a profile of ou 1 st year students ogl session april 30, 2013 reuben ternes research associate, oira...
TRANSCRIPT
A Profile of OU 1st Year Students
OGL Session April 30, 2013
Reuben TernesResearch Associate, OIRA
Cassandra BarraganAssessment Coordinator, OIRA
Presentation Overview
•Who Are OU FTIACs?▫Institutional Data▫Values and Expectations▫Academic Success▫College Engagement
Part 1: Institutional Data
•Various pieces of information that our office (OIRA) collects on OU’s student body.
•All kinds of information can be found on our website:▫www.oakland.edu/oira▫Including this power point!
Growth in FTIACs 2000 - 2011
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
18881905186821012053
22132287234023502466
231123612464
FTIACs: Average ACT Score
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
AVG ACT S...
FTIAC Gender Ratios
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Male
37 35 40 37 38 38 39 38 39 40
Female
63 65 60 63 62 62 61 62 61 60
32.5
42.5
52.5
62.5
Perc
en
t
FTIAC Ethnicity
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
All Other EthnicitiesWhite
About half of OU’s non-white ethnicities are African American students
Undergraduate Age (All UG Students)
Fall 2004
Fall 2005
Fall 2006
Fall 2007
Fall 2008
Fall 2009
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
17-2223-2425-3435+
Full Time/Part-Time Status (All UG Students)
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
FT PT
Part 2: Values and Expectations
• The CIRP survey• Cooperative Institutional Research
Project conducted by the Higher Education Research Institute at the University of California at Los Angeles• We get an average of 70 to 80% response
rate on this survey.• In general, we are more similar to
national norms than we are dissimilar.
Important reasons in deciding to go to college
Percentage of Students Answering ‘Very Important’
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2009 20120%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
OU STUDENT TRENDS OF REASONS IN DECIDING TO GO TO COLLEGE: 1995 - 2012
JOB MONEY EDUCATION
Important reasons to select OU
2005
2006
2007
2009
2010
2011
2012
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Good academic rep-utation Good social repu-tationGraduates go to top grad schoolsGraduates get good jobs
% C
HO
OS
ING
VE
RY
IM
-P
OR
TA
NT
Important Life Objectives
Keeping up to date with politics
Racial understanding
Be a community leader
Adopting "green" lifestyle
Influencing social values
Develop life philosophy
Successfully own business
Obtaining recognition in field
Becoming an authority in field
Helping others
Raising a family
Being well off financially
0% 10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
OU 2012 OU 2011 OU 2010
Estimated Parental Income
less
than
$30
,000
$30,
000
to $
59,9
99
$60,
000
to $
99,9
99
$100
,000
or m
ore
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
OUPublic (Low Selectiv-ity)All Public 4-Years
Drank beer during high school year
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2009
2011
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
OUNational
Perc
en
t R
esp
on
din
g O
cca-
sion
all
y/F
req
uen
tly
OU students’ political views
Far le
ft
Libe
ral
Mid
dle-
of-th
e-ro
ad
Conse
rvat
ive
Far ri
ght
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
OUNational
Admissions Acceptances and Student Choices
OU Peer0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Accepted by 1st Choice SchoolWas This Your 1st Choice School?
Part 3: Academic success
•Graduation Rates•Retention Rates•Probation Rates•Info compiled by OIRA
First Semester Probation Rates (FTIACs)
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
Retention to second year
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
First Year Retention Rates
Six-Year Graduation Rates by 1st-term credits
14+ Credits
12 or 13 Credits
Part 4: College engagement
• College student survey that assesses the extent to which students engage in educational practices associated with high levels of learning and development▫ Administered every two years.▫ OU has shown steady increases in NSSE results
since 2005▫ More data is available on OIRA’s website.
• All data is for 1st year students unless otherwise noted.
National Survey of Student Engagement
(NSSE: pronounced ‘nessie’)
More than 10 hours per week working off campus
Class OaklandSelected
Peers
Freshmen 46% 27%
Seniors 70% 57%
“the environment emphasizes spending significant amounts of time on academic work”
2002 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 20122.9
2.95
3
3.05
3.1
3.15
3.2
3.25
OU Peers
Very Much
(4)
Some(2)
Time Spent preparing for class
11-15 HoursPer Week(4.0)
6-10 Hours Per Week(3.0)
2002 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 20123
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
4
4.2
OUPeer
Quality of Relationships with other students
2002 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 20124.6
4.8
5
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.8
OU Peers
Friendly & Supportive
Unfriendly & unsupportive
Questions and discussion
?