1

2010 7 1-26

135

9 17

____________________

Yuch16@yahoo.com.tw, mujinc@nccu.edu.tw

2010.05.27 2010.06.11 2010.06.30

2

Journal of Educational Administration and Evaluation

July, 2010, Vol. 9 pp. 1-26

A study of the fitness among indicators of

quality management and performance

management for quality school

Nien-Hsiang Yang Mu-Jin Chen

Abstract

This study examines the content of “indicators of quality management” and “indicators of

performance management” of the administration management dimension for quality

school. 135 administrators of elementary and middle schools in Taipei city (including

principals, directors, and section chiefs) were selected as subjects of the study. Data were

analyzed by structural equation modeling (SEM) and the main findings were as follows:

1.The fitness among indicators of quality management and indicators of performance

management are significant. 2.Indicators of quality management have remarkable

influences on indicators of performance management. Based on the results of the study,

conclusions and suggestions are offered to educational authorities, school administrative

personnels, and follow-up researchers.

Keyword: quality school, indicators of quality management, indicators of performance

management

____________________

Nien-Hsiang Yang: Doctoral student/Department of Education, National Chengchi University

Mu-Jin Chen: Director/Center for Teaching and Learning Development, National Chengchi

University

E-mail: Yuch16@yahoo.com.tw, mujinc@nccu.edu.tw

Manuscript received: 2010.05.27; Revised: 2010.06.11; Accepted: 2010.06.30

3

1994

2007

2006

2005 1982 Blue

Ribbon School Program

2003 1998

Beacon Schools

2003

2004

2004 2008

e

4

e

135

LISREL8.72

quality management, QM

Rusinko, 2005

2008

ISO 9000 ISO

P-D-C-A 1. Plan

2.

Do 3. Check /

4. Act

ISO, 2006

P-D-C-A 1

5

1 PDCA

total quality control,

TQC total quality management, TQM 2004

Sallis, 1993 De Jager Nieuwenhuis 2005

TQM 1. leadership

2. scientific methods and tools 3.

problem-solving through teamwork

customer service Sevick 1993

6

P-D-C-A

1.

2.

3.

4.

5. 6.

7.

2005

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6. PDCA

PDCA

2007

PDCA

7

e

performance management

2002 Bae 2006

2

2008

2004

8

2

Bae 2006: 1430-1437

1990 Kaplan Norton

2008

Poll,

2001

Karathanos & Karathanos, 2005 2005

1.

2.

3.

4.

1.

9

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

2007

10

e

2007

e

2004

2009

e

2010 1

11

1 99

99

2010 6

2004 2009

135

LISREL8.72

LISREL8.72

12

1.

2.

LISREL 8.72

3

3

1. 1

2. !1

1. X1 X5

2. Y1 Y6

1. "1 "5

2. #1 #5

1. $11

13

2. %1

135

9 17

2

1

2

3

4

5

1

3

2

4

5

6

14

2

1. 6

2. 5

3. 5

4. 5

5. 6

6. 5

7. 5

8. 4

9. 4

1. 6

2. 5

3. 5

4. 5

5. 5

6. 6

7. 5

8. 6

9. 6

10. 6

11. 5

12. 5

13. 5

14. 5

15. 5

16. 5

17. 5

135

15

&

2008 &

e

Likert-type

6 5 4 3 2 1

&

135

LISREL 8.72

2006

3

1.

RMR root mean square residual .028

.05

16

2.

NFI normed fit index NNFI non-normed fit index

.97 .90 CFI comparative fit index IFI incremental

fit index .98 .90 RFI relative fit index .96

.90

3.

PNFI parsimony normed fit index .76

0~1

4.

!

5.

R2

3

! R2

X1 .91 "1 .17 R2 X = .83 NFI= .97

NNFI= .97

CFI= .98

IFI= .98

RFI= .96

PNFI= .76

RMR= .028

$= .95

X2 .84 "2 .30 R2 X = .71

X3 .91 "3 .17 R2 X = .83

X4 .91 "4 .16 R2 X = .83

X5 .88 "5 .22 R2 X = .77

Y1 .75 #1 .44 R2 X = .56

Y2 .93 #2 .13 R2 X = .86

Y3 .91 #3 .18 R2 X = .83

Y4 .89 #4 .21 R2 X = .79

Y5 .89 #5 .21 R2 X = .79

Y6 .90 #6 .19 R2 X = .81

17

4

4 X1 X5

.91 .84 .91 .91 .88 t

X1 X5 "1

.95

.17

.30

.17

.16

.22

.44

.18

.19

.13

.21

.21

.91

.84

.91

.91

.88

.90

.75

.93

.91

.89

.89

18

4 Y1 Y6

.75 .93 .91 .89 .89 .90 t

Y1 Y6 #1

4

!11 .95 t 10.81 .001

2009

19

X1 X5

X1 X5

2005 ISO 9000

2007

2004

2005

Y1 Y6

Y1 Y6

2004

2004

2006

2006

2002

20

38.42%

61.92%

1. 2.

3. 4. 5.

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

135

21

1.

e

2.

1.

22

TQM

P-D-C-A

2.

e

1.

2.

23

2006 SIMPLIS

2002 P. Sydanmaanlakka

An intelligent organization : integrating

performance, competence and knowledge management

2003 50 117-118

2005

6-17

2006 2006 2006

6-13

2008 26 37-69

2005

2007

2003 25 16-18

2005

18-29

2006

2007

10-25

2007

50 87-102

2008 11

2005 ISO 9000

2006

24

2002

2008

2004

2004

99

2010 2010 6 14

http://tpqs.tp.edu.tw/comm/DocView.aspx?S=YER20091202142220ZSH&CDE=DO

C20091226115247LCD

2004

2004

2004

2009

Bae, Eul-Kyoo. (2006). Major elements and issues in performance management system: A

literature review. Columbus, OH: The Academy of Human Resource Development

international conference (AHRD). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED

492860)

De Jager, H. J., & Nieuwenhuis, F. J. (2005). Linkages between total quality management

and the outcomes-based approach in an education environment. Quality in Higher

Education, 11(3), 251-260.

ISO (2006). Understand the basics. Retrieved May 7, 2010, from

http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/management_standards/understand_the_basics.

htm

Karathanos, D., & Karathanos, P. (2005). Applying the balanced scorecard to education.

Journal of Education for Business, 80(4), 222-230.

Poll, R. (2001). Performance, process, and costs: Managing service quality with the

balanced scorecard. Library Trends, 49(4), 709-717.

Rusinko, C. A. (2005). Using quality management as a bridge to environmental

25

sustainability in organizations. Advanced Management Journal 70(4), 54-60.

Sallis, E. (1993). Total quality management in education. London: Kogan Page.

Sevick, C. (1993, March). Can Deming’s concept of total quality management be applied

to education? Paper presented at the annual conference on Creating Quality Schools,

Oklahoma city, OK.

26