9 th doha interfaith dialogue 2011 social media mirroring social change challenges and chances for...

8
9 th DOHA INTERFAITH DIALOGUE 2011 Social Media Mirroring Social Change Challenges and Chances for Interfaith Dialogue Thomas A. Bauer, Department of Communication University of Vienna, Austria European Society for Education and Communication (ESEC) [email protected]

Upload: olivia-simmons

Post on 28-Mar-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 9 th DOHA INTERFAITH DIALOGUE 2011 Social Media Mirroring Social Change Challenges and Chances for Interfaith Dialogue Thomas A. Bauer, Department of Communication

9th DOHA INTERFAITH DIALOGUE 2011

Social Media Mirroring Social Change

Challenges and Chances for Interfaith Dialogue

Thomas A. Bauer, Department of Communication

University of Vienna, Austria

European Society for Education and Communication (ESEC)

[email protected]

Page 2: 9 th DOHA INTERFAITH DIALOGUE 2011 Social Media Mirroring Social Change Challenges and Chances for Interfaith Dialogue Thomas A. Bauer, Department of Communication

Main Theses: Going Into Depth by Means of Theoretical Concepts

Challenge of Rethinking the Methods and Concepts of Notion and Knowledge

Cultural Turn in Understanding Communication: open the mind for new paradigms

Cultural Turn in Understanding Media: focus on mediality as the code of social construction of meaning

Constructivist Understanding of Social Change: change happens though an observation uploaded with interest of change

Communicational Understanding of Religion: the communicational environment for the narration of God

Page 3: 9 th DOHA INTERFAITH DIALOGUE 2011 Social Media Mirroring Social Change Challenges and Chances for Interfaith Dialogue Thomas A. Bauer, Department of Communication

Communication Culture I

From Structural (what) to Cultural (why) Observation :

Instead of analysing the structural systems (too much taking about “the media”) recent communication/media studies interpret communication/media as cultural construction of meaning (values, sense)

All social order is an agreement of and through communication (even mediatized): all immaterial reality does not have its meaning by itself, but by communication of experience, perception and observation

Communication – a Cultural Concept for Acting & for Observing the Sociability of Human Existence

Action related to the antagonism of power / subordination and to distribution of influence (vertical, hierarch. tendency / discourse model)Observation related to control certainty: you – me relation and identity

and identification (horizontal, heterarchical tendency / dialogue-model)

Page 4: 9 th DOHA INTERFAITH DIALOGUE 2011 Social Media Mirroring Social Change Challenges and Chances for Interfaith Dialogue Thomas A. Bauer, Department of Communication

Communication Culture II

Communication – not the tool or the instrument (power & influence) but the social environmental (setting, frame) of mutual perception and attention (common frame for you and me)

Communication – discourse: the cultural model of social order through consensus ( focus: unification, assimilation of sight) & dialogue: the cultural model for distinction and differentiation (focus: the other, surprise)

Communication in context of religion: the cultural model for communification of (unified frame for) difference in and diversity of construction of sense and distribution of sociability of sense (meaning)

Page 5: 9 th DOHA INTERFAITH DIALOGUE 2011 Social Media Mirroring Social Change Challenges and Chances for Interfaith Dialogue Thomas A. Bauer, Department of Communication

Rethinking Media

Media as tools and instruments – industrial perspective, concept of technical plausibility – affirmative perspective

Socialized use of media (assimilated, restrictive, repressive) vs. social use of media (authentic, situational, emancipative) usage of media as a social practice of being aware of each other: media becomes media through using the media (usage is the topos of communication)

Media Competence: from media organized to medialized exchange of experience un order to construct open meaning

Page 6: 9 th DOHA INTERFAITH DIALOGUE 2011 Social Media Mirroring Social Change Challenges and Chances for Interfaith Dialogue Thomas A. Bauer, Department of Communication

Social Change : Mind Habit Relation

Social Media represent on a technological and sociological level the principle of changeability of observation and self-observation (self-realization) of mankind: Change of mind, of habit and of relationship

Social Change (observing our observation) is the matter of dialogical (dialectic) communication in the interest (need) of constructing reality

Social Change as Media Change: from mass media-communication to mediatized mass communication: new social order (new paradigm of trust) for a next-to-next-society: individual sovereignty, option of casual connectivity, ubiquitious presence, instant relevance, heterarchy, heresy (choice) etc.

Page 7: 9 th DOHA INTERFAITH DIALOGUE 2011 Social Media Mirroring Social Change Challenges and Chances for Interfaith Dialogue Thomas A. Bauer, Department of Communication

What to be Aware of?

The communicative structure of religion in context of social media (cultural change) structurally will change in all societies interfered by social mediallty (medialized sociability: society constituting itself in model of media-mass- communication / religion in a new communicational environment will change its ontology and its social (political) meaning

From causal to casual model of communication: the role-model of symbolic interaction turns successively into a more casually interchanged individually mimetic model of (explorative) construction of sense

Because of loss of trust in institutions in general (at least in western or westernized societies), religion as the primary&radical reference of the communicative practice of society in need of interpretation of reality – successively replacing the institutional performance of religion thus challenging the institutional performance of religion: growing gap of competence and credibility?

Anthropological Model: Communication as destination against uncertainty: mutually exchanged re-mind of the experience that is might be the destiny of mankind’s existence to be undefined/ undetermined

Page 8: 9 th DOHA INTERFAITH DIALOGUE 2011 Social Media Mirroring Social Change Challenges and Chances for Interfaith Dialogue Thomas A. Bauer, Department of Communication

Referencies

Bauer, Thomas A. (1980): Streitpunkt Dogma. Wien: Böhlau

GIDDENS, Anthony (1990): The Consequence of Modernity. Stanford

FLUSSER; Vilém (2003): Kommunikologie. Frankfurt: Fischer

KROTZ, Friedrich: (2008): Kultureller und gesellschaftlicher Wandel im Kontext des Wandels von Medien und Kommunikation. In: Thomas, Tanja, Hg. Medienkultur und soziales Handeln. Wiesbaden: 43 - 62

LUHMANN, Niklas (1974): Sinn als Grundbegriff der Soziologie. In: Habermas, Jürgen / Luhmann, Niklas: Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung? Frankfurt/M: 25 –100: suhrkamp

LUHMANN, Niklas (1968): Vertrauen. Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität. Soziologische Gegenwartsfragen, Neue Folge, ed.. by L. Neundorfer, H. Schelksky und F.H. Tenbruck. Stuttgart

MEAD, George Herbert (1973): Geist, Identität und Gesellschaft Frankfurt: suhrkamp

SCHELKLE, Waltraud (2000): Paradigms of social change: modernization, development, transformation, evolution. Frankfurt: Campus

SCHMIDT, Siegfried J. (1994): Kognitive Autonomie und soziale Orientierung. Konstruktivistische Bemerkungen zum Zusammenhang von Kognition, Kommunikation, Medien und Kultur. Frankfurt

TAYLOR, Charles (2002): Die Formen des Religiösen in der Gegenwart. Frankfurt: suhrkamp

WILLIAMS, Raymond (1958): Culture and Society 1780-1950. Cambridge