JOB: START SJST -far " '*"= -Tusr

THIS L I N E TO BE USED BY F I N A N C E ONLY FOR CODING

PRO&EL S.A. D E T . COMP.

JOB TITLE Re-eva1nation and Comparison of GE-ANFD Power Plant Designs


Issue repor t e n t i t l e d "Re-evaluation and Comparison of GE-ANPD Fewer Plant Designs."

STATEMENT OF WORK ( I N C L U D E SUB-CONTROL'S RESPONSIBIL ITY, AUTHORIT IES D E L E G A T E D AND RESERVED)

1. Review the various power plants proposed within and studied by ANPD, and prepare a bibliography of descriptive and design analysis reports issued.

2. Determine methods of comparing performance of ANPD power plants which will suitably account for their different characteristics. Particular attention will be given to non-dimensional parameters and the relation of known material properties with the requirements of the reactor. Such properties include, but are not limited to, stress, temperature-time characteristics, fission product retention, and oxidation resistance.

3. Parameters describing performance of the power plants such as thrust-to-weight, thrust per unit frontal area will be evaluated at a single design point and at a limited number of other conditions such as take-off, cruise, and military power settings.

k. Issue a report summarizing the results in a convenient form for direct comparison.

JOB MILESTONES (R E F E R E N C E MIL ESTON E EXAMPLES ON P A G E 2 O F D E P A R T M E N T INSTRUCTION X-2)


Issue r e p o r t . 62

ANP a2«(S.61)


iNCUSSIFIED

-i XJ^^-^^^^'-"

CONTROL ORO.


PRODUCT NOMENCLATURE: .

KlAJOR COMPONENT:

MINOR COMPONENT:


D D JOB PLANNINO SHEET

y°^^ 3-2

5

. SUB-MtNOR COMPONENT:


^SUB-CONTROL ORGNZ: _

- P R O G R A M E L E M E N T : —



THIS LINE TO BE USED BY FINANCE ONLY FOR COCHNO

JOB NO. 1 ASK NO. P F P N MAJ. MIN. SUBM. SLFLD SUB.C C WC f "Oft EU S.A. DET. COMP.

ORIGINAL JOB PUNNING SHEET RESOURCES

LABOR

0 1

OZ

OS

0 4

1 1

12

IS

14

18

21

22

N O

EXEMPT SCI. ft ENO. PERS, (T.E.)

/)r/ys.27/^(^£/in. j<j^,iA'.y\\ r^ffr^^<A ,^r.,^ ^ a ^ ,

T O T A L ES » E (TE)

TECHNICAL ASSIST ANTS (EA.I

,4<yy ./^•^/y^eif^f-J^in A^>^/i/.<;/' O (U ^


DRAFTINO

T O T A L DRAFTING

MANUFACTURINO . PROD.

*

' T O T A L MFG. - PROD.

EXPENDITURES

DIR. MAT'L B SERVICES

SUB-CONTRACTS ft C.A,

704 COMPUTER

NON-FUND

ODF II


COMMITMENT BALANCE




FE: EXPRESS MANPOWER TO THE NEAREST

\ 5 <

X

, UNIT PERF, NUMBER

-^ ,? c9 ,

FISCAL YEAR. \pji^ I 9 6 I

J A S - 1 9 6 1

B

B

B

B

O N D - 1061 J F M - 1962 A M j } ^ ^

1 • S

B

B

B_..

FISCAL YEAR- ^ ^ 1 9 6 2

1961 J A S . ^ / /

1 B S

B

B

_«_..

• I . 5 I 1 . ^

1962 O H D - / ^

3 B S

B

B

B

B

! • •?

1962 J F M . ^ / /

l a 5 a

a

a

a

1 • 5

A M J - 1 9 6 3

F I S C A L Y E A R - 1964 |

J A S - 196S O N D - 1963 J F M . 1964

a

a

• • a

A M J . 1964

^ a

a

• a

X ^ ,? (9 .? 1 •(" . • . •

1 "D

• B

a

B

T • HI 1 Bn

^^ n

• a

a

a

1 * n

1 • 0 a

• a

a

1 • 0

a

a

a

a

a

a

__. _... _ __. .. _ . __. _ _.. _. __ _. _l .

B

B

B

• •

B

B

B

. .

. .

. .

a a

a

a

a

•

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

•

1

B

• • B

B

B . . a

1

•

B

• B

T E N TH K A N 3.7) E> P R E SS DOLLARS

B

B

•

N THOUSANDS

B

B

B

TO THE NEA

.

.

.

REST TENTH;

B

B

B

E.a. $27.S00

a

a

a

3R 27.S

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

•

a

a

a

a

a

•

a

a

V18/61 llMnH^SlHHl ^^d^ ^

JUSTIFICATION

Job No. /l^y^A-A'X^ '/

(1) Is it underway . . .

Not actively, although previous work done in Technical Design

will form the basis for most of the groundwork required.

(2) Status . . .

Some reports have been issued and machine cataloging has been done

sxommarizing power plants, but this work has not been briefly

digested nor has discussion or conclusions been made with regard

to applications of specific or general interest.

(3) General applicability . . .

This work is of interest in the sense of avoiding the re-invention

of old ideas in future aircraft applications or in applications of

more interest today.

(U) Why should it be done here . . .

Strictly concerned with GE-ANPD power plants.

AENF RM-2 U/19/61

5

SUBMITTED BY: TASk LeAbBtt

REVIEWED BY: SUB.CONTROL UNIT SUPVR.

INCLASSIFIE SECURITY CLASSIF ICATION


DATE



coKiTRdL auB-see.

r Md. YR.

MAR.

FINISH:

2>a^e 3^/

D D T . L . TASK

D A T E

THIS LINE TO BE USED BY FINANCE ONLY FOR CODING

PRO&EU S.A. DET. COMP.

JOB TITLE Nuclear and Thermal Desism Studies^afJBeO - Y-,0-2 3

- UO - ZrO Ceramic Reactors


Issue a report including parametric design charts for preliminary design selection of BeO - Y2O3 - UO2 - ZrOp reactors for a broad range of applications. Delineate the range of required materials development.


1. Conduct literature s\irvey to compile bibliography and abstract pertinent data and analysis methods. Scope the specific methods to be used that are already established, and delineate improvements required in nuclear and aerothermal areas to include wide range of BeO concentration, geometrical arrangements, performance requirements and coolants.

2. Develop and correlate new methods of analysis in areas required, using available information and experimental data, and make design layouts of various reactor arrangements.

3. Perform necessary analysis and construct parametric design charts in suitable form for nuclear-aerothermal design estimation for a wide variety of applications.

h. Issue report.

See detailed description, attached.

JOB MILESTONES ( R B F B R g N C E M I L E S T O N E EXAMPLES ON PAOB 2 O F D E P A R T M E N T INSTRUCTION X-2)

NO.

1

2

3

)\

5

MILESTONE

Finish item 1, above, and issue report .

Issue interim report on item 2, above, and in i t i a t e work on item 3»

Issue f inal report on item 2.

Complete analysis and construction of charts.

Issue report .

MO.

7

LO

1

5

6

DAY

1

1

1

1

30

YR.

6 1

6 1

6 1

62

62


ANP 628 (3 .8 I) NCU88IF1ED

V19/61 Job AENF RM-2

CONTROL OHO. D n

PUnPOSE OF E F F O R T :

P X O D U C T N O M E N C L A T U R E : .

MAJOR C O M P O N E N T :

MINOR COMPONENT:

WORD DESCRIPT ION O F JOB:

JOB PLANNING SHEiT



. S U B - C O N T R O L O R O N Z :

. P R O O R A M E L E M E N T :

y°dl9 <? ^ ^

5


CONTRACT! WORK CLASS:

THIS LINE TO BE USED BY FINANCE ONLY FOR CODtNO

r ASK NO. F C F N MAJ. MIN. SUBM. S.FLD c WC piioe. EL I * . DET. COMF.


LABOR

0 1

—

0 2

OS

0 4

11

12

13

U

IS

21

22


Aprn+.hPrTTir i l A n n ! y f l 1 fi

• n p R i g n p ; n £ ^ " ' = " * f " i " £

s t r e s s A n a l v s i s



A n a l y s n ' . t ;

T O T A L T E C H . ASST,

DRAFTINO

Layouts

T O T A L D R A F T I N O

MANUFACTURING - P R O a


EXPENDITURES

DIR. MAT'L B SERVICES

SUB-CONTRACTS » C.A.

704 COMPUTER

NON-FUND

ODF II


COMMITMENT BALANCE

DIP. MAT'L & SERVICES


\ < X

X X X

UNIT PERF. NUMBER

h if It h

^ ^ ^ • \

8

8 fi 8

^ ^ ? 2

FISCAL YEAR- ) ^ I 9 6 I

J A S . 1 s a l O N D . t»S1 J F M - 1962

1961 A M J . / / / /

2 . 0

1 . 0 1 . 0

.

. k •O

FISCAL YEAR- / j (9^ 1962 1961

6 ^

2 B 0

2BO

1.0

. l l s O

196|L 1962 O N D . / / / / J F M . / / / * '

6 . 0

h,0

2 . 0

1 . 0 B

1 ^ . 0

^ . 0

I t . 0

2 . 0 1 . 0

B

1 1 . 0

1962 A M J . / / / /

^ . 0

It . 0 2 . 0

1 . 0

B

11 • o

FISCAL YEAR - 1964 ,

J A S . 1S6S O N D . 1SSS J F M . 19«4

• B

B

r • * " B

A M J . 1»S4

X It • \ fl ^ . • . • , .

B

• B

B

• B

1 . 0

1 . 0

1.0

.

.

. •

1.0

1 . 0

1 . 0

I t . 0

i t . 0

4 B O

B

B

B

• 1+ B O

B

B

B

B

• B

X \ •p 7 6 . . .

B

B

B

B

B

•

B

B

B

1.0

. 1.0

1 . 0

B

1 » 0

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

•

B

B

B

.

B

• B

B

B

B

.

0

•

, B B

B B

B

B

B

B

15 . 0 . .

TS . 0

B

B

1 5 * 0 B

B

1 5 * 0

B

B

10 BO

B

B

10*0

B

B

5 . 0

B

B

^ • 0

T O T A L COMMIT B A L A N C E \

.

. •

• B

.

B

B

B

B

B

•

.

.

.

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

•

B

B

NOT E. EXPRESS MANPOWER TO THE NEAREST TENTH MAN (3 7). EXPRESS DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS. TO THE NEAREST TENTHj E.O. f27,800 OR 27.3

ymsiFiED --- X^'di^e 3^

JUSTIFICATION

Job AENF RM-2

(l) Is it underway

This work is not specifically covered now but represents an extension of work done for the Dl +OE. The additional facets include use of a wide range of BeO concentration and incorporation of methods for compacting the core.

(2) Status . . .

A wide base of work has been done on the BeO system, aimed specifically at the DlUOE arrangement, but little work has been done to consolidate the available information or to extend its general utility.


The general applicability of this job is a primary objective to permit use in parametric work.

iS) Why should it be done here , . .

The work should be done here because of the accumulated experience in the design of BeO systems at GE-ANPD.

ICUSSIFIED ^^^e 3

Job Titlet Devise Improved Methods of Nuclear emd Theroodynamic Analysis of BeO - Y2O3 - UO2 - Zr02 Reactors

General Factors to be Considered;

(1) Range of over-all dimensions

(2) Fuel inventory

(3) Material ccanpositicn including structure

(U) Materials and coolant temperatures

($) Configuration effects on nuclear analysis

(a)* Incliision of shaft (b) Location of control elements (c)* Split and folded flow arrangements (d) Location of structure (e) General reflector effects

(6) Configuration effects on thermal analysis

(a) Flow distribution in split and folded flow arrangements (b) Structure cooling and bypass requirenents in split and folded flow

arrangements (c) Fuel element configuration

(7) Prediction of temperature perturbations

(a) Dimensional tolerance effects

(b) Flow and power perturbations

(8) Types of coolant

(9)* Continued work on ODD for BeO systems

(10)* Check range of validity of Diffusion Theory programs for Hard Spectrum Reactors.

(11)* Nuclear effect of coolant (hydrogen and steam)

Statement of Work

(A) Improving analytical methods

(1) Determine scope of work to improve analytical methods (a) Nuclear effects of shaft

(1) Split and folded flow effect on nuclear analysis (2) Nuclear effect of coolant

* Factors requiring new or improved methods of analysis.

ymssiFiED

lIHCliSHD ..f^s' (2) Conduct l i t e ra ture survey on work to improve analytical methods.

(a) Nuclear effects on shaft (b) Diffiision theory check of Hard Spectrum Reactors (c) Nuclear effects of coolant (d) Split and folded flow airangeraents

(3) Dsvise the improved methods.

Parametric analysis and graphical representation

(1) Variables to be considered (a) Reactor and over-all dimensions (b) Material composition (c) Material temperatures as a function of composition (d) Coolant temperatures as a function of composition (e) Core reflector size combinations (f) Structure requirements as a fiinction of configuration (g) Shapes and size ranges of fuel element channels (h) Limit of dimensional, power and flow deviations ( i ) Coolant pressure limits ( j ) Reactivity requirements

(2) Nuclear design charts

(a) Two-group constants as a function of void volume fraction, f\iel loading, material composition, structure and xenon

(b) Graphical representations of fuel concentration - reflector thickness interactions on power distribution

(c) Reactivity requirements as a function of material comjiosition, reflector configuration and power-life considerations

(d) Core diameter vs. length for constant App for given k^ff, material composition and poison

(3) Thermal design charts

(a) Bypass cooling requirements as a function of degree of flow splitting or core compacting

(b) Thermal charts for various cooling channel shapes and sizes, cruciform, rod interstices, etc.

(c) Turning losses as a function of pertinent parameters for split and folded flow systems

(d) Flow distribution variations due to coolant turning (e) Temperature perturbations: Percent change in Tgjj vs. percent change

in3.ID, flats, power, flow (f) Thermal charts for various coolants

ymsra

AENF TS-1 k/lQ/Gl

5

SUBMITTED „ „ . ,

OMCUSflED SECURITY CLASSIF ICATION

Job Description Sheet REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED:

CONTROL ORO.

e6NTft6L iut-aee. Man.

X^^ge 39

D D T . L . TASK

DATE

REVIEWED BY: SUb-eONTf tOL UNIT SUPVR.

APPROX. START AND FINISH O F JOB: START scar TRT

FINISH: TSST


PROGXL S.A. D E T . COMP.

JOB TITLE 3-Knriy •F.valiiftt.p 'ThpT-mnl nnri Mpphani pal Tlpsi gn PT-J tp- r i a f m - Mnn-mndprat ing

Reactors Fueled with Rhombohedral Phase UOg Q-'^Y-O-.


To obtain information MBlative to the thermal and mechanical design requirements of non-moderating reactors fueled with Y20o/U0p.

STATEMENT O F WORK ( I N C L U D E SUB-CONTROL'S RESPONSIBIL ITY, AUTHORIT IES D E L E q A T E D AND RESERVED)

Conduct analytic and design studies to evaluate the thermal and mechanical design requirements of non-moderating reactors fueled with Rhombohedral Phase UO Q-SY^O

and used for h i ^ performance propulsion and/or mobile power generation in'aerospace and/or underwater environments. Reactor design variables are to include:

Diameters from 20" to 50" Length from 20" to 50" Bulk gas temperatures 2000F to i OOOF Coolant air, hydrogen, neon and helium Various reflectors including ZrO , AlpO , BeO, Fe and Ni.


INQ. M I L E S T O N E

•

MO. DAY YR.


ANP a2a (S.6I ) NCUSSIFIED

it/i8/6i

CONTBOL 0 » f l .

PURPOSE OF E F F O R T ;

PRODUCT N O M E N C L A T U R C : .

MAJOR COMPONENT:

MINOR COMPONENT:

WORD DESCRIPTION OF JOB:_

T.L. TASK

JOB PLANNING SHEET

. SUB-MINOR COMPONENT: .


.SUB-CONTROL ORONZ:

-PROORAM ELEMENT:

AEMF TS-1 y^<3^e -^o

5


CONTRACTl WORK CLASS

THIS LINE TO BE USED BY FINANCE ONLY POR COOINa

JOS NO. r ASK NO. F F P N MAJ. MIN. S U M . t F L D _ SUS-C C . C n 0 6 E L S.A. DET. COMP.

ORIGIh4AL JOB PLANNINO SHEET ! RESOURCES

0 1

0 2

OS

0 4

1 1

IX

IS

14

»

21

2 2

N O

LABOR

EXEMPT SCI. ft ENO. PERS. <T.E.)

Reactor P h v s i c l s t Thermo Dynamic is t

M p r h . • p l n ^ r .

T O T A L ES & E ( T E l

TECHNICAL ASSIST ANTS <E A.)

General E.A.


DRAFTINO

DesiKner

T O T A L DRAFTINO

MANUFACTURINO- PROD.

»

, T O T A L MFO. - PROD.

EXPENDITURES

DIR. MAT'L » SERVICES


704 COMPUTER H o u T s / Q u a r t e r

NO H-FUND

ODF II


COMMITMENT BALANCE

DIR, MAT'L ft SERVICES

\ 1 1

.,

P

1 UNIT PERF.

NUMBER

4 4 4

i 3 ,?

./ <? d

• * '

3 4

FISCAL YEAR- J ^ / I 9 6 I

J A S . 1 9 6 1

• • • • • •

O N Q . IBS1 J F M - 1962 A M J - 1962

• 7 • 7 • 7

• • •

FISCAL YEAR- /5<^ I962

J A S . I S S 2

1 . 0

1 . 0 1 . 0

• • .

O N D - 1962

1. 0

] » 0 ]»0

. * •

J F M . 196S A M J . 1961

FISCAL YEAR - 1964

J A S . 1 9 6 9 O N D . I9«S J F M - 1964

•

A M J - 1964

• • 1

K 4 ,- fi •{ • 7 1 0 • • • • • •

• • • •

1«0 • • • • • •

• • 4

•

•

X 4 <T 7 (, • • •

• • •

• • •

• 7 •

1.0 •

. 1 .

l i O • •

• • •

• • • • • •

• • •

• B

•

B

B

•

t •

'

!

SUB-CONTRACTS ft C.A. 1

T O T A L COMMIT. B A L A N C E |

r E : EXPRESS MANPOWER TO THE NEAREST T E N TH « A N s.7) E> CPRE

2 0 .

• •

3a • * •

• •

30.

• • •

• • • • • •

• • • • • •

• • •

SS DOLLARS 1

• • •

N THOUSANDS

• • •

. TO THE NEA

• • •

REST TENTH;

« • .

E.O. «17,>«l

• • •

3R 27.S

• • •

• • •

• • •

• •

• B

•

B

B

u/10/61 ICUSSIFIED ^^s^ ^y

JUSTIFICATION

Job No. AEHir Ti ' I H //»/c f

1, Is i t underway? Yes

2, S ta tus :

Preliminary e f for t has been applied to specif ic systems which wil l form the basis for a more general parametric design study.

3 , General app l i cab i l i ty :

This study wi l l be applicable to the designs of reactors for many types of high performance nuclear powered systems.

ii. Why shoxild i t be done here?

a. Development work on the material i s being done here.

b . Experienced i n ;

(1) Methods for nuclear analysis by computer-programmed transport theory developed he re .

(2) Methods for heat t ransfer , thermodynamic, mechanical design and s t r e s s analysis on gas-cooled r eac to r s .

mSlFIED

AENF TS-2 U/18/61

ONCUSSIFIED SECURITY CLASSIF ICAT ION

5

SUBMITTED T . -?XtK^!^EybER


2^2gi- -^2

D D T . L . TASK


REVIEWED BY: iUt .66NTI IOL UNlY S U P V R .


CONTROL

MA.

iUB-SEC.

YR.

MdR.

FINISH: TiiSr


PR06£U S.A. _ D E T . COMP.

JOB TITLE P r o p o s a l t o ITndf i r takp P T - P I Inn'nflT-y DpRTgn n f Rn Tnrpr'nvprl Vrvjo-r P l a n t . -FI-IT-

A p p U f n t . i nn t.n RT.AM. _ _

JOB O B J E C T I V E (RELATIONSHIP TO PRODUCT (HARDWARE) OR NON-PRODUCT (NON-HARDWARE) D E V E L O P M E N T ; F I N A L RESULT E X P E C T E D O F THIS JOB

To obtain funded contract from AF/AEC to develop the preliminary design of a power plant for the SIAM system based on the use of Y O^/UO in an unmoderated reactor operating at a higher temperature than fueled BeO ih order to improve performance.

STATEMENT O F WORK ( I N C L U D E SUB-CONTROL'S RESPONSIBIL ITY, AUTHORIT IES D E L E O A T E D AND RESERVEb)

Perform reactor, mechanical, aero-thermodynamic and materials development and design studies to yield the preliminary design of a reactor and power plant for the SIAM system based on the use of YoOo/UOp for fuel element material in an unmoderated reactor operating at a higher temperature than fueled BeO is capable of so that improved performance is obtained. This Improved performance may be used to reduce the SLAM size, reduce launch-booster requirements and/or increase flight speed and off-design thrust, and shorten development time.



y

MO. DAY YR.

SECURITY C L A S S I F I C A T I O N

ANP S28 (3 .« t ) NCU\SSIFIED

4/18/61 - T. Szekely

CONTROL ORO.

PURPOSE O F E F F O R T :


MAJOR COMPONENT:

MINOR COMPONENT:


JOB PLANNING SHEiT SIAM IMPROVED DES. 5

. SUB.MINOR C O M P O N E N T : .


_SUB.CONTROL ORGNZ:



CONTRACT: __ WORK CLASS:


JOB NO. 1 r ASK NO. P E P N MAJ. MIN. SUBM. S.FLD SUB-C c WC PKO&EL S.A. DET. COMP.


LABOR

0 t

0 2

OS

0 4

I I

12

IS

14

IS

21

2 2

N O

EXEMPT SCI. » ENO. PERS, <T.E.>

Advanced Enaineer inK

T O T A L ES » E (TE)


Ativannftfi RnginRf^riTig

T O T A L T E C H , ASST.

DRAFTINO

riPR-l g n R^i - i r i P P R

I l l u s t r a t i o n T O T A L DRAFTING


T O T A L MFO. - PROD.

EXPENDITURES



704 COMPUTER

NON*FUNO

ODF It


COMMITMENT BALANCE

DIR. MAT'L & SERVICES

SUB-CONTRACTS k C.A.


T E: EXPRESS MANPOWER TO THE NEAREST

tal

t <

X

UNIT PERF. NUMBER

h ^ 8 0

FISCAL YEAR-/5<9S5' I 9 6 I

J A S - 1*S1 O N D . IS81 J F M . 1»»2 A M J . 1962

2 ,

2«

FISCAL YEAR- \^j,-^ I962

J A S . 1962

3 . 0

B

B

• B

3 . 0

O N D - 1962

3 .

• ^ •

J F M . 1963

h ,

1+ .

A M J - 1 9 6 9

u.

u.

FISCAL YEAR - 1964

J A S - 1963 O N D . 1963

\

*

J F M - 1964

B

B

B

• B

A M J - 1964 ;

• 1 _. ... _._ _ ___ ._ .__ . . . . _ . . _ _ .

I f it • \ 8 0 • • • *

.

2 .

2 •

3 » . . . •

3 .

3 •

3 .

3 .

3 .

3.

3.

B

B

B

B

B

B

X

X

4 4

s 2

7 ?

6 \

• . •

• . •

• • •

1 .0 1 . 0

? 0

1 . 0 1 . 0

2 . 0

2 . 0 1 . 0

S . 0

2 . 0 1 . 0

^ . 0

2 . 0 1.0

3.0

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

•

•

T E N TH II <AN 3.7) E ) IPRE

• •

I •

SS DOLLARS

. • •

N THOUSANDS

• • •

. TO THE NEA

* * • I • • B •

REST TENTH; E.O. $27,300

B

B

B

OR 27.S

.

.

.

B

• B

1 B

B

i •

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

JUSTIFI CATIOH

Job AENF TS-2

Is it underway No.

Status Feasibility and preliminary design considerations done

by T. Szekely working part-time only and the work effort has been

teniporeurily suspended to finish a report on the A-136 Turbo-Ram.

General Application

1. Second generation SIAM - with lesser booster.

2. SIAM interceptor.

3. Dual purpose system; SIAM plus high-altitude hypersonic

application.

Why should it be done here

1. Materials effort underway here.

2. SIAM concept and early work innovated here.

3« Hiis system innovated here.

I

ONCLASSIFIED

V18/61

^^^^-/r^/V,/,8/6i

5 ' - •

SUBMITTED BY: ^- ^Xil^^mw


CONTROL OR(J. Job Description Sheet . , Q , ^ REVIEWED AND

VBX^9/""' RECOMMENDED: e6MTR6L iUB-See. MOft.

Cy

D D T . L .

D A T E

REVIEWED BY:

SUB-CONTROL UNIT SUPVR.


PWOG.EL.

APPROX. START AND FINISH O F JOB: S T A R T ^ ^ ^ H l y V\^ FINISH: ' I ^ ^ J y P ^

S.A. D E T . COMP.

JOB T I T L E • D f t f l i g r n R t . n r i y n-F R n t . a t . T n g T ^ i p l R f t a n t . m - s

JOB O B J E C T I V E (RELATIONSHIP TO PRODUCT (HARDWARE) OR NON-PRODUCT (NON-HARDWARE) D E V E L O P M E N T ; F INAL RESULT E X P E C T E D OF THIS JOB

To demonstrate the feas^^bility and utility of rotating fuel reactors, to establish the dimensions, materials, pressures, temperatures, nuclear features, stresses, to produce drawings of this class of reactors, to compare their performance with that of other competitive reactor types. To complete a preliminary design of one rotating fuel reactor

STATEMENT OF WORK ( I N C L U D E SUB-CONTROL'S RESPONSIBIL ITY, AUTHORIT IES D E L E O A T E D AND RESERVED) ^

1 . Review current reactor need^, compare these needs with the performance potential of rotating fuel realtors, and select those systems which might benefit most by incorporation of a rotating fuel reactor. Issue tentative design specifications for several selected nuclear power systems incorporating a rotating fuel reactor.

3. Perform nuclear, thermodynamic and mechanical analysis on these selected systems to form a preliminary idea of their feasibility. From this work select the system or systems that are most promising and perform a more intensive design study in this area. Issue a detailed power plant specifications report. Perform a detailed nuclear analysis to determine reactivity requirements, power distributions, fuel loadings, control effects, bvirn-up, xenon, etc. Perform a thermodynamic analysis to determine temperatures of fuel elements, moderator, reflector, structure, and controls. Establish flows and pressure drops in primary and secondary cooling streams.

2.

1+.

5. 6.

7.

8. Issue a preliminary design report on this rotating fuel power plant. JOB MILESTONES ( R E F E R E N C E M I L E S T O N E EXAMPLES ON P A G E 2 O F D E P A R T M E N T INSTRUCTION X-2)

NO. MILESTONE MO. DAY YR,

1..-

2 . 3.

Issue design specifications for several selected nuclear power systems incorporating a rotating fuel reactor. Issue report describing screening study of these various power plants. Issue a detailed specification report on power plant selected from screening, Issue preliminary design report on this rotating fuel reactor power plant.

11 1 6

61

61 62 62


ANP «2a (3-61) UNCLASSIFIED

http://Rnt.at.Tng

p-]\^/FT-//^;^/ ^/\QJ6\

CONTROL ORO. T.L. TASK



MAJOR COMPONENT

MINOR COMPONENT:

JOB PLANNING SHiET


.SCIENTIFIC FIELD:

.SUB-CONTROL ORONZ:

.PROGRAM ELEMENT: WORD DESCRIPTION OF JOB; Deal gn St.urly n f R o t a t i n g y i i a l R e a l t o r s

'W^ Z^dQC ^V^

5


WORK CLASS:


JOB NO, T ASK NO. P E ^ FN MAJ. MIN. SUBM.

1 S.FLD SUB-C C * c PRO& EU S.A. DET. COMP.

ORIGINAL JOB PUNNINQ SHEET RESOURCES

LABOR

0 1

0 2

OS

0 4

11

12

13

'* IS

21

22

N O


Advanced Desipner

N i i n l p a - r - t h e - r m n -

Mpr'Vlfl.n-i n n l "np«-i p - r

T O T A L ES & E (TE)


nrtTiTpntnt-f n n


DRAFTINO

D A Q H ^f^y

T O T A L DRAFTING



EXPENDITURES



704 COMPUTER

NON-FUND

i < X X X

UNIT PERF. NUMBER

4 4 4

J 3 ,T

<? ^ /?

/ 1 ^

,?,


J A S . 1SSI

1 .

1»

1 •

.

^ •

O N D . 1S6I

1 .

! • 1 •

.

^.

J F M - 1S62

1 .

1 •

1 .

.

. ^»

A M J - 1 9 B 2

1 •

1 •

1 .

.

. 3 •


J A S - 1 8 6 2 O N D - 1962 J F M - 1963 A M J . 1B6S

FISCAL YEAR - 1964

J A S . 1963 O N D - 196S J F M . 1964 A M J . 1964

X 4 3 r9 1^ • P

• ?

. 3

.

. • *>

• P

• P

• P

.

.

. • . P

• • • • • •

• • • • • •

• • • • • •

• •

• . •

• • • • • •

X 4 .^ 7 c ] •

. T

1 • .

1 .

1 • .

1 •

1* • . .

1 . .

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

. B

ODF II


COMMITMENT BALANCE


1»

!•

2 .

.

.

. ? .

? •

2 .

I t .

• • • •

h.

• • • • • •



T E EXPRESS MANPOWER TO THE NEAREST T E N TH h A N 3.7) E> [PRE

. . .

SS DOLLARS 1

.

.

.

N THOUSANDS

.

.

.

, TO THE NEA

• • •

REST TENTH,

• • •

E.O. $27,300

• • •

3R 27.3

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• •

""/ /^ iiMAuooincn 2^^j<^ ^7

JUSTIFICATION

J o b . No.

Is it underway? Yes, since January 1, I961,

Status: A conceptual design report on one version has been written. A completion report is to be completed by June 1, 1961.

General application:

Any nuclear power system that re(3uires high power but a compact reactor and shield.

Why should it be done here?

This reactor uses the folded flow technology which is well developed at Evendale but unknown elsewhere.

CLASSIFIED

AENF RER-1 i ; / l8 /6 i

5

SUBMITTED BY; R. E . Raid

TASK L E A D E R

j L n » n SECURITY CLASSIF ICATION

Job Description Slieet REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED:

CONTROL ORQ.

CAKlTROL SUB-iee. Mdft.

X2£^<r -^cP

D D T . L . TASK

REVIEWED BY:

SUB-CONTROL UNIT SUPVR. APPROX. START AND FINISH O F JOB: S T A R T , -ywr ''"^""= -M57

THIS L INE TO BE USED BY F INANCE ONLY FOR CODINO

S.A. DET . COMP.

JOB TITLE Nuclear Parametric Studies of Fast RRartnrs


To generate nuclear parametric data on fast reactors for rockets, ramjets and other high performance mobile or transportable powerplants. Results in analytical form which will allow sizing of fast reactors for a wide range of application.


Calculations would be made using GE-ANPD program S-VTI, perturbation theory and GE-ANPD fast reactor cross sections. The study would include reactors composed of the following fuel materials* with various reflector combinations.

1. UOo - YoOo 2. UO2 - Mo • 3. UOo - w k. UO2.3 - ThOg

5. PuOg - ThOg 6. PuOg - UO2 ThOg

Range of Variables:

Dia 10 to 50 in Length 10 to 50 in Void Fraction 0 to max.

* The xiranium fuels listed would be both U^35 and U^33.


NO.

1

MILESTONE

Final Report on Fast Reactor Design

MO.

12

DAY

31

YR.

61


ANP «2S (9.S1) ^CLASSIFIED

CONTROL ORO.

it/i8/6l

FURFOSE OF E F F O R T :


MAJOR COMPONENT:

MINOR COMPONENT:


JOB PLANNING SHf n

. SUB.MINOR COMPONENT: .

.SCIENTIFIC FIELD:

. S U B - C O N T R O L ORONZ: . : _


AENF RER -1 ^ ' f ^^ f Isl'


CONTRACT! WORK CLASSe


JOB NO. 1 r ASK NO. F F F N MAJ. MIN. SUBM. S.FLD SUB-C c WC PKOftEL S.A. DET.- COMF.


LABOR

0 1

0 2

0 3

0 4

11

IS

13

: i 1*

IS

21

22

N O

EXEMPT SCI. ft ENO. PER*. tT.E.1

P Ni l P 1 p a r

T O T A L ES « E (TE)

TECHNICAL ASSIST ANTS <EA.)

E . A .

T O T A L T E C H , ASST.

DRAFTINO

T O T A L DRAFTINO

MANUFACTURINO- PROD.

T O T A L MFO, . PROD.

EXPENDITURES

DIR. MAT'L k SERVICES

SUB-CONTRACTS S C.A.

i ^ o M P U T E R H r s / Q u a r t e r

NON>FUND

ODF 11


COMMITMENT BALANCE

DlR. MAT'L ft SERVICES




I p

< UNIT PERF.

NUMBER

4 3 s ^

FISCAL Y E A R - / j ^ ^ I 9 6 I | FISCAL YEAR- \ ^ ^ 1962

J A S - 196

• • • • •

O N D - i s e i J F M . 1962 AMJ.v i / / i q 6 l

l . U

J A S . t > > /

? . n

O N O - , < ^ >

p.n

J F M - 1 > > /

106? A M J . ^ » y

FISCAL YEAR- \k|^ I963

J A S . 196S O N D * 196S J F M . 1964

• • • • •

A M J - 1964

1 1 4 ,3 <9 ,3 •

• • • • •

OBTI 1 BO

• /

• • •

• • •

•

• •

.

. • •

. 1 .

1«0

• • •

• • •

•

• • • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • • 1

^

U.0

• •

1 0

• • •

106

• • • • • •

;

T E N TH 1. I A N 3.7) E> CPRE

• • •

SS DOLLARS

• • •

N THOUSANDS

• • •

. TO THE NEA

• • •

REST TENTH:

• • •

E.O. $27,300

• • •

OR Z7.3

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

Vi8/6i iuiAl KODlCICn '^^^ <^o

JUSTIFICATION

Job No.

I s i t underway? Yes

S t a t u s :

Nuclear Parametric data has been generated for fast reactors fueled with U^35o2 _ jto u235o2 - W, u235o2^2 " ^ 2 ^ ° ^ ^ ° 2 " "^^P*

General applicability:

Fast reactors have the advantage of small size, high core temperatures and h i ^ void volume fractions. The result is higjh power per unit voliime. This is very advantageous for mobile power plants. The proposed study would yield parametric information from which the most advantageous fast reactor could be selected for a specific mobile power plant application.

Why should it be done here:

GE-ANPD has developed unique methods to generate parametric information using variational optimum transport theory and perturbation theory whicii minimize the cost and time involved. GE-ANPD has also developed fast reactor cross sections which when used with these methods have correlated very closely with available fast reactor critical experiment data.

NCIASSIFIED

iNCLASSIFiPn y^s^ c „ ' - /

MA^^^-^^/^-/ ^-yo-C, SECURITY CLASSIF ICATION

SECRlfiT RESTRICTED PATA B - l e v e l

Job Description Sheet u 3 8 3

SUBMITTED BY:

P. W. Harper TASK LEADER

V8/61 SATE


CONTROL ORQ.

CONTROL SUB-$EC. MOR.

REVIEWEb BY:

SUt t -ddNTROL UNIT SUPVR. APPROX. START AND FINISH O F JOB: S T A R T , 61

-TRT '''^""' -M57

1 ^ T . L . 1

1 rASK

DATE

6 62


PR06.EL S.A. DET . COMP.

JOB T I T L E . Experimental air design of folded flow fuel bed cartridge (It x scale)

JOB O B J E C T I V E (RELATIONSHIP TO PRODUCT (HARDWARE) OR NON-PRODUCT (NON-HARDWARE) D E V E L O P M E N T ; F INAL RESULT E X P E C T E D O P THIS JOB

To provide a i r -des ign r e l a t i onsh ips and performance predic t ion co r re l a t ions with theory.


Uetenr.ine t o t a l pressure losses and flow d i s t r i b u t i o n for: (a) Several plenum geometry gross v a r i a t i o n s . (b) Secondary flow s p l i t percentage v a r i a t i o n s . (c) Entrance flow p ro f i l e v a r i a t i o n .

Provide co r r e l a t i ons with theory, or performance predic t ion for P122C3 design with per tu rba t ions e f f e c t s . Flow measurements based upon to ta l -head- tubes in addi t ion to w a l l - s t a t i c - t u b e s .

JOB MILESTONES ( R E F E R E N C E M I L E S T O N E EXAMPLES ON P A O E 2 O F D E P A R T M E N T INSTRUCTION X-2)

NO.

1

2

3

U

MILESTONE

•Complete f ab r i ca t i on and assembly of i n i t i a l conf igurat ion.

Report on r e s u l t s of i n i t i a l conf igura t ion .

Report on r e s u l t s of a l t e r n a t e conf igura t ion .

Modifications and miscellaneous e f f e c t s . jumraary Report

MO.

10

12

2

6

DAY

1

1

1

1

YR.

61

61

62

62


ANP 828 (3.81) SECRET RESTRICTED DATA

NMFIED

• ' .''/ - ^ / / ^ - / ' / / ^

CONTROL OKO. a • T.L. TASK

PURFOSE OF E F F O R T . A r l \ m n r - P ft PT^P^^m^ n a r y n p K ^ g n

FROOUCT NnMENCLATuRE: Folded Flotf Powgr Plant MAJOR COMPONENT: Over-all ReBCtor MINOR COMPONENT:

JOB PLANNING SHEET

. SUB-MINOR COMPONENT;




WORD DESCRIPT ION OF JOB; AprntViPTTTiHl p p r f n r m a n r - p t . p . g t s n f r p a o t n r p a r t . r i d g p .

i o ^ ^ '2.

5



THIS LINE TO SE USED BY FINANCE ONLY FOR CODINO

JOB NO. r ASK NO. F E

1 _ PN_ _ MAJ. MIN. SUBM. S.FLD SUB-C C - c PRCXiEL S.A. DET. COMP.


LABOR

0 1

0 2

OS

04

t 1

12

IS

U

19

21

22

N O

EXEMPT SCI. k ENO. PER*. (T.E.)

F l u i d M e c h a n i c s

A d v . K n f f - i n e e r i n g A n a l v s i s


TECHNICAL ASSI ST ANTS ( E A.)

F1 \\-. ri Merha.ni r.s

T O T A L T E C H . ASST,

DRAFTINO

Tp?;t, F:(iLin'pmpn+. D ^ P I T ^

T O T A L DRAFTING


f i e r i R r a l Shops

T O T A L MFO. - PROD,

EXPENDITURES

DIR. MAT'L » SERVICES


704 COMPUTER

NON-FUND

ODF 11


COMMITMENT BALANCE


i

X

UNIT PERF. NUMBER

h h

, •^

? It

8 ^ ^

FISCAL Y E A R - ) ^ I 9 6 I

J A S . I9S< O N D - 1961 J F M - 1962 A M J - / / / /

1 9 6 1

1 . ^

n . 3 .

FISCAL YEAR - f ^ I 9 6 2

1Q61

1 . 0

n«3 •

. .

. . 1 . 6 1 . ^

O N D - / / / /

1 0 6 :

1 B O

OB 3

.

.

. 1 « ^

J F M - / / ^

1062

1 . 0

n . 3 . . .

! • ^

A M J . / / / /

1962

I B O

o»3 B

B

1 B^

FISCAL YEAR - 1964 ,

J A S - 1963

,

O N D - 196S

.-

J F M . 1964 A M J - 1964

X it • ^

If 1 1 _. • .

_ • _ . f

.

1 0

• • • •

1*0

1 » 0

• • • •

1 « 0

1 « 0

• • • •

! • 0

1 B O

B

B

B

, 1 * 0

• •

•

•

^ k ^ 7 7 • • •

• • •

• • •

0 . 5 0 » 1|

. . 0 . 5 0 . It

0 * 2

• 0 . 2

OB 1

B

O B 1

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• • •

• ) ( ^ s -\ 0 1 . i .

• • • •

2 . 0 3» 0 . . . . • . .

? BO

• ^ • 0

1 » 0

• • • •

1 « 0

O B 5

OB 6

• • •

• • •

* i * * It * • II •

2 B O

2 . 0

• 1 » ^

• 0.5 •

1B8

• 0^ 5

• 0 . 5

• 1 . 0

B

O B 2

B

OB 5 •

0 . 7

• • •

O B 5

• 0 . 5 .

. SUB-CONTRACTS ft C.A. •

T O T A L COMMIT B A L A N C E «

r E- EXPRESS MANPOWER TO THE NEAREST T E N TH h AN 3.7} E> P R E SS DOLLARS

• • •

N THOUSANDS

• • •

, TO THE NEA

• • •

REST TENTH;

• • •

E.G. $27.S00

• • •

3R 27.S

• • •

• • • • • •

• • •

• • •

• •

http://Merha.ni

l i / l8/6i

i*-i. S?r

/^SL^^ ^

JUSTIFICATION

AENF PWH-1

(1) Is it underway . . .

Barely

(2) Status . . .

Preliminary design planning.


Any reverse folded flow fuel bed cartridge.

(4) Why should it he done here . . .

Analytical performance prediction for this region is poor - can

expect flow deficiencies of easily up to at least 10^ on gross

radial. No previous test results for secondary coolant flow return

system. Uncertain test results exist for single entrance system

(entrance to moderator plenum). ANPD has the necessary facilities,

equipment, and personnel with analytical and experimental experience

in folded flow systems design to accomplish this work.

liUSSIFIED

UJ'>/-»

;_„_J!!F

o'or {7:?^

o-//

/»Vji-

î!2

r:?-^

.?-^

^T

^^''

1

v.feA'^

L'W

£.'S

S-6

OT

b

D',Vy

sz s-6

OT

,''47-'^.

vg; vf^k Aj ^*^

J.'V>

p> J-9

PT

7 A

'

iT'^

.«-z

cy

^ ^(S

oy ^'j'

OP

/^,5'

'5S

__-.h ^^W

Z?fe?

(7-z

ov/

try

'jKii

na

o-r /V

OS

ov/

^'

V-fOJ

IVl

O^ Zf>

s-t

" er

^T!/-

Tnt

O'/ AO

5-if/

V7<f-^_... v^

9W

^y'/' ,pw

n

r-C^

^

D-^

Qyi/

OT

or/

077

0'9/

o-pz

,76/

s•'^^

•??r

O'/

Pt

oz OT

OZ

oy

ox

0»

?^

4jyi

'yn

2"*-

oy

O-T

<?/

or

o^

oy

Oz

oy

?y

/^' v>:yfs

^'

,?JV

^v

cx

£ir

OT

oz

OS

?f

*«^/^

y< >-

^;*^

oy

O-T

D-2

ot

0-4

S'-'^

^?

'^2

IS

O'S

ev

oo

P V

/:^

t^ !^

ej?

o-^ i?-?/

/^ o> 0// 0'> o?»' «?';?•

£>:?

£?^

ra:

/•«*/

sT/y

/«j«il

J/

^7«

rvif

~ / 0-/

o/ o>

OS OT 0-Z

0-ff py

ov S-!

ov

Oi>

e/r 'fit'

•(<A Y^y/

P'Ji

OY

0-/ 0-^

p-/ OT

or ov O-y

c'y St

OV

p'*

vtr

i/jy

J^^

^P

S OZ

oy 0-? oy

OT

O'i .cy

oy

o-e

s-ffr

ffiiS

t.^ Q

/f3__ oi/i.y.

vu

oy oy

0-i Oy

o-Z

o-z sy oy

ov

S'X

?'..-?

'^X y<A'v,

777

fX

o-r /i-o

O'C

o-o o-c

ov

/iC

I ^-â"

> Sis'. rt'S' V/-s'&' -yiii/7>/ \ J(-9^-y4^s'y

<2 • T^ -y/irs'y /'»c>th^ yA(7iz

? yyy^y 'A-\'^:^ ^ >5=V y jyi/iy

1 A-A'ylfY-y-*^^ i i y,,zs'-*t -j'.'yîy

1 1 ^-s:/• yyz?!/

\ \ 1 /-5:L^-î*^ ; t^/'jP'ff'vrf*'.^^'

-

1 /^9'yAy7t>' -f^-s^tK yyj'i^

€Lfi

s /PJS^

^ i Jî'S^- vab^/s>.^j«f^5

OO, ?p. e^Myjp/»v9^ yeyi)UAi^/A/jQr

^ /*<^^ t z-^ty yy "s^- Âf'<7 '^s(z/ît^"'fy^^^

9^fA-

) yÂ

oy,^ - sb/^'fyfip ^!î><y

'

'^'yy/ir-f(z "ôt?' •S'^y n/oy

•X>y^ <2'î>(y'AKy^/OJy^^_y

pbr> - OfUJîêyy/ôvP^/oy x#/i> -s-:>i'!rf<^ ycy:>p^y

oozfi'- 'y^,'/^ 'Z^.^y offrA - 2S7f^/o<ymr)

£y7/i^- ^,)Y/"-y'^y'^ye,'^/x«^;)/t»v^^ S--5Ây.jW^lA O^tfi- ^'rpy:v^rrj"vis>fy/(^'yy-rj^^

s srytfy^/f - Piifiy-^ 9'?iy

s^pjf^y j-'VAy y^7y '•S'yif^y 'tf-S'/iAy-2)(«7y

T-^yify

Ay9'yu.'r-)hyyyy-'?V: >j^

r-p'4i

.'yy^

• 1

y-'r^

rv-' sre^

s^ynyV-aifty-Jw^ y-y4y.,y • y-AÂ,

r'A'y 2-t^ •' •'s^^y

'/V* •'^^yfy

^tj/jr^Sf^ irWJ^ '/-iity-J^yyr^'

12

55^

•^9/ j

i

'^/yy 1 i

OGT/'-

d,s^^ j^/C>y'f''"y^/Z •s^<^y'*.P(z

TytA - (''^yzy^/zs

oipyt - 'yoyyiry^ yî^FZ^y^y

^^£/--•socyyv^ -"iy^^''r9yy>y}^y

^1 _

iP?^ - '."ytv^ ^''^'ô^y y/Y

iyay,/lP3-/

•ê>j \^t^û^^^n^b^^^:}/wê/^^ jû A'/E^LVUW^

7i

i!t

'??.

OS o'/

xl?^

0-g a-p O't or

07

OV

^•J S''

?i

OS

OS

X py 03

py or

ot yt o-t

oz

IVO'/

otoy

o'>

TO

om

O't o'/o>

O'i OS

y* ro rt!

tv .r/fy

oiri

SVi-o

OS

n

oy

n

o'l o-z i'/

O'y pv t'

,« S'y y Fv

OS OS

r«f»

/•yry-y/iy/y

SfvpîfOfy^, 'oy?-î< o^y/o

o/^pt^t^fiVT 'f^<z/t"^-<izz^ -^^^/^^yy ?-^y-y^?y iyy79 'fof/f^/y-'."'^/vyo,<y

•i^typfot/S^t(^/^»wrv^May z'-szjy/iyyy

'^'•f^y-^J 2/7d(y /.'^:}/'/pyX>/^ t p/p'uf^<^ji//pvir«yy '7^»^^ / zz y//7y

'^0'jyf/y-'îyc-/yiy -"^/" i/-DTy^P</<,/oyfi/L//rr>/e/s..gy /.^y y/yyy *â«^ If fA/oy /tt< 76f//-fr '-y '^/P!M-(i?'V7 '^(^ c^^y^-.'/y p--ZZy//7y

i/v//^ •'oy/p2-yj-/yY(Z^y^^ T-ys-y/zyy

y.X2^^ ^-=2^ "^ ^^^

/•yÔ 'y -(o/oPsy Mo/y/J>y>/Oj,\ /. y^ y//fy

•<p^/3^// vyts// /ojz »^^zy\2-3'/yiy zy/-i/

, yr'^/^vy^'p-yyiAyj°j-js^yy f-z/My-yAyji/

I I y ' ^ 'P o tjp'z\y'\/Jjfooy-ffy/ov,ff yoj ic'j^^ if6>9xy T-zy^y yzriy

^^•>(i>y^jôoy yj/:syP:fZ / f^y <7'i|c>'4**1*'?l'//«"*'5' /" ^y"vp ''fyî'Q^ z-ff/>iy -y/i/yy

, i/u/ytyi>zji-j!>(^ U*ty >J >»^ ;7? iL4 -Ifl >"*• ^7 ^;777 ^y ?7 ^f' fW- »

<w yy ^//y/WfOS' i> 0(/Mi.>iyybiy^ 00^ TTfl-JYfT 00/? rfis/r tesfy s/^ypv^ ifPf^

I \ I _L i.

^V^jwg^ /i^svi'Jt/yy

1? '\JJ,7 7

o/ofoy^ypcrvE-otx.

?7.

Oyff"/ OV0'>

fC

0'/

7

o> e-/

7cZ .V-

o/ oy f/ 0/

3;7 '7 J f »

I (•i/^s^x^Ji>^-'Z-<f^

/7 i/w!^/> 'f/v Zf/iy^'y^y-îo^? ! !ô/ppjy

W' •TS'yAzy^Y •'^"'hyz'^'"^'^

iyoy/r//y:>^^(/

€•:> C^^

C-3

f-H/ity y/ZZty

yz9'My/yz>y

Z syyyiyzy

^tt fJ^ •Y

^ ..iî w «• 5. W vV» f ^ ' ^ X B» i / r/ V

t«r IS

f^

i/"*-o/y?op

Z9?r /PPfi-VPS'y '^^•f'?fiîfp^ o//y^/^y^S' O^/y^^ry/ei/y

9^ J ?., ''ay /Bsr.Ti^wX'.'-^TiwAiiy wifAtCHf'yp^y' ir.7^, r^yvv

w^-55T5?

f^

OO

0/ Vt O'/Vt

^•?^7

DttnOiPi o-i

•^J <^'?7'^

71 r/

?7t

010-i O-iVi Of Q't Of DJ

09 oy c-c

^'P

0'>0>

crz cTi 01 yt

oy 9-1 O'I 01

ot 0'' 0'/

0> Ot Oir/,

f/tp-i oy

rczx.to

'J'l^ y y/'P J-

y/ovt-o

O'i Pi

<}yoy 0/0-*

oto-j

ys Oi Of OS

yz7i

"SOS

^'iPl^'^y'^

izza

er>

i '

Y»Z/^->Tj: Mc// /sa/>/o/ /O iy&sy> -//ip /p/iy3uy/4p</xj

Tyo/^ppy /i'py/0

Hiy^ZS' \->y-(ZSnyP'<py îpj/av^^ I v-ro}opsy

vi<tp/sjio-'7- *(?/;. 'ifir- o^/"

I I \s:yO/DPjy Z^^ I ^"yfyoy/o A/yvy^ iriyi

l^V7S y'y/'y^ yi^ry/ii^ô^y .t4rj-yp'/o iybf?s(/7^fuf>ii(yj^y

UCyDPiyiUyZ^Y^ypofyy. cyo^ô/

'py-y.^y/y) 'yiys'^(z /•f^y'^y^^/y

•^Y/ /'^(/•'^'y(7yA/i7-79 /o

'yoi^f^Vu//^°y -yo) T&yYP^p

Xc/P'yif^''z yo/yX'y^ .y/y Y-yty^fipy 'f<y27"y^\y "i"

(yw//fifyz'/\ty(Zfyi'''cy y/foi. 'y Z-y.yo <yy iy/yo/ yy•'y^'.'^ °^f •'"2''^^

y^j'/^yyy/o yefyp^Yiy^Py zVyo <• •' -f<yyf'sy^kyy/>Xo/oy

\o^yp I siyyP^ zyjyôy f ^'y"i(y vA-^/ZjQ^ jr-i'^fyz s-ffynyyA'^y

yôyif ^yy^_zzs\yooy •f\>^/3v,P' T?.y<'^/y/\ j-sipyy ^ffynyyyysy

iô//Oryyj?,-i(y

/-my-y/yyv

/•v?yyy7y

z-iyy-yyvzy

f^<y\ yyvyU-yAyry

z-Zzy/yiv

/-sy-y/yyy

/•f/y-y/i^jy

fi'-7ZZA'7^'

s 77-y/iyjy

y/-^7 y^yi^ /•77-y/iy7y

y * »V

IV3^

V » ,1 t>^,ô^^, 'Z?.* > A r«i 9vy°r

\w? WiT av? 7ZFi^ p v^''^'^^^ 0 "^^^^y^^^y /y^f^y^jz <CP«?^

OB ?A

^P«^!?P37 —TTJiCTTSTTV k ^y^'SMix.

iVTfi'

rtz^7

Of'^ -v?>

^r. •^rsnri •Szy-"pSSTV^y

%

'-5 •

^

riblnyylhE

1 ^

o

-^

T

-i 1:

J j ^

-^ ^

l^^

-l^ ^

1-

1 _J hi

K

^ > -sr

I

^0

_s

j_

-<s-

4 I i ^ ^ ^

S 1-

•T

y

-^ ^5^

•5.

<5

V ^ 111 U

,-^ \

:i s 1^

"I 1'

t t—

-r~

«

M

\^

^ ?

Cr

^

1 m

MiiS

KR

J tt-^^

^ <s

1" <r

i U

i?

S c

•>

>

0! 3

, 3

n :

? viS

v<L

Itntt

No

i I

T

S •V

S

;t '^

•T

1 I

>^

^ ^ ^ i

3L.

•V

^ ^ i I 1

i I UNCWSSIFIED

digital.library.unt.edu/67531/metadc928104/m2/1/high_re… · disclaimer this report was prepared...

Documents