a project report on a perceptional analysis on ...

Upload: giridhar-prabhu

Post on 04-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    1/67

    A PROJECT REPORT ON

    A Perceptional Analysis On

    Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    Submitted to

    OSMANIA UNVERSITY

    For

    The partial fulfillment of B.com (Honours) Degree Course

    (2009-2012)

    By

    Vibhore Goel

    (Roll No. : 110009407136)

    INDIAN INSTITUE OF MANAGEMENT AND COMMERCE

    Adj. to Telephone Bhavan, Khairtabad.

    Hyderabad 500 004.

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    2/67

    DECLARATION

    I, Vibhore Goel, student of Indian Institute Of Management and Commerce

    (Khairtabad), Hyderabad, affiliated to Osmania University pursuing B.COM HONOURS

    hereby declare that the project work entitled A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of

    Social Networking Websites At Worksubmitted to Indian Institute Of Management and

    Commerce is a record of an original work done by me under the guidance of my

    supervisor, Mr. A.V. Ayyapu Reddy, Faculty Member of IIMC.

    1100-09-407-136

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    3/67

    CERTIFICATE

    This is to certify that Vibhore Goel, bearing Hall Ticket No. 1100-09-407-136 has

    satisfactorily completed the project work on A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of

    Social Networking Websites At Workunder the guidance of Mr. A.V. Ayyapu Reddy,

    project supervisor in partial fulfillment of B.COM HONOURS course during 2011-2012

    as prescribed by OSMANIA UNIVERSITY, Hyderabad.

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    4/67

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    I would like to express my deep sense of gratitude to all those who have assisted and

    guided me in the completion of my project work and helped me achieve the objectives

    of the study.

    I would like to thank all the respondents of the survey who have given their valuable

    time to answer the questionnaire.

    I am also thankful to our college principle, Mr. K. Raghuveer, and vice principle, Mr. A.V.

    Ayyapu Reddy who is also my project supervisor, for guiding me throughout the study

    and helping me in successfully completing the project.

    I also thank our college librarian, Mrs. S. Geeta who has assisted me in finding valuable

    information whenever necessary.

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    5/67

    INDEX

    Unit No. Topic Page No.

    1 Introduction To SocialNetworking

    1

    2 Objectives AndMethodology

    13

    3 Facebook And TwitterProfile And Social

    Networking At Work

    17

    4 Analysis OfPerception Towards

    Social Networking

    32

    5 Conclusions AndSuggestions

    54

    Bibliography

    Annexure

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    6/67

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    7/67

    Page | 1

    UNIT 1

    INTRODUCTION TO SOCIAL NETWORKING

    Contents:

    Social NetworkingMeaning

    History

    Social Impact and Interaction

    Typical Structure of the websitesEmerging trends in social networking

    Application Domains

    Issues

    Market share of Social Networking Websites

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    8/67

    Page | 2

    SOCIAL NETWORKING

    A social networking service is an online service, platform, or site that focuses on

    building and reflecting of social networks or social relations among people, who, for

    example, share interests and/or activities. A social network service consists of a

    representation of each user (often a profile), his/her social links, and a variety of

    additional services. Most social network services are web-based and provide means for

    users to interact over the Internet, such as e-mail and instant messaging. Online

    community services are sometimes considered as a social network service, though in a

    broader sense, social network service usually means an individual-centered service

    whereas online community services are group-centered. Social networking sites allow

    users to share ideas, activities, events, and interests within their individual networks.

    The main types of social networking services are those that contain category places

    (such as former school year or classmates), means to connect with friends (usually with

    self-description pages), and a recommendation system linked to trust. Popular methods

    now combine many of these, with Facebook, Google+ and Twitter widely used

    worldwide.

    History

    The potential for computer networking to facilitate new forms of computer-mediated

    social interaction was suggested early on. Efforts to support social networks via

    computer-mediated communication were made in many early online services, including

    Usenet, ARPANET, LISTSERV, and bulletin board services (BBS). Many prototypical

    features of social networking sites were also present in online services such as America

    Online, Prodigy, and CompuServe. Early social networking on the World Wide Web

    began in the form of generalized online communities such as Theglobe.com (1995),

    Geocities (1994) and Tripod.com (1995). Many of these early communities focused on

    bringing people together to interact with each other through chat rooms, and

    encouraged users to share personal information and ideas via personal web pages by

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulletin_board_systemhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_Onlinehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_Onlinehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prodigy_%28online_service%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CompuServehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geocitieshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tripod.comhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tripod.comhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geocitieshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CompuServehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prodigy_%28online_service%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_Onlinehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_Onlinehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulletin_board_systemhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    9/67

    Page | 3

    providing easy-to-use publishing tools and free or inexpensive web space. Some

    communities - such as Classmates.com - took a different approach by simply having

    people link to each other via email addresses. In the late 1990s, user profiles became a

    central feature of social networking sites, allowing users to compile lists of "friends" and

    search for other users with similar interests. New social networking methods were

    developed by the end of the 1990s, and many sites began to develop more advanced

    features for users to find and manage friends. This newer generation of social

    networking sites began to flourish with the emergence of SixDegrees.com in 1997,

    followed by Makeoutclub in 2000, Friendster in 2002, and soon became part of the

    Internet mainstream. Friendster was followed by MySpace and LinkedIn a year later,

    and, finally, Bebo. Attesting to the rapid increase in social networking sites' popularity,

    by 2005, it was reported that MySpace was getting more page views than Google.

    Facebook, launched in 2004, has since become the largest social networking site in the

    world.

    Social Impact

    Web-based social networking services make it possible to connect people who share

    interests and activities across political, economic, and geographic borders. Through e-

    mail and instant messaging, online communities are created where a gift economy andreciprocal altruism are encouraged through cooperation. Information is particularly

    suited to gift economy, as information is a non-rival good and can be gifted at practically

    no cost.

    Facebook and other social networking tools is increasingly the object of scholarly

    research. Scholars in many fields have begun to investigate the impact of social-

    networking sites, investigating how such sites may play into issues of identity, privacy,

    social capital, youth culture, and education.

    Social Interaction

    Put simply, social networking is a way for one person to meet up with other people on

    the Net. That's not all though. Some people use social networking sites for meeting new

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classmates.comhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_profilehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SixDegrees.comhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MySpacehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LinkedInhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bebohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MySpacehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebookhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_communitieshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gift_economyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reciprocal_altruismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gift_economyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonrival_goodhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebookhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_%28social_science%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_capitalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Youth_culturehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Educationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Educationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Youth_culturehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_capitalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_%28social_science%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebookhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonrival_goodhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gift_economyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reciprocal_altruismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gift_economyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_communitieshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebookhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MySpacehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bebohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LinkedInhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MySpacehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SixDegrees.comhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_profilehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classmates.com
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    10/67

    Page | 4

    friends on the Net. Other's use it to find old friends. Then there are those who use it to

    find people who have the same problems or interests they have, this is called niche

    networking. Following this trend is the emerging trend of people meeting online to meet

    offline. More and more relationships and friendships are being formed online and then

    carried to an offline/in person setting. Social networking sites play a vital role in this area

    as well, being able to meet someone as a "friend" and see what common interests you

    share and how they have built up their friend base and "likes" you can truly see a more

    whole picture of the person you are talking with and most sites are free instead of being

    pay based which allows younger people with stricter budgets to enjoy some of the same

    features.

    Typical structure of these websites

    Basics

    Social networking sites share some conventional features. Most often, individual users

    are encouraged to create profiles containing much information about them. Users can

    often upload pictures of themselves to their profiles, post blog entries for others to read,

    search for other users with similar interests, and compile and share lists of contacts. In

    addition, user profiles often have a section dedicated to comments from friends and

    other users. To protect user privacy, social networks usually have controls that allow

    users to choose who can view their profile, contact them, add them to their list of

    contacts, and so on.

    Additional features

    Some social networks have additional features, such as the ability to create groups that

    share common interests or affiliations, upload or stream live videos, and hold

    discussions in forums.Lately, mobile social networking has become popular. In most

    mobile communities, mobile phone users can now create their own profiles, make

    friends, participate in chat rooms, create chat rooms, hold private conversations, share

    photos and videos, and share blogs by using their mobile phone. One of the most

    popular wireless services for social networking in North America is Facebook Mobile.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_%28online_social_networking%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_%28online_social_networking%29
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    11/67

    Page | 5

    Emerging trends in social networking

    As the increase in popularity of social networking is on a constant rise, new uses for the

    technology are constantly being observed.

    At the forefront of emerging trends in social networking sites is the concept of "real-time

    web" and "location-based." Real-time allows users to contribute content, which is then

    broadcast as it is being uploaded - the concept is analogous to live radio and television

    broadcasts. Twitterset the trend for "real-time" services, wherein users can broadcast

    to the world what they are doing, or what is on their minds within a 140-character limit.

    Facebook followed suit with their "Live Feed" where users' activities are streamed as

    soon as it happens. While Twitter focuses on words, Clixtr, another real-time service,

    focuses on group photo sharing wherein users can update their photo streams with

    photos while at an event.

    Companies have begun to merge business technologies and solutions, such as cloud

    computing, with social networking concepts. Instead of connecting individuals based on

    social interest, companies are developing interactive communities that connect

    individuals based on shared business needs or experiences. Many provide specialized

    networking tools and applications that can be accessed via their websites, such as

    LinkedIn. Others companies, such as Monster.com, have been steadily developing a

    more "socialized" feel to their career center sites to harness some of the power of social

    networking sites. These more business related sites have their own nomenclature for

    the most part but the most common naming conventions are "Vocational Networking

    Sites" or "Vocational Media Networks", with the former more closely tied to individual

    networking relationships based on social networking principles.

    Foursquare gained popularity as it allowed for users to "check-in" to places that they arefrequenting at that moment. Gowalla is another such service that functions in much the

    same way that Foursquare does, leveraging the GPS in phones to create a location-

    based user experience. Clixtr, though in the real-time space, is also a location-based

    social networking site, since events created by users are automatically geotagged, and

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_webhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_webhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebookhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clixtrhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applicationshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LinkedInhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monster.comhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foursquare_%28service%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gowallahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPShttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPShttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gowallahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foursquare_%28service%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monster.comhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LinkedInhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applicationshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clixtrhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebookhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_webhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_web
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    12/67

    Page | 6

    users can view events occurring nearby through the Clixtr iPhone app. Recently, Yelp

    announced its entrance into the location-based social networking space through check-

    ins with their mobile app; whether or not this becomes detrimental to Foursquare or

    Gowalla is yet to be seen, as it is still considered a new space in the Internet technology

    industry.

    Social networks and science

    One other use that is being discussed is the use of social networks in the science

    communities. Julia Porter Liebeskind et al. have published a study on how new

    biotechnology firms are using social networking sites to share exchanges in scientific

    knowledge. They state in their study that by sharing information and knowledge with

    one another, they are able to "increase both their learning and their flexibility in ways

    that would not be possible within a self-contained hierarchical organization." Social

    networking is allowing scientific groups to expand their knowledge base and share

    ideas, and without these new means of communicating their theories might become

    "isolated and irrelevant".

    Social networks and education

    Social networks are also being used by teachers and students as a communication tool.

    Because many students are already using a wide-range of social networking sites,

    teachers have begun to familiarize themselves with this trend and are now using it to

    their advantage. Teachers and professors are doing everything from creating chat-room

    forums and groups to extend classroom discussion to posting assignments, tests and

    quizzes, to assisting with homework outside of the classroom setting. Social networks

    are also being used to foster teacher-parent communication. These sites make it

    possible and more convenient for parents to ask questions and voice concerns withouthaving to meet face-to-face. The advent of social networking platforms may also be

    impacting the way(s) in which learners engage with technology in general. The use of

    online social networks by libraries is also an increasingly prevalent and growing tool that

    is being used to communicate with more potential library users, as well as extending the

    services provided by individual libraries.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPhonehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yelp,_Inc.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yelp,_Inc.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPhone
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    13/67

    Page | 7

    Business model

    Few social networks currently charge money for membership. In part, this may be

    because social networking is a relatively new service, and the value of using them has

    not been firmly established in customers' minds. Companies such as MySpace and

    Facebook sell online advertising on their site. Their business model is based upon large

    membership count, and charging for membership would be counterproductive. Some

    believe that the deeper information that the sites have on each user will allow much

    better targeted advertising than any other site can currently provide.

    Social networks operate under an autonomous business model, in which a social

    network's members serve dual roles as both the suppliers and the consumers of

    content. This is in contrast to a traditional business model, where the suppliers and

    consumers are distinct agents. Revenue is typically gained in the autonomous business

    model via advertisements, but subscription-based revenue is possible when

    membership and content levels are sufficiently high.

    Application domains

    Government applications

    Social networking is more recently being used by various government agencies. Social

    networking tools serve as a quick and easy way for the government to get the opinion of

    the public and to keep the public updated on their activity. The Centers for Disease

    Control demonstrated the importance of vaccinations on the popular children's site

    Whyville and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has a virtual island

    on Second Life where people can explore underground caves or explore the effects of

    global warming. Likewise, NASA has taken advantage of a few social networking tools,

    including Twitterand Flickr.

    Business applications

    The use of social networking services in an enterprise context presents the potential of

    having a major impact on the world of business and work.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MySpacehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebookhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_advertisinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centers_for_Disease_Controlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centers_for_Disease_Controlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccinationshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whyvillehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Oceanic_and_Atmospheric_Administrationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Lifehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flickrhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flickrhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Lifehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Oceanic_and_Atmospheric_Administrationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whyvillehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccinationshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centers_for_Disease_Controlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centers_for_Disease_Controlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_advertisinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebookhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MySpace
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    14/67

    Page | 8

    Social networks connect people at low cost; this can be beneficial forentrepreneurs and

    small businesses looking to expand their contact bases. These networks often act as a

    customer relationship management tool for companies selling products and services.

    Companies can also use social networks for advertising in the form of banners and text

    ads. Since businesses operate globally, social networks can make it easier to keep in

    touch with contacts around the world.

    Applications for social networking sites have extended toward businesses and brands

    are creating their own, high functioning sites, a sector known as brand networking. It is

    the idea a brand can build its consumer relationship by connecting their consumers to

    the brand image on a platform that provides them relative content, elements of

    participation, and a ranking or score system. Brand networking is a new way tocapitalize on social trends as a marketing tool.

    Social and political applications

    Social networking sites have recently showed a value in social and political movements.

    In the Egyptian revolution, Facebook and Twitter both played a pivotal role in keeping

    people connected to the revolt. Egyptian activist have credited social networking sites

    with providing a platform for planning protest and sharing news from Tahrir Square in

    real time. By presenting a platform for thousands of people to instantaneously share

    videos of mainly events featuring brutality, social networking proves to be a vital tool in

    revolutions.

    Educational applications

    The National School Boards Association reports that almost 60 percent of students who

    use social networking talk about education topics online, and more than 50 percent talk

    specifically about schoolwork. Yet the vast majority of school districts have stringent

    rules against nearly all forms of social networking during the school day even though

    students and parents report few problem behaviors online.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entrepreneurhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_businesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brand_networkinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_School_Boards_Associationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_School_Boards_Associationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brand_networkinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_businesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entrepreneur
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    15/67

    Page | 9

    Social networks focused on supporting relationships between teachers and their

    students are now used for learning, educator professional development, and content

    sharing. Ning for teachers, TermWiki, Learn Central, TeachStreet and other sites are

    being built to foster relationships that include educational blogs, eportfolios, formal and

    ad hoc communities, as well as communication such as chats, discussion threads, and

    synchronous forums. These sites also have content sharing and rating features.

    Issues

    Effecting the productivity of employees

    The use of social networking sites has become very easy in todays world of growing

    technology. Anyone can access his or her profile with just an operating system and internet

    connectivity. Employees at work often get tempted to use these websites. They use social

    media extensively while working at office. It is argued that it decreases their productivity and

    efficiency and thus decreases the companys profits. Another perspective is that using such

    sites relieves the employees stress and helps the business in many other ways. The main issue

    arising in many parts of the world is whether social media be banned at workplace or not.

    Privacy

    Privacy concerns with social networking services have been raised growing concerns

    amongst users on the dangers of giving out too much personal information and the

    threat ofsexual predators. Users of these services also need to be aware of data theft

    orviruses. However, large services, such as MySpace and Netlog, often work with law

    enforcement to try to prevent such incidents.

    In addition, there is a perceived privacy threat in relation to placing too much personal

    information in the hands of large corporations or governmental bodies, allowing a profile

    to be produced on an individual's behavior on which decisions, detrimental to anindividual, may be taken.

    Furthermore, there is an issue over the control of datainformation that was altered or

    removed by the user may in fact be retained and/or passed to third parties. This danger

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TeachStreethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy_concerns_with_social_networking_serviceshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_predatorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_insecurityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_virushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MySpacehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netloghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netloghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MySpacehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_virushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_insecurityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_predatorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy_concerns_with_social_networking_serviceshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TeachStreet
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    16/67

    Page | 10

    was highlighted when the controversial social networking site Quechup harvested e-mail

    addresses from users' e-mail accounts for use in a spamming operation.

    Privacy on social networking sites can be undermined by many factors. For example,

    users may disclose personal information, sites may not take adequate steps to protect

    user privacy, and third parties frequently use information posted on social networks for a

    variety of purposes. "For the Net generation, social networking sites have become the

    preferred forum for social interactions, from posturing and role playing to simply

    sounding off. However, because such forums are relatively easy to access, posted

    content can be reviewed by anyone with an interest in the users' personal information".

    Access to information

    Many social networking services, such as Facebook, provide the user with a choice of

    who can view their profile. This prevents unauthorized user(s) from accessing their

    information. Parents who want to access their child's MySpace or Facebook account

    have become a big problem for teenagers who do not want their profile seen by their

    parents. By making their profile private, teens can select who may see their page,

    allowing only people added as "friends" to view their profile and preventing unwanted

    viewing of the profile by parents. Most teens are constantly trying to create a structural

    barrier between their private life and their parents. To edit information on a certain social

    networking service account, the social networking sites require you to login or provide a

    password. This prevents unauthorized user(s) from adding, changing, or removing

    personal information, pictures, and/or other data.

    Potential for misuse

    The relative freedom afforded by social networking services has caused concern

    regarding the potential of its misuse by individual patrons. In October 2006, a fake

    Myspace profile created in the name of Josh Evans by Lori Janine Drew led to the

    suicide ofMegan Meier. The event incited global concern regarding the use of social

    networking services for bullying purposes.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quechuphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_spamhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loginhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passwordhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myspacehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_of_Megan_Meierhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_of_Megan_Meierhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myspacehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passwordhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loginhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_spamhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quechup
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    17/67

    Page | 11

    At the same time, genuine use of social networking services has been treated with

    suspicion on the ground of the services' misuse. In September 2008, the profile of

    Australian Facebook user Elmo Keep was banned by the site's administrators on the

    grounds that it violated the site's terms of use. Keep is one of several users of Facebook

    who were banned from the site on the presumption that their names aren't real, as they

    bear resemblance the names of characters like Sesame Street's Elmo.

    Interpersonal communication

    Interpersonal communication has been a growing issue as more and more people have

    turned to social networking as a means of communication. "Benniger (1987) describes

    how mass media has gradually replaced interpersonal communication as a socializing

    force. Further, social networking sites have become popular sites for youth culture to

    explore them, relationships, and share cultural artifacts". Many teens and social

    networking users may be harming their interpersonal communication by using sites

    such as Facebook and MySpace. Stated by Baroness Greenfield, an Oxford University

    Neuroscientist, "My fear is that these technologies are infantilizing the brain into the

    state of small children who are attracted by buzzing noises and bright lights, who have a

    small attention span and who live for the moment." The convenience that social network

    sites give users to communicate with one another can also damage their interpersonal

    communication.

    Psychological effects of social networking

    As social networking sites have raised in popularity over the past years, people have

    been spending an excessive amount of time on the Internet in general and social

    networking sites in specific. This has led researchers to debate the establishment of

    Internet addiction as an actual clinical disorder. Social networking can also affect theextent to which a person feels lonely. In a Newsweek article, Johannah Cornblatt

    explains Social-networking sites like Facebook and MySpace may provide people with

    a false sense of connection that ultimately increases loneliness in people who feel

    alone.

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    18/67

    Page | 12

    Market share

    According to ComScore, up to end of November 2011:

    WORLDWIDE UNIQUE

    VISITORS

    (000)

    Percentage

    Facebook

    Twitter

    Linkedln

    Google Plus

    MySpace

    Others

    Total

    792,999

    167,903

    94,823

    66756

    61,037

    255,539

    1,438,877

    55.1%

    11.7%

    6.6%

    4.6%

    4.2%

    17.8%

    100%

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ComScorehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ComScore
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    19/67

    Page | 13

    UNIT 2

    OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    20/67

    Page | 14

    Objectives

    To elicit the consumer perception towards internet and social networkingwebsites.

    To know the most used social networking service.

    To analyze the data obtained and come to a consensus whether people wouldlike to ban use of social networking sites in office premises or not.

    Methodology

    Data should be analyzed and presented in a simple and proper manner such that

    people are able to understand it easily. Data analysis goes through various stages of

    data collection, sorting, analyzing, interpreting and presenting it. Data analysis has

    different approaches by different people.

    The first step is to collect the data from various sources that are available. This data is

    raw and unorganized. The next step is to sort the data so that analyzing it becomes

    easy. Sorting is done according to the purpose. Analysis is done on this data using

    various tools. Tables and graphs are made to present this data. Observations are

    carried out and interpretations are made according to the data collected.

    The final step is to present the data in a structural manner so that people are able to

    understand it quickly and easily. First a table is created according to the data collected.

    It is followed a graphical representation in the form of columns and bars. Lastly, a

    meaningful interpretation is made which is based on the data. This is the organized and

    meaningful data. The presentation of data should look attractive so that people feel

    interested to look at the data and use it.

    Sample of the survey

    A sample of 100 people has been selected for the purpose of carrying out the survey.

    Their views about social networking were taken irrespective of whether they use the

    sites or not. The sample was randomly selected.

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    21/67

    Page | 15

    Method of data collection

    There was a twofold method of collecting the data for this project.

    Primary data- A questionnaire method was used to collect primary data. A total of

    21 questions were part of the questionnaire which were asked to find out about

    the different the perspectives of different people towards social networking. This

    data was systematically presented in the form of tables, charts and bar graphs

    and then interpretation was made accordingly.

    Secondary data- Secondary data was collected from various sources such as

    newspapers, internet, magazines, journals and various other books. This data is

    used to focus on the problem in detail and contains various facts relating to the

    topic.

    Period of study

    The period of study was spread across 3 to 4 weeks. A survey was conducted to collect

    primary data and secondary data was collected through other sources.

    Implications of the study

    There have been various implications of the study. This study was useful in finding out

    how much time people spend on internet and how much time is allocated to social

    networking. The project was useful in finding out the most used and most popular social

    networking website among people which was Facebook. This study helped to know

    whether people use these sites while work or study and whether they knew its pros and

    cons.

    This project helped in creating awareness about the advantages and disadvantages of

    using social media in office. Finally, it helped to elicit the consumer perception towards

    social networking websites.

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    22/67

    Page | 16

    Limitations of the study

    The sample size was limited to a number of 100 people only. Since the sample

    size was small, the study may or may not have reflected the accurate

    characteristics of the general public.

    It was assumed that all the respondents who were part of the study knew about

    the social networking sites.

    The survey was taken up for a limited period of 3 to 4 weeks. Thus, it does not

    present the changes in the attitude of the people which occur over a period of

    time.

    A major limitation of any survey is that we cannot generalize the data to all thepeople. Different people have different thinking and thus every aspect of each

    individual could not be covered under the study. Another study with a much

    larger sample and spread across a long period of time could more efficiently

    bring out whether people would like to ban social networking while working or

    not. Further research could widen the frame of reference by drawing on larger samples

    nationally and internationally and addressing users of different ages and demographic

    profiles. Further investigation into this model could clarify and confirm its importance in

    business and industry.

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    23/67

    Page | 17

    UNIT 3

    Profile of Facebook and Twitter

    Advantages and disadvantages of using Social Networking

    Websites at work

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    24/67

    Page | 18

    Profile

    Facebook is a social networking service and website launched in February 2004,

    operated and privately owned by Facebook, Inc. As of February 2012, Facebook has

    more than 845 million active users. Users must register before using the site, after

    which they may create a personal profile, add other users as friends, and exchange

    messages, including automatic notifications when they update their profile. Additionally,

    users may join common-interest user groups, organized by workplace, school or

    college, or other characteristics, and categorize their friends into lists such as "People

    From Work" or "Close Friends". The name of the service stems from the colloquial

    name for the book given to students at the start of the academic year by some

    university administrations in the United States to help students get to know each other.

    Facebook allows any users who declare themselves to be at least 13 years old to

    become registered users of the site.

    Facebook was founded by Mark Zuckerberg with his college roommates and fellow

    students Eduardo Saverin, Dustin Moskovitz and Chris Hughes. The Web site's

    membership was initially limited by the founders to Harvard students, but was expanded

    to other colleges in the Boston area, the Ivy League, and Stanford University. It

    gradually added support for students at various other universities before opening to high

    school students, and eventually to anyone aged 13 and over. However, based on

    ConsumersReports.org in May 2011, there are 7.5 million children under 13 with

    accounts, violating the site's terms of service.

    A January 2009 Compete.com study ranked Facebook as the most used social

    networking service by worldwide monthly active users.Entertainment Weekly included

    the site on its end-of-the-decade "best-of" list, saying, "How on earth did we stalk our

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_networking_servicehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_%28directory%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_%28directory%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Zuckerberghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduardo_Saverinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dustin_Moskovitzhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Hugheshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvardhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bostonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivy_Leaguehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_Universityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compete.comhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entertainment_Weeklyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entertainment_Weeklyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entertainment_Weeklyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entertainment_Weeklyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compete.comhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_Universityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivy_Leaguehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bostonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvardhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Hugheshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dustin_Moskovitzhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduardo_Saverinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Zuckerberghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_%28directory%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_%28directory%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_networking_service
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    25/67

    Page | 19

    exes, remember our co-workers' birthdays, bug our friends, and play a rousing game of

    Scrabulous before Facebook?" Quantcast estimates Facebook has 138.9 million

    monthly unique U.S. visitors in May 2011. According to Social Media Today, in April

    2010 an estimated 41.6% of the U.S. population had a Facebook account.

    Nevertheless, Facebook's market growth started to stall in some regions, with the site

    losing 7 million active users in the United States and Canada in May 2011. Facebook

    filed for an initial public offering on February 1, 2012.

    History

    Mark Zuckerberg wrote Facemash, the predecessor to Facebook, on October 28, 2003,

    while attending Harvard as a sophomore. According to The Harvard Crimson, the site

    was comparable to Hot or Not, and "used photos compiled from the online facebooks of

    nine houses, placing two next to each other at a time and asking users to choose the

    'hotter' person".

    To accomplish this, Zuckerberg hacked into the protected areas of Harvard's computer

    network and copied the houses' private dormitory ID images. Harvard at that time did

    not have a student "facebook" (a directory with photos and basic information).

    Facemash attracted 450 visitors and 22,000 photo-views in its first four hours online.

    The site was quickly forwarded to several campus group list-servers, but was shut down

    a few days later by the Harvard administration. Zuckerberg was charged by the

    administration with breach of security, violating copyrights, and violating individual

    privacy, and faced expulsion. Ultimately, however, the charges were dropped.

    Zuckerberg expanded on this initial project that semester by creating a social study tool

    ahead of an art history final, by uploading 500 Augustan images to a Web site, with one

    image per page along with a comment section. He opened the site up to his classmates,

    and people started sharing their notes.

    The following semester, Zuckerberg began writing code for a new Web site in January

    2004. He was inspired, he said, by an editorial in The Harvard Crimson about the

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexuloushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantcasthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initial_public_offeringhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvard_Universityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Harvard_Crimsonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Harvard_Crimsonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_or_Nothttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_%28computer_security%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ID_cardhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_%28directory%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyrighthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_historyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Romehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Romehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_historyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyrighthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_%28directory%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ID_cardhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_%28computer_security%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_or_Nothttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Harvard_Crimsonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvard_Universityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initial_public_offeringhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantcasthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexulous
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    26/67

    Page | 20

    Facemash incident. On February 4, 2004, Zuckerberg launched "Thefacebook",

    originally located at thefacebook.com.

    Membership was initially restricted to students of Harvard College, and within the first

    month, more than half the undergraduate population at Harvard was registered on the

    service. Eduardo Saverin (business aspects), Dustin Moskovitz (programmer), Andrew

    McCollum (graphic artist), and Chris Hughes soon joined Zuckerberg to help promote

    the Web site. In March 2004, Facebook expanded to Stanford,Columbia, and Yale. It

    soon opened to the other Ivy League schools, Boston University, New York University,

    MIT, and gradually most universities in Canada and the United States.

    Facebook was incorporated in mid-2004, and the entrepreneurSean Parker, who had

    been informally advising Zuckerberg, became the company's president. In June 2004,

    Facebook moved its base of operations to Palo Alto, California. The company dropped

    The from its name after purchasing the domain name facebook.com in 2005 for

    $200,000.

    Facebook expanded membership eligibility to employees of several companies,

    including Apple Inc. and Microsoft. Facebook was then opened on September 26, 2006,

    to everyone of age 13 and older with a valid email address.

    Ownership

    The ownership percentages of the company are as follows. Mark Zuckerberg: 28.4%,

    Accel Partners: 10%, Digital Sky Technologies: 10%, Dustin Moskovitz: 6%, Eduardo

    Saverin: 5%, Sean Parker: 4%, Peter Thiel: 3%, Greylock Partners and Meritech Capital

    Partners: between 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvard_Collegehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduardo_Saverinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dustin_Moskovitzhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_McCollumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_McCollumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Hugheshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_Universityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_Universityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yale_Universityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivy_Leaguehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Universityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Universityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIThttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorporation_%28business%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Parkerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palo_Alto,_Californiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_namehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsofthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_addresshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accel_Partnershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Sky_Technologieshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dustin_Moskovitzhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduardo_Saverinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduardo_Saverinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Parkerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Thielhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greylock_Partnershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritech_Capital_Partnershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritech_Capital_Partnershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritech_Capital_Partnershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritech_Capital_Partnershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greylock_Partnershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Thielhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Parkerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduardo_Saverinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduardo_Saverinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dustin_Moskovitzhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Sky_Technologieshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accel_Partnershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_addresshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsofthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_namehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palo_Alto,_Californiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Parkerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorporation_%28business%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIThttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Universityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Universityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivy_Leaguehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yale_Universityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_Universityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_Universityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Hugheshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_McCollumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_McCollumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dustin_Moskovitzhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduardo_Saverinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvard_College
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    27/67

    Page | 21

    Source: Wikipedia

    to 2% each, Microsoft: 1.3%, Li Ka-shing: 0.75%, the Interpublic Group: less than 0.5%.

    A small group of current and former employees and celebrities own less than 1% each,

    including Matt Cohler, Jeff Rothschild, Adam D'Angelo, Chris Hughes, and Owen VanNatta, while Reid Hoffman and Mark Pincus have sizable holdings of the company. The

    remaining 30% or so are owned by employees, an undisclosed number of celebrities,

    and outside investors. Adam D'Angelo, chief technology officer and friend of

    Zuckerberg, resigned in May 2008. Reports claimed that he and Zuckerberg began

    quarreling, and that he was no longer interested in partial ownership of the company.

    Revenue

    Most of Facebook's revenue comes from advertising. Microsoft is Facebook's exclusive

    partner for serving banner advertising, and therefore Facebook serves only

    advertisements that exist in Microsoft's advertisement inventory.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsofthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_Ka-shinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpublic_Grouphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Cohlerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_D%27Angelohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Hugheshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owen_Van_Nattahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owen_Van_Nattahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reid_Hoffmanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Pincushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_D%27Angelohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_bannerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advertising_networkhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advertising_networkhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_bannerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_D%27Angelohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Pincushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reid_Hoffmanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owen_Van_Nattahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owen_Van_Nattahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Hugheshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_D%27Angelohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Cohlerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpublic_Grouphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_Ka-shinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    28/67

    Page | 22

    Facebook generally has a lowerclickthrough rate (CTR) for advertisements than most

    major Web sites. According to BusinessWeek.com, banner advertisements on

    Facebook have generally received one-fifth the number of clicks compared to those on

    the Web as a whole, although specific comparisons can reveal a much larger disparity.

    For example, while Google users click on the first advertisement for search results an

    average of 8% of the time (80,000 clicks for every one million searches), Facebook's

    users click on advertisements an average of 0.04% of the time (400 clicks for every one

    million pages).

    Source: Wikipedia

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clickthrough_ratehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clickthrough_rate
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    29/67

    Page | 23

    Profile

    Twitter is an online social networking service and micro blogging service that enables its

    users to send and read text-based posts of up to 140 characters, known as "tweets". It

    was created in March 2006 by Jack Dorsey and launched that July. The service rapidly

    gained worldwide popularity, with over 300 million users as of 2011, generating over300 million tweets and handling over 1.6 billion search queries per day. It has been

    described as "the SMS of the Internet."

    Twitter Inc. is based in San Francisco, with additional servers and offices in New York

    City.

    Creation

    Twitter's origins lie in a "daylong brainstorming session" held by board members of the

    podcasting company Odeo. Dorsey introduced the idea of an individual using an SMS

    service to communicate with a small group. The original project code name for the

    service was twttr, an idea that Williams later ascribed to Noah Glass, inspired by Flickr

    and the five-character length of American SMS short codes. The developers initially

    considered "10958" as a short code, but later changed it to "40404" for "ease of use and

    memorability." Work on the project started on March 21, 2006, when Dorsey published

    the first Twitter message at 9:50 PM Pacific Standard Time (PST): "just setting up my

    twttr".

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_networking_servicehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microblogginghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Character_%28computing%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Dorseyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_search_queryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMShttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podcasthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odeohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_code_namehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noah_Glasshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flickrhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_codehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Standard_Timehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Standard_Timehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_codehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flickrhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noah_Glasshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_code_namehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odeohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podcasthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMShttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_search_queryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Dorseyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Character_%28computing%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microblogginghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_networking_service
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    30/67

    Page | 24

    "...we came across the word 'twitter', and it was just perfect. The definition was 'a short

    burst of inconsequential information,' and 'chirps from birds'. And that's exactly what the

    product was." Jack Dorsey

    The first Twitter prototype was used as an internal service for Odeo employees and the

    full version was introduced publicly on July 15, 2006. In October 2006, Biz Stone, Evan

    Williams, Dorsey, and other members of Odeo formed Obvious Corporation and

    acquired Odeo and all of its assets including Odeo.com and Twitter.com from the

    investors and shareholders. Williams fired Glass who was silent about his part in

    Twitter's startup until 2011. Twitter spun off into its own company in April 2007.

    Leadership

    As chief executive officer, Dorsey saw the startup through two rounds of capital funding

    by the venture capitalists who backed the company.

    On October 16, 2008, Williams took over the role of CEO, and Dorsey became

    chairman of the board.[28]

    On October 4, 2010, Williams announced that he was stepping down as CEO. Dick

    Costolo, formerly Twitter's chief operating officer, became CEO. According to a Twitter

    blog, dated October 4, 2010, Williams was to staywith the company and "be completely

    focused on product strategy."

    According toThe New York Times, "Mr. Dorsey and Mr. Costolo forged a close

    relationship" when Williams was away. According toPC Magazine, Williams was "no

    longer involved in the day-to-day goings on at the company". He is focused on

    developing a new startup, but he became a member of Twitter's board of directors, and

    promised to "help in any way I can". Stone is still with Twitter but is working with AOL as

    an "advisor on volunteer efforts and philanthropy".

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Dorseyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biz_Stonehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Williams_%28entrepreneur%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Williams_%28entrepreneur%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_executive_officerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venture_capitalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter#cite_note-27http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter#cite_note-27http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter#cite_note-27http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Costolohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Costolohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_operating_officerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Timeshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Timeshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Timeshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PC_Magazinehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PC_Magazinehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PC_Magazinehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PC_Magazinehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Timeshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_operating_officerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Costolohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Costolohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter#cite_note-27http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venture_capitalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_executive_officerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Williams_%28entrepreneur%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Williams_%28entrepreneur%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biz_Stonehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Dorsey
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    31/67

    Page | 25

    Dorsey rejoined Twitter in March 2011, as executive chairman focusing on product

    development. His time is split with Square (where he is CEO), whose offices are within

    walking distance of Twitter's in San Francisco.

    In September 2011, Board Members and investors Fred Wilson and Bijan Sabet

    resigned from Twitter's Board of Directors.

    Funding

    Twitter raised over US$57 million from venture capitalist growth funding, although exact

    numbers are not publicly disclosed. Twitter's first A round of funding was for an

    undisclosed amount that is rumored to have been between $1 million and $5 million. Its

    second B round of funding in 2008 was for $22 million and its third C round of funding in

    2009 was for $35 million from Institutional Venture Partners and Benchmark Capital

    along with an undisclosed amount from other investors including Union Square

    Ventures, Spark Capital and Insight Venture Partners. Twitter is backed by Union

    Square Ventures, Digital Garage, Spark Capital, and Bezos Expeditions.

    In May 2008,The Industry Standardremarked that Twitter's long-term viability is limited

    by a lack of revenue. Twitter board member Todd Chaffee forecast that the company

    could profit from e-commerce, noting that users may want to buy items directly from

    Twitter since it already provides product recommendations and promotions.

    The company raised $200 million in new venture capital in December 2010, at a

    valuation of approximately $3.7 billion. In March 2011, 35,000 Twitter shares sold for

    $34.50 each on Sharespost, an implied valuation of $7.8 billion. In August, 2010 Twitter

    announced a "significant" investment lead by Digital Sky Technology that, at $800million, was reported to be the largest venture round in history.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_%28payment_service%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Wilson_%28financier%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venture_capitalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benchmark_Capitalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insight_Venture_Partnershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Square_Ventureshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Square_Ventureshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Industry_Standardhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Industry_Standardhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Industry_Standardhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-commercehttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Digital_Sky_Technology&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venture_roundhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venture_roundhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Digital_Sky_Technology&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-commercehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Industry_Standardhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Square_Ventureshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Square_Ventureshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insight_Venture_Partnershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benchmark_Capitalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venture_capitalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Wilson_%28financier%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_%28payment_service%29
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    32/67

    Page | 26

    Use Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    Social networks have become the lifeline of communication for many a working person

    across the world. They are the platform that people share with friends and family to

    catch up on what is happening in each others life. People have little time to actually

    connect in the real world that makes social networks especially important.

    Should social networks be banned at the workplace is a rather serious and volatile

    discussion. It is a question that is being discussed in many management and HR

    meetings even as you are reading this. Policies are probably being drawn up to be

    included in gigantic employee manuals but this is something that should be handled

    with careful consideration, and forethought. It is easy for a business to ban social

    networks from the workplace but, should they do this without considering the

    advantages that the experience of being on the sites brings to the company.

    Social networking is slowly taking over the Internet. People are using these sites to do

    more than just connect to friends and those who have the same interests, they are now

    being used to establish business contacts and maintain these business relationships.

    But, with all the information that people display on their social networking site, such as

    pictures that show them having a night out with friends, people are wondering do socialnetworking sites have a place in the business world? This is an excellent question that

    many company heads are now asking themselves and weighing the pros and cons of

    the issue, as well as having the rest of the world weigh in on this decision

    To Ban or Not to Ban

    According to a report from Robert Half Technology, a whopping 54% of U.S. companies

    say that they have banned workers from using social networking sites like Twitter,

    Facebook, LinkedIn and MySpace while on the job. The study, released today, also

    found that 19% of companies allow social networking use only for business purposes,

    while 16% allow limited personal use. Some of the reasons typically given by employers

    for wanting to ban social networks at the workplace are as follows:

    http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9139020/Study_54_of_companies_ban_Facebook_Twitter_at_workhttp://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9139020/Study_54_of_companies_ban_Facebook_Twitter_at_work
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    33/67

    Page | 27

    Exposure of companys computers and network to virus and spyware.

    Loss in productivity affecting the bottom line.

    Affect on available bandwidth to the business.

    Legal Liability

    Leaking of corporate information.

    Only 10% of the 1,400 CIOs interviewed said that their companies allow employees full

    access to social networks during work hours.

    "Using social networking sites may divert employees' attention away from more

    pressing priorities, so it's understandable that some companies limit access," said Dave

    Willmer, executive director of Robert Half Technology and a Computerworldcolumnist,

    in a statement. "For some professions, however, these sites can be leveraged as

    effective business tools, which may be why about one in five companies allow their use

    for work-related purposes."

    A study released last summer concluded that social networking use could hurt the

    bottom line.

    Nucleus Research, an IT research firm, reported in July that employee productivity

    drops 1.5% at companies that allow full access to Facebook in the workplace. That

    survey of 237 corporate employees also showed that 77% of workers who have a

    Facebook account use it during work hours.

    Nucleus said that the survey found that "some" employees use the social networking

    site for as much as two hours a day at work And of those using Facebook at work, 87%

    said they had no clear business reason for accessing the network.

    Interestingly a large number of businesses use social networks to recruit employees.

    Then it seems strange that they want to ban the same sites where they found their

    employees. Social networks offer an efficient and effective mode of communication that

    cannot be negated and simply banning the sites would be like throwing the baby away

    with the bath water.

    http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9135795/Study_Facebook_use_cuts_productivity_at_workhttp://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9135795/Study_Facebook_use_cuts_productivity_at_work
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    34/67

    Page | 28

    According to an AT&T a study on social networking technologies, access to social

    networking sites at the workplace actually increases employee productivity and

    efficiency. Employees feel that access to a wide and rich source of information on

    social networks often provided them solutions to problems and also inspired them

    creatively.

    AT &Ts white paper on this subject also showed that 74% of European employers

    stated the following benefits to allowing access to social networks at the workplace:

    Access to information and solution to problems.

    A medium of sharing knowledge and information between employees, suppliers

    and customers.

    Basis for better team building and internal structure in the workplace.

    Advantages

    Its very easy to jump to the conclusion that social networking is damaging to

    productivity, but there are benefits. Ask yourself if the morale boost for your staff and

    potential for free marketing to their friends is something your business can afford to

    miss.

    1. Theres a morale boost:When considering whether social networking sites should be

    used in a business, consider the morale that it gives workers. They can have a laugh or

    two during the day that can loosen up the rest of their day so that they are ready to

    work.

    2. Free marketing to friends: Those workers who acknowledge that they work for that

    particular company are able to give the business free marketing to all their friends.

    When they comment that they had a great day at work, this makes the business more

    appealing to those that are looking for a great business to work for. In addition, when

    someone has a problem with a certain case that they are working on, they can reach

    out with their network and gain other peoples perspective. This can help bring a whole

    http://www.corp.att.com/emea/insights/pr/eng/social_111108.htmlhttp://www.corp.att.com/emea/insights/pr/eng/social_111108.html
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    35/67

    Page | 29

    wider view of thinking that would otherwise be cut off if social networking was not

    allowed.

    3. You can never completely block social networks: Blocking social networking from

    occurring at work really does not work properly. With all the electronics that are

    available that allow instant access to these sites, the business is really only kidding

    themselves. You may block it on the computer, but otherwise, you have done nothing. If

    people want to find a way around the block they will, and all the hard earned money that

    you spent on putting these blocks in place are useless and a complete waste of funds

    that could have been used for something much more helpful.

    4. Form relationships with customers: Social media networking sites can help for your

    employees to stay connected to customers to form a lasting relationship, which is

    something that every business strives for.

    5.Builds credibility:You can build trust with customers if you can connect with them on

    both personal and professional level. Using social networking sites is all about sharing

    information, not only your own information but other peoples information that you think

    can be useful for others as well. The more your customers know about you, the better.

    Despite having to do a bit of work, it definitely pays off as you can be tapped for an offerif someone catches wind of your products or services. As long as you dont pursue them

    too aggressively, you will do well here.

    6. Building a strong brand and knowing your competition:Another huge advantage of

    social networking is that you can relatively quickly build a brand for your business. This

    is good news for people who are marketing online or thinking about a cheap and

    effective marketing strategy. Your marketing message will spread all around the web in

    a short time virtually for free. From a marketing perspective, one of the biggest

    advantages of social networking is that you can spy on your competition. All you need

    to do is follow them on the biggest social sites and you will have a good picture of what

    they are doing. This makes it easier for you to come up with a market plan and find your

    own niche.

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    36/67

    Page | 30

    Disadvantages

    There are many reasons why bosses have banned social networking in their business.

    But are they enough to convince you to block Facebook and Twitteret alin your office?

    1. Time Consuming:For starters, people are obsessed with these social networks. They

    feel a need to let everyone know what they are doing during all times of the day,

    including the work day. This means that more and more employees are accessing the

    social network while they should be focusing on work for their boss. Therefore, in order

    to make sure that people remain on task, social networking has been banned

    If this is not your kind of thing that it would just be a waste of time for you. The key to

    social networking is that it is supposed to be fun, whether you are just doing it for kicks

    or clicking around for business purposes. That should be reasonable enough for

    anyone, but there are those people who don't see the point. For them, it can be a

    disadvantage.

    2.Increased susceptibility to attack:Using these social network sites at work can increase

    the chances of the computer being targeted for an attack. For example, many of the

    scams out there that involve social network sites obtain personal data from the

    computer in which the site is being accessed. If this were to happen at a business, they

    risk the chance of having confidential client information released. So for safety, these

    sites should be blocked from the business world .

    3.Affecting the productivity of employees:The use of social networking sites has become

    very easy in todays world of growing technology. Anyone can access his or her profile

    with just an operating system and internet connectivity. Employees at work often get

    tempted to use these websites. They use social media extensively while working atoffice. It is argued that it decreases their productivity and efficiency and thus decreases

    the companys profits. Another perspective is that using such sites relieves the

    employees stress and helps the business in many other ways. The main issue arising

    in many parts of the world is whether social media be banned at workplace or not.

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    37/67

    Page | 31

    4. Greater scope for dissent in the workplace:Allowing social network sites to be used in

    the workplace can lead to arguments among employees as they fight over ridiculous

    aspects such as who are friends with whom. This can only decrease the productivity

    and the morale in the workplace. In addition, it can lead to more arguments that turn into

    a he said, she said sort of problem that does not help productivity in the least and can

    cause even more problems at work.

    5.Access to information and misuse:Many social networking services, such as Facebook,

    provide the user with a choice of who can view their profile. This prevents unauthorized

    user(s) from accessing their information. Parents who want to access their child's

    MySpace or Facebook account have become a big problem for teenagers who do not

    want their profile seen by their parents. By making their profile private, teens can selectwho may see their page, allowing only people added as "friends" to view their profile

    and preventing unwanted viewing of the profile by parents. To edit information on a

    certain social networking service account, the social networking sites require you to

    login or provide a password. This prevents unauthorized user(s) from adding, changing,

    or removing personal information, pictures, and/or other data.

    What Next?

    Clearly the use of social networks is important to employees and plays a crucial role in

    their lives and should not be banned at the workplace completely. What is important is

    to specify how such use may be permissible in the workplace. Employee-employer

    communications are essential to clarify issues such as how much time may be spent

    online and that company information should not be revealed, knowingly or unknowingly.

    Some experts suggest that having a company presence on social networks, in the form

    of a group, help bind employees and strengthen the corporate team. It is interesting to

    note that over 40,000 MySpace groups and 4,000 Facebook groups are either company

    or employee based.

    So the discussion goes on. What is your take on this subject?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loginhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passwordhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passwordhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Login
  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    38/67

    Page | 32

    UNIT 4

    ANALYSIS OF CONSUMER PERCEPTION

    TOWARDS SOCIAL NETWORKING

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    39/67

    Page | 33

    Table 1: Age of respondents

    (N=100)

    Particulars Frequency Percentage

    0 15 yrs15 30 yrs

    30 45 yrs

    45 and above

    292

    2

    3

    292

    2

    3

    Total 100 100

    The age of respondents of the survey is shown in this table. The respondents who were

    surveyed were mostly aged between 15 and 30 years with 92 %. People with less than

    15 years of age were only 2. People with age between 30 and 45 years were also 2 and

    there were 3 people whose age was above 45 years.

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Age

    0-15 yrs

    15-30 yrs

    30-45 yrs

    Above 45 yrs

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    40/67

    Page | 34

    Table 2: Occupation of respondents

    (N=100)

    Particulars Frequency Percentage

    EmployeeStudent

    Businessperson

    490

    6

    490

    6

    Total 100 100

    The above table presents the occupation of the people surveyed. The highest number

    of respondents were students with 90. There were 4 people who were working as

    employees and 6 people who were running a business. Thus, it can be concluded that

    the respondents who were surveyed consisted mostly of the youth.

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Occupation

    Employee

    Student

    Businessperson

    Other

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    41/67

    Page | 35

    Table 3: Time spent on internet everyday

    (N=100)

    Particulars Frequency Percentage

    0 2 hrs2 4 hrs

    More than 4 hrs

    8315

    2

    8315

    2

    Total 100 100

    This table shows the average time spent by people every day. Most of the people said

    they use internet between 0 and 2 hours (83%). 15% of the people use it for more than

    2 hours but less than 4 hours and only 2 out of 100 use it for more than 4 hours. It can

    be clearly seen that many people prefer to use internet for not more than 2 hours per

    day. With the internet connection becoming easily available and cheaper by the day,

    there are some people who have started using it for longer periods.

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Time Spent On Internet Everyday

    0-2 hrs

    2-4 hrs

    More than 4 hrs

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    42/67

    Page | 36

    Table 4: Use of social networking websites

    (N=100)

    Particulars Frequency Percentage

    YesNo

    955

    955

    Total 100 100

    This table shows how many of the people surveyed use social networking sites. A

    majority of them said they use social networking sites on a regular basis. 95% of the

    people do social networking while only 5% stay away from it. This shows the popularity

    of social networking sites. Anyone can join these sites and use it without any payment.

    They provide a place for networking, playing games and act as a stress buster. Thus, it

    is no surprise that most of the people are getting addicted to social networking.

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Use Social Networking Sites

    Yes

    No

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    43/67

    Page | 37

    Table 5: Time spent on social networks everyday

    (N=100)

    Particulars Frequency Percentage

    Less than 1 hour1 3 hrs

    More than 3 hrs

    7019

    11

    7019

    11

    Total 100 100

    It is also important to know how much time people spend on social networking sites.

    70% of the people use it for less than an hour. 19 people said they use it for more than1 hour but less than 3 hours and 11 people said they use it for more than 3 hours. A lot

    of people do not spend too much time on these websites but some people who are

    addicted use it extensively. With the mushrooming popularity of such sites, we can

    expect that there could be more people in the future who start using it for more time.

    0

    10

    2030

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Time Spent On Social Networks Everyday

    Less than 1 hour

    1-3 hrs

    More than 3 hrs

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    44/67

    Page | 38

    Table 6: Use of internet for -

    (N=100)

    Particulars Frequency Percentage

    Using social networksSurfing for information

    Both

    2018

    62

    2018

    62

    Total 100 100

    This table shows what people usually do while they are online i.e. the reason for using

    internet. Some people use it only for social networking while some use it only to search

    the information they need. But most of the people are interested in both, social networks

    and information related websites. Though the majority of people are using it for both the

    purposes, it can be seen that 1 out of every 5 individuals is only interested in social

    networking which is a bad sign.

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Use Of Internet

    Using social networks

    Surfing for information

    Both

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    45/67

    Page | 39

    Table 7: Most used social networking website

    (N=100)

    Particulars Frequency Percentage

    FacebookTwitter

    Myspace

    Orkut

    Google+

    828

    1

    3

    6

    828

    1

    3

    6

    Total 100 100

    The most popular social networking website was Facebook. Facebook totally out-

    numbered all other social networks with an astonishing 82% of the people. Facebooks

    popularity has immensely increased in the past couple of years. Twitter was the second

    most popular social networking website with 8% while Myspace, Orkut and Google+ had

    even less number of users.

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Most Popular Social Networking Website

    Facebook

    Twitter

    Myspace

    Orkut

    Google+

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    46/67

    Page | 40

    Table 8: Reason for use of social networking websites

    (N=100)

    Particulars Frequency Percentage

    Takes stress away

    Networking

    Playing games

    20

    65

    15

    20

    65

    15

    Total 100 100

    A question arises as to why people use social networking sites so often. A majority of

    people are using them for networking i.e. connecting with old and new friends and

    sharing their day to day stories. Some of the people said they use them for relieving the

    stress when they are tired and some people use it for playing games.

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    Reason For Use Of Social Networking

    Takes stress away

    Networking

    Playing games

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    47/67

    Page | 41

    Table 9: Use of social media at work or study

    (N=100)

    Particulars Frequency Percentage

    YesNo

    3763

    3763

    Total 100 100

    This is one of the most important things to know as far as the topic is concerned

    whether people use social networking sites while working and studying or not. 63% of

    the respondents do not use such sites while working or studying. But around 37 people

    said they use social media while working or studying which is fairly a large number.

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    Use Of Social Media At Work Or Study

    Yes

    No

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    48/67

    Page | 42

    Table 10: Aware of the pros and cons of social media at work

    (N=100)

    Particulars Frequency Percentage

    YesNo

    7228

    7228

    Total 100 100

    This bar graph depicts whether the people are aware of the advantages and

    disadvantages of using social media at work or not. 72% of the people said they know

    about the benefits and harms of using social networks while working and the rest said

    they are not aware them. It can be seen that a majority of people know about the pros

    and cons of using social media at work.

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    Aware Of Pros And Cons Of Using Social media at work

    Yes

    No

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    49/67

    Page | 43

    Table 11: Social networking at work decreases productivity of people

    (N=100)

    Particulars Frequency Percentage

    YesNo

    Maybe

    168

    76

    168

    76

    Total 100 100

    This pie graph shows whether the people think social networking decreases the

    productivity and efficiency of employees or not. 16 out of 100 said yes, using these sites

    distracts the concentration of employees and affects their efficiency while 8 said they

    dont think it will affect the efficiency of employees. 76% of the people are not sure

    whether it will affect the employees efficiency or not. Thus, many people do not if it will

    affect the employees and there should be more awareness about it.

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    Social Networking Decreases Productivity At Work

    Yes

    No

    Maybe

  • 7/29/2019 A PROJECT REPORT ON A Perceptional Analysis On Banning Of Social Networking Websites At Work

    50/67

    Page | 44

    Table 12: Aware that foreign companies have banned these sites at work

    (N=100)

    Particulars Frequency Percentage

    YesNo

    5050

    5050

    Total 100 100

    There are some foreign companies that have banned social networking websites in their

    office because of efficiency concerns. This table shows whether the respondents

    surveyed are aware of this fact or not. The number of people in both the categories is

    equal. There are 50 people who said they are aware of this fact and 50 said they are not

    aware it.

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20