a strengths based approach to meeting the health needs of aboriginal children in out of home care...
TRANSCRIPT
A Strengths based approach to meeting the Health Needs of Aboriginal Children
in Out of Home Care
KARI Aboriginal Resources Incorporated
Sandra Reynolds, Psychologist
Casey Ralph, Casework Manager
Children in Out-of-home-careAustralia
• Every year 12-13,000 children enter care
• 28,441 children in care in June 2007
• Approx 40% under 5yrs (10% under 1yr), 25% 5-9yrs, 25% 10-14yrs, 10% 15-17yrs
• Indigenous (Aboriginal) children over-represented – 7 times
• Aboriginal population: vulnerable, poorest health outcomes in Australia
Background: Children in OOHC
• Vulnerable group of children
• High health needs
• Unrecognised health needs
• Unmet health needs
• Recent interest to address these needs:– RACP Policy, State initiatives
Health problems of foster kids:
US data
• 40-80% have some chronic health problems• 33% untreated health problems• 40-60%- increased exposure to alcohol, tobacco,
illicit drugs- which can cause brain impairment• Mental health problems: 30-80%• Abnormal growth, poor nutritional status-15-25%• 34% inadequate immunisation coverage• > 15% have no routine health care
Simms, Dubowitz & Szilagyi, Paediatrics 2000
Mental health of children in foster and kinship care in
Australia
• Levels/ rates of disturbance for children in foster care worse than prior estimates
• 53% ♀ and 57% ♂ scored in clinical range CBCL
• Significantly higher rates than community sample
• Characteristic problems: elimination (toileting), sexual and conduct problems
• Boys worse than girls on severity
Tarren-Sweeney &Philip Hazell, JPCH 2006
Identified Health Problems:SCH OOHC Clinic (Sydney)
• Incomplete immunisation 24%
• Abnormal vision screen 30%
• Abnormal hearing test 28%
• Dental problems 30%
• Failed dev screen 60%
• Speech delay 33%
• Abnormal growth 14%
• Infections 12%
• Behavioural/emotional problems 54Nathanson & Tzioumi, JPCH 2007
The KARI Clinic
Program Commenced late 2003Comprehensive Health & Developmental Assessments for
Aboriginal Children Entering Foster Care in SWS
A Partnership betweenKARI Aboriginal Resources Inc (NGO)
South Western Sydney Area Health Service
DoCS NSW –(Welfare)
KARI Clinic
• Culturally appropriate, active involvement of KARI staff and foster parents
• Multidisciplinary: Paediatric, SP, OT, PT, SW, others as required
• Attempts made to identify strengths first
• Monitoring and evaluation built into Clinic: - quarterly management meetings of key stakeholders
KARI Organisation
• Co-ordinates OOHC program for Aboriginal Children across SWS
• Role- recruit and train quality Aboriginal foster parents to provide culturally appropriate care.
• Full case management of children and carers
Aims
• To identify the health needs of Aboriginal children entering care in SWS
• To identify strengths in these children and characteristics that promote resilience
• To determine if identified health needs were met with available services
• To identify barriers to appropriate care
Methods
• Analysed records of 139 children attending KARI clinic
• Information collected: clinic outcomes, strengths, defects identified, treatment and recommendations
• Reviews: To monitor progress and identify if recommendations implemented
• Service providers, carers interviewed about barriers to care by independent evaluators
Methods
• Data entered routinely into Access database
• Analysis of frequencies, cross tabs performed on SPSS V15
• Subgroup analysis unable to be performed due to small numbers
Results
• Complete data on 99 children• Age range: 2 months – 12.5 years,
– average age: 4.5 yrs, 60% < 5yrs
• Boys: 54%• Majority: neglect, PA and exp to DV, 20%
sexual abuse concerns• Parental history: Substance use,
incarceration, ID, 23% known psychosis
Health Problems -1
• Immunisation: 49.5% UTD• Hearing problems: 44% concerns, 9% already had
impaired hearing• Vision: 35% had visual concerns
– 18% had decreased vision or squints
• Dental: 36% had probs (caries, pain, abscess)– 6 needed urgent dental extraction
Health problems- 2Developmental/Behavioural
• Speech delay: 66% of those assessed– Of these almost 1/3 had mod to severe
delay/disorder• Fine motor probs: 33% of those assessed• Behaviour problems: 45% (internalising and ext)• Education problems: 66% of school age children• Overall development: 73% WNL
– 27% global delay
Other Health problems
• Skin problems: scabies, eczema, impetigo• Investigation for seizures, FAS• Short stature, Obesity, FTT • Risk for Hepatitis C• Referrals: Ophthalmology, Genetics, ENT,
Cardiology, Endocrinology, Dermatology
• 16% of children were doing well at first visit!• 34% of children reviewed showed improvement with
stable care• Characteristics of children doing well or improving:
no sig diff on demographics (eg. gender, age) – but noted by clinicians to be positive, have
pleasing temperament, good at recruiting adults
What about Strengths?
Progress in Care
• Improved: 34%
• Stable: 30%
• Declined: 13% • (70% Male & between 5-13years)
• Not reviewed: 23%
Independent EvaluationQualitative research:
Carers Views2005
• Children are receiving health and developmental assessments
• Potential model for all children in OOHC• Good quality reports: carers have copies• Carers empowered
Centre for Health Equity, Training & Research, 2005
Independent Evaluation:Carers and Service Providers
But
• Recommendations not followed up • Children identified with problems: not
treated • Not enough resources
Barriers to providing comprehensive assessments
• Obtaining available relevant information– Changes in caseworkers– Natural parents unknown– Children changing addresses, names – Medicare number unavailable
• Consents for obtaining information
Barriers-2
• Caseworkers relying on foster parents to follow up recommendations
• Foster parents reluctant to attend clinic or follow up on recommendations
• Cultural identity• Placement breakdown and changes-
– clinic staff not informed
Discussion/Challenges
• How to measure and focus on strengths appropriately• Not easy to measure strengths in standardised manner• Data analysis difficult: small numbers, categorical
variables• Many systems issues prevent prioritising these children• Qualities of carers may be very imp in determining
outcomes• Cultural Identity
Conclusion
• KARI kids: similar rates of problems identified as other studies
• Comprehensive paed/developmental assessment early in child’s placement CAN facilitate appropriate intervention
• Significant barriers to appropriate care for these children persist
• Using a strengths model: possible to identity factors promoting resilience in these children