a new era begins live attenuated intranasal influenza vaccine
TRANSCRIPT
a New Era Begins
Live attenuated intranasal Influenza Vaccine
Some Considerations for Evaluation of a Live Vaccine
• Safety
• Efficacy
• Risk:Benefit
• Basis of Attenuation
• Transmission/ genetic stability
• Time to Development
• Cost
Structure of Influenza Virus(Type A and B)
Viral Genome 8 Negative-Sense RNA Segments
Viral Non-EnvelopeProteins: PB1, PB2, PA Polymerase Complex
NP
Matrix (M1)
Non-StructuralProteins
NS1, NEP
M2
Neuraminidase (NA)
Viral Envelope Proteins:
Hemagglutinin (HA)
Influenza Epidemiology / Burden of Disease
Influenza
Most common medically attended acute respiratory illness
Fever, chills, myalgia, cough, sore throat, nasal congestion, headache, malaise
Annual U.S. disease burden 20-50M people infected 20,000-50,000 deaths 70M lost work days and 38M lost school days Societal costs nearly $12B
MMWR 2001; American Lung Association, 3/01
Influenza-related Morbidity and Mortality
<5 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 >65
Pneumonia-Influenza Mortality
120
80
40
0
Age (Years)
80
40
0
30
20
10
0
Per 100,000
Per 10,000
Per 100
Hospitalizations
Medically Attended Illness
Rates
Glezen WP. Epidemiol Rev. 1996; 18(1),64-76.
20
60
Vaccination is primary method for prevention of disease Trivalent inactivated vaccine given IM Recommended 6-24 months, >50 years Virus “drift” dictates annual vaccination
Two manufacturers Aventis Pasteur Chiron (Powderject/Evans/Medeva)
80- 90M doses sold annually in U.S. Growing at 7%
Inactivated Influenza Vaccine
Current Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (TIV)
93 million doses of TIV sold in U.S. for 2002/2003, but
25M-50M annual influenza infections in the US
70M lost work days, 38M missed school days
Limitations of TIV vaccine program
150 million healthy people not vaccinated
<10% of healthy children, < 30% of healthy adults <30% of high risk children
Annual injection required
A live Flu vaccine meets a major public health need
Ease/ acceptance of administration
Live, cold-adapted, attenuated influenza virus Live, cold-adapted, attenuated influenza virus vaccine: current indication –healthy individuals 5-vaccine: current indication –healthy individuals 5-49 years of age49 years of age
Delivered by large particle intranasal mistDelivered by large particle intranasal mist
Trivalent blend of 10Trivalent blend of 107.07.0 infectious particles of each infectious particles of each strain: A/H1N1, A/H3N2, Bstrain: A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B
Induction of systemic IgG/IgA, local secretory IgA Induction of systemic IgG/IgA, local secretory IgA and cytotoxic T cell responsesand cytotoxic T cell responses
> 20 clinical trials completed; >25,000 subjects> 20 clinical trials completed; >25,000 subjects
First live attenuated Nasal Flu Vaccine- FluMist™
1967 1985 1989 19951976
Johnson1963 - 69
Nixon1969 - 74
Ford1974 - 77
Carter1977 - 81
Reagan1981 - 89
Bush1989 - 93
Clinton1993 - 01
By 2002, 25 separate influenza strains in over 28,000 people tested as CAIV reassortants
John Maassab describes cold
adapted influenza viruses
First human studies
with 6:2 CAIV reassortants
Four year efficacy study of
CAIV/TIV
First FluMisttm trial
2003
Bush, Jr.2001-
Live Influenza Vaccine Milestones:The First 36 years
FDA VRBPAC Review - #1
FDA VRBPA Review - #2
Licensure
6/17/03
Avironformed
Derivation of Cold-Adapted A & B Master Donor Viruses
Maassab, Nature; 1967
36oC
33oC
30oC
25oC
PCK CellsMultiplePassagesAt Reduced Temperatures
Plaque Purify 25oCPCK CellsPlaque Purify
EggAmplificationMDV- ca,ts,att
WT
Derivation of New Master Virus Strain
6:2 Master Virus Strain (ca, ts, att)
New Wild Type StrainMaster Donor Virus
Co-infect CellsCo-infect Cells
Six genes from Six genes from MDVMDV
confer confer ca, ts, att ca, ts, att phenotypephenotype
Hemagglutinin and Hemagglutinin and Neuraminidase Genes Neuraminidase Genes
from Wild Typefrom Wild Type
• In a Time & Motion study* of 497 pediatric subjects receiving intranasal flu vaccine, 12/497, or 2% cried
* Unpublished data
Intranasal Administration of FluMist tm
Clinical Studies
Flumisttm
Efficacy Trial Healthy Children Study AV006
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled two year trial
1,602 healthy children ages 15-71 months at entry
Active surveillance with illness cultures
Primary endpoint: culture-confirmed influenza
Circulating strains
A/Wuhan/359/95 (H3N2) and B/Beijing/184/93-like in Year 1
A/Sydney/05/97 (H3N2), a mismatched strain in Year 2
Safety of FluMist in Indicated Populations (Ages 5-49 years)
Generally safe and well tolerated
Most common side effects are mild and temporary Runny nose and other various cold-like
symptoms
No related serious adverse events
Pediatric Efficacy Trial (AV006): Results
Year 1 Year 2* Years 1 & 2Virus (n = 1602) (n = 1358)
A 95% 87%* 92%
B 91% 100% 91%
Either 93% 87% 92%
*H3N2 mismatched
Belshe et al. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338:1405Belshe et al. J Pediatr. 2000; 136:168
0
20
40
60
80
100
Vaccine (A/Wuhan) Variant (A/Sydney)
FluMist TIV
% S
e ro c
o nve
rsio
n (>
=4-
fold
ris
e)
HAI Antibody to H3N2 StrainsTwo dose regimen in seronegative children
Belshe et al., 2000Belshe et al., 2000
P<0.001
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Panama Wyoming Panama Wyoming
CAIV-T TIV
% S
er o
con
vers
ion
(>
=4
- fo l
d
rise
)
P<0.001P<0.001
P<0.001
Antibody to H3N2 After One Dose of CAIV-T or TIV in Seronegative
Infants
--------HAI assay------- ----Neutralization assay---
Wyoming strain is a Fujian-like antigenic variant to the Panama Wyoming strain is a Fujian-like antigenic variant to the Panama vaccine strainvaccine strain
FluMist Effectiveness Against Febrile Upper Respiratory Illness in
Healthy AdultsEndpoint Reduction p-valuea
Occurrence of: 21.9 % 0.010
Episodes of: 23.6 % <0.0001
Daysb of: 24.8 % <0.0001
Illness Associated Days of:Missed Work Health-care Provider VisitsPrescription AntibioticsOTC Medication Use
28.4 %40.9 %45.2 %28.0 %
<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
a Unadjusted for multiple comparisons.b Days per 1,000 participants per 7-week outbreak period.
Medically Attended Events in Children and Adolescents - Kaiser Study (AV019)
Randomized 2:1, double-blind, placebo-controlled
Safety of FluMist in 9,689 children
Outcomes examined from diagnosis in database over 42 days
>1,500 comparisons made without statistical adjustment
Emergency Department, Clinic, Hospital, and Combined
1-17 years, 1-8 years, 9-17 years, 18-35 mo., 12-17 mo.
Occurrence of Asthma (AV019)
Age FluMist n/N
Placebo n/N
Rate per 1000 person-months FluMist / Placebo
Binomial Relative Risk
(90% CI)
1 – 17 58 / 6473 30 / 3216 4.58 / 4.770.96 (0.66, 1.40)
P=.422
1 – 8 45 / 3769 21 / 1868 5.05 / 4.761.06
(0.69, 1.66) P=.418
18–35 mos.
16 / 728 2 / 369 9.30 / 2.294.06
(1.29, 17.86) P=.019
12–17 mos.
1 / 171 3 / 90 2.51 / 14.430.17
(0.01, 1.17) P=0.67
Asthma by Day Following Vaccination for Asthma by Day Following Vaccination for Participants 18Participants 18––35 Months of Age35 Months of Age
Relative Risk: 4.06 - but no temporal relationship within 42 days
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40
Day post Vaccination
Flu
Mis
t
0
1
2
3
Pla
ce
bo
FluMist
Placebo
Viruses detection rates in asthma/wheezing episodes in children
0
10
20
30
40
50
Picorn
a
Corona
Influ
enza
Paraf
luRSV
Oth
er
No Viru
s
% E
pis
od
es
Adapted from S Johnston, et al, BMJ,1995.
Genetic Basis of Attenuation
Flumisttm
Derivation of Cold-Adapted A & B Master Donor Viruses
36oC
33oC
30oC
25oC
PCK CellsMultiplePassagesAt Reduced Temperatures
Plaque Purify 25oCPCK CellsPlaque Purify
EggAmplificationMDV- ca,ts,att
WT
Sequence
Sequence
5 Amino Acid Changes Confer ts and att Phenotypes
PB2
PB1
PA
NP
M
NS
821(N)
1195 (K)
1766(E)
146(D)
PB2
PB1
PA
NP
M
NS
821(S)
1195 (E)
1766(G)
146(G)
non-ts ts
2005(T)
2005(A)
Shedding / Transmission
Flumisttm
Shedding and Infectivity of CAIV
Following challenge, % shedding, mean peak titer and mean duration of shedding are higher in young children than adults
HID50 lower in young children compared to adults
Population % SheddingMean Peak Titer
(Log 10 TCID50/mL)
Mean Duration
(days)
Children 67 - 91 2.1 – 3.4 4.5 – 9.0
Adults 14 - 60 0.7 – 1.8 0.6 – 1.9
Virus Shedding
Population HID50 (Log10 TCID50)
Children 2.5 – 4.6
Adults 4.9 – 6.4
Virus Infectivity
Reviewed In Murphy, Inf. Dis. In Clin Prac, 1993
Reviewed In Murphy & Coelingh, Viral Immunol, 2002
Finnish Daycare TrialWyeth, unpublished data
Randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled
197 children age 8 months - 36 months
51 playgroups
Average of 4.1 study children per playgroup
Children attended daycare > 3 days/week and > 4 hours/day
Each placebo child exposed to an average of 1.9 vaccinees
Shedding of influenza A and B in Children – Finnish Trial
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 4 8 12 16 20 24
Days Post Vaccination
% S
ub
ject
s
A
B
Type B Shed from Vaccinee
Type B Shed from Placebo
Calculated transmission
probability0.006
Coding Changes Observed in Viruses Shed from Children Do Not Overlap with
ts or att loci
PB2
PB1
PA
NP
M
NS
821(N)
1195 (K)
1766(E)
146(D)
2005(T)
340(V)
198(E)
1304(C/S)
789(F-M2)
PB2
PB1
PA
NP
M
NS
499(H/Q)
399(V/A)
1286(P/H)
571(M/V)
718(M)
MDV-A MDV-Bts/att locus
Coding change observed in >1 clinical isolate
1320(V/M)
Conclusions/ Issues1) Flumisttm is safe and effective in healthy children and adults
2) Flumisttm phenotypes (ts, att) are multigenic and stable
3) Flumisttm has a low transmission rate
4) The road from invention to licensure is long and unpredictable, as is the road to acceptance
5) Major issues to be resolved :
a. Relationship of Flumisttm to asthma
b. Safety and efficacy in 50-64 year olds
c. reverse genetics to select new vaccines
d. concurrent vaccination: safety/ efficacy
e. cost
f. Heterotypic immunity
Optimal Indication for a Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine
Healthy children and healthy adults ages 6 months to 65
years
“The End of the Vaccination Man Era”
Acknowledgements
A) Medimmune Vaccines C) Investigator Community
K Coelingh
G. Kemble B. Belshe
R. Spaete K. Nichol
E. Hoffmann S. Black
H. Jin J. Maassab
P. Mendelman Others
Clinical Group
B) NIH
B. Murphy
R. Chanock
The VTEUs
Others