FMP EvaluationCameron Duncan

Production Process Evaluation

Research• My research is a bit messy but it is good at some points, My strengths are

explaining what the pictures are and how the lighting is aimed and how the shadows are placed on the artist.

• This helped my product by letting me show who I was doing it on and how I would be doing it and the layouts for it.

• My weaknesses were that I didn’t do enough detail of the covers so I just had to add my own type of style on the research part.

• I could think of how I could put more information in and I could use something to do that can improve how I can put things in more detail.

• It wouldn’t have any effect on my product because I already had an idea of what I was going to do and how I could proceed in doing so.

Planning• My planning was ok but I know I could’ve done better, my strengths were

that I used my mind to set 2 different layouts for potential ideas for my front cover, I didn’t do the double page spread seeing as I done a plan of that on paper which I still need to upload to my production reflection.

• This helped my production by letting me test out what kind of layouts I could have and where I wanted everything, I also decided on what my slogan was at this point.

• My weaknesses were that I don’t think I put enough detail in what I was doing when I was telling the reader on why I picked those layouts and colours to use on my magazine.

• I could have put more details in my pre-production.• This would have no effect on my product either because like I said before I

thought about what I was going to do before hand.

Time Management• My time management was better than last time and I got everything in

before or on the deadline, my strengths were that I was up to date with everything and after a while I was ahead of everyone else in my course and I could slow down with my work.

• I would have everything done, plus the last project handed in on time.

Technical QualitiesThey have put the mast heading at the

side of Sabrina where as I have put it

above her.

Both magazines have her in the middle

of the page but the original one has

her a bit to the right.

Both slogans are at the bottom of the magazine. The one on the original is slanted slightly.

There is more information on the original one

than on mine.

My magazine has a barcode and a price tag on the cover, on the original it maybe on the back.

Aesthetic QualitiesMy work does look good, I have been told by multiple people and I like how on the double page spread that the headings are the same color as

the opposite page.

On the cover I like how most of the writing is red or pink and the mast heading is white, It makes it stand out and flow more.

I have already improved it and this is the final product so I wouldn’t improve it anymore. My strengths are that I have done a lot of writing in the content part of the magazine. My weaknesses are that at the start when I was creating the double page spread I put to much writing on the content part that it was all squished so I had to remove some o the writing.

Audience Appeal

I have appealed to my target audience by putting in what my favorite songs by Sabrina and how they made me feel when I listen to them, I also added an “interview” I had with Sabrina asking her “what did you think when you were becoming more famous?” I also put what she is from and who she plays on those TV shows. On the cover I put the writing bold so it would stand out to the target audience and they would want to buy and read it.

Peer Feedback

Feedback 1• What did you like about the product?

– I like the different variation of colours around the magazine, the fonts also fit the magazine style well. The front cover is well presented and the pictures are framed well around the text.

• What improvements could have been made to the product?

• The text at the bottom of the page could stand out more as I can’t really see this, but it is a good choice in colour.

Feedback 2

• What did you like about the product?I like the whole magazine. It’s very interesting to know about Sabrina and that you took my amazing idea.• What improvements could have been made to

the product?Some improvements could be the spelling and grammar.

Feedback 3

• What did you like about the product?– I like the fact that it looks professional and it

includes multiple interesting information. <3• What improvements could have been made to

the product?– One of the words on the cover page is cut in half

due to there not being enough space. – One of the pictures on the double spread page is

pixelated.

Peer Feedback Summary

• What do you agree with from your peer feedback?– I agree that there are a few miss spelt words in the

content part of the magazine.– I can see which word is halved on the cover.

• What do you disagree with from your peer feedback?– There is nothing that I disagree with.

Peer Feedback Summary• I would go back and change everything that is wrong with it and what they said

upon the peer feedback and I saw some stuff I could improve on my own as well, because it looks bad when you get miss spelt words and words cut in half because it gives you a bad reviews in other magazines.