a federal emergency management agency september 19 - 22, 2006 west virginia urban-rural evacuation...

37
a Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Upload: felix-page

Post on 11-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

a

Federal Emergency Management Agency

September 19 - 22, 2006

West Virginia Urban-Rural EvacuationState Planners Workshop

Page 2: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Conference Goals

• Identify the breadth and scope of the problem• Clarify the regional issues associated with the

problem.• Discuss regional strategies and possible

solutions to address the problem.• Identify low hanging fruit opportunities to get

work done- Collaborate on a integrated regional evacuation plan

        - MOU’s between states

Page 3: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

a

Page 4: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Potential for an Uncontrolled Mass Evacuation of the DC Metro Area as a Result

of a Terrorist Attack:A Report of Survey Findings

West Virginia University Project Team:Brian J. Gerber, PhDJoseph R. Scotti, PhDAlan Ducatman, MD

Ronald Althouse, PhDMark Fischer, MPA

Page 5: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Project Focus

• Implication of a catastrophic terrorist attack in Washington, DC: Mass evacuation

• Public’s potential response

Page 6: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Key Research Questions

– Will Washington, D.C. metro area residents evacuate following a terrorist attack?

– If so, under what scenarios?

– If so, where might they go?

Page 7: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Key Findings– The public’s perceived risk of terror events is

high

– Large scale, uncontrolled self-evacuation will occur as a result of a terrorist attack

– Mass self-evacuation events are likely to be chaotic:

▪ stated target destinations are highly dispersed

▪ a large proportion of the public state awillingness to leave even absent

specific event information

Page 8: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Conclusion

– Planning for a large scale, chaotic evacuation into rural areas and states proximate to the DC Metro area warrants serious consideration.

Page 9: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Study Design

• Random-digit dial telephone survey of 800 households in the greater Washington, D.C. area

Maryland Counties:• Howard, Montgomery

Virginia Counties:• Arlington, Fairfax, Loudon, Prince William

West Virginia Counties:• Berkeley, Jefferson, Morgan

Page 10: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

On September 11th: What Information Sources did a Respondent Use to Track the Event?

Page 11: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

On September 11th: What Actions did Respondent Take on That Day (any that apply)?

Page 12: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Reported Mode of Self-Evacuation, if Evacuating From a Disaster

Page 13: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

If Evacuating, does Respondent have a Specific Target Destination?

Page 14: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Distribution of Reported Target Destinations if Self-Evacuating From a Natural Disaster

Page 15: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Identified Evacuation Target Destinations By State of Residence

Page 16: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Terror Events: Perceived Risk

Q1: How likely is this event to occur in DC?

Q2: How likely is significant injury to you and family from event?

Q3: How likely are multiple events?

Page 17: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Reported Propensity to Self-Evacuate Presented with three types of terror

incident scenarios, respondents who said they were “very” or “somewhat likely” to leave the area immediately:

Type of Attack “Very” & “Somewhat Likely”

Nuclear 83%

Radiological 76%

Chemical 67%

Page 18: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Reported Propensity to Self-Evacuate

Distribution of above responses by state: No statistically significant differences between residents of MD, VA, WV

Type of Attack “Very” & “Somewhat Likely”

Nuclear 83%

Radiological 76%

Chemical 67%

Page 19: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Information Sources on Self-Evacuation Decisions

What would your most important sources of information be in the aftermath of an event?

- 43% - News coverage of event

- 43% - Government announcements

If there were no local news coverage of the event available, would you stay in place?

- 67% - Likely to Stay

- 33% - Likely to Leave

Page 20: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

InferenceGiven

● the size of the population surrounding the DC area

● the reported propensity to self-evacuate, overwhelmingly by automobile,● the distribution of target destinations,● the perceived vulnerability of harm to terror attacks and anticipation of multiples attacks

Result: ● A large-scale, chaotic mass self-evacuation should be anticipated

Page 21: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Adherence to Shelter-in-Place and Evacuation Directives

Shelter in Place

Evacuate

Page 22: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Within Those Directive Adherence Numbers

Likelihood of respondent willingness to adhere to a shelter or evacuation directive – by “very likely” responses:

Type of

Attack:

Very likely to shelter in

place

Very likely to evacuate

Nuclear 60.6% 79.9%

Radiological 65.3% 77.5%

Chemical 65.9% 75.7%

Page 23: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Public Confidence in Evacuation Planning How much confidence do you have that the

federal government has adequate evacuation plans in place to deal with a…

A natural disaster

event?

a great amount

a moderate amount

very little

no trust at all

6.6%

36.8%

38.2%

18.5%

A terrorist event? a great amount

a moderate amount

very little

no trust at all

7.5%

36.3%

39.1%

17.1%

Page 24: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Conclusion: Summary ObservationsThe survey data indicate:

• Residents in the DC area express a relatively high degree of anticipated vulnerability to terror attacks

• Residents express a high propensity to self-evacuate and evacuation destinations are likely to be widely distributed geographically

• Absent available local information, a large proportion of area residents are likely to evacuate

• Residents also express low confidence in governmental evacuation planning on disaster events

Page 25: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

a

West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation

State Planners Workshop

WV Urban-Rural Task Force

Readiness Planning Overview

Page 26: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

WV Urban-Rural Task ForceJames W. Spears, Cabinet Secretary

Page 27: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Movement Issues

• “Effects of Catastrophic Events on Transportation System Management and Operations – The Pentagon and the National Capital Region”

• “Effects of Catastrophic Events on Transportation System Management and Operations – New York City – September 11”

• “Blue Cascades III, Pacific Northwest Economic Region’s Infrastructure’s Interdependencies Tabletop Exercise”

Page 28: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Movement Issues

• State and Regional Disaster Airlift (SARDA)- Provide Governor & others with a means to access and utilize aviation resources.- ensure availability of aviation resources in support of survival & recovery ops

• Security Control of Air Traffic and Air Navigational Aids (SCATANA)- civil and military selective and systematic shutdown of certain air navigational aids during emergencies when advisable in the national interest.

• Emergency Security Control of Air Traffic (ESCAT)- provides for the most effective use of airspace for defense supported activities

Page 29: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

WVURTF Mission

Identify means to:• Fulfill the Two Primary Functions of

Government:- Protect Citizens- Maintain Economy

• Support Intra-state & Regional Coordination• Establish Resource Readiness• Maintain Strategic Preparedness

Page 30: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

JITC-East

Camp DawsonVolkstone Industrial Facility – Instrumented Small Unit CQB

Netcentric Operational

Coordination Center (NOCC)

St. Albans, WV

Live, Virtual and Constructive

Network

Memorial Tunnel

CBRNE Training and Test Range

• Camp Dawson

• Memorial Tunnel

• Netcentric Operational Coordination Center

• JISOTF (Future)

Joint Combined Interagency Battlestaff Training Facility

Page 31: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

RSOIRECEPTION – STAGING – ONWARD MOVEMENT - INTEGRATION

• Control the Entry Points- Primary/Secondary routes “Support is there if you stay the course”- Information feed and flow (Public Radio, ITS, checkpoints)- KEEP THEM MOVING! Pass-through Movement

• Contraflow evacuation- WVDOT Emergency Operation and Personnel Support

• Secondary Routing to Support Emergency Operations- Private Airstrips- State Secondary & County Routes

Page 32: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

a

Route Management Issues

Page 33: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Route Management Issues• Early Warning• Traffic Control

- Choke Points- Breakdowns- Accidents- Flow

• Fuel supply• Limited Assets

- Personnel- Equipment- Highway Routes- Capacity

• Time of Year/Weather/Terrain

Page 34: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Regional Issues / Concerns

• What are the other state’s planning/doing?

• How do we communicate, command & control

• Deployment of resources should be maximized for effect (NO state lines…Regional Issue)

• R&R for Teams

• Families of Responders

Page 35: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Is there a need?

• Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said, “he has ordered a comprehensive plan for evacuating the region.”

• Chertoff said he convened a meeting with officials from as far away as West Virginia in addition to Delaware to focus on drawing up an evacuation plan for the Washington area.

…..Washington Post September 11, 2006

Page 36: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Where do we go from here?

• West Virginia hosted a regional meeting of states of the region to begin a collaborative process.

• The State is hosting regional planning meetings to discuss the impact of a mass evacuation on specific areas of the state.

• Continue to work together to achieve the prime objectives

Page 37: A Federal Emergency Management Agency September 19 - 22, 2006 West Virginia Urban-Rural Evacuation State Planners Workshop

Contact Information

Jimmy GianatoWV Division of Homeland Security

and Emergency Management304-558-5380

[email protected]