991209 src workshop
DESCRIPTION
ReadTRANSCRIPT
-
PROMISE OF TUNNEL DIODEINTEGRATED CIRCUITS
Alan SeabaughDepartment of Electrical Engineering
University of Notre DameNotre Dame, IN
Acknowledgements: P. Barrios, B. Bate, P. Berger, T. Blake,B. Brar, T. Broekaert, K. Clark, M. Dashiell, X. Deng, W. Frensley,
G. Frazier, J. Gunther, J. Hellums, K. Hobart, W. Kirk,J. Kolodzey, R. Lake, J. Lyding, E. Maldonado, C. Marrian,
P. Mazumder, T. Moise, F. Morris, G. Pomrenke, S. Rommel,G. Spencer, P. Thompson, T. Troeger, P. van der Wagt, G. Witt.
A. Seabaugh, Promise of Tunnel Diode Integrated Circuits, Tunnel Diode and CMOS/HBTIntegration Workshop, December 9, 1999, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC.
-
THE p+n+ TUNNEL DIODEHigh speed, multivalued I-V, with negative differential resistance
n p
depletion region
EC
EVEF
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
-0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75
Cur
rent
(m
A)
Voltage (V)
1N2927 Si tunnel diode
Si Plot 1
300 K
-
Scanning electron micrographs of a Si 1N2927(no longer sold, Microsemi Corp., CA)
70 m
20 m
The demise of the tunnel diode [in the 1960s] was signaled by the arrival in force of theSwartz, In perspective: the tunnel diode, 1986 IEEE Int. Solid-State
Circuits Conf., pp. 278-280. Until recently, processes for forming tunnel diodes were still basedon the discrete approach shown above.
-
MAIN POINTS
Circuit simulations using tunnel diodes (TD) show benefit
RTD/HEMT technology shows feasibilty
Silicon TDs now demonstrated: Matsushita, Toshiba, U. Delaware,NRL, Raytheon, Hughes, Max-Planck Institute
Time is right to add TD to silicon bipolar and MOS
Relatively low risk
High benefit/cost
-
Figure 1. Circuit schematic diagrams for (a) RTD/HEMTand (b) HEMT comparators designed for 25 GHzoperation.
A. Seabaugh, B. Brar, T. Broekaert, F. Morris, P. van der Wagt, and G. Frazier, Resonant-Tunneling Mixed-Signal Circuit Technology, Solid State Electronics 43 (1999) 1355-1365.
-
CIRCUIT DESIGNS SHOWTD PERFOMANCE BOOST
SPICE models: 18c07 0.25 mm CMOS and resonant tunneling diode modelsfit to both dc and S-parameter measurements
TD in combination with CMOS reduces the number of devices,interconnects, and delay stages
TD improves area, speed, and power by the following factors:Area Speed Active Power Static Power
Embedded RAM: vs. 6T 2.2x (3x) - 8x vs. 1T (1.4x) same - 23xLatches, flip flops, and
shift registers1.6-3x 1.7-2.2x 2.1-2.4x (1.1-1.7x)
Dynamic logic andpass-transistor logic
1.3-1.4x 1.2-2.3x 1.5-1.8x same
Quantizers 3.5x 2.2x 5.8x 2.3x( ) performance reduction
Numbers which are not in parenthesis represent improvements obtained using the tunnel diode,e.g. in line 1, the tunnel diode embedded RAM occupies 2.2x less area than the 6T cell and
dissipates 8x less standby power, while numbers in parenthesis indicate a performance reduction,e.g. again in line 1, 3x slower access speed for the TD circuit vs the 6T SRAM.
A. Seabaugh, X. Deng, T. Blake, B. Brar, T. Broekaert, R. Lake, F. Morris, and G. Frazier,Transistors and Tunnel Diodes For Analog/Mixed-Signal Circuits and Embedded Memory,IEDM Technical Digest 1998, pp. 429-432
-
Tunnel Diode For Embedded Memory
I1I2I3
I2+I3
I3 TD1 I1
I2TD2BL
1V
WL
0V
0V
NODE VOLTAGE (V)
CU
RR
EN
T (
pA
)
0
4
8
12
16
0 0.4 0 .8
(a) (b)Fig. 3: CMOS/TD SRAM cell: (a) schematic diagramand (b) current-voltage relations.
TABLE 1COMPARISON OF CMOS/TD SRAM CELLS WITH CMOS
EMBEDDED DRAM AND 6T SRAM
ProcessCell
Area(mm2)
DensityRatio(x6T)
CycleTime(ns)
StandbyCurrent
(pA)CMOS 6T
SRAM7.00 1.0 4 7
CMOS 1T+1CgDRAM
5.79 1.2 18 31
CMOS+TD
1T+1Cg+2TDSRAM
7.02 1.0 18 3
CMOS+Cap
1T+1CstDRAM
2.26 3.1 12 21
CMOS+Cap+TD
1T+1Cst+2TDSRAM
3.15 2.2 12 0.9
A. Seabaugh, X. Deng, T. Blake, B. Brar, T. Broekaert, R. Lake, F. Morris, and G. Frazier,Transistors and Tunnel Diodes For Analog/Mixed-Signal Circuits and Embedded Memory,
IEDM Technical Digest 1998, pp. 429-432
-
TD-Simplified Keeper Circuit
OUT
CK
INOUT
CK
CK
IN
VD DVD D
CK
(a) (b)
Fig.6: Static shift register comparison: (a) CMOS/TDand (b) CMOS only.
A. Seabaugh, X. Deng, T. Blake, B. Brar, T. Broekaert, R. Lake, F. Morris, and G. Frazier,Transistors and Tunnel Diodes For Analog/Mixed-Signal Circuits and Embedded Memory,IEDM Technical Digest 1998, pp. 429-432.
-
0 200 400 600 800 10000
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
OU
T (
V)
TIME (ps) 3771trtf plot
Figure 19. Resonant tunneling diode clock generator: (a)schematic diagram and (b) 6.5 GHz output signal
waveform.A. Seabaugh, B. Brar, T. Broekaert, F. Morris, P. van der Wagt, and G. Frazier, Resonant-Tunneling Mixed-Signal Circuit Technology, Solid State Electronics 43 (1999) 1355-1365.
-
Figure 6. Scanning electron micrograph of a completedRTD/HEMT quantizer circuit showing the three-dimensional integration of RTDs on HEMT source anddrain contact regions.
A. Seabaugh, B. Brar, T. Broekaert, F. Morris, P. van der Wagt, and G. Frazier, Resonant-Tunneling Mixed-Signal Circuit Technology, Solid State Electronics 43 (1999) 1355-1365.
-
WHAT ARE THE RISKS
No new materials
Similar to adding resistor, capacitor, or diode
Key technical challenges:
Milestones Risk
Low High
Demonstrate production compatible tunnel diode (TD) vDemonstrate TD uniformity v
Demonstrate TD reproducibility v
Demonstrate TD reliability v
BENEFITS FROM SUCCESSFULIMPLEMENTATION OF Si TD
1. Extends life of existing facilities by increasing circuit performance without scaling
2. Provides a technology differentiator, like low k, or Cu interconnect
-
QMOS ROADMAP
Integration of the quantum device (tunnel diode) with CMOS iscalled QMOS.
1
10
100
1000
1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011
Cos
t (uc
/dev
ice)
Del
ay x
Pow
er (f
J/de
vice
)
Silicide,Localinterconnect
CuLow k
SOI?
QMOS?
702009
Feature SizeProduction Year
1502001
1002006
2501997
1801999
1302003
502012
1000
10
10
1
No known solutions - SIA 97
Datapoints: SIA National Roadmap, 1997 Ed.
1 logic function = 4 devices in CMOSLines: qualitative
-
CONCLUSIONSCircuit simulations using tunnel diodes (TD) show benefit
RTD/HEMT technology shows feasibilty
Silicon TDs now demonstrated: Matsushita, Toshiba, U. Delaware,NRL, Raytheon, Hughes, Max-Planck Institute
Time is right to add TD to silicon bipolar and MOS
Relatively low risk
High benefit/cost